Evaluation of online learning (Rubric to evaluate online courses)



  Evolution items             Your comments                     Degree (1-5)
                    The first thing that you see when
                    looking at the course is its design. Is
                    the design pleasing to the eye? Is the
     Design         site cluttered or difficult to navigate?
                    Are there any glaring design flaws or
                    glitches, or is the site a work of art?

                    What is the focus of the course? If
                    you can’t figure it out, then the author
                    is doing something wrong. Focus
      Focus         should be apparent without hunting
                    around too much. Typically by using
                    design elements, or simple headlines
                    or sub-headlines a site must convey
                    its focus.

                    The most obvious element to cover in
                    your review is the course’s content.
                    Does the content of the course match
      Content       its focus? If not, there is a problem! Is
                    the content easily readable? Does it
                    make sense? What are some of the
                    highlights? Is there a page, article or
                    section of the course that really stands
                    out as being fantastic?
                    Writing style is one element that
                    many people often ignore. Does the
                    author share his/her voice? Do you
                    find yourself relating to what you
   Writing Style
                    read? Is the style professional or does
                    the author blabs on about their dying
                    goldfish in every post?
Does the course use proper
                       grammatical elements? Are there
   Grammar and
                       spelling mistakes and punctuation
    Punctuation
                       errors all over the place?

                      Overall, do you find that the site is
Message Effectiveness effective in putting out its message?

                       Who is the intended audience for this
                       site or blog? Are the intended and
  Course Audience
                       actual audiences different?

Evalution

  • 1.
    Evaluation of onlinelearning (Rubric to evaluate online courses) Evolution items Your comments Degree (1-5) The first thing that you see when looking at the course is its design. Is the design pleasing to the eye? Is the Design site cluttered or difficult to navigate? Are there any glaring design flaws or glitches, or is the site a work of art? What is the focus of the course? If you can’t figure it out, then the author is doing something wrong. Focus Focus should be apparent without hunting around too much. Typically by using design elements, or simple headlines or sub-headlines a site must convey its focus. The most obvious element to cover in your review is the course’s content. Does the content of the course match Content its focus? If not, there is a problem! Is the content easily readable? Does it make sense? What are some of the highlights? Is there a page, article or section of the course that really stands out as being fantastic? Writing style is one element that many people often ignore. Does the author share his/her voice? Do you find yourself relating to what you Writing Style read? Is the style professional or does the author blabs on about their dying goldfish in every post?
  • 2.
    Does the courseuse proper grammatical elements? Are there Grammar and spelling mistakes and punctuation Punctuation errors all over the place? Overall, do you find that the site is Message Effectiveness effective in putting out its message? Who is the intended audience for this site or blog? Are the intended and Course Audience actual audiences different?