Many Americans have proposed replacing the federal income tax with national retail sales tax. This would allow the government to levy a flat rate tax on retail sales thereby taxing consumer spending indiscriminately.
The document contains 5 letters to the editor advocating for tax reform and the FairTax plan. The letters argue that the current tax system is too complex, confusing and unfair. It hides taxes in higher prices. The FairTax would replace the current tax system with a national sales tax, ensuring people take home their full paychecks. Supporters say it would make the US more competitive, benefit the middle class and eliminate tax anxiety.
Overview of the advertising tax, how it affects affiliates, origins in New York, the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Supreme Court decision, how affiliates can take action, states where there is currently activity, and resources for the latest on the advertising tax.
The document discusses several policy proposals to address economic issues and promote renewable energy. It suggests fixing labor laws to allow more flexible work from home arrangements, providing portable healthcare not tied to employment, shifting to individually purchased health insurance with tax credits for families and individuals, increasing research funding for chronic diseases, and providing tax incentives for corporations to lower emissions through cap-and-trade systems for renewable energy.
Steven Rattner testified before the Senate Finance Committee on the need for tax reform. He argued that the tax code has deteriorated without reform in over 30 years, allowing lawyers and accountants to legally ease tax burdens for their wealthy clients. For example, the 400 highest income Americans saw their tax rate drop from 30% to 17% from 1995 to 2012 due largely to low capital gains and dividend rates. Rattner advocated achieving greater fairness and revenue by reducing the number of tax rates, eliminating special treatment of capital gains and dividends, and reducing loopholes that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
This article was written by Natasha Sarin, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy,
and was posted on the US Department of the Treasury website on October 14, 2021.
This document summarizes and rebuts five common "lies" or misconceptions about taxes in the United States. The first is that tax dollars are wasted by government. However, taxes fund important and popular services like Social Security, infrastructure, and national defense. Second, it is a myth that cutting taxes increases revenue; in reality, tax cuts typically decrease revenue. Third, not half of Americans avoid taxes altogether as some claim, since most pay other taxes besides income tax. Fourth, US citizens are not overtaxed compared to history or other developed nations. Fifth, the perception that taxes are too high may stem from effective anti-tax rhetoric and public ignorance about tax rates and spending.
Should You Care About the Billionaire Tax?InvestingTips
There is a sense today that the richest among us are not paying their fair share of taxes as a proportion of their wealth. Thus the idea of a billionaire tax that would only apply to about 400 people has come to pass. Since the odds are pretty good, dear reader, that you are not one of the 400, should you care about the billionaire tax?
https://youtu.be/l9b4bQl5oVY
The document contains 5 letters to the editor advocating for tax reform and the FairTax plan. The letters argue that the current tax system is too complex, confusing and unfair. It hides taxes in higher prices. The FairTax would replace the current tax system with a national sales tax, ensuring people take home their full paychecks. Supporters say it would make the US more competitive, benefit the middle class and eliminate tax anxiety.
Overview of the advertising tax, how it affects affiliates, origins in New York, the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Supreme Court decision, how affiliates can take action, states where there is currently activity, and resources for the latest on the advertising tax.
The document discusses several policy proposals to address economic issues and promote renewable energy. It suggests fixing labor laws to allow more flexible work from home arrangements, providing portable healthcare not tied to employment, shifting to individually purchased health insurance with tax credits for families and individuals, increasing research funding for chronic diseases, and providing tax incentives for corporations to lower emissions through cap-and-trade systems for renewable energy.
Steven Rattner testified before the Senate Finance Committee on the need for tax reform. He argued that the tax code has deteriorated without reform in over 30 years, allowing lawyers and accountants to legally ease tax burdens for their wealthy clients. For example, the 400 highest income Americans saw their tax rate drop from 30% to 17% from 1995 to 2012 due largely to low capital gains and dividend rates. Rattner advocated achieving greater fairness and revenue by reducing the number of tax rates, eliminating special treatment of capital gains and dividends, and reducing loopholes that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
This article was written by Natasha Sarin, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy,
and was posted on the US Department of the Treasury website on October 14, 2021.
This document summarizes and rebuts five common "lies" or misconceptions about taxes in the United States. The first is that tax dollars are wasted by government. However, taxes fund important and popular services like Social Security, infrastructure, and national defense. Second, it is a myth that cutting taxes increases revenue; in reality, tax cuts typically decrease revenue. Third, not half of Americans avoid taxes altogether as some claim, since most pay other taxes besides income tax. Fourth, US citizens are not overtaxed compared to history or other developed nations. Fifth, the perception that taxes are too high may stem from effective anti-tax rhetoric and public ignorance about tax rates and spending.
Should You Care About the Billionaire Tax?InvestingTips
There is a sense today that the richest among us are not paying their fair share of taxes as a proportion of their wealth. Thus the idea of a billionaire tax that would only apply to about 400 people has come to pass. Since the odds are pretty good, dear reader, that you are not one of the 400, should you care about the billionaire tax?
https://youtu.be/l9b4bQl5oVY
The document discusses the financial crisis and responses to it. It argues that government policy mistakes led to the crisis and that bailouts will not solve it. Keynesian economic policies like increased spending and stimulus plans will not work and instead will lead to higher long-term government spending and taxation that hinders growth. The ideal approach is to limit government's role to core functions, lower taxes broadly, and let markets correct problems without intervention.
