For Those in Peril Case Study
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•535 views
This document discusses the production of a low budget British film. It was produced by Warp Films with a budget of £2 million and distributed by Film 4. The film was directed by a British director and had a low-paid cast of non-celebrity actors due to its small budget. It was promoted through Film 4's channel and website rather than mainstream TV ads like larger Hollywood films.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies. Warner Bros. is a large multinational distributor with a large budget that is unlikely to distribute low-budget, independent films. Film 4 Productions is a UK company that distributes independent films, especially gritty "kitchen sink" films, though it has a smaller budget and audience overseas. Left Film Distributor is a new independent UK distributor focused on horror, sci-fi, action and comedy genres from independent filmmakers, making it most likely to distribute the discussed low-budget, independent, horror film.
Question 3
The document discusses two potential film distributors - Warp Films and Paramount Pictures. Warp Films is an independent UK-based company that would allow for a lower budget but more localized audience. Paramount Pictures is a major Hollywood studio that would provide a larger budget but also greater expectations and less focus on the local audience. Both companies have experience distributing similar genre films to the one being discussed.
Question 3
Film distribution is a competitive business that involves launching films in the marketplace. The distributor is responsible for bringing each film to market from scratch and showcasing its potential. The author believes their film will appeal to the target audience of similar films distributed by Warner Bros., such as The Dark Knight Rises. Warner Bros. is a well-known international distributor of films in that genre. For promotion, the author plans to use the British Film Industry and release the low-budget film online and on DVD, since finding cinema distribution will be difficult.
Big vs small
The document discusses the differences between big and small budget films and film companies. The big 6 film studios - Paramount Pictures, 21st Century Fox, Disney, Universal, Columbia, and Warner Bros. - are the largest and highest earning studios, producing big budget films. Independent film studios like Warp Films, BBC, Film 4, and Vertigo produce films without partnerships with the big 6, often on smaller budgets between £500,000 to £8 million. While big budget films from major studios can spend over £200 million, allowing for big stars, elaborate sets and special effects, smaller budget independent films focus more on story and meaning but have less guaranteed cinema distribution.
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies and assesses their suitability for distributing an independent horror film of low budget. It is concluded that Left Film Distributor would be most likely to distribute the film, as they specialize in independent horror films for a UK audience, and support independent filmmakers despite having a limited budget. Warner Bros and Film4 Productions are also discussed but considered less suitable due to the former focusing on larger budget films and the latter having cut costs significantly in recent years.
Question 3
Film 4 and Warner Bros are traditional distributors that handle marketing and exhibition of films. Warner Bros is suited to larger budget blockbuster films while Film 4 focuses on smaller, British films. Microwave, funded by the BFI and BBC Films, helps produce and distribute independent films with budgets up to £25,000. They have had successful films that made returns despite small budgets. Given the dark tone, 15 rating, and low budget of the document's film, Film 4 and Microwave would be most viable to distribute it as they have experience with similar independent, local audience-targeted films.
Evaluation Question Three
Warp Films, Screen Gems, and StudioCanal UK are proposed as potential media institutions to distribute a new film. Warp Films is an independent British company that has successfully distributed comedic films on low budgets. Screen Gems distributes similar genre films like Guy Ritchie's "Snatch" for under $10 million. StudioCanal UK is a British company that has experience distributing crime-comedy films like "Hot Fuzz" and has worked with Warp Films, making it a good cultural fit.
Evaluation question 3
Dazzle, Blue Dolphin, and Axiom are all potential British independent film distributors for the media product. Dazzle has distributed award-winning films that could help the media product reach a larger audience. They also release films on DVD, which would increase profits. Blue Dolphin has a wide range of sellers that could ensure the film reaches a variety of audiences, and they have contacts with major TV networks. Axiom is known for taking creative risks and working with new talent, and their innovative marketing techniques could help the media product win awards.
Recommended
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies. Warner Bros. is a large multinational distributor with a large budget that is unlikely to distribute low-budget, independent films. Film 4 Productions is a UK company that distributes independent films, especially gritty "kitchen sink" films, though it has a smaller budget and audience overseas. Left Film Distributor is a new independent UK distributor focused on horror, sci-fi, action and comedy genres from independent filmmakers, making it most likely to distribute the discussed low-budget, independent, horror film.
Question 3
The document discusses two potential film distributors - Warp Films and Paramount Pictures. Warp Films is an independent UK-based company that would allow for a lower budget but more localized audience. Paramount Pictures is a major Hollywood studio that would provide a larger budget but also greater expectations and less focus on the local audience. Both companies have experience distributing similar genre films to the one being discussed.
Question 3
Film distribution is a competitive business that involves launching films in the marketplace. The distributor is responsible for bringing each film to market from scratch and showcasing its potential. The author believes their film will appeal to the target audience of similar films distributed by Warner Bros., such as The Dark Knight Rises. Warner Bros. is a well-known international distributor of films in that genre. For promotion, the author plans to use the British Film Industry and release the low-budget film online and on DVD, since finding cinema distribution will be difficult.
Big vs small
The document discusses the differences between big and small budget films and film companies. The big 6 film studios - Paramount Pictures, 21st Century Fox, Disney, Universal, Columbia, and Warner Bros. - are the largest and highest earning studios, producing big budget films. Independent film studios like Warp Films, BBC, Film 4, and Vertigo produce films without partnerships with the big 6, often on smaller budgets between £500,000 to £8 million. While big budget films from major studios can spend over £200 million, allowing for big stars, elaborate sets and special effects, smaller budget independent films focus more on story and meaning but have less guaranteed cinema distribution.
