The First Amendment protects free speech. Yet the U.S. Supreme Court says some kinds of speech are unprotected. This slide presentation addresses three kinds: fighting words, incitement to imminent lawless action, and true threats against individuals or groups of individuals.
Free Press, Fair Trial: When Constitutional Rights Come into ConflictDan Kennedy
To accompany lecture on Sheppard v. Maxwell, Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, and related cases on the clash between First and Sixth Amendment rights.
This document discusses the legal definitions and history of obscenity, indecency, and profanity in media in the United States. It outlines key Supreme Court cases that have established and refined the definitions of obscenity and indecency, and delineated what types of sexual or profane content are protected by the First Amendment versus what can be restricted by the government. It also discusses how these restrictions have been applied differently to different media such as broadcasting, cable, mail, and zoning laws regarding adult businesses.
The document discusses obscenity and indecency laws as they relate to broadcasting in the United States. It defines obscenity and indecency, outlines the three-pronged test used by the Supreme Court to determine if something is obscene, and explains that indecent content is protected by the First Amendment but can be restricted when children may be in the audience. It also describes the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as being responsible for enforcing these laws through investigating complaints and issuing fines.
This document discusses police deviance and corruption. It defines police deviance as any activities inconsistent with norms or ethics, including two main types: occupational deviance involving criminal/noncriminal acts during work, and abuse of authority violating the public's trust. The document then lists examples of police duties and various forms of police misconduct like corruption, brutality, lying, theft, and substance abuse. It provides details on types of police misconduct such as false arrests, fake evidence, leaking confidential information, and perjury. Finally, it discusses causes of police deviance and the need for police administrators to set clear expectations, develop an ethical culture, and hold officers and supervisors accountable.
An insight on Specific Offences under Indian Penal Code 1860. A detail presentation on specific offences with criminal Amendment Act 2013 has been included under this slide. Offences against women, children have also been discussed at length.
This document defines defamation as the publication or broadcast of a false statement of fact that seriously harms someone's reputation. It applies to both printed and spoken statements made online or offline. The document notes that truth is an absolute defense against defamation, but proving a statement is true can be difficult. It also explains that statements of opinion alone cannot be defamatory, and discusses some of the challenges around legislating cyberbullying and internet trolling. The document provides examples of statements that could be considered defamatory and discusses the standards of fault required in defamation cases involving public figures.
This document provides an overview of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution which guarantees certain fundamental rights regarding freedom of speech, expression, assembly, movement, residence, and profession to citizens of India. It discusses these rights and the reasonable restrictions that can be imposed on them under Article 19(2) for purposes like security of the state, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, and incitement to offense. It also summarizes key cases like Express Newspapers that have established the importance of freedom of press in a democracy. Overall, the document concisely summarizes the key aspects of Article 19 rights and restrictions in India according to the Indian Constitution and judicial precedents.
This document provides an overview of defamation laws in India. It outlines what constitutes defamation according to Indian law, the basic elements needed for a defamation case, exceptions, and differences between civil and criminal defamation. Specifically, it notes that defamation involves imputations that harm someone's reputation, the person must be identified, and the statement must be published. Defenses include statements that are truthful or opinions on public figures. Defamation can result in civil lawsuits seeking damages or criminal charges with possible imprisonment.
Free Press, Fair Trial: When Constitutional Rights Come into ConflictDan Kennedy
To accompany lecture on Sheppard v. Maxwell, Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, and related cases on the clash between First and Sixth Amendment rights.
This document discusses the legal definitions and history of obscenity, indecency, and profanity in media in the United States. It outlines key Supreme Court cases that have established and refined the definitions of obscenity and indecency, and delineated what types of sexual or profane content are protected by the First Amendment versus what can be restricted by the government. It also discusses how these restrictions have been applied differently to different media such as broadcasting, cable, mail, and zoning laws regarding adult businesses.
The document discusses obscenity and indecency laws as they relate to broadcasting in the United States. It defines obscenity and indecency, outlines the three-pronged test used by the Supreme Court to determine if something is obscene, and explains that indecent content is protected by the First Amendment but can be restricted when children may be in the audience. It also describes the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as being responsible for enforcing these laws through investigating complaints and issuing fines.
This document discusses police deviance and corruption. It defines police deviance as any activities inconsistent with norms or ethics, including two main types: occupational deviance involving criminal/noncriminal acts during work, and abuse of authority violating the public's trust. The document then lists examples of police duties and various forms of police misconduct like corruption, brutality, lying, theft, and substance abuse. It provides details on types of police misconduct such as false arrests, fake evidence, leaking confidential information, and perjury. Finally, it discusses causes of police deviance and the need for police administrators to set clear expectations, develop an ethical culture, and hold officers and supervisors accountable.
An insight on Specific Offences under Indian Penal Code 1860. A detail presentation on specific offences with criminal Amendment Act 2013 has been included under this slide. Offences against women, children have also been discussed at length.
