The National Solar Jobs Census 2010 found that as of August 2010:
- The U.S. solar industry employs approximately 93,000 solar workers nationwide.
- Over the next 12 months, solar companies expect to add nearly 24,000 new jobs, a growth rate of 26%.
- Half of solar firms anticipate increasing their workforce over the coming year, while only 2% expect reductions.
The National Solar Jobs Census 2013 found that the U.S. solar industry employed 142,698 workers as of November 2013, an increase of nearly 20% from 2012. Solar jobs are growing ten times faster than the overall economy. The solar industry expects to add over 22,000 new jobs in the next year, a 15.6% growth rate. Installers, which make up over two-thirds of new solar hires, added 12,500 workers in the past year and are expected to increase by nearly 15,000 next year.
The National Solar Jobs Census 2013 found that:
- Solar industry employment grew by nearly 20% since 2012 to 142,698 workers in 2013, a rate 10 times faster than overall US job growth.
- Three-quarters of the 24,000 new solar workers since 2012 were new jobs, representing 18,211 new jobs created.
- The solar industry expects to add approximately 22,240 new solar workers over the next year, a projected growth rate of 15.6%.
- Installation jobs, which grew by 12,500 workers since 2012, are expected to increase by nearly 15,000 next year.
The solar industry in Arizona saw a significant decline in jobs between 2012 and 2013, dropping from 9,800 solar workers to 8,558, a reduction of over 1,200 jobs or 12.7%. This decline was largely due to the completion of large solar projects, policy uncertainty in the state, and struggles in the international solar industry. However, the outlook is somewhat more positive, with over one-third of Arizona solar companies expecting to add jobs by late 2014. The industry projects adding around 475 jobs, a growth rate of 5.6%, over the next year. Currently, the vast majority (around 68%) of Arizona solar workers are employed in the installation sector.
The GW Solar Institute, a research partner on the National Solar Jobs Census 2014, joined The Solar Foundation and BW Research Partnership in announcing that the solar energy industry added over 31,000 new jobs in 2014. This remarkable growth rate is almost twenty times the national average and accounts for 1 out every 78 new jobs created in the US since Solar Jobs Census 2013.
The U.S. solar industry employs an estimated 100,237 solar workers as of August 2011, up 6.8% from August 2010. Nearly half of solar firms expect to add jobs over the next 12 months, anticipating growth of around 24,000 new jobs and a 24% increase. Solar job growth significantly outpaces overall national employment growth. Installation, manufacturing, sales and distribution, and utility firms all anticipate substantial employment gains in the coming year.
A biased "report" issued from a group of anti-drillers flying under the banner of the Multi-State Shale Research Collaboration. The report supposedly proves the Marcellus and Utica Shale haven't created all that many jobs after all. In other words, this is a big, bold lie to try to convince people the enormous benefits from shale drilling in the northeast--which has single-handedly saved the northeast from the worst of the Obama depression--didn't really happen! Pay no attention to all those new jobs--shale didn't really create them! Right.
U.S. employers added 113,000 jobs in January 2014, below expectations. The unemployment rate fell to 6.6% while average hourly earnings rose 1.9% year-over-year. Although the unemployment picture improved, recent months have seen lackluster job creation renewing concerns about the strength of the labor market and economy going forward. Over 10 million Americans remain unemployed, with many long-term unemployed facing challenges finding new opportunities.
This document analyzes the impact of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) jobs on the US workforce and economy. It finds that:
1) STEM jobs directly account for 33% of US employment and 39% of US GDP.
2) When including indirect and induced impacts, STEM supports 67% of all US jobs, 69% of US GDP, and $2.3 trillion in annual federal tax revenue.
3) Contrary to perceptions, 59% of the US STEM workforce does not hold a bachelor's degree, having various types of post-secondary training and education. STEM jobs exist across many industries and educational backgrounds.
The National Solar Jobs Census 2013 found that the U.S. solar industry employed 142,698 workers as of November 2013, an increase of nearly 20% from 2012. Solar jobs are growing ten times faster than the overall economy. The solar industry expects to add over 22,000 new jobs in the next year, a 15.6% growth rate. Installers, which make up over two-thirds of new solar hires, added 12,500 workers in the past year and are expected to increase by nearly 15,000 next year.
The National Solar Jobs Census 2013 found that:
- Solar industry employment grew by nearly 20% since 2012 to 142,698 workers in 2013, a rate 10 times faster than overall US job growth.
- Three-quarters of the 24,000 new solar workers since 2012 were new jobs, representing 18,211 new jobs created.
- The solar industry expects to add approximately 22,240 new solar workers over the next year, a projected growth rate of 15.6%.
- Installation jobs, which grew by 12,500 workers since 2012, are expected to increase by nearly 15,000 next year.
The solar industry in Arizona saw a significant decline in jobs between 2012 and 2013, dropping from 9,800 solar workers to 8,558, a reduction of over 1,200 jobs or 12.7%. This decline was largely due to the completion of large solar projects, policy uncertainty in the state, and struggles in the international solar industry. However, the outlook is somewhat more positive, with over one-third of Arizona solar companies expecting to add jobs by late 2014. The industry projects adding around 475 jobs, a growth rate of 5.6%, over the next year. Currently, the vast majority (around 68%) of Arizona solar workers are employed in the installation sector.
The GW Solar Institute, a research partner on the National Solar Jobs Census 2014, joined The Solar Foundation and BW Research Partnership in announcing that the solar energy industry added over 31,000 new jobs in 2014. This remarkable growth rate is almost twenty times the national average and accounts for 1 out every 78 new jobs created in the US since Solar Jobs Census 2013.
The U.S. solar industry employs an estimated 100,237 solar workers as of August 2011, up 6.8% from August 2010. Nearly half of solar firms expect to add jobs over the next 12 months, anticipating growth of around 24,000 new jobs and a 24% increase. Solar job growth significantly outpaces overall national employment growth. Installation, manufacturing, sales and distribution, and utility firms all anticipate substantial employment gains in the coming year.
A biased "report" issued from a group of anti-drillers flying under the banner of the Multi-State Shale Research Collaboration. The report supposedly proves the Marcellus and Utica Shale haven't created all that many jobs after all. In other words, this is a big, bold lie to try to convince people the enormous benefits from shale drilling in the northeast--which has single-handedly saved the northeast from the worst of the Obama depression--didn't really happen! Pay no attention to all those new jobs--shale didn't really create them! Right.
U.S. employers added 113,000 jobs in January 2014, below expectations. The unemployment rate fell to 6.6% while average hourly earnings rose 1.9% year-over-year. Although the unemployment picture improved, recent months have seen lackluster job creation renewing concerns about the strength of the labor market and economy going forward. Over 10 million Americans remain unemployed, with many long-term unemployed facing challenges finding new opportunities.
This document analyzes the impact of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) jobs on the US workforce and economy. It finds that:
1) STEM jobs directly account for 33% of US employment and 39% of US GDP.
2) When including indirect and induced impacts, STEM supports 67% of all US jobs, 69% of US GDP, and $2.3 trillion in annual federal tax revenue.
3) Contrary to perceptions, 59% of the US STEM workforce does not hold a bachelor's degree, having various types of post-secondary training and education. STEM jobs exist across many industries and educational backgrounds.
1) The document summarizes US employment figures for March 2014, which showed solid job growth of 192,000 new jobs added and the unemployment rate remaining unchanged at 6.7%.
2) Gains were broad-based across multiple sectors such as professional services, retail, food services, and construction. Private sector employment surpassed pre-recession levels.
3) The steady job growth in March suggests the US labor market was less negatively impacted by winter weather than expected and continues moving slowly in the right direction of recovery.
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookJLL
September’s jobs figures were below expectations, with only 142,000 jobs added and August downwardly revised to 136,000. Although some of this may be attributed to seasonality, strong external fundamentals signal that slower figures may be the result of an impending talent crunch.
Oregon successfully attracted two solar manufacturers, SolarWorld and Solaicx, by highlighting available infrastructure like a mothballed semiconductor plant, a skilled workforce from its history in the semiconductor industry, and state incentives like tax credits. Other states like Massachusetts, Washington, and others are also actively recruiting solar manufacturers by offering tax incentives and policies to grow local solar markets and support in-state solar component manufacturing. Solar companies consider factors like available workforce, infrastructure for transportation and supplies, and market access when choosing production locations.
Michael Goodman: The State of the State EconomyMassTLC
This document provides an overview of the current state of the Massachusetts economy and identifies several long-term challenges. It notes that while the state's economic expansion compares favorably to the national growth, conditions remain difficult for some groups. It also discusses how technology and globalization are changing business models and the relationship between investment, employment, and market value. The document concludes by outlining challenges such as the achievement gap, infrastructure issues, housing costs, energy prices, and climate change that could impede long-term economic growth in Massachusetts if not addressed.
U.S. employers added only 74,000 jobs in December, the weakest monthly gain since 2011. While the unemployment rate fell to 6.7%, nearly 350,000 workers left the labor force, accounting for most of the decline. Overall job growth in 2013 averaged 182,000 per month, similar to 2012 but below expectations of stronger growth. The disappointing December figures may suggest the economy and labor market remain fragile.
This document discusses the growing economic insecurity faced by many Americans due to factors such as long-term unemployment, declining incomes, and rising healthcare costs. It notes that over 20% of Americans experience a major loss of income each year, higher than in previous recessions, and that nearly half would struggle financially within two months of a loss of income. This economic uncertainty has implications for businesses, lowering productivity and increasing health issues among employees. It poses challenges for human resources departments in terms of employee engagement, training, and career development programs in an environment where job security and traditional incentives are diminished.
Discussion at a UFT teachers' retreat by Jack Powers, chairman of New York City's Advisory Council for Career & Technical Education. on labor market projections and the crisis in college completion.
The document summarizes a jobs report for July 2013. It states that while the unemployment rate dropped to 7.4%, job growth also slowed, with employers adding only 162,000 new jobs. This continuing slow growth suggests the labor market is still struggling despite improvements in other areas. Consumer and high-skilled sectors did see some job gains. Overall the report indicates the pace of the economic and labor market recovery remains sluggish.
The document discusses a new OSHA initiative to increase protections for temporary workers. It was prompted by several temporary worker deaths in the past year. The initiative requires staffing firms and client companies to ensure temporary workers have a safe workplace and necessary safety training. Both entities may now be held liable for violations. Research shows temporary workers have higher injury risks due to lack of safety training and some employers view them as expendable. The initiative aims to address this issue and protect temporary worker safety.
My presentation to the NC Technology Association\'s annual leadership conference on how North Carolina compares to other states on innovation and technology.
Productivity growth may have peaked, leading employers to find they need more staff to maintain operations. With corporate profits at record highs, companies can afford to hire more workers even with modest GDP growth of around 2%. If hiring increases as expected, it could boost the economy in the short-term by adding more buying power during the holiday season. While the relationship between employment growth and GDP growth is complex, increased employment likely helped lift the UK out of recession recently and may provide upside potential for both the US economy and labor market in 2013.
Minneapolis–St. Employment Update | December 2015Carolyn Bates
The local unemployment rate of 2.9% has hit its lowest point since 2001. Coupled with year-over-year labor force growth of 34.2 thousand jobs, Minneapolis-St. Paul currently has one of the strongest economies of any major metro in the United States.
As is typically the case, MSP’s office-using sectors dominated hiring by taking 48.0 percent of the 12-month total employment growth, while the industrial sectors experienced a loss of 1.8 percent.
At the national level, monthly growth of 211,000 jobs over the course of November represented the second consecutive month of rebound after a slowdown in mid-2015. At the current rate of growth, a mid-to-late-2016 timeframe seems likely for the first stage of tightening.
The document discusses three ways to improve the declining state of manufacturing in the United States: 1) Restructuring corporate tax policies to incentivize manufacturers to stay in the U.S. by eliminating tax deferrals and implementing an alternative minimum tax, 2) Increasing funding for programs that support small and medium manufacturers through initiatives like the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, and 3) Expanding worker training programs through apprenticeships and tax credits for employer training to develop skilled workers for manufacturing jobs. The decline of American manufacturing will continue without changes to policies that have encouraged offshoring of production.
Labour market resilience Blue Mirror Insights august 2021Michael Cross
Looks at labour market resilience in the USA both nationally and at county level (uses Orange County, Los Angeles, California) to illustrate the labour market and occupational view of resilience
Amid concerns that the US economy might crash for various reasons, industries in Utah, specifically the construction businesses, have remained thriving overall. In fact, due to the national economy operating at a stable and positive pace, the local economy is also doing pretty well.
API Report: Oil and Natural Gas Stimulate American Economic and Job GrowthMarcellus Drilling News
A report from the American Petroleum Institute that shows the incredible number of jobs and resulting economic growth that comes from shale drilling in the U.S. The study keys in on the role of "supply chain" companies--companies that sell good and services to the drilling industry.
Why did Intel choose to continue expansion plans in Chandler, AZ? StateBook's proprietary data mapping, comparison, and reporting tool offers a quick look at the city of Chandler and the Phoenix metropolitan area
Minneapolis–St. Paul Employment Update | August 2016Carolyn Bates
According to the most recent BLS estimates, Minneapolis-St. Paul’s unemployment has ticked up from last month’s 3.1%, yet still sits comfortably below the 4 percent mark. Having the second-lowest unemployment rate in the nation among all large metros offers its own challenges as employers prepare for a potentially looming talent shortage.