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies and assesses their suitability for distributing an independent horror film of low budget. It is concluded that Left Film Distributor would be most likely to distribute the film, as they specialize in independent horror films for a UK audience, and support independent filmmakers despite having a limited budget. Warner Bros and Film4 Productions are also discussed but considered less suitable due to the former focusing on larger budget films and the latter having cut costs significantly in recent years.
Question 3
Film 4 and Warner Bros are traditional distributors that handle marketing and exhibition of films. Warner Bros is suited to larger budget blockbuster films while Film 4 focuses on smaller, British films. Microwave, funded by the BFI and BBC Films, helps produce and distribute independent films with budgets up to £25,000. They have had successful films that made returns despite small budgets. Given the dark tone, 15 rating, and low budget of the document's film, Film 4 and Microwave would be most viable to distribute it as they have experience with similar independent, local audience-targeted films.
Evaluation Question Three
Warp Films, Screen Gems, and StudioCanal UK are proposed as potential media institutions to distribute a new film. Warp Films is an independent British company that has successfully distributed comedic films on low budgets. Screen Gems distributes similar genre films like Guy Ritchie's "Snatch" for under $10 million. StudioCanal UK is a British company that has experience distributing crime-comedy films like "Hot Fuzz" and has worked with Warp Films, making it a good cultural fit.
Evaluation question 3
Dazzle, Blue Dolphin, and Axiom are all potential British independent film distributors for the media product. Dazzle has distributed award-winning films that could help the media product reach a larger audience. They also release films on DVD, which would increase profits. Blue Dolphin has a wide range of sellers that could ensure the film reaches a variety of audiences, and they have contacts with major TV networks. Axiom is known for taking creative risks and working with new talent, and their innovative marketing techniques could help the media product win awards.
Evaulation question 3
Is my film a British or Hollywood film? why? what distribution companies would be interested? what production companies would be interested?
Evaluation question 2
The document discusses potential distributors for an independent, low-budget film with a dark tone and 15 rating. It analyzes Warner Bros, Disney, Film4, and Microwave. Warner Bros and Disney are ruled out as they focus on big-budget blockbusters. Film4 and Microwave are presented as the most viable options as they specialize in smaller, British films and have experience supporting independent productions through funding and distribution. Microwave in particular offers financing up to £25,000 and has successfully distributed similar small, local films to UK audiences.
what kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
This document discusses different types of media institutions that could distribute an independent film product. It describes production companies, distributors, and limited distributors. Production companies are responsible for fundraising, budgeting, organizing production, and distributing the completed film. Distributors market and release films in theaters or on DVD/Blu-Ray. They work with exhibitors to show films in theaters and receive a percentage of ticket sales. The document also mentions the BFI film fund as a source of funding for independent UK films.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Entertainment Film Distributors would be the most suitable distribution company for the filmmaker's low-budget supernatural horror film. EFD specializes in distributing independent British films and has experience with horror genres like Saw and The Final Destination. They could help the film reach a large audience without a huge budget. StudioCanal UK and EFD both work with small British productions, but EFD may require less money to distribute and promote the film using social media.
Sam Bellman Institution Task
The document compares the low-budget film The Blair Witch Project and the high-budget film The Hangover in terms of their production companies, budgets, box office earnings, and target audiences. The Blair Witch Project was independently produced for $500,000-$750,000 by the little-known company Haxan and grossed $248 million worldwide. In contrast, The Hangover had a $35 million budget from the major studio Warner Bros and grossed $467.5 million. Haxan typically produces horror and thriller films for audiences 15 and older while Warner Bros produces a variety of genres targeting those 18 to 34.
Evaluation presentation media
Film 4 would be the most suitable media institution to distribute the film. As an independent British film made on a small budget, it would best fit the profile of films typically distributed by Film 4 rather than larger studios. Film 4 has experience distributing similar small, independent British films that achieved success, such as The Inbetweeners Movie. While other potential distributors like BBC Films or Entertainment Film Distributors may also be good fits and have advantages, Film 4 is a more realistic choice given the scale of the film and Film 4's track record of marketing and finding audiences for comparable films.
DISTRIBUTION
The production company handles fundraising, scheduling, budgeting, scripting, resources, staff organization, post-production, distribution, and marketing. They have chosen Film4 Productions as their distributor because it is known for supporting low-budget British films in similar genres like psychological horror. Due to their low budget and lack of stars, a large distributor like Universal would not be possible. They plan to apply to the British Film Institute for funding to produce and market the film since it is a low-budget British production that will likely only appeal to UK audiences.
Blog3
Left Films would be a suitable distributor for the film as they specialize in distributing low-budget horror and thriller films, including slasher films similar to the one being proposed. Hammer Films and Film 4 Productions could also effectively distribute the film given their experience producing successful horror films and willingness to work with lower budgets. Both companies have audiences interested in the thriller/horror genre and would help attract new viewers.
Blog3
A film distributor is responsible for marketing and distributing a film. They set the release date and choose how the film will be exhibited or made available for viewing, such as in cinemas or on DVD. Multinational distributors have larger budgets to distribute and promote films nationally or worldwide, while independent distributors have limited local promotion budgets. Left Films and Hammer Films are suggested as potential distributors for the filmmaker's slasher film because they specialize in low-budget horror and thriller genres. Film4 Productions is also proposed as they have successfully distributed similar films without any current competing titles.
ice production slideshow
A production company is responsible for developing and producing media projects like films, music, radio, and television. The document discusses ICE Production Company and its plans to produce a film. ICE Production Company chose not to use a logo and instead use the same font in its titles to tie the name to the film. It would use a film distributor to distribute, market, and handle the release strategy of the film. The distributor specializes in film distribution and would focus on large-scale marketing instead of ICE Production Company handling those tasks. For funding, ICE Production Company determined a smaller, British production company would be more suitable than a large Hollywood studio due to lower costs and tax allowances.
