Fighting Global
Corruption

      Presented by Eric Pesik
  Asia Risk Professionals Congress
    Carlton Hotel, Singapore, 2012
Fighting Global
             Corruption
Fighting global corruption by
building sustainable corruption risk
assessment process and developing a
proactive risk management plan
proportional to your organization’s
risk exposure
Agenda:

1.   New Anti-Corruption Laws
2.   Risk Assessment Process
3.   Risk Management Plan
4.   Responsibility of Risk Officers
Agenda:

1.   New Anti-Corruption Laws
2.   Risk Assessment Process
3.   Risk Management Plan
4.   Responsibility of Risk Officers
Anti-Corruption Laws
US Foreign Corrupt
Practice Act (FCPA)
UK Bribery Act
China Anti-Bribery
     Amendments
Commercial
   Bribery
Bribery of
Government
Officials
Dodd-Frank
Whistleblower
Global Reach
Every
Country
Prohibits
Bribery
Agenda:

1.   New Anti-Corruption Laws
2.   Risk Assessment Process
3.   Risk Management Plan
4.   Responsibility of Risk Officers
FCPA Fines in Millions
            Siemens (Germany)                                    $800
          KBR/Halliburton (USA)                           $579
                       BAE (UK)                    $400
                                                        Only US
Snamprogetti/ENI (Holland/Italy)                  $365 company
               Technip (France)                  $338
        JGC Corporation (Japan)            $219
         Daimler AG (Germany)             $185
             Jeffrey Tessler (UK)     $149
         Alcatel-Lucent (France)     $137
         Panalpina (Switzerland)    $82
58
Average age of persons
 currently in US prisons
   for FCPA convictions

               Aaron G. Murphey, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act:
A Practical Resource for Managers and Executives, 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Value of All Losses
        (Occupational Frauds by Category)


             Financial                                                      68%
       Statement Fraud
                 Asset                                21%
      Misappropriation
                  Corruption                      11%




             May exceed 100% because cases involve multiple categories.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
Frequency of All Losses
        (Occupational Frauds by Category)


             Financial                        5%
       Statement Fraud
                 Asset                                                      86%
      Misappropriation
                  Corruption                             33%




             May exceed 100% because cases involve multiple categories.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
Balancing
Proportionality
Risk by
Geography




  Transparency International 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index
Risk by
                Industry

Each industry is different
Risk by
Customers
Intermediaries
increase risk




       Risk by
Intermediaries
Risk by
Company
Risk by
Constituents
Corruption Risk
Risk Inventory
Likelihood & Impact
        Scale


                  Personal
                Commitment
                   Form
Likelihood Rating Scale
                                          Almost
               Unlikely        Likely
                                          Certain

                 Not more                 More than
                              One every
Frequency:     than every 3               once per
                              1-3 years
                  years                     year




Probability:   10% - 30%      30% - 60%    > 60%
Impact/Severity Rating Scale
                  Minor         Moderate           Major
 Financial
                < $1 Million     $1-5 Million    > $5 Million
  Impact:
                                               Govt. / Official
               Pub Awareness Pub Concern
Reputational                                   Investigation
  Impact:         Regional    State / National International
                   Internal    Shareholders Public Markets
                 Little or no  Business Unit     Company
                    Impact      or Function     Operations
                  Asking for     Doubting       Canceling
Operational     Reassurances      Business       Business
 Impact:         Individuals    Individuals      Criminal
                 Disciplined    Terminated       Sanctions
                  Employee       Employee         Loss of
                    Morale       Turnover       Mgrs/Execs
Risk Inventory
1. Political Contributions/Activities
2. Charitable and Industrial Contributions
3. Company Memberships
4. Expense Accounts
5. Consultants and Professional Service
   Providers
6. Leadership
7. Company Culture
8. Accurate Books and Records
9. Expense Accounts
10.Acquisitions
11.Business Combinations
12.Third Party Representatives and Agents
13.Procurement
14.Gifts, Gratuities, and Entertainment
15.Export, Import, Customs
Cost-benefit analysis

Likelihood
     &          Cost of
Magnitude      Avoidance
Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood




                 High Impact
High Impact                               High Impact




                                       High Likelihood
Low Likelihood

                          Low Impact




Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood
Low Impact                                 Low Impact
Low Likelihood                              High Likelihood