This document defines defamation as the publication or broadcast of a false statement of fact that seriously harms someone's reputation. It applies to both printed and spoken statements made online or offline. The document notes that truth is an absolute defense against defamation, but proving a statement is true can be difficult. It also explains that statements of opinion alone cannot be defamatory, and discusses some of the challenges around legislating cyberbullying and internet trolling. The document provides examples of statements that could be considered defamatory and discusses the standards of fault required in defamation cases involving public figures.
This document provides an overview of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution which guarantees certain fundamental rights regarding freedom of speech, expression, assembly, movement, residence, and profession to citizens of India. It discusses these rights and the reasonable restrictions that can be imposed on them under Article 19(2) for purposes like security of the state, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, and incitement to offense. It also summarizes key cases like Express Newspapers that have established the importance of freedom of press in a democracy. Overall, the document concisely summarizes the key aspects of Article 19 rights and restrictions in India according to the Indian Constitution and judicial precedents.
This document provides an overview of defamation laws in India. It outlines what constitutes defamation according to Indian law, the basic elements needed for a defamation case, exceptions, and differences between civil and criminal defamation. Specifically, it notes that defamation involves imputations that harm someone's reputation, the person must be identified, and the statement must be published. Defenses include statements that are truthful or opinions on public figures. Defamation can result in civil lawsuits seeking damages or criminal charges with possible imprisonment.
Police deviance restraint and third degree methodsNeepa Jani Vyas
This document discusses police deviance and the legal mechanisms in place in India to provide remedies for violations of constitutional rights by police. It outlines two main remedial mechanisms - court-based judicial remedies that citizens can pursue, as well as internal disciplinary authorities. It also discusses laws and Supreme Court cases that have found custodial torture, third-degree interrogation techniques, and excessive use of force to be unconstitutional. The document aims to analyze restraints on police powers and how citizens can seek remedy for police deviance in India.
This document discusses criminal defamation under Indian law. It defines defamation and explains that in India, defamation can be both a civil and criminal offense. Under the Indian Penal Code, a person found guilty of criminal defamation can be sentenced to up to two years in jail. Some common defenses against defamation claims include proving the statement was true, that it was a privileged communication, or constituted fair comment. The document also discusses a Supreme Court case involving the actor Shah Rukh Khan regarding alleged defamatory dialogue in one of his films.
Film censorship in India is governed by the Cinematograph Act of 1952 which allows the government to suppress films that are against national interests or involve defamation, obscenity, or contempt of court. The Central Board of Film Certification previews films and decides whether they can be publicly exhibited, sometimes requiring cuts. While the Supreme Court has upheld film censorship, there is a lack of transparency in the process and censorship is sometimes used to prohibit films that portray controversial societal issues or criticize those in power.
The document discusses the legal concept of mens rea, or guilty mind, which is required for criminal liability. It covers several key aspects of mens rea, including:
- Intention, which can be direct (foreseeing and intending the consequences) or oblique (intending one consequence but foreseeing and being liable for another).
- The development of the test for determining oblique intent and liability for unintended consequences over several cases, culminating in the "virtual certainty" test in R v Woollin.
- Types of mens rea like intention and how scenarios can illustrate direct versus oblique intent.
This document discusses different types of deviances in society, including official deviance by bureaucrats, judges, and legislators; professional deviance by lawyers, teachers, doctors, and journalists; police deviance; landlord deviance; deviance in the electoral process; gender-based aggression; and trade union deviance. It provides examples for each type, such as bureaucrats accepting bribes, judges being influenced by money or politics, legislators exchanging favors for donations, and doctors performing unnecessary procedures for profit.
Este documento describe los delitos relacionados con la pornografía infantil según la ley peruana. Explica conceptos como pornografía infantil, pedofilia y pederastia. También analiza los bienes jurídicos protegidos por la ley como la dignidad y libertad sexual de los menores. Finalmente, describe los diferentes comportamientos típicos considerados delitos como la fabricación, promoción, distribución y posesión de material pornográfico infantil.
Detailed Presentation on Defamation Law in India
Made By:
Edited By: Ayush Patria, Sangam University, Bhilwara
Follow us on Instagram: @law_laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
The document discusses organized crime during the 1920s-1930s prohibition era in the United States. It describes how gangs formed to aid the illegal bootlegging of alcohol, with prominent gang leaders including Al Capone and Charles Luciano. It then examines several films that portrayed organized crime from this era, including Scarface (1932), which was loosely based on Al Capone's rise to power in Chicago during prohibition. Bonnie and Clyde is also discussed, noting how their criminal activities gained some public support due to the economic hardships of the Great Depression. Brief biographies are provided of several notorious gangsters from the period, including John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, and Baby Face Nelson.
The Digital Security Act 2018 in Bangladesh aims to curb crimes committed digitally such as spreading fake news, slander, and inciting violence. However, critics argue it could undermine media freedom and freedom of expression that are protected by the country's constitution and laws. The act allows the government to monitor digital platforms and restrict content it deems harmful or offensive. International organizations have called for reforming the laws to prevent overreach and protect civil liberties.
This document appears to be a student project report submitted to Indore Institute of Law. It includes sections typical of a research project such as an acknowledgements section thanking those who provided guidance, a declaration affirming the work as the student's own, and an introduction outlining the topic of a fair trial as protected by the Indian Constitution and international agreements. The body of the document discusses concepts such as the presumption of innocence, rights to counsel, speedy trial, and others that comprise the right to a fair trial under Indian law and international human rights law.
