The document summarizes key points from a report on declining economic freedom in the United States. It finds that the U.S. has fallen out of the top 10 in economic freedom rankings due to rising government spending and debt, increased regulations, and a growing perception of cronyism. Specifically, it notes increases in government spending, high corporate tax rates, excessive regulations, a complex tax code, and experimental monetary policy as areas negatively impacting the U.S. economic freedom score. The report argues that restoring economic freedom through reduced government intervention and spending is needed to boost economic growth and opportunity.
The document discusses the financial crisis and responses to it. It argues that government policy mistakes led to the crisis and that bailouts will not solve it. Keynesian economic policies like increased spending and stimulus plans will not work and instead will lead to higher long-term government spending and taxation that hinders growth. The ideal approach is to limit government's role to core functions, lower taxes broadly, and let markets correct problems without intervention.
This article provides an overview and analysis of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton's opposing economic plans and their potential impacts. Trump proposes large tax cuts that would greatly increase the national debt, while Clinton proposes more moderate tax increases on the wealthy to fund spending increases. The article analyzes how each candidate's plans could impact key areas like the economy, jobs, taxes, investments, and healthcare. It also cites analyses finding Clinton's plans would have a more positive economic impact while Trump's plans could trigger a recession due to proposed policies like trade wars.
The document discusses social stratification and systems of stratification including open and closed systems. It provides data on income, wealth, socioeconomic status, prestige ratings for different occupations, poverty rates by race/ethnicity, education levels and age groups. It also discusses the working poor, distributions of household income and rates of health insurance coverage.
Let's have a discussion about capitalism and socialism. This slideshare makes the case that what we need is more capitalism as it is the system that reduces poverty and actually delivers a better overall quality of life. Yes, there are improvements that can be made, but let's have that discussion before we make revolutionary changes that have not worked well in other places.
This State Factor examines the relationship between state tax policies and charitable giving. It summarizes research finding that higher state taxes are associated with lower levels of charitable giving. Specifically, a 1 percentage point increase in state income tax burden is associated with a 0.35% decrease in charitable donations per dollar of state income. The document discusses the important role of charitable organizations in addressing social issues and argues they are often more effective than government programs in providing services due to greater flexibility and accountability from relying on voluntary donations rather than tax funds. It maintains that state policies should consider how to encourage charitable giving."
This white paper proposes tax reforms to promote economic growth and equity in the United States. It summarizes that the current US economic situation features high unemployment, stagnating incomes, and extreme inequality. The author argues corporate and personal income tax reforms could help address these issues by raising revenues to invest in the economy while reducing inequality. The paper outlines principles for tax reform and specific proposals, including increasing taxes on corporations and high incomes, closing loopholes, reforming estate taxes, and implementing environmental taxes. The goal is for taxation reforms to strengthen the economy, improve distribution, and encourage socially beneficial behavior.
Steven Rattner testified before the Senate Finance Committee on the need for tax reform. He argued that the tax code has deteriorated without reform in over 30 years, allowing lawyers and accountants to legally ease tax burdens for their wealthy clients. For example, the 400 highest income Americans saw their tax rate drop from 30% to 17% from 1995 to 2012 due largely to low capital gains and dividend rates. Rattner advocated achieving greater fairness and revenue by reducing the number of tax rates, eliminating special treatment of capital gains and dividends, and reducing loopholes that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
This document summarizes a report by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) on the costs of tax cronyism. It defines tax cronyism as using tax policy to benefit specific firms or industries rather than having broadly applicable, neutral tax rules. The report argues that tax cronyism stifles competition and economic growth. It suggests eliminating tax cronyism through revenue-neutral tax reforms or increased transparency and analysis of such policies to ensure they create economic growth beyond their costs. The report estimates that tax carve-outs in the US total around $488 billion annually but notes tax cronyism is difficult to quantify fully due to lack of transparency.
The document discusses the financial crisis and responses to it. It argues that government policy mistakes led to the crisis and that bailouts will not solve it. Keynesian economic policies like increased spending and stimulus plans will not work and instead will lead to higher long-term government spending and taxation that hinders growth. The ideal approach is to limit government's role to core functions, lower taxes broadly, and let markets correct problems without intervention.
This article provides an overview and analysis of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton's opposing economic plans and their potential impacts. Trump proposes large tax cuts that would greatly increase the national debt, while Clinton proposes more moderate tax increases on the wealthy to fund spending increases. The article analyzes how each candidate's plans could impact key areas like the economy, jobs, taxes, investments, and healthcare. It also cites analyses finding Clinton's plans would have a more positive economic impact while Trump's plans could trigger a recession due to proposed policies like trade wars.
The document discusses social stratification and systems of stratification including open and closed systems. It provides data on income, wealth, socioeconomic status, prestige ratings for different occupations, poverty rates by race/ethnicity, education levels and age groups. It also discusses the working poor, distributions of household income and rates of health insurance coverage.
Let's have a discussion about capitalism and socialism. This slideshare makes the case that what we need is more capitalism as it is the system that reduces poverty and actually delivers a better overall quality of life. Yes, there are improvements that can be made, but let's have that discussion before we make revolutionary changes that have not worked well in other places.
This State Factor examines the relationship between state tax policies and charitable giving. It summarizes research finding that higher state taxes are associated with lower levels of charitable giving. Specifically, a 1 percentage point increase in state income tax burden is associated with a 0.35% decrease in charitable donations per dollar of state income. The document discusses the important role of charitable organizations in addressing social issues and argues they are often more effective than government programs in providing services due to greater flexibility and accountability from relying on voluntary donations rather than tax funds. It maintains that state policies should consider how to encourage charitable giving."
This white paper proposes tax reforms to promote economic growth and equity in the United States. It summarizes that the current US economic situation features high unemployment, stagnating incomes, and extreme inequality. The author argues corporate and personal income tax reforms could help address these issues by raising revenues to invest in the economy while reducing inequality. The paper outlines principles for tax reform and specific proposals, including increasing taxes on corporations and high incomes, closing loopholes, reforming estate taxes, and implementing environmental taxes. The goal is for taxation reforms to strengthen the economy, improve distribution, and encourage socially beneficial behavior.
Steven Rattner testified before the Senate Finance Committee on the need for tax reform. He argued that the tax code has deteriorated without reform in over 30 years, allowing lawyers and accountants to legally ease tax burdens for their wealthy clients. For example, the 400 highest income Americans saw their tax rate drop from 30% to 17% from 1995 to 2012 due largely to low capital gains and dividend rates. Rattner advocated achieving greater fairness and revenue by reducing the number of tax rates, eliminating special treatment of capital gains and dividends, and reducing loopholes that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
This document summarizes a report by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) on the costs of tax cronyism. It defines tax cronyism as using tax policy to benefit specific firms or industries rather than having broadly applicable, neutral tax rules. The report argues that tax cronyism stifles competition and economic growth. It suggests eliminating tax cronyism through revenue-neutral tax reforms or increased transparency and analysis of such policies to ensure they create economic growth beyond their costs. The report estimates that tax carve-outs in the US total around $488 billion annually but notes tax cronyism is difficult to quantify fully due to lack of transparency.
- Between 65-70% of households in 25 advanced economies, or around 540-580 million people, had market incomes in 2014 that were flat or lower than in 2005. This is a significant increase compared to less than 2% of households between 1993-2005.
- Younger, less educated workers have been hit hardest, with most age and education segments experiencing flat or falling incomes from 2002-2012. Today's youth may end up poorer than their parents.
- Government policies and labor market practices influenced the impact, but factors like slowing GDP growth after the recession, declining wage share, aging populations, and smaller households also contributed to widespread flat or falling incomes.
Thirty years of growing income inequality, corporate tax cuts and personal tax breaks for the wealthy have undermined the livelihood of working people and set up a state budget crisis which does not need to
exist. We present alternative tax proposals and issue a warning of the ominous consequences of privatization, layoffs and state service cuts for all New Yorkers.
The document summarizes and responds to arguments made in a Florida state budget debate. It argues that the state Senate and media are wrongly advocating for tax increases to fund additional government spending, while the House and Governor correctly want to keep taxes low and "live within the state's means." The document asserts that Florida's economic growth is best encouraged by cutting taxes, not raising them, and that spending on education and Medicaid is unsustainable without reforms to introduce competition and efficiencies.
