This document provides guidelines for the Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Standardization and Evaluation program for the 607th Air Support Operations Group and 604th Air Support Operations Squadron. It establishes the organization of the program with Chiefs of Stan/Eval responsible for administering the program for their respective units. It outlines procedures for notifications, conducting evaluations, documentation on AF Form 8s, and additional training requirements. The goal is to ensure personnel are qualified to perform wartime missions according to governing directives.
This document summarizes an FAA presentation on aircraft modifications. It discusses the regulations regarding modifications, including parts 21, 43, 91, and 135. It explains that for an aircraft to be considered airworthy, it must conform to its type design and be in a condition for safe operation. The presentation also discusses major vs minor alterations, field approvals, instructions for continued airworthiness, and other key topics relating to modifying aircraft.
The document is a presentation by Mark L. Laughridge on pilot's airworthiness responsibilities. It defines an airworthy aircraft as one that conforms to its type design and is safe to operate. It discusses the requirements for an aircraft to be considered airworthy, including having a valid airworthiness certificate and registration, complying with all applicable airworthiness directives and maintenance records, ensuring the aircraft is properly weighed and balanced, and that the pilot in command determines the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight before each flight. It also covers topics like inoperative equipment, preventative maintenance, inspections and other responsibilities of aircraft owners and operators to maintain an aircraft in an airworthy condition.
The document discusses aircraft certification and type certificates provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It provides an overview of the FAA's Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) and their role in issuing type certificates and ensuring continued airworthiness. It defines key terms like type design, airworthiness, and the different categories of type certificates (standard, primary, restricted, surplus military, import). It also describes the type certificate data sheet, instructions for continued airworthiness, and how type certificates relate to airworthiness certificates and maintenance regulations.
Joshua Allen Graves has over 10 years of experience maintaining and operating heavy equipment. He currently works as an Equipment Technician for Weatherford Fracturing Technologies in Oklahoma, where he performs preventative maintenance and repairs on diesel engines, blenders, and frac pumps. Previously, he spent 6 years in the U.S. Air Force maintaining KC-135 and C-130 aircraft. He is seeking new opportunities and is willing to relocate to various states in the southern and western U.S.
This document discusses a fatal aircraft accident and analyzes the chain of events and human factors that led to it. It describes how a doctor purchased a modified Mooney aircraft that experienced problems during several flights. Facing a looming insurance deadline, the doctor decided to ferry the aircraft himself. Despite continuing mechanical issues, especially with the propeller installation, the pre-flight checks were rushed. On takeoff, something fell off the aircraft and it crashed, killing the pilot. The summary identifies a series of thoughtless decisions and risky behaviors that ignored applicable human factors, ultimately leading to an undesirable accident that could have been prevented.
This document from the Federal Aviation Administration provides an overview of failure to follow procedures in aircraft maintenance. It discusses regulatory requirements to follow manufacturers' procedures and use approved tools. Common causes of failures include lack of training, resources or preparation. Not following procedures can lead to accidents through a chain of events. The presentation provides safety nets like inspections and checklists to prevent errors and break the chain, and emphasizes following regulations and procedures to maintain safety.
E icao ramp inspection guidance part i 2009-07 r3Ahmed Mogy
At the end of this module, participants will be familiar with ICAO SARPs and related guidance material concerning safety management; and the role of the SSP in ensuring that safety risk controls are established
The document is a presentation by Barry G. Byrd of the Federal Aviation Administration given on March 28, 2012 about failure to follow procedures. It discusses FAA regulations regarding maintenance procedures and performance standards. It provides an overview of causal factors for maintenance errors and uses an accident example where failure to follow procedures led to loss of control during takeoff. The presentation aims to increase awareness of risks from failing to follow procedures and how following preventative measures and safety nets can reduce maintenance errors.
This document summarizes an FAA presentation on aircraft modifications. It discusses the regulations regarding modifications, including parts 21, 43, 91, and 135. It explains that for an aircraft to be considered airworthy, it must conform to its type design and be in a condition for safe operation. The presentation also discusses major vs minor alterations, field approvals, instructions for continued airworthiness, and other key topics relating to modifying aircraft.
The document is a presentation by Mark L. Laughridge on pilot's airworthiness responsibilities. It defines an airworthy aircraft as one that conforms to its type design and is safe to operate. It discusses the requirements for an aircraft to be considered airworthy, including having a valid airworthiness certificate and registration, complying with all applicable airworthiness directives and maintenance records, ensuring the aircraft is properly weighed and balanced, and that the pilot in command determines the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight before each flight. It also covers topics like inoperative equipment, preventative maintenance, inspections and other responsibilities of aircraft owners and operators to maintain an aircraft in an airworthy condition.
The document discusses aircraft certification and type certificates provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It provides an overview of the FAA's Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) and their role in issuing type certificates and ensuring continued airworthiness. It defines key terms like type design, airworthiness, and the different categories of type certificates (standard, primary, restricted, surplus military, import). It also describes the type certificate data sheet, instructions for continued airworthiness, and how type certificates relate to airworthiness certificates and maintenance regulations.
Joshua Allen Graves has over 10 years of experience maintaining and operating heavy equipment. He currently works as an Equipment Technician for Weatherford Fracturing Technologies in Oklahoma, where he performs preventative maintenance and repairs on diesel engines, blenders, and frac pumps. Previously, he spent 6 years in the U.S. Air Force maintaining KC-135 and C-130 aircraft. He is seeking new opportunities and is willing to relocate to various states in the southern and western U.S.
This document discusses a fatal aircraft accident and analyzes the chain of events and human factors that led to it. It describes how a doctor purchased a modified Mooney aircraft that experienced problems during several flights. Facing a looming insurance deadline, the doctor decided to ferry the aircraft himself. Despite continuing mechanical issues, especially with the propeller installation, the pre-flight checks were rushed. On takeoff, something fell off the aircraft and it crashed, killing the pilot. The summary identifies a series of thoughtless decisions and risky behaviors that ignored applicable human factors, ultimately leading to an undesirable accident that could have been prevented.
This document from the Federal Aviation Administration provides an overview of failure to follow procedures in aircraft maintenance. It discusses regulatory requirements to follow manufacturers' procedures and use approved tools. Common causes of failures include lack of training, resources or preparation. Not following procedures can lead to accidents through a chain of events. The presentation provides safety nets like inspections and checklists to prevent errors and break the chain, and emphasizes following regulations and procedures to maintain safety.
E icao ramp inspection guidance part i 2009-07 r3Ahmed Mogy
At the end of this module, participants will be familiar with ICAO SARPs and related guidance material concerning safety management; and the role of the SSP in ensuring that safety risk controls are established
The document is a presentation by Barry G. Byrd of the Federal Aviation Administration given on March 28, 2012 about failure to follow procedures. It discusses FAA regulations regarding maintenance procedures and performance standards. It provides an overview of causal factors for maintenance errors and uses an accident example where failure to follow procedures led to loss of control during takeoff. The presentation aims to increase awareness of risks from failing to follow procedures and how following preventative measures and safety nets can reduce maintenance errors.
The document provides information for aircraft owners on what to expect from mechanics during annual inspections. It outlines that owners are responsible for aircraft airworthiness and should expect mechanics to use approved parts and data, have proper certification and tools, and provide thorough logbook entries documenting inspection results and compliance with airworthiness directives. Owners are advised to carefully vet mechanics and ensure they have a positive safety culture before allowing work to be done.
The document discusses the challenges of certifying ceramic matrix composite (CMC) components for use in commercial aircraft with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It provides an overview of the FAA certification process and requirements, noting that certification is more difficult for CMCs than traditional polymer matrix composites (PMCs) due to differences in material properties. Key certification challenges for CMCs include demonstrating they meet stringent FAA regulations regarding material strength, durability, damage tolerance, and that they will maintain airworthiness over the service life of an aircraft.
This document provides information on supplemental inspections for Cessna 152 aircraft as part of an aging aircraft program. It outlines key terms, inspection requirements and intervals for different operating environments and usage. The inspection documents cover areas like wings, empennage, fuselage and other structural components. The program also includes corrosion prevention and control.