This State Factor examines the relationship between state tax policies and charitable giving. It summarizes research finding that higher state taxes are associated with lower levels of charitable giving. Specifically, a 1 percentage point increase in state income tax burden is associated with a 0.35% decrease in charitable donations per dollar of state income. The document discusses the important role of charitable organizations in addressing social issues and argues they are often more effective than government programs in providing services due to greater flexibility and accountability from relying on voluntary donations rather than tax funds. It maintains that state policies should consider how to encourage charitable giving."
This document summarizes a report by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) on the costs of tax cronyism. It defines tax cronyism as using tax policy to benefit specific firms or industries rather than having broadly applicable, neutral tax rules. The report argues that tax cronyism stifles competition and economic growth. It suggests eliminating tax cronyism through revenue-neutral tax reforms or increased transparency and analysis of such policies to ensure they create economic growth beyond their costs. The report estimates that tax carve-outs in the US total around $488 billion annually but notes tax cronyism is difficult to quantify fully due to lack of transparency.
Economists See Clouds in the Silver LiningYardi Matrix
Download the full report: https://goo.gl/5jwDS5
At a time when optimism is rampant in the real estate industry, and the stock market is near all-time highs after a massive run-up, economists lived up to their billing as dismal scientists at the National Association of Business Economists (NABE) annual policy conference in Washington, D.C., last week.
Although the immediate state of the economy is healthy, economists lamented the country’s long-term fiscal situation, recently made worse by the tax reform passed by Congress. They were also pessimistic about the prospects for policy solutions, which include prudent immigration reform and fewer—not more—restrictions on global trade, given the growing populism that is producing an electorate with increasingly polarized views in the U.S. and Europe.
“I’m concerned that the political system has not come to grips with sensible fiscal policy,” said Alice Rivlin, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.
The Great Rightward Shift: How Conservatism Shifted the Money to the 1%David Doney
The document discusses how conservative economic policies since 1980 have contributed to increasing income and wealth inequality in the United States. It notes that the top 1% now receive over 20% of income, versus 10% pre-1980, and own 42% of wealth compared to 24% in the mid-1970s. Conservative policies such as tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy 1% and weakening of unions have shifted more of the economic gains to the top earners over the past several decades. The rise of conservative media has also encouraged working-class voters to support policies that are not in their own economic interests.
The New York Thruway Authority has been cancelling and rescheduling meetings to approve a proposed 45% toll increase on trucks without public notice, highlighting the need for reform. Assemblyman Tony Jordan introduced a bill that would require legislative approval for regulatory agency decisions with fiscal impacts over $5 million statewide to increase transparency and accountability of public authorities like the Thruway Authority. The toll hike would hurt businesses and families by increasing costs of consumer goods.
Jason Cohen - Comprehensive Exam PresentationJason A. Cohen
This policy analysis examines capital gains tax policy in the United States. It discusses how capital gains are currently taxed at 20% for long-term gains. The document proposes establishing a progressive, four-tier tax structure for capital gains with rates ranging from 0% to 33.8% depending on income level. It outlines the process for setting the agenda, formulating the policy change, gaining legitimacy, implementing the new law, budgeting the revenue, and evaluating the impact on tax collections and economic growth over 10 years. The goal is to educate the public and policymakers on alternatives to the current system.
Heritage Foundation economist Rea S. Hederman Jr. explores the differences between pro-growth tax policy and progressive tax policy. He made this presentation at an event sponsored by the Naples Committee for Heritage on October 22, 2009.
The document discusses ways that some people avoid paying state income taxes by establishing residency in states without income taxes like Florida. It notes that establishing a mailbox at a private mail center, opening a bank account with that address, getting a driver's license and registering a vehicle and bills there can be used to claim residency in Florida instead of one's home state. It also compares the maximum state income tax rates of Georgia and neighboring states, noting Florida has none while Georgia's is 6%, which could influence retirement decisions.
Dave Rocker: Tax reform is difficult but effective if done rightDave Rocker
The real goal of tax reform should be to reduce the nation's debt as a percentage of GDP. Cuts for the sake of cuts will lead to short term wins but long-term calamity.
The document discusses Massachusetts state budget shortfalls and potential options to close a $5.4 billion gap. It notes that 73% of state spending goes to education, local aid, healthcare, and human services. Even eliminating all state human services agencies or education spending would not close the full gap. Potential revenue generators discussed include closing tax loopholes, increasing various taxes by 1% including the corporate tax, gas tax, meals and hotel taxes, and income and sales taxes. Raising property taxes is also mentioned but impacts would depend on location.
The document summarizes key points from a report on declining economic freedom in the United States. It finds that the U.S. has fallen out of the top 10 in economic freedom rankings due to rising government spending and debt, increased regulations, and a growing perception of cronyism. Specifically, it notes increases in government spending, high corporate tax rates, excessive regulations, a complex tax code, and experimental monetary policy as areas negatively impacting the U.S. economic freedom score. The report argues that restoring economic freedom through reduced government intervention and spending is needed to boost economic growth and opportunity.
This document summarizes how taxing wealthy individuals is changing globally due to increased scrutiny and enforcement efforts. Key points include:
- Media leaks of offshore bank accounts in 2013 triggered public outrage and government actions to target tax evasion by the wealthy.
- Since 2010, governments have increased taxes on high-income individuals through higher income tax rates, reducing tax relief on pensions, taxing dividends, introducing wealth taxes, and increasing taxes on inheritances and property.
- International cooperation on exchanging taxpayer information and enforcement efforts like the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act have reduced banking secrecy and increased disclosure requirements.