Once again, MSP achieved record-breaking employment totals for professional and business services, a fundamental component to the metro’s economic growth. Approximately 6,000 jobs have been added in the industry year-over-year.
The U.S. economy saw the addition of 255,000 net new jobs in July, the second consecutive month of healthy additions after a volatile first quarter and next to no growth in May.
Nationally, average weekly wages continue to rise at an annual clip of 2.6 percent, more than double inflation at 1.0 percent. This will boost disposable income and, in turn, personal consumption that drives GDP.
U.S. employers added 148,000 workers in September, while the unemployment rate fell to 7.2%. Average hourly earnings rose 2.1% over the previous year. The job growth was lower than expected and the report signals mixed economic data, as unemployment declined slowly but employer confidence in hiring remains lacking.
DCR TrendLine July 2014 - Non Employee Workforce Insightss
DCR TrendLine shares analyses of trends and happenings in the staffing industry. The July edition covers a range of topics, including the latest employment figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the growing utilization of temporary workers across multiple industries. This month’s edition focuses on the Information Technology (IT) industry, highlight trends in the sector and sharing insight into employment and wages. We examine the skill gap in the industry and discuss how companies are attempting to bridge it. We also highlight how predictive analytics are being applied in human resource management and which talent acquisition metrics companies should be tracking. Our feature article this month is particularly applicable to companies with contingent workforce programs. We look at the challenges companies often face, and offer tips on keeping CW programs running smoothly.
The solar industry in Arizona saw significant job losses in 2013, declining by over 1,200 workers and 12.7% from the previous year. This is attributed to the completion of large solar projects that drove hiring in prior years. While total solar capacity installed was similar year-over-year, the residential market segment grew more slowly at 13% compared to nearly 94% the prior year. Over a third of Arizona solar employers expect to add jobs in the coming year, but overall employment is projected to grow by only 475 jobs or 5.6% with continued policy uncertainty in the state. The solar workforce in Arizona currently stands at 8,558 workers, down from 9,800 in 2012, with the vast majority employed in installation
Official Document of the Karnataka solar policy 2014-2021 released by the Government of Karnataka.
This document is not a work of Headway Solar (http://headwaysolar.com/) and it has been released here for the benefit of the general public.
1) The document summarizes US employment figures for March 2014, which showed solid job growth of 192,000 new jobs added and the unemployment rate remaining unchanged at 6.7%.
2) Gains were broad-based across multiple sectors such as professional services, retail, food services, and construction. Private sector employment surpassed pre-recession levels.
3) The steady job growth in March suggests the US labor market was less negatively impacted by winter weather than expected and continues moving slowly in the right direction of recovery.
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookJLL
September’s jobs figures were below expectations, with only 142,000 jobs added and August downwardly revised to 136,000. Although some of this may be attributed to seasonality, strong external fundamentals signal that slower figures may be the result of an impending talent crunch.
Oregon successfully attracted two solar manufacturers, SolarWorld and Solaicx, by highlighting available infrastructure like a mothballed semiconductor plant, a skilled workforce from its history in the semiconductor industry, and state incentives like tax credits. Other states like Massachusetts, Washington, and others are also actively recruiting solar manufacturers by offering tax incentives and policies to grow local solar markets and support in-state solar component manufacturing. Solar companies consider factors like available workforce, infrastructure for transportation and supplies, and market access when choosing production locations.
Michael Goodman: The State of the State EconomyMassTLC
This document provides an overview of the current state of the Massachusetts economy and identifies several long-term challenges. It notes that while the state's economic expansion compares favorably to the national growth, conditions remain difficult for some groups. It also discusses how technology and globalization are changing business models and the relationship between investment, employment, and market value. The document concludes by outlining challenges such as the achievement gap, infrastructure issues, housing costs, energy prices, and climate change that could impede long-term economic growth in Massachusetts if not addressed.
U.S. employers added only 74,000 jobs in December, the weakest monthly gain since 2011. While the unemployment rate fell to 6.7%, nearly 350,000 workers left the labor force, accounting for most of the decline. Overall job growth in 2013 averaged 182,000 per month, similar to 2012 but below expectations of stronger growth. The disappointing December figures may suggest the economy and labor market remain fragile.
This document discusses the growing economic insecurity faced by many Americans due to factors such as long-term unemployment, declining incomes, and rising healthcare costs. It notes that over 20% of Americans experience a major loss of income each year, higher than in previous recessions, and that nearly half would struggle financially within two months of a loss of income. This economic uncertainty has implications for businesses, lowering productivity and increasing health issues among employees. It poses challenges for human resources departments in terms of employee engagement, training, and career development programs in an environment where job security and traditional incentives are diminished.
Discussion at a UFT teachers' retreat by Jack Powers, chairman of New York City's Advisory Council for Career & Technical Education. on labor market projections and the crisis in college completion.
The document summarizes a jobs report for July 2013. It states that while the unemployment rate dropped to 7.4%, job growth also slowed, with employers adding only 162,000 new jobs. This continuing slow growth suggests the labor market is still struggling despite improvements in other areas. Consumer and high-skilled sectors did see some job gains. Overall the report indicates the pace of the economic and labor market recovery remains sluggish.
The document discusses a new OSHA initiative to increase protections for temporary workers. It was prompted by several temporary worker deaths in the past year. The initiative requires staffing firms and client companies to ensure temporary workers have a safe workplace and necessary safety training. Both entities may now be held liable for violations. Research shows temporary workers have higher injury risks due to lack of safety training and some employers view them as expendable. The initiative aims to address this issue and protect temporary worker safety.
My presentation to the NC Technology Association\'s annual leadership conference on how North Carolina compares to other states on innovation and technology.
Productivity growth may have peaked, leading employers to find they need more staff to maintain operations. With corporate profits at record highs, companies can afford to hire more workers even with modest GDP growth of around 2%. If hiring increases as expected, it could boost the economy in the short-term by adding more buying power during the holiday season. While the relationship between employment growth and GDP growth is complex, increased employment likely helped lift the UK out of recession recently and may provide upside potential for both the US economy and labor market in 2013.
Minneapolis–St. Employment Update | December 2015Carolyn Bates
The local unemployment rate of 2.9% has hit its lowest point since 2001. Coupled with year-over-year labor force growth of 34.2 thousand jobs, Minneapolis-St. Paul currently has one of the strongest economies of any major metro in the United States.
As is typically the case, MSP’s office-using sectors dominated hiring by taking 48.0 percent of the 12-month total employment growth, while the industrial sectors experienced a loss of 1.8 percent.
At the national level, monthly growth of 211,000 jobs over the course of November represented the second consecutive month of rebound after a slowdown in mid-2015. At the current rate of growth, a mid-to-late-2016 timeframe seems likely for the first stage of tightening.
The document discusses three ways to improve the declining state of manufacturing in the United States: 1) Restructuring corporate tax policies to incentivize manufacturers to stay in the U.S. by eliminating tax deferrals and implementing an alternative minimum tax, 2) Increasing funding for programs that support small and medium manufacturers through initiatives like the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, and 3) Expanding worker training programs through apprenticeships and tax credits for employer training to develop skilled workers for manufacturing jobs. The decline of American manufacturing will continue without changes to policies that have encouraged offshoring of production.
Labour market resilience Blue Mirror Insights august 2021Michael Cross
Looks at labour market resilience in the USA both nationally and at county level (uses Orange County, Los Angeles, California) to illustrate the labour market and occupational view of resilience
Amid concerns that the US economy might crash for various reasons, industries in Utah, specifically the construction businesses, have remained thriving overall. In fact, due to the national economy operating at a stable and positive pace, the local economy is also doing pretty well.
API Report: Oil and Natural Gas Stimulate American Economic and Job GrowthMarcellus Drilling News
A report from the American Petroleum Institute that shows the incredible number of jobs and resulting economic growth that comes from shale drilling in the U.S. The study keys in on the role of "supply chain" companies--companies that sell good and services to the drilling industry.
Why did Intel choose to continue expansion plans in Chandler, AZ? StateBook's proprietary data mapping, comparison, and reporting tool offers a quick look at the city of Chandler and the Phoenix metropolitan area
Minneapolis–St. Paul Employment Update | August 2016Carolyn Bates
According to the most recent BLS estimates, Minneapolis-St. Paul’s unemployment has ticked up from last month’s 3.1%, yet still sits comfortably below the 4 percent mark. Having the second-lowest unemployment rate in the nation among all large metros offers its own challenges as employers prepare for a potentially looming talent shortage.
Once again, MSP achieved record-breaking employment totals for professional and business services, a fundamental component to the metro’s economic growth. Approximately 6,000 jobs have been added in the industry year-over-year.
The U.S. economy saw the addition of 255,000 net new jobs in July, the second consecutive month of healthy additions after a volatile first quarter and next to no growth in May.
Nationally, average weekly wages continue to rise at an annual clip of 2.6 percent, more than double inflation at 1.0 percent. This will boost disposable income and, in turn, personal consumption that drives GDP.
U.S. employers added 148,000 workers in September, while the unemployment rate fell to 7.2%. Average hourly earnings rose 2.1% over the previous year. The job growth was lower than expected and the report signals mixed economic data, as unemployment declined slowly but employer confidence in hiring remains lacking.
DCR TrendLine July 2014 - Non Employee Workforce Insightss
DCR TrendLine shares analyses of trends and happenings in the staffing industry. The July edition covers a range of topics, including the latest employment figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the growing utilization of temporary workers across multiple industries. This month’s edition focuses on the Information Technology (IT) industry, highlight trends in the sector and sharing insight into employment and wages. We examine the skill gap in the industry and discuss how companies are attempting to bridge it. We also highlight how predictive analytics are being applied in human resource management and which talent acquisition metrics companies should be tracking. Our feature article this month is particularly applicable to companies with contingent workforce programs. We look at the challenges companies often face, and offer tips on keeping CW programs running smoothly.
The solar industry in Arizona saw significant job losses in 2013, declining by over 1,200 workers and 12.7% from the previous year. This is attributed to the completion of large solar projects that drove hiring in prior years. While total solar capacity installed was similar year-over-year, the residential market segment grew more slowly at 13% compared to nearly 94% the prior year. Over a third of Arizona solar employers expect to add jobs in the coming year, but overall employment is projected to grow by only 475 jobs or 5.6% with continued policy uncertainty in the state. The solar workforce in Arizona currently stands at 8,558 workers, down from 9,800 in 2012, with the vast majority employed in installation
Official Document of the Karnataka solar policy 2014-2021 released by the Government of Karnataka.
This document is not a work of Headway Solar (http://headwaysolar.com/) and it has been released here for the benefit of the general public.
Tender Document for 3 MW solar plant at DiuHeadway Solar
Tender Document for 3 MW solar plant at Diu. Issued by Electricity Department of Daman and Diu.
This document is not a work of Headway Solar (http://headwaysolar.com/) and it has been released here for the benefit of the general public.
The document proposes hiring a Procurement Officer for Daleel Petroleum's field operations to ensure a steady supply of spare parts and materials. Key responsibilities would include purchasing locally from Ibri and other cities, developing supplier relationships, assisting with contracts and inventory management. Having local procurement expertise is expected to reduce costs and downtime while supporting the community.
This document summarizes key facts about solar energy in the United States and Florida: [1] The U.S. consumes disproportionately more energy than other nations; [2] Solar power can be implemented across the continental U.S.; [3] Solar industries have grown rapidly in recent years but face political threats; [4] Florida ranks among top states for installed solar capacity and jobs but still has opportunities for growth compared to other leading states.
The document provides an analysis of solar employment in California in 2013. It finds that California had 47,223 solar workers employed across the state, with most concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area and Southern California. California solar employers expect to add 10,500 new jobs, a growth rate of 22.3% by November 2014. The success of California's solar industry is driven by its leadership in solar energy installation, with over 40% of the nation's total solar capacity. Strong state policies like renewable portfolio standards and solar rebate programs have supported the growth of the solar industry and job creation in California.
The GW Solar Institute working paper, Bridging the Solar Income Gap, details a wide range of policy tools to increase access to affordable solar energy, particularly for lower income families. These urgently needed tools could help unlock solar energy for all Americans and drive billions of dollars of solar wealth into lower income communities.
Quantifying WOM Diffusion – Who gains, Who loses, from Viral-VideosBSI
Brand knowledge and associations can facilitate positive or negative spill-over effects from viral videos for featured brands. A recent viral video gained over 450 million total views from word-of-mouth after an initial 15 million hits in the first 5 days, despite a small $25,000 budget. While it provided branding exposure for many featured brands, the situational context reduced the effect for Burger King and instead boosted attention for McDonald's due to consumer misperceptions.
The National Solar Jobs Census 2012 report found that as of September 2012, the U.S. solar industry employed 119,016 workers, a 13.2% increase from the previous year. Solar employment is projected to grow an additional 17.2% over the next 12 months. Installation firms have added the most jobs over the past year and expect to add nearly 12,000 new jobs in the coming year. Nearly half of solar firms expect to add jobs in the next year, while less than 4% expect cuts. The solar industry continues to outpace overall U.S. employment growth and remains optimistic about future expansion despite economic and policy uncertainties.
