Flournoypresentation
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•415 views
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was passed in response to accounting scandals at Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco. It established new regulations and oversight for public company boards, management, and accounting firms. SOX requires companies to maintain records for audits for 5 years, and penalties include fines and imprisonment for destroying or covering up records to obstruct investigations. While it has increased investor protection, some argue it places too high a cost burden on small businesses.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Ethics And Morality in Business
The document discusses several corporate ethics scandals in the early 2000s that eroded public trust in businesses. It led to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 which aimed to improve financial disclosures, increase corporate responsibility and strengthen protections for whistleblowers and investors. However, more reforms were still needed to fully restore ethics and integrity in business practices.
HONORS Sarbanes-Oxley Act Aleksandar Krajisnik
The document discusses the significance of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which was enacted in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals in the early 2000s including Enron. It describes how Enron misstated expenses, used mark-to-market accounting to overstate asset values, and created fake partnerships to hide losses. This led to Enron's bankruptcy. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act aimed to restore investor confidence by strengthening corporate responsibility and financial disclosure standards. Key provisions included CEO/CFO certification of financial reports and increased regulation of accounting practices and auditors.
Liability of Directors in Canada – An Excerpt
This article is an excerpt of the Canada Chapter of International Liability of Corporate Directors, 2nd edition, published by Juris Publishing in February 2013. This excerpt excludes numerous aspects of the full chapter, particularly in reference to offering corporations, national corporate reporting, the supervisory role of the securities commissions, insider trading, prospectus violations, director loans and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and indemnification of officers and directors. Further, some sections have been abridged. The full article should be consulted for the omitted aspects and for a more complete analysis of the applicable law. This article is not legal advice and is intended solely as information. Further information can be obtained from the authors.
In Canada, there is a large body of statutory and common law which provides guidance about the standards of conduct expected from directors and attaches personal liability for failing to meet those standards. Directors now owe expanded duties to shareholders, employees, creditors, and other stakeholders and are increasingly being held personally responsible for the corporation’s conduct. Liability attaches under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA), and under provincial corporations acts, most of which are similar to the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA). This article deals only with liabilities under business corporations.
Law Firm Employment and Space Trends
The number of law firms and the total headcount of lawyers both have failed to keep pace with the growth observed in other professional and business service sectors, the majority of which have sharply rebounded in the wake of the recession. We suggest several reasons why the headcount of lawyers has stagnated over the past several years, and submit that the square footage currently occupied by law firms is likely to continue to decline over the next several years, though perhaps at a slower pace than has been the case recently.
236425643 case-study-1
This document summarizes a case study on the collapse of Enron Corporation. It provides background on Enron's rapid growth and success in the late 1990s as an energy company, but also describes how much of its reported profits were fictional due to fraudulent accounting practices. The summary outlines some of the major ethical issues involved, including accounting fraud, misleading financial disclosures, excessive executive compensation tied to stock performance, lack of oversight of risky derivatives trading, and 401k retirement plans that were heavily invested in Enron stock. The downfall of Enron in 2001 as the largest corporate bankruptcy at the time had wide-ranging impacts and led to new regulations and legislation to reform corporate accounting and governance.
The Enron Conspiracy
Enron was an energy company based in Houston that employed over 22,000 people and was named America's Most Innovative Company for six years. However, an investigation revealed that Enron had inflated profits and hid debts through offshore accounts and loopholes. This led to Enron filing for bankruptcy in 2001 and the conviction of 20 people involved in the fraud, including CEOs Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling. The scandal prompted reforms through the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to increase corporate responsibility and transparency.
B502 ethics lecture t005_rf
This document provides an overview of corporate governance and discusses key concepts and examples. It begins by defining corporate governance as the rules, processes and practices by which a company is directed and controlled. It then examines corporate governance practices in both the UK and US, highlighting the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in response to scandals like Enron. Examples like the Robert Maxwell and Enron scandals are discussed to showcase how weaknesses in governance can be exploited. The document concludes by outlining essential topics to explore in the next lecture such as the effectiveness of current governance structures.
Enron Scandal from Auditor's Perspective (F-310)
This presentation is basically on the Enron's scandal. Here the maximum focus is given to auditor's role in this fraud. Moreover, the management's role is also highlighted.
Recommended
Ethics And Morality in Business
The document discusses several corporate ethics scandals in the early 2000s that eroded public trust in businesses. It led to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 which aimed to improve financial disclosures, increase corporate responsibility and strengthen protections for whistleblowers and investors. However, more reforms were still needed to fully restore ethics and integrity in business practices.
HONORS Sarbanes-Oxley Act Aleksandar Krajisnik
The document discusses the significance of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which was enacted in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals in the early 2000s including Enron. It describes how Enron misstated expenses, used mark-to-market accounting to overstate asset values, and created fake partnerships to hide losses. This led to Enron's bankruptcy. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act aimed to restore investor confidence by strengthening corporate responsibility and financial disclosure standards. Key provisions included CEO/CFO certification of financial reports and increased regulation of accounting practices and auditors.
Liability of Directors in Canada – An Excerpt
This article is an excerpt of the Canada Chapter of International Liability of Corporate Directors, 2nd edition, published by Juris Publishing in February 2013. This excerpt excludes numerous aspects of the full chapter, particularly in reference to offering corporations, national corporate reporting, the supervisory role of the securities commissions, insider trading, prospectus violations, director loans and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and indemnification of officers and directors. Further, some sections have been abridged. The full article should be consulted for the omitted aspects and for a more complete analysis of the applicable law. This article is not legal advice and is intended solely as information. Further information can be obtained from the authors.
In Canada, there is a large body of statutory and common law which provides guidance about the standards of conduct expected from directors and attaches personal liability for failing to meet those standards. Directors now owe expanded duties to shareholders, employees, creditors, and other stakeholders and are increasingly being held personally responsible for the corporation’s conduct. Liability attaches under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA), and under provincial corporations acts, most of which are similar to the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA). This article deals only with liabilities under business corporations.
Law Firm Employment and Space Trends
The number of law firms and the total headcount of lawyers both have failed to keep pace with the growth observed in other professional and business service sectors, the majority of which have sharply rebounded in the wake of the recession. We suggest several reasons why the headcount of lawyers has stagnated over the past several years, and submit that the square footage currently occupied by law firms is likely to continue to decline over the next several years, though perhaps at a slower pace than has been the case recently.
236425643 case-study-1
This document summarizes a case study on the collapse of Enron Corporation. It provides background on Enron's rapid growth and success in the late 1990s as an energy company, but also describes how much of its reported profits were fictional due to fraudulent accounting practices. The summary outlines some of the major ethical issues involved, including accounting fraud, misleading financial disclosures, excessive executive compensation tied to stock performance, lack of oversight of risky derivatives trading, and 401k retirement plans that were heavily invested in Enron stock. The downfall of Enron in 2001 as the largest corporate bankruptcy at the time had wide-ranging impacts and led to new regulations and legislation to reform corporate accounting and governance.