Star-Gazette letters-to-the-editor By Gerald J. Furnkranz 2005-09Gerald Furnkranz
- Obama's first pitch at the MLB All-Star Game was widely considered weak and inaccurate, landing short of home plate, but the media portrayed it in a positive light to enhance Obama's image.
- The author argues that Obama and the media employ similar tactics of manipulation and embellishment to portray Obama's policies and performances in an unjustifiably positive manner and hide his shortcomings.
- The author believes Obama's policies will devastate the country's economy and that the media acts as an arm of Obama's publicity campaign by beautifying his image.
This document provides an executive summary of the 2015 edition of the report "Rich States, Poor States" by Arthur Laffer, Stephen Moore, and Jonathan Williams. The report analyzes state economic policies and provides the 2015 ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index, which ranks states based on past economic performance and future economic outlook. Some of the best practices identified for states include lowering taxes, reducing regulations, and controlling spending and debt. The report also discusses important state policy developments since the previous edition and warns against the pitfalls of "tax cronyism." Chapters analyze specific state policy issues and economic reforms in Kansas in more depth. The state rankings aim to identify which state policies have led to greater economic opportunity
This document outlines the agenda and activities of an organization called "Hedge Clippers" that is fighting against the destructive agenda of hedge fund billionaires. The organization produces reports exposing how hedge funds hurt the economy, corrupt government, and exacerbate inequality. It advocates for closing tax loopholes that benefit hedge funds, raising taxes on the wealthy, and pushing for divestment from hedge funds. Through research, protests, and state-level lobbying, Hedge Clippers aims to generate billions in new tax revenue from hedge funds that can be invested in schools, jobs, and communities.
Politicians will face major voter backlash if they advocate cuts in Social Security benefits or choose deficit reduction over job creation, according to a poll by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner commissioned by the Campaign for America’s Future and Democracy Corps, with support from MoveOn.org; the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the Service Employees International Union.
Fund Our Future Tax The Rich Invest In Our New Yorkstrongforall
This document proposes six bills as part of the "Invest in Our NY Act" to raise $51-75 billion annually. The bills would: 1) Create a progressive income tax system; 2) Tax investment income the same as wages; 3) Create an inheritance tax; 4) Tax billionaire fortunes and amend the constitution to allow a wealth tax; 5) Create a tax on financial transactions; 6) Offset corporate tax cuts from Trump. The proposals are aimed at taxing the wealthy and large corporations to generate revenue to invest in New York's economy and support services.
The best data we have on the
upper tail of the income distribution come from Piketty and Saez’s (2003, with
updates) tabulations of individual tax returns. (Even these numbers, though, are
subject to some controversy: the tax code changes over time, altering the incentives
to receive and report compensation in alternative forms.) According to their
numbers, the share of income, excluding capital gains, earned by the top 1 percent
rose from 7.7 percent in 1973 to 17.4 percent in 2010. Even more striking is the
share earned by the top 0.01 percent—an elite group that, in 2010, had a membership
requirement of annual income exceeding $5.9 million. This group’s share of
total income rose from 0.5 percent in 1973 to 3.3 percent in 2010. These numbers
are not easily ignored. Indeed, they in no small part motivated the Occupy movement,
and they have led to calls from policymakers on the left to make the tax code
more progressive.
Ahmed.Tanzeel.outstanding_thesis_nominationTanzeel Ahmed
The document is a research proposal that aims to study whether the Earned Income Tax Credit increases income inequality in the United States. While most research shows the EITC reduces poverty, the author wants to analyze if it exacerbates income inequality over time by looking at differences across states that have their own supplemental tax credits. The author argues the EITC structure discourages additional income beyond a certain point, causing wages of low-income workers to stagnate while returns from economic growth are redistributed upward, widening the gap between high and low incomes.
This document analyzes the potential economic and fiscal effects of President Obama's proposed tax increases. It finds that enacting these tax increases would:
1) Slow economic growth significantly over the next decade, reducing GDP by $1.1 trillion total and eliminating hundreds of thousands of jobs each year on average.
2) Reduce business investment, personal savings, consumer spending and disposable income while increasing unemployment.
3) Have widespread negative impacts beyond just high-income taxpayers by slowing the overall economy, reducing job opportunities and income.
4) Exacerbate the country's fiscal problems by reducing the tax base as taxpayers adapt to higher rates, rather than solving the deficit issue through higher revenues alone. Congress should
This document discusses corporate inversions, where US companies restructure so their parent company is foreign to avoid high US corporate tax rates. Bermuda and Cayman Islands became popular locations. The US responded with a law in 2004 limiting tax benefits for inversions. However, companies could still reduce taxes by establishing foreign subsidiaries in low-tax countries like Ireland. Johnson Controls merged with Tyco and moved to Ireland, saving millions in taxes. Politicians argue this costs the US and states tax revenue, while advocates say lower corporate taxes could attract companies back to the US.
The document summarizes the key elements and economic impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It finds that the tax cuts will add $1-1.5 trillion to the national debt over 10 years, benefit high-income groups the most, and potentially increase the number of uninsured by 13 million people. While proponents claim it will boost economic growth and job creation, most experts estimate only a small, temporary GDP increase with limited benefits that fade over time. There are also risks that higher debt could crowd out private investment and increase the chances of a fiscal crisis.
The LIBRE Institute seeks to strengthen Hispanic communities through economic prosperity programs. It aims to educate Hispanics on financial wellness and entrepreneurship to increase independence. Surveys show Hispanics want more information on personal finances and entrepreneurship. The Institute works to address this need through its Economic Prosperity Pillar.
Jobs, Innovation, and Opportunity in the StatesALEC
With unemployment remaining stubbornly high, and most Americans worrying about pocketbook issues like jobs, energy costs, retirement security, and health care affordability – ALEC releases its plan for Jobs, Innovation, and Opportunity. State lawmakers today face very difficult economic challenges. Since 1973, ALEC has focused on providing solutions to America’s biggest problems. State lawmakers can conquer today’s economic challenges by refocusing on our nation’s founding principles of limited government and free markets. The states, not Washington, D.C., must take the lead in restarting America’s economic engine and putting people back to work.
For more information, please visit www.alec.org.
Right-wing billionaires such as Robert Mercer are attacking the New York State Constitution to gain more power and tax breaks for themselves at the expense of working families. Mercer created the group "Reclaim New York" to push for a constitutional convention and rewrite the constitution to benefit billionaire interests by cutting taxes, privatizing schools, allowing fracking, and reducing environmental and worker protections. Voters will decide in November 2017 whether to hold a constitutional convention, and the document argues that people should vote no to block these billionaire efforts to rig the system for their own benefit.
This document advocates raising taxes on high-income individuals, highly profitable companies, and extreme wealth in New York to generate over $50 billion in additional annual revenue. It argues this revenue could fund investments to address New York's economic and social crises exacerbated by COVID-19, including decades of disinvestment in education, public services, and communities. The document cites studies showing states that tax the rich recover faster from economic downturns and that the wealthy are unlikely to relocate in response to tax increases.
This is a big picture overview of the social and economic transformation of the USA in the last 20 years. Great wealth and prestige has been lost, the manufacturing and agriculture sectors have declined. The middle class has been decimated and great wealth inequality has been created. Government is under control of big corporations, especially in finance, and effective government agency has been lost.
This document summarizes and rebuts five common "lies" or misconceptions about taxes in the United States. The first is that tax dollars are wasted by government. However, taxes fund important and popular services like Social Security, infrastructure, and national defense. Second, it is a myth that cutting taxes increases revenue; in reality, tax cuts typically decrease revenue. Third, not half of Americans avoid taxes altogether as some claim, since most pay other taxes besides income tax. Fourth, US citizens are not overtaxed compared to history or other developed nations. Fifth, the perception that taxes are too high may stem from effective anti-tax rhetoric and public ignorance about tax rates and spending.
Economists See Clouds in the Silver LiningYardi Matrix
Download the full report: https://goo.gl/5jwDS5
At a time when optimism is rampant in the real estate industry, and the stock market is near all-time highs after a massive run-up, economists lived up to their billing as dismal scientists at the National Association of Business Economists (NABE) annual policy conference in Washington, D.C., last week.