                      High Impact
High Impact                                    High Impact

    Add Cost to
  Avoid or Mitigate



                                            High Likelihood
Low Likelihood

                               Low Impact




Low Likelihood                              High Likelihood
Low Impact                                      Low Impact
Agenda:

1.   New Anti-Corruption Laws
2.   Risk Assessment Process
3.   Risk Management Plan
4.   Responsibility of Risk Officers
Risk Inventory
Likelihood & Impact
        Scale


                  Personal
                Commitment
                   Form
Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood




                 High Impact
High Impact                               High Impact




                                       High Likelihood
Low Likelihood

                          Low Impact




Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood
Low Impact                                 Low Impact
Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood




                 High Impact
High Impact                               High Impact




                                       High Likelihood
Low Likelihood

                          Low Impact




Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood
Low Impact                                 Low Impact
Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood




                 High Impact
High Impact                               High Impact




                                       High Likelihood
Low Likelihood

                          Low Impact




Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood
Low Impact                                 Low Impact
Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood




                 High Impact
High Impact                               High Impact




                                       High Likelihood
Low Likelihood

                          Low Impact




Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood
Low Impact                                 Low Impact
Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood




                 High Impact
High Impact                               High Impact




                                       High Likelihood
Low Likelihood

                          Low Impact




Low Likelihood                         High Likelihood
Low Impact                                 Low Impact
Risk Inventory
Likelihood & Impact
        Scale


                  Personal
                Commitment
                   Form
Risk Inventory
Likelihood & Impact
        Scale
           Risk Management Plan
           1.
           2.
           3.      Personal
           4.    Commitment
           5.       Form
           6.
           7.
           8.
           9.
           10.
Example:
Anonymous
   Tip Line
Tip                                          40.2%
        Management Review                          15.4%
                Internal Audit                  13.9%
                  By Accident               8.3%
     Account Reconciliation              6.1%
     Document Examination               5.2%
               External Audit          4.6%
   Surveillance/Monitoring            2.6%
           Notified by Police        1.8%
                   Confession
                   IT Controls
                                    1.0%
                                    0.8%
                                                      Fraud
                                                   Detection
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
Tip With Hotline                                              47.1%
                            Tip                                          40.2%
        Management Review                          15.4%
                Internal Audit                  13.9%
                  By Accident               8.3%
     Account Reconciliation              6.1%
     Document Examination               5.2%
               External Audit          4.6%
   Surveillance/Monitoring            2.6%
           Notified by Police        1.8%
                   Confession
                   IT Controls
                                    1.0%
                                                      Fraud
                                                   Detection
                                    0.8%



Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
Tip Without Hotline                                       33.8%
                            Tip                                          40.2%
        Management Review                          15.4%
                Internal Audit                  13.9%
                  By Accident               8.3%
     Account Reconciliation              6.1%
     Document Examination               5.2%
               External Audit          4.6%
   Surveillance/Monitoring            2.6%
           Notified by Police        1.8%
                   Confession
                   IT Controls
                                    1.0%
                                    0.8%
                                                      Fraud
                                                   Detection
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
13.3%
         Tip Without Hotline                                       33.8%
                            Tip                                          40.2%
        Management Review                          15.4%
                Internal Audit                  13.9%
                  By Accident               8.3%
     Account Reconciliation              6.1%
     Document Examination               5.2%
               External Audit          4.6%
   Surveillance/Monitoring            2.6%
           Notified by Police        1.8%
                   Confession
                   IT Controls
                                    1.0%
                                    0.8%
                                                      Fraud
                                                   Detection
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
Dodd-Frank
Whistleblower
Agenda:

1.   New Anti-Corruption Laws
2.   Risk Assessment Process
3.   Risk Management Plan
4.   Responsibility of Risk Officers
Risk Inventory
Likelihood & Impact
        Scale
           Risk Management Plan
           1.
           2.
           3.      Personal
           4.    Commitment
           5.       Form
           6.
           7.
           8.
           9.
           10.
Constituency
Buy-in
Management
Buy-in
Risk Management Plan     Low Like o
                         High Impliht od
                                 ac




                                           High Impact
 1.                                                         High Likeliho
 2.                                                                      od
                                                               High Impact
 3.
 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

                        Low Likelihoo
                                     d                    High Likeliho
                                                                       od




                                           Low Impact
                       Low Likelih
                       Low Impactood
                                                         High Likeliho
                                                                      od
                                                             Low Impact
Official
Tone From
   the Top
don’t get trapped
Fighting Global
Corruption
Questions?
All images are from Microsoft Office Online, used with
permission from Microsoft, except for the following
images licensed under Flickr Creative Commons
Attribution License