This document compares individual income taxes, corporate income taxes, sales taxes, and property taxes between Pennsylvania and Mississippi. For individual income taxes, Pennsylvania has a flat 3.07% rate while Mississippi has a graduated rate of 3-5%. Both states exempt certain items from sales tax, with Pennsylvania's rate at 6% and Mississippi's at 7%. Pennsylvania collects higher average property taxes than Mississippi. The document also notes certain tax laws and loopholes in each state and poses questions for discussion.
How Much Tax Money Can States Get from Legalized Marijuana?Cannabis News
The document discusses how much tax revenue states can realistically expect to generate from legalizing marijuana. It notes that while states like Colorado and California have generated billions in cannabis sales, high tax rates in California have contributed to a large black market. The author argues that states should keep marijuana tax rates low to avoid driving consumers to the illegal market and maximize tax revenues. Lower taxes in Colorado have helped it establish a strong legal cannabis industry with hundreds of millions in annual tax revenues.
Alert to homeowners: a property tax hike may be in your future | Represent!mindlessnosh9294
Property taxes in Los Angeles County are projected to increase by 4% in the upcoming fiscal year, bringing in an additional $164 million for the county. This is due to rising home values across the state leading to higher property tax assessments and revenues for cities and counties. While some counties saw larger drops in home values during the recession and may see slower recovery, LA County CEO Bill Fujioka predicts a 7% rise in property tax revenues as about 345,000 homes in the county were reassessed with slightly higher values than their previous base assessments. The increased tax revenues will provide more funding for services like social programs. However, some economists warn that areas like Riverside County that saw more foreclosures may see a slower recovery
The US government has begun cracking down on American companies relocating overseas for tax purposes in a move known as corporate tax inversion. The most recent high profile case of tax inversion is that of US fast food giant Burger King buying Canadian donut company Tim Horton’s. Burger King plans to relocate all of its head office divisions, including taxes and finances, north of the border. This kind of tax inversion works when a US based business merges with or is acquired by a foreign company based in a country with a lower tax rate.
The Obama administration has not commented specifically on the Burger King case. However, it has outlined new rules to stop U.S. companies from doing exactly what Burger King has done, in order to avoid paying taxes in the United States. The Treasury Department has outlined new rules which will make these corporate inversions less attractive to US companies wishing to move their tax operations overseas. The new rules will ban techniques, no matter how creative , that companies often use to try to cut their tax bills. Tighter regulations are intended to make it harder for US companies to be ‘foreign’ owned in the first place, thereby ensuring that US companies are owned by US operators and paying taxes in the U.S.
The U.S. Treasury Secretary, Jacob Lew, told Canadian news site CBC that the aim of these new regulations is to put the brakes on the amount of companies that are able to escape paying taxes in the USA. Subsequently the idea of moving out of the country will no longer be a more lucrative option for those businesses. Burger King, after its high profile takeover of Tim Horton’s, has refuted claims that their takeover was purely for tax purposes, and has pointed to the tax history of both companies, stating that they paid virtually identical tax rates in the last fiscal year.
President Obama has praised the Treasury for its plans, and has spoken of his desire to close any loopholes that companies find to avoid paying their taxes in the U.S. He is also supporting a possible further tax reform which would reduce the corporate tax rate, close any other loopholes that businesses find, and make tax codes and rates simpler for U.S. based corporations.
Burger King and Tim Horton’s, however, do not expect these new rules to affect their merger, which is moving ahead at full speed.
The income gap between college graduates and individuals without a college education has never been wider. According to one estimate, A college educated person stands to earn $570,000 more throughout their lifetime than an individual with only a high school diploma. The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently reported that the unemployment rate for 25-year-olds without a degree is more than double the unemployment rate for college graduates of the same age. But in order to reap the economic rewards of a college education, many Americans must first find a way to afford one. That means working through a system of educational tax credits and student loans. But is this system really achieving it's goal of making college more accessible?
The document discusses the financial crisis and responses to it. It argues that government policy mistakes led to the crisis and that bailouts will not solve it. Keynesian economic policies like increased spending and stimulus plans will not work and instead will lead to higher long-term government spending and taxation that hinders growth. The ideal approach is to limit government's role to core functions, lower taxes broadly, and let markets correct problems without intervention.
This State Factor examines the relationship between state tax policies and charitable giving. It summarizes research finding that higher state taxes are associated with lower levels of charitable giving. Specifically, a 1 percentage point increase in state income tax burden is associated with a 0.35% decrease in charitable donations per dollar of state income. The document discusses the important role of charitable organizations in addressing social issues and argues they are often more effective than government programs in providing services due to greater flexibility and accountability from relying on voluntary donations rather than tax funds. It maintains that state policies should consider how to encourage charitable giving."
This document summarizes a report by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) on the costs of tax cronyism. It defines tax cronyism as using tax policy to benefit specific firms or industries rather than having broadly applicable, neutral tax rules. The report argues that tax cronyism stifles competition and economic growth. It suggests eliminating tax cronyism through revenue-neutral tax reforms or increased transparency and analysis of such policies to ensure they create economic growth beyond their costs. The report estimates that tax carve-outs in the US total around $488 billion annually but notes tax cronyism is difficult to quantify fully due to lack of transparency.
Economists See Clouds in the Silver LiningYardi Matrix
Download the full report: https://goo.gl/5jwDS5
At a time when optimism is rampant in the real estate industry, and the stock market is near all-time highs after a massive run-up, economists lived up to their billing as dismal scientists at the National Association of Business Economists (NABE) annual policy conference in Washington, D.C., last week.
