SlideShare a Scribd company logo
TABLE-1: Sector wise parameters were tested using Multinomial and Runs test.
PARAMETER
RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN
C.V. T.V. (5%) T.V. (1%) C.V. T.V. (5%) T.V. (1%) C.V. T.V. (5%) T.V. (1%)
MULTINOMIAL TEST
TYPE OF ENTERPRISE 4.444 3.841 6.635 1.835 3.841 6.635 0.739 3.841 6.635
TYPE OF WORKER 65.09 7.815 11.345 300.86 7.815 11.345 348.003 7.815 11.345
BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE 0.171 7.815 11.345 5.021 7.815 11.345 4.527 7.815 11.345
RUNS TEST
GVA 496 363.558 354.844 10575 8069.108 8029.115 10875 8455.364 8414.435
C.V. – Calculated Value T.V. – Tabulated Value
Conclusion after comparing the calculated and tabulated values
PARAMETERS
DECISION
RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN
5% 1% 5% 1% 5% 1%
MULTINOMIAL TEST
TYPE OF
ENTERPRISE
REJECT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT
TYPE OF WORKER REJECT REJECT REJECT REJECT REJECT REJECT
BROAD ACTIVITY
TYPE
ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT
RUNS TEST
GVA ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT
TABLE-2: Sector wise parameters were estimated for State & Central Samples separately.
TYPE OF ENTERPRISE
STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.)
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
OAE 17632 634133 651765 19741 599638 649337 19726 630299 651390 18687 616885 635572
ESTABLISHMENT 6960 495361 502321 8022 496690 504712 7563 495365 502326 7491 496026 503517
ALL 24593 1129494 1154086 27763 1096328 1124092 27626 1128503 1153521 26178 1112911 1139089
3
Method of Inverse Variance Method of Weighted Average
Pie Chart indicating the share of different categories of Enterprises.
BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE
STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.)
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
MANUFACTURING 4607 237320 241927 5731 195983 201714 5646 236676 241781 5169 216651 221820
TRADING 10041 459181 469222 12822 495713 508535 10996 460508 470348 11432 477447 488878
OTHER SERVICES 9827 420890 430717 9362 380141 388113 9386 419968 428734 9594 400516 410110
ALL 24475 1117390 1141866 27915 1071837 1098362 26028 1117152 1140863 26195 1094614 1120809
Method of Inverse Variance Method of Weighted Average
Pie Chart indicating the share of different categories of Broad Activities.
Method of Inverse Variance Method of Weighted Average
Pie Chart indicating the division of Gross Value Added between Rural & Urban Enterprises.
G.V.A STATE CENTER POOLED(I.V.) POOLED (W.A.)
RURAL 525840612 1004325354 719898322 765082983
URBAN 37625533141 29435716862 36990267134 33530625002
RURAL+ URBAN 38151373750 30440042217 37510418687 34295707983
TABLE-3: Sector wise relative standard error (RSE) for key parameters
TYPE OF ENTERPRISE
STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.)
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
OAE 35.720 4.751 3.656 2.709 14.210 8.591 2.701 4.507 3.364 16.913 7.325 4.662
ESTABLISHMENT 17.550 1.342 1.080 13.298 25.034 24.847 10.625 1.340 1.079 10.825 12.552 12.465
ALL 30.577 3.256 2.535 5.771 19.114 18.784 5.673 3.210 2.512 14.685 9.558 9.357
BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE
STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.)
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
MANUFACTURING 19.663 0.720 0.332 4.523 6.938 6.612 4.414 0.717 0.332 9.115 3.163 3.012
TRADING 19.616 4.590 4.072 21.241 21.895 21.878 14.514 4.493 4.003 14.701 11.579 11.546
OTHER SERVICES 46.198 3.028 4.508 11.324 22.036 21.668 10.999 3.000 4.414 24.295 10.578 10.674
G.V.A STATE CENTER POOLED(I.V.) POOLED (W.A.)
RURAL 28.937 18.342 16.296 15.615
URBAN 6.712 29.585 6.557 13.521
RURAL + URBAN 7.018 29.214 6.835 13.540
TABLE-4: Sector wise divergence for key parameters
TYPE OF ENTERPRISE
O.A.E. ESTABLISHMENT ALL
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
DIVERGENCE 2109.15 34494.43 2427.59 1061.37 1329.36 2390.73 3170.53 33165.07 29994.55
r2 35.72 4.75 3.66 17.55 1.34 1.08 30.58 3.26 2.53
r1 2.71 14.21 8.59 13.30 25.03 24.85 5.77 19.11 18.78
r0 2.70 4.51 3.36 10.62 1.34 1.08 5.67 3.21 2.51
RESULT
Examination
required
Acceptable
Acceptable Examination
required
Acceptable
Acceptable
Examination
required
Acceptable Acceptable
BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE
MANUFACTURING TRADING OTHER SERVICES
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
RURAL URBAN
RURAL +
URBAN
DIVERGENCE 1123.501 41336.519 40213.018 2781.242 36532.029 39313.271 464.804 40748.873 42603.620
r2 19.663 0.720 0.332 19.616 4.590 4.072 46.198 3.028 4.390
r1 4.523 6.938 6.612 21.241 21.895 21.878 11.324 22.036 21.591
r0 4.414 0.717 0.332 14.514 4.493 4.003 10.999 3.000 4.303
RESULT
Examination
required
Examination
required
Examination
required
Examination
required
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Examination
required
Examination
required
G.V.A DIVERGENCE(d) r2 r1 r0 RESULT
RURAL 478484742 28.937023 18.342289 16.29626945 Examination required
URBAN 8189816279 6.7117754 29.585026 6.556919322 Examination required
RURAL+ URBAN 7711331533 7.0181061 29.214089 6.834941211 Examination required