This document summarizes a presentation given to the Utilities, Patrol, and Construction Committee (UPAC) at HeliExpo 2017 by Shawn Hayes from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The presentation covered accident data analysis and trends in the U.S. helicopter industry, the FAA's efforts through the U.S. Helicopter Safety Team (USHST) to reduce accidents, and restrictions on operating restricted category helicopters. Key points included that loss of control inflight, unintended flight into instrument conditions, and low altitude operations accounted for over 50% of 104 fatal helicopter accidents from 2009-2013. The FAA has been evaluating these accident categories and will develop safety enhancements focused on the top industries. The
Aircraft Maintenance Manuals for Engineer's by Engr. Malay Kanti BalaMalay Kanti Bala
Aircraft Maintenance Manual is an important document for the Aircraft Maintenance Personnel. For the airworthiness of any flight, we do an inspection, servicing, repair, removal, installation, etc activities by following the approved documents which in manual or AMM. Here the presentation will disclose and familiarise with different manuals
This document provides a summary of Attique Ur Rehman's professional experience and qualifications. He has over 20 years of experience maintaining and overhauling engines for C-130, Mirage, JF-17 Thunder, and other aircraft. His roles have included quality control supervisor, human resource manager, material control, maintenance job control, and planning and scheduling. He is proficient in maintenance of Mirage and C-130 aircraft engines including overhauling accessories, fuel control units, and testing at engine test cells.
The document discusses inspections required on certificated aircraft according to FAR regulations. It covers the following key points:
- Owners are responsible for maintaining airworthiness and complying with inspections and airworthiness directives.
- Inspections required include annual inspections, 100-hour inspections, and inspections selected from FAA-approved programs depending on the aircraft type and operation.
- Additional inspections include altimeter and static system inspections every 24 months and transponder inspections every 24 months if the aircraft is equipped with a transponder.
This document outlines the Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) training program for the 1st Air Support Operations Group (1 ASOG). It establishes responsibilities, training requirements, and documentation for JTAC qualification and certification. Key points include:
- Initial Qualification Training (IQT) involves prerequisites and recommendation before entering formal JTAC training. Mission Qualification Training (MQT) follows IQT and involves live missions and simulator events.
- Chief JTAC-Is oversee training and ensure local area familiarization for newly assigned JTACs within 30 days. Group/squadron commanders designate JTACs in writing upon completion of requirements.
- Training and qualification are documented in the individual's J
This document provides a summary of an individual's military experience and training. It outlines their occupations in the Navy from 1997 to 2015 as an Aviation Structural Mechanic, Safety Equipment and includes a description of duties in that role. It also lists numerous Navy training courses completed between 1998 and 2011 related to aircraft maintenance, corrosion control, and hazardous materials transportation.
This document is Airman David J. Amn Reekie's individual training record. It lists the various tasks and technical training he has received, including aircraft general systems, electrical systems, propulsion systems, safety procedures, maintenance operations, and more. Each task is listed with the start and completion dates of training, and signatures to verify the training was received. The record will help document Airman Reekie's ongoing technical training.
This document outlines the revisions made to CAR M Continuing Airworthiness Requirements. Revision 1, effective June 2015, was issued to harmonize CAR M with EASA regulations issued after 2010. Key changes include separating appendices, replacing pre-CAR 66 terminology, introducing requirements for critical design configuration control limitations and key risk elements, enhancing the scope of components and defect rectification, and adding new AMC and GM for aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring and fuel tank safety training.
This document is Jason Jungmeyer's unofficial military transcript. It lists the courses and occupations he completed during his service, including recruit training, marksmanship training, infantry training, aviation maintenance training, and correspondence courses. It provides details on each item such as course titles, locations, dates, and credit recommendations from the American Council on Education. The transcript shows Jungmeyer attained the rank of Sergeant E5 and was separated from military service.
This document provides guidelines for exploration activities conducted by contractors in Malaysia. It outlines procedures for submitting and obtaining approval for work programmes and budgets, seismic and non-seismic surveys, well proposals, and reporting requirements. Contractors must obtain PETRONAS' approval for exploration plans and adhere to safety and environmental standards when conducting operations.
This presentation is an examination of structural repair of aircraft. It details the goals, regulations and classification of repairs for different types of aircraft damage.
The paper that this presentation is based on was presented by Dr. Kishore Brahma of the AXISCADES Engineering Core Group at the International Conference & Exhibition on Fatigue, Durability & Fracture Mechanics (FatigueDurabilityIndia2015) in Bangalore from 28-30th May 2015.
The document discusses the requirements for an aircraft to be considered airworthy according to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It defines airworthiness as the aircraft conforming to its type certificate and being properly maintained, and in a condition safe for flight. It outlines the responsibilities of aircraft owners and pilots to ensure the aircraft is in compliance with FAA airworthiness standards and has a valid airworthiness certificate and registration before operation. The document also discusses inspections and repairs required to maintain an aircraft's airworthiness status.
John Kirk McLeod served in the Navy as an Aviation Machinist's Mate and Utilitiesman. His transcript shows that he completed training in areas such as aircraft maintenance, jet engine systems, leadership, plumbing, HVAC, and physics. He held occupations including Airman, Airman Apprentice, and Aviation Machinist's Mate, gaining experience in aircraft maintenance and jet engine maintenance.
This unofficial transcript for Alex Dustin Boschma provides the following information in 3 sentences:
It lists Alex's personal information including name, SSN, rank, and military courses completed between 2003 and 2015 related to his occupation as an Aviation Support Equipment Technician. The courses covered topics such as aircraft towing tractor maintenance, electrical systems, hydraulics, and cryogenic equipment operation. The transcript does not provide any information about courses Alex did not complete.
This document provides guidelines for drilling and well operations in 3 sections. Section 1 discusses drilling programme approval, including wellsite surveys, well positioning, notices of operations, and variations. Section 2 covers recording and reporting requirements such as daily drilling reports and final drilling reports. Section 3 addresses drilling quality assurance and control. Key areas like well design, casing and cementing, blowout preventers, and formation evaluation are outlined. Guidelines are provided for operations including drilling, completions, workovers, and well abandonment. Requirements for onshore drilling are also included.
- The document compares existing Civil Aviation Safety Regulations to proposed new Parts 42, 66, 145 and 147 regulations.
- Key changes include introducing outcome-based legislation with acceptable means of compliance, separating continuing airworthiness management from maintenance activities, and requiring regular public transport operators to use approved continuing airworthiness management and maintenance organizations.
- Implementation will transition existing privileges to new licensing categories over time without loss of privileges.
This document provides instructions for reporting, investigating, and handling deviations from standard operating procedures and processes. It defines deviations as planned or unplanned and categorizes them based on their severity and impact on product quality. The procedure outlines the process for reporting deviations, investigating the root cause, implementing corrective and preventive actions, evaluating their effectiveness, and trending analysis. Quality assurance is responsible for approving deviation reports and deciding if batches can be released.
Meeting the SAE JA1011 Evaluation Criteria for RCM ProcessesRobert GoForth
The document discusses the requirements in SAE JA1011 for Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) processes and demonstrates how the NAVAIR 00-25-403 RCM process meets these requirements. It provides a side-by-side comparison of the requirements in SAE JA1011 and excerpts from NAVAIR 00-25-403 and related training materials that address each requirement. The requirements cover the general RCM process, as well as specific steps around identifying functions, failure modes, failure effects, and consequences. The document aims to conclusively illustrate compliance between the two processes.
The document provides information for aircraft owners on what to expect from mechanics during annual inspections. It outlines that owners are responsible for aircraft airworthiness and should expect mechanics to use approved parts and data, have proper certification and tools, and provide thorough logbook entries documenting inspection results and compliance with airworthiness directives. Owners are advised to carefully vet mechanics and ensure they have a positive safety culture before allowing work to be done.