Although the immediate state of the economy is healthy, economists lamented the country’s long-term fiscal situation, recently made worse by the tax reform passed by Congress. They were also pessimistic about the prospects for policy solutions, which include prudent immigration reform and fewer—not more—restrictions on global trade, given the growing populism that is producing an electorate with increasingly polarized views in the U.S. and Europe.
“I’m concerned that the political system has not come to grips with sensible fiscal policy,” said Alice Rivlin, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.
The Great Rightward Shift: How Conservatism Shifted the Money to the 1%David Doney
The document discusses how conservative economic policies since 1980 have contributed to increasing income and wealth inequality in the United States. It notes that the top 1% now receive over 20% of income, versus 10% pre-1980, and own 42% of wealth compared to 24% in the mid-1970s. Conservative policies such as tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy 1% and weakening of unions have shifted more of the economic gains to the top earners over the past several decades. The rise of conservative media has also encouraged working-class voters to support policies that are not in their own economic interests.
The New York Thruway Authority has been cancelling and rescheduling meetings to approve a proposed 45% toll increase on trucks without public notice, highlighting the need for reform. Assemblyman Tony Jordan introduced a bill that would require legislative approval for regulatory agency decisions with fiscal impacts over $5 million statewide to increase transparency and accountability of public authorities like the Thruway Authority. The toll hike would hurt businesses and families by increasing costs of consumer goods.
Jason Cohen - Comprehensive Exam PresentationJason A. Cohen
This policy analysis examines capital gains tax policy in the United States. It discusses how capital gains are currently taxed at 20% for long-term gains. The document proposes establishing a progressive, four-tier tax structure for capital gains with rates ranging from 0% to 33.8% depending on income level. It outlines the process for setting the agenda, formulating the policy change, gaining legitimacy, implementing the new law, budgeting the revenue, and evaluating the impact on tax collections and economic growth over 10 years. The goal is to educate the public and policymakers on alternatives to the current system.
Heritage Foundation economist Rea S. Hederman Jr. explores the differences between pro-growth tax policy and progressive tax policy. He made this presentation at an event sponsored by the Naples Committee for Heritage on October 22, 2009.
The document discusses ways that some people avoid paying state income taxes by establishing residency in states without income taxes like Florida. It notes that establishing a mailbox at a private mail center, opening a bank account with that address, getting a driver's license and registering a vehicle and bills there can be used to claim residency in Florida instead of one's home state. It also compares the maximum state income tax rates of Georgia and neighboring states, noting Florida has none while Georgia's is 6%, which could influence retirement decisions.
Dave Rocker: Tax reform is difficult but effective if done rightDave Rocker
The real goal of tax reform should be to reduce the nation's debt as a percentage of GDP. Cuts for the sake of cuts will lead to short term wins but long-term calamity.
The document discusses Massachusetts state budget shortfalls and potential options to close a $5.4 billion gap. It notes that 73% of state spending goes to education, local aid, healthcare, and human services. Even eliminating all state human services agencies or education spending would not close the full gap. Potential revenue generators discussed include closing tax loopholes, increasing various taxes by 1% including the corporate tax, gas tax, meals and hotel taxes, and income and sales taxes. Raising property taxes is also mentioned but impacts would depend on location.
The document summarizes key points from a report on declining economic freedom in the United States. It finds that the U.S. has fallen out of the top 10 in economic freedom rankings due to rising government spending and debt, increased regulations, and a growing perception of cronyism. Specifically, it notes increases in government spending, high corporate tax rates, excessive regulations, a complex tax code, and experimental monetary policy as areas negatively impacting the U.S. economic freedom score. The report argues that restoring economic freedom through reduced government intervention and spending is needed to boost economic growth and opportunity.
This document summarizes how taxing wealthy individuals is changing globally due to increased scrutiny and enforcement efforts. Key points include:
- Media leaks of offshore bank accounts in 2013 triggered public outrage and government actions to target tax evasion by the wealthy.
- Since 2010, governments have increased taxes on high-income individuals through higher income tax rates, reducing tax relief on pensions, taxing dividends, introducing wealth taxes, and increasing taxes on inheritances and property.
- International cooperation on exchanging taxpayer information and enforcement efforts like the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act have reduced banking secrecy and increased disclosure requirements.
This document compares individual income taxes, corporate income taxes, sales taxes, and property taxes between Pennsylvania and Mississippi. For individual income taxes, Pennsylvania has a flat 3.07% rate while Mississippi has a graduated rate of 3-5%. Both states exempt certain items from sales tax, with Pennsylvania's rate at 6% and Mississippi's at 7%. Pennsylvania collects higher average property taxes than Mississippi. The document also notes certain tax laws and loopholes in each state and poses questions for discussion.
How Much Tax Money Can States Get from Legalized Marijuana?Cannabis News
The document discusses how much tax revenue states can realistically expect to generate from legalizing marijuana. It notes that while states like Colorado and California have generated billions in cannabis sales, high tax rates in California have contributed to a large black market. The author argues that states should keep marijuana tax rates low to avoid driving consumers to the illegal market and maximize tax revenues. Lower taxes in Colorado have helped it establish a strong legal cannabis industry with hundreds of millions in annual tax revenues.