Ownership of the movie industry
Here is a presentation I have created for my A2 media coursework about ownership of the film industry
Task 3 ownership of movie indusrty.
This is a presentation on the ownership of how our movie trailer will be good in the business and also information about the big 6 compared to a independent movie studio. There is also information about the movie company Disney about the facts and figures.
Task 03 powerpoint
The production company is called Smiley Inc Productions and was named to create irony between the company and thriller films. Their logo is a scratchy, edgy smiley face that builds on the thriller genre. Film distributors market and promote films by deciding screenings, release dates, and number of copies. Film4 would likely distribute the film since they release similar thrillers and support low-budget British films. The British Film Institute funds low-budget British films and could provide lottery money to cover production and marketing costs.
Film Distribution for The Searchers
Our film production company, Sinuous Pictures, produces psychological thrillers. Due to producing this genre of film, potential distributors that may be interested include New Line Cinema and Rogue, both of which have experience distributing similar thriller films successfully. A distributor is responsible for distributing the film to audiences by deciding where and when it screens, promoting the film, and organizing home video releases. We aim to appeal to both UK and international audiences, especially English-speaking markets, by promoting the film widely across various countries.
Film Distribution
The document discusses film distribution and provides examples of both successful and unsuccessful distribution strategies. It explains that distribution is key to a film's success and involves negotiating deals with agencies to show the film in cinemas and on home video. A success story describes how Lionsgate's distribution of The Hunger Games propelled it to major studio status. A failure story outlines how a last-minute change to a one-day cinema release for Iron Sky hurt its earnings potential.
Film institutions media 1 (1)
Blue Dolphin is an independent film distribution company that has been distributing films since the mid-1980s. They look for a diverse range of films and have sold films to major broadcasters. As beginners, the filmmakers would need assistance that Blue Dolphin specializes in providing. The independent film company specializes in project development, production, distribution, sales and marketing. They work with independent filmmakers and have global connections. This company offers options to help independent films get distributed. The BFI is a charity-funded company that distributes and publishes films. It provides lottery funding to support independent film production and distribution. The BFI's criteria matches what the filmmakers are looking for in a distribution partner.
Task 7 film distribution companies
Warp X is a British independent film production and distribution company founded in 2005. They specialize in low-budget films and have distributed 10 films in the past 8 years, including the crime thriller Kill List in 2011. Their film budgets typically range from £400,000 to £800,000. Warp X supports new and independent directors and talents, in line with their goal of promoting the British film industry. They would be the most suitable distributor for a new independent British crime film due to their experience with low-budget films and niche audiences.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
This document discusses potential media institutions that could distribute an independent media product and why. It analyzes several distribution companies/labels including Film 4, Vertigo Films, DNA Films, and creating your own label called Pyramid Productions. While Film 4 may be too large, Vertigo Films and DNA Films are presented as more realistic options for small independent films. Creating your own label could allow for receiving all profits if successful but would be difficult to promote.
Question 1
Our film, titled "MINE" and about a stalker plotting to kill her ex's girlfriend, would be best distributed by Working Title due to their association with Universal Studios, which would provide access to American actors and a $35 million budget for production and marketing. Failing that, as a small independent production company, we would likely use smaller UK distributors like Warp X, Film4, or ones funded by the BFI and National Lottery, and submit our film to film festivals around the country.
Distribution Options
Film 4 and the BFI are two potential film distribution companies. Film 4 develops and co-finances films with distinctive talent, operating with a mix of license fees and equity. It has produced acclaimed films like 12 Years a Slave and Slumdog Millionaire. The BFI uses lottery funds to support UK films and increase audiences. It has released films like The Changes and The Ghost Stories for Christmas. BBC Films co-produces around eight films annually with international partners. It aims to make strong British films while developing new talent. Potential films for each distributor are listed.
Bridget Jones’ Diary And Love Actually Marketing Compressed
The document discusses the marketing campaign for the 2001 film Bridget Jones's Diary, including tie-ins with brands like Virgin Atlantic and MSN, differing soundtrack tracklists for UK and US audiences, and music videos featuring Shelby Lyne, Gabrielle, and Geri Halliwell to appeal to various audiences. Product placements and promotional partnerships generated an estimated $10 million for the film's marketing.
Specimen paper 4
This document is a 4-page specimen exam paper for the Cambridge International A-Level Media Studies exam. It consists of instructions and 12 exam questions assessing students' skills development through coursework productions and understanding of contemporary media issues. Students must answer one question from Section A and one from Section B, referring to at least two different media and using contemporary examples to support their responses.
More Related Content
What's hot
Evaulation question 3
Is my film a British or Hollywood film? why? what distribution companies would be interested? what production companies would be interested?
