This document outlines an evaluation plan for an English I class at a high school in Puebla, Mexico for the 2011-2012 school year. It evaluates students on their knowledge through tests, writing, listening, and speaking. It also evaluates students on their process and products like laboratory activities, papers, homework, and notebook activities. Finally, it evaluates students' conscious attitude development based on grammar, pronunciation, understanding instructions, participation, timeliness, and notebook organization. Students can earn a total of 10 points and must earn 24 points to get the highest grade of excellent. The evaluation plan aims to be in accordance with curricular reforms in the state.

1. HIGH SCHOOL “CADETE JUAN ESCUTIA”
SUBJECT: ENGLISH I
EVALUATION SCHOOL YEAR: 2011 – 2012
In accordance with the curricular reform and the MOEVA in the state´s high school in Puebla, I propose the next form to
evaluation the subject English II for the first grade group “A”:
ASPECTS TO EVALUATE POINTS
KNOWLEDGE
TESTS.
writting
Listening 3
Speaking
Participations 1
SUBTOTAL 4
PROCESS AND PRODUCTS
Laboratory´s activities 0.5
Paper´s activities 0.5
Homeworks 0.5
Notebook´s activities 0.5
Book´work 1
SUBTOTAL 3
CONSCIOUS ATTITUDE DEVELOPMENT
Characteristics to observe:
a) Identify the grammar forms and correct writing.
b) Correct pronuntation
c) Understand the instructions in the second language.
d) Active participation
e) Delivery on time
f) Complete book´s activities
g) Complete notebook´s activities
h) Notebook: order, clean, etc.
All the aspects will be consider in the next scale:
E = excellent = 3
G = good = 2
R = regular = 1
I = insufficient = 0
The 3 points will be given to the students that add 24 points. The points for the others students will be steady.
SUBTOTAL 3
TOTAL 10
NOTE:
1. DON’T´ ACEPT EXTRA POINTS FOR ANY ACTIVITY EXTRA CLASS THAT THE STUDENTS REALIZE, ONLY THE
EXCEPTIONS WHEN THE STUDENTS HAVE A GOOD ACADEMIC PERMORMANCE.
2. FOR DISPOSITION THE SCHOOL´PRINCIPAL, THE STUDENT THAT NOT GET TWOPOINTS IN KWONLEDGE, NOT PUT
THEIR POINTS IN PROCESS AND PRODUCTS AND ATTITUDE.
ATTENTIVELY
AUGUST, 22nd. 2011
PROFESSOR. ROMAN SERRANO CLEMENTE