Stage 4:
Description,
Analysis and
Interpretation
Primary Data
Environmental Quality Assessment
Describe and justify how you used measurements of Central Tendency
(averages) to analyse your data.
 Using Excel measurements of mean and median Environmental Quality
Scores were calculated (see next slide)
These measurement provide a typical Environmental Quality Score value
for each location and can be used as an initial comparison point
Outer Suburbs - Quinton   Inner Suburbs - Ladywood
   
Measurement Value Measurement Value  
Mean 9 Mean -18  
Median 7      Median -18   
What did the results of these measurements show?
The average Environmental Quality Scores for Quinton are positive, between 7 
(median) and 9 (mean) indicating that perceptions of this area are above 
average, whilst the average score for Ladywood is negative, -18 (both mean and 
median) indicating that this area is perceived to have an environmental quality  
much lower than average.
Describe and Justify the use of Inter-Quartile Range  (IQR) data
Qunton LQ 4
Ladywoood UQ -12
 By comparing the level of overlap between the Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) 
for the  Quinton and Ladywood data it is possible to determine if a 
significant difference exists. (see next slide)
• As the upper quartile for Ladywood’s Environmental Quality Score is below the
lower quartile for Quinton, it can be said that a significant difference exists between
the perceived environmental quality of the two areas. Quinton has a significantly
higher environmental quality than Ladywood
What did the overlap of the IQR for different data sets show?
Describe and Justify the use of the Mann Whitney U Test.
 A Mann Whitney U Test will determine to a level of confidence
(95%,99% or 99.9%) whether there is a significant difference between
the Environmental Quality Scores for Quinton and Ladywood.
What did the results of this show?
• Using Minitab the results for this test are displayed below:
Mann-Whitney Test and CI: Quinton EQA, Ladywood EQA
N Median
Quinton EQA 48 7.000
Ladywood EQA 48 -17.500
Point estimate for ETA1-ETA2 is 26.000
95.0 Percent CI for ETA1-ETA2 is (23.000,30.000)
W = 3475.5
Test of ETA1 = ETA2 vs ETA1 > ETA2 is significant at 0.0000
The test is significant at 0.0000 This is the ‘p’ value.
See next slide for interpretation of ‘p’
values
p value Interpretation
>0.05 The result of the test is not significant
<0.05 With greater than 95% confidence the result is significant
<0.01 With greater than 99% confidence the result is significant
<0.001 With greater than 99.9% confidence the result is significant
• Therefore it can be said that with greater than 99.9% confidence, the
Environmental Quality Scores for Quinton are significantly higher than
those for Ladywood.
Census Data
Summarise what the bar charts showed in terms of socio-economic indicators?
• For all of the indicators of wealth
- Owner Occupied
- 2 or more cars
- Employed
- Mngmnt/ Prof occupations
Quinton has a higher % than
Ladywood and in most cases the
average for Birmingham
• For all of the indicators of deprivation
- Social rented
- 0 cars
- Unemployed
- No Qualifications
Ladywood has a higher % than Quinton
and in most cases the average for
Birmingham
Police Crime Data
Describe and justify how you used measurements of Central Tendency ( averages) to analyse your data.
What did the results of these measurements show?
Describe and Justify the use of Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) data.
What did the overlap of the IQR for different data sets show?
Describe and Justify the use of the Mann Whitney U Test.
What did the results of this show?
YOU need to do this bit on your own!!
Use Minitab to complete the Mann Whitney U Test –
see next slides for help
Great!
I love doing statistics
Step 4.
Phew !
Another section
complete

Fieldwork 2015 data analysis stage

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Primary Data Environmental QualityAssessment Describe and justify how you used measurements of Central Tendency (averages) to analyse your data.  Using Excel measurements of mean and median Environmental Quality Scores were calculated (see next slide) These measurement provide a typical Environmental Quality Score value for each location and can be used as an initial comparison point
  • 3.
    Outer Suburbs -Quinton   Inner Suburbs - Ladywood     Measurement Value Measurement Value   Mean 9 Mean -18   Median 7      Median -18    What did the results of these measurements show? The average Environmental Quality Scores for Quinton are positive, between 7  (median) and 9 (mean) indicating that perceptions of this area are above  average, whilst the average score for Ladywood is negative, -18 (both mean and  median) indicating that this area is perceived to have an environmental quality   much lower than average.
  • 4.
    Describe and Justify the use of Inter-Quartile Range  (IQR) data Qunton LQ4 Ladywoood UQ -12  By comparing the level of overlap between the Inter-Quartile Range (IQR)  for the  Quinton and Ladywood data it is possible to determine if a  significant difference exists. (see next slide)
  • 5.
    • As theupper quartile for Ladywood’s Environmental Quality Score is below the lower quartile for Quinton, it can be said that a significant difference exists between the perceived environmental quality of the two areas. Quinton has a significantly higher environmental quality than Ladywood What did the overlap of the IQR for different data sets show?
  • 6.
    Describe and Justifythe use of the Mann Whitney U Test.  A Mann Whitney U Test will determine to a level of confidence (95%,99% or 99.9%) whether there is a significant difference between the Environmental Quality Scores for Quinton and Ladywood. What did the results of this show? • Using Minitab the results for this test are displayed below: Mann-Whitney Test and CI: Quinton EQA, Ladywood EQA N Median Quinton EQA 48 7.000 Ladywood EQA 48 -17.500 Point estimate for ETA1-ETA2 is 26.000 95.0 Percent CI for ETA1-ETA2 is (23.000,30.000) W = 3475.5 Test of ETA1 = ETA2 vs ETA1 > ETA2 is significant at 0.0000 The test is significant at 0.0000 This is the ‘p’ value. See next slide for interpretation of ‘p’ values
  • 7.
    p value Interpretation >0.05The result of the test is not significant <0.05 With greater than 95% confidence the result is significant <0.01 With greater than 99% confidence the result is significant <0.001 With greater than 99.9% confidence the result is significant • Therefore it can be said that with greater than 99.9% confidence, the Environmental Quality Scores for Quinton are significantly higher than those for Ladywood.
  • 8.
    Census Data Summarise whatthe bar charts showed in terms of socio-economic indicators? • For all of the indicators of wealth - Owner Occupied - 2 or more cars - Employed - Mngmnt/ Prof occupations Quinton has a higher % than Ladywood and in most cases the average for Birmingham • For all of the indicators of deprivation - Social rented - 0 cars - Unemployed - No Qualifications Ladywood has a higher % than Quinton and in most cases the average for Birmingham
  • 9.
    Police Crime Data Describeand justify how you used measurements of Central Tendency ( averages) to analyse your data. What did the results of these measurements show? Describe and Justify the use of Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) data. What did the overlap of the IQR for different data sets show? Describe and Justify the use of the Mann Whitney U Test. What did the results of this show? YOU need to do this bit on your own!! Use Minitab to complete the Mann Whitney U Test – see next slides for help Great! I love doing statistics
  • 13.
    Step 4. Phew ! Anothersection complete