Evaluation question 2
The document discusses potential distributors for an independent, low-budget film with a dark tone and 15 rating. It analyzes Warner Bros, Disney, Film4, and Microwave. Warner Bros and Disney are ruled out as they focus on big-budget blockbusters. Film4 and Microwave are presented as the most viable options as they specialize in smaller, British films and have experience supporting independent productions through funding and distribution. Microwave in particular offers financing up to £25,000 and has successfully distributed similar small, local films to UK audiences.
what kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
This document discusses different types of media institutions that could distribute an independent film product. It describes production companies, distributors, and limited distributors. Production companies are responsible for fundraising, budgeting, organizing production, and distributing the completed film. Distributors market and release films in theaters or on DVD/Blu-Ray. They work with exhibitors to show films in theaters and receive a percentage of ticket sales. The document also mentions the BFI film fund as a source of funding for independent UK films.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Entertainment Film Distributors would be the most suitable distribution company for the filmmaker's low-budget supernatural horror film. EFD specializes in distributing independent British films and has experience with horror genres like Saw and The Final Destination. They could help the film reach a large audience without a huge budget. StudioCanal UK and EFD both work with small British productions, but EFD may require less money to distribute and promote the film using social media.
Sam Bellman Institution Task
The document compares the low-budget film The Blair Witch Project and the high-budget film The Hangover in terms of their production companies, budgets, box office earnings, and target audiences. The Blair Witch Project was independently produced for $500,000-$750,000 by the little-known company Haxan and grossed $248 million worldwide. In contrast, The Hangover had a $35 million budget from the major studio Warner Bros and grossed $467.5 million. Haxan typically produces horror and thriller films for audiences 15 and older while Warner Bros produces a variety of genres targeting those 18 to 34.
Evaluation presentation media
Film 4 would be the most suitable media institution to distribute the film. As an independent British film made on a small budget, it would best fit the profile of films typically distributed by Film 4 rather than larger studios. Film 4 has experience distributing similar small, independent British films that achieved success, such as The Inbetweeners Movie. While other potential distributors like BBC Films or Entertainment Film Distributors may also be good fits and have advantages, Film 4 is a more realistic choice given the scale of the film and Film 4's track record of marketing and finding audiences for comparable films.
DISTRIBUTION
The production company handles fundraising, scheduling, budgeting, scripting, resources, staff organization, post-production, distribution, and marketing. They have chosen Film4 Productions as their distributor because it is known for supporting low-budget British films in similar genres like psychological horror. Due to their low budget and lack of stars, a large distributor like Universal would not be possible. They plan to apply to the British Film Institute for funding to produce and market the film since it is a low-budget British production that will likely only appeal to UK audiences.
Blog3
Left Films would be a suitable distributor for the film as they specialize in distributing low-budget horror and thriller films, including slasher films similar to the one being proposed. Hammer Films and Film 4 Productions could also effectively distribute the film given their experience producing successful horror films and willingness to work with lower budgets. Both companies have audiences interested in the thriller/horror genre and would help attract new viewers.
Blog3
A film distributor is responsible for marketing and distributing a film. They set the release date and choose how the film will be exhibited or made available for viewing, such as in cinemas or on DVD. Multinational distributors have larger budgets to distribute and promote films nationally or worldwide, while independent distributors have limited local promotion budgets. Left Films and Hammer Films are suggested as potential distributors for the filmmaker's slasher film because they specialize in low-budget horror and thriller genres. Film4 Productions is also proposed as they have successfully distributed similar films without any current competing titles.
ice production slideshow
A production company is responsible for developing and producing media projects like films, music, radio, and television. The document discusses ICE Production Company and its plans to produce a film. ICE Production Company chose not to use a logo and instead use the same font in its titles to tie the name to the film. It would use a film distributor to distribute, market, and handle the release strategy of the film. The distributor specializes in film distribution and would focus on large-scale marketing instead of ICE Production Company handling those tasks. For funding, ICE Production Company determined a smaller, British production company would be more suitable than a large Hollywood studio due to lower costs and tax allowances.
Ownership of the movie industry
Here is a presentation I have created for my A2 media coursework about ownership of the film industry
Task 3 ownership of movie indusrty.
This is a presentation on the ownership of how our movie trailer will be good in the business and also information about the big 6 compared to a independent movie studio. There is also information about the movie company Disney about the facts and figures.
Task 03 powerpoint
The production company is called Smiley Inc Productions and was named to create irony between the company and thriller films. Their logo is a scratchy, edgy smiley face that builds on the thriller genre. Film distributors market and promote films by deciding screenings, release dates, and number of copies. Film4 would likely distribute the film since they release similar thrillers and support low-budget British films. The British Film Institute funds low-budget British films and could provide lottery money to cover production and marketing costs.
Film Distribution for The Searchers
Our film production company, Sinuous Pictures, produces psychological thrillers. Due to producing this genre of film, potential distributors that may be interested include New Line Cinema and Rogue, both of which have experience distributing similar thriller films successfully. A distributor is responsible for distributing the film to audiences by deciding where and when it screens, promoting the film, and organizing home video releases. We aim to appeal to both UK and international audiences, especially English-speaking markets, by promoting the film widely across various countries.
Film Distribution
The document discusses film distribution and provides examples of both successful and unsuccessful distribution strategies. It explains that distribution is key to a film's success and involves negotiating deals with agencies to show the film in cinemas and on home video. A success story describes how Lionsgate's distribution of The Hunger Games propelled it to major studio status. A failure story outlines how a last-minute change to a one-day cinema release for Iron Sky hurt its earnings potential.
Film institutions media 1 (1)
Blue Dolphin is an independent film distribution company that has been distributing films since the mid-1980s. They look for a diverse range of films and have sold films to major broadcasters. As beginners, the filmmakers would need assistance that Blue Dolphin specializes in providing. The independent film company specializes in project development, production, distribution, sales and marketing. They work with independent filmmakers and have global connections. This company offers options to help independent films get distributed. The BFI is a charity-funded company that distributes and publishes films. It provides lottery funding to support independent film production and distribution. The BFI's criteria matches what the filmmakers are looking for in a distribution partner.