Although the immediate state of the economy is healthy, economists lamented the country’s long-term fiscal situation, recently made worse by the tax reform passed by Congress. They were also pessimistic about the prospects for policy solutions, which include prudent immigration reform and fewer—not more—restrictions on global trade, given the growing populism that is producing an electorate with increasingly polarized views in the U.S. and Europe.
“I’m concerned that the political system has not come to grips with sensible fiscal policy,” said Alice Rivlin, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.
The document discusses the ongoing financial crisis and recession, and argues that government intervention through bailouts and stimulus spending will make the situation worse and lead to higher taxes and a larger government. It advocates for smaller government, lower taxes, and allowing markets to correct themselves without intervention as the best path forward.
The document provides an overview of key economic and political events during Barack Obama's presidency from 2009 to 2017. It discusses challenges Obama faced such as the recession and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also outlines some of Obama's policy priorities like health care reform, stimulus spending, budget negotiations with Congress, immigration reform and climate change. Economic metrics during Obama's time like GDP growth, unemployment, income inequality and housing are addressed.
- Between 65-70% of households in 25 advanced economies, or around 540-580 million people, had market incomes in 2014 that were flat or lower than in 2005. This is a significant increase compared to less than 2% of households between 1993-2005.
- Younger, less educated workers have been hit hardest, with most age and education segments experiencing flat or falling incomes from 2002-2012. Today's youth may end up poorer than their parents.
- Government policies and labor market practices influenced the impact, but factors like slowing GDP growth after the recession, declining wage share, aging populations, and smaller households also contributed to widespread flat or falling incomes.
Thirty years of growing income inequality, corporate tax cuts and personal tax breaks for the wealthy have undermined the livelihood of working people and set up a state budget crisis which does not need to
exist. We present alternative tax proposals and issue a warning of the ominous consequences of privatization, layoffs and state service cuts for all New Yorkers.
The document summarizes and responds to arguments made in a Florida state budget debate. It argues that the state Senate and media are wrongly advocating for tax increases to fund additional government spending, while the House and Governor correctly want to keep taxes low and "live within the state's means." The document asserts that Florida's economic growth is best encouraged by cutting taxes, not raising them, and that spending on education and Medicaid is unsustainable without reforms to introduce competition and efficiencies.
Star-Gazette letters-to-the-editor By Gerald J. Furnkranz 2005-09Gerald Furnkranz
- Obama's first pitch at the MLB All-Star Game was widely considered weak and inaccurate, landing short of home plate, but the media portrayed it in a positive light to enhance Obama's image.
- The author argues that Obama and the media employ similar tactics of manipulation and embellishment to portray Obama's policies and performances in an unjustifiably positive manner and hide his shortcomings.
- The author believes Obama's policies will devastate the country's economy and that the media acts as an arm of Obama's publicity campaign by beautifying his image.
This document provides an executive summary of the 2015 edition of the report "Rich States, Poor States" by Arthur Laffer, Stephen Moore, and Jonathan Williams. The report analyzes state economic policies and provides the 2015 ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index, which ranks states based on past economic performance and future economic outlook. Some of the best practices identified for states include lowering taxes, reducing regulations, and controlling spending and debt. The report also discusses important state policy developments since the previous edition and warns against the pitfalls of "tax cronyism." Chapters analyze specific state policy issues and economic reforms in Kansas in more depth. The state rankings aim to identify which state policies have led to greater economic opportunity
This document outlines the agenda and activities of an organization called "Hedge Clippers" that is fighting against the destructive agenda of hedge fund billionaires. The organization produces reports exposing how hedge funds hurt the economy, corrupt government, and exacerbate inequality. It advocates for closing tax loopholes that benefit hedge funds, raising taxes on the wealthy, and pushing for divestment from hedge funds. Through research, protests, and state-level lobbying, Hedge Clippers aims to generate billions in new tax revenue from hedge funds that can be invested in schools, jobs, and communities.
Politicians will face major voter backlash if they advocate cuts in Social Security benefits or choose deficit reduction over job creation, according to a poll by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner commissioned by the Campaign for America’s Future and Democracy Corps, with support from MoveOn.org; the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the Service Employees International Union.
Fund Our Future Tax The Rich Invest In Our New Yorkstrongforall
This document proposes six bills as part of the "Invest in Our NY Act" to raise $51-75 billion annually. The bills would: 1) Create a progressive income tax system; 2) Tax investment income the same as wages; 3) Create an inheritance tax; 4) Tax billionaire fortunes and amend the constitution to allow a wealth tax; 5) Create a tax on financial transactions; 6) Offset corporate tax cuts from Trump. The proposals are aimed at taxing the wealthy and large corporations to generate revenue to invest in New York's economy and support services.
The best data we have on the
upper tail of the income distribution come from Piketty and Saez’s (2003, with
updates) tabulations of individual tax returns. (Even these numbers, though, are
subject to some controversy: the tax code changes over time, altering the incentives
to receive and report compensation in alternative forms.) According to their
numbers, the share of income, excluding capital gains, earned by the top 1 percent
rose from 7.7 percent in 1973 to 17.4 percent in 2010. Even more striking is the
share earned by the top 0.01 percent—an elite group that, in 2010, had a membership
requirement of annual income exceeding $5.9 million. This group’s share of
total income rose from 0.5 percent in 1973 to 3.3 percent in 2010. These numbers
are not easily ignored. Indeed, they in no small part motivated the Occupy movement,
and they have led to calls from policymakers on the left to make the tax code
more progressive.
Ahmed.Tanzeel.outstanding_thesis_nominationTanzeel Ahmed
The document is a research proposal that aims to study whether the Earned Income Tax Credit increases income inequality in the United States. While most research shows the EITC reduces poverty, the author wants to analyze if it exacerbates income inequality over time by looking at differences across states that have their own supplemental tax credits. The author argues the EITC structure discourages additional income beyond a certain point, causing wages of low-income workers to stagnate while returns from economic growth are redistributed upward, widening the gap between high and low incomes.
This document analyzes the potential economic and fiscal effects of President Obama's proposed tax increases. It finds that enacting these tax increases would:
1) Slow economic growth significantly over the next decade, reducing GDP by $1.1 trillion total and eliminating hundreds of thousands of jobs each year on average.
2) Reduce business investment, personal savings, consumer spending and disposable income while increasing unemployment.
3) Have widespread negative impacts beyond just high-income taxpayers by slowing the overall economy, reducing job opportunities and income.
4) Exacerbate the country's fiscal problems by reducing the tax base as taxpayers adapt to higher rates, rather than solving the deficit issue through higher revenues alone. Congress should
This document discusses corporate inversions, where US companies restructure so their parent company is foreign to avoid high US corporate tax rates. Bermuda and Cayman Islands became popular locations. The US responded with a law in 2004 limiting tax benefits for inversions. However, companies could still reduce taxes by establishing foreign subsidiaries in low-tax countries like Ireland. Johnson Controls merged with Tyco and moved to Ireland, saving millions in taxes. Politicians argue this costs the US and states tax revenue, while advocates say lower corporate taxes could attract companies back to the US.
The document summarizes the key elements and economic impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It finds that the tax cuts will add $1-1.5 trillion to the national debt over 10 years, benefit high-income groups the most, and potentially increase the number of uninsured by 13 million people. While proponents claim it will boost economic growth and job creation, most experts estimate only a small, temporary GDP increase with limited benefits that fade over time. There are also risks that higher debt could crowd out private investment and increase the chances of a fiscal crisis.
The LIBRE Institute seeks to strengthen Hispanic communities through economic prosperity programs. It aims to educate Hispanics on financial wellness and entrepreneurship to increase independence. Surveys show Hispanics want more information on personal finances and entrepreneurship. The Institute works to address this need through its Economic Prosperity Pillar.
Jobs, Innovation, and Opportunity in the StatesALEC
With unemployment remaining stubbornly high, and most Americans worrying about pocketbook issues like jobs, energy costs, retirement security, and health care affordability – ALEC releases its plan for Jobs, Innovation, and Opportunity. State lawmakers today face very difficult economic challenges. Since 1973, ALEC has focused on providing solutions to America’s biggest problems. State lawmakers can conquer today’s economic challenges by refocusing on our nation’s founding principles of limited government and free markets. The states, not Washington, D.C., must take the lead in restarting America’s economic engine and putting people back to work.
For more information, please visit www.alec.org.