The Enron Conspiracy
Enron was an energy company based in Houston that employed over 22,000 people and was named America's Most Innovative Company for six years. However, an investigation revealed that Enron had inflated profits and hid debts through offshore accounts and loopholes. This led to Enron filing for bankruptcy in 2001 and the conviction of 20 people involved in the fraud, including CEOs Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling. The scandal prompted reforms through the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to increase corporate responsibility and transparency.
B502 ethics lecture t005_rf
This document provides an overview of corporate governance and discusses key concepts and examples. It begins by defining corporate governance as the rules, processes and practices by which a company is directed and controlled. It then examines corporate governance practices in both the UK and US, highlighting the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in response to scandals like Enron. Examples like the Robert Maxwell and Enron scandals are discussed to showcase how weaknesses in governance can be exploited. The document concludes by outlining essential topics to explore in the next lecture such as the effectiveness of current governance structures.
Enron Scandal from Auditor's Perspective (F-310)
This presentation is basically on the Enron's scandal. Here the maximum focus is given to auditor's role in this fraud. Moreover, the management's role is also highlighted.
Worldcom Scandal
WorldCom announced in June 2002 that it intended to restate its financial statements for 2001 and Q1 2002, revealing $3.8 billion in improper accounting transfers from line cost expenses to asset accounts. Less than a month later, WorldCom filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It was subsequently discovered that an additional $3.8 billion in earnings had been improperly reported from 1999-Q1 2002. The fraud was carried out through improper reductions of line costs and false revenue adjustments. Key players involved included CEO Bernard Ebbers and CFO Scott Sullivan. The toxic culture and lack of board oversight enabled the massive accounting fraud.
Enron
This document summarizes lessons learned from the Enron scandal. Some key points:
- Enron collapsed in 2001 after a major accounting fraud, becoming the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history at the time and wiping out billions in shareholder wealth.
- The scandal exposed widespread corruption and lack of ethics at Enron, including executives profiting while employees lost pensions.
- It also revealed complicity of other organizations like governments, analysts, and business schools in propping up Enron's image without oversight of their business practices.
- In the aftermath, reforms like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act aimed to improve financial reporting and accountability, but more work is still needed to integrate
Wagner LLC Paper - FINAL DRAFT
The document discusses New York LLC law and whether amendments should be made, especially regarding dissolution. It provides background on LLC law and notes issues like ambiguity around dissolution standards. The key points are:
1) New York LLC law allows for judicial dissolution if "not reasonably practicable to carry on business." However, the meaning of this standard is unclear.
2) Unlike corporate law, LLC law does not address dissolution for fraud, illegality or oppression of members.
3) Courts have interpreted the standard differently, creating conflicting case law, as the legislature has not clarified or amended the law in over 15 years.
Shumaker 250
Shumaker is one of the 250 largest law firms in the United States according to the 2009 National Law Journal ranking by size. The firm is in good company among large law practices. The short document notes Shumaker's national ranking and that it is considered among the top law firms by size in the country.
Enron scandal Assignment / Report. By A. K. M. Sultan Mahmud Faisal
The document discusses the Enron scandal that occurred in 2001 and led to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It also discusses SAP/ERP systems. The Enron scandal involved accounting fraud that ultimately led to the bankruptcy of Enron. In response, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to increase transparency and prevent future accounting fraud. The Act introduced new regulations around corporate responsibility, criminal penalties, accounting practices, and protections for whistleblowers. It also mandated requirements for record keeping and internal controls. Finally, the document provides an overview of how SAP/ERP systems work at large companies through their three-tier architecture involving presentation, application, and database layers.
Case Study, Enron's Fraud
This document provides an overview of Enron's fraud scandal and case study. It discusses Enron's history as a large energy corporation that collapsed in 2001 due to widespread corporate fraud. It examines the unethical behaviors that took place, such as removing debts from financial statements and executives selling stock before the scandal broke. The document also considers the impact on stakeholders, compares the legal consequences faced by those involved, and provides recommendations for actions around ethics and whistleblowing going forward.
Enron scandal
The document provides an overview of the Enron scandal from a corporate perspective. It discusses Enron's origins and growth into one of the largest energy companies in the world. It then examines the accounting fraud and deception that took place, hiding billions in losses and debts through off-balance sheet entities. Key people like CEO Ken Lay and CFO Andrew Fastow benefited greatly from these actions. The scandal broke in late 2001, wiping out billions in market value and causing thousands of layoffs. It shook confidence in corporate accounting practices and led to new regulations like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Enron, ethics and organizational culture
Enron was an energy company that collapsed in 2001 due to an accounting fraud scandal. On the surface, Enron had strong ethics and compliance programs, including a code of ethics and training led by top executives. However, the company's culture ultimately allowed unethical behavior. The complex accounting and lack of transparency enabled managers to misrepresent Enron's financial performance. While there were rules in place, the culture did not truly emphasize integrity and accountability. Employees may not have wanted to contradict bosses or admit to irrational decisions. An ethical culture requires employees to feel responsible for their own actions and others', to freely raise issues without fear, for managers to lead by example and communicate the importance of integrity in difficult decisions. Enron's culture
Enron scandal
A presentation from the Audit Perspective covering in detail the Enron Scandal, the parties involved, what should have been done, etc.
Bcg Candidate Core Story V
A discussion of the best way to get a job using an attorney recruiter or a legal recruiter. The best way to find attorney jobs with an attorney recruiter.
Corporate Governance Lessons from Enron
The document discusses the Enron scandal and the resulting reforms. It analyzes Enron's risk management failures and ethical shortcomings like conflicts of interest between executives and accounting firms. While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act addressed disclosure and certification requirements, the document argues the reforms did not fully address the root causes of Enron's collapse related to negligence of risk management and misconduct. This is evidenced by later financial crises still exhibiting corporate governance failures despite the reforms. In conclusion, the document states Enron's board failed to properly monitor executives and the true issue remains a lack of ethics, not rules and regulations.
Comparative corporate governance The Enron Debacle
This document summarizes a paper on corporate governance practices post-Enron. It provides background on Enron's history and collapse. Key factors identified include aggressive accounting that hid debts, lack of board oversight, conflicts of interest with auditor Arthur Andersen, and failure of regulators to prevent the fraud. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed new rules for boards, auditors, and executives in response. Companies now face greater disclosure requirements and scrutiny of compensation and conflicts to restore investor confidence after the Enron scandal.