The document discusses the challenges of certifying ceramic matrix composite (CMC) components for use in commercial aircraft with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It provides an overview of the FAA certification process and requirements, noting that certification is more difficult for CMCs than traditional polymer matrix composites (PMCs) due to differences in material properties. Key certification challenges for CMCs include demonstrating they meet stringent FAA regulations regarding material strength, durability, damage tolerance, and that they will maintain airworthiness over the service life of an aircraft.
This document provides information on supplemental inspections for Cessna 152 aircraft as part of an aging aircraft program. It outlines key terms, inspection requirements and intervals for different operating environments and usage. The inspection documents cover areas like wings, empennage, fuselage and other structural components. The program also includes corrosion prevention and control.
This document summarizes a presentation given to the Utilities, Patrol, and Construction Committee (UPAC) at HeliExpo 2017 by Shawn Hayes from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The presentation covered accident data analysis and trends in the U.S. helicopter industry, the FAA's efforts through the U.S. Helicopter Safety Team (USHST) to reduce accidents, and restrictions on operating restricted category helicopters. Key points included that loss of control inflight, unintended flight into instrument conditions, and low altitude operations accounted for over 50% of 104 fatal helicopter accidents from 2009-2013. The FAA has been evaluating these accident categories and will develop safety enhancements focused on the top industries. The
Aircraft Maintenance Manuals for Engineer's by Engr. Malay Kanti BalaMalay Kanti Bala
Aircraft Maintenance Manual is an important document for the Aircraft Maintenance Personnel. For the airworthiness of any flight, we do an inspection, servicing, repair, removal, installation, etc activities by following the approved documents which in manual or AMM. Here the presentation will disclose and familiarise with different manuals
This document provides a summary of Attique Ur Rehman's professional experience and qualifications. He has over 20 years of experience maintaining and overhauling engines for C-130, Mirage, JF-17 Thunder, and other aircraft. His roles have included quality control supervisor, human resource manager, material control, maintenance job control, and planning and scheduling. He is proficient in maintenance of Mirage and C-130 aircraft engines including overhauling accessories, fuel control units, and testing at engine test cells.
The document discusses inspections required on certificated aircraft according to FAR regulations. It covers the following key points:
- Owners are responsible for maintaining airworthiness and complying with inspections and airworthiness directives.
- Inspections required include annual inspections, 100-hour inspections, and inspections selected from FAA-approved programs depending on the aircraft type and operation.
- Additional inspections include altimeter and static system inspections every 24 months and transponder inspections every 24 months if the aircraft is equipped with a transponder.
This document outlines the Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) training program for the 1st Air Support Operations Group (1 ASOG). It establishes responsibilities, training requirements, and documentation for JTAC qualification and certification. Key points include:
- Initial Qualification Training (IQT) involves prerequisites and recommendation before entering formal JTAC training. Mission Qualification Training (MQT) follows IQT and involves live missions and simulator events.
- Chief JTAC-Is oversee training and ensure local area familiarization for newly assigned JTACs within 30 days. Group/squadron commanders designate JTACs in writing upon completion of requirements.
- Training and qualification are documented in the individual's J
This document provides a summary of an individual's military experience and training. It outlines their occupations in the Navy from 1997 to 2015 as an Aviation Structural Mechanic, Safety Equipment and includes a description of duties in that role. It also lists numerous Navy training courses completed between 1998 and 2011 related to aircraft maintenance, corrosion control, and hazardous materials transportation.
This document is Airman David J. Amn Reekie's individual training record. It lists the various tasks and technical training he has received, including aircraft general systems, electrical systems, propulsion systems, safety procedures, maintenance operations, and more. Each task is listed with the start and completion dates of training, and signatures to verify the training was received. The record will help document Airman Reekie's ongoing technical training.
This document outlines the revisions made to CAR M Continuing Airworthiness Requirements. Revision 1, effective June 2015, was issued to harmonize CAR M with EASA regulations issued after 2010. Key changes include separating appendices, replacing pre-CAR 66 terminology, introducing requirements for critical design configuration control limitations and key risk elements, enhancing the scope of components and defect rectification, and adding new AMC and GM for aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring and fuel tank safety training.
This document is Jason Jungmeyer's unofficial military transcript. It lists the courses and occupations he completed during his service, including recruit training, marksmanship training, infantry training, aviation maintenance training, and correspondence courses. It provides details on each item such as course titles, locations, dates, and credit recommendations from the American Council on Education. The transcript shows Jungmeyer attained the rank of Sergeant E5 and was separated from military service.
This document provides guidelines for exploration activities conducted by contractors in Malaysia. It outlines procedures for submitting and obtaining approval for work programmes and budgets, seismic and non-seismic surveys, well proposals, and reporting requirements. Contractors must obtain PETRONAS' approval for exploration plans and adhere to safety and environmental standards when conducting operations.
This presentation is an examination of structural repair of aircraft. It details the goals, regulations and classification of repairs for different types of aircraft damage.
The paper that this presentation is based on was presented by Dr. Kishore Brahma of the AXISCADES Engineering Core Group at the International Conference & Exhibition on Fatigue, Durability & Fracture Mechanics (FatigueDurabilityIndia2015) in Bangalore from 28-30th May 2015.
The document discusses the requirements for an aircraft to be considered airworthy according to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It defines airworthiness as the aircraft conforming to its type certificate and being properly maintained, and in a condition safe for flight. It outlines the responsibilities of aircraft owners and pilots to ensure the aircraft is in compliance with FAA airworthiness standards and has a valid airworthiness certificate and registration before operation. The document also discusses inspections and repairs required to maintain an aircraft's airworthiness status.
John Kirk McLeod served in the Navy as an Aviation Machinist's Mate and Utilitiesman. His transcript shows that he completed training in areas such as aircraft maintenance, jet engine systems, leadership, plumbing, HVAC, and physics. He held occupations including Airman, Airman Apprentice, and Aviation Machinist's Mate, gaining experience in aircraft maintenance and jet engine maintenance.
This unofficial transcript for Alex Dustin Boschma provides the following information in 3 sentences:
It lists Alex's personal information including name, SSN, rank, and military courses completed between 2003 and 2015 related to his occupation as an Aviation Support Equipment Technician. The courses covered topics such as aircraft towing tractor maintenance, electrical systems, hydraulics, and cryogenic equipment operation. The transcript does not provide any information about courses Alex did not complete.
This document provides guidelines for drilling and well operations in 3 sections. Section 1 discusses drilling programme approval, including wellsite surveys, well positioning, notices of operations, and variations. Section 2 covers recording and reporting requirements such as daily drilling reports and final drilling reports. Section 3 addresses drilling quality assurance and control. Key areas like well design, casing and cementing, blowout preventers, and formation evaluation are outlined. Guidelines are provided for operations including drilling, completions, workovers, and well abandonment. Requirements for onshore drilling are also included.
- The document compares existing Civil Aviation Safety Regulations to proposed new Parts 42, 66, 145 and 147 regulations.
- Key changes include introducing outcome-based legislation with acceptable means of compliance, separating continuing airworthiness management from maintenance activities, and requiring regular public transport operators to use approved continuing airworthiness management and maintenance organizations.
- Implementation will transition existing privileges to new licensing categories over time without loss of privileges.
This document provides instructions for reporting, investigating, and handling deviations from standard operating procedures and processes. It defines deviations as planned or unplanned and categorizes them based on their severity and impact on product quality. The procedure outlines the process for reporting deviations, investigating the root cause, implementing corrective and preventive actions, evaluating their effectiveness, and trending analysis. Quality assurance is responsible for approving deviation reports and deciding if batches can be released.
Meeting the SAE JA1011 Evaluation Criteria for RCM ProcessesRobert GoForth
The document discusses the requirements in SAE JA1011 for Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) processes and demonstrates how the NAVAIR 00-25-403 RCM process meets these requirements. It provides a side-by-side comparison of the requirements in SAE JA1011 and excerpts from NAVAIR 00-25-403 and related training materials that address each requirement. The requirements cover the general RCM process, as well as specific steps around identifying functions, failure modes, failure effects, and consequences. The document aims to conclusively illustrate compliance between the two processes.