Right-wing billionaires such as Robert Mercer are attacking the New York State Constitution to gain more power and tax breaks for themselves at the expense of working families. Mercer created the group "Reclaim New York" to push for a constitutional convention and rewrite the constitution to benefit billionaire interests by cutting taxes, privatizing schools, allowing fracking, and reducing environmental and worker protections. Voters will decide in November 2017 whether to hold a constitutional convention, and the document argues that people should vote no to block these billionaire efforts to rig the system for their own benefit.
This document advocates raising taxes on high-income individuals, highly profitable companies, and extreme wealth in New York to generate over $50 billion in additional annual revenue. It argues this revenue could fund investments to address New York's economic and social crises exacerbated by COVID-19, including decades of disinvestment in education, public services, and communities. The document cites studies showing states that tax the rich recover faster from economic downturns and that the wealthy are unlikely to relocate in response to tax increases.
This is a big picture overview of the social and economic transformation of the USA in the last 20 years. Great wealth and prestige has been lost, the manufacturing and agriculture sectors have declined. The middle class has been decimated and great wealth inequality has been created. Government is under control of big corporations, especially in finance, and effective government agency has been lost.
This document summarizes and rebuts five common "lies" or misconceptions about taxes in the United States. The first is that tax dollars are wasted by government. However, taxes fund important and popular services like Social Security, infrastructure, and national defense. Second, it is a myth that cutting taxes increases revenue; in reality, tax cuts typically decrease revenue. Third, not half of Americans avoid taxes altogether as some claim, since most pay other taxes besides income tax. Fourth, US citizens are not overtaxed compared to history or other developed nations. Fifth, the perception that taxes are too high may stem from effective anti-tax rhetoric and public ignorance about tax rates and spending.
Economists See Clouds in the Silver LiningYardi Matrix
Download the full report: https://goo.gl/5jwDS5
At a time when optimism is rampant in the real estate industry, and the stock market is near all-time highs after a massive run-up, economists lived up to their billing as dismal scientists at the National Association of Business Economists (NABE) annual policy conference in Washington, D.C., last week.
Although the immediate state of the economy is healthy, economists lamented the country’s long-term fiscal situation, recently made worse by the tax reform passed by Congress. They were also pessimistic about the prospects for policy solutions, which include prudent immigration reform and fewer—not more—restrictions on global trade, given the growing populism that is producing an electorate with increasingly polarized views in the U.S. and Europe.
“I’m concerned that the political system has not come to grips with sensible fiscal policy,” said Alice Rivlin, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.
The document discusses the ongoing financial crisis and recession, and argues that government intervention through bailouts and stimulus spending will make the situation worse and lead to higher taxes and a larger government. It advocates for smaller government, lower taxes, and allowing markets to correct themselves without intervention as the best path forward.
The document provides an overview of key economic and political events during Barack Obama's presidency from 2009 to 2017. It discusses challenges Obama faced such as the recession and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also outlines some of Obama's policy priorities like health care reform, stimulus spending, budget negotiations with Congress, immigration reform and climate change. Economic metrics during Obama's time like GDP growth, unemployment, income inequality and housing are addressed.
During the Obama era, the president faced significant economic challenges including a recession and high unemployment. While able to work with a Democratic congress initially, subsequent years saw more gridlock. Key issues included job growth, GDP levels, healthcare reform, budget deficits, income inequality, environmental policies and race relations. The administration cited positive statistics on private sector job gains but critics argued the recovery was weaker than other presidents.
During the Obama era, the President faced significant economic challenges including a recession and high unemployment. Through policies like the stimulus package and healthcare reform, unemployment was reduced and millions of jobs were created, although economic growth remained slow. Obama also withdrew troops from Iraq and focused on foreign policy issues like the Middle East and climate change in his second term. However, critics argue the stimulus failed to create sufficient jobs and the national debt increased substantially under Obama.
BlackRock Strategic Management in China Jake Donahue
BlackRock is considering investing in China as an emerging market opportunity. China is transitioning from a manufacturing to consumer-driven economy over 30 years, much faster than the US' 100-year transition. Risks include China's slowing GDP growth, high debt levels, lack of transparency, and socioeconomic inequality. If BlackRock invests, it should only do so in alignment with Chinese government priorities in strategic industries and assume both known and unknown risks will materialize.
Bp working-for-few-political-capture-economic-inequality-200114-enSalisu Borodo
The document discusses rising economic inequality globally and its risks. It notes that almost half of the world's wealth is owned by the richest 1% and their share of income has increased in most countries over recent decades. Extreme inequality is damaging as it can undermine economic growth, political representation, and social cohesion. Left unaddressed, inequality may further concentrate opportunity and advantages among the wealthy, exacerbating social tensions. The document calls for bold political action and policy reforms to curb the influence of wealth on politics and promote redistribution to reverse this trend.
Is the Fed blowing bubbles to cover up growing inequality.... again?Yannick Naud
1) The document discusses rising income inequality in the US and how the Fed has responded by creating housing bubbles to disguise the fact that the middle class is not benefiting from economic growth and to boost consumption.
2) It analyzes recent data showing that the top 1% captured 95% of income gains in the US recovery while the bottom 99% saw little growth. Inequality is surging to new highs not seen since before the Great Depression.
3) High and rising inequality has negative economic and social consequences like reduced economic growth and mobility if it passes a certain point, according to studies and economists cited in the document.
Bp working-for-few-political-capture-economic-inequalityanabenedito
The document discusses growing economic inequality around the world. It notes that almost half of the world's wealth is owned by just 1% of the population, while the bottom half owns less than 1% combined. Income inequality has increased in most countries over the past several decades. The concentration of wealth among few has negative impacts and poses serious risks. It can undermine democratic systems if wealthy interests dominate policymaking. The document calls for bold actions by governments and elites to reduce inequality through policies like progressive taxation, universal healthcare and education, living wages, and greater equality of opportunity.
The Great Rightward Shift: How Conservatism Shifted the Money to the 1%David Doney
The document discusses how conservative economic policies since 1980 have contributed to increasing income and wealth inequality in the United States. It notes that the top 1% now receive over 20% of income, versus 10% pre-1980, and own 42% of wealth compared to 24% in the mid-1970s. Conservative policies such as tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy 1% and weakening of unions have shifted more of the economic gains to the top earners over the past several decades. The rise of conservative media has also encouraged working-class voters to support policies that are not in their own economic interests.
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic PoliciesSusana Gallardo
This paper assesses the macroeconomic consequences of presidential candidate Donald
Trump’s proposed economic policies. These include his policies on taxes and government
spending, immigration, and international trade. A similar analysis of candidate Hillary
Clinton’s proposed economic policies will be forthcoming
AEC, KI a INESS v spolupráci s ďalšími partnermi organizovali medzinárodnú
konferenciu v rámci Free Market Road Show 2013 na tému Šetriť alebo
nešetriť: Zachránia Európu len úsporné opatrenia?, ktorá sa konala dňa 7.
júna 2013 v Bratislave. Ďalšie súvisiace informácie nájdete na
www.konzervativizmus.sk
AEC, in cooperation with the Conservative Institute and INESS, and in
association with international partners organized the Free Market Road
Show 2013 in Bratislava on June 7, 2013. More information at
www.institute.sk.
1. The document discusses corporate and individual income taxes in the United States, including tax rates, tax brackets, and the debate around taxing the wealthy.
2. It provides examples of tax rates and calculations for various investments, bonds, and dividends.
3. The debate around increasing taxes on the top 1% is examined, with arguments on both sides discussed around whether the wealthy pay their fair share or should contribute more in taxes.
A detailed review of the causes and effects of income inequality. Details on how extreme it is. Citation of many authors suggesting how it came about and what to do about it.
Similar to Рейтинг вільних економік світу за 2016 рік (15)
The leaders of the Jewish Confederation of Ukraine wrote a letter to President Macron expressing shock at the European Union's decision to sanction Moshe Kantor, the long-term president of the European Jewish Congress. They note that Kantor has dedicated his life to supporting Jewish communities, fighting antisemitism, and preserving Holocaust memory. As the proud members and partners of Kantor's European Jewish Congress, they have benefited from his unwavering support. They are confident the sanction was a mistake and call on Macron to oppose renewing the decision, for both Kantor's sake and Europe's Jewish communities who lost an important leader.