Alert to homeowners: a property tax hike may be in your future | Represent!mindlessnosh9294
Property taxes in Los Angeles County are projected to increase by 4% in the upcoming fiscal year, bringing in an additional $164 million for the county. This is due to rising home values across the state leading to higher property tax assessments and revenues for cities and counties. While some counties saw larger drops in home values during the recession and may see slower recovery, LA County CEO Bill Fujioka predicts a 7% rise in property tax revenues as about 345,000 homes in the county were reassessed with slightly higher values than their previous base assessments. The increased tax revenues will provide more funding for services like social programs. However, some economists warn that areas like Riverside County that saw more foreclosures may see a slower recovery
The US government has begun cracking down on American companies relocating overseas for tax purposes in a move known as corporate tax inversion. The most recent high profile case of tax inversion is that of US fast food giant Burger King buying Canadian donut company Tim Horton’s. Burger King plans to relocate all of its head office divisions, including taxes and finances, north of the border. This kind of tax inversion works when a US based business merges with or is acquired by a foreign company based in a country with a lower tax rate.
The Obama administration has not commented specifically on the Burger King case. However, it has outlined new rules to stop U.S. companies from doing exactly what Burger King has done, in order to avoid paying taxes in the United States. The Treasury Department has outlined new rules which will make these corporate inversions less attractive to US companies wishing to move their tax operations overseas. The new rules will ban techniques, no matter how creative , that companies often use to try to cut their tax bills. Tighter regulations are intended to make it harder for US companies to be ‘foreign’ owned in the first place, thereby ensuring that US companies are owned by US operators and paying taxes in the U.S.
The U.S. Treasury Secretary, Jacob Lew, told Canadian news site CBC that the aim of these new regulations is to put the brakes on the amount of companies that are able to escape paying taxes in the USA. Subsequently the idea of moving out of the country will no longer be a more lucrative option for those businesses. Burger King, after its high profile takeover of Tim Horton’s, has refuted claims that their takeover was purely for tax purposes, and has pointed to the tax history of both companies, stating that they paid virtually identical tax rates in the last fiscal year.
President Obama has praised the Treasury for its plans, and has spoken of his desire to close any loopholes that companies find to avoid paying their taxes in the U.S. He is also supporting a possible further tax reform which would reduce the corporate tax rate, close any other loopholes that businesses find, and make tax codes and rates simpler for U.S. based corporations.
Burger King and Tim Horton’s, however, do not expect these new rules to affect their merger, which is moving ahead at full speed.
The income gap between college graduates and individuals without a college education has never been wider. According to one estimate, A college educated person stands to earn $570,000 more throughout their lifetime than an individual with only a high school diploma. The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently reported that the unemployment rate for 25-year-olds without a degree is more than double the unemployment rate for college graduates of the same age. But in order to reap the economic rewards of a college education, many Americans must first find a way to afford one. That means working through a system of educational tax credits and student loans. But is this system really achieving it's goal of making college more accessible?
El documento describe una experiencia educativa llamada "Picasso en nuestras aulas" que tiene como objetivo familiarizar a los estudiantes con las obras del pintor Pablo Picasso de forma lúdica y creativa. La experiencia incluye actividades como la creación de una biografía de Picasso utilizando fotografías y libros, una visita al Museo Picasso de Málaga, y talleres donde los estudiantes pueden crear sus propias obras de arte inspiradas en el estilo de Picasso. El enfoque principal es fomentar la creatividad, la
This document discusses identity and globalization. It explores how identities are based on complex experiences like family, language, ethnicity, and community. It also examines how art can celebrate and reinforce aspects of community identity. While identities may be locally based, art allows them to take on global significance as local ideas and concepts reach international audiences. The document considers examples of indigenous art from Australia, Polynesia, and China that have gained prominence on the global stage.
The document discusses plans to advertise a new protein supplement. It will include a radio advertisement and web pop-ups. Research was conducted on effective advertising techniques using media concepts. The advertising will target fit individuals and provide consumers a reason to choose the product. Potential broadcast channels and social networks for the ad were considered. The document concludes key lessons learned around effective advertising and developing ideas based on available resources.
The document discusses plans to advertise a new protein supplement for bodybuilders. Research was conducted on effective advertising techniques using media concepts and previous supplement ads. The advertising package includes a radio spot and web pop-ups. Social networks and specific channels were identified as venues to reach the target audience. Creating high quality ads requires analyzing available resources and finding suitable models. Ideas were generated for slogans and branding to promote the product.
Este documento contiene una serie de adivinanzas con pistas sobre objetos, animales y otros elementos. Cada adivinanza viene acompañada de un signo de interrogación que indica que hay que adivinar la respuesta. Algunas de las adivinanzas resueltas son tren, ave, letra A, papelera, estrellas, paso de cebra, letra O, semáforo, mesa, mono, lengua, silla, tomate, taza, tortuga, dedos, dientes y nubes.
This document provides information about a course on identity, including contact details for the lecturer, class times, assessment details, and required readings and resources. Students are expected to submit their first assignment, an illustrated written piece on their identities, by March 15th. The document also shares examples of artworks addressing themes of self-portraits and identity, including works by Ema Tavola, Albrecht Dürer, Kazimir Malevich, and Frida Kahlo. Concepts around reflexive identity from sociologist Anthony Giddens are discussed.
Este documento presenta un examen logopédico de la articulación que evalúa la producción de fonemas en diferentes posiciones dentro de las palabras. Incluye listas de palabras para evaluar consonantes individuales, grupos consonánticos, y vocales dentro de sílabas. El objetivo es identificar posibles errores o dificultades en la articulación de los sonidos del habla.
