2. Large Font – Title
of the film
Rating of the film
Large caption
from the film
Information
about the
film, e.g.
staring, dire
ctor
Brief
synopsise
Quote summing
up the film
Predicted
interest of
the film
Overall verdict
of the film
= bulk of review
3. Lots of images from
the movie
Title of the
film in
large font
Rating
of the
film
= bulk of
review
Fact sheet
about the film
4. Conclusion
Both reviews show two different ways in which review articles can be done.
The Spider-Man 2 article gives a very detailed perspective of the
film, including many extra information such as their overall rating and the
predicted success of the film.
The bulk of Spider-Man 2 is also much longer than that of Avatar; which
mainly focuses on the technical side of the production, including many shots
of the film itself.
I believe both articles focus on different aspects of filming with Spider-Man 2
looking at how enjoyable the film is in itself and Avatar focusing on the how
the editing and special effects worked with in the film. The articles had the
similarity of both including shots of the film, their opinion of the film and the
rating.