In a tight labour market, job-seekers gain bargaining power and leverage it into greater job quality—at least, that’s the conventional wisdom.
Michael, LMIC Economist, presented findings that reveal a weakened relationship between labour market tightness and job quality indicators following the pandemic. Labour market tightness coincided with growth in real wages for only a portion of workers: those in low-wage jobs requiring little education. Several factors—including labour market composition, worker and employer behaviour, and labour market practices—have contributed to the absence of worker benefits. These will be investigated further in future work.
Abhay Bhutada, the Managing Director of Poonawalla Fincorp Limited, is an accomplished leader with over 15 years of experience in commercial and retail lending. A Qualified Chartered Accountant, he has been pivotal in leveraging technology to enhance financial services. Starting his career at Bank of India, he later founded TAB Capital Limited and co-founded Poonawalla Finance Private Limited, emphasizing digital lending. Under his leadership, Poonawalla Fincorp achieved a 'AAA' credit rating, integrating acquisitions and emphasizing corporate governance. Actively involved in industry forums and CSR initiatives, Abhay has been recognized with awards like "Young Entrepreneur of India 2017" and "40 under 40 Most Influential Leader for 2020-21." Personally, he values mindfulness, enjoys gardening, yoga, and sees every day as an opportunity for growth and improvement.
STREETONOMICS: Exploring the Uncharted Territories of Informal Markets throug...sameer shah
Delve into the world of STREETONOMICS, where a team of 7 enthusiasts embarks on a journey to understand unorganized markets. By engaging with a coffee street vendor and crafting questionnaires, this project uncovers valuable insights into consumer behavior and market dynamics in informal settings."
New Visa Rules for Tourists and Students in Thailand | Amit Kakkar Easy VisaAmit Kakkar
Discover essential details about Thailand's recent visa policy changes, tailored for tourists and students. Amit Kakkar Easy Visa provides a comprehensive overview of new requirements, application processes, and tips to ensure a smooth transition for all travelers.
A toxic combination of 15 years of low growth, and four decades of high inequality, has left Britain poorer and falling behind its peers. Productivity growth is weak and public investment is low, while wages today are no higher than they were before the financial crisis. Britain needs a new economic strategy to lift itself out of stagnation.
Scotland is in many ways a microcosm of this challenge. It has become a hub for creative industries, is home to several world-class universities and a thriving community of businesses – strengths that need to be harness and leveraged. But it also has high levels of deprivation, with homelessness reaching a record high and nearly half a million people living in very deep poverty last year. Scotland won’t be truly thriving unless it finds ways to ensure that all its inhabitants benefit from growth and investment. This is the central challenge facing policy makers both in Holyrood and Westminster.
What should a new national economic strategy for Scotland include? What would the pursuit of stronger economic growth mean for local, national and UK-wide policy makers? How will economic change affect the jobs we do, the places we live and the businesses we work for? And what are the prospects for cities like Glasgow, and nations like Scotland, in rising to these challenges?
[4:55 p.m.] Bryan Oates
OJPs are becoming a critical resource for policy-makers and researchers who study the labour market. LMIC continues to work with Vicinity Jobs’ data on OJPs, which can be explored in our Canadian Job Trends Dashboard. Valuable insights have been gained through our analysis of OJP data, including LMIC research lead
Suzanne Spiteri’s recent report on improving the quality and accessibility of job postings to reduce employment barriers for neurodivergent people.
Decoding job postings: Improving accessibility for neurodivergent job seekers
Improving the quality and accessibility of job postings is one way to reduce employment barriers for neurodivergent people.
Dr. Alyce Su Cover Story - China's Investment Leadermsthrill
In World Expo 2010 Shanghai – the most visited Expo in the World History
https://www.britannica.com/event/Expo-Shanghai-2010
China’s official organizer of the Expo, CCPIT (China Council for the Promotion of International Trade https://en.ccpit.org/) has chosen Dr. Alyce Su as the Cover Person with Cover Story, in the Expo’s official magazine distributed throughout the Expo, showcasing China’s New Generation of Leaders to the World.
Vicinity Jobs’ data includes more than three million 2023 OJPs and thousands of skills. Most skills appear in less than 0.02% of job postings, so most postings rely on a small subset of commonly used terms, like teamwork.
Laura Adkins-Hackett, Economist, LMIC, and Sukriti Trehan, Data Scientist, LMIC, presented their research exploring trends in the skills listed in OJPs to develop a deeper understanding of in-demand skills. This research project uses pointwise mutual information and other methods to extract more information about common skills from the relationships between skills, occupations and regions.
OJP data from firms like Vicinity Jobs have emerged as a complement to traditional sources of labour demand data, such as the Job Vacancy and Wages Survey (JVWS). Ibrahim Abuallail, PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa, presented research relating to bias in OJPs and a proposed approach to effectively adjust OJP data to complement existing official data (such as from the JVWS) and improve the measurement of labour demand.
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance36 Crypto
Learn in-depth about Dogecoin's trajectory and stay informed with 36crypto's essential and up-to-date information about the crypto space.
Our presentation delves into Dogecoin's potential future, exploring whether it's destined to skyrocket to the moon or face a downward spiral. In addition, it highlights invaluable insights. Don't miss out on this opportunity to enhance your crypto understanding!
https://36crypto.com/the-future-of-dogecoin-how-high-can-this-cryptocurrency-reach/
Economic Risk Factor Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
May’s reports showed signs of continued economic growth, said Sam Millette, director, fixed income, in his latest Economic Risk Factor Update.
For more market updates, subscribe to The Independent Market Observer at https://blog.commonwealth.com/independent-market-observer.
Every business, big or small, deals with outgoing payments. Whether it’s to suppliers for inventory, to employees for salaries, or to vendors for services rendered, keeping track of these expenses is crucial. This is where payment vouchers come in – the unsung heroes of the accounting world.
University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcripttscdzuip
办理美国UNCC毕业证书制作北卡大学夏洛特分校假文凭定制Q微168899991做UNCC留信网教留服认证海牙认证改UNCC成绩单GPA做UNCC假学位证假文凭高仿毕业证GRE代考如何申请北卡罗莱纳大学夏洛特分校University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
Рейтинг вільних економік світу за 2016 рік
1. A supplement to the 2016 Index of Economic Freedom
Economic Freedom
in America
Terry Miller
Anthony B. Kim
INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC
FREEDOM AND OPPORTUNITY
2. U.S. Economy:
“Mostly Free”
COMPONENTS OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM
U.S. NOT IN TOP TEN
IN ECONOMIC FREEDOM
TheUnitedStates’decliningscoreintheIndexof
EconomicFreedomiscloselyrelatedtorapidlyrising
governmentspending,subsidies,andbailouts.Since
early2009:
Government spending has exploded,
amounting to $29,867 per household in 2015.
The national debt has risen to $125,000 for
every tax-filing household in America—a total
over $18 trillion.
The government takeover of health care is
raising prices and disrupting markets.
Bailouts and new government regulations have
increased uncertainty, stifling investment and
job creation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
15
10
5
1
2008 ’10 ’12 ’14 2016
RANK SINCE 2008
70
75
80
85
2008 ’10 ’12 ’14 2016
SCORE SINCE 2008
LIMITED
GOVERNMENT
RULE
OF LAW
REGULATORY
EFFICIENCY
OPEN
MARKETS
Property Rights
Freedom from Corruption
Fiscal Freedom
Government Spending
Business Freedom
Labor Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Trade Freedom
Investment Freedom
Financial Freedom
80.0
74.0
65.6
54.7
84.7
91.4
77.0
87.0
70.0
70.0
U.S. score World average
0 50 100
50
25 75
0 100
75.4
81.0
75.4
No. 5
No. 11
1 Hong Kong
88.6
2 Singapore
87.8
3 New Zealand
81.6
4 Switzerland
81.0
5 Australia
80.3
6 Canada
78.0
7 Chile
77.7
8 Ireland
77.3
9 Estonia
77.0
10 United Kingdom
76.4
11 United States
75.4
3. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 1
Global economic freedom has reached record levels, but America is moving
in the opposite direction. With losses of economic freedom in eight of the
past nine years, the U.S. in 2016 has tied its worst score ever in the Index of
Economic Freedom, wiping out a decade of progress that had seen the U.S. rise
as high as fourth place in the annual rankings for 2007.