Andersen
Arthur Andersen was one of the "Big Five" accounting firms until its collapse in 2002 following accounting scandals. Pressure to generate revenue led Andersen to indulge in accounting irregularities and pursue high-risk clients without proper oversight. Its cozy relationship with Enron, including sending inexperienced auditors and destroying documents during investigations, ultimately led to its ban from auditing public companies and bankruptcy. Deficiencies in Andersen's culture, conflicts of interest from non-audit services, lack of independence, and long client tenures all contributed to its audit failures and downfall.
Cost benefits of sox compliance
The purpose of this paper to highlight key rules introduced in Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 and cost/benefits of compliance process.
Lyncheski - Hottest legal hr issues
The document discusses emerging legal issues for HR in 2011 and beyond, focusing on wage and hour lawsuits, healthcare industry vulnerabilities, and changes under the new presidential administration that may affect labor laws. It notes increased DOL enforcement of FLSA, new interpretations of FMLA and persuader rules, and expected NLRB rule changes to expedite union elections.
Enron assignment rouad_final
This document provides background information on the Enron accounting scandal. It discusses Enron's history and expansion into new businesses in the 1990s and 2000s. It describes how Enron used mark-to-market accounting and special purpose entities to hide debts and inflate profits. When Enron's financial issues came to light in late 2001, it filed for bankruptcy in December 2001. Its auditor, Arthur Andersen, was also implicated for destroying Enron documents.
Credit rating
This document discusses credit ratings and factors that affect them. It begins with an introduction to credit ratings as assessments of creditworthiness that are conducted by agencies like Standard & Poor's and Moody's. It then discusses the history of credit ratings beginning in 1909 and their increased importance after rules in 1936 required considering ratings for investments. The document outlines several key points about why credit ratings are important for determining loan approval and interest rates, bond purchases, and their impact on markets. It closes by listing factors agencies examine like payment history and economic potential and tips for maintaining high credit scores.
OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-owned enterprises: the instr...
Panel 4: Dr. Ashraf GAMAL CEO, Hawkamah Institute for Corporate Governance, "OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-owned enterprises: the instrument and its 2015 revision"; Enhancing Integrity for Business Development in the Middle East and North Africa, 18 April 2016, Paris, France, Session 4
abstract OECD Board Practices Session 2015_Pedone_UniversRomaTre
The document discusses corporate governance practices related to executive compensation and risk management. It notes that the financial crisis highlighted challenges with boards effectively overseeing executive pay, in particular how compensation incentives are aligned with long-term company interests according to its risk appetite. The OECD principles state that boards are responsible for aligning executive pay with long-term shareholder interests. Several countries have adopted policies like clawbacks and say-on-pay votes to strengthen the link between pay and performance. Most companies have established remuneration committees, though some smaller boards oversee compensation collectively.
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (by Naira Matevosyan)
This compact presentation elucidates the key elements of the Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act, and contemporary inquires related to it, such as steps the corporations should take to comply with the Act and whether or not, the Act has solved all the problems it was intended to address? DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1049.9923
The sarbanes oxley act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) established new regulations regarding corporate governance and financial disclosures. It contains eleven titles addressing issues like corporate responsibility, enhanced financial disclosures, and criminal penalties. Key sections require CEOs and CFOs to personally certify financial reports, mandate timely disclosure of material financial events, establish rules around off-balance sheet transactions, and require management to assess internal controls over financial reporting. The act also makes it a crime to alter or destroy audit documents to obstruct an investigation.
The new institutional economics of markets
The document discusses the new institutional economics perspective on markets. It begins by outlining the assumptions of traditional neoclassical economics, which assumes perfect information and zero transaction costs. It then introduces new institutional economics, which recognizes positive transaction costs and how institutional arrangements help address issues like asset specificity, uncertainty, and coordination problems. The document outlines different types of institutional arrangements like markets, hierarchies, and hybrid forms, and how the attributes of transactions influence the choice of arrangement. Finally, it discusses implications for understanding value chains and innovation platforms.
More Related Content
What's hot
Worldcom Scandal
WorldCom announced in June 2002 that it intended to restate its financial statements for 2001 and Q1 2002, revealing $3.8 billion in improper accounting transfers from line cost expenses to asset accounts. Less than a month later, WorldCom filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It was subsequently discovered that an additional $3.8 billion in earnings had been improperly reported from 1999-Q1 2002. The fraud was carried out through improper reductions of line costs and false revenue adjustments. Key players involved included CEO Bernard Ebbers and CFO Scott Sullivan. The toxic culture and lack of board oversight enabled the massive accounting fraud.
Enron
This document summarizes lessons learned from the Enron scandal. Some key points:
- Enron collapsed in 2001 after a major accounting fraud, becoming the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history at the time and wiping out billions in shareholder wealth.
- The scandal exposed widespread corruption and lack of ethics at Enron, including executives profiting while employees lost pensions.
- It also revealed complicity of other organizations like governments, analysts, and business schools in propping up Enron's image without oversight of their business practices.
- In the aftermath, reforms like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act aimed to improve financial reporting and accountability, but more work is still needed to integrate
Wagner LLC Paper - FINAL DRAFT
The document discusses New York LLC law and whether amendments should be made, especially regarding dissolution. It provides background on LLC law and notes issues like ambiguity around dissolution standards. The key points are:
1) New York LLC law allows for judicial dissolution if "not reasonably practicable to carry on business." However, the meaning of this standard is unclear.
2) Unlike corporate law, LLC law does not address dissolution for fraud, illegality or oppression of members.
3) Courts have interpreted the standard differently, creating conflicting case law, as the legislature has not clarified or amended the law in over 15 years.
Shumaker 250
Shumaker is one of the 250 largest law firms in the United States according to the 2009 National Law Journal ranking by size. The firm is in good company among large law practices. The short document notes Shumaker's national ranking and that it is considered among the top law firms by size in the country.
Enron scandal Assignment / Report. By A. K. M. Sultan Mahmud Faisal
The document discusses the Enron scandal that occurred in 2001 and led to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It also discusses SAP/ERP systems. The Enron scandal involved accounting fraud that ultimately led to the bankruptcy of Enron. In response, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to increase transparency and prevent future accounting fraud. The Act introduced new regulations around corporate responsibility, criminal penalties, accounting practices, and protections for whistleblowers. It also mandated requirements for record keeping and internal controls. Finally, the document provides an overview of how SAP/ERP systems work at large companies through their three-tier architecture involving presentation, application, and database layers.
Case Study, Enron's Fraud
This document provides an overview of Enron's fraud scandal and case study. It discusses Enron's history as a large energy corporation that collapsed in 2001 due to widespread corporate fraud. It examines the unethical behaviors that took place, such as removing debts from financial statements and executives selling stock before the scandal broke. The document also considers the impact on stakeholders, compares the legal consequences faced by those involved, and provides recommendations for actions around ethics and whistleblowing going forward.