Task 7 film distribution companies
Warp X is a British independent film production and distribution company founded in 2005. They specialize in low-budget films and have distributed 10 films in the past 8 years, including the crime thriller Kill List in 2011. Their film budgets typically range from £400,000 to £800,000. Warp X supports new and independent directors and talents, in line with their goal of promoting the British film industry. They would be the most suitable distributor for a new independent British crime film due to their experience with low-budget films and niche audiences.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
This document discusses potential media institutions that could distribute an independent media product and why. It analyzes several distribution companies/labels including Film 4, Vertigo Films, DNA Films, and creating your own label called Pyramid Productions. While Film 4 may be too large, Vertigo Films and DNA Films are presented as more realistic options for small independent films. Creating your own label could allow for receiving all profits if successful but would be difficult to promote.
Question 1
Our film, titled "MINE" and about a stalker plotting to kill her ex's girlfriend, would be best distributed by Working Title due to their association with Universal Studios, which would provide access to American actors and a $35 million budget for production and marketing. Failing that, as a small independent production company, we would likely use smaller UK distributors like Warp X, Film4, or ones funded by the BFI and National Lottery, and submit our film to film festivals around the country.
Distribution Options
Film 4 and the BFI are two potential film distribution companies. Film 4 develops and co-finances films with distinctive talent, operating with a mix of license fees and equity. It has produced acclaimed films like 12 Years a Slave and Slumdog Millionaire. The BFI uses lottery funds to support UK films and increase audiences. It has released films like The Changes and The Ghost Stories for Christmas. BBC Films co-produces around eight films annually with international partners. It aims to make strong British films while developing new talent. Potential films for each distributor are listed.
What's hot (20)
what kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
what kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Viewers also liked
Bridget Jones’ Diary And Love Actually Marketing Compressed
The document discusses the marketing campaign for the 2001 film Bridget Jones's Diary, including tie-ins with brands like Virgin Atlantic and MSN, differing soundtrack tracklists for UK and US audiences, and music videos featuring Shelby Lyne, Gabrielle, and Geri Halliwell to appeal to various audiences. Product placements and promotional partnerships generated an estimated $10 million for the film's marketing.
Specimen paper 4
This document is a 4-page specimen exam paper for the Cambridge International A-Level Media Studies exam. It consists of instructions and 12 exam questions assessing students' skills development through coursework productions and understanding of contemporary media issues. Students must answer one question from Section A and one from Section B, referring to at least two different media and using contemporary examples to support their responses.
2014 G325 paper
This document contains exam questions for two sections - Section A on theoretical evaluation of media production, and Section B on contemporary media issues.
For Section A, question 1(a) asks students to describe important post-production decisions made for different media productions and explain their significance, referring to examples showing how skills developed over time. Question 1(b) asks students to apply the concept of genre to one of their coursework productions.
Section B questions address topics such as contemporary media regulation, the impact of global media, media and collective identity, online and postmodern media. Students must discuss statements and theories, using examples from media texts.
Applying bbfc ratings imdb parents guides for 6 films
This document provides examples of film descriptions for a student to review and assign BBFC ratings of 12, 15, or 18 based on the criteria for each rating. It includes 6 film descriptions without titles for the student to rate. After rating the films, the student can check their ratings against the BBFC case studies site or blogspot page that provides links to information on each film related to the appropriate BBFC rating.
Media NAS drive setup instructions
The document provides instructions for connecting to and accessing the MediaStudies drive from any Mac computer in room B122. It outlines steps to backup work, find folder structures for each year group and templates, and additional resources. The steps include opening Finder, connecting to the server with the address and login credentials provided, adding the MediaStudies folder to Favorites for easy access from any B122 Mac.
A2 Media Studies Revision Pack
The document provides information and advice for a Media Studies exam, including:
- The exam is worth 25% of the final grade and has two sections - theoretical evaluation of productions and contemporary media issues.
- Section A asks students to describe and evaluate the development of their skills over their AS and A2 production work, focusing on areas like digital technology, creativity, research and planning, and post-production.
- Advice is given on what to discuss for each skill area, with examples of how skills have progressed. Higher grades require evaluating the impact and importance of skill development rather than just describing it.
Viewers also liked (6)
Bridget Jones’ Diary And Love Actually Marketing Compressed
Bridget Jones’ Diary And Love Actually Marketing Compressed
Applying bbfc ratings imdb parents guides for 6 films
Applying bbfc ratings imdb parents guides for 6 films
Similar to For Those in Peril Case Study
Potential Distributors
Warp Films is an independent British film production and distribution company based in Sheffield that has successfully produced critically acclaimed low-budget films including comedies. Screen Gems is an American film distributor that has found success with similar low-budget films in the same genre. StudioCanal UK is a British company that has experience distributing crime-comedy films and would respect the British nature of the film.
Pride AS media exam case study
swdnjm jnhfgasdfibg]pb
#
asdkjdfsgohkj
the4 m eedia]#
hype
sdgoihnerw;fls
it'sa real
Pride case study
This film was produced by Calamity Films, an independent British production company. It was funded by several companies including BBC Films and BFI. The film was distributed in different countries and on different mediums by companies like Pathé, 20th Century Fox, and BBC Films. Pride was directed by Matthew Warchus and stars British actors Bill Nighy, Imelda Staunton, and Dominic West. It was promoted through trailers on social media and newspapers/magazine reviews. The film falls into the comedy-drama genre depicting a 1984 UK gay pride march. Although the UK box office gross was $6.3 million, the overall gross of $7.5 million was smaller than other films,
Audience and institution
This document discusses different types of film institutions and their approaches to targeting audiences. Mainstream film studios like Universal have larger budgets that allow for big stars, advanced technology, and widespread marketing campaigns. Their films can reach a broad audience as a result. In contrast, independent studios like Warp Films have much smaller budgets and must use raw materials and save costs. While their films may not get as much exposure, This is England was financially successful for Warp Films despite its low budget and niche genre. The document also notes that Working Title is partially owned by Universal, so they have a larger budget than a fully independent studio but not as large as a major Hollywood studio.