In 2016, U.S. ratings for labor freedom, business freedom, and fiscal free-
dom have flagged notably, and the regulatory burden is increasingly costly.
Worse, government favoritism toward entrenched interests has hurt innova-
tion and contributed to a lackluster recovery and sub-par income growth.
As a result, the United States is only the 11th freest economy in the 2016
Index, trailing comparable advanced economies such as Australia, Switzerland,
Eroding Economic Freedom
Threatens U.S. Prosperity
Overall Score
in the Index
of Economic
Freedom
Source: 2016 Index of Economic Freedom. Chart 1 heritage.org
America in Decline: Now Just “Mostly Free”
74
76
78
80
82
2007 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 2016
FREE
MOSTLY FREE
81.2
75.4
4. Economic Freedom in America2
New Zealand, Canada, and even the United Kingdom. The U.S. remains mired
in the ranks of the “mostly free,” the second-tier economic freedom status into
which it dropped in 2010.
AMERICA’S ECONOMIC FREEDOM
IN UNPRECEDENTED DECLINE
The U.S. is the only country to have recorded such a sustained loss of eco-
nomic freedom in recent years, and the causes of the decline are clear. The
overall U.S. score decline over the past decade is 5.8 points on the Index’s 100-
point scale.
Substantial expansion in the size and scope of government under the
Obama Administration, including through new and costly regulations in areas
like finance, health care, and the environment, has hit wide swaths of the econ-
omy, affecting almost every American in some way and reducing opportunities
for non-governmental production and investment. The growth of government
has been accompanied by increasing cronyism that has undermined the rule of
law and perceptions of fairness.
NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT
The reduction in America’s economic freedom has been accompanied by
stagnant growth of the U.S. economy and persistently low labor participation
rates. Decisive adoption of policies to revitalize economic freedom is essential
to regenerate economic dynamism and innovation.
Restoring the U.S. economy to the status of a “free” economy will require
significant changes in key policy areas. As described by this report, freedom-
enhancing and forward-looking policies in the 10 specific measurements of
economic freedom are the best hope for rebuilding an America where oppor-
tunity and prosperity flourish.
5. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 3
RULE OF LAW
PROPERTY RIGHTS: The American people’s trust in their government is the
lowest it has been in the past 10 years, according to three Gallup polls released
in 2015, with 75 percent of respondents saying they believe corruption is wide-
spread in the government and in government regulation of business. Although
property rights are guaranteed and the judiciary generally functions indepen-
dently and predictably, protection of those rights in practice has been uneven,
raising charges of favoritism.
According to the 2016 Index, 19 countries have more secure property rights
than the United States.
Though the United States has a long history of respect for property rights
and the rule of law, the past several years have seen a disturbing trend of creep-
ing politicization of economic decisions.
Property
Rights Score
in the Index
of Economic
Freedom
Source: 2016 Index of Economic Freedom. Chart 2 heritage.org
America’s Weakening Property Rights
75
80
85
90
95
2007 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 2016
90
80
FREE
MOSTLY FREE
6. Economic Freedom in America4
The U.S. government has become ever more involved in what had been
regarded as the private sphere of economic activity. One notorious case involv-
ing land use in Connecticut (Kelo v. City of New London) pitted homeown-
ers against a developer who had enlisted the city to use its power of eminent
domain to transfer the homeowners’ property to the developer for the devel-
oper’s private use. Today, the property lies vacant, the government having been
an agent of destruction rather than development.
The expansive use of government regulatory agencies to manage economic
activity, particularly in the financial, health care, and energy sectors, has
opened the door to increased cronyism.
CORRUPTION: The freedom from corruption score in the Index of Eco-
nomic Freedom is a measure of citizens’ perceptions of the level of corruption
in society.
As the U.S. government’s involvement in economic decision-making grows,
so too does the impression that political influence is increasingly an ingredi-
ent in economic success. This perception has been exacerbated by the sporadic
and non-transparent nature of U.S. government bailouts in the financial sector,
where some firms were rescued while others were allowed to go under.
This disturbing trend of political favoritism is increasingly encroaching on
America’s free-market system. Crony capitalism comes in many more forms
and shapes than bailouts and loan guarantees. Free enterprise, limited govern-
ment, and individual freedom form the bedrock of America’s greatness. They
allow America’s economy to flourish and its people to prosper. To strengthen
these principles, we must root out crony capitalism by attacking its source:
big government.
7. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 5
GROWTH OF GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT SPENDING: The size and scope of government have been
increasing measurably. Public spending has grown steadily over the past
decade and will hit record levels in the absence of immediate restraint. Total
government spending amounts to about 39 percent of GDP. Frontloading
spending increases, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 has not reduced either
the size or the scope of government.
$5.2
$5.6
$6.0
$6.4
$6.8
’08 ’09 ’10 ‘11 ’12 ’13 ’142015
Spending by all levels of
government has risen
significantly since 2008 ...
$6
$10
$14
$18
$22
’08 ’09 ’10 ‘11 ’12 ’13 ’142015
... which has contributed to a
76 percent increase in gross
government debt.
TRILLION TRILLION
Source: International Monetary Fund. Chart 3 heritage.org
Increased Government Spending Leads to More Debt
$5.4
$6.5
$10.7
$18.8
8. Economic Freedom in America6
FISCAL FREEDOM: A burdensome tax code that stifles entrepreneurship has
kept U.S. economic growth far below its potential following the recent reces-
sion. Though tax receipts were below average in recent years, this was due
largely to high unemployment and an anemic recovery from recession.
The top individual income tax rate is 39.6 percent, and the top corporate tax
rate remains among the world’s highest at 35 percent. The overall tax burden
equals 25.4 percent of total domestic income.
At a time when other industrialized nations have reformed their tax codes to
reduce taxation of corporate income, the continuing high U.S. tax rate under-
mines U.S. business competitiveness in the international marketplace. The
unique practice of taxing the foreign earnings of U.S. businesses adds an addi-
tional burden. It is no surprise that U.S. businesses are choosing to restructure
or relocate overseas in order to escape excessive corporate taxation.
The burdensome tax code discourages the very behaviors, such as work-
ing, investing, taking risk, and entrepreneurship, that spur economic growth.
Tax reform is essential both to lower rates and to revive these dormant eco-
nomic activities.
OECD Average
(excl. U.S.): 24.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Ireland United
Kingdom
South
Korea
Canada Mexico Germany Japan United
States
12.5%
21%
24.2%
26.3%
30% 30.2%
37%
39.1%
Combined Corporate Tax Rates (2014)
Source: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Chart 4 heritage.org
U.S. Corporate Tax Rates Are Highest in Developed World
9. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 7
REGULATORY INEFFICIENCY
BUSINESS FREEDOM: The excessive intrusion of government into wide
spheres of economic activity comes with a high cost to society as a whole.
Regulation, even when well intended or beneficial, can lead to a loss of eco-
nomic efficiency, lower productivity, and declining growth. Over the past
decade, the expansion of Uncle Sam’s regulatory control has been one of the
prime culprits in America’s startling decline in economic freedom and over-
all competitiveness.
America has become the land of overregulation, with its entrepreneurial
vitality increasingly drained by the massive expansion of the administrative
state. The scope and cost of escalating red tape has been a major factor in
lackluster job creation in recent years and holds back innovations that could
increase productivity. Since early 2009, more than 180 new major federal regu-
lations have been imposed on business operations at an estimated annual cost
of nearly $80 billion. Each new edict has meant new government bureaucracy
that entrepreneurs and producers must navigate.
LABOR FREEDOM: The ability of individuals to find employment opportuni-
ties and work is a key component of economic freedom. By the same token, the
ability of businesses to contract freely for labor and dismiss redundant work-
ers when they are no longer needed is essential to enhancing productivity and
Major Regulations on the Private Sector, by Administration
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office. Chart 5 heritage.org
Growing Burden of Regulation
Obama
Bush
2009–’14
Yearly Avg. Total
2001–’08
184
125
30.7
15.6
10. Economic Freedom in America8
sustaining overall economic growth. The main restraints on labor freedom in
America arise in connection with the operations of labor unions and the setting
of a minimum wage.
Unions often insist on terms that benefit them institutionally at the
expense of individual workers’ interests. It is notable that union membership
has fallen sharply in the U.S. private sector over the past generation, from over
a fifth of employees to less than 7 percent. However, unions maintain signifi-
cant influence in the government: Half of all U.S. union members now work for
the government.