The document discusses India's Communication Convergence Bill from 2001. The bill aimed to establish a regulatory commission called the Communications Commission of India to regulate the growing convergence of telecom, broadcasting, and multimedia industries. It proposed five categories of licenses and sought to repeal five existing laws regulating telecom and broadcasting. While the bill did not fully materialize, it helped legalize some internet telephony and brought reforms to cable television regulation. New developments like TRAI's unified licensing regime point to ongoing evolution of India's convergence policies.
The Official Secrets Act 1923 is India's anti-espionage act. According to the act, actions which involve helping an enemy state against India are strongly condemned.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Constitution of India. It describes how the constitution establishes India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic that aims to secure justice, liberty, equality and fraternity for all citizens. Some key points covered include:
- It was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on November 26, 1949 and came into effect on January 26, 1950.
- It is the longest written constitution in the world, currently having a preamble, 25 parts, 12 schedules, 5 appendices and 448 articles.
- It guarantees fundamental rights to citizens under Part III, including right to freedom under Article 19 which covers freedom of speech, assembly, movement etc. subject to reasonable restrictions.
Adversarial and inquisitorial systems of justice have blurred distinctions, but key differences remain. In adversarial systems, parties are responsible for evidence and trials determine truth, while inquisitorial systems have faith in pre-trial processes and greater presumption of guilt. Adversarial systems allow prosecutorial discretion and guilty pleas to avoid trial, whereas inquisitorial systems limit discretion and continue trial processes regardless of accused's wishes. The nature of trials also differs, with adversarial trials having parties call witnesses and cross-examine, while inquisitorial trials are judge-led with fewer evidentiary rules. Victims also have a more recognized role in inquisitorial pre-trial investigations and trials.
BlBased
Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution of India states that, “all citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression”. The philosophy behind this Article lies in the Preamble of the Constitution, where a solemn resolve is made to secure to all its citizen, liberty of thought and expression. The exercise of this right is, however, subject to “reasonable restrictions” for certain purposes being imposed under Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India.
This document discusses public order crimes and offenses against public tranquility from various perspectives. It defines public order crimes as violations that interfere with normal societal operations and go against shared social values, even if they do not have an identifiable victim. It notes that public order is derived from the concept of "order publique" and aims to maintain more than just ordinary law and order. Additionally, it discusses approaches like broken windows theory and collective efficacy that aim to promote public order and prevent more serious crimes by cracking down on minor offenses.
The document discusses several schools of criminology including the cartographic school. The cartographic school used maps and statistics to study the relationship between crime and environmental/social factors. It examined crime patterns in different areas and time periods. This school introduced early spatial analyses of crime and how geography influences criminal behavior. It influenced the development of modern crime mapping techniques used by law enforcement.
Defamation involves making a false statement about someone that lowers their reputation or esteems them. It can be a civil or criminal offense. Criminal defamation is defined in the Criminal Code and involves intentionally publishing defamatory statements to harm someone's reputation. Defamation laws aim to protect people's reputations from injurious statements. Libel refers to defamatory statements that are written or published while slander involves spoken defamatory statements. There are defenses to defamation claims including proving the statement was true or a fair comment. Remedies for defamation include damages, injunctions, or requiring a retraction, correction, or apology be published.
This document summarizes criminal offenses against persons, including definitions, elements, and statutes regarding assault, battery, stalking, hazing, reckless endangerment, rape, and sexual battery. It discusses the evolution of laws from common law to modern statutes. For example, it notes that all states now define stalking as a crime and that legislative reforms have expanded definitions of rape to be gender-neutral and include other forms of nonconsensual penetration.
Charles Schenck was convicted under the Espionage Act for mailing leaflets urging resistance to the draft during WWI. He appealed to the Supreme Court claiming a First Amendment violation. The Court affirmed the conviction, with Justice Holmes introducing the "clear and present danger" test to determine if speech is not protected when it poses a substantive danger that Congress can prevent.
Thank you for your letter regarding the impact of Brown v. Board of Education. The unanimous decision declaring segregation unconstitutional was a landmark victory for civil rights and equality. While discrimination still exists, this ruling helped establish that all people deserve equal treatment and opportunities under the law regardless of race. Progress continues to be made towards the vision of a just society where individuals are judged based on their character rather than the color of their skin. The ACLU remains committed to defending civil liberties and promoting racial justice.
Police deviance restraint and third degree methodsNeepa Jani Vyas
This document discusses police deviance and the legal mechanisms in place in India to provide remedies for violations of constitutional rights by police. It outlines two main remedial mechanisms - court-based judicial remedies that citizens can pursue, as well as internal disciplinary authorities. It also discusses laws and Supreme Court cases that have found custodial torture, third-degree interrogation techniques, and excessive use of force to be unconstitutional. The document aims to analyze restraints on police powers and how citizens can seek remedy for police deviance in India.