Enron scandal
The document provides an overview of the Enron scandal from a corporate perspective. It discusses Enron's origins and growth into one of the largest energy companies in the world. It then examines the accounting fraud and deception that took place, hiding billions in losses and debts through off-balance sheet entities. Key people like CEO Ken Lay and CFO Andrew Fastow benefited greatly from these actions. The scandal broke in late 2001, wiping out billions in market value and causing thousands of layoffs. It shook confidence in corporate accounting practices and led to new regulations like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Enron, ethics and organizational culture
Enron was an energy company that collapsed in 2001 due to an accounting fraud scandal. On the surface, Enron had strong ethics and compliance programs, including a code of ethics and training led by top executives. However, the company's culture ultimately allowed unethical behavior. The complex accounting and lack of transparency enabled managers to misrepresent Enron's financial performance. While there were rules in place, the culture did not truly emphasize integrity and accountability. Employees may not have wanted to contradict bosses or admit to irrational decisions. An ethical culture requires employees to feel responsible for their own actions and others', to freely raise issues without fear, for managers to lead by example and communicate the importance of integrity in difficult decisions. Enron's culture
Enron scandal
A presentation from the Audit Perspective covering in detail the Enron Scandal, the parties involved, what should have been done, etc.
Bcg Candidate Core Story V
A discussion of the best way to get a job using an attorney recruiter or a legal recruiter. The best way to find attorney jobs with an attorney recruiter.
Corporate Governance Lessons from Enron
The document discusses the Enron scandal and the resulting reforms. It analyzes Enron's risk management failures and ethical shortcomings like conflicts of interest between executives and accounting firms. While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act addressed disclosure and certification requirements, the document argues the reforms did not fully address the root causes of Enron's collapse related to negligence of risk management and misconduct. This is evidenced by later financial crises still exhibiting corporate governance failures despite the reforms. In conclusion, the document states Enron's board failed to properly monitor executives and the true issue remains a lack of ethics, not rules and regulations.
Comparative corporate governance The Enron Debacle
This document summarizes a paper on corporate governance practices post-Enron. It provides background on Enron's history and collapse. Key factors identified include aggressive accounting that hid debts, lack of board oversight, conflicts of interest with auditor Arthur Andersen, and failure of regulators to prevent the fraud. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed new rules for boards, auditors, and executives in response. Companies now face greater disclosure requirements and scrutiny of compensation and conflicts to restore investor confidence after the Enron scandal.
Andersen
Arthur Andersen was one of the "Big Five" accounting firms until its collapse in 2002 following accounting scandals. Pressure to generate revenue led Andersen to indulge in accounting irregularities and pursue high-risk clients without proper oversight. Its cozy relationship with Enron, including sending inexperienced auditors and destroying documents during investigations, ultimately led to its ban from auditing public companies and bankruptcy. Deficiencies in Andersen's culture, conflicts of interest from non-audit services, lack of independence, and long client tenures all contributed to its audit failures and downfall.
Cost benefits of sox compliance
The purpose of this paper to highlight key rules introduced in Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 and cost/benefits of compliance process.
Lyncheski - Hottest legal hr issues
The document discusses emerging legal issues for HR in 2011 and beyond, focusing on wage and hour lawsuits, healthcare industry vulnerabilities, and changes under the new presidential administration that may affect labor laws. It notes increased DOL enforcement of FLSA, new interpretations of FMLA and persuader rules, and expected NLRB rule changes to expedite union elections.
Enron assignment rouad_final
This document provides background information on the Enron accounting scandal. It discusses Enron's history and expansion into new businesses in the 1990s and 2000s. It describes how Enron used mark-to-market accounting and special purpose entities to hide debts and inflate profits. When Enron's financial issues came to light in late 2001, it filed for bankruptcy in December 2001. Its auditor, Arthur Andersen, was also implicated for destroying Enron documents.
What's hot (16)
Enron scandal Assignment / Report. By A. K. M. Sultan Mahmud Faisal
Enron scandal Assignment / Report. By A. K. M. Sultan Mahmud Faisal
Comparative corporate governance The Enron Debacle
Comparative corporate governance The Enron Debacle
Viewers also liked
Credit rating
This document discusses credit ratings and factors that affect them. It begins with an introduction to credit ratings as assessments of creditworthiness that are conducted by agencies like Standard & Poor's and Moody's. It then discusses the history of credit ratings beginning in 1909 and their increased importance after rules in 1936 required considering ratings for investments. The document outlines several key points about why credit ratings are important for determining loan approval and interest rates, bond purchases, and their impact on markets. It closes by listing factors agencies examine like payment history and economic potential and tips for maintaining high credit scores.
OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-owned enterprises: the instr...
Panel 4: Dr. Ashraf GAMAL CEO, Hawkamah Institute for Corporate Governance, "OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-owned enterprises: the instrument and its 2015 revision"; Enhancing Integrity for Business Development in the Middle East and North Africa, 18 April 2016, Paris, France, Session 4
abstract OECD Board Practices Session 2015_Pedone_UniversRomaTre
The document discusses corporate governance practices related to executive compensation and risk management. It notes that the financial crisis highlighted challenges with boards effectively overseeing executive pay, in particular how compensation incentives are aligned with long-term company interests according to its risk appetite. The OECD principles state that boards are responsible for aligning executive pay with long-term shareholder interests. Several countries have adopted policies like clawbacks and say-on-pay votes to strengthen the link between pay and performance. Most companies have established remuneration committees, though some smaller boards oversee compensation collectively.
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (by Naira Matevosyan)
This compact presentation elucidates the key elements of the Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act, and contemporary inquires related to it, such as steps the corporations should take to comply with the Act and whether or not, the Act has solved all the problems it was intended to address? DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1049.9923
The sarbanes oxley act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) established new regulations regarding corporate governance and financial disclosures. It contains eleven titles addressing issues like corporate responsibility, enhanced financial disclosures, and criminal penalties. Key sections require CEOs and CFOs to personally certify financial reports, mandate timely disclosure of material financial events, establish rules around off-balance sheet transactions, and require management to assess internal controls over financial reporting. The act also makes it a crime to alter or destroy audit documents to obstruct an investigation.
The new institutional economics of markets
The document discusses the new institutional economics perspective on markets. It begins by outlining the assumptions of traditional neoclassical economics, which assumes perfect information and zero transaction costs. It then introduces new institutional economics, which recognizes positive transaction costs and how institutional arrangements help address issues like asset specificity, uncertainty, and coordination problems. The document outlines different types of institutional arrangements like markets, hierarchies, and hybrid forms, and how the attributes of transactions influence the choice of arrangement. Finally, it discusses implications for understanding value chains and innovation platforms.
Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002
The document discusses the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), which was passed in response to corporate accounting scandals in the United States. It summarizes some key provisions of SOX, including requiring full financial disclosure from public companies and being applicable to companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges. While India already had its own corporate laws, the document argues some aspects of SOX like increased penalties for white collar crimes could strengthen Indian laws as well. It also notes Clause 49 of Securities and Exchange Board of India attempted to improve corporate governance in a manner similar to SOX.
Corporate governace Practices in India
The document evaluates corporate governance practices in India from 2005 to 2012 based on data from the Asian Corporate Governance Association's CG Watch reports. It finds that India scored 61 in 2005, ranking 3rd, and 56 in 2007, also ranking 3rd. However, India's scores and rankings declined in subsequent years to 49 in 2010 and 51 in 2012, ranking 7th both years. While India made progress in some areas like rules formulation, there is still room for improvement in enforcement and culture. The study analyzed various elements of corporate governance annually to assess India's practices over the period studied.
Whistle Blower Policy
The document outlines NTPC Ltd's Whistleblower Policy. Some key points:
- The policy allows employees to secretly report unethical acts, malpractices, corruption or violations occurring within the company.
- It protects genuine whistleblowers from reprisals or victimization for blowing the whistle in good faith.
- The policy aims to strengthen transparency and integrity within the organization while providing employees a mechanism to report issues.
- Investigations will be launched if initial reviews find that allegations constitute improper activity that can be investigated. Whistleblowers and subjects will be protected and have certain rights during the investigation process.
Corporate Governance class 3
The document discusses the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico caused by BP. It describes how the spill occurred from the drilling rig and impacted the environment. Over time, BP has spent billions in cleanup costs and restoring damage, but up to 75% of spilled oil remains in the Gulf posing continuing risks. The summary emphasizes the ongoing environmental dangers and BP's need to further address remaining oil impacts.
Board of Directors: Selection, Compensation, and Removal - Quick Guide
Board of Directors: Selection, Compensation, and Removal - Quick GuideStanford GSB Corporate Governance Research Initiative
A board of directors requires professionals with a diverse mix of managerial, functional, and other specialized knowledge in order to properly advise and oversee management.
This Quick Guide reviews the process by which companies select, compensate, and evaluate board members.
It answers such questions as:
• How are qualified directors identified?
• What skills and experiences are needed?
• How are directors paid?
• How are directors evaluated?
• How are “bad” directors removed?
For an expanded discussion, see Corporate Governance Matters: A Closer Look at Organizational Choices and Their Consequences (Second Edition) by David Larcker and Brian Tayan (2015): http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/books/corporate-governance-matters-closer-look-organizational-choices
Buy This Book: http://www.ftpress.com/store/corporate-governance-matters-a-closer-look-at-organizational-9780134031569
For permissions to use this material, please contact: E: corpgovernance@gsb.stanford.edu
Copyright 2015 by David F. Larcker and Brian Tayan. All rights reserved.
Good Corporate Governance
This document discusses good corporate governance and its principles. It provides background on how corporate governance started in Indonesia in response to the 1997 Asian financial crisis. It then defines corporate governance based on several international organizations and outlines the 7 principles of good corporate governance according to the OECD, FCGI, IICG, KNKG, UNDP, BPKP, and UNESCAP. Finally, it discusses PT Pos Indonesia's implementation of corporate governance based on 5 principles of transparency, responsibility, and fairness.
Removal of directors
There are three ways a company director can be removed:
1. By shareholders through an ordinary resolution with proper notice and opportunity for the director to be heard.
2. By the central government on recommendation from the high court if the director is found unfit for office based on grounds like oppression or mismanagement.
3. By the Company Law Board/Tribunal through reconstituting the board if oppression or mismanagement of shareholders is found upon application from shareholders. Removed directors may be barred from managerial roles for 5 years without court approval.
Corporate governance oecd principles sep 2015
This document summarizes the six key principles of corporate governance as established by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). It outlines the principles of ensuring an effective governance framework, equitable treatment of shareholders, the role of institutional investors and intermediaries, consideration of stakeholder interests, disclosure and transparency, and board responsibilities. The principles call for legal and regulatory frameworks that promote transparency and market integrity, protection of shareholder rights, management of conflicts of interest, fair treatment of all stakeholders, and establishment of ethical standards and oversight by boards of directors.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
This document summarizes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which aimed to reform corporate governance and enhance financial disclosures. It discusses the major elements and titles of the act, including establishing the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, increasing auditor independence, enhancing corporate responsibility and financial disclosures, and increasing penalties for white collar crimes and fraud. Key sections are also summarized, such as sections related to internal controls, off-balance sheet items, assessing internal controls, financial disclosures, criminal penalties, and CEO/CFO certification of financial reports.
REVISED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE NORMS - CLAUSE 49 OF LISTING AGREEMENT
REVISED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE NORMS RECOMMENDED BY SEBI IN ITS BOARD MEETING HELD ON 13th FEB., 2014.
THESE NORMS WOULD BE APPLICABLE FROM 1st OCT. 2014
Sarbanes-Oxley act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted in response to several major corporate accounting scandals to increase corporate accountability and protect investors. It created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee accounting firms and audit quality. It also mandated executive responsibility for financial reports, independent audits of public companies, real-time disclosure of insider stock trades, limits on non-audit services by auditing firms, and criminal penalties for erasing records or destroying evidence of fraudulent financial reports. The Act aimed to restore investor confidence in the integrity of financial markets through heightened transparency and accountability.
SOX compliance - Understanding Sarbanes-Oxley
Sarbanes-Oxley was passed in the wake of a number of notable corporate accounting scandals including Enron and WorldCom.
And now in this training presentation, you will understand why and how this is important for us.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
The document discusses the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) passed in 2002 in response to several major corporate accounting scandals. SOX aimed to restore confidence by requiring stricter financial disclosures, independent audits of internal controls, corporate fraud accountability, and protections for whistleblowers. Key aspects of SOX include CEO/CFO certification of financial reports, management assessment of internal controls, auditor oversight, and analysis of potential conflicts of interest for securities analysts.
CLAUSE 49 OF SEBI LISTING AGREEMENTS
The document summarizes amendments to Clause 49 of the listing agreement with SEBI regarding corporate governance. Key points include:
1) The amendments aim to strengthen corporate governance frameworks and protect minority shareholder rights in line with the new Companies Act.
2) Board composition requirements include having at least one woman director and 50% non-executive directors, including a minimum of one-third independent directors.
3) Independent directors must meet stringent criteria and are limited to a five-year term with the option of reappointment through a special resolution.
4) Other requirements include minimum board and committee meetings, separate meetings for independent directors, constitution of audit and other mandatory committees.
5) Extensive disclosure
Viewers also liked (20)
OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-owned enterprises: the instr...
OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-owned enterprises: the instr...
abstract OECD Board Practices Session 2015_Pedone_UniversRomaTre
abstract OECD Board Practices Session 2015_Pedone_UniversRomaTre
Board of Directors: Selection, Compensation, and Removal - Quick Guide
Board of Directors: Selection, Compensation, and Removal - Quick Guide
REVISED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE NORMS - CLAUSE 49 OF LISTING AGREEMENT
REVISED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE NORMS - CLAUSE 49 OF LISTING AGREEMENT
Similar to Flournoypresentation
Analysis Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in 2002 in response to major corporate and accounting scandals to increase transparency and accuracy in corporate financial reporting. SOX holds CEOs and CFOs responsible for financial reports, requires external audits of public companies, and increases penalties for providing fraudulent financial information. A recent study found that CFOs of companies with strong internal financial controls saw increased compensation after SOX, while CFOs of companies reporting internal control problems incurred pay reductions. SOX also aimed to improve auditor independence and increase board oversight of executive activities.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Essay
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in 2002 in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom. It established new regulations and standards for public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. SOX aims to improve corporate governance and financial disclosures to protect investors and restore public trust in the securities markets. Key provisions of SOX include CEO/CFO certification of financial reports, requirements for external audits, auditor independence standards, and criminal penalties for compliance failures.
The Sarbanes Oxley Act 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was passed in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals. It aimed to increase corporate accountability and help restore investor confidence. Key provisions of SOX include the establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee audits of public companies, certifications of financial reports by CEOs and CFOs, restrictions on auditing and consulting services provided by accounting firms, disclosure of codes of ethics and whistleblower protections, among others. The goal of SOX was to better protect investors and improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Summary
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was implemented to restore investor confidence in the wake of major corporate accounting scandals. It aims to improve corporate governance and financial disclosure. The act establishes new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. It requires companies and their executives to be more responsible and transparent in their financial reporting.
Sarbanes Oxley Act Of 2002 (SOX)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was enacted in response to major corporate accounting scandals to increase accountability and enhance disclosure among public companies. SOX established new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms regarding financial disclosures. It aimed to restore public confidence in corporate governance by implementing financial oversight and introducing criminal penalties for noncompliance.
Chapter 4 The Institutionalization of Business Ethics 107.docx
Chapter 4: The Institutionalization of Business Ethics 107
services use the same letter grades, but use various combinations of upper- and lowercase
letters to differentiate themselves.
As early as 2003, financial analysts and the three global rating firms suspected that there
were some major problems with the way their models were assessing risk. In 2005, Standard
& Poor’s realized that its algorithm for estimating the risks associated with debt packages was
flawed. As a result, it asked for comments on improving its equations. In 2006–2007 many
governmental regulators and others started to realize what the rating agencies had known for
years: Their ratings were not very accurate. One report stated that the high ratings given to
debt were based on inadequate historical data and companies were ratings shopping between
companies so as to obtain the best rating possible. It was found that investment banks were
among some of the worst offenders, paying for ratings and therefore causing conflicts of interest.
The amount of revenue these three companies annually receive is approximately $5 billion.
Further investigations uncovered many disturbing problems. First, Moody’s, S&P’s,
and Fitch had all violated a code of conduct that required analysts to consider only credit
factors, not “‘the potential impact on Moody’s, or an issuer, an investor or other market
participant.”’ Also, these companies had become overwhelmed by an increase in the volume
and sophistication of the securities they were asked to review. Finally, analysts, faced with
less time to perform the due diligence expected of them, began to cut corners.
SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro believes that the SEC must take more drastic measures to
implement oversight for credit-rating firms—a group that was largely blamed for not catching
risky activity in the financial sector sooner. Part of the problem, as Schapiro sees it, is that
credit rating firms are paid by the securities that they rank. This creates a conflict of interest
problem, and can affect the reliability of the ratings.23 No organization is exempt from criticism
over how transparent it is. While large financial firms have received most of the fury over risk
taking and executive pay, even nonprofits are now being scrutinized more carefully.24
THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT
In 2002, largely in response to widespread corporate accounting scandals, Congress passed
the Sarbanes–Oxley Act to establish a system of federal oversight of corporate accounting
practices. In addition to making fraudulent financial reporting a criminal offense and
strengthening penalties for corporate fraud, the law requires corporations to establish
codes of ethics for financial reporting and to develop greater transparency in financial
reporting to investors and other stakeholders.
Supported by both Republicans and Democrats, the Sarbanes–Oxley Act was enacted to
restore stakeholder confidence after accounting fraud at Enron, WorldCom, ...
Pcob Section 101
The PCAOB implemented new rules to provide more transparency around public company audits. The new rules require disclosure of the engagement partner's name, the names and locations of other accounting firms involved in the audit that conducted at least 5% of the total audit hours, and the aggregate participation of other firms. Previously, only the lead audit firm was disclosed. The new rules aim to give financial statement users more complete information about who is responsible for the audit opinion.
Fraud outweighs cost compliance (scce)
Senator Joe Biden argues that the costs of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are far outweighed by the costs of corporate fraud and lack of transparency. He provides evidence that Sarbanes-Oxley has restored investor confidence by improving financial reporting accuracy and accountability. While some compliance costs exist, most companies that avoid regulation through private equity deals have serious financial issues, and all public companies should ensure accurate financial reporting. Maintaining high standards of transparency and accountability is crucial for the integrity of US capital markets.
Fraud outweighs cost compliance (scce)
Senator Joe Biden argues that the costs of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are far outweighed by the costs of corporate fraud and lack of transparency. He provides evidence that Sarbanes-Oxley has restored investor confidence by improving financial reporting accuracy and accountability. While some compliance costs exist, most companies that avoid regulation through private equity deals have serious financial issues, and all public companies should ensure accurate financial reporting. Maintaining high standards of transparency and accountability is crucial for the integrity of US capital markets.
Once upon a time in a land great
Once upon a time, the mighty Enron fell due to fraud. The people were sad until the king passed a law to regulate businesses and prevent fraud. However, this law became too restrictive, trying to regulate human greed and corruption which cannot be controlled. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed in 2002 in response to new corporate scandals, but it has resulted in unintended consequences by discouraging risk-taking and creating legal challenges for businesses due to its extensive regulations and penalties.
The Sarbanes Oxley Act ( Sox )
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was implemented in 2002 in response to major corporate accounting scandals. SOX aimed to improve corporate governance and transparency by regulating auditor independence and requiring internal control assessment. It has resulted in more thorough audits but also increased expenses for businesses. While SOX has strengthened financial reporting, there is debate around its costs and some provisions may disproportionately burden smaller companies.
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the E.pdf
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the Enron scandal in 2001.