Official Document of the Solar Power Policy of Andhra Pradesh 2015.
This document is not a work of Headway Solar (http://headwaysolar.com/) and it has been released here for the benefit of the general public.
The U.S. solar industry continued growing in 2012 despite economic challenges, creating over 13,000 new jobs - 86% of which were new positions. The solar industry's growth rate of 13.2% significantly outpaced the overall economy's rate of 2.3%. Installation jobs grew the most, offsetting declines in manufacturing. The solar industry remains optimistic about continued growth, expecting to add over 45,000 new jobs in the next year.
If you are looking for different dance classes to look fit and fine, Crunch Fitness studio has a variety of dance forms to keep you healthy. This infography reveals the different dance types of rhythms taught in the Crunch Fitness. So choose your favorite form and get ready to turn fit.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (“RFP”) FOR CRM MODERNIZATION SOFTWARE AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES.
The City of Chicago ("City"), acting through its Department of Innovation and Technology ("DoIT"), is pleased to invite the submission of proposals for the modernization of the City's Constituent Relationship Management ("CRM") system and processes to not only replace the City's current technology, but to provide a holistic, transformative solution to help the City of Chicago provide world-class resident relationship management services. The City sees the new CRM solution as the platform for this vision. However, this is strictly a tool. The Selected Respondent must deliver a comprehensive solution that empowers the City to provide convenient, user-friendly access for residents to connect, communicate, and collaborate with the City and with each other.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Official Document of the Tamilnadu Solar Energy Policy 2012.
This document is not a work of Headway Solar (http://headwaysolar.com/) and it has been released here for the benefit of the general public.
The solar industry currently employs over 142,000 workers in the United States, a nearly 20% growth over the previous year. California leads the country with over 47,000 solar jobs, though jobs are growing rapidly in many other states as well. While California, Arizona, New Jersey, and Massachusetts make up around half of total solar employment, jobs exist in all 50 states and 18 states more than doubled their solar jobs in 2013.
Official Document of the Solar Policy of Uttar Pradesh 2013.
This document is not a work of Headway Solar (http://headwaysolar.com/) and it has been released here for the benefit of the general public.
Bill Bass shows off his home that is powered by clean, solar electricity.
This presentation was given December 4, 2009 at the Solar Energy Focus Conference: Fall 2009 hosted by the Maryland, DC, Virginia Solar Energy Industries Association (MDV-SEIA) in Gaithersburg, MD.
To learn more please visit:
www.mdvseia.camp7.org
This document provides a summary of the 2012 National Solar Jobs Census conducted by The Solar Foundation. Some key findings include:
- As of September 2012, the U.S. solar industry employed 119,016 workers, a 13.2% increase from 2011.
- Installation jobs increased the most over the past year, offsetting declines in manufacturing. Larger installation firms saw more dramatic growth.
- The solar industry is expected to grow employment by 17.2% (around 20,000 new jobs) in the next 12 months.
- Nearly all solar industry subsectors expect double-digit percentage job growth in the coming year. Installation firms anticipate adding around 12,000 new jobs, a 21% increase
The Solar Foundation's National Solar Jobs Census 2014 found that the U.S. solar industry employs 173,807 workers, a growth of 21.8% since 2013. Solar employment grew nearly 20 times faster than the overall economy and accounted for 1.3% of new U.S. jobs over the past year. The installation sector remains the largest, more than doubling in size since 2010. If growth continues, the Census predicts 210,060 solar workers within a year, driven by increasing demand before tax credits expire in 2017.
The document summarizes a report on solar jobs in California in 2013. It finds that California had 47,223 solar workers as of November 2013, concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area and Southern California. Solar employers in California expect to add 10,500 new solar jobs, a growth rate of 22.3%, by November 2014. California has been a leader in solar energy and jobs due to its renewable energy policies like renewable portfolio standards and solar rebate programs, which have led to over 10,000 MW of installed solar capacity, over 40% of the US total.
The document is a report analyzing the solar workforce in Minnesota in 2013. It finds that Minnesota had 864 solar workers in 2013 and has steadily increased its solar capacity over the past decade to 16.2 megawatts currently. Recent policy changes in Minnesota, including a solar electricity standard requiring utilities to source 1.5% of retail sales from solar by 2020, are expected to drive rapid growth in the state's solar market and significant increases in solar jobs over the next several years. The report provides a baseline of current solar employment to measure this expected future growth.
The document summarizes a report on solar jobs in Minnesota in 2013-2014. It found that:
1) The solar industry in Minnesota employs 864 workers, a 73% increase since 2012, and employers expect to add around 250 jobs (28% growth) by late 2014.
2) Most Minnesota solar establishments are involved in installation (56%) and sales/trade (16%), though manufacturing accounts for 14% of solar jobs.
3) The industry focuses on photovoltaics (81%) and water heating (41%), consistent with national trends.
The National Solar Jobs Census 2011 found that the U.S. solar industry employed over 100,000 workers, growing at nearly 10 times the rate of overall U.S. economy job growth. Solar jobs increased by 6,735 over the previous year with expectations of continued growth across sectors like manufacturing, installation, and sales. California led the nation with over 25,000 solar jobs while the top 20 states for solar employment accounted for over 85,000 jobs.
Solar employment in North Carolina grew from 3,100 in 2013 to 5,600 in 2014, adding over 200 jobs per month between November 2013 and November 2014. At over 80 percent year-over-year growth, the North Carolina solar industry grew nearly 40 times faster than overall employment in the state.
This document summarizes the state of the solar industry in Arizona in 2015. It finds that while the US solar industry grew 20.2% in 2015, adding over 35,000 jobs, Arizona saw a 24.5% reduction in solar jobs. Solar capacity additions in Arizona have stagnated since 2012, installing just 141 MW in 2015, less than neighboring Nevada. Utility-scale solar makes up most new capacity but the residential and commercial markets have struggled due to policy changes reducing the economics of rooftop solar.
This document explores sustainable funding models for solar workforce training programs as public funding decreases. It notes rapid growth in the solar industry and jobs, but limited and declining public funding for associated training. It proposes three new funding concepts: 1) Public-private partnerships to jointly fund training; 2) Revolving loan funds for trainees that are repaid after employment; and 3) Crowdsourcing training funding from industry. The document aims to facilitate a transition from public to private funding that maximizes efficient allocation of funds to training providers.
The U.S. solar industry currently employs nearly 174,000 workers across all 50 states, a growth of 86% over the past 5 years. Solar jobs are being created 20 times faster than the overall economy. In 2014, solar companies expect to add 36,000 new jobs, a growth rate of 20.9%. However, the scheduled reduction of the federal investment tax credit from 30% to 10% for commercial projects poses a threat to future job growth and may cause layoffs, especially in the solar installation sector which employs the most workers.
Solar jobs exist in all 50 U.S. states and grew nearly 20% in 2013, adding over 24,000 new jobs. California continues to lead the nation with over 47,000 solar jobs, followed by Arizona with 8,558 jobs. While the top four states for solar employment remained the same as 2012, some states experienced significant shifts, with Florida, New York, North Carolina, and Texas all moving up in the rankings. The report provides state-level data on total solar jobs and rankings for 2013 and 2012 for the top 20 states.
This research poster was created as a part of the 2014 Solar Symposium and is by The Solar Foundation.
The National Solar Jobs Census series is a product of The Solar Foundation®, conducted annually since 2010. The inaugural Census established the first credible employment baseline for the domestic solar industry.The Census surveys solar employers and quantifies jobs across all solar technologies and industry subsectors. Since 2010, employment has grown by 53%, representing nearly 50,000 new U.S. solar jobs.
This document analyzes the impact of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) jobs on the US workforce and economy. It finds that:
1) STEM jobs directly account for 33% of US employment and 39% of US GDP.
2) When including indirect and induced impacts, STEM supports 67% of all US jobs, 69% of US GDP, and $2.3 trillion in annual federal tax revenue.
3) Contrary to perceptions, 59% of the US STEM workforce does not hold a bachelor's degree, having various types of post-secondary training and education. STEM jobs exist across many industries and educational backgrounds.
The whole universe is divided into two types of resources, one is natural resources and the other is human resources. Human resources are said to be great asset to the organization. An organization cannot build a good team of working professionals without good human resources.
The study of absenteeism is very important for any industry. This project report consists of detailed study on the present rate of workers absenteeism at Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd., Hubli, investigate reasons, and suggest measures to reduce absenteeism.
This survey helps companies to determine how their workers think, what they want and concerns, so that improvement can be made and stronger relationship can be developed.
The measures and employees suggestions to reduce absenteeism will result in increasing efficiency profit, better working conditions and other fringe benefits to employees.
For this purpose a sample of 50 employees was selected and survey was done with the help of questionnaire and the result is analysed.
Absenteeism refers to unauthorized absence of the employers from job mean failure of employees to report for work when they are scheduled to work. When employer remains absent without permission or informing it he is willful absent without leave. Compare to other countries the problem of rate of employees absenteeism in India is great. When the employees takes time of on a scheduled working day with permission it is authorized absence.
In these days when the needs of country require greater emphasis upon increasing of productivity and the economic rational utilization of time and material at our disposal it is necessary to minimize absenteeism to the maximum possible extent.
Recent service indicates the following trends in absenteeism. The higher rate of pay the greater the length of service of the employee and the fewer the absence. As an organization grows there is a tendency towards higher rate of absenteeism.
Single employee are absent more frequently than married employees. Younger employees are absents more than older employees but later are absent for longer period of time. Unionized organization have higher absenteeism rather than non union organization. Wages could be directly linked to attendance and their performance at work.
Good leave record of the employees is an important factor in considering for more responsible position. Habitual absenteeism must be treat as a misconduct and they are liable for disciplinary action.
Andrea Luecke | Tracking Solar Jobs, Solar Jobs Census BriefingGW Solar Institute
The document summarizes the findings of The Solar Foundation's State Solar Jobs Census. It found that the U.S. solar industry employed over 142,000 workers in 2013, a 20% increase from 2012. California employs the most solar workers of any state at over 47,000, representing over 40% of total U.S. solar capacity and 1/3 of national solar employment. The census tracks employment trends in solar installation, manufacturing, project development, sales and distribution across all 50 states.
Quarterly Economic Trends for Ohio Oil and Gas Industries - April 2014Marcellus Drilling News
A quarterly report issued by Ohio's Dept. of Jobs and Family Services issues a report on how the Ohio shale industry is faring with respect economic impacts and the number of jobs. The April 2014 edition of that report shows in the two years from Q3 2011 to Q3 2013 core shale-related industry employment (like pipeline construction and well drilling) was up 5,763 (79.0 percent). Employees in core jobs had an average wage of $71,661.
Jobenomics nereta job creation summit presentation 14 june 2017Colleen LaRose
Chuck Vollmer has a huge vision for how to change urban economics into vibrant work environments. Jobenomics is an exciting opportunity for workforce and economic development professionals to try something truly revolutionary...if they are willing to collaborate!
Fact Sheet: Solar Myths & Misconceptions - The Costs of Going SolarThe Solar Foundation
This document from The Solar Foundation dispels common myths about the costs of solar energy. It summarizes that the upfront costs of solar installations can be challenging but financing options like power purchase agreements or solar leases allow homeowners to adopt solar without large upfront costs. Solar panels have low maintenance needs and typically pay for themselves within 7-15 years, with some areas seeing payback in as little as 5 years. Installing solar can also increase property values and help homes sell faster.
The U.S. economy is improving at a modest but positive pace, and business experts expect that trend to continue into next year and beyond. This was a theme echoed by several speakers Oct. 3 at a McCombs event called “The Economy in 2014: The Year of the Rebound?”
See the summary and video: The U.S. economy is improving at a modest but positive pace, and business experts expect that trend to continue into next year and beyond. This was a theme echoed by several speakers Oct. 3 at a McCombs event called “The Economy in 2014: The Year of the Rebound?” - See the summary and video: http://www.texasenterprise.utexas.edu/2013/10/17/finance/2014-year-rebound
Highlights
Jay Hartzell, professor of finance, University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business
“There are roughly three ways to get out of the debt problem: You grow your way out, you tax your way out, or you print money,” Hartzell said. “The growth forecast is not very strong for the next few years. It’s not clear we have the political will to tax our way out of it. So that leaves inflation, which many people have concerns about.”
Tyson Tuttle, CEO of Silicon Labs
Tuttle said a surge in investment in connected smart devices is driving a transformation of the tech industry. He expects low-cost, low-power devices to enable home and industrial automation, development of efficient smart grid and mobile technologies, and the advent of “big data.” “All of this is going to be enabled by new types of devices, chips and applications that people haven’t even thought of before."“This is going to create a lot of opportunities for startups, software creators, infrastructure providers, and certainly in our world.”
Daniel Nelson, CEO and founder of Datical
“By the end of 2014, there will be a glut of failed startups — and this is a really good thing, because they’re supposed to fail. The real question is, after those startups fail, what do those founders do?” Nelson said. “The virtuous cycle of entrepreneurism starts with failure. It starts with failing, learning, and trying again — and then failing, learning, and trying again.
Dennis McWilliams, CEO and founder of Apollo Endosurgery
“No other state, even California and New York, can compare to the resources we have in Texas for early-stage investment in new technologies,” McWilliams said. “We really are becoming a global economy of healthcare, and innovation that’s happening here in Texas is moving around the world.”