This document discusses criminal defamation under Indian law. It defines defamation and explains that in India, defamation can be both a civil and criminal offense. Under the Indian Penal Code, a person found guilty of criminal defamation can be sentenced to up to two years in jail. Some common defenses against defamation claims include proving the statement was true, that it was a privileged communication, or constituted fair comment. The document also discusses a Supreme Court case involving the actor Shah Rukh Khan regarding alleged defamatory dialogue in one of his films.
Film censorship in India is governed by the Cinematograph Act of 1952 which allows the government to suppress films that are against national interests or involve defamation, obscenity, or contempt of court. The Central Board of Film Certification previews films and decides whether they can be publicly exhibited, sometimes requiring cuts. While the Supreme Court has upheld film censorship, there is a lack of transparency in the process and censorship is sometimes used to prohibit films that portray controversial societal issues or criticize those in power.
The document discusses the legal concept of mens rea, or guilty mind, which is required for criminal liability. It covers several key aspects of mens rea, including:
- Intention, which can be direct (foreseeing and intending the consequences) or oblique (intending one consequence but foreseeing and being liable for another).
- The development of the test for determining oblique intent and liability for unintended consequences over several cases, culminating in the "virtual certainty" test in R v Woollin.
- Types of mens rea like intention and how scenarios can illustrate direct versus oblique intent.
This document discusses different types of deviances in society, including official deviance by bureaucrats, judges, and legislators; professional deviance by lawyers, teachers, doctors, and journalists; police deviance; landlord deviance; deviance in the electoral process; gender-based aggression; and trade union deviance. It provides examples for each type, such as bureaucrats accepting bribes, judges being influenced by money or politics, legislators exchanging favors for donations, and doctors performing unnecessary procedures for profit.
Este documento describe los delitos relacionados con la pornografía infantil según la ley peruana. Explica conceptos como pornografía infantil, pedofilia y pederastia. También analiza los bienes jurídicos protegidos por la ley como la dignidad y libertad sexual de los menores. Finalmente, describe los diferentes comportamientos típicos considerados delitos como la fabricación, promoción, distribución y posesión de material pornográfico infantil.
Detailed Presentation on Defamation Law in India
Made By:
Edited By: Ayush Patria, Sangam University, Bhilwara
Follow us on Instagram: @law_laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
The document discusses organized crime during the 1920s-1930s prohibition era in the United States. It describes how gangs formed to aid the illegal bootlegging of alcohol, with prominent gang leaders including Al Capone and Charles Luciano. It then examines several films that portrayed organized crime from this era, including Scarface (1932), which was loosely based on Al Capone's rise to power in Chicago during prohibition. Bonnie and Clyde is also discussed, noting how their criminal activities gained some public support due to the economic hardships of the Great Depression. Brief biographies are provided of several notorious gangsters from the period, including John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, and Baby Face Nelson.
The Digital Security Act 2018 in Bangladesh aims to curb crimes committed digitally such as spreading fake news, slander, and inciting violence. However, critics argue it could undermine media freedom and freedom of expression that are protected by the country's constitution and laws. The act allows the government to monitor digital platforms and restrict content it deems harmful or offensive. International organizations have called for reforming the laws to prevent overreach and protect civil liberties.
This document appears to be a student project report submitted to Indore Institute of Law. It includes sections typical of a research project such as an acknowledgements section thanking those who provided guidance, a declaration affirming the work as the student's own, and an introduction outlining the topic of a fair trial as protected by the Indian Constitution and international agreements. The body of the document discusses concepts such as the presumption of innocence, rights to counsel, speedy trial, and others that comprise the right to a fair trial under Indian law and international human rights law.
The document discusses India's Communication Convergence Bill from 2001. The bill aimed to establish a regulatory commission called the Communications Commission of India to regulate the growing convergence of telecom, broadcasting, and multimedia industries. It proposed five categories of licenses and sought to repeal five existing laws regulating telecom and broadcasting. While the bill did not fully materialize, it helped legalize some internet telephony and brought reforms to cable television regulation. New developments like TRAI's unified licensing regime point to ongoing evolution of India's convergence policies.
The Official Secrets Act 1923 is India's anti-espionage act. According to the act, actions which involve helping an enemy state against India are strongly condemned.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Constitution of India. It describes how the constitution establishes India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic that aims to secure justice, liberty, equality and fraternity for all citizens. Some key points covered include:
- It was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on November 26, 1949 and came into effect on January 26, 1950.
- It is the longest written constitution in the world, currently having a preamble, 25 parts, 12 schedules, 5 appendices and 448 articles.
- It guarantees fundamental rights to citizens under Part III, including right to freedom under Article 19 which covers freedom of speech, assembly, movement etc. subject to reasonable restrictions.
Adversarial and inquisitorial systems of justice have blurred distinctions, but key differences remain. In adversarial systems, parties are responsible for evidence and trials determine truth, while inquisitorial systems have faith in pre-trial processes and greater presumption of guilt. Adversarial systems allow prosecutorial discretion and guilty pleas to avoid trial, whereas inquisitorial systems limit discretion and continue trial processes regardless of accused's wishes. The nature of trials also differs, with adversarial trials having parties call witnesses and cross-examine, while inquisitorial trials are judge-led with fewer evidentiary rules. Victims also have a more recognized role in inquisitorial pre-trial investigations and trials.