The document is a Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) for the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) that outlines the integrated test program and resources needed to test and evaluate the EFV system. Key points include:
- The EFV is an amphibious assault vehicle being developed for the US Marine Corps to deploy troops from ships to shore under hostile conditions.
- The test program includes developmental testing to verify requirements are met and operational testing to validate performance. Multiple live fire, terrain, and maritime tests are planned over several years.
- Resources needed for testing include prototype vehicles, test sites with various terrain types, live fire ranges, Navy assets, and trained Marine Corps personnel. Facilities from H
FY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon SystemTom "Blad" Lindblad
This document provides an overview of the fiscal year 2015 budget request for major weapon systems acquisition costs by the United States Department of Defense, totaling $153.9 billion. It outlines funding for key programs organized by mission area categories including aircraft and related systems, C4I systems, ground systems, missile defense programs, missiles and munitions, shipbuilding and maritime systems, space based systems, and mission support activities. Major defense acquisition programs account for $69.6 billion or 45% of the total modernization funding request.
This document provides an overview and summary of API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, which provides guidance for conducting Fitness-For-Service (FFS) assessments to demonstrate the structural integrity of in-service components that may contain flaws or damage. It describes the background, scope, assessment levels, acceptance criteria, procedures, and organization of the standard. The standard can be used to qualify components for continued operation or re-rating using different assessment levels from simplified screening to detailed analysis.
Purpose
This procedure provides the System Operator assigned to the Transmission and Security Desk with detailed procedures required for performing duties assigned to that position.
The Transmission and Security Operator shall ensure that the transmission system is operated so that instability, uncontrolled separation, or cascading outage will not occur as a result of the most severe single Contingency. The Transmission and Security Operator directs ERCOT Transmission Operators or other Market Participants as required while maintaining or restoring the security/reliability of the ERCOT System.
1.2 Scope
The instructions contained in this procedure are limited to those required for the Transmission and Security Desk. Instructions for other ERCOT control room positions are contained in separate procedures, one for each position. This procedure does not imply that the duties contained herein are the only duties to be performed by this position. The individual assigned to this position will be required to follow any other instructions and to perform any other duties as required or requested by appropriate ERCOT supervision. Although the steps within the procedures are numbered, the numbering is for indexing purposes and are not sequential in nature. The system operator will determine the sequence of steps, exclude steps, or take any additional actions required to ensure system security based on the information and situational awareness available during both normal and emergency conditions.
1.3 Roles/Responsibilities
ERCOT System Operator, Transmission & Security Desk
The ERCOT System Operator – Transmission and Security Desk position represents the following NERC functional entities collectively for the ERCOT ISO at any time:
• Reliability Coordinator
• Balancing Authority
• Transmission Operator
• Interchange Coordinator
This representation includes the responsibility and clear decision making authority during normal and emergency conditions to direct and implement real-time actions to ensure the stable and reliable operation of the ERCOT electric system. These actions shall include shedding of firm load to prevent or alleviate System Operating Limit
The document appears to be an audit report containing findings from internal audits conducted across multiple production units (64, 65, 73, 74). Key findings include failure to follow systems/procedures around change management, control plans, training records maintenance, inspection processes, and validation activities. Root cause analyses and corrective actions are documented for each nonconformance along with references to supporting evidence.
The document provides an analysis of the FY-09 Boat Forces and Cutter Operations Standardization Assessment. Key points:
- 159 units were visited, with 120 completing assessments. 107 units (89%) were found ready for operations and 13 (11%) were not ready.
- 464 small boats were reported on, with 386 evaluated. Upon arrival, 204 were Bravo, 19 Bravo Restricted, and 163 Charlie.
- Readiness has increased slightly over the past 3 years, with average scores of 39 in FY-09, 39 in FY-08, and 39 in FY-07.
- Detailed analysis is provided on specific boat types like ANBs,
This document provides guidance for renewing an Inspection Authorization (IA). To renew an IA, applicants must show evidence of meeting requirements in 14 CFR 65.91, including being actively engaged in maintenance. They must also show evidence of completing 8 hours of refresher training annually, performing at least 8 annual inspections in the last 2 years, and passing an oral test from an FAA inspector. The oral test should include around 10 questions to ensure the applicant's knowledge is current. Meeting renewal requirements renews the IA for another 2-year period until the next odd-numbered year expiration of March 31.
This document outlines the rules and procedures for WKF referee courses and qualifications. It discusses the Referee Commission structure and responsibilities, course content, qualifications awarded, and general regulations. The key points are:
- The Referee Commission consists of a chairman and 10 members responsible for referee certification and deployment at WKF events.
- Courses include rule explanations, theory exams, and practical assessments to qualify officials as judges and referees at different levels.
- Qualifications are provisional until confirmed at a subsequent WKF event, and officials must maintain standards to retain qualifications.
- General regulations cover candidate eligibility, uniforms, briefings, and avoiding conflicts of interest for fair competition.
This document is the table of contents for Volume 1 of the 757-200 Flight Crew Operations Manual. It lists the chapters and sections contained in Volume 1, including the preface, limitations, normal procedures, supplementary procedures, and performance inflight chapters. The preface also provides information on the manual's purpose and organization, as well as definitions of warnings, cautions and notes used. Model identification and airplane registration numbers covered by the manual are specified.
This document provides quality guidelines and recommendations for Samsung's Small Cell Field Test (SCFT) process. It outlines objectives to ensure accurate SCFT validation and improve quality. Guidelines are provided for circles, central SCFT optimizers, and the WCC2 quality assurance team. Key points addressed include throughput thresholds, handling of KPI failures, drive route guidelines, escalation processes, and responsibilities of various roles. The overall goal is to minimize errors and re-drives to accelerate the WCC approval process.
This document outlines the rules and regulations of the Referee Commission and Referee Course. It discusses the composition of the Referee Commission, their powers and responsibilities which include examining and certifying referees. It then details the requirements for hosting the Referee Course including venue, facilities, and financial responsibilities of the host country. The document also covers qualifications attained through the course, course content, uniform regulations, and general rules for candidates and referees.
This document outlines the rules and regulations of the Referee Commission and Referee Course. It discusses:
- The structure and responsibilities of the Referee Commission, including overseeing referee qualifications and performance.
- Requirements for hosting the annual Referee Course, including facilities, dates, and responsibilities of the host country.
- The content and format of the Referee Course, including theory lectures, exams, and practical assessments in kata and kumite.
- The process for earning referee qualifications up to the level of Karate Referee, and maintaining qualifications through ongoing assessments.
- General regulations for candidates and referees, including uniforms, attendance requirements, and
This document outlines requirements for certification of Aviation Training Organizations (ATOs) that provide aircraft maintenance technician (AMT) training courses. It specifies the general certification process and defines key terms. It also describes curriculum requirements for AMT airframe, powerplant, avionics and combined rating courses. Requirements are listed for AMT training program providers, instructors, attendance policies, and credit for prior instruction or experience.
This document outlines the rules for seeding swimmers into heats, semi-finals, and finals for FINA competitions. It specifies that swimmers should be seeded based on their submitted entry times, from fastest to slowest. For events with multiple heats, the fastest swimmers should be distributed across the heats based on set patterns to ensure the fastest swimmers are in the last heats. Lanes within each heat are assigned in descending order of submitted times, following a set pattern. The number of swimmers seeded in each heat depends on the total number of heats but aims for a minimum of three swimmers per heat when possible.
This document outlines Rex's procedures for managing ground support equipment (GSE). It discusses duties and responsibilities, inspections, maintenance, and the GSE website and database used to track equipment. Key points include:
- The National Airports Manager and GSE Mechanics are responsible for GSE oversight and maintenance.
- Inspections of GSE are conducted weekly or monthly according to an item's risk level and logged on the GSE website.
- Routine maintenance of GSE is scheduled every 3, 6, or 12 months depending on the item.
- Electrical equipment is classified and tracked according to risk level, with more frequent inspections and testing required for high-risk items.