In September 2014, The Solar Foundation released a report entitled Brighter Future: A Study on
Solar in U.S. Schools. This seminal report found that 3,727 public and private K-12 schools in
the nation have solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, with a combined capacity of 490 megawatts
(MW). This report, released in August 2015, builds on that work and further examines the current state and potential for solar on K-12 schools in Maryland. Chief among the report's findings is that 1,867 public and private K-12 schools in the state could cost-effectively deploy solar energy systems.
The U.S. solar industry added over 31,000 jobs in 2014, a growth rate of 21.8% which was 20 times faster than the overall economy's growth rate of 1.1%. Solar jobs are projected to grow by 20.9% in 2015, 8 times greater than projected growth in oil, gas, and coal industries combined. One out of every 78 new jobs created in 2014 was from the solar industry.
The document is a transcript from a conference call discussing the Solar Foundation's National Solar Jobs Census 2013 Report. Some key points:
- The report found that as of November 2013, there were 142,698 solar jobs in the US, up from 119,000 the previous year, an increase of nearly 24,000 jobs.
- The vast majority (90%) of the new jobs were newly created positions rather than existing jobs taking on new solar responsibilities.
- Two-thirds of the new jobs were in the installation sector.
- Nearly half of solar employers expect to hire in 2014, adding around 22,000 new workers, compared to overall US job growth projected at 1.4%.
-
This document lists potential 30-year savings from installing solar photovoltaic systems on the roofs of 50 large school districts in the US at installed costs of $2/watt and $2.50/watt. It shows that New York City public schools could save $209-169 million over 30 years, with savings per student of $270-218. Los Angeles public schools could save $91-61 million, with savings per student of $145-96. The largest savings per student were for Hawaii Department of Education at $380-329. Overall, significant savings were projected for many large school districts across the US from installing solar panels on their roofs.
New report finds explosive growth in solar energy use by US schools over past decade, with installed capacity increasing from 303 kW to 457,000 kW. This saves schools $77.8 million annually in utility costs and reduces carbon emissions equivalent to taking nearly 100,000 cars off the road each year. While over 3,700 schools now use solar, providing benefits to 2.7 million students, potential remains for over 40,000 additional schools to install solar.
This document provides a summary of a report on solar power installations at schools in the US. It finds that there are significant financial, educational, environmental, and resiliency benefits to schools adopting solar energy systems. A key finding is that a baseline study identified massive untapped potential for solar power at US schools, with only 2% of schools currently utilizing solar, despite its benefits. The report was a collaborative effort between the Solar Foundation and the Solar Energy Industries Association, with the goal of documenting the benefits of solar energy for schools and growing its adoption.
Presentation by Julie Topoleski, CBO’s Director of Labor, Income Security, and Long-Term Analysis, at the 16th Annual Meeting of the OECD Working Party of Parliamentary Budget Officials and Independent Fiscal Institutions.
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Indira awas yojana housing scheme renamed as PMAYnarinav14
Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) played a significant role in addressing rural housing needs in India. It emerged as a comprehensive program for affordable housing solutions in rural areas, predating the government’s broader focus on mass housing initiatives.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Presentation by Rebecca Sachs and Joshua Varcie, analysts in CBO’s Health Analysis Division, at the 13th Annual Conference of the American Society of Health Economists.
How To Cultivate Community Affinity Throughout The Generosity JourneyAggregage
This session will dive into how to create rich generosity experiences that foster long-lasting relationships. You’ll walk away with actionable insights to redefine how you engage with your supporters — emphasizing trust, engagement, and community!
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
karnataka housing board schemes . all schemesnarinav14
The Karnataka government, along with the central government’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), offers various housing schemes to cater to the diverse needs of citizens across the state. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major housing schemes available in the Karnataka housing board for both urban and rural areas in 2024.
1. s!"
O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0
A Review of the U.S. Solar Workforce
National Solar Jobs Census 2010
!"
2. Acknowledgements:
The Solar Foundation ! wishes to thank all industry survey respondents. Your
assistance was critical in providing us with accurate and timely information.
The Solar Foundation ! would also like to acknowledge the following
institutions for their assistance in making this project come to fruition:
Cornell University’s New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations
Green LMI Consulting, Inc. and BW Research Partnership, Inc.
Energy Foundation
Solar Electric Power Association "
Solar Energy Industries Association "
For questions or comments about this report, please contact either:
Andrea Luecke, Executive Director (acting)
The Solar Foundation#!
575 7th Street, NW - Suite 400
Washington, DC! 20004
202-469-3750
research@solarfound.org
www.TheSolarFoundation.org
or
Philip Jordan, President
Green LMI Consulting
46 Northbridge Rd.
Mendon, MA 01756
617-395-8898
phil@greenlmi.com
www.GreenLMI.com
2
!#
3. Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary............................................................................................ p. 4
2. Introduction ..................................................................................................... p. 6
3. Labor Market Analysis: Primary Data................................................................ p. 9
3.1 Installation................................................................................................ p. 14
3.2 Manufacturing ......................................................................................... p. 19
3.3 Wholesale Trade ...................................................................................... p. 26
3.4 Utilities .................................................................................................... p. 31
3.5 Other.........................................................................................................p. 36
4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................ p. 38
5. Appendices ....................................................................................................... p. 40
5.1 Data Sources............................................................................................ p. 40
5.2 Methodology and Limitations ...................................................................p. 42
5.3 Secondary Data ...................................................................................... p. 46
5.4 State Data .................................................................................................p. 62
3
!"
4. 1. Executive Summary
The National Solar Jobs Census 2010 is the first attempt to quantify the current
employment and projected growth of the United States solar industry and is based on a
statistically valid sampling of employers throughout the nation.1 The rapid increase of
solar energy generation has warranted a credible study that examines the size and scope
of the industry that until now, has been lacking.
The Solar Foundation !, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, non-lobbying organization funding
solar research and education, recognized this gap and worked with Green LMI
Consulting, Cornell University and others to bring this important information to the
foreground. This report represents an unprecedented effort to understand the solar
industry’s labor market conditions and potential for growth.
In general, U.S. solar companies expect to add jobs at a pace that is much faster
than the general economy, and are highly optimistic regarding their overall revenue
growth over the near term. Specifically, as of August 2010, the U.S. solar industry
employs an estimated 93,000 solar workers - defined as those workers who spend at least
50% of their time supporting solar-related activities. Over the next 12 months, over 50%
of solar firms expect to add jobs, while only 2% expect to cut workers. This finding is
especially relevant given that the overall expected 12-month growth rate for the entire
U.S. economy is only about 2%.
Figure A: Current and Expected U.S. Solar Jobs
!"
#!$!!!"
%!$!!!"
&!$!!!"
'!$!!!"
(!!$!!!"
(#!$!!!"
(%!$!!!"
)*+*,-"#!(!" )*+*,-"#!(("
4
1 The data contained in this report include information gathered from approximately 2,500 employers drawn from every state
and from all types of companies; from those who manufacture solar components to those who install them. A rigorous
research methodology and strong participation from solar employers allows us to draw more comprehensive conclusions from
the data than from previous reports on the industry.
!"
5. Solar companies can be found in every state, and solar companies of all kinds
expect to experience employment growth over the coming year. As would be expected,
California is home to about 30% of all solar companies in the U.S., but other states, such
as Colorado, Pennsylvania, Texas, Michigan, and Arizona, report either large numbers of
solar companies or large numbers of workers at solar-related firms.2 On a regional basis,
the majority of the solar jobs are located in the West, followed by the Northeast, but jobs
are growing quickly in all regions.
By comparing the job growth expectations from our research and from existing
secondary sources, we can draw several important conclusions.
As of the end of August 2010:
• There are 93,502 solar workers in the United States, roughly double the
number estimated for 2009.
• Solar job growth over the next 12 months is anticipated to be 26%,
representing nearly 24,000 net new jobs. This expected growth rate is
significantly higher than the U.S. economy-wide expectation of 2% growth
over the same period.
• Nearly half of all firms expect their solar revenue to increase as a percentage
of their overall revenue over the next year.
• Over half of all solar employers expect to increase their number of solar jobs
in the next 12 months, while only 2% anticipate reducing solar staff.
• Solar jobs exist in all 50 states.
• Employers from all of the studied subsectors expect significant employment
growth over the next 12 months.
• The average solar installation firm employs 8 solar workers.
• The average solar manufacturing firm employs 24 solar workers.
• The average solar wholesale trade company employs four solar workers.
• The average utility that generates solar electric power employs four solar
workers.
These findings clearly illustrate that the solar industry is a strong and growing cluster
that is responsible for thousands of jobs across every state in the nation. The
unprecedented growth of the industry is providing much needed job creation despite an
historic economic and workforce downturn. The optimism of solar employers in the midst
of these conditions illustrates that job growth should continue for years to come.
5
2 See Appendix Section 5.4 for State-by-State data, where available.
!"
6. 2. Introduction
The solar industry is a strong and growing segment of our national economy. Over the past
ten years, companies that design, manufacture, sell, install, and maintain solar systems have
emerged in all regions of the United States, providing tens of thousands of jobs throughout the
country. These employment opportunities span numerous industries and occupational titles,
from skilled laborers to customer service and sales representatives.
In recent years, new technology, favorable legislative policies, and increased consumer
demand for clean, renewable sources of energy have led to even more rapid growth of the solar
industry. In fact, according to GTM Research, solar photovoltaic installations grew at a
Compound Annual Growth Rate of 61% between 2006 and 2009.3 Despite gloomy general
economic conditions in most sectors of our nation’s economy, the momentum generated by these
trends has led to increased optimism about the potential for continued growth of solar jobs.
Figure 1: U.S. Photovoltaic Electric Growth by Megawatts
Source: SEIA/GTM Research, U.S. SolarInsight, 2nd Quarter 2010 (Upside scenario)
This report is a comprehensive analysis of U.S. solar labor market conditions. Unlike
economic impact models that generate employment estimates based on revenue and other
economic data and rely on jobs-per-dollar (or jobs-per-megawatt) assumptions, this report
provides statistically valid and current data gathered directly from employers. The primary and
secondary data include information about all types of companies engaged in the production,
!"
#!!"
$!!"
%!!"
&!!"
'(!!!"
'(#!!"
#!!!" #!!'" #!!#" #!!)" #!!$" #!!*" #!!%" #!!+" #!!&" #!!," #!'!"
!"#
$%&'(#)&*+,(-+#./0,'&&'1%/02#344453464#
#-."/012"#!'!"3456789:8.;"
/<=:65<901"
6
3 SEIA/GTM Research, U.S. SolarInsight, 2nd Quarter 2010.
!"
7. sale, installation, and use of all solar technologies, ranging from photovoltaics to concentrating
solar power to solar thermal systems for the residential, commercial and utility sectors.4
The primary data contained in this report are drawn from a mixed-methodological survey
using direct contact (phone and internet) with solar employers in the United States. Information
was collected in July and August 2010 from both a measure of a so-called “known universe,”
which includes firms from industry and government databases, as well as a random sample of
businesses within various construction, wholesale trade, and manufacturing industries. This
combined approach, together with a large sample size of nearly 2,500 survey completions,
provides statistically valid results with a low margin of error (2.8-5.8% margin of error at 95%
confidence level). This rigor allows us to draw broad conclusions about the solar industry with a
high degree of confidence.
This report presents the information in several ways. The first section provides a national
analysis of the primary data collection from each subsector of the solar value chain, including
installation, wholesale trade, manufacturing, utilities, and all other firms. These conclusions are
compared to national secondary data, which is presented in Appendix 5.3.
This National Solar Jobs Census 2010 has been conducted by The Solar Foundation ! and
Green LMI Consulting, with assistance from BW Research Partnership. Cornell University
provided technical assistance in reviewing and validating the entire process, from data collection
through results analysis.
The research findings, which are being released for the first time in this report, provide
stakeholders with timely and credible information to understand the solar industry’s labor market
conditions and potential for further growth. This report is the first effort to collect primary data
from employers about the size and scope of the solar industry and its workforce needs. These
data are unprecedented and will hopefully inform future efforts of the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics to understand the solar labor markets.
It is important to note, however, that there are limitations to the data. Specifically, unlike
economic models that generate employment estimates based on revenue and other economic
conditions, the primary research findings in this report are drawn from actual survey responses by
solar employers. Though this is a highly effective method for collecting real-time information,
the employment estimates are based on those responses and therefore represent employers’ best
estimates on how many jobs they expect to add over the coming year.
The employment growth rates provided in this report are high in comparison with other
sectors over the same period. However, Green LMI Consulting and its partners have recently
conducted numerous, separate regional reports using similar methodology and survey questions
and have found the growth rates contained herein to be similar to those in other renewable
energy sectors. At the same time, employers in other sectors, such as healthcare and information
7
4 Information for this report was gathered from secondary sources (primarily relying on O*NETʼs solar occupational
classifications) and from original research from a statistically valid, random sample of solar employers in the United States.
See Erich C. Dierdorff, et. al, Greening of the World of Work: Implications for O*NET-SOC and New and Emerging
Occupations, February 2009.
!"