BlBased
Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution of India states that, “all citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression”. The philosophy behind this Article lies in the Preamble of the Constitution, where a solemn resolve is made to secure to all its citizen, liberty of thought and expression. The exercise of this right is, however, subject to “reasonable restrictions” for certain purposes being imposed under Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India.
This document discusses public order crimes and offenses against public tranquility from various perspectives. It defines public order crimes as violations that interfere with normal societal operations and go against shared social values, even if they do not have an identifiable victim. It notes that public order is derived from the concept of "order publique" and aims to maintain more than just ordinary law and order. Additionally, it discusses approaches like broken windows theory and collective efficacy that aim to promote public order and prevent more serious crimes by cracking down on minor offenses.
The document discusses several schools of criminology including the cartographic school. The cartographic school used maps and statistics to study the relationship between crime and environmental/social factors. It examined crime patterns in different areas and time periods. This school introduced early spatial analyses of crime and how geography influences criminal behavior. It influenced the development of modern crime mapping techniques used by law enforcement.
Defamation involves making a false statement about someone that lowers their reputation or esteems them. It can be a civil or criminal offense. Criminal defamation is defined in the Criminal Code and involves intentionally publishing defamatory statements to harm someone's reputation. Defamation laws aim to protect people's reputations from injurious statements. Libel refers to defamatory statements that are written or published while slander involves spoken defamatory statements. There are defenses to defamation claims including proving the statement was true or a fair comment. Remedies for defamation include damages, injunctions, or requiring a retraction, correction, or apology be published.
This document summarizes criminal offenses against persons, including definitions, elements, and statutes regarding assault, battery, stalking, hazing, reckless endangerment, rape, and sexual battery. It discusses the evolution of laws from common law to modern statutes. For example, it notes that all states now define stalking as a crime and that legislative reforms have expanded definitions of rape to be gender-neutral and include other forms of nonconsensual penetration.
Charles Schenck was convicted under the Espionage Act for mailing leaflets urging resistance to the draft during WWI. He appealed to the Supreme Court claiming a First Amendment violation. The Court affirmed the conviction, with Justice Holmes introducing the "clear and present danger" test to determine if speech is not protected when it poses a substantive danger that Congress can prevent.
Thank you for your letter regarding the impact of Brown v. Board of Education. The unanimous decision declaring segregation unconstitutional was a landmark victory for civil rights and equality. While discrimination still exists, this ruling helped establish that all people deserve equal treatment and opportunities under the law regardless of race. Progress continues to be made towards the vision of a just society where individuals are judged based on their character rather than the color of their skin. The ACLU remains committed to defending civil liberties and promoting racial justice.
The document analyzes the justification and consequences of the Bush administration's use of torture following 9/11. It details how the 2002 "Torture Memos" authored by John Yoo and Jay Bybee redefined torture in a way that legalized previously illegal interrogation techniques. These memos were used to justify torturing detainees in Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib, contributing to major abuses. Many experts argue the memos were legally flawed and their extreme arguments have no foundation in law. While supporters claim torture provided valuable intelligence and stopped terror plots, evidence shows the most useful information was obtained through traditional interrogation methods without torture.
Levin Hate Crimes Worse By Definition 6Brian Levin
1) Hate crime laws enhance penalties for crimes motivated by discrimination against characteristics like race, religion, or sexual orientation. While the Supreme Court has affirmed some hate crime laws, it has rejected others that punish speech or are too vague.
2) The article analyzes Supreme Court cases that have refined the definition of hate crimes and discusses how these rulings have impacted different types of hate crime statutes.
3) In Wisconsin v. Mitchell (1993), the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a penalty enhancement law for hate crimes, finding these laws are consistent with traditional criminal justice goals.
Robert Watts was prosecuted under a 1917 statute prohibiting threats against the President after stating at a public rally that he did not want to kill black people but "if they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J." The Supreme Court reversed his conviction, finding his statement was made in the context of a political debate.
Three men belonging to the Ku Klux Klan burned a cross and were convicted under a Virginia statute prohibiting cross-burning with intent to intimidate. The Supreme Court upheld the statute as constitutional if intent to intimidate is shown.
Andrew Osantowski was convicted of making a terrorist threat for online chat room statements about
This Live Seminar examined how recent legal and policy trends—punctuated by a June 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision—may alter modalities of humanitarian engagement with non-state armed groups. In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a law criminalizing various forms of “material support” to prohibited groups.
Robert c. black politics, prejudice, and procedure - the impeachment trial o...RareBooksnRecords
- The impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson in 1868 was highly political but not as unfair as traditionally believed. While political and personal biases existed, procedural rulings often favored Johnson's defense. Chief Justice Chase, who presided over the trial, had his own political ambitions and worked to Johnson's benefit, helping acquit him by one vote. The impeachment was an inherently political act, as the Constitution intends impeachment trials to be, and claims of unfairness do not stand up to scrutiny.