More Related Content

Similar to FINAL TABLES_project_67

Siam sales report - march 2021
Siam sales report -  march 2021Siam sales report -  march 2021
Siam sales report - march 2021
RushLane
 
Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'
Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'
Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'
IndiaNotes.com
 
Presentation on Applications of Statistical Techniques
Presentation on Applications of Statistical TechniquesPresentation on Applications of Statistical Techniques
Presentation on Applications of Statistical Techniques
Mohammad Istiaq Hasan
 
10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnan
10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnan10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnan
10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnanKarmveer Singh
 
120981064 new-doll
120981064 new-doll120981064 new-doll
120981064 new-doll
Faheem Mukhtar
 
Sheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docx
Sheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docxSheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docx
Sheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docx
maoanderton
 
Grdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund Allocation
Grdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund AllocationGrdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund Allocation
Grdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund Allocation
Hilario Martinez
 
Financial analysis of tata motors
Financial analysis of tata motorsFinancial analysis of tata motors
Financial analysis of tata motors
CA Ajay Biwal
 
1Q16 Conference Call
1Q16 Conference Call1Q16 Conference Call
1Q16 Conference Call
Localiza
 
Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)
Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)
Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)
Localiza
 
Greek International Trade
Greek International TradeGreek International Trade
Greek International Trade
Rodney Jetton
 
2016 ULI Hines Student Competition Pro Forma_v11
2016 ULI Hines Student Competition  Pro Forma_v112016 ULI Hines Student Competition  Pro Forma_v11
2016 ULI Hines Student Competition Pro Forma_v11Miguel A. Garcia
 
Excel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas Firm
Excel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas FirmExcel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas Firm
Excel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas Firm
Flevy.com Best Practices
 
2Q16 Conference Call
2Q16 Conference Call2Q16 Conference Call
2Q16 Conference Call
Localiza
 
anexos.pdf
anexos.pdfanexos.pdf
anexos.pdf
ElizaVianeyEscobar
 
Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015
Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015
Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015
AQUILA Commercial
 
Fixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Fixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation SlidesFixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Fixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
SlideTeam
 
3Q14 Results Presentation
3Q14 Results Presentation3Q14 Results Presentation
3Q14 Results Presentation
TegmaRI
 

Similar to FINAL TABLES_project_67 (20)