Chapter1Introduction to Federal Taxation and Understanding theJinElias52
Chapter
1
Introduction to Federal Taxation and Understanding the Federal Tax Law
OBJECTIVES
After completing Chapter 1, you should be able to:
1. Identify types of taxes used by federal and state governments to raise revenues.
2. Understand the methods of tax collection and the trends shown by tax collection statistics.
3. Differentiate between tax avoidance and tax evasion.
4. Recall the underlying rationale of the federal income tax and its historical development.
5. Describe the route a tax bill takes until enacted into law.
6. Define the basic tax concepts and terms of federal income taxation.
INTRODUCTION
Federal taxation is the fuel by which Americans power their “Ship of State.” The tax structure which supports our federal government has gone from quill and ink records of revolutionary assessments to lightning speed computers which calculate and validate millions of income tax returns submitted by individuals and corporations. Federal taxes, in addition to the income tax, include a variety of other taxes covering estates, gifts, and customs, as well as excise taxes, and other minor categories of tax. Our governments can thus select among a variety of tax alternatives to produce the revenues required to operate national programs and carry out national policies.
Taxes are big business. Unfortunately, many business decisions are made in the United States today without regard to federal tax consequences. Individuals are concerned with personal income tax decisions and gift and estate tax decisions, while corporations concern themselves with corporate taxes, personal holding company taxes, and accumulated earnings tax decisions. Further, businesspersons must concern themselves with the choice of business entity: corporation, partnership, or S corporation. Differences in tax costs can be considerable. Advantages and disadvantages are virtually unlimited. This book presents information which is required knowledge if you make business decisions.
While most businesspersons (and many advisors) think about how to make decisions in nontax terms, the tax accountant bears the burden of introducing tax considerations. The topics presented in this book must be viewed in terms of decision-making—therefore, tax planning and tax research are of the utmost importance. Tax decisions are not made in a vacuum. Lawyers, accountants, financial managers, and a host of other experts work as a team in the decision-making process. This book is intended to serve as a guide for accounting students and for MBA students interested in gaining insight into and expertise in the tax complexities of business decision-making.
OVERVIEW
This chapter presents information on the magnitude of federal taxes collected and on taxpayer obligations. Then, a brief historical account is presented of federal tax collections prior to and after the adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which enabled Congress to levy “taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived.” Foll ...
Repond to stsudent. This was there answer. I need you to respond to .docxpearlenehodge
Repond to stsudent. This was there answer. I need you to respond to what they have wrote. Respond in 200 words.
1.
The main types of taxes used to fund the public sector include income taxes, payroll taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and excise taxes. While other taxes exist, these five types of taxes are the most prominent and generate the majority of revenue used to fund the public sector.
The Federal Government raises the majority of its revenue from the combination of income taxes, payroll taxes, and excise taxes. These taxes raised approximately 94.1% of federal tax revenue in 2013 (Miller, 2016, p. 134). Corporate income taxes generate additional cost to the producer which must be passed on to the consumer in order to generate profits. Individual income taxes reduce the amount of capital the consumer has to spend. Payroll taxes are shared equally by both the producer, in this case the employer, and the consumer; however, the real cost is passed on to the consumer in the form of reduced wages (Miller, 2016, p. 135). Finally, excise taxes are levied on the product and must be paid by the producer. Ultimately, the consumer is affected by the higher price and ends up paying a portion of this tax.
State and Local Governments raise their tax revenue, which accounted for 47.4% of total revenue, from sales taxes, property taxes, and income taxes (Miller, 2016, p. 134). Sales taxes affect mainly the consumer. The additional cost is not passed on to the producer. Property taxes are assessed on the value of property owned. The consumer bears the burden of these taxes, and as a result, there are residual effects on producers due to a lower demand for high value items. The impact of income taxes is the same for the producer and consumer as discussed in the preceding paragraph.
2.
The government finds numerous ways to fund governmental operations through taxing at a federal, state and local level. There are many types of taxes excised at each level of government. The most well- known tax is arguably the federal income tax, although most states also collect income tax. Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming do not collect state income tax (Kahn, 2015) In the United States the income tax is progressive, meaning that as the taxpayer earns more money the tax rate raises. In effect, those who make the least money pay the lowest taxes proportionally whereas those earning the most pay the largest amount proportionally. Regressive and proportional taxes are other types of income taxes. A regressive tax has those making the least money paying the highest proportionally and the highest earning paying the least. A proportional tax, also called a flat tax, has all taxpayers paying the same proportion of their income.
The federal government also collects Social Security, or FICA tax, medicare tax, capital gains taxes, and corporate taxes. The tax burden of some of these are spilt between the employee and the employer. .
The document discusses corporate income tax in the United States. It makes three key points:
1) Corporate income tax is one of the highest sources of federal revenue in the US, providing crucial funding for programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
2) Contrary to popular belief, there is no flat tax rate for corporations - the marginal tax rate can vary significantly between 15-35%.
3) Past attempts to significantly cut the corporate tax rate, like under Ronald Reagan, have resulted in higher inflation and interest rates rather than job growth as intended. Cutting taxes ended in disaster for the US economy.
This document summarizes and advocates for the FairTax plan, which would abolish all federal income taxes and replace them with a 23% national sales tax. It argues that the current tax system is overly complex, discourages work and economic growth. The FairTax would be simple, transparent and visible to taxpayers. It would tax consumption and ensure low-income households pay no taxes on basic necessities through a monthly tax rebate. Supporters believe the FairTax would boost the economy, make U.S. products more competitive, and generate the same tax revenue as the current system in a more efficient manner.