Vice crimes refer to offenses against public morality such as prostitution, gambling, and drug and alcohol offenses. The document provides an overview of various vice crimes including their historical development and current legal status. It summarizes laws around issues like obscenity, public intoxication, controlled substances, and drug courts as alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent drug offenders.
The document discusses the key freedoms protected by the First Amendment: freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. It provides details on what each freedom entails and prohibits the government from infringing on these rights. However, it notes that the First Amendment only applies to government restrictions and not actions taken by private individuals or companies. Some exceptions to free speech, like threats and copyright infringement, are also outlined.
Case Summaries for Criminal Procedure, 6eJohn Scheb and John M. .docxtidwellveronique
Case Summaries for Criminal Procedure, 6e
John Scheb and John M. Scheb IIChapter 1
Duncan v. Louisiana (1968). Here the Supreme Court made the right of trial by jury applicable to defendants in state criminal cases. In a concurring opinion joined by Justice Douglas, Justice Black expressed his satisfaction with what the Court had done under the mantle of selective incorporation: “I believe as strongly as ever that the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to make the Bill of Rights applicable to the States. I have been willing to support the selective incorporation doctrine, however, as an alternative, although perhaps less historically supportable than complete incorporation. ... [T]he selective incorporation process has the virtue of having already worked to make most of the Bill of Rights protections applicable to the States.”
Boykin v. Alabama (1969). Boykin pled guilty to five counts of common law robbery; however, at this time Alabama law provided for a jury to determine a defendant’s sentence. At the sentencing phase, the trial judge asked Boykin no questions regarding the voluntariness of his plea agreement nor did Boykin address the court. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony; however, Boykin’s attorney failed to present any mitigating evidence on behalf of Mr. Boykin including the fact that there was no indication the defendant had a prior criminal history. The jury returned a death sentence. The Supreme Court, speaking through Justice Douglas, held “several federal constitutional rights are involved in a waiver that takes place when a plea of guilty is entered in a state criminal trial. First, is the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment…. Second, is the right to trial by jury. Third, is the right to confront one’s accusers. We cannot presume a waiver of these important federal rights from a silent record.” The Supreme Court reversed the defendant’s sentence because there was no indication in the court record that his plea was made “voluntary and understandingly.”
Chapter 2
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). Clarence Earl Gideon, a 51 year-old indigent “drifter” who had been in and out of jails all his adult life, was charged with felonious breaking and entering. At trial, he requested that the court appoint an attorney to represent him. The court refused, citing the Florida law that required appointment of counsel for indigent defendants only in capital cases. While serving his sentence in the Florida State Prison, Gideon unsuccessfully challenged his conviction in the Florida Supreme Court on a writ of habeas corpus. He then obtained review by the U.S. Supreme Court on a writ of certiorari. In a unanimous decision, the Court reversed Gideon’s conviction. Writing for the Court, Hugo Black opined that “[t]he right of one charged with a crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours.” Gideon v. Wainwright over ...
This document argues that the civil rights movement cannot be defined as only occurring between 1954 and 1968. It references writings and petitions from the 19th century demonstrating appeals for racial equality and critiques of American hypocrisy regarding its proclaimed ideals of freedom and democracy. The document asserts that the movement was driven by a fight for human rights and dignity, not just civil rights, and that this struggle endured for centuries through oppression, violence and lack of basic safety for African Americans. Limiting the movement to only a few decades ignores centuries of relevant history and the lived experiences of suffering under the system of segregation and racial discrimination.
The Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation and the "separate but equal" doctrine. Homer Plessy, a black man, was arrested for sitting in the white railway car in Louisiana in violation of the state's Separate Car Act requiring racial segregation on trains. The Supreme Court ruled that segregation laws did not violate the 14th Amendment as long as black and white facilities were equal. Only Justice Harlan dissented, arguing that the Constitution is colorblind and the decision would encourage further discrimination. The ruling established racial segregation as legal for over 50 years until it was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education.
The document discusses civil liberties in the United States Constitution. It provides context on the Bill of Rights and how it protects individual freedoms such as freedom of speech, press, religion, and protections from unlawful search and seizure. It also discusses ongoing debates around balancing individual rights with societal interests and national security, including discussions on the USA PATRIOT Act and presidential powers in times of war or crisis.
The document summarizes several important court cases and laws related to race and gender issues in U.S. history. It discusses how early laws and court rulings restricted the rights of Native Americans, Chinese immigrants, and enslaved people. It then summarizes key civil rights milestones like the Emancipation Proclamation, women's suffrage, and landmark Supreme Court cases establishing desegregation and same-sex marriage rights.
The document discusses jury nullification and whether ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings. It provides background on two issues regarding race and the criminal justice system: that minorities receive harsher sentences than whites, and dissatisfaction with public defender services and plea bargaining. The document also discusses a case where three teens were acquitted of serious charges in the beating death of a Mexican immigrant, which elicited cheers. Scholars are discussed who view ethnicity-based jury nullification as either a way to vote against injustice or as a danger to society.