This document provides a summary of closed resolutions from the IAQG Resolutions Log. It contains 25 resolutions addressing various issues related to auditor requirements, standards, registrar approvals and accreditation across the aerospace quality sectors. The resolutions clarify sector operations and provide guidance on implementing common rules and processes across the sectors.
This document provides guidance on interpreting ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection bodies seeking accreditation. It was produced by the Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (APLAC) Technical Committee. The guidance clarifies requirements around scope of accreditation, independence, quality systems, personnel, facilities, equipment, and records. It is intended to help inspection bodies understand what will be examined during accreditation assessments.
This document provides procedures for air traffic control planning, coordination, and services during defense activities and special military operations. It outlines responsibilities and requirements for the Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Defense personnel. The procedures are to be used for operations in all airspace controlled by or under the jurisdiction of the FAA. It also provides guidance on exercise planning and coordination, altitude reservation procedures, and control of air defense aircraft.
Similar to Expired 607 ASOG Standards & Evaluation Program (20)
1. BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2
607TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS GROUP
01 November 2009
Space, Missile, Command, and Control
JOINT TERMINAL ATTACK CONTROLLER
(JTAC) STANDARDIZATION/EVALUATION
PROGRAM
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
NOTICE: This publication is available digitally on the 607 ASOG share drive and the 604 ASOS share drive.
OPR: 607 ASOG/OGV Certified by: 607 ASOG/CC
Supersedes: 607 ASOG OI 13-112, Volume 2, 8 Dec 2008 (Col Richard A. Forster)
Pages: 20
Distribution: F
This Operating Instruction (OI) provides guidelines for the implementation of AFI 13-112 Volume 2, dated 21
February 2008 incorporating Change 1, 18 May 09, and all subsequent supplements/changes. This OI contains
procedures and policies for the 607th Air Support Operations Group (ASOG) and 604th Air Support Operations
Squadron (ASOS) Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Standardization/Evaluation Programs. Waiver
authority is 607 ASOG/CC.
PURPOSE. This OI establishes local policies, procedures, and standards for the 607 Air Support Operations
Group (607 ASOG) and 604 Air Support Operations Squadron (604 ASOS) Standardization/Evaluation IAW
AFI 13-112V2 Terminal Attack Controller Standardization/Evaluation Program.
APPLICABILITY. Procedures set forth in this operating instruction apply to all qualified 607 ASOG and 604
ASOS JTACs, JTAC Trainees, and Standardization/Evaluation Examiners (SEE) that are assigned, attached
and/or transient (TDY) to the Korean Peninsula. All members will be familiar with and enforce the policies of
this OI.
1. STANDARDIZATION AND EVALUATION PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND
RESPONSIBILITIES
1.1. Standardization and Evaluation Organization:
1.1.1. Due to the small size and distance between the 607 ASOG and 604 ASOS, each unit will have a separate
Stan/Eval program using a combined 607th
ASOG OI 13-112V2.
1.1.2. The 607 ASOG Chief of Stan/Eval (OGV) runs this program for 607 ASOG/CC.
2. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
2
1.1.3. 607 ASOG/OGV will consist of the Chief of Stan/Eval. The 607 ASOG will maintain at least one
additional duty SEE.
1.1.4. The 604 ASOS Chief of Stan/Eval (DOV) runs this program for the 604 ASOS/CC
1.1.5. 604 ASOS/DOV will consist of the Chief of Stan/Eval and at least one permanent or additional duty SEE.
Duties and Responsibilities
1.2.1, the 607 ASOG Chief of Stan/Eval will:
1.2.1.1. Administer the JTAC Standardization and Evaluation Program for the Group Commander IAW
governing directives to ensure that unit members are qualified to perform their wartime missions.
1.2.1.2. Brief the Commander on all discrepancies during the semi-annual Standardization Evaluation Board
(SEB).
1.2.1.3. Review all evaluation folders of newly assigned JTAC personnel to establish their currency and mission
qualifications IAW paragraph 2.
1.2.1.4. Manage the 607 ASOG ground phase testing program IAW paragraph 7 of this OI.
1.2.1.5. Develop a checklist for 607 ASOG SEEs to use during evaluations.
1.2.1.6. Develop and maintain evaluation profiles and scenarios IAW paragraph 6 of this OI.
1.2.1.7. Establish and maintain a trend analysis program IAW paragraph 8 of this OI.
1.2.1.8. Establish and maintain an Inspector General cross-tell information systems for JTAC related items in
the 607 ASOG/OGV continuity book.
1.2.1.9. Manage and ensure compliance with the Controller Read File (CRF) publications program, IAW
paragraph 5 of this OI.
1.2.2 The 604 ASOS Chief of Stan/Eval will:
1.2.2.1. Administer the JTAC Standardization and Evaluation Program for the Squadron Commander IAW
governing directives to ensure that unit members are qualified to perform their wartime missions.
1.2.1.2. Brief the Commander on all discrepancies during the semi-annual SEB.
1.2.2.3. Review all evaluation folders of newly assigned JTAC personnel to establish their currency and
mission qualifications IAW paragraph 2.
1.2.2.4. Manage the 604 ASOS Ground Phase testing program IAW paragraph 7 of this OI.
1.2.2.5. Establish and maintain a trend analysis program IAW paragraph 8 of this OI.
1.2.2.6. Manage and ensure compliance with the CRF publications program IAW paragraph 5 of this OI.
2. JTAC EVALUATION FOLDERS
2.1. JTAC Evaluation Folder.
2.1.1.607 ASOG and 604 ASOS DOT Chief JTAC-I will maintain JTAC Evaluation Folders on all individuals
who are JTAC qualified IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 1.7.1. This is to include individuals who do not maintain
JTAC certification.
2.1.2. The six part sectional folder will be organized according to AFI 13-112V1, para 6.2, dated 15 February
2008 incorporating change 1, 4 May 2009.
2.2. In-Processing and Review.
2.2.1. 607 ASOG/OGV and 604 ASOS/DOV will conduct initial and annual reviews of JTAC Evaluation
Folders part IV. The review will determine the individual’s currency and evaluation zone. OGV/DOV will
update the AF Form 942 indicating assignment to PACAF and each review.
2.2.2. Any discrepancies that are considered minor will be documented on the Minor Discrepancy Log
(Attachment10).
3. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
3
3. CONDUCT OF EVALUATIONS
3.1. Notification Procedures.
3.1.1. 30 days prior to an individual entering their evaluation eligibility zone, the unit Chief of Stan/Eval will
complete the Evaluation Eligibility Zone Notification MFR (Attachment 2) IAW 607 ASOG OI. SEEs will
conduct a pre-evaluation check using the (Attachment 1) as a guide, but is not the sole source for the pre-check.
3.1.2. This MFR will be routed to the individual’s supervisor who will ensure that the individual is aware of
their evaluation eligibility. The supervisor will also coordinate with the Chief JTAC-I to identify any
Continuation Training (CT) requirements that will expire by the end of the eligibility zone.
3.2. Ground-Phase.
3.2.1. Unit Chief of Stan/Eval will coordinate with the examinee and supervisor to schedule the ground-phase of
the evaluation. All efforts should be made to accomplish the ground-phase prior to the control-phase unless a
no-notice evaluation is being given.
3.2.2. If an individual fails the ground-phase evaluation, they will be placed in “Supervised Status” and re-
examined IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 2.3.1.
3.2.3. OGV/DOV will notify the Chief JTAC-I, supervisor, DO and CC of the results of failures via MFR
(Attachment 5 or Attachment 6).
3.3 Control-Phase.
3.3.1. SEEs will use the 607 ASOG JTAC evaluation checklist (Attachment 4) while conducting the control-
phase portion of the evaluations. All evaluations will be IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 2.4 - 2.4.5.
3.3.2. Unit Chief of Stan/Eval will notify the individual and the supervisor when the control-phase has been
scheduled.
3.3.3. When possible, the SEE will be identified at least one week prior to the scheduled control-phase date.
3.3.4. The SEE will issue the initial profile a minimum of 24 hours prior to the mission. The profile should
include any base information allowing the examinee to prepare equipment and begin mission planning. The
scenario should be issued as early as possible on the day of the mission. The SEE should be prepared to provide
inputs as simulated staff agencies or to provide additional fidelity to the scenario.