8. and communications technologies, are reporting much lower growth expectations
(approximately 4% annual growth) when presented with similar surveys. Therefore, although we
recognize that the data are based on employer estimates, solar employers in the United States are
more realistically confident in their optimism about employment growth than their counterparts
in other sectors.5
Courtesy and Copyright H&H Solar Energy Services Madison, Wisconsin
8
5 See http://coeccc.net/solar; http://coccc.net/ict; http://mpict.org/ict_study_phase2.html.
!"
9. 3. Labor Market Analysis: Primary Data
This section includes a labor market analysis of solar occupations and industries. In
addition to a summary of solar employment in the United States, it presents primary data for
installation, wholesale trade, manufacturing, utilities, and all other fields. Primary data includes
the survey responses from solar employers throughout the country, drawn from a census of
known employers and a random sample of companies from relevant industries. The one
exception is the utility data, which used a sample of utilities known to have integrated solar
technology.6 The research team also selected specific occupations or job areas for more in-depth
analysis, based on a literature review and discussion with industry experts.7
Overall, the primary data - or information gathered by our survey of solar employers -
indicate that there are currently 16,703 employment locations, employing 93,502 solar workers
(defined as those workers who spend at least 50% of their time on solar).8 The number of
these solar workers is expected to grow 26% rate, or by approximately 24,000 new jobs.
Figure 2: Current and Expected U.S. Solar Jobs
As further evidence of solar employer optimism, over 55% of surveyed firms expect to add
employees over the next 12 months, while only 2% expect to cut workers over the period, as
!"
#!$!!!"
%!$!!!"
&!$!!!"
'!$!!!"
(!!$!!!"
(#!$!!!"
(%!$!!!"
)*+*,-"#!(!" )*+*,-"#!(("
9
6 The Solar Electric Power Association # tracks utility solar integration annually with the Utility Solar Electric Survey. The
respondents to the most recent survey comprised the list for the utility sample.
7 See Appendix Sections 5.1 and 5.2 for a list of data sources and an explanation of the studyʼs methodology.
8 For the purposes of this report, workers that spend at least 50% of their time on solar activities are referred to as “solar
workers.” These data come from direct survey responses for all sectors except installation. For an explanation of how
installation-related solar employment was calculated, please see Appendix Section 5.2.
!"
10. illustrated in Figure 2 below. These findings show an industry that is clearly growing much more
rapidly than the economy as a whole, which is expected to experience employment growth of
only two percent over the coming year.
Figure 3: 12-Month Hiring Expectations - All Solar Firms
Several screener questions were asked of employers to ensure that our sample included
only solar firms. The survey respondents were asked to select the appropriate subsector to which
their firm belongs, choosing from installation, wholesale trade, manufacturing, utilities,9 or, for
those who did not fit neatly into a category, “other.” Many firms reported that their work
spanned several subsectors, illustrating the interconnected and interrelated nature of the solar
industry and its workers. Though this makes it harder for researchers to categorize companies, it
shows that solar firms are active in multiple traditional industry sectors, and that growth in any
given sector, such as utility energy production or manufacturing, is important to firms outside of
those sectors as well.10
10
9 The utility industry sector is unique, with partial, if not full, regulatory oversight. A solar Power Generating Utility is not a
unique industry segment, but rather a function in a utility spanning many departments. For these reasons, the utility sample,
as well as the instrument are different from those used for the other sectors. The “utilities” sample was small, relative to the
2,500 overall respondents, and therefore does not register in Figures 4 and 5 or Table 1.
10 For the purposes of this report, workers are included in their primary subsector, assigned based on the distribution of firms
in the sample. For detailed methodology of survey extrapolations, please see Appendix Section 5.2.
Increase
55.8%
Stay the same
32.6%
Decrease
2.2%
Don't know/
Refused
9.4%
!"
11. Figure 4: Percentage of Respondents, by Subsector
Table 1: Data by Subsector - # of Solar Workers
Subsector 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Growth Percentage
Growth
Installation 43,934 53,793 9,859 22%
Manufacturing 24,916 33,982 9,066 36%
Wholesale Trade 11,744 15,993 4,249 36%
Other 12,908 14,088 1,180 9%
Total 93,502 117,855 24,353 26%
!"# $!"# %!"# &!"# '!"# (!"# )!"# *!"#
+,-./,01.23-4#
51672#
869:7;,:7#<2,=7#
>-;1,::,?9-#
@7207-1#9/#A32B;C#DE#
F0?G31E#
11
!
12. Figure 5: Data by Subsector - # of Solar Workers
Solar employers can be found throughout the nation, though the majority of firms come
from the Western United States, followed by the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic Region.
Figure 6: Breakdown of Solar Employers by Region.
!" #!$!!!" %!!$!!!" %#!$!!!"
&'()*+,)*"-.,/*"
01'*."
2,345,614.738"
93+1,)),:(3"
-(1,)"
;!%!"<(=+"
>*?"<(=+"@%;"2(31'+A"
12
Lower
Midwest
6.6%
Northeast/
Mid-Atlantic
20.3%
Southeast
11.0%
Upper
Midwest
8.9% West
52.4%
!
13. Across all of the occupations that were identified for more detailed study, the following five
are expected to grow the fastest over the next year:
1. Photovoltaic installers (51-66% growth)
2. Electricians with specific experience in solar installations (42-55% growth)
3. Sales occupations at wholesale trade firms (40-49% growth)
4. Sales representatives or estimators at installation firms (39-47% growth)
5. Roofers with specific experience in solar installations (36-49% growth)
Solar employers also report difficulty finding qualified workers. This surprising result, given the
current unemployment rate, could be due to many factors, such as lagging workforce
development. It is clear, however, that solar jobs are growing rapidly and are hard to fill, which
typically indicates fertile opportunities for job seekers.
13
!
14. 3.1 Installation
The research includes responses from 1,425 installation firms, yielding a statistically valid
dataset of employment information representative of the approximately 10,000 locations of
companies that derive at least some of their revenue from solar goods and services. These
companies employ 43,934 solar workers.
Solar installation firms expect to add 9,859 solar workers over the next 12 months,
representing 22% growth.
Figure 7: Current and Expected Solar Jobs at Installation Firms
Interestingly, the majority of firms reported that they receive all or most of their revenue
from solar projects, while about one in four firms reported that solar makes up less than a quarter
of their business.11
!"
#!$!!!"
%!$!!!"
&!$!!!"
'!$!!!"
(!$!!!"
)!$!!!"
*+,+-."%!#!" *+,+-."%!##"
14
11 As would be expected, the number of firms that report most to all of their revenue is solar-related is higher in the known
universe than the random sample.
!
15. Figure 8: Solar as a Percentage of Revenue - Installation
As illustrated in Figures 9 and 10 below, 92% of firms install photovoltaic systems, while
just over half install solar hot water systems, and the majority of firms attribute the largest
percentage of their labor hours to photovoltaic systems. This illustrates the trend that many
companies install more than one type of system.
Figure 9: Firms by Technology - Installation
1.2%
24.3%
8.1%
8.8%
57.7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Don't know/ Refused
Less than a quarter (1% to 24%)
A quarter to almost half (25% to 49%)
Half to three-quarters (50% to 75%)
Most to all (76% to 100%)
92.1%
50.6%
21.9%
8.4%
0.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Photovoltaic Water heating
(including pool
heating)
Space heating Cooling system Don't know/
Refused
15
!
16. Figure 10: Solar Technologies by Percentage of Labor - Installation
U.S. installation companies are working on systems of varying sizes, though, as would be
expected, the majority of installation firms are working on smaller systems, as illustrated in Figure
11 below.
Figure 11: Percentage of Firms Working on Systems, by Size - Installation
3%
2%
8.9%
51.2%
6%
8%
12.6%
15.2%
13.0%
13.0%
17.2%
9.5%
74.7%
75.7%
59.5%
22.9%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Space heating
Cooling system
Water heating (including
pool heating)
Photovoltaic
Most to all (76% to 100%) Half to three-quarters (50% to 75%)
A quarter to almost half (25% to 49%) Less than a quarter (1% to 24%)
Don't know/ Refused
1.0%
25.2%
32.7%
56.9%
76.0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Don't know/ Refused
Large commercial and industrial or utility scale
projects 201 kilowatts or larger
Medium to large commercial and industrial
systems from 51 to 200 kilowatts
Small commercial systems from six to 50
kilowatts
Residential systems
16
!
17. Table 2 and Figure 12 below illustrate installation-related occupational data, including the
percent of firms that employ the occupation, the percent of firms that report difficulty finding
qualified applicants that meet their firms’ hiring expectations, and the annual expected growth
rate.
Table 2: Occupational Data - Installation
Occupation/Category Percent Employing Difficulty hiring Growth
Solar water or pool heating installers or
technicians
33% 65% 29-36%
Solar photovoltaic installers or
technicians
72% 65% 51-66%
Sales representatives or estimators 70% 64% 39-47%
Solar designers or engineers 62% 67% 33-36%
Solar installation managers or project
foremen
61% 65% 32-36%
HVAC technicians with specific skills in
solar installations
11% 64% 25-39%
Energy auditors 20% 56% 31-40%
Site assessors and/or remote evaluators 37% 64% 35-38%
Plumbers with specific skills in solar
installations
17% 59% 25-32%
Electricians with specific skills in solar
installations
53% 62% 42-55%
Roofers with specific skills in solar
installations
15% 47% 36-49%
17
!
18. Figure 12: Occupational Data - Installation
In Figure 12 above, the diameter of the bubble represents the percentage of firms from the
sample that hire each occupation, the vertical axis illustrates the 12-month growth rate, and
the horizontal axis represents the percentage of firms that report difficulty hiring.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
45% 55% 65%
12-monthGrowth
Difficulty Hiring
(1) Solar water or pool heating installers or technicians (2) Solar photovoltaic installers or technicians
(3) Sales representatives or estimators (4) Solar designers or engineers
(5) Solar installation managers or project foremen (6) HVAC technicians with specific skills in solar installations
(7) Energy auditors (8) Site assessors and/or remote evaluators
(9) Plumbers with specific skills in solar installations (10) Electricians with specific skills in solar installations
(11) Roofers with specific skills in solar installations
18
!
19. 3.2 Manufacturing
Similar to installation firms, the solar manufacturing firms surveyed for this study can be
found across the nation, producing goods across many technology types and selling them
directly to consumers and to distributors. Manufacturers also expect robust revenue and
employment growth over the next 12 months.
As might be expected, the majority of firms sell goods to both distributors and consumers,
though only about one in nine sell exclusively to consumers. The Solar Foundation ! asked
specifically about whether manufacturers sell products directly to customers or to other
businesses.
Figure 13: Solar Sales - Percentage of Manufacturing Firms, by Sales Channel
The surveyed firms domestically manufacture a variety of products, though the majority
manufacture photovoltaic systems.
11.4%
29.9%
53.0%
5.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Sell solar products
directly to customers
Sell products to firms
that distribute solar
goods and services
Both, sell directly to
customers as well as
firms that distribute
solar goods and
services
Don't know/ Refused
19
!
20. Figure 14: Percentage of Firms by Product - Manufacturing
The Solar Foundation ! also interviewed component manufacturers as part of its sample.
Of the photovoltaic producers surveyed, the highest percentage manufacture racking and
modules at their U.S. locations, while the fewest produce ingots and glass.
Figure 15: Photovoltaic Manufacturing, by Component
64.6%
27.8%
21.1% 18.0% 15.2% 13.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Photovoltaic Solar water
heating (not
including pool
heating)
Solar space
heating or
cooling systems
Concentrating
solar power
Solar pool
heating
Don't know/
Refused
4%
4%
7%
9.4%
12.8%
13.3%
17.2%
28.9%
28.9%
93.9%
90.6%
90.0%
88.9%
80.6%
83.3%
80.0%
68.3%
68.3%
5%
7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Glass
Ingots
Wafers
Laminates
Material feedstocks
Cells
Inverters
Modules
Racking
Photovoltaic
Yes No Don't know/ Refused
20
!
21. Over 40% of the manufacturing firms surveyed produce solar products exclusively, while
for one in three, solar represents less than 50% of their revenue.
Figure 16: Percentage of Revenue Related to Solar Products - Manufacturing
Over 40% of firms expect their percentage of revenue from solar sales to increase, while
only 2% expect it to decrease. Employers indicated that they expect an average of nearly 44%
growth in their solar related sales revenue.
Figure 17: 12-Month Expectations of Revenue Attributed to Solar Sales - Manufacturing
21
6.0%
33.0%
21.0%
40.1%
0% 20% 40%
Don't know/ Refused
Less than half (1% to 49%)
Most but not all (50% to 99%)
All of it (100%)
Increase
40.7%
Stay the same
47.8%
Decrease
2.2%
Don't know/
Refused
9.3%
!
22. Solar manufacturers employ nearly 25,000 solar workers and expect strong growth over the
coming year. The companies anticipate adding about 9,000 solar workers over the next 12
months, an astounding 36% growth rate, and about double of the employers’ expectations for
their overall employment growth (including non-solar workers). The growth in U.S. solar
manufacturing jobs is clearly one of the most important and interesting findings of the research.
22
!
23. Figure 18: Current and Expected Solar Jobs in Manufacturing
Nearly two in three firms expect to add employees over the next 12 months, while virtually
no firms expect to cut workers over the period.