Warp and Working Titles
Warp Films and Working Titles are two British film production companies. Working Titles started as an independent company but was later bought by Universal Studios, giving it access to extensive international distribution. It produces films with well-known actors that have wide appeal. Warp Films is an independent company based in Sheffield and London that produces lower-budget films with less-known actors and more stylistic or controversial stories, relying on word-of-mouth for success. It distributes films more narrowly in the UK and Europe at first before expanding, if successful. Examples of films by each company, like Notting Hill and Submarine, illustrate their different approaches to production and distribution.
Media institutions
This document discusses different types of film distributors and their roles. It explains that distributors are responsible for marketing and releasing films in theaters and on DVD. It also discusses targeting either broad "tent-pole" global audiences or more niche domestic audiences. The document provides examples of different distributors like Film 4, Lionsgate, and Working Title, noting their budgets and audience reach. It concludes that due to the niche motorsports drama topic, the film discussed should seek funding from organizations like BFI/National Lottery that support independent low-budget films.
An introduction to British Cinema
Brief outline of how the British Film industry works including funding. Used as part of a WJEC Film Studies course
Media institutions
Vertigo Films is a successful British film production and distribution company that produces around 4 films per year, ranging in genre. Some of their most successful films include StreetDance 3D, which had a £3.5m budget and earned £11m, and Monsters, which was made for under £500,000 and earned $4.2m. Independent Films specializes in independent films but has had mixed financial success, such as We Need To Talk About Kevin which earned less than its $7m budget. Hammer Films is an ideal distributor for the document's horror film "Bird Call" due to its history of horror films and recent financial successes after being bought and revived in 2007, including The Woman in
task 03 group 003
A production company is responsible for the physical production of a film, including raising funds and presenting the completed film. The company named Howard Productions oversaw pre-production, production, and post-production of their low-budget film, which was distributed on YouTube. Their film would be suitable for a distributor like Pathe, which successfully distributed the low-budget horror film The Blair Witch Project that was funded through private investors with only $60,000.
Media production companies 12
Film 4 focuses on low budget British films and would be a good fit for the filmmaker's low budget British film. Vertigo Films has experience producing a hooligan film and could assist with production. While larger companies like Metro Goldwyn Mayer, Paramount, and Universal Studios are unlikely options due to their lack of experience with hooligan films and high costs of production.
Production companies
Film 4 focuses on low budget British films and would be a good fit for the filmmaker's low budget British hooligan film. Vertigo Films has experience producing a hooligan film and could assist with production, though larger companies like Metro Goldwyn Mayer, Paramount, and Universal would be too expensive and lack experience with the hooligan genre.
Media production companies
Film 4 focuses on low budget British films and would be a good fit for the filmmaker's low budget British hooligan film. Vertigo Films has experience producing a hooligan film and could assist with production, though larger companies like Metro Goldwyn Mayer, Paramount, and Universal would be too expensive and lack experience with the hooligan genre.
Warp film
Warp Film is an independent British film company based in London and Sheffield. As an independent studio, it has more limited funding than major studios but seeks financing from various UK film councils and organizations. It stresses the importance of using short films to impress potential funders and get noticed. Some of Warp Film's biggest successes include This Is England, which won several awards, and Submarine, which had a small £1.2 million budget but made over £2 million in profits. However, some of its films like Bunny and the Bull and Grow Your Own were financial flops. Warp Film's success is attributed to securing funding from multiple UK sources and producing low-budget films that are acclaimed and commercially successful.
Institutions brooke
Film 4 is a suitable institution for the filmmakers' opening because it produces similar possessive horror films that share characteristics with their film. Film 4 has experience creating low-budget British films through partnerships like Warp Films. It also has a target audience of teenagers, which matches the filmmakers' intended viewers. Research on Film 4's viewership and catalog of possessive horror films indicates it would provide a good platform to showcase their new film and help expand the genre's audience.
Institutions brooke
Film 4 is being considered as the institution to distribute the film group's new possessive horror film. Film 4 specializes in independent and international films, including horror, and has been successful in launching similar low-budget British films to wider audiences. It also targets the key teenage demographic that the film aims for. Research shows that Film 4 has a history of supporting possessive horror films and helping small production companies like Warp Films to make and distribute films. For these reasons, Film 4 appears well-suited to distribute the group's new film.
Evaluation 3
The document discusses choosing a media institution to distribute a British film. It analyzes potential distributors before selecting Film 4. Key reasons for choosing Film 4 include that it is a major name in British film distribution, has experience with similar films, invests £500,000 in productions, and owns popular TV channels for advertising and screening films. Other potential distributors like Working Title Films were rejected for not being a good fit for the film's genre.
Warp films
Warp Films is an independent UK film production company based in Sheffield and London. It was established by the founders of Warp Records to initially produce short films with financial support from NESTA. In 2005, Warp Films launched its own film distribution arm to distribute both its in-house productions and acquisitions from other European markets. It has distribution alliances with Optimum Releasing and Madman Entertainment. Warp Films was also involved in establishing Warp X, a digital film studio, and producing films like This Is England which had limited distribution due to budget constraints but marketing including a website, posters, and trailers to appeal to alternative audiences.