3.3.4.1. During no-notice evaluations, the SEE conducting the evaluation will coordinate with the individual’s
supervisor to prevent any scheduling conflicts. The SEE will then notify the individual NET 24 hours prior to
the scheduled mission VUL time.
3.3.5. If the examinee fails the control-phase, re-evaluation will be IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 2.4.6.
3.3.6. Chief of Stan/Eval will notify the Chief JTAC-I, supervisor, DO and CC of the results via MFR
(Attachment 7).
3.3.7. If the examinee fails the RQ evaluation, Chief of Stan/Eval will notify the unit commander via MFR
(Attachment 8).
3.4 Evaluation Debriefing.
3.4.1. The evaluation debriefing will be IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 2.4.7
3.4.2. An evaluation with an overall rating of Q-1 requires only the examinee and supervisor to be present
during the debriefing.
3.4.3. In the event that the supervisor is unavailable, the next individual in the examinee’s chain of command
will attend the debriefing.
4. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
4
3.5. No-Notice Evaluation Procedures.
3.5.1. Commander or DO of 607th
ASOG and 604th
ASOS respectively will approve OGV/DOV to administer
No-Notice evaluations to JTACs. This approval does not have to be documented. Do not conduct No-Notice
evaluations during the last month of the examinee’s eligibility period (exceptions require 607 ASOG/CC or 604
ASOS/CC approval respectively). All No-Notice evaluations will be IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 2.2.4.
3.6. Spot Evaluation Procedures.
3.6.1. Spot evaluations will be used to evaluate any discrepancies noted on an individual JTAC or to check a
JTAC’s proficiency. SPOT evaluations will be IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 2.2.6.
3.6.2. Spot evaluations may be accomplished by any unit SEE at any time with prior approval from the
Commander. Also, the Chief JTAC-I may request that a spot evaluation be accomplished based upon
recommendations from any JTAC-I on noted performance of an individual JTAC while performing a mission.
4. AF FORM 8 COMPLETION AND ROUTING
4.1. Preparation. SEEs will complete the AF Form 8 IAW AFI 13-112V2, A6.1 depending on the type of
evaluation.
4.1.1. All SEEs will complete the AF Form 8, including signatures, within 15 calendar days pending mission
requirements such as TDYs or deployments (won’t tie our hands due to unforeseen circumstances).
4.1.2. The reviewing official will be the either Deputy Commander at Group and Director of Operations at
Squadron, or highest non-deployed/TDY officer.
4.2. Additional Training Procedures.
4.2.1. Additional training will be IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 2.4.7.2. 607th
ASOG/OGV will annotate the
required training on the AF Form 8 after reviewing with DOT.
4.2.2. DOT will ensure training has been completed and will sign additional training block of the AF Form 8.
4.2.3. If requested by supervisor, DO or Commander, 607th
ASOG/OGV will schedule a spot evaluation after
the additional training completion date.
4.2.4. Spot evaluations that do not require aircraft will be scheduled within 30 days after the additional training
has been completed. Spot evaluations that do require aircraft will be scheduled as soon as aircraft are available.
5. CONTROLLER READ FILE (CRF)
5.1. Location.
5.1.1. The Controller Read File is maintained by the 607th
ASOG Chief of Stan/Eval and 604th
ASOS Chief of
Stan/Eval respectively, and will be in a location that is accessible to controllers and will be IAW AFI 13-112V2,
chapter 6.
5.1.2. The CRF Binder and JTAC CRF cards will be maintained by the 607th
ASOG/OGV and kept in the
Stan/Eval office. 604th
ASOS/DOV will maintain cards located at the “Operations Duty Desk” in building.
5.1.3. An electronic version of the CRF will also be maintained on the unit shared drive under the CRF
Publications.
5.1.3.1 CRF publications volume 2 can also be located at A3DC-TACP/ASOC on the AF portal or use the web
address https://www.my.af.mil/gcss-af/USAF/ep/globalTab.do?channelPageId=-1746022 note: website is
maintained by ACC/A3DC, currency of publications need to be verified prior to use.
5. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
5
5.1.4. JTACs are encouraged to download publications to CDs for use during deployment and exercises;
however, the JTAC is responsible for periodically checking for updates and new publications.
5.2. Controller Read File Messages.
5.2.1. CRF messages may be generated by MAJCOM, NAF or 607 ASOG.
5.2.2. Rescinded messages will be retained for 6 months prior to disposal.
5.2.3. If JTACs are TDY when a new message has been issued that is of an immediate safety concern,
OGV/DOV, DOT or the DO will contact the deployed senior JTAC either telephonically or electronically and
relay the contents.
5.2.4. The senior deployed/TDY JTAC will brief other JTACs of the message contents.
5.2.5. The senior deployed/TDY JTAC will then contact OGV/DOV, DOT or the DO either telephonically or
electronically and report when all JTACs under their control have been briefed. The person contacted will then
annotate on the deployed JTACs CRF cards, “Brief telephonically, electronically, etc…”
5.4. Controller Read File Review.
5.4.1. On the first duty day of each month 607th
ASOG/OGV will flip all JTAC CRF cards to red indicating that
a review is necessary. Each JTAC will review the CRF and annotate the review in the Monthly Review column
of the CRF card.
5.4.2. Visiting JTACs controlling CAS missions on the Korean peninsula will review the CRF, per 607
ASOG/CC directives and sign off on the “Visiting JTAC” CRF Card.
5.5. Go/No-Go Procedures.
5.5.1. Go/No-go procedures will be accomplished by the senior JTAC participating in the mission. The senior
JTAC will review the GO/NO-GO tracker as maintained by the 607/604 Chief JTAC-Is. Any person
participating in the mission will not control unsupervised if they are identified as No-Go.
5.5.2. The senior JTAC will ensure that the CAS TDY Worksheet is completed and forward to the DO for
review prior to participating in a mission.
6. SCENARIOS
6.2. Evaluation Scenarios. Scenarios will focus on procedures used within the DOC primary theater and
possible deployment theaters. Scenarios should incorporate current TTPs relevant to on-going contingency
operations.
6.2.2. Most 607 ASOG and 604 ASOS scenarios will be developed for operations at OP2, OP3 and Pilsung
Range.
6.2.3. Scenarios will be reviewed annually.
7. GROUND-PHASE EXAMINATION PROGRAM
7.1. Master Question File. 607th
ASOG/OGV will generate examinations for the ground phase after
coordinating with DOT.
7.1.1. OGV will utilize the ACC JTAC MQF test bank.
7.1.2. 604th
ASOS/DOV will develop and maintain the Local Procedures MQF (LPMQF) for all JTACs
stationed on the Korean peninsula.
7.1.3. 604th
ASOS/DOV and the 607th
ASOG/OGV will review the ACC JTAC MQF, LPMQF and review
reference publications for validity annually or as required.
7.1.4. The focus will be on questions identified during SEBs.
6. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
6
7.1.5. All recommendations for corrections, deletions or changes will be passed to 604th
ASOS/DOV by the 15th
of June and December.
7.1.6. 607 ASOG Chief of Stan/Eval will create four tests with answer and reference sheets. These tests will be
stored in the locked filing cabinet located in the 607th
ASOG/OGV office, and 604th
ASOS/DOV office
respectively.
8. TREND ANALYSIS PROGRAM
8.1. Trend Analysis.
8.1.1607th
ASOG/OGV will conduct the trend analysis on all 607 ASOG JTAC evaluations.
8.1.1.1. Due to the low number of overall JTAC evaluations conducted in 607 ASOG, data from the previous
semi-annual period will also be included to determine trends.
8.1.1.2. OGV will coordinate with DOT to review the trend items and emphasis areas.
8.1.1.3. A trend is an item that has shown a discrepancy rate of 20% during the ground phase and/or the control
phase.