Figure 19: 12-Month Employment Expectations - Manufacturing
The Solar Foundation ! also asked manufacturing firms about eight specific occupations
and occupational categories, specifically referencing those employees that spend at least some of
!"
#$!!!"
%!$!!!"
%#$!!!"
&!$!!!"
&#$!!!"
'!$!!!"
'#$!!!"
(!$!!!"
)*+*,-"&!%!" )*+*,-"&!%%"
23
Increase
62.4%
Stay the same
26.9%
Decrease
0.8%
Don't know/
Refused
9.9%
!
24. their time on solar-related business. These include administrative, legal, finance, technical, and
other staff. Table 3 and Figure 20 below illustrate the growth rate, difficulty hiring, and
percentage of firms who hire for each of these eight occupations.
Table 3: Occupational Data - Manufacturing
Occupation/Category Percent Employing Difficulty hiring Growth
Production Workers 67% 41% 32-45%
First-line supervisors or managers of
production and operating workers
62% 46% 30-36%
Accountants and accounting clerks or
finance staff
65% 20% 13-15%
Engineers (all types) 74% 53% 31-38%
Administrative assistants and clerical
workers
60% 14% 19-22%
Sales Occupations 72% 48% 26-29%
Marketing staff 54% 44% 32-37%
In-house legal staff 16% 26% 9%
24
!
25. Figure 20: Occupational Data - Manufacturing
In Figure 20 above, the diameter of the bubble represents the percentage of firms from the
sample that hire each occupation, the vertical axis illustrates the 12-month growth rate, and
the horizontal axis represents the percentage of firms that report some or great difficulty hiring
applicants that meet their firms’ expectations regarding qualifications and/or experience.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
12-monthGrowth
Difficulty Hiring
(1) Production and operating workers
(2) First-line supervisors or managers of production and operating workers
(3) Accountants and accounting clerks or finance staff
(4) Engineers (all types)
(5) Administrative assistants and clerical workers
(6) Sales occupations
(7) Marketing staff
(8) In-house legal staff
25
!
26. 3.3 Wholesale Trade
One of the critical, yet often overlooked, stages of the value chain of the solar industry is
wholesale trade and distribution. The employers in solar wholesale trade sell all types of systems,
from residential solar pool heaters to commercial-scale photovoltaic systems. They also sell
components such as brackets, valves, raw materials, extruded parts, and other items that are
critical to the design and construction of solar projects. The firms sell directly to consumers and
also to other businesses, and can be found in every state in the nation.
Figure 21: Wholesale Solar Sales - Consumer Direct v. Business to Business
The surveyed firms sell a variety of products, though the majority sell photovoltaic systems,
followed by solar water heaters.
Figure 22: Percentage of Firms by Product Sales - Wholesale Trade
45.8%
10.2%
41.8%
2.2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Sell solar products
and/or services
directly to customers
Sell products and/or
services to firms that
distribute solar goods
and services
Both, sell directly to
customers as well as
firms that distribute
solar goods and
services
Don't know/ Refused
82.1%
55.2%
34.2% 31.9%
10.4%
3.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Photovoltaic
panels
Solar water
heating (not
including pool
heating)
Solar pool
heating
Solar space
heating and
cooling systems
Concentrating
solar power
Don't know/
Refused
26
!
27. More than one in three of the trade firms surveyed sell solar products exclusively, while a
similar number report that less than half of their business is related to solar products (by revenue).
Figure 23: Percentage of Revenue Related to Solar Products - Wholesale Trade
Over 42% of firms expect their percentage of revenue from solar sales to increase, while
fewer than 5% expect it to decrease. Employers indicated that they expect an average of over
34% growth in their solar related sales revenue.
Figure 24: 12-Month Expectations of Revenue Attributed to Solar Sales - Wholesale Trade
The Solar Foundation ! surveyed nearly 500 solar wholesale trade firms for this study. Like
their counterparts in other segments of the value chain, solar trade firms expect strong
2.0%
36.6%
26.7%
34.7%
0% 20% 40%
Don't know/ Refused
Less than half (1% to 49%)
Most but not all (50% to 99%)
All of it (100%)
27
Increase
42.2%
Stay the same
45.4%
Decrease
4.7%
Don't know/
Refused
7.7%
!
28. employment growth over the next 12 months, with over 54% expecting to add employees and
fewer than 2% expecting to cut workers.
Figure 25: 12 Month Hiring Expectations - Wholesale Trade
These wholesale trade firms employ about 11,700 solar workers. Employers report an
anticipated 22-25% growth rate overall, or 8,700 new jobs across all divisions and employee
types. When asked specifically about solar workers, the growth rate swells to 36-47%, or
approximately 4,200 of the 8,700 total new jobs in the sector.
Figure 26: Current and Expected Solar Jobs in Wholesale Trade
!"
#$!!!"
%$!!!"
&$!!!"
'$!!!"
(!$!!!"
(#$!!!"
(%$!!!"
(&$!!!"
('$!!!"
)*+*,-"#!(!" )*+*,-"#!(("
28
Increase
53.6%
Stay the same
34.3%
Decrease
1.6%
Don't know/
Refused
10.4%
!
29. The Solar Foundation ! also asked trade firms about eight specific occupations and
occupational categories. These include administrative, legal, finance, technical, and other staff.
Table 4 and Figure 27 below illustrate the growth rate, difficulty hiring, and percentage of firms
who hire for each of the eight occupations.
Table 4: Occupational Data - Wholesale Trade
Occupation/Category Percent Employing Difficulty hiring Growth
Production Workers 39% 50% 35-46%
First-line supervisors or managers of
production and operating workers
40% 57% 26-36%
Accountants and accounting clerks or
finance staff
42% 24% 11-14%
Engineers (all types) 44% 59% 26-33%
Administrative assistants and clerical
workers
42% 20% 26-37%
Sales Occupations 68% 57% 40-49%
Marketing staff 40% 42% 21-28%
In-house legal staff (note small sample
size)
5% 27% -29%-6%
29
!
30. Figure 27: Occupational Data - Wholesale Trade
In Figure 27 above, the diameter of the bubble represents the percentage of firms from the
sample that hire each occupation, the vertical axis illustrates the 12-month growth rate, and
the horizontal axis represents the percentage of firms that report some or great difficulty hiring
applicants that meet their firms’ expectations regarding qualifications and/or experience.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
12-monthGrowth
Difficulty Hiring
(1) Production and operating workers
(2) First-line supervisors or managers of production and operating workers
(3) Accountants and accounting clerks or finance staff
(4) Engineers (all types)
(5) Administrative assistants and clerical workers
(6) Sales occupations
(7) Marketing staff
(8) In-house legal staff
30
!
31. 3.4 Utilities
In addition to the production, sale, distribution and installation of solar systems, The Solar
Foundation ! also surveyed utilities on their solar employment and expectations over the next
year. The 79 firms that responded to the survey were drawn from a sample of utilities that
represent nearly 99% of all the utilities that are active in solar energy.12 However, as illustrated
in Figure 28, according to the survey responses, solar still makes up only a small percentage of
these utilities’ overall energy profile.
Figure 28: Utilities’ Percentage of Energy from Solar
Despite these relatively small percentages, over 90% of the utilities surveyed believe that
their solar profiles will increase in the coming year, and about one in two believe that the
increase will be greater than 5%. Only 2.6% of utilities expect a decrease in their solar
production over the next 24 months.
31
12 2009 Utility Solar Rankings, Solar Electric Power Association, May 2010. Available at: www.SolarElectricPower.org
More than 5%
10.1%
Between 3%
and 5%
2.5%Between 1%
and 2%
11.4%
Less than 1%
69.6%
Don't know/
Refused
6.3%
!
32. Figure 29: 24-Month Expected Change in Solar Profile
The utilities surveyed work on systems of all types, though all are involved in photovoltaics,
and over 50% of the utilities are involved in solar hot water systems.
Figure 30: Solar Utilities by Technology
Specifically regarding photovoltaics, the utilities work on a variety of systems, and though
the majority work on systems of various sizes, a large number work exclusively on residential
systems.
1.3%
1.3%
1.3%
5.1%
40.5%
50.6%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Don't know/ Refused
Large decrease, 5% or more over the next 24
months
Small decrease, less than 5% over the next 24
months
Expect to stay the same
Small increase, less than 5% over the next 24
months
Large increase, 5% or more over the next 24
months
100.0%
52.6%
19.2%
15.4%
9.0%
3.8%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Photovoltaic Solar water heating
(not including pool
heating)
Concentrating solar
power
Solar pool heating Space heating Cooling system
32
!
33. Figure 31: Photovoltaic System Size - Utilities
The utilities were also asked about whether they tend to outsource their solar-related work.
Over 40% of respondents indicated that work was done internally, and only 16% reported that
they outsource half or more of all solar work.
Figure 32: Utility Outsourcing
The 79 solar utilities that responded to The Solar Foundation ! survey employ over 159,000
workers across all divisions. Nearly 1,000 of those, or 0.6%, spend at least half of their time
working on renewable energy projects, and almost 400, or 37% of those workers spend at least
25.6%
7.7%
1.3% 1.3%
61.5%
2.6%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Residential
systems
Small
commercial
systems from 6
to 50 kilowatts
Medium to
large
commercial
and industrial
systems from
51 to 200
kilowatts
Large
commercial
and industrial
or utility scale
projects 201
kilowatts or
more
A combination
of these
Don't know/
Refused
6.6%
40.8%
36.8%
15.8%
0% 20% 40%
Don't know/ Refused
None, all solar-related work is done internally
Some, but less than half of the total work is
outsourced
Half or more of all the solar-related work is
outsourced
33
!
34. half of their time on solar projects. Over the next 24 months,13 approximately one in three
utilities expect to add employees and only 1.3% expect to cut workers that spend at least half of
their time on renewable energy projects.
Figure 33: 24-Month Renewable Energy Employment Expectations - Utilities
Utilities expect this growth to occur at a rapid pace. For workers that spend at least half of
their time on renewable energy projects, utilities expect two year growth of 17-31%. For workers
that spend at least half of their time on solar projects, the two-year growth expectation swells to
32-60%. Table 5 and Figure 34 illustrate the 24-month occupational data collected on utility
firms.
Table 5: 24-Month Occupational Data - Utilities
Occupation/Category Percent Employing Difficulty hiring Growth
Solar utility procurement 53% 41% 18-29%
Solar customer management 74% 44% 12-14%
Solar planners 63% 49% 16-41%
Solar support staff 71% 32% 20-47%
34
13 Based on the unique regulatory structure of the utility sector, it was determined that employers would provide more reliable
information if asked about 24-month, rather than 12-month employment growth.
More
32.9%
Same number
59.5%
Less
1.3%
Don't know/
Refused
6.3%
!
35. Figure 34: 24-Month Occupational Data - Utilities
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
0%
10%
20%
30%
20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
24-monthGrowth
Difficulty Hiring
(1) Solar utility procurement (2) Solar customer management (3) Solar planners (4) Solar support staff
In Figure 34 above, the diameter of the bubble represents the percentage of firms from the
sample that hire each occupation, the vertical axis illustrates the 24-month growth rate, and
the horizontal axis represents the percentage of firms that report some or great difficulty hiring
applicants that meet their firms’ expectations regarding qualifications and/or experience.
35
!
36. 3.5 Other
Approximately 200 solar firms that participated in this study did not identify with a specific
category presented to them. For instance, 24% reported that their firm is engaged in research
and development of solar technologies. Similar to their counterparts, over half of the “other”
firms that participated in this study expect to add employees over the next 12 months, and more
than one in three expect revenue attributed to solar goods and services to increase over the
period.
The firms in this category currently employ nearly 13,000 workers. Employment growth
rates at these firms are expected to be much lower as compared to the specific solar sectors
studied in this report. Over the next year, other firms expect to add nearly 1,200 new solar jobs
over the coming year (9.1% annual growth).
Figure 35: Percentage of Revenue Attributed to Solar - Other
36
5.0%
39.7%
25.6%
29.6%
0% 20% 40%
Don't know/ Refused
Less than half (1% to 49%)
Most but not all (50% to 99%)
All of it (100%)
!
37. Figure 36: 12-Month Expectations of Revenue Attributed to Solar Goods and Services - Other
Figure 37: 12 Month Hiring Expectations - Other
Increase
37.1%
Stay the same
42.1%
Decrease
6.6%
Don't know/
Refused
14.2%
37
More
47.1%
Same number
44.4%
Less
1.1%
Don't know/
Refused
7.4%
!
38. 4. Conclusion
This report, the first national solar workforce study to collect employer data from all
segments of the industry, finds that solar firms can be found in every state and employ tens of
thousands of workers throughout the country. As would be expected, the solar industry includes
companies of all sizes and firms that are exclusively solar as well as those that include solar as
just one part of their overall business. Our rigorous research methodology and strong
participation from solar employers allows us to draw more comprehensive conclusions from the
data than from previous reports.
Individual states do not have the same distribution of installation, manufacturing, and
wholesale trade firms, or utilities employing solar, as seen at the national level. !To more fully
understand state-level solar labor markets, more detailed state-by-state data collection, research
and analysis is needed. This report will provide important information to guide those efforts.
Overall, solar firms expect to add jobs at a pace that is much faster than the general
economy, and are highly optimistic regarding their overall revenue growth over the near term.