The document discusses proposed legislation in Colorado that would eliminate various business tax credits and exemptions, generating $145 million in additional tax revenue for the state. The bills are aimed at addressing Colorado's $1 billion budget shortfall but are worrying small business owners who fear they will be overburdened. While supporters say the bills target loopholes and special interests, critics argue the bills will hurt innovation, job creation, and small businesses.
Respond to student. This was there answer. I need you to respond t.docxronak56
Respond to student. This was there answer. I need you to respond to what they have wrote. Respond in 200 words.
ECON CLASS-JEN
1.
The main types of taxes used to fund the public sector include income taxes, payroll taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and excise taxes. While other taxes exist, these five types of taxes are the most prominent and generate the majority of revenue used to fund the public sector.
The Federal Government raises the majority of its revenue from the combination of income taxes, payroll taxes, and excise taxes. These taxes raised approximately 94.1% of federal tax revenue in 2013 (Miller, 2016, p. 134). Corporate income taxes generate additional cost to the producer which must be passed on to the consumer in order to generate profits. Individual income taxes reduce the amount of capital the consumer has to spend. Payroll taxes are shared equally by both the producer, in this case the employer, and the consumer; however, the real cost is passed on to the consumer in the form of reduced wages (Miller, 2016, p. 135). Finally, excise taxes are levied on the product and must be paid by the producer. Ultimately, the consumer is affected by the higher price and ends up paying a portion of this tax.
State and Local Governments raise their tax revenue, which accounted for 47.4% of total revenue, from sales taxes, property taxes, and income taxes (Miller, 2016, p. 134). Sales taxes affect mainly the consumer. The additional cost is not passed on to the producer. Property taxes are assessed on the value of property owned. The consumer bears the burden of these taxes, and as a result, there are residual effects on producers due to a lower demand for high value items. The impact of income taxes is the same for the producer and consumer as discussed in the preceding paragraph.
2.
The government finds numerous ways to fund governmental operations through taxing at a federal, state and local level. There are many types of taxes excised at each level of government. The most well- known tax is arguably the federal income tax, although most states also collect income tax. Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming do not collect state income tax (Kahn, 2015) In the United States the income tax is progressive, meaning that as the taxpayer earns more money the tax rate raises. In effect, those who make the least money pay the lowest taxes proportionally whereas those earning the most pay the largest amount proportionally. Regressive and proportional taxes are other types of income taxes. A regressive tax has those making the least money paying the highest proportionally and the highest earning paying the least. A proportional tax, also called a flat tax, has all taxpayers paying the same proportion of their income.
The federal government also collects Social Security, or FICA tax, medicare tax, capital gains taxes, and corporate taxes. The tax burden of some of these are spilt between the employee ...
1. The document discusses corporate and individual income taxes in the United States, including tax rates, tax brackets, and the debate around taxing the wealthy.
2. It provides examples of tax rates and calculations for various investments, bonds, and dividends.
3. The debate around increasing taxes on the top 1% is examined, with arguments on both sides discussed around whether the wealthy pay their fair share or should contribute more in taxes.
This document provides an overview and outline of topics covered in Chapter 6 on funding the public sector, including:
1) Governments have three main sources of funding: taxes, fees, and borrowing. There is a limit to government spending based on tax revenues.
2) The chapter discusses different tax systems and the most important federal taxes like income tax, corporate tax, and payroll taxes. It also examines how tax rates impact tax revenues.
3) Setting tax rates involves considering both static analyses, which assume tax bases remain fixed, and dynamic analyses, which recognize higher rates may reduce tax bases and eventually tax revenues.
Governments use taxes to raise revenue and redistribute income through spending on public goods and services. The degree of redistribution depends on the type and progressivity of taxes. Progressive taxes place a higher burden on higher incomes, making them redistributive. Regressive taxes like indirect taxes place a higher burden on lower incomes. There are differing views on the appropriate role of taxes. Supply-side views favor lower taxes to incentivize work and investment, while demand-side views see taxes as a tool to manage the economy and achieve fairness.
The document analyzes the potential impact of the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA) on consumers and state tax revenues. It summarizes two studies that estimate MFA could increase annual state and local sales tax revenues by $3-23 billion by requiring online and catalog retailers to collect sales taxes. The document then estimates MFA would increase the total sales tax burden on US households by $30-34 billion annually or $300-340 billion over 10 years. Finally, it provides state-by-state estimates of how MFA could increase sales tax burdens from 1.2%-16.2% depending on the state.
Respond to the student, needs to be 200 words each. ECON CLASS1..docxronak56
Respond to the student, needs to be 200 words each. ECON CLASS
1.
The Department of Treasury references three specific taxes that affect both consumers and producers and fund the public sector.
The first is income tax, which is a tax based on the amount of income that an individual makes, as well as businesses, that are used to fund Federal programs such as unemployment and social security. Second is what is known as a consumption tax. This tax, used by State and Federal government, is for public items such as roads and mass transit systems and, in this example, are taken from gasoline taxes. Third is a property tax, that is paid monthly with a mortgage that assists in funding State public school systems and may include levies when the original property tax is not enough.