FM Case study all
FM Case study all FM Case study all
FM Case study all
 
Siam sales report - march 2021
Siam sales report -  march 2021Siam sales report -  march 2021
Siam sales report - march 2021
 
Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'
Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'
Voltas Q4FY15: Firstcall recommend 'Buy'
 
Presentation on Applications of Statistical Techniques
Presentation on Applications of Statistical TechniquesPresentation on Applications of Statistical Techniques
Presentation on Applications of Statistical Techniques
 
10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnan
10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnan10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnan
10 yrs competitive analysis of lg balakrishnan
 
120981064 new-doll
120981064 new-doll120981064 new-doll
120981064 new-doll
 
Sheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docx
Sheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docxSheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docx
Sheet1EgyptGDP by Expenditure2005 US $assumptionsYearYCGIXMconsump.docx
 
Grdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund Allocation
Grdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund AllocationGrdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund Allocation
Grdp-based 20-80 Ratio in Fund Allocation
 
Financial analysis of tata motors
Financial analysis of tata motorsFinancial analysis of tata motors
Financial analysis of tata motors
 
1Q16 Conference Call
1Q16 Conference Call1Q16 Conference Call
1Q16 Conference Call
 
Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)
Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)
Webcast 1 q16 ing(1)
 
Sample Financial Reports
Sample Financial ReportsSample Financial Reports
Sample Financial Reports
 
Greek International Trade
Greek International TradeGreek International Trade
Greek International Trade
 
2016 ULI Hines Student Competition Pro Forma_v11
2016 ULI Hines Student Competition  Pro Forma_v112016 ULI Hines Student Competition  Pro Forma_v11
2016 ULI Hines Student Competition Pro Forma_v11
 
Excel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas Firm
Excel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas FirmExcel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas Firm
Excel Model for Valuation of Natural Gas Firm
 
2Q16 Conference Call
2Q16 Conference Call2Q16 Conference Call
2Q16 Conference Call
 
anexos.pdf
anexos.pdfanexos.pdf
anexos.pdf
 
Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015
Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015
Austin Industrial Overview | 4Q 2015
 
Fixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Fixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation SlidesFixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Fixed Capital Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
3Q14 Results Presentation
3Q14 Results Presentation3Q14 Results Presentation
3Q14 Results Presentation
 