Specifically, firms that derive at least some revenue from solar goods and services employ over
93,000 solar workers. Over the next 12 months, over half of all solar firms expect to add jobs,
while only 2% expect to cut workers.
By comparing the job growth expectations from our research and from existing secondary
sources, we can draw several important conclusions:
1. Solar companies employ 93,000 solar workers, and expect the number of solar workers to
grow by 26% or 24,000 new solar workers.
2. Nearly half of all firms expect their solar revenue to increase as a percentage of their overall
revenue over the next year.
3. Employers from all of the studied subsectors and all regions of the country expect
significant employment growth over the next 12 months.
These findings clearly illustrate that the solar industry is a strong and growing cluster that is
responsible for thousands of jobs across every state in the nation. The unprecedented growth of
the industry is providing much needed job creation despite a historic economic and workforce
downturn. The optimism of solar employers in the midst of these conditions should yield
continued job growth for years to come.
38
!
40. 5. Appendices
5.1 Data Sources
EMSI Data Sources and Calculations
Industry Data
In order to capture a complete picture of industry employment, EMSI basically combines covered
employment data from Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) produced by the
Department of Labor with total employment data in Regional Economic Information System
(REIS) published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), augmented with County Business
Patterns (CBP) and Nonemployer Statistics (NES) published by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Projections are based on the latest available EMSI industry data, 15-year past local trends in each
industry, growth rates in statewide and (where available) sub-state area industry projections
published by individual state agencies, and (in part) growth rates in national projections from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
State Data Sources
This report uses state data from the following agencies: Alabama Department of Industrial
Relations; Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development; Arizona Department of
Commerce, Research Administration; Arkansas Department of Workforce Services; California
Labor Market Information Department; Colorado Department of Labor and Employment;
Connecticut did not provide us with a data source; Delaware Office of Occupational and Labor
Market Information, Delaware Wages 2004; District of Columbia did not provide us with a data
source; Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation; Georgia Department of Labor, Workforce
Information and Analysis, Occupational Information Services Unit; Hawaii Department of Labor
and Industrial Relations, Research and Statistics Office; Idaho Department of Labor; Illinois
Department of Employment Security, Employment Projections; Indiana Department of Workforce
Development; Iowa Workforce Development; Kansas Department of Labor, Labor Market
Information Services, Kansas Wage Survey; Kentucky Office of Employment and Training;
Louisiana Department of Labor; Maine did not provide us with a data source; Maryland
Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Office of Labor Market Analysis and
Information; Massachusetts did not provide us with a data source; Michigan Department of Labor
and Economic Growth, Bureau of Labor Market Information and Strategic Initiatives; Minnesota
Department of Employment and Economic Development; Mississippi Department of Employment
Security; Missouri Department of Economic Development; Montana Department of Labor and
Industry, Research and Analysis Bureau; Nebraska Workforce Development; Nevada Department
of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation, Information Development and Processing Division,
Research and Analysis Bureau; New Hampshire Department of Employment Security; New Jersey
Department of Labor and Workforce Development; New Mexico Department of Labor, Bureau of
Economic Research and Analysis; New York Department of Labor, Division of Research and
Statistics; North Carolina Employment Security Commission, Labor Market Information Division;
North Dakota Job Service, Labor Market Information Center; Ohio Department of Job and Family
Services, Labor Market Information Division; Oklahoma Employment Security Commission;
Oregon Employment Department, Oregon Labor Market Information System; Pennsylvania
40
!
41. Department of Labor and Industry, Center for Workforce Information and Analysis; Rhode Island
did not provide us with a data source; South Carolina Employment Security Commission, Labor
Market Information Department; South Dakota Department of Labor, Labor Market Information
Division; Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Research and Statistics
Division; Texas Workforce Commission; Utah Department of Workforce Services; Vermont did
not provide us with a data source; Virginia Employment Commission, Economic Information
Services; Washington State Employment Security Department, Labor Market and Economic
Analysis Branch; West Virginia Bureau of Employment Programs, Research Information &
Analysis Division; Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, Bureau of Workforce
Information; Wyoming Department of Employment, Research and Planning.
41
!
42. 5.2 Data Limitations and Methodology
The following three-phased methodology describes the survey methodology to gather employer
information from both self-identified or known solar employers, those firms that are connected to
solar industry associations and can be found on solar employer databases, and unknown solar
employers that are found in industry classifications that are more likely to have solar employers.
This methodology describes the process that was followed for all of the solar employer surveys
except for those completed by utilities.
Phase 1: Develop, classify and analyze a database of self-identified or known solar employers.
The first phase created a comprehensive database of all known or self-identified solar employers
across the country. This database was developed by a collaborative effort between the national
solar industry associations and partners. The comprehensive database was developed from all of
the partners’ contact information of employers. Duplicates were identified and removed
following a stringent evaluation of firm phone numbers, locations, and firm names.
The database of employers did not include variables that consistently identified which sector
(manufacturing, installation, wholesale trade, research & development, ...) each employer was
involved in, the size of the employer, or whether the employer had a single location or
represented multiple locations.
Phase 2: Survey of self-identified or known solar employers.
The second phase of the survey research was a census, using online and telephone surveys of all
solar employers from the database developed in phase one. Employers were asked which sector
they were involved in (installation, manufacturing, wholesale trade, research & development and
other) and based on their response they were forwarded to the appropriate survey instrument. All
employers in the database with email information were sent multiple online invitations and for
those that did not complete an online survey, they were called up to three times. The employers
without email information were called up to five times and asked to participate in the survey by
completing a brief phone survey. These results represent the solar employer community that is
connected to regional and national solar trade associations.
It is important to note that surveys were completed for each employment location and not
necessarily for each firm. So if a solar employer was asked to participate in a survey, s/he would
be asked about the employment profile of a given location and not of the entire firm.
Margin of error: Survey of self-identified or known solar employers.
The overall margin of error for the known universe of the solar employer survey, at the 95 percent
level of confidence, is between +/- 1.06 percent and +/- 1.76 percent (depending on the
distribution of each question) for questions answered by all 2,181 employers from the universe of
7,440 solar employment locations estimated in the known universe. This also represents a
response rate of 29 percent from the database of known solar employers, which includes
employers in manufacturing, installation, wholesale trade, research & development and other
related solar industries.
42
!
43. It is important to note that questions asked of smaller sub-groups of respondents will have a
margin of error greater than +/-1.76 percent, with the exact margin of error dependent on the
number of respondents within each sub-group as well as the distribution of responses.
Phase 3: A random sampling of employers in industry classifications that are most likely to have
unknown solar employers.
The final phase of the survey research was a sampling of employers in specific industries within
wholesale trade, manufacturing, and the construction (installation) industries. The survey was
completed over the phone and the sample was stratified by industry, region and firm size (4 or
less employees or 5 or more employees). These results represent the solar employers that make
up the wholesale trade, manufacturing, and construction industry employers within the industry
classifications noted below.
It is important to note that the percentage of overlap between the known and unknown universe
of solar employers was calculated based on the incidence of firms that were sampled as part of
the unknown universe but also found to be in the known universe file or firms that indicated they
had already completed a similar survey. The resulting calculation of overlapping firms was taken
out of the total estimate of firms in the known universe of solar employers.
Wholesale trade: Provides the cleanest opportunity to interview firms that were not in the known
universe list because there are two NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) codes
that are very specific to solar distributors/ wholesalers:
42372031 – Solar energy system supplier, and parts wholesaler
42372032 - Solar energy equipment wholesaler.
According to InfoUSA, there are 1,558 firms that indicated one of these two wholesale trade
designations as their primary industry classification and 778 that indicated them as their
secondary classification. All 2,336 firms that identified one of these two NAICS codes as their
primary or secondary industry classification were called and asked whether they were in the
solar industry and if they would participate in the survey.
Manufacturing: Industry classifications for manufacturing related to solar were not as specifically
identified with solar work. Three NAICS codes were identified with the highest expected
concentration of firms that manufacture solar products and components. These NAICS codes
were:
333611 – Turbine and turbine generator set unit manufacturing
334413 - Semiconductor and related device manufacturing
335911 - Storage battery manufacturing.
According to InfoUSA, there are 2,582 firms that indicated one of these three manufacturing
designations as their primary industry classification and 1,994 that indicated them as there
43
!
44. secondary classification. All 4,576 firms that were identified in one of these three NAICS codes
as their primary or secondary industry classification were called and asked whether they were in
the solar industry and if they would participate in the survey.
Construction: Industry classifications for the construction industry related to solar were not
specifically identified with solar work. Five NAICS codes were identified with the highest
expected concentration of firms that provide solar installation services. These NAICS codes were:
236118 Residential remodelers
238160 Roofing contractors
238210 Electrical contractors
238220 Plumbing & HVAC contractors
238990 All other specialty trade contractors.
According to InfoUSA, there are 214,131 firms that indicated one of these five construction
designations as their primary industry classification. A total of 10,000 firms stratified by employer
size and region within the country were called and asked whether they were in the solar industry
and if they would participate in the survey.
Margin of Error: Survey of unknown solar employers in specific industries.
The overall margin of error for the unknown or random universe of solar employer in wholesale
trade, manufacturing and the construction industry, at the 95 percent level of confidence, is
between +/- 3.79 percent and +/- 6.31 percent (depending on the distribution of each question)
for questions answered by all 235 employers that completed a survey from the universe of 9,263
solar employment locations estimated of unknown employers in wholesale trade, manufacturing
and construction.
It is important to note that questions asked of smaller sub-groups of will have a margin of error
greater than +/-6.31 percent, with the exact margin of error dependent on the number of
respondents within each sub-group as well as the distribution of responses.
Methodology for Utilities Survey
The survey methodology for the Utilities survey was an online or telephone survey census of all
solar utility employers. All solar utility employers identified by Solar Electric Power Association #
(SEPA) were sent an email invitation to complete the survey. Those employers that did not
complete an online survey were called via telephone and asked to participate in a short survey. !
In total, 79 utilities completed a survey, from a total contact list of 149, resulting in a response
rate of over 50 percent.
44
!
46. 5.3 National Secondary Data Analysis
5.3.1 Solar Industry Overview
Accurate and reliable secondary data on solar employment does not yet exist. This is
because solar companies and occupations are included in broad categories with other firms that
are not in the industry. For example, existing classifications combine solar installation
companies with electrical contractors. Therefore, the information based on solar installation in
the secondary data is a better proxy on related industries - including the solar companies within
them - rather than the solar-specific information that we collected in our primary research.14
Despite the limitations, secondary data can provide reliable information on many
traditional sectors, which can help inform the broad clusters that define economic regions and to
compare solar employment with employment rates at other similarly situated firms. It is
critically important to understand that the figures presented in this section do not represent
solar employment, but rather include much broader categories to which we can compare the
specific solar data collected in the primary research. Using classifications developed by
numerous sources, the industries most associated with solar firms are expected to add over
173,000 jobs over the next twelve months and nearly 725,000 jobs over the five year period
ending in 2015, representing an impressive 4% growth over the next year and 16.3% growth rate
over the five-year period. Though most subsectors do appear to show moderate to strong growth
over the next five years, the installation sector is by far the largest and fastest growing of the
subsectors, according to EMSI data.
Our secondary data analysis relies on Economic Modeling Specialists, Inc. (EMSI) analysis
of traditional, solar-related industries (by the North American Industry Classification System, or
NAICS code) and occupations (by Standard Occupational Classification, or SOC) that are drawn
from O*NET’s Greening of the World of Work: Implications for O*NET-SOC and New and
Emerging Occupations, the California Community Colleges Center of Excellence Green Economy
Overview, the Political Economy Research Institute’s Green Recovery Report and original
research from the random sample of employers.
Table 6 illustrates the various NAICS codes that most frequently include solar companies.
46
14 The secondary data collected for this report is limited by the nature of the classification of solar firms. This results in
information that is illustrative for general and broad conclusions but cannot be reasonably relied on to draw specific
conclusions at the level of validity that primary research can provide, because too many non-solar firms are included within
the current classification systems. Therefore, existing data is skewed because it includes many other types of firms that are
not in the solar industry, which may be declining or growing at different rates than their solar counterparts.
!
47. Table 6: Solar NAICS Codes
NAICS Code Description Subsector
236118 Residential Remodelers Installation
238160 Roofing Contractors Installation
238210 Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors Installation
238220 Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors Installation
238190 Other Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors Installation
238990 All Other Specialty Trade Contractors Installation
423610 Electrical Apparatus and Equipment, Wiring Supplies, and Related
Equipment Merchant Wholesalers
Wholesale Trade
423620 Electrical and Electronic Appliance, Television, and Radio Set
Merchant Wholesalers
Wholesale Trade
423720 Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies (Hydronics)
Merchant Wholesalers
Wholesale Trade
333414 Heating Equipment Manufacturing Manufacturing
333611 Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manufacturing Manufacturing
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing Manufacturing
334419 All other Electrical and Component Manufacturing Manufacturing
221119 Other Electric Power Generation Utilities
47
!
48. Figure 38: Secondary Data on Subsectors
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
Reviewing the more specific industries within these broad subsectors, engineering firms,
electrical contractors, and plumbing and HVAC contractors are expected to experience the
greatest growth, along with their related traditional occupations.
Figure 39: Secondary Data - Employment by Traditional Occupations Related to Solar
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
48
!
