The document discusses the FAA's new "compliance philosophy" which aims to focus more on correcting deviations through education and training rather than punishment. It outlines how the FAA traditionally handled enforcement through actions like civil penalties, certificate revocation/suspension, re-examinations, warning notices, and no action. The new approach uses "compliance actions" which are non-punitive and focus on identifying root causes of deviations and restoring compliance through remedial training within 21 days. However, some exceptions apply and not all FAA offices have fully adopted the new culture yet. The document provides information sources to learn more about the compliance philosophy.
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
FAA Compliance Philosophy Education Over Enforcement
1. The FAA
Compliance Philosophy
Education in place of
Enforcement?
Mark Kolber
Attorney, Commercial Pilot, CFI / CFII
Copyright 2008-2016 Mark J Kolber. All rights reserved.
2. “some deviations arise from factors such as
flawed procedures, simple mistakes, lack of
understanding, or diminished skills”
“deviations of this nature can most
effectively be corrected through root cause
analysis and training”
FAA Order 8000.373, June 26, 2015
3. Who Am I?
Commercial Pilot Certificate
CFI-A / CFI-I
Instruct independently with pilots
in their own aircraft and with
Executive Flight Training at KTTA
FAASTeam Representative
Attorney licensed in North
Carolina, Colorado &
Massachusetts
AOPA Legal Services Panel
4. Disclaimer
General information only
Not legal advice
Cannot replace a personal consultation
with a professional when dealing with a
specific situation
Does not reflect the views of the
FAASafety Team, the FAA or any ASI
Don’t say I didn’t warn you!
5. 10,000-foot View
How it all begins
FAA enforcement process
“Traditional” enforcement options
The new “compliance philosophy”
What it means
6. How it all begins...
Pilot deviations noted by ATC
– “Possible pilot deviation. Suggest you
contact…”
– “I have a number for you to call…”
– Altitude busts are the most common
Ramp checks
Accident/incident investigations
Complaints by citizens
Complaints by other pilots and operators
8. “I Have a Number…”
The most common advice?
Unfortunately, it’s not that simple
It’s never been the only right answer
And perhaps more than ever!
9. FAA Enforcement Options
[Civil Penalties]
Certificate Revocation
Certificate Suspension
“709” Ride
Warning Notice or Letter of
Correction
No Action
10. Traditional FAA Actions
No Action after investigation
– Records expunged after 90 days
Administrative Actions
– Warning Notices and Letter of Correction (Not
considered a “violation” or “enforcement”
– Typically involves some sort of re-training
– Records expunged after 2 years
11. Traditional FAA Actions
“709” Ride
– the Federal Aviation Administration may
…reexamine an airman… 49 U.S.C. § 44709(a)
– Must be “reasonable” based on the trigger
event
– Wise to get and log training
– Can lead to enforcement action and
revocation if refused or failed
12. Traditional FAA Actions
Suspension for a stated period
– FAA Order 2150.3B guidance on penalties
Revocation
– May start over after a year
– Typically for the most serious violations
• Drugs and alcohol use
• Fraudulent entries in logbooks, applications, etc.
• Repeated TFR violations
“Violations” that cannot be expunged
13. “some deviations arise from factors such
as flawed procedures, simple mistakes,
lack of understanding, or diminished skills.
*** deviations of this nature can most
effectively be corrected through root cause
analysis and training”
FAA Order 8000.373, June 26, 2015
announcing the new policy
Compliance Philosophy
14. Foster more open and transparent
exchange of information
Create a “just culture” in which disclosure
is both expected and appreciated
Focus more on correction and less on
punishment through “non-enforcement”
methods to correct unintentional errors
All with the goal of enhancing safety
Compliance Philosophy
15. Outgrowth of ongoing process
Pilots Bill of Rights
Budgetary issues
Formalizing trend toward handling
unintentional deviations without
“violations” on the airman's record
Creation of the “compliance action” in
October, 2015
Compliance Philosophy
16. Compliance Action
“A Compliance Action is intended as an
open and transparent safety information
exchange between FAA personnel and
you. Its only purpose is to restore
compliance and to identify and correct the
underlying causes that led to the
deviation.”
– FAA Compliance Philosophy and Airman
Rights Brochure
19. FAA Enforcement Options
[Civil Penalties]
Certificate Revocation
Certificate Suspension
“709” Ride
Warning Notice or Letter of
Correction
No Action
20. FAA Enforcement Options
[Civil Penalties]
Certificate Revocation
Certificate Suspension
“709” Ride
Warning Notice or Letter of
Correction
No Action
Compliance Action
21. Compliance Action
“A Compliance Action is intended as an
open and transparent safety information
exchange between FAA personnel and
you. Its only purpose is to restore
compliance and to identify and correct the
underlying causes that led to the
deviation.”