          Businessman behind web By internets_dairy               Meeting nieuwe leden
          flickr.com/photos/16339684@N00/2784622731/              flickr.com/photos/kripptic/1954828422/




          Parlament by Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya      Blue Telephone by By UggBoy/UggGirl
          flickr.com/photos/convergenciademocratica/6197445493/   flickr.com/photos/uggboy/5345135964/




          Signpost by Andrea_44
          flickr.com/photos/8431398@N04/2680944871/


                                                                  AdjustTie by Dplanet
                                                                  flickr.com/photos/dplanet/94441582/



          Businessman by Kripptic                                 No Pictures by Dplanet
          flickr.com/photos/kripptic/1954828422/                  flickr.com/photos/dplanet/94442623/

Fighting Global Corruption by @EricPesik

  • 1.
    Fighting Global Corruption Presented by Eric Pesik Asia Risk Professionals Congress Carlton Hotel, Singapore, 2012
  • 2.
    Fighting Global Corruption Fighting global corruption by building sustainable corruption risk assessment process and developing a proactive risk management plan proportional to your organization’s risk exposure
  • 3.
    Agenda: 1. New Anti-Corruption Laws 2. Risk Assessment Process 3. Risk Management Plan 4. Responsibility of Risk Officers
  • 4.
    Agenda: 1. New Anti-Corruption Laws 2. Risk Assessment Process 3. Risk Management Plan 4. Responsibility of Risk Officers
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Commercial Bribery
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Agenda: 1. New Anti-Corruption Laws 2. Risk Assessment Process 3. Risk Management Plan 4. Responsibility of Risk Officers
  • 15.
    FCPA Fines inMillions Siemens (Germany) $800 KBR/Halliburton (USA) $579 BAE (UK) $400 Only US Snamprogetti/ENI (Holland/Italy) $365 company Technip (France) $338 JGC Corporation (Japan) $219 Daimler AG (Germany) $185 Jeffrey Tessler (UK) $149 Alcatel-Lucent (France) $137 Panalpina (Switzerland) $82
  • 16.
    58 Average age ofpersons currently in US prisons for FCPA convictions Aaron G. Murphey, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Practical Resource for Managers and Executives, 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • 17.
    Value of AllLosses (Occupational Frauds by Category) Financial 68% Statement Fraud Asset 21% Misappropriation Corruption 11% May exceed 100% because cases involve multiple categories. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
  • 18.
    Frequency of AllLosses (Occupational Frauds by Category) Financial 5% Statement Fraud Asset 86% Misappropriation Corruption 33% May exceed 100% because cases involve multiple categories. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Risk by Geography Transparency International 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index
  • 21.
    Risk by Industry Each industry is different
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Intermediaries increase risk Risk by Intermediaries
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 28.
    Risk Inventory Likelihood &Impact Scale Personal Commitment Form
  • 29.
    Likelihood Rating Scale Almost Unlikely Likely Certain Not more More than One every Frequency: than every 3 once per 1-3 years years year Probability: 10% - 30% 30% - 60% > 60%
  • 30.
    Impact/Severity Rating Scale Minor Moderate Major Financial < $1 Million $1-5 Million > $5 Million Impact: Govt. / Official Pub Awareness Pub Concern Reputational Investigation Impact: Regional State / National International Internal Shareholders Public Markets Little or no Business Unit Company Impact or Function Operations Asking for Doubting Canceling Operational Reassurances Business Business Impact: Individuals Individuals Criminal Disciplined Terminated Sanctions Employee Employee Loss of Morale Turnover Mgrs/Execs
  • 31.
    Risk Inventory 1. PoliticalContributions/Activities 2. Charitable and Industrial Contributions 3. Company Memberships 4. Expense Accounts 5. Consultants and Professional Service Providers 6. Leadership 7. Company Culture 8. Accurate Books and Records 9. Expense Accounts 10.Acquisitions 11.Business Combinations 12.Third Party Representatives and Agents 13.Procurement 14.Gifts, Gratuities, and Entertainment 15.Export, Import, Customs
  • 32.
    Cost-benefit analysis Likelihood & Cost of Magnitude Avoidance
  • 34.
    Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Impact High Impact High Impact High Likelihood Low Likelihood Low Impact Low Likelihood High Likelihood Low Impact Low Impact
  • 35.
    Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Impact High Impact High Impact Add Cost to Avoid or Mitigate High Likelihood Low Likelihood Low Impact Low Likelihood High Likelihood Low Impact Low Impact
  • 36.
    Agenda: 1. New Anti-Corruption Laws 2. Risk Assessment Process 3. Risk Management Plan 4. Responsibility of Risk Officers
  • 37.
    Risk Inventory Likelihood &Impact Scale Personal Commitment Form
  • 38.
    Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Impact High Impact High Impact High Likelihood Low Likelihood Low Impact Low Likelihood High Likelihood Low Impact Low Impact
  • 39.
    Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Impact High Impact High Impact High Likelihood Low Likelihood Low Impact Low Likelihood High Likelihood Low Impact Low Impact
  • 40.
    Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Impact High Impact High Impact High Likelihood Low Likelihood Low Impact Low Likelihood High Likelihood Low Impact Low Impact
  • 41.
    Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Impact High Impact High Impact High Likelihood Low Likelihood Low Impact Low Likelihood High Likelihood Low Impact Low Impact
  • 42.
    Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Impact High Impact High Impact High Likelihood Low Likelihood Low Impact Low Likelihood High Likelihood Low Impact Low Impact
  • 43.
    Risk Inventory Likelihood &Impact Scale Personal Commitment Form
  • 44.
    Risk Inventory Likelihood &Impact Scale Risk Management Plan 1. 2. 3. Personal 4. Commitment 5. Form 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
  • 45.
  • 46.
    Tip 40.2% Management Review 15.4% Internal Audit 13.9% By Accident 8.3% Account Reconciliation 6.1% Document Examination 5.2% External Audit 4.6% Surveillance/Monitoring 2.6% Notified by Police 1.8% Confession IT Controls 1.0% 0.8% Fraud Detection Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
  • 47.
    Tip With Hotline 47.1% Tip 40.2% Management Review 15.4% Internal Audit 13.9% By Accident 8.3% Account Reconciliation 6.1% Document Examination 5.2% External Audit 4.6% Surveillance/Monitoring 2.6% Notified by Police 1.8% Confession IT Controls 1.0% Fraud Detection 0.8% Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
  • 48.
    Tip Without Hotline 33.8% Tip 40.2% Management Review 15.4% Internal Audit 13.9% By Accident 8.3% Account Reconciliation 6.1% Document Examination 5.2% External Audit 4.6% Surveillance/Monitoring 2.6% Notified by Police 1.8% Confession IT Controls 1.0% 0.8% Fraud Detection Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
  • 49.
    13.3% Tip Without Hotline 33.8% Tip 40.2% Management Review 15.4% Internal Audit 13.9% By Accident 8.3% Account Reconciliation 6.1% Document Examination 5.2% External Audit 4.6% Surveillance/Monitoring 2.6% Notified by Police 1.8% Confession IT Controls 1.0% 0.8% Fraud Detection Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations 2010 Global Fraud Study
  • 50.
  • 51.
    Agenda: 1. New Anti-Corruption Laws 2. Risk Assessment Process 3. Risk Management Plan 4. Responsibility of Risk Officers
  • 52.
    Risk Inventory Likelihood &Impact Scale Risk Management Plan 1. 2. 3. Personal 4. Commitment 5. Form 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55.
    Risk Management Plan Low Like o High Impliht od ac High Impact 1. High Likeliho 2. od High Impact 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Low Likelihoo d High Likeliho od Low Impact Low Likelih Low Impactood High Likeliho od Low Impact
  • 56.
  • 58.
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61.
    All images arefrom Microsoft Office Online, used with permission from Microsoft, except for the following images licensed under Flickr Creative Commons Attribution License Businessman behind web By internets_dairy Meeting nieuwe leden flickr.com/photos/16339684@N00/2784622731/ flickr.com/photos/kripptic/1954828422/ Parlament by Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya Blue Telephone by By UggBoy/UggGirl flickr.com/photos/convergenciademocratica/6197445493/ flickr.com/photos/uggboy/5345135964/ Signpost by Andrea_44 flickr.com/photos/8431398@N04/2680944871/ AdjustTie by Dplanet flickr.com/photos/dplanet/94441582/ Businessman by Kripptic No Pictures by Dplanet flickr.com/photos/kripptic/1954828422/ flickr.com/photos/dplanet/94442623/