49. Figure 40: Secondary Data - Employment Growth by Traditional Occupations
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
Regionally, the Southeast is expected to add the most jobs of any area across all solar subsectors
over the next year, followed by the Northeast and Upper Midwest.
Figure 41: Secondary Data - Regional Comparisons by Employment Growth (12 Month)
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
49
!
50. 5.3.2 Installation Data
Existing labor market data for solar installers are limited because firms and occupations
related to those installations tend to be classified in more broadly defined construction industries.
For example, many solar installation firms are classified as electrical contractors (NAICS 238211
and 238212), roofing contractors (NAICS 238161 and 238162), plumbing and HVAC contractors
(NAICS 238221 and 238222), to name a few. Compounding this matter, solar installer
occupations are typically included with electricians (SOC 47-2111), plumbers (SOC 47-2152),
roofers (SOC 47-2181) and other construction-related job titles.
Despite these limitations, analyzing the aggregate information for solar installation-related
industries and occupations can be illustrative, particularly in order to compare the projected
growth and wage information across geographic regions. The data also provide insight into the
overall potential for growth on a national level. Data provided for the selected industries
includes all jobs, not only those directly related to solar.
According to EMSI data, the traditional industries associated with solar are expected to
experience job growth of over 3.75% over the next year - nearly double the anticipated overall
job growth of 2% over the same period but only one-fifth of the 18% anticipated growth reported
by solar installers. Of the industries selected for review, the largest growth is expected from non-
residential plumbing and HVAC contractors (29,039 new jobs) closely followed by non-
residential electrical contractors (22,068 new jobs).
Figure 42: 12 Month Occupational Growth in Traditional Industries Related to Installations
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
50
!
51. Within these industries, the top occupational growth is expected for plumbers, pipefitters,
and steamfitters, followed closely by electricians and HVAC mechanics and installers.
Figure 43: Secondary Data - Top Occupations Within Traditional Industries Related to
Installations
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
From a regional perspective, the Southeast is expected to show the largest growth in
establishments and occupational growth, followed by the Lower Midwest and the Northeast, over
the next 12 months.
51
!
52. Figure 44: Secondary Data - Regional Comparison by Employment
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
52
!
53. 5.3.3 Wholesale Trade
The existing data for wholesale trade firms and occupations in the solar industry are also
categorized with other firms that sell electrical and plumbing supplies. According to existing
literature, solar equipment wholesalers are included in three categories: Electrical Apparatus and
Equipment, Wiring Supplies, and Related Equipment Merchant Wholesalers (423610), Electrical
and Electronic Appliance, Television, and Radio Set Merchant Wholesalers (423620), and
Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies (Hydronics) Merchant Wholesalers (423720).
Over the next year, EMSI data indicate that the wholesale trade industries that include solar
firms expect to add over 2,200 jobs, representing a growth rate of 1%. Nearly 60% of this
growth is expected from Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies (Hydronics) Merchant
Wholesalers, followed closely by Electrical Apparatus and Equipment, Wiring Supplies, and
Related Equipment Merchant Wholesalers.
Figure 45: Secondary Data - Traditional Industries Related to Solar Wholesale Trade
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
53
!
54. Within these industries, sales representatives and customer service representatives are expected
to be top occupations.
Figure 46: Occupational Growth in Traditional Industries Related to Wholesale Trade
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
54
!
55. From a regional perspective, three of the six regions represent the majority of the employment
growth in the selected wholesale trade industries over the coming year, led by the Southeast,
Lower Midwest, and Southwest.
Figure 47: Regional Comparison of Employment in Traditional Industries Related to Trade
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
55
!
56. 5.3.4 Manufacturing
The existing labor market data for solar manufacturing is skewed because the NAICS codes
that are most relevant for solar product manufacturing also include manufacturing for other
products that are facing steep declines. According to existing reports, these NAICS codes include
Heating Equipment (except Warm Air Furnaces) Manufacturing (333414), Semiconductor and
Related Device Manufacturing (334413), and All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing (335999).
Drawing a sharp contrast from the solar-specific manufacturing data gathered in the primary
analysis for this report, EMSI data indicate that the wholesale trade industries that include solar
firms expect to lose over 10,000 jobs over the next year, a net loss of 4.5%. Semiconductor and
Related Device Manufacturing firms are expected to lose nearly 11,000 jobs, Heating Equipment
Manufacturing firms are expected to lose approximately 600 jobs, and Miscellaneous Electrical
Equipment and Component Manufacturing firms are expected to add nearly 1,000 jobs.
Figure 48: Employment in Traditional Industries Related to Solar Manufacturing
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
56
!
57. Assemblers and processors are expected to face the toughest employment prospects over
the next year and beyond.
Figure 49: Employment in Traditional Industries Related to Solar Manufacturing, by Occupation
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
57
!
58. From a regional perspective, the Southeast is the only region expected to experience job
growth in these industries, adding 31 jobs over the year.
Figure 50: Regional Comparison of Employment in Traditional Industries Related to Solar
Manufacturing
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
58
!
59. 5.3.5 Utilities
Existing information on utilities is generally highly reliable, however, as is the case with the
other subsectors studied in this report, solar power generation utilities are categorized with many
other types of power plants. Though transmission, controls, and bulk power distribution all
represent important facets of solar utility information, the classifications are far too broad to draw
reasonable and accurate conclusions from secondary sources. Therefore, for the purpose of this
analysis, the only industry selected for review is Other Electric Power Generation (NAICS
221119), a sector which includes wind, geothermal, and biomass power generation utilities and
firms, among others. Over the next year, EMSI data predict 159 new jobs, or growth of 1%.
Figure 51: 12-Month Growth Rate of “Other” Electric Power Utilities
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
From an occupational standpoint, power plant operators, and first-line supervisors/
managers of production and operating workers are expected to add the most new jobs, closely
followed by electrical and electronics repairers, powerhouse, substation, and relay workers.
59
!
60. Figure 52: 12-Month Growth Rate of Traditional Occupations Related to Utilities
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
60
!
61. From a regional perspective, the Lower Midwest and the Northwest are expected to add the most
jobs in the selected industries.
Figure 53: 12-Month Growth Regional Comparison - Utilities
Source: EMSI Complete Employment, 3rd Quarter 2010
61
!
62. 5.4 State-by-State Data Collection
The following page includes a summary of The Solar Foundation’s independent analysis of state-
level data. This section also includes the raw survey responses, secondary data on each state,
and as a comparison, labor market information on the fossil fuel electric power generation sector.
62
!
63. !"#$%!"&'(%&")'*%+(',-!(.('
#%/'(%&")'(#"#-('
012'3445651738'9636:;8:<:8'4363='>8:39:'<5956'#?:'(1832'01@7436517A9'B:C956:'36D'!!!"#$%&'()*+',-.)/0'-"'*1"'
The Solar Foundation conducted an independent analysis of state-level data that were collected by
employers as part of the National Solar Jobs Census 2010. This information is important because it
provides a way to measure the effectiveness of certain state-driven policies. Because this census is
national in scope, state-level data is limited due to geographically-diverse response rates and
unrepresentative samples. By reviewing the national data and individual state responses, however, it is
possible to generate approximate employment data on a state-by-state basis. Please note that certain
states with low number of solar firms may be ranked highly because those firms are larger manufacturers,
rather than smaller installer firms. Based on this analysis, the top 10 states for solar jobs are:
Rank State Survey Responses1
Estimated Solar Jobs Estimated Solar Firms2
1 California 17,352 36,000 1,072
2 Pennsylvania 3,193 6,700 282
3 Texas 3,068 6,400 170
4 Michigan 3,023 6,300 76
5 Wisconsin 2,885 6,000 89
6 Colorado 2,528 5,300 254
7 Georgia 2,157 4,500 62
8 Arizona 1,815 3,800 230
9 New York 1,654 3,500 225
10 Indiana 1,628 3,400 25
Estimated Jobs in Top 20 States as Percent of Total Solar Jobs
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
3
2#$%4%2501,*%420-6(,.%2/$%2/'/)(2-,78%*2'529'842)/2)((24'()*250*7420-2%)6$24/)/%:2)420-.06)/%.28;2/$%24,*<%;2*%4='-4%4"2
>
2+'*27'*%20-5'*7)/0'-2'-24'()*26'7=)-0%420-2%)6$24/)/%:2<040/?2!!!"4'()*!'*@45'*)7%*06)"6'7"22
64. 5.4.1 Alabama
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 4,101 4,165 64 2% 42
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
64
65. 5.4.2 Alaska
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 396 372 -24 -6% 27
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
65
66. 5.4.3 Arizona
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 104 4% 1,815 2,105 16%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 5,489 5,479 -10 0% 15
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
66
67. 5.4.4 Arkansas
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 165 135 -30 -18% 3
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
67
68. 5.4.5 California
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 698 29% 17,352 21,804 26%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 13,845 14,055 210 2% 228
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
68
69. 5.4.6 Colorado
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 155 6% 2,582 3,172 23%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 492 481 -11 -2% 13
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
69
70. 5.4.7 Connecticut
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 32 1% 199 247 24%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 253 199 -54 -21% 9
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
70
71. 5.4.8 Delaware
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 11 <1% 175 208 19%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 92 75 -17 -18% 5
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
71
72. 5.4.9 District of Columbia
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 12 <1% 608 634 4%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 29 22 -7 -24% 5
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
73
73. 5.4.10 Florida
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 94 4% 1,416 1,680 19%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 4,969 4,318 -651 -13% 71
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
75
74. 5.4.11 Georgia
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 34 1% 2,157 2,913 35%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010 (Not Enough Jobs in Region)
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
76
75. 5.4.12 Hawaii
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 29 1% 426 555 30%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 2,589 2,623 34 1% 20
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
77
76. 5.4.13 Idaho
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 16 <1% 84 106 26%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
78
77. 5.4.14 Illinois
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 35 1% 533 692 30%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 2,497 2,267 -230 -9% 46
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
80
78. 5.4.15 Indiana
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 14 <1% 1,628 1,837 13%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 6,506 6,125 -381 -6% 103
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
81
79. 5.4.16 Iowa
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 11 <1% 39 54 39%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 2,967 3,003 36 1% 137
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
83
80. 5.4.17 Kansas
Primary Data
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 155 113 -42 -27% 5
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
84
81. 5.4.18 Kentucky
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 10 <1% 266 313 18%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 1,695 1,652 -43 -3% 30
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
85
82. 5.4.19 Louisiana
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 38 2% 225 371 65%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 1,216 1,202 -14 -1% 26
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
87
83. 5.4.20 Maine
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 17 <1% 216 282 31%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 86 69 -17 -20% 5
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
88
84. 5.4.21 Maryland
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 41 2% 867 1,094 26%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 2,032 2,133 101 5% 9
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
90
85. 5.4.22 Massachusetts
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 57 2% 796 975 23%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 2,627 2,170 -457 -17% 74
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
91
86. 5.4.23 Michigan
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 41 2% 3,023 3,453 14%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 11,408 11,119 -289 -3% 108
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
92
87. 5.4.24 Minnesota
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 37 2% 1,193 1,121 (6)%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 820 725 -95 -12% 28
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
93
88. 5.4.25 Mississippi
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 1,473 1,440 -33 -2% 52
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
94
89. 5.4.26 Missouri
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 16 <1% 72 138 92%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 1,999 1,993 -6 0% 27
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
95
90. 5.4.27 Montana
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 24 1% 467 485 4%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 475 381 -94 -20% 8
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
97
91. 5.4.28 Nebraska
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 15 16 1 7% 1
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
99
92. 5.4.29 Nevada
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 40 2% 747 1,427 91%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 562 513 -49 -9% 16
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
100
93. 5.4.30 New Hampshire
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 17 <1% 58 70 21%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 359 353 -6 -2% 10
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
101
94. 5.4.31 New Jersey
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 67 3% 1,475 1,875 27%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 1,120 1,109 -11 -1% 24
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
103
95. 5.4.32 New Mexico
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 50 2% 788 1,027 30%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 686 683 -3 0% 14
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
104
96. 5.4.33 New York
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 86 4% 1,654 1,977 20%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 25,903 24,917 -986 -4% 214
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
105
97. 5.4.34 North Carolina
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 57 2% 1,033 1,419 37%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 1,767 1,569 -198 -11% 38
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
106
98. 5.4.35 North Dakota
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 853 839 -14 -2% 9
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
107
99. 5.4.36 Ohio
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 24 1% 1,088 1,153 6%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
*Due to small sample size, these data should be used to draw general conclusions about the state’s solar
workforce.
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 5,053 4,881 -172 -3% 76
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
108
100. 5.4.37 Oklahoma
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 3,171 3,135 -36 -1% 60
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
110
101. 5.4.38 Oregon
Primary Data
Description Responses (n) % of Total 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs % Change
State Total 81 3% 872 1,101 26%
National Total 2,426 n/a 57,197 67,889 19%
Secondary Data
For comparison purposes, the following table represents the number of jobs in the fossil fuel
electric power generation sector.
Description 2010 Jobs 2011 Jobs Change % Change 2009
Establishments
State Total 230 180 -50 -22% 7
National Total 135,458 131,352 -4,106 -3% 2,035
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
This section includes data on traditional occupations related to the solar industry to compare
relative size (2010 jobs) and earnings of workers in each sector.
Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 3rd Quarter 2010
111