Institutions
This document discusses key aspects of producing an independent film, including institutions, funding, production values, marketing, similar products, and distribution. It would produce the film independently and seek co-funding from multiple companies. Around 50% of the budget would go towards production values like setting, lighting, and sound. Marketing would utilize film festivals and social media. The film's target audience of 30-40 year olds and university graduates would be reached through newspapers and online platforms. It would be distributed by StudioCanal UK, known for independent films.
The British and US Film Industry
The document discusses the history and development of the British and US film industries. It notes that the British film industry has experienced booms and recessions since the 1930s. Some of Britain's earliest successes included Alfred Hitchcock films in the 1930s. The industry then experienced a recession from the 1970s to 1990s. The 1990s saw a resurgence in successful British costume dramas and comedies such as Four Weddings and a Funeral and The Full Monty. Government support through organizations like the UK Film Council and National Lottery also contributed to the industry's renaissance. The document outlines ongoing debates around the type of films Britain should produce and discusses factors that define a "British film."
Film4 presentation
FILM 4 was established in 1982 by Channel 4 to produce diverse and challenging films. Originally known as FilmFour, it became Channel 4's second channel when it launched in 1998. Some notable films produced include Johnny English, Wild Child, The Soloist, and Slumdog Millionaire. FILM 4 targets both family audiences during the day with lighter films and older audiences at night with more mature films. The company invests around £500,000 in 20 films annually to develop British talent and supports international independent films through co-investments. It distributes its films through its free Channel 4 and FilmFour channels to attract viewers looking for free movie options.
Similar to For Those in Peril Case Study (20)
More from KShahMMAS
Social Class, Ethnicity, and Sexuality
This document discusses social class, ethnicity, and sexuality theories. It covers topics like how social class is defined by social, economic, and educational status; how media can influence dominant ideologies; representation of ethnic groups as exotic, dangerous, humorous, or pitied; and how gender and sexuality are socially constructed rather than biological. Key theorists mentioned include Stuart Hall, Gramsci, Marx, Alvarado, and Butler.
Proliferation of Hardware
IMAX introduced large-format, high-quality film viewing in 1967 that provided an immersive experience through large screens and surround sound. Digital video cameras, introduced in 1976, made filmmaking significantly cheaper than 35mm film but also enabled easier piracy. High-definition technology, introduced in 1979, provided higher quality viewing but was argued by some to be lower quality than 35mm film. The internet, introduced in 1982, provided many new opportunities for filmmakers and viewers to connect but also facilitated mass piracy through file sharing.
Regional Identities
This document discusses regional stereotypes and identities across different areas of the United Kingdom. It characterizes regions such as England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, North, South, London, Essex, Manchester, Liverpool, Newcastle, Yorkshire, Somerset based on perceived traits like class, accent, activities, fashion and scenery. It also contrasts stereotypes between groups, such as life being more work-focused in London versus pub-centered in Manchester, or behaviors being anti-social in Scotland versus pro-social in England.
Regional Identities
This document profiles regional identities and stereotypes across England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales. For England, it describes stereotypes about those from London as wealthy; the English south as educated and well-spoken; and the English north as uneducated and working class. For Scotland, common stereotypes include liking drinking and having red hair. Stereotypes are also listed for regions like Essex, Manchester, Liverpool, and Newcastle based on class, accents, fashion, and more.
Issues in film exhibition
Netflix and other online streaming services have become very popular in the UK, with Netflix gaining 1 million subscribers only 7 months after launching. While this transition to digital distribution and viewing is cheaper for studios, some directors argue it reduces the artistry of cinema by moving away from 35mm film. Additionally, the growth of piracy costs the creative industry £1.5 billion annually as illegal downloads and streaming sites tap into consumer demand that legitimate services have not met, threatening further job losses for retailers.
Technology in Film
Technology has significantly impacted the film industry in several ways:
- Films can now be shot and produced digitally at a much lower cost than traditional film methods. However, some directors argue this detracts from traditional techniques.
- Advances in technology have led to more ways for audiences to view films through various platforms like TV, video-on-demand, and online streaming services. However, this abundance of choice can be difficult for audiences to navigate.
- New technologies have disrupted traditional models of film financing and distribution by empowering audiences to help fund projects through sites like Kickstarter, putting pressure on established film companies.
Film Distribution
Film distribution involves marketing a film to audiences. The distributor estimates potential rental fees from exhibitors based on box office projections. Audience research through surveys helps distributors understand preferences and tailor marketing. Certification bodies like the BBFC rate films for certain ages, affecting the scope of their potential audience. Popular actors and directors can generate buzz, and the timing of a release is planned around factors like school holidays or awards season. Distributors produce and ship film prints to exhibitors to maximize showings across different locations.
Film exhibition
The BFI cinema in London has 7 screens of varying sizes, from 38 seats to 450 seats. It is categorized as a repertory or revival cinema that specializes in showing older, notable films. Located in central London, 80% of its films are from major Hollywood conglomerates rather than independent films. Over the next two weeks, it will be showing films from the 1950s to 1990s including Funny Face, Nebraska, Rome Open City, Donnie Brasco, and Calito's Way.
Anna Karenina Case Study
The film was produced by Universal Pictures, a major Hollywood studio that has significant funding resources. As a large conglomerate, Universal was able to self-finance the film and control its distribution to retain more profits. The film had a worldwide box office gross of $12.8 million, which was fairly large but not incredibly large for a Hollywood film. It was directed by Joe Wright and starred Kiera Knightly and Jude Law.