8.1.1.4. When a trend has been identified in the control phase, an analysis of the area’s discrepancy and training
methods/tools will be analyzed.
8.1.1.5. OGV and DOT will recommend corrective actions to the Commander during the Stan/Eval Board.
8.1.1.6. If a trend is discovered in the ground-phase evaluation, 607 ASOG Chief of Stan/Eval will forward the
discrepancy to PACAF.
8.1.2. 604th
ASOS/DOV will conduct the trend analysis on all 604th
ASOS JTAC evaluations.
8.1.2.1. DOV will coordinate with DOT to review the trend items and emphasis areas.
8.1.2.2. Any item identified in either the control phase or ground phase evaluations as a discrepancy or
positive/negative trend will be sent to 607th
ASOG/OGV for inclusion to the semi-annual SEB.
8.2. Stan/Eval Special Interest Items (SII).
8.2.1. The MAJCOM, NAF, Group and/or Squadrons can establish JTAC Stan/Eval SIIs IAW AFI 13-112V2,
para 6.9.
8.2.2. If designated as a Stan/Eval SII, 607 ASOG Chief of Stan/Eval will determine applicable evaluation
standards and grading criteria.
8.3. Stan/Eval Board.
8.3.1. 607 ASOG will conduct a Stan/Eval Board (SEB) IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 5.1.
8.3.1.1. Board will be held semi-annually, normally in the last half of January and July. The 607 ASOG Chief
of Standardization and Evaluation should coordinate with the 604 ASOS Chief of Standardization and
Evaluation to determine when the group level SEB will be held.
8.3.1.2. 607th
ASOG/OGV will prepare the agenda and SEB presentation.
8.3.2. 604th
ASOS will conduct a SEB IAW AFI 13-112V2, para 5.1.
8.3.2.1. Every effort will be made to accomplish the semi-annual board no less than one week prior to
scheduled 607th
ASOG SEB.
9. SEE UPGRADE PROCEDURES AND TRAINING PROGRAM
9.1. Recommendation. The 607th
ASOG Chief of Stan/Eval will recommend to the DO possible candidates as
permanent or additional duty SEEs.
9.1.1. IAW AFI 13-112V2 para 7.2.6. Personnel selected for this position must be a qualified JTAC-I.
7. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
7
9.1.2. The Group/Squadron Commander will make the final decision on who enters the SEE Upgrade Program.
607th
ASOG/CC is the waiver authority for SEE candidates.
9.2. SEE Upgrade Training Program. Once selected, the individual will be entered into the SEE Upgrade
Program. A copy of the SEE Upgrade Training Program can be found on the Group/Squadron shared drives.
9.2.1. IAW AFI 13-112V2 para 7.2.5. The SEE upgrade training completion will be documented on an MFR
(Attachment 3) and maintained in the individual’s training records.
9.3. SEE Certification.
9.3.1. SEEs do not require a recurring objectivity evaluation. Individuals with a valid SEE Objectivity
Evaluation from another unit could receive a SPOT objectivity evaluation if directed by the Group Commander
before performing SEE duties.
9.3.2. If the SEE fails an initial or a directed SPOT objectivity evaluation, OGV/DOV will notify the
Group/Squadron Commander via MFR (Attachment 9). The Commander will make the determination for a re-
evaluation.
RICHARD A. FORSTER, Col, USAF
Commander, 607th Air Support Operations Group
8. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
8
ATTACHMENT SECTION
(Added) Attachment 1 – JTAC Pre-Evaluation Considerations 3.1.1
(Added) Attachment 2 – JTAC Evaluation Eligibility Notification 3.1.1
(Added) Attachment 3 – SEE Upgrade Program 9.2.1
(Added) Attachment 4 – JTAC EVAL Checklist 3.3.1
(Added) Attachment 5 – First Ground Phase Failure 3.2.3
(Added) Attachment 6 – Second Ground Phase Failure 3.2.3
(Added) Attachment 7 – First Control Phase Failure 3.3.6
(Added) Attachment 8 – Second Control Phase Failure 3.3.7
(Added) Attachment 9 – SEE Objectivity Failure 9.3.2
(Added) Attachment 10 – Minor Discrepancy Log 2.2.1
9. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
9
Attachment 1
607 ASOG JTAC PRE-EVALUATION SEE Checklist
This checklist will be used in conjunction with AFI 13-112, Volume 2, Table 2.1; it is not used
as the sole source for the Evaluation Phase
JTAC Evaluatee: ___________________ Control Phase Date: __________ Completion
Date:__________
PRE-EVALUATION CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Verify information on the notification memorandum (Attachment 2).
2. Have on-hand, as a minimum, the following publications (hard copy or electronic):
-- AFI 13-112, Volumes 1 and 2
-- 607 ASOG Stan/Eval Operating Instruction (OI) 13-112V2
-- Any publication pertaining to operations on specific ranges in the KTO. Link is (Z:) 607
ASOG, DO, OGV, Ranges
-- 607 ASOG approved SEE Guide. Link is (Z:) 607 ASOG, DO, OGV, SEE Guide
3. Prior to conducting the control phase, you will brief the examinee on the following:
-- AFI 13-112, Volume 2, para. 2.4. thru 2.4.6.
-- Evaluation objectives, areas to be evaluated, grading criteria, and safety and emergency
procedures requiring the SEE to take over the mission.
-- Role-players and any assistants participating and what their capabilities/limitations will be.
-- Mission scenario, any preliminary planning information, and timelines or directions
applicable to local range procedures.
4. To conduct the control phase of the evaluation use AFI 13-112, Volume 2, para. 2.4. through
2.4.7.2. Use the grading criteria found in AFI 13-112, Volume 2, Table 2.1, Areas 1-24. Use the
criteria in AFI 13-112, Volume 2, para. 2.5. to assign overall qualification.
5. Follow guidance in 607 ASOG Stan/Eval OI 13-112V2, Chapter 4 for AF Form 8 completion
and routing.
10. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
10
Attachment 2
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS SEVENTH AIR FORCE (AIR FORCES KOREA)
MEMORANDUM FOR TSgt Best Supervisor
FROM: 607 ASOG/OGV
SUBJECT: JTAC/SEE Objectivity Evaluation Eligibility Period
SUPERVISOR
1. On DD MMM YY, SSgt Joint T. Control enters his eligibility zone for a recurring/initial,
JTAC/SEE Objectivity evaluation. This evaluation will become overdue if not accomplished by
DD MMM YY.
2. It is your responsibility to ensure he is prepared for the evaluation and that all training
requirements in AFI 113-112V1 and AFI 13-113V1 are met prior to scheduling the ground- and
control-phases. Accomplish a thorough review of the JTAC’s AF Form 623 and other training
documentation (i.e. Excel Database).
3. Notify the 607 ASOG/OGV or 604th
ASOS/DOV (as applicable), Stan/Eval, section as soon
as he is ready to be scheduled for the evaluation.
EXAMINEE
1. Per the above information, you enter your annual evaluation zone on DD MMM YY. You
and your supervisor must work together to ensure you are prepared and that all prerequisites are
complete prior to administering the evaluation.
2. Your supervisor will inform 607 ASOG/OGV or 604th
ASOS/DOV (as applicable) when you
have completed all of your prerequisites. At that time you will be scheduled for ground- and
control-phase evaluations. You will receive a minimum of 24 hours notice unless it is a no-
notice evaluation.
___________________________ __________________________
Supervisor’s signature / Date Examinee’s signature / Date
STAN E. VAL, TSgt, USAF
Chief of Stan/Eval
11. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
11
Attachment 3
607 ASOG SEE UPGRADE PROGRAM
_____________________has been nominated by 607 ASOG/CC for Permanent/Additional
SEE duties IAW AFI 13-112, VOLUME 2 Chapter 7. Upon completion of this checklist
and completion of AF Form 8 with CC approval, member will then be able to perform SEE
duties.