Another notable area in which the U.S. falls short of complete labor freedom
is the setting of a minimum wage. Minimum wage laws prevent marginally
skilled workers from selling their labor to potentially willing employers, rais-
ing unemployment levels among the least skilled in the workforce.
MONETARY FREEDOM: Monetary freedom requires a stable currency and
market-determined prices. Whether acting as entrepreneurs or as consumers,
free people need a steady and reliable currency as a medium of exchange, unit
of account, and store of value. Without monetary freedom, it is difficult to cre-
ate long-term value or amass capital.
The aggressive, experimental monetary policy pursued by the U.S. Fed-
eral Reserve since 2008, which has held interest rates at record lows while
massively expanding the Fed’s asset ownership, has failed to produce growth
Percentage of Government Workers Belonging to a Union
Union Membership Common in Government Sector
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1973 1980 1990 2000 2010 2014
Source: Unionstats.com. Chart 6 heritage.org
23%
35.7%
11. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 9
Profits Sales Hours Worked
Prices
–77%
–36% –36%
+38%Effect of $15/Hour Minimum-Wage
on Average Fast-Food Restaurant
Sources: Heritage Foundation calculations. Chart 7 heritage.org
Minimum-Wage Hike Would Hurt Fast-Food Restaurants
Monetary
Freedom
Score in the
Index of
Economic
Freedom
Source: 2016 Index of Economic Freedom. Chart 8 heritage.org
America’s Monetary Freedom: Mostly Free
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
2007 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 2016
83.8
77
FREE
MOSTLY FREE
12. Economic Freedom in America10
while distorting the allocation of capital. Fed purchases, known as “quantita-
tive easing,” have created economic uncertainty with a negative impact on the
recovery of the U.S. economy. The Fed has also expanded its role in fiscal and
regulatory policies, adding to uncertainty in private markets.
The Fed’s interventions with guidance and even bailouts for specific finan-
cial corporations show an unwelcome willingness to go beyond traditional
roles. Ideally, the Fed should be boring: quietly adjusting the money supply
to keep liquidity high enough that Americans can do business, but not so high
that inflation takes over. A good central bank serves and follows the private
sector rather than attempting to lead it.
13. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 11
TRADE FREEDOM: The U.S. economy has benefited from a relatively high
degree of trade freedom. Trade volume topped $5 trillion in 2014 for the first
time ever. Since 2002, U.S. trade in goods and services has grown at a fast pace,
increasing from 23 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) to 30 percent
of GDP.
Still, the dynamic impact of free trade on America is regularly the sub-
ject of contentious debate both on Capitol Hill and in the media. Efforts by
individual industries or firms to obtain special protection against foreign
competition through tariffs or quotas, if successful, impose higher costs on
consumers and U.S. firms that rely on intermediate goods imports in their
own production processes. The “safeguards” or other retaliatory actions
OPEN MARKETS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
World
Trade as a
Percentage
of GDP
Source: World Bank. Chart 9 heritage.org
U.S. Lags Behind World in Use of Trade
59.4%
30.0%
United States
14. Economic Freedom in America12
permitted in trade agreements can impose costs on completely unre-
lated activities.
Fundamentally, free trade is about rejecting favoritism and expanding eco-
nomic opportunity for all. It is essential that policymakers separate hype from
fact and assess upcoming trade initiatives objectively. Armed with the facts,
they can then help to promote dynamic economic growth and lasting prosper-
ity in the U.S.
INVESTMENT FREEDOM: With an investment freedom score of 70, the
United States falls a distant 25 points behind top performer Luxembourg
and trails dozens of other developed countries. In the increasingly competi-
tive market for international investment, almost all countries are moving to
improve transparency and streamline government approval processes, most
having already removed sectoral restrictions.
Any foreign investment in the U.S. may be restricted by a review under the
Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) process. More restric-
tive in practice, however, are the legally required sectoral restrictions on for-
eign investments. Foreign investments may be limited or barred in shipping,
air transport, communications, fishing, energy, banking, and defense. Land
ownership is also subject to some restrictions.
While some of these restrictions on foreign investments may involve legiti-
mate national security issues, many of the sectoral restrictions reflect con-
cerns that have been overtaken by technological and market change. Their
Investment Freedom Score in
the Index of Economic Freedom
Source: 2016 Index of Economic Freedom. Chart 10 heritage.org
America’s Dwindling Investment and Financial Freedom
65
70
75
80
85
2007 2010 2016
80
70
MOSTLY FREE
MODERATELY FREE
Financial Freedom Score in
the Index of Economic Freedom
65
70
75
80
85
2007 2010 2016
80
70
MOSTLY FREE
MODERATELY FREE
15. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 13
primary effect today is not to improve U.S. security but rather to restrain trade
and give U.S. economic interests an advantage. Like other government inter-
ventions in favor of special interests, these investment restrictions reduce
overall economic freedom and favor a few Americans at the expense of the
general population.
FINANCIAL FREEDOM: Since the financial crisis in 2008, America’s finan-
cial freedom score has dropped 10 points to the “moderately free” category.
Congress set a dangerous precedent at the onset of the recession that some
firms were so important to the financial system that the government had to
intervene rather than let such large institutions go through bankruptcy.
Years after the financial turmoil, the policy failures that it revealed still have
not been resolved. The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Pro-
tection Act, hurriedly enacted in 2010, does little to address these failures and
in many ways actually makes things worse. Dodd–Frank’s 2,300 pages call for
243 rulemakings and 67 reports by federal agencies, according to a report by
the Davis–Polk law firm, which regularly tracks the progress of Dodd–Frank’s
implementation. Many parts of the law, ranging from price controls on debit
cards to the creation of a new bureaucracy for consumer financial “protection,”
have little to do with the financial crisis.
Perhaps Dodd–Frank’s greatest weakness is that it completely neglected
to address Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-created mort-
gage finance giants whose activities helped to create and exacerbate the 2008
financial crisis.