Political Prisoners, Prisons, and Black Liberation-by Dr. Angela Y. DavisRBG Communiversity
This document discusses the history of political prisoners and civil disobedience in the fight against injustice and oppression, particularly regarding slavery and racism in the US. It argues that acts of resistance, even if illegal, have often been necessary and justified when opposing unjust laws and social conditions that directly threaten or exploit oppressed groups. Throughout history, black liberation movements have had to violate laws in order to defend themselves and advance their cause for freedom and equality. The document asserts that officials often label such political acts as merely criminal in order to discredit resistance movements and preserve the status quo of oppression.
This document summarizes key Supreme Court cases related to freedom of speech in the United States. It discusses early 20th century cases that upheld convictions for anti-war speech during WWI. It then reviews landmark cases that established doctrines around offensive speech, symbolic speech, sexually explicit speech, and freedom of association. The document analyzes several iconic cases, like Texas v. Johnson, Snyder v. Phelps, and Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, that shaped modern understandings of the limits and protections of the First Amendment.
This document discusses hate groups and hate crimes. It begins by outlining objectives of showing how dehumanization can take effect and what happens when individuals are set up to fail. It then provides definitions of hate crimes and hate groups under Canadian law. Several examples of hate groups are described on both the left and right sides of the political spectrum. Common rhetoric and propaganda methods used by these groups are examined, including dehumanization, authoritarian leadership, and the promotion of destructive ideologies. Statistics on hate crimes in Canada and locally in Toronto are also presented.
Similar to Fighting words, incitement, true threats and the First Amendment (19)
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
3. Free speech or fighting words?
Fact: Chaplinsky, a
Jehovah's Witness, stirred up
an angry crowd with his
proselytizing.
Fact: He called a city
marshal a "damned
racketeer" and a "damned
Fascist."
Fact: The marshal arrested
him under a state law that
forbids offensive or derisive
speech or name-calling in
public.
4. Fighting words are not protected
Chaplinsky v. New
Hampshire, 1942
“…The right of free speech is
not absolute at all times and
under all circumstances.”
- Justice Frank Murphy, 1942
5. Fghting words are not protected
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942
“There are certain well defined and narrowly limited classes of
speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never
been thought to raise any Constitutional problem.
“These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous,
and the insulting or 'fighting' words — those which, by their
very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate
breach of the peace.”
7. Free speech or fighting words?
Terminiello v. Chicago, 1949
Arthur Terminiello, an ex-Catholic priest, was
charged with disorderly conduct after he gave a
racist, anti-Semitic speech in a Chicago
auditorium to the Christian Veterans of America.
8. Free speech invites dispute
Terminiello v. Chicago, 1949
Supreme Court overturned Terminiello's
conviction, based on incorrect jury instructions.
“...a function of free speech under our system of government is to
invite dispute. It may indeed serve its high purpose when it induces
a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they
are, or even stirs people to anger. Speech is often provocative and
challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and
have profound unsettling effects as it presses for acceptance of an
idea.”
– Justice William Douglas
9. Free speech or fighting words?
Paul Cohen
arrested for
disturbing the
peace through
“offensive
conduct” for
wearing “Fuck
the Draft” on his
jacket in Los
Angeles County
Courthouse.
10. “Fuck the Draft” not fighting words
Cohen v. California, 1971
The epithet on Paul Cohen's jacket was not
directed to the “person of the hearer.” Moreover,
“no individual actually or likely to be present
could reasonably have regarded the words on
appellant's jacket as a direct personal insult.”
In other words, fighting words must be directed at
an individual within hearing distance.
11. Free speech or fighting words?
Gooding v. Wilson, 1971
Fact: Johnny Wilson, a Vietnam War protester, made
threatening and insulting remarks to police officers.
Specifically, he said: “You son of a bitch, I’ll choke you
to death”; “White son of a bitch, I’ll kill you”; and “You
son of a bitch . . . I’ll cut you all to pieces.”
Fact: Police arrested him under a Georgia statute that
prohibited anyone from using, without provocation,
“opprobrious words or abusive language, tending to
cause a breach of the peace.” The language had to be
spoken to or about another person in his or her
presence.
12. Laws must be narrowly defined
Gooding v. Wilson, 1971
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4
split decision, declared the
statute unconstitutionally
overbroad, finding the
dictionary definitions of the
adjectives “opprobrious” and
“abusive” to reach beyond mere
fighting words. The majority, led
by Justice William Brennan,
reaffirmed the notion that
words may not be banned
simply because of their
offensive or vulgar nature.
14. Free speech or fighting words?
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Fact: Robert Viktoria and other teenagers burned a cross on
the fenced front lawn of an African-American family.
Fact: Viktoria was convicted of several charges, including
violating the St. Paul Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance.
Fact: The anti-bias ordinance states: "Whoever places on
public or private property a symbol, object, appellation,
characterization or graffiti, including, but not limited to, a
burning cross or Nazi swastika, which one knows or has
reasonable grounds to know arouses anger, alarm or
resentment in others on the basis of race, color, creed, religion
or gender commits disorderly conduct and shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor."
15. Laws can't be content-based
In a controversial decision,
the Supreme Court ruled that
the City of St. Paul could not
ban fighting words that were
limited to just the ones it
found objectionable – that is,
words based on race, color,
creed, religion or gender.