1. Initial Orientation Briefing. (Given by CSE or DO)
A. Areas of Responsibility
B. Conduct of JTAC Evaluations
C. Applicable AFIs, OIs, Checklists, and Forms (Self study material)
- AFI 11-214
- 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2
- JTAC Evaluation Checklist
- AF Form 8, 942
- Stan/Eval Continuity Book
D. Special Interest Items
DATE COMPLETED: _________________ Certifying Official_________________
2. Self Study.
A. AFI 13-112, Volume 1, Joint Terminal Attack Controller Training Program
B. AFI 13-112, Volume 2, Joint Terminal Attack Controller Standardization/Evaluation
Program
C. Applicable AFIs, OIs, Checklists, and Forms (see above)
DATE COMPLETED: _________________ Certifying Official_________________
3. Review and Comprehend Self Study Material. A review of the self-study material will be
accomplished with the Chief of Stan/Eval (or designated SEE).
DATE COMPLETED: _________________ Certifying Official_________________
4. Evaluation Performance Training. SEE trainee will observe JTAC evaluation (from
preparation to paperwork complete).
DATE COMPLETED: _________________ Certifying Official_________________
5. SEE Evaluation. See trainee will be evaluated IAW AFI 13-112, Volume 2, Table 2.1, Item
25 and para. 7.5.
DATE COMPLETED: _________________ Certifying Official_________________
6. Chief of Stan/Eval Only. The outgoing Chief of Stan Eval will conduct thorough training and
review of Stan/Eval program specifics.
12. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
12
DATE COMPLETED: _________________ Certifying Official_________________
7. Certification/Documentation.
A. Individual is SEE certified when the Group/Squadron Commander signs the AF Form
8
B. Certification form will be filed in individual’s Stan/Eval folder
C. Certification will be further noted on individual’s AF Form 623a
D. Update the SEE’s qualification on the 607 ASOG Letter of Xs
E. Ensure proper appointment letter is completed and filed IAW paragraph 1.4 of this
operating instruction
13. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
13
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS SEVENTH AIR FORCE (AIR FORCES KOREA)
MEMORANDUM FOR 607 ASOG/CC
FROM: 607 ASOG/OGV
SUBJECT: Failure of First Ground–Phase Evaluation
1. SSgt Joint T. Control failed a ground-phase evaluation on DD MMM YY. His score of
##% is below the minimum passing score of 86% outlined in AFI13-112V2, para. 2.3.1.
2. All questions requiring additional study were reviewed with OGV immediately following
the examination. IAW AFI13-112V2, para 2.3.1, SSgt Control must wait 24 hours prior
to a re-examination. This re-examination must be successfully accomplished within 30
calendar days of the initial test, and is due NLT DD MMM YY.
3. In addition, IAW AFI13-112V2, para. 2.3.1.1, SSgt Control will not control live aircraft
without the supervision of the Chief of Stan Eval, a qualified SEE or a qualified JTAC-
Instructor until the re-examination is passed.
4. Any questions or comments may be directed to TSgt Stan E. Val, 607 ASOG/OGV, at
DSN 784-2384.
STAN E. VAL, TSgt, USAF
Chief of Stan/Eval
Concur/Non-Concur
14. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
14
JOHN Q. COMMANDER, Colonel, USAF
Commander
Attachment 6
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS SEVENTH AIR FORCE (AIR FORCES KOREA)
MEMORANDUM FOR 607 ASOG/CC
FROM: 607 ASOG/OGV
SUBJECT: Failure of Second Ground–Phase Evaluation
1. SSgt Joint T. Control failed a second ground-phase evaluation on DD MMM YY. His
score of ##% is below the minimum passing score of 86% outlined in AFI13-112V2,
para. 2.3.1.
2. All questions requiring additional study were reviewed with OGV immediately following
the examination. IAW AFI13-112V2, para 2.3.1, SSgt Control must wait 24 hours prior
to a re-examination. This re-examination must be successfully accomplished within 30
calendar days of the initial test, and is due NLT DD MMM YY.
3. In addition, IAW AFI13-112V2, para. 2.3.1.1, SSgt Joint T. Control will not control
live aircraft without the supervision of the Chief of Stan Eval, a qualified SEE, or a
qualified JTAC-Instructor until the re-examination is passed.
4. Any questions or comments may be directed to TSgt Stan E. Val, 607 ASOG/OGV, at
DSN 784-2384.
STAN E. VAL, TSgt, USAF
Chief of Stan/Eval
Concur/Non-Concur
15. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
15
JOHN Q. COMMANDER, Colonel, USAF
Commander
Attachment 7
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS SEVENTH AIR FORCE (AIR FORCES KOREA)
MEMORANDUM FOR 607 ASOG/CC
FROM: 607 ASOG/OGV
SUBJECT: Failure of First Control–Phase Evaluation
1. SSgt Joint T. Control failed a control-phase evaluation on DD MMM YY. His overall
qualification of Q-3 is below the minimum standard outlined in AFI13-112V2, para. 2.5.2.
2. IAW AFI 13-112, Volume 2, para. 2.4.6., a re-evaluation must be completed no later than 90
days after completing all additional training. The additional training completion date is: DD
MMM YY. A minimum of 24 hours must elapse before the re-evaluation.
3. In addition, IAW AFI13-112V2, para. 2.4.6.1.2,. SSgt Control will not control live aircraft
without the supervision of the Chief of Stan Eval, a qualified SEE or a qualified JTAC-
Instructor until the re-evaluation is passed.
4. Any questions or comments may be directed to TSgt Stan E. Val, 607 ASOG/OGV, at DSN
784-2384.
STAN E. VAL, TSgt, USAF
Chief of Stan/Eval
Concur/Non-Concur
16. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
16
JOHN Q. COMMANDER, Colonel, USAF
Commander
Attachment 8
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS SEVENTH AIR FORCE (AIR FORCES KOREA)
MEMORANDUM FOR 607 ASOG/CC
FROM: 607 ASOG/OGV
SUBJECT: Failure of Second Control–Phase Evaluation (unqualified)
1. SSgt Joint T. Control failed the second control-phase evaluation on DD MMM YY. His
overall qualification of Q-3 is below the minimum standard outlined in AFI13-112V2, para.
2.5.2.
2. IAW AFI 13-112, Volume 2, para. 2.4.6.3., SSgt Joint T. Control is unqualified due to
second failure of the control phase evaluation.
3. In addition, IAW AFI13-112V2, para. 2.4.6.1.2,. SSgt Control will not control aircraft
without the supervision of the Chief of Stan Eval, a qualified SEE, or a qualified JTAC-
Instructor until a successful evaluation is accomplished.
4. Any questions or comments may be directed to TSgt Stan E. Val, 607 ASOG/OGV, at DSN
784-2384.
STAN E. VAL, TSgt, USAF
Chief of Stan/Eval
Concur/Non-Concur
JOHN Q. COMMANDER, Colonel, USAF
17. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
17
Commander
Attachment 9
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS SEVENTH AIR FORCE (AIR FORCES KOREA)
MEMORANDUM FOR 607 ASOG/CC
FROM: 607 ASOG/OGV
SUBJECT: Failure of STAN/EVAL EXAMINER (SEE) Initial/SPOT Objectivity Evaluation
1. TSgt Joint T. Control failed an objectivity evaluation on DD MMM YY. His overall
qualification of Q-3 is below the minimum standard outlined in AFI13-112V2, para. 7.5.1.2.
2. TSgt Control will not be reinstated as a SEE or be allowed to perform SEE duties. The
Group Commander must recommend a reevaluation. The examinee will not be
reinstated until a successful completion of a reevaluation.
3. Any questions or comments may be directed to TSgt Stan E. Val, 607 ASOG/OGV, at DSN
784-2384.
STAN E. VAL, TSgt, USAF
Chief of Stan/Eval
Concur/Non-Concur
JOHN Q. COMMANDER, Colonel, USAF
Commander
18. 607 ASOG OI 13-112V2, 01 NOVEMBER 2009
18
Attachment 10
607 ASOG
Stan/Eval Minor Discrepancy Log
Date of
AF Form
8
Block
with
Discrep.
Date
Discrep.
Found
Description of Discrepancy
Reviewer’s
Initials