Solution
Enron Scandal 2001
Enron a global Gas and Energy company incorporated in Omaha Nebraska and once
distinguished as the Nation’s 7th largest company. Listed on Forbs Fortune 500 as being among
the wealthiest companies listed on the stock exchange. Through this accumulation of “wealth”
Enron at one point held a robust market valuation, which was higher other large global
companies like AT&T. Many would call Enron a company that was “too big to fail”; this was
due to the company’s reported revenue milestone accomplishment of 100 billion dollars.
But what made the Enron scandal so compelling was the fact that it brought down accounting
giant Arthur Andersen too. It was a truly amazing situation, a conflation of corporate
wrongdoing which would change the accounting world forever.
Changes In Financial Reporting and Other Changes due to Enron Scandal 2001
SOX includes several gatekeeper provisions:
Requiring a company’s board of directors to have an Audit Committee composed solely of
independent directors.
Making the Audit Committee responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of
the outside auditor and for establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission
by company employees of concerns about accounting or auditing practices.
Creating a new agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), to
strengthen the outside audit function. The PCAOB sets standards involving auditing, quality
control, ethics, and audit reports and has authority to inspect, investigate, and discipline
registered public accounting firms.
Requiring attorneys who practice before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to
report material violations of the securities laws to a company’s chief legal officer or chief
executive officer. If those officers do not respond in an appropriate manner, the attorney is then
required to report the violations to the Audit Committee of the board or to another committee
composed solely of independent directors.
Enhance Regulatory Protections
Federal and state securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations play an important and
necessary role in corporate governance. They wield a broad and powerful array of sanctions, and
their enforcement actions serve as a strong deterrent against wrongdoing. The SEC’s
enforcement priorities, reflected in public speeches by its Commissioners and staff, help shape
corporate conduct.
Increase in Regulations after Sarbanes Oxley
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act initiated stringent regulations. The Act was composed of sixty-six
sections, some long and others short. Each section dealt with a different part of the reporting
cycle (Schaeffer, 2006). These sections are contained within eleven titles, primarily dealing with
the issue of internal control. The eleven titles of SOX are as follows: Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, auditor independence, corporate respo.
Similar to Flournoypresentation (12)
Chapter 4 The Institutionalization of Business Ethics 107.docx
Chapter 4 The Institutionalization of Business Ethics 107.docx
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the E.pdf
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the E.pdf
Recently uploaded
Unveiling the Dynamic Personalities, Key Dates, and Horoscope Insights: Gemin...
Explore the fascinating world of the Gemini Zodiac Sign. Discover the unique personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights of Gemini individuals. Learn how their sociable, communicative nature and boundless curiosity make them the dynamic explorers of the zodiac. Dive into the duality of the Gemini sign and understand their intellectual and adventurous spirit.
HOW TO START UP A COMPANY A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE.pdf
How to Start Up a Company: A Step-by-Step Guide Starting a company is an exciting adventure that combines creativity, strategy, and hard work. It can seem overwhelming at first, but with the right guidance, anyone can transform a great idea into a successful business. Let's dive into how to start up a company, from the initial spark of an idea to securing funding and launching your startup.
Introduction
Have you ever dreamed of turning your innovative idea into a thriving business? Starting a company involves numerous steps and decisions, but don't worry—we're here to help. Whether you're exploring how to start a startup company or wondering how to start up a small business, this guide will walk you through the process, step by step.
Brian Fitzsimmons on the Business Strategy and Content Flywheel of Barstool S...
On episode 272 of the Digital and Social Media Sports Podcast, Neil chatted with Brian Fitzsimmons, Director of Licensing and Business Development for Barstool Sports.
What follows is a collection of snippets from the podcast. To hear the full interview and more, check out the podcast on all podcast platforms and at www.dsmsports.net
Profiles of Iconic Fashion Personalities.pdf
The fashion industry is dynamic and ever-changing, continuously sculpted by trailblazing visionaries who challenge norms and redefine beauty. This document delves into the profiles of some of the most iconic fashion personalities whose impact has left a lasting impression on the industry. From timeless designers to modern-day influencers, each individual has uniquely woven their thread into the rich fabric of fashion history, contributing to its ongoing evolution.
Maksym Vyshnivetskyi: PMO KPIs (UA) (#12)
Maksym Vyshnivetskyi: PMO KPIs (UA)
Lemberg PMO School 2024
Website – https://lembs.com/pmoschool
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/startuplviv
FB – https://www.facebook.com/pmdayconference
一比一原版新西兰奥塔哥大学毕业证（otago毕业证）如何办理
一模一样【微信：A575476】【新西兰奥塔哥大学毕业证（otago毕业证）成绩单Offer】【微信：A575476】（留信学历认证永久存档查询）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信：A575476】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信：A575476】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：可来公司面谈，可签订合同，会陪同客户一起到教育部认证窗口递交认证材料，客户在教育部官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Kalyan Chart Indian Matka Kalyan panel Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Kalyan Chart Indian Matka Kalyan panel Chart➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men Rings
Discover timeless style with the 2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men's Ring. Crafted from premium stainless steel, this 6mm wide ring embodies elegance and durability. Perfect as a gift, it seamlessly blends classic Roman numeral detailing with modern sophistication, making it an ideal accessory for any occasion.
https://rb.gy/usj1a2
How MJ Global Leads the Packaging Industry.pdf
MJ Global's success in staying ahead of the curve in the packaging industry is a testament to its dedication to innovation, sustainability, and customer-centricity. By embracing technological advancements, leading in eco-friendly solutions, collaborating with industry leaders, and adapting to evolving consumer preferences, MJ Global continues to set new standards in the packaging sector.
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
9356872877Sattamatka.satta.matka.satta matka.kalyan weekly chart.kalyan chart.kalyan jodi chart.kalyan penal chart.kalyan today.kalyan open.fix satta.fix fix fix Satta matka nambar.Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka Dpbos...
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka Dpbos...➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Sattamatka.satta.matka.satta matka.kalyan weekly chart.kalyan chart.kalyan jodi chart.kalyan penal chart.kalyan today.kalyan open.fix satta.fix fix fix Satta matka nambarThe latest Heat Pump Manual from Newentide
𝐔𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐢𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐄𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐄𝐖𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐃𝐄’𝐬 𝐋𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬
Explore the details in our newly released product manual, which showcases NEWNTIDE's advanced heat pump technologies. Delve into our energy-efficient and eco-friendly solutions tailored for diverse global markets.
Income Tax exemption for Start up : Section 80 IAC
A presentation on the concept of Exemption of Profits of Start ups from Income Tax
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
Nathalie zal delen hoe DEI en ESG een fundamentele rol kunnen spelen in je merkstrategie en je de juiste aansluiting kan creëren met je doelgroep. Door middel van voorbeelden en simpele handvatten toont ze hoe dit in jouw organisatie toegepast kan worden.
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka Indian satta Matka Dpboss Matka Kalyan Chart Matka Boss otg matka Guessing Satta Taurus Zodiac Sign: Unveiling the Traits, Dates, and Horoscope Insights of th...