FINAL TABLES_project_67

  • 1. TABLE-1: Sector wise parameters were tested using Multinomial and Runs test. PARAMETER RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN C.V. T.V. (5%) T.V. (1%) C.V. T.V. (5%) T.V. (1%) C.V. T.V. (5%) T.V. (1%) MULTINOMIAL TEST TYPE OF ENTERPRISE 4.444 3.841 6.635 1.835 3.841 6.635 0.739 3.841 6.635 TYPE OF WORKER 65.09 7.815 11.345 300.86 7.815 11.345 348.003 7.815 11.345 BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE 0.171 7.815 11.345 5.021 7.815 11.345 4.527 7.815 11.345 RUNS TEST GVA 496 363.558 354.844 10575 8069.108 8029.115 10875 8455.364 8414.435 C.V. – Calculated Value T.V. – Tabulated Value Conclusion after comparing the calculated and tabulated values PARAMETERS DECISION RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN 5% 1% 5% 1% 5% 1% MULTINOMIAL TEST TYPE OF ENTERPRISE REJECT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT TYPE OF WORKER REJECT REJECT REJECT REJECT REJECT REJECT BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT RUNS TEST GVA ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT
  • 2. TABLE-2: Sector wise parameters were estimated for State & Central Samples separately. TYPE OF ENTERPRISE STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.) RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN OAE 17632 634133 651765 19741 599638 649337 19726 630299 651390 18687 616885 635572 ESTABLISHMENT 6960 495361 502321 8022 496690 504712 7563 495365 502326 7491 496026 503517 ALL 24593 1129494 1154086 27763 1096328 1124092 27626 1128503 1153521 26178 1112911 1139089 3 Method of Inverse Variance Method of Weighted Average Pie Chart indicating the share of different categories of Enterprises.
  • 3. BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.) RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN MANUFACTURING 4607 237320 241927 5731 195983 201714 5646 236676 241781 5169 216651 221820 TRADING 10041 459181 469222 12822 495713 508535 10996 460508 470348 11432 477447 488878 OTHER SERVICES 9827 420890 430717 9362 380141 388113 9386 419968 428734 9594 400516 410110 ALL 24475 1117390 1141866 27915 1071837 1098362 26028 1117152 1140863 26195 1094614 1120809 Method of Inverse Variance Method of Weighted Average Pie Chart indicating the share of different categories of Broad Activities.
  • 4. Method of Inverse Variance Method of Weighted Average Pie Chart indicating the division of Gross Value Added between Rural & Urban Enterprises. G.V.A STATE CENTER POOLED(I.V.) POOLED (W.A.) RURAL 525840612 1004325354 719898322 765082983 URBAN 37625533141 29435716862 36990267134 33530625002 RURAL+ URBAN 38151373750 30440042217 37510418687 34295707983
  • 5. TABLE-3: Sector wise relative standard error (RSE) for key parameters TYPE OF ENTERPRISE STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.) RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN OAE 35.720 4.751 3.656 2.709 14.210 8.591 2.701 4.507 3.364 16.913 7.325 4.662 ESTABLISHMENT 17.550 1.342 1.080 13.298 25.034 24.847 10.625 1.340 1.079 10.825 12.552 12.465 ALL 30.577 3.256 2.535 5.771 19.114 18.784 5.673 3.210 2.512 14.685 9.558 9.357
  • 6. BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE STATE CENTER POOLED (I.V.) POOLED (W.A.) RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN MANUFACTURING 19.663 0.720 0.332 4.523 6.938 6.612 4.414 0.717 0.332 9.115 3.163 3.012 TRADING 19.616 4.590 4.072 21.241 21.895 21.878 14.514 4.493 4.003 14.701 11.579 11.546 OTHER SERVICES 46.198 3.028 4.508 11.324 22.036 21.668 10.999 3.000 4.414 24.295 10.578 10.674
  • 7. G.V.A STATE CENTER POOLED(I.V.) POOLED (W.A.) RURAL 28.937 18.342 16.296 15.615 URBAN 6.712 29.585 6.557 13.521 RURAL + URBAN 7.018 29.214 6.835 13.540
  • 8. TABLE-4: Sector wise divergence for key parameters TYPE OF ENTERPRISE O.A.E. ESTABLISHMENT ALL RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN DIVERGENCE 2109.15 34494.43 2427.59 1061.37 1329.36 2390.73 3170.53 33165.07 29994.55 r2 35.72 4.75 3.66 17.55 1.34 1.08 30.58 3.26 2.53 r1 2.71 14.21 8.59 13.30 25.03 24.85 5.77 19.11 18.78 r0 2.70 4.51 3.36 10.62 1.34 1.08 5.67 3.21 2.51 RESULT Examination required Acceptable Acceptable Examination required Acceptable Acceptable Examination required Acceptable Acceptable BROAD ACTIVITY TYPE MANUFACTURING TRADING OTHER SERVICES RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL + URBAN DIVERGENCE 1123.501 41336.519 40213.018 2781.242 36532.029 39313.271 464.804 40748.873 42603.620 r2 19.663 0.720 0.332 19.616 4.590 4.072 46.198 3.028 4.390 r1 4.523 6.938 6.612 21.241 21.895 21.878 11.324 22.036 21.591 r0 4.414 0.717 0.332 14.514 4.493 4.003 10.999 3.000 4.303 RESULT Examination required Examination required Examination required Examination required Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Examination required Examination required
  • 9. G.V.A DIVERGENCE(d) r2 r1 r0 RESULT RURAL 478484742 28.937023 18.342289 16.29626945 Examination required URBAN 8189816279 6.7117754 29.585026 6.556919322 Examination required RURAL+ URBAN 7711331533 7.0181061 29.214089 6.834941211 Examination required