The effect of higher taxes, specifically income tax, can cause the consumer hesitation to become a homeowner thereby lowering the amount of taxes that the Federal government (the producer) bring in to fund needed public programs. There are things that bring the consumer back into the fold of homeownership by creating incentives, such as deductions in yearly taxes for owning a home and paying interest on a mortgage just to name a few. Consumers also have the “need” (want) to know where their hard earned money is going and it is important for individuals know that “most of the Federal Government's revenue comes from personal income taxes. Other sources of revenue include social security and other insurance taxes and contributions, corporate income taxes, excise taxes” ("Economics of Taxation", 2016).
2. In the U.S., taxes make up the largest source of revenue for the Federal Government. The tax code is extremely complicated and navigating through it can be a challenge for individual taxpayers and businesses alike. Taxes are collected at both the Federal and State levels. At the Federal level you have four major key taxes that are collected. They are Individual Income tax, Social Security tax, Corporate Income tax, and Excise taxes. The United States has a progressive tax system in that the percentage of tax owed by the individual increases as they move up in the tax bracket. The more an individual earns, the more of a percentage that the government taxes. Social Security tax is collected in a manner that is regressive in that the closer the individual gets to reaching the required amount of taxed income, the less their percentage of taxed income becomes. Corporate Income tax differs from individual income tax in that it is often factored on the amount of revenue earned by the business minus the costs. Excise taxes (which are also assessed at the State level) is a tax placed on a specific good before it reaches the consumer. The State collects four major taxes to account for its revenue aside from those monies brought in through revenue from the Federal government and user charges. These taxes include Sales tax, Property tax, Personal Income tax, and Corporate Income tax. For ...
Even staunch Republicans were shocked recently when ProPublica published secret IRS files showing that the richest Americans routinely pay a small fraction of their income in income taxes and in some years pay no taxes at all. Our concern is how efforts to regulate tax rates for the ultra rich will affect taxes on the average American taxpayer.
https://youtu.be/1ooTRnwiF2A
This presentation discusses how homeowners, businesses, and municipalities would benefit from a repeal of Indiana's proprty tax and presents a plan for accomplishing repeal.
The document discusses taxes and government spending at various levels of government. It explains that taxation is the primary way governments collect money to fund operations. The federal government's authority to tax comes from the Constitution and Congress has the power to levy taxes, subject to some limits. Federal taxes include individual and corporate income taxes, payroll taxes, excise taxes, estate and gift taxes. Federal spending goes towards entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare, as well as discretionary spending on defense, education, and more. State and local governments also collect taxes and create operating and capital budgets to fund their operations.
The document discusses America's growing debt problem and some potential solutions. It outlines several "hidden debt bombs" not captured in official debt figures, such as losses from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, unfunded promises for Social Security and Medicare, and reduced tax revenue from tax breaks. Some proposed solutions mentioned include raising the Social Security retirement age, reducing health insurance tax breaks, broadening the tax base, and considering new revenue options like a value-added tax.
Taxes impact the economy through their effects on resource allocation, consumer behavior, and national productivity and growth. Taxes are directly related to supply and demand and affect incentives to save, invest, and work. An effective tax system aims to be equitable, simple, and efficient while adhering to principles like benefit received and ability to pay. The U.S. federal government collects most of its tax revenue from individual income taxes, Social Security and Medicare taxes, corporate income taxes, and excise taxes. State governments rely heavily on intergovernmental transfers and sales taxes, while local governments' primary sources are also intergovernmental transfers and property taxes.
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
2. A Fundamental Tax Reform
Lawmakers and state officials have proposed a
fundamental tax reform that would replace federal
income tax with national retail sales tax.
Instead of imposing the highest amounts of taxes on
taxpayers’ earnings, the national sales tax would
focus more on what consumers spend.
The government would levy a flat rate tax on retail
sales that would tax consumer spending
indiscriminately.
3. Replacing a Broken System
An estimated $170 billion a year is spent on tax
filing.
This has prompted both Democrats and
Republicans to seek a shift in the US taxing
system.
Many argue that federal income tax results in
reduced productivity and decreased job
growth.
4. “Punishes the Productive”
Forbes contributor, David John Marotta writes that,
“[income tax] punishes the productive by taxing them the
highest amounts, reduces jobs by increasing the cost of
employees and reveals our personal finances and thus
invades our privacy.”
5. What Would Change?
Income tax is often seen as an invasion of the privacy
of taxpayers who succumb to corporate and
personal income taxes.
With the introduction of nationwide tax reform, the
Internal Revenue Service would be scaled down
substantially.
There would no longer be a need for taxpayers to
report fiscal earnings or other personal financial
information. It may also help to reduce fraudulent
reports caused by the retrieval of sensitive financial
information.
6. Sales Tax: Unfair to the Poor?
Critics of the national sales tax argue that the
tax would favor the rich because the poor
spend a higher percentage of their income per
year.
Wealthy individuals with a high standard of
living would still pay the most taxes since all
Americans would be taxed according their
spending habits.
7. Critics also warn that in some
states, sales tax would soar. “In 29 of
the 39 states with both sales taxes and
significant income taxes, current sales
tax rates would have to more than
double to replace revenue lost from
repealing state income taxes,” argues
tax analyst, Martin A. Sullivan.
8. Those in Favor…
Those in favor of national sales tax say it would encourage decrease spending and
reduce the price of goods by taxing consumption.
They also argue that Americans would begin saving and investing more due to deferred
consumption. “In 2014, the Treasury collected $1.7 trillion from corporate and personal
income taxes.
This could be replaced by a 12 percent sales tax on all private purchases,” says Peter
Morici, an economist at the University of Maryland.
Supporters of the sales tax like Morici believe that it would stimulate production of goods
as well as economic growth in the long run.