16. Rank Country Overall Score Rank Country Overall Score Rank Country Overall Score
RANKING THE WORLD BY ECONOMIC FREEDOM
0–49.9 REPRESSED
ECONOMIC FREEDOM SCORE
50–59.9 MOSTLY UNFREE
60–69.9 MODERATELY FREE
70–79.9 MOSTLY FREE
80–100 FREE
1 Hong Kong 88.6
2 Singapore 87.8
3 New Zealand 81.6
4 Switzerland 81.0
5 Australia 80.3
6 Canada 78.0
7 Chile 77.7
8 Ireland 77.3
9 Estonia 77.2
10 United Kingdom 76.4
11 United States 75.4
12 Denmark 75.3
13 Lithuania 75.2
14 Taiwan 74.7
15 Mauritius 74.7
16 Netherlands 74.6
17 Germany 74.4
18 Bahrain 74.3
19 Luxembourg 73.9
20 Iceland 73.3
21 Czech Republic 73.2
22 Japan 73.1
23 Georgia 72.6
24 Finland 72.6
25 United Arab Emirates 72.6
26 Sweden 72.0
27 South Korea 71.7
28 Austria 71.7
29 Malaysia 71.5
30 Botswana 71.1
31 Bahamas 70.9
32 Norway 70.8
33 Colombia 70.8
34 Qatar 70.7
35 Israel 70.7
36 Latvia 70.4
37 Macau 70.1
38 Saint Lucia 70.0
39 Poland 69.3
40 Saint Vincent
and the Grenadines 68.8
41 Uruguay 68.8
42 Cyprus 68.7
43 Spain 68.5
44 Belgium 68.4
45 Barbados 68.3
46 Jordan 68.3
47 Macedonia 67.5
48 Jamaica 67.5
49 Peru 67.4
50 Costa Rica 67.4
51 Brunei Darussalam 67.3
52 Oman 67.1
53 Dominica 67.0
54 Armenia 67.0
55 Malta 66.7
56 Slovakia 66.6
57 Cabo Verde 66.5
58 Hungary 66.0
59 Albania 65.9
60 Bulgaria 65.9
61 Romania 65.6
62 Mexico 65.2
63 El Salvador 65.1
64 Portugal 65.1
65 Montenegro 64.9
66 Panama 64.8
67 Thailand 63.9
68 Kazakhstan 63.6
69 Samoa 63.5
70 Philippines 63.1
71 Rwanda 63.1
72 Ghana 63.0
73 Trinidad and Tobago 62.9
74 Kuwait 62.7
75 France 62.3
76 Seychelles 62.2
77 Serbia 62.1
78 Saudi Arabia 62.1
79 Turkey 62.1
80 South Africa 61.9
81 Namibia 61.9
82 Guatemala 61.8
83 Paraguay 61.5
84 Kosovo 61.4
85 Morocco 61.3
86 Italy 61.2
87 Madagascar 61.1
88 Dominican Republic 61.0
89 Vanuatu 60.8
90 Slovenia 60.6
91 Azerbaijan 60.2
92 Côte d’Ivoire 60.0
93 Sri Lanka 59.9
94 Swaziland 59.7
95 Tonga 59.6
96 Kyrgyz Republic 59.6
97 Bhutan 59.5
98 Lebanon 59.5
99 Indonesia 59.4
100 Mongolia 59.4
101 Benin 59.3
102 Uganda 59.3
103 Croatia 59.1
104 Burkina Faso 59.1
105 Gabon 59.0
106 Zambia 58.8
107 Fiji 58.8
108 Bosnia and Herzegovina 58.6
109 Nicaragua 58.6
110 Tanzania 58.5
111 Senegal 58.1
112 Cambodia 57.9
113 Honduras 57.7
114 Tunisia 57.6
115 Kenya 57.5
116 Nigeria 57.5
117 Moldova 57.4
118 Belize 57.4
119 Gambia 57.1
120 São Tomé and Príncipe 56.7
121 Mali 56.5
122 Brazil 56.5
123 India 56.2
124 Djibouti 56.0
125 Egypt 56.0
126 Pakistan 55.9
127 Guyana 55.4
128 Mauritania 54.8
129 Niger 54.3
130 Cameroon 54.2
131 Vietnam 54.0
132 Maldives 53.9
133 Burundi 53.9
134 Suriname 53.8
135 Togo 53.6
136 Guinea 53.3
137 Bangladesh 53.3
138 Greece 53.2
139 Mozambique 53.2
140 Papua New Guinea 53.2
141 Comoros 52.4
142 Sierra Leone 52.3
143 Liberia 52.2
144 China 52.0
145 Guinea-Bissau 51.8
146 Malawi 51.8
147 Micronesia 51.8
148 Ethiopia 51.5
149 Tajikistan 51.3
150 Haiti 51.3
151 Nepal 50.9
152 Lesotho 50.6
153 Russia 50.6
154 Algeria 50.1
155 Laos 49.8
156 Angola 48.9
157 Belarus 48.8
158 Burma 48.7
159 Ecuador 48.6
160 Bolivia 47.4
161 Solomon Islands 47.0
162 Ukraine 46.8
163 Congo, Dem. Rep. of 46.4
164 Chad 46.3
165 Kiribati 46.2
166 Uzbekistan 46.0
167 Timor-Leste 45.8
168 Central African
Republic 45.2
169 Argentina 43.8
170 Equatorial Guinea 43.7
171 Iran 43.5
172 Congo, Rep. of 42.8
173 Eritrea 42.7
174 Turkmenistan 41.9
175 Zimbabwe 38.2
176 Venezuela 33.7
177 Cuba 29.8
178 North Korea 2.3
N/A Afghanistan N/A
N/A Iraq N/A
N/A Libya N/A
N/A Liechtenstein N/A
N/A Somalia N/A
N/A Sudan N/A
N/A Syria N/A
N/A Yemen N/A
17. The Heritage Foundation | Heritage.org/Index 15
Free markets, given a chance, can do better for all Americans—the rich and
poor, young and old, workers and business owners alike.
In the caricature of American capitalism presented by the left, the forces of
the free market exploit hardworking Americans. The truth is that Americans
have become shackled by a government that has forgotten its proper place in
American life, intervening in decisions that historically were within the pur-
view of individuals and families.
The cause of economic freedom must be to reempower individual Ameri-
cans, increasing their opportunity to succeed. In the 21st century, that means
upsetting the status quo—the all-too-comfortable arrangements between
government and its powerful clients in the private sphere who profit from
its worst excesses. It means reemphasizing our commitment to the ideals on
which our Republic was founded.
Once the gold standard that other nations aspired to emulate, America’s
position today serves as a cautionary tale. From bailouts and stimulus spending
to heavy regulation and tax treatments that manipulate the market, America’s
leaders have implemented government-centric policies that have undermined
America’s economic freedom at an alarming pace.
Our mission is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity,
and civil society flourish. We want neither to go back in time nor to go slower
than liberalism. We want to go elsewhere: not back, not left, but forward. Our
task, like the task of every generation of Americans, is a constructive one. It is
to distinguish what should be conserved from what should be reformed, abol-
ished, or overturned and to implement principled reforms that protect rights,
expand opportunity, strengthen civil society, and eliminate favoritism.
With that in mind, specific policy recommendations based on conservative
principles on how to restore America’s economic freedom can be found in The
Heritage Foundation’s Solutions 2016.
Why Economic Freedom Matters
18.
19. Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a
think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies
based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom,
traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving
and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are
consistent with those ideas and principles. Our vision is to build an America where
freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.
Heritage’s staff pursues this mission by performing timely, accurate research on key
policy issues and effectively marketing these findings to our primary audiences: members
of Congress, key congressional staff members, policymakers in the executive branch, the
nation’s news media, and the academic and policy communities.
Governed by an independent Board of Trustees, The Heritage Foundation is an
independent, tax-exempt institution. Heritage relies on the private financial support
of the general public—individuals, foundations, and corporations—for its income,
and accepts no government funds and performs no contract work. Heritage is one of
the nation’s largest public policy research organizations. Hundreds of thousands of
individual members make it one of the most broadly supported think tanks in America.
For more information, or to support our work, please contact The Heritage Foundation
at (800) 544-4843 or visit heritage.org.
20. The positive impact of economic freedom in building prosperity and reducing poverty has never
been clearer. For over two decades, the Index of Economic Freedom has measured the impact of
liberty and free markets around the globe, and the 2016 Index confirms the formidable positive
relationship between economic freedom and progress.
Through comprehensive analysis of diverse economies ranging from Hong Kong to North Korea,
the Index provides compelling evidence that freer economies are richer, cleaner, and healthier;
less prone to violence; and more politically stable. In every region of the world, opportunities
for innovation, progress, and human development are provided more easily when governments
respect and promote the principles of economic freedom.
The 2016 Index—the 22nd edition—includes:
• Updated economic freedom scores and macroeconomic data for 186 economies.
• Easy-to-read cross-country comparisons that highlight why economic freedom matters.
• Three informative chapters that explore topics of particular relevance to today’s policy
debates, including the harm of anti-competitive regulatory policies and protectionism, an in-
depth look at work in the shadow economy, and a fresh approach to improving the targeting
and effectiveness of development programs.
• Online tools like customized comparison charts and an interactive heat map.
Economic Freedom: Opportunity and Empowerment
Visit Heritage.org/Index.
1995 2000 2010 2016 2014201020001993 2012201019991993
Average Score in the
Index of Economic Freedom
Global GDP, in Trillions
of 2005 U.S. Dollars
Percent of Global
Population in Poverty
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2016 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2016), http://www.heritage.org/index; The World Bank, World Development Indicators Online,
http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableSelection/selectvariables.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
(accessed December 8, 2015); and The World Bank, PovcalNet, http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm?1
(accessed December 8, 2015). Some figures have been interpolated.
Chart 4 heritage.org
As Economic Freedom Rises, the Global Economy Expands and Poverty Falls
56
57
58
59
60
61
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$59,527
$53,211
$44,353
$32,190
$9,601
$14,328
$5,784
$16,465
$11,869
$9,457
Middle East and
North Africa
Asia-Pacific Europe Americas Sub-Saharan
Africa
■ Five Most Free Nations
■ Five Least Free Nations
GDP per Capita (Purchasing
Power Parity)
Chart 4 heritage.org
Per-Capita Income by Region
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2016 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2016), http://www.heritage.org/index, and International Monetary Fund, World
Economic Outlook Databases, http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28 (accessed December 14, 2015).
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 546-4400
heritage.org