Dive into the steadfast world of the Taurus Zodiac Sign. Discover the grounded, stable, and logical nature of Taurus individuals, and explore their key personality traits, important dates, and horoscope insights. Learn how the determination and patience of the Taurus sign make them the rock-steady achievers and anchors of the zodiac.
Digital Transformation Frameworks: Driving Digital Excellence
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This presentation is a curated compilation of PowerPoint diagrams and templates designed to illustrate 20 different digital transformation frameworks and models. These frameworks are based on recent industry trends and best practices, ensuring that the content remains relevant and up-to-date.
Key highlights include Microsoft's Digital Transformation Framework, which focuses on driving innovation and efficiency, and McKinsey's Ten Guiding Principles, which provide strategic insights for successful digital transformation. Additionally, Forrester's framework emphasizes enhancing customer experiences and modernizing IT infrastructure, while IDC's MaturityScape helps assess and develop organizational digital maturity. MIT's framework explores cutting-edge strategies for achieving digital success.
These materials are perfect for enhancing your business or classroom presentations, offering visual aids to supplement your insights. Please note that while comprehensive, these slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be complete for standalone instructional purposes.
Frameworks/Models included:
Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
McKinsey’s Ten Guiding Principles of Digital Transformation
Forrester’s Digital Transformation Framework
IDC’s Digital Transformation MaturityScape
MIT’s Digital Transformation Framework
Gartner’s Digital Transformation Framework
Accenture’s Digital Strategy & Enterprise Frameworks
Deloitte’s Digital Industrial Transformation Framework
Capgemini’s Digital Transformation Framework
PwC’s Digital Transformation Framework
Cisco’s Digital Transformation Framework
Cognizant’s Digital Transformation Framework
DXC Technology’s Digital Transformation Framework
The BCG Strategy Palette
McKinsey’s Digital Transformation Framework
Digital Transformation Compass
Four Levels of Digital Maturity
Design Thinking Framework
Business Model Canvas
Customer Journey Map
Recently uploaded (20)
Unveiling the Dynamic Personalities, Key Dates, and Horoscope Insights: Gemin...
Unveiling the Dynamic Personalities, Key Dates, and Horoscope Insights: Gemin...
HOW TO START UP A COMPANY A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE.pdf
HOW TO START UP A COMPANY A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE.pdf
Brian Fitzsimmons on the Business Strategy and Content Flywheel of Barstool S...
Brian Fitzsimmons on the Business Strategy and Content Flywheel of Barstool S...
Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Kalyan Chart Indian Matka Kalyan panel Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Kalyan Chart Indian Matka Kalyan panel Chart
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka Dpbos...
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka Dpbos...
Income Tax exemption for Start up : Section 80 IAC
Income Tax exemption for Start up : Section 80 IAC
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
Taurus Zodiac Sign: Unveiling the Traits, Dates, and Horoscope Insights of th...
Taurus Zodiac Sign: Unveiling the Traits, Dates, and Horoscope Insights of th...
Digital Transformation Frameworks: Driving Digital Excellence
Digital Transformation Frameworks: Driving Digital Excellence
Flournoypresentation
- 1. What is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and why should business majors know it importance? By: Khaalis J. Flournoy Date: June 6, 2010 Instructor: Mrs. Owens
- 2. Summary This power point is to inform on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It gives insight on how it came about. Companies that it has affected. The Pros and Cons by debate. Includes why it is important to know about the SOX as known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
- 3. What is the SOX’s? Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was signed July 2002 by president George W. Bush. It was made to regain the confidence in the shareholders that were affected by the companies that were committing fraud. It made companies have new regulations and rules.
- 4. Founders of the SOX Michael Oxley Paul Sarbanes
- 5. WorldCom, Enron, and Tyco Later 2001 and early 2002 WorldCom, Enron and Tyco were the companies that released false information to the general public and their shareholders. The more revenue the company had the more shareholders they would receive, so the companies would overstate their financial statements.
- 6. Continued WorldCom was the first to fall and then the shareholders begun to wonder why. The company had just recent reported that they were growing but they only reported growth to get more shares in their company. The shareholders fought for the pensions and savings.
- 7. Continued WorldCom among many other companies were bought to justices. Although being in court WorldCom still tried to cover their trail. WorldCom paid their external auditors and accounting firms to destroy important files and the actual financial statements.
- 8. Continued Employees of WorldCom admitted that the Financial specialist and CEO’s told them to overstated the financial statements for more future profits. WorldCom could not win because of the Sarbanes-Oxley and how external auditors and accountants were finding all their reports and financial statement.
- 9. New rules and Regulations The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made it mandatory to keep certain record pertaining to audits such as: Voicemails, emails, recorded personal phone calls, work with errors, letters, memos, notes, income statements, statement of owner equity, balance sheets, revenue, Journal entries, and net income.
- 10. Continued All of the new files under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 must be kept for at least five years or more.
- 11. How the Sox has protected the General public? The general public has argued that the SOX’s has been a good help to know which company is the best company to invest with and if the company that you are investing with is reporting false information.
- 12. How the SOX has affected the small business owners? Some small and large companies has argued that following the SOX’s rules and regulations is very expensive it has become a burden for the small business owner. Most small business owners has reported that is to expensive to pay an internal auditor/accountant and an external auditor and accountant.
- 13. Who is penalized for false information? The larger companies compared to the WorldCom and Enron have complained that is not fair that everything that is reported from their company will be the responsibility of the CEO. If the company reports false information the CEO will be blame for the false information and the external auditors/accountants.
- 14. Basic Behaviors and Sentences The destruction or cover up of any records with the intent of obstructing a federal investigation. Fine and/or up to 10 years imprisonment. Failure to maintain audit or review “workpapers” for at least five years. Fine and/or up to 5 years imprisonment.
- 15. Who has to follow these rules? According to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 the all the rules and regulation apply to any company that provides a service to the public and especially to companies that have shareholders and that is connected with stock trades nationally and internationally.
- 16. Conclusion The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was made for the public. I was also made to regulate the companies that have shareholders and trading grounds. Some have argued that it is not fair and it is hurting the American financial world.
- 17. Work Cited www.washingtonpost.com Carl S. Warren, James M. Reeve, and Jonathan E. Duchac. Accounting and Finance 22E. Mason: Rob Dewey, 2007, 2005. Graphics: www.nysscpa.org How Sarbanes-Oxley has affected the Education of Accounting and Business related majors? www.crroconference.org www.financialforum.umb.edu The fall of WorldCom, Tyco, and Enron after the Sarbanes-Oxley. Feldman. Dorothy A. and William J. Read “Auditor Conservatism after Enron” Auditing 29.1 (2010):267-278 Business Source Complete, EBSCO, Web. 28 May 2010