Deployment and Mobility for Animal Social Life Monitoring Based on Preferential Attachment
1. Deployment and Mobility for Animal Social Life
Monitoring Based on Preferential Attachment
Modelling animal swarms for social life monitoring
Mustafa ˙
Ilhan Akba¸*, Matthias R. Brust*,
s
Carlos H.C. Ribeiro†, Damla Turgut*
*Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
University of Central Florida - Orlando, FL
†Computer Science Division
Technological Institute of Aeronautics - Brazil
December 4, 2011
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 1 / 22
2. 1 Problem definition
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 2 / 22
3. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 2 / 22
4. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 2 / 22
5. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
4 Simulation study
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 2 / 22
6. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
4 Simulation study
5 Conclusion
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 2 / 22
7. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
4 Simulation study
5 Conclusion
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 3 / 22
8. Problem definition
Problem:
Effort and time in wild life monitoring is intensive
Deployment of WSAN enables scalable sampling and data collection
Realistic mobility data is missing for various animal species
Objective
Deployment and mobility algorithms to model a complete system of an
animal swarm to be used for animal social life monitoring
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 4 / 22
9. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
4 Simulation study
5 Conclusion
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 5 / 22
10. System model
Apes equipped with sensor nodes
Actors on group leaders and specific points in the area
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 6 / 22
11. Gorilla social network
Complex, hierarchical social structure with specific roles
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 7 / 22
12. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
4 Simulation study
5 Conclusion
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 8 / 22
13. Preferential attachment based deployment (PABD)
Preferential attachment modified for ape society
P(i) = Probability of adding a link to node i
dn
N if di < dmax
i=1 di
P(i) =
Pc if di ≥ dmax
Roles of nodes defined after network formation
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 9 / 22
14. Preferential attachment based deployment (PABD)
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 10 / 22
15. Center of mass based deployment (CMBD)
Society is divided into subgroups
Subgroup’s COM is leader of higher level group
Can be extended easily for different scenarios
N N
xi yi
xs = ys =
N N
i=1 i=1
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 11 / 22
16. Mobility
L´vy walk is observed in most animal foraging patterns
e
L´vy distribution is Fourier transformation of moving distance of a
e
single random walk
∞
1
fz,α (x) = e −izt φ(t)dt
2π −∞
Silverback moves according to L´vy walk
e
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 12 / 22
17. Preferential attachment based mobility (PABM)
A node moves in the same direction with highest degree neighbor
with Pm (i)
(ra ) − (di )
Pm (i) = + c1 + c2
ra
Troop moves with L´vy walk while providing possibilities for rare
e
behaviors
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 13 / 22
18. Center of mass based mobility (CMBM)
Subgroup leader’s neighbors move s.t. node’s position always at the
center of mass
Controlled mobile network since hierarchical structure always same
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 14 / 22
19. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
4 Simulation study
5 Conclusion
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 15 / 22
21. Degree distribution (PABD vs Pref. Att.)
Power law linearization in log scale not observed in PABD
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 17 / 22
22. Percentages of roles vs. time (1)
Random walk - Most nodes depart from group
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 18 / 22
23. Percentages of roles vs. time (2)
PABM - Probablistic nature observed
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 19 / 22
24. Troop behavior (PABM vs. CMBM vs. RW)
Metric 1: Ratio of current roles to the stationary case
Metric 2: Ratio of solitary animals to all animals in the society.
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 20 / 22
25. 1 Problem definition
2 System model
3 Deployment and mobility
4 Simulation study
5 Conclusion
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 21 / 22
26. Conclusion
Mode deployment and mobility algorithms to provide a complete
system of animal swarm model for animal social life monitoring
Simulation results show PABD and PABM match with the
characteristics of the animal swarm under consideration
Future steps include generalization of the algorithms for other social
systems and employment of field data
Akbas, Brust, Ribeiro, Turgut (UCF,TIA) Deployment and Mobility December 4, 2011 22 / 22