Writing for the majority,
Justice Antonin Scalia said:
“It (the St. Paul law) prohibits
otherwise permitted speech
solely on the basis of the
subjects the speech
addresses.”
16. Laws can't be content-based
Writing for the minority, Justice
Byron White agreed that St.
Paul's anti-bias law violated
the First Amendment.
But they rejected the
reasoning of the majority.
Instead, they argued, the
government can't restrict
speech just because it creates
feelings of anger, alarm and
resentment.
17. Free speech or fighting words?
Although the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the
fighting words doctrine in spirit several times, it
has never actually upheld a conviction based
solely on fighting words.
Despite more than 70 years of jurisprudence
following the 1942 Chaplinsky case, courts still
have a hard time drawing the line between free
speech and fighting words.
18. Free speech or fighting words?
An Ohio woman cursed during a confrontation
with a police officer. She was convicted of
disorderly conduct.
19. Free speech!
City of Garfield Heights v. Yaro, 1999
An Ohio appeals court said her speech did not
constitute fighting words.
20. Free speech or fighting words?
Kelly Jo Hock, whose driver's license was
suspended, was observed by an Ohio
policeman driving into her apartment parking lot.
Hock refused to produce her license and
complained to the officer that she was the victim
of frequent police harassment.
She said, “Fuck you, asshole,” in a normal tone of
voice as she walked away.
She was arrested for disorderly conduct.
21. Free speech!
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Hock, 1998
Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a “single
profane remark” did not constitute fighting
words. The court ruled that a jury could not
reasonably determine that Hock's single remark
“risked an immediate breach of the peace.”
22. Free speech or fighting words?
In Hamilton, Ohio, a citizen named Johnson was
convicted of violating a city ordinance that made
it unlawful to "verbally abuse or make
derogatory remarks" to a police officer.
23. Fighting words!
City of Hamilton v. Johnson, 1999
An Ohio appeals court said the City of Hamilton's
ordinance against verbally abusing police
officers was constitutional. The reason: The
ordinance could be interpreted to apply only to
fighting words, not to other constitutionally
protected words.
25. Free speech or incitement?
Fact: Ku Klux Klan leader
Clarence Brandenburg (in
robe) invited a TV crew to
a Klan rally in 1964.
Fact: At the rally,
Brandenburg and others
urged revenge against
African Americans, Jews
and those who supported
them.
Fact: Brandenburg was
convicted under an Ohio
statute that made it illegal
to advocate violence.
26. Advocacy of violence
What Brandenburg said in front of TV cameras:
“We’re not a revengent organization, but if our
president, our Congress, our Supreme Court,
continues to suppress the white, Caucasian
race, it’s possible that there might have to be
some revengeance [sic] taken.”
While Brandenburg was not evidently armed,
other Klansmen at the rally were.
27. State can't restrict advocacy
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969
The Supreme Court ruled that:
"Freedoms of speech and press do not permit a
State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or
of law violation except where such advocacy is
directed to inciting or producing imminent
lawless action and is likely to incite or produce
such action."
28. The Brandenburg test
The Supreme Court decision created the
"imminent lawless action" test:
1.Intent: Is the speech intended to incite
imminent lawless action?
2.Likelihood: Is such lawless action likely?
30. Free speech or true threats?
Watts v. United States, 1969
At an anti-Vietnam War protest in Washington,
D.C., Robert Watts, 18, says: “If they ever make
me carry a rifle, the first man I want to get in my
sights is L.B.J. They are not going to make me
kill my black brothers.”
An undercover Army counterintelligence officer
overhears him.
Watts is convicted for threatening the life of the
president (Lyndon B. Johnson).
31. Political speech is not a true threat
Watts v. United States, 1969
Supreme Court ruled that Watts' statements were
“a kind of very crude offensive method of stating
a political opposition to the President.”
The court said the law engenders “a profound
national commitment to the principle that debate
on public issues should be uninhibited, robust,
and wide-open, and that it may well include
vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly
sharp attacks on government and public
officials.”
32. So what is a true threat?
Fact: Barry Black, left, and
two other men were arrested
in separate incidents for
burning crosses.
Fact: The men were
convicted under a Virginia
law that made it a felony to
burn a cross with the intent of
intimidating any person or
group of persons.
Fact: The law said the mere
fact of burning a cross was
evidence of intent to
intimidate.
33. True threats defined
Black v. Virginia, 2003
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
defined "true threats" as
statements in which the speaker
means to communicate a
serious expression of an intent
to commit an act of unlawful
violence to a particular individual
or group of individuals.
34. True threats defined
Furthermore, the speaker need not actually intend
to carry out the threat.
Rather, a prohibition on true threats protects
individuals from the fear of violence, in addition
to protecting people from the possibility that the
threatened violence will occur.
Intimidation is a type of true threat, where a
speaker directs a threat to a person or group of
persons with the intent of placing the victim in
fear of bodily harm or death.
35. Confusion over true threats
Must a speaker intend to intimidate or threaten
others in order for the speech to be considered
a true threat?
Is it enough if the recipient reasonably believes
the speech is a threat?