– FAA Compliance Philosophy and Airman
Rights Brochure
22. Compliance Action
Pre-enforcement tool
Early decision-making by ASIs under
published guidelines
– First time deviations unless criminal
– Looking for reasons to not bring action
Early Pilots Bill of Rights notification
– Change from original policy
– Use of Compliance Philosophy and Airman
Rights brochure
23. Compliance Action
Pre-enforcement tool
Early decision-making by ASIs under
published guidelines
Early Pilots Bill of Rights notification
– Change from original policy
– Use of Compliance Philosophy and Airman
Rights brochure
24. Compliance Action
Risk-based approach to compliance
– Recognize and mitigate root causes
– Fixes to prevent recurrence
Focus on quick remediation
– goal is a 21-day turn-around
Remedial Training
Follow-up validation
25. Compliance Action
Types of Compliance Actions
– On-the-spot corrections
– Counseling
– Most typically additional or remedial training
Requires written agreement between FAA
and airman
Implemented by FAASTeam Program
Managers
Does not rule out enforcement action
– refusal or inability to participate or comply
27. It takes time to create a new culture
Like any new system, there are bound to
be tweaks and bugs
Not everyone is on board yet
FSDOs for the most part yes, but there are
bound to be exceptions…
Compliance Philosophy
in Practice
28. “obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an
event, does not automatically rule out Compliance
Action. Airmen and organizations are free to
exercise their rights without repercussions.”
FAA Order and Guidance
vs
“Obviously, if you run off and grab an attorney,
you’re not willing and able. You want to get in a
combative stance.”
Regional FAASTeam Program Manager
in nationally available webinar
Compliance Philosophy
in Practice
29. ATC asked to advise orally and request email
to send brochure
FAA Legal Counsel reviewing existing
enforcement actions
Medical branch, no
– Medical certificate falsification and drug testing
programs for commercial operators
Security Office, no
– “Motor Vehicle Action” reporting requirements,
HazMAT violations
Compliance Philosophy
in Practice
30. Compliance Philosophy
It takes time to create a new culture
Not everyone is on board yet
– FSDOs for the most part yes, but there are
bound to be exceptions…
– Medical branch, no
– Security Office, no
No requirement to speak immediately
Still time for advice
– And maybe more reason to!
32. Q&A
You ever been in a cockpit before?
Other questions or copies of this
presentation?
mjk@mkolberlaw.com
www.mkolberlaw.com
www.facebook.com/mkolberlaw
Editor's Notes
Talkk very briefly about these
Revocation – reapply in ____ months and start all over again.
Examples:
Me – no action after informal investigation
No action after response to LOI (emergency and re-flight)
No action after informal conference (flame out in Metroliner)
Examples:
Me – no action after informal investigation
No action after response to LOI (emergency and re-flight)
No action after informal conference (flame out in Metroliner)
Used to be 5 years until post-Colgan crash legislation in 2010
Examples:
Me – no action after informal investigation
No action after response to LOI (emergency and re-flight)
No action after informal conference (flame out in Metroliner)
Compliance Action is a new term to describe the FAA's non-enforcement methods for correcting unintentional deviations or noncompliance that arise from factors such as flawed systems and procedures, simple mistakes, lack of understanding, or diminished skills. A Compliance Action is not adjudication, nor does it constitute a finding of violation
“it is important to determine eligibility for Compliance Action as early as possible and to determine the appropriate type of correspondence needed with the airman/entity.” Order 8900.1 (FSIMS) Vol. 14
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
This can actually float around down to the ALJ hearing
Revocation – reapply in ____ months and start all over again.
Revocation – reapply in ____ months and start all over again.
“it is important to determine eligibility for Compliance Action as early as possible and to determine the appropriate type of correspondence needed with the airman/entity.” Order 8900.1 (FSIMS) Vol. 14
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
“it is important to determine eligibility for Compliance Action as early as possible and to determine the appropriate type of correspondence needed with the airman/entity.” Order 8900.1 (FSIMS) Vol. 14
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
The first thing you get might be a phone call, email or letter including the brochure. Added in February as a way of demonstrating more transparency.
“it is important to determine eligibility for Compliance Action as early as possible and to determine the appropriate type of correspondence needed with the airman/entity.” Order 8900.1 (FSIMS) Vol. 14
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
“it is important to determine eligibility for Compliance Action as early as possible and to determine the appropriate type of correspondence needed with the airman/entity.” Order 8900.1 (FSIMS) Vol. 14
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
“it is important to determine eligibility for Compliance Action as early as possible and to determine the appropriate type of correspondence needed with the airman/entity.” Order 8900.1 (FSIMS) Vol. 14
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
“Obviously, if you run out and get legal counsel, you are not willing and able. You want to get in a combative stance”
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
“Obviously, if you run out and get legal counsel, you are not willing and able. You want to get in a combative stance”
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
“Obviously, if you run out and get legal counsel, you are not willing and able. You want to get in a combative stance”
”refusal to speak with the FAA, or the obtaining of legal counsel immediately after an event, does not automatically rule out Compliance Action.”
“Obviously, if you run out and get legal counsel, you are not willing and able. You want to get in a combative stance”