The King's Speech Case Study
The document discusses the 2010 film The King's Speech, including details about its production company The Weinstein Company, director Tom Hooper, and leading stars Colin Firth, Helena Bonham Carter, and Geoffrey Rush. It provides information on the film's critical reception, awards and accolades, box office performance, and genres. The King's Speech received widespread critical praise and won 4 Oscars, though it was only the 18th highest grossing film of 2010.
Hunger Games: Catching Fire Case Study
Lionsgate Entertainment funded and distributed The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, which had a budget of $130-140 million. It was directed by American director Nina Jacobson. Starring Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen, the film was a commercial and critical success, grossing $861 million worldwide and receiving numerous award nominations. Reviews praised the film, with an 89% critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes and it was the 4th highest grossing film of 2013.
Representation in TV Dramas
This document analyzes how different social groups are represented in various TV dramas through stereotypes. It discusses examples of upper and lower class characters from House of Cards and Breaking Bad and their symbolic clothing. It also examines representations of sexuality in Skins, disability in The Inbetweeners and Derek, regional identity in Our Friends in the North, age in Waterloo Road and Batman, ethnicity in The Wire and Homeland, and gender in The Office and Fringe. The document argues that many of these portrayals reinforce stereotypes through symbolic lighting, clothing, language and other visual cues.
Primeval
The document summarizes the TV show Primeval, describing its setting across urban London areas and prehistoric times through time rifts. A group of scientists work to stop the world's end caused by dinosaurs traveling through time rifts. While the narrative is outlandish as a sci-fi story, the main characters of a student and zookeeper feel realistic and relatable to create empathy with viewers.
Film consumption
The document discusses film consumption trends from 1997-2012 based on a survey. It finds that the 45 and over age group consumed the most films in 2012, a large 22 million film increase from 1997. The most popular genres among audiences were action, comedy and animation films, while drama, comedy and documentaries were the most popular releases. Cinema-going has increased after declining in 1945, and the white ethnicity dominates the film watching market while film video rentals have decreased significantly since 2004 due to the rise of video on demand services.
My Film Consumption
The document summarizes the films watched over the past year including 12 Years a Slave, Despicable Me, Toy Story, and LOL. It also outlines who films are watched with such as myself, family, and girlfriend. The technologies used to consume films are listed as Netflix, TV, cinema, and DVD. Information on how films are discovered like film news sites, word of mouth, and trailers is provided along with where films are consumed at home and cinema.
How did you address your audience?
The document discusses how a film addressed its target audience in its mise-en-scene and pace. It describes tailoring the costumes to the audience's socioeconomic background and setting to interest men. Feedback was received that it could have better included women, but the filmmakers chose to ignore this to keep the male-centric action pace they felt the target audience would prefer.
Question 2 - How does your media product represent particular social groups?
The characters are portrayed as young, white-collar male office workers of a similar socioeconomic class based on their costumes of white shirts, ties, trousers, and black shoes. Their friendly body language and dialogue establishes them as laid-back friends. However, when Mitch finds a letter, he becomes a countertype by revealing a secret that disrupts the audience's expectations and adds mystery, aligning with thriller film conventions. The filmmakers believe accurately portraying this change was successful based on audience feedback, though acknowledging negative countertypes could offend while an impersonal tone may prevent audience connection.
Film Proposal of The Virtuoso
This document provides a proposal for a short film called "The Virtuoso." It outlines the plot, which follows a man named Mitch who receives a mysterious letter that leads him to reconsider his formerly criminal past. It then lists the group roles and characters in the film, including descriptions of Mitch, his wife Rachel, the criminal leader Zeus, and Zeus's gang. It also details the planned locations, costumes, soundtrack, and post-production effects for the film.
More from KShahMMAS (18)
Question 2 - How does your media product represent particular social groups?
Question 2 - How does your media product represent particular social groups?
Recently uploaded
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
Stack Memory Organization of 8086 Microprocessor
The stack memory organization of 8086 microprocessor.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف أحرف الخلاف للقراء العشرةأعد أحرف الخلاف بالتلوين وصلا سمير بسيوني غفر الله له
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
IT WILL BE HELPFULL FOR THE NUSING STUDENTS
IT FOCUSED ON MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND NURSING MANAGEMENT.
HIGHLIGHTS ON HEALTH EDUCATION.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Recently uploaded (20)
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
For Those in Peril Case Study
- 2. Production Company The film is produced by Warp Films, an independent production company from Sheffield, UK. The film aims to produce quality film rather than selling in large quantity.
- 3. Funding The film was also funded by Warp Films. The film was funded a low budget of just £2mil, compared to Hollywood films like The Great Gatsby, which was budgeted £80mil. In comparison, this is a very low budget film.
- 4. Distribution - UK The film was distributed by Film 4, who are a British company that specialise in releasing high quality films for artistic reasons, much alike Warp do.
- 5. Budget The film was funded a low budget of just £2mil.
- 6. Box Office Gross N/A
- 7. Director The film was directed by a British director named Paul Wright, who has previously made a few artistic pieces. He shares very similar values to Warp and Film 4 in this way.
- 8. Actors Actors featured are not celebrities, and are all a low-paid cast. This is due to the low budget meaning non-recognisable faces would be the best option for the role, unlike a hollywood production that could afford A list celebs.
- 10. Promotion The film had reasonably low promotion, such as adverts on the film 4 channel and on it’s website. The film did not have any adverts aired on prime tv unlike hollywood productions might.
- 11. Genre The genre of the film is a drama, which for low budget, british films, is very conventional as it is something that does not require high budgets or special fx etc.