During a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence against men and boys in conflict Prof. Laurel Fletcher of UC Berkeley discussed ways in which the legal framework could be strengthened to address sexual violence against men and boys in conflict.
This presentation contains the definition of custodial violence as well as its types and the laws to prevent it.
*Please open in Microsoft PPT for high definition and best effects :)
Human rights violation_in_custodial_tortureAvinash Rajput
This document provides an overview of custodial torture in India. It defines torture, describes common torture methods and types (police vs. judicial custody), presents statistics on custodial deaths from 2000-2011, outlines relevant international and domestic legal frameworks, and provides three case examples each of torture in police and judicial custody.
Is capital punishment appropriate in india.gagan deep
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, remains a controversial issue in India. While India retains capital punishment for serious crimes like murder, it is only used in the "rarest of rare" cases as determined by the Supreme Court. Arguments for retaining capital punishment include that it acts as a deterrent against serious crimes and is necessary to eliminate dangerous criminals. However, others argue that capital punishment should be abolished as it is a form of judicial murder if an innocent person is executed, and that life imprisonment allowing criminals to reform themselves and support victim families is a better alternative. There are ongoing debates around ensuring fair trials and protecting human rights for those sentenced to death. The appropriate use and potential abolition of capital punishment continues to be discussed in India
This document provides an in-depth overview of capital punishment in India and around the world, including:
- A brief history of capital punishment practices from ancient times to the present.
- An overview of the major religions' stances on capital punishment.
- Details on the implementation and controversies around capital punishment in countries like the US, China, India and others.
- International frameworks and treaties related to abolition of the death penalty.
By this presentation, people may get an idea as to what is the position of capital punishment in the world. what are the measures to abolish it or do we really need to abolish it? Happy learning.
Schmalleger Chapter 2 The crime picture – chapter 2gregory riley
The document discusses various topics related to crime statistics and criminal justice in the United States. It provides an overview of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting program and the National Crime Victimization Survey as the two major sources of national crime data. It also discusses historical crime trends, types of offenses like murder, sexual assault, and robbery. Key facts are presented about the characteristics of different crimes and victims.
This presentation contains the definition of custodial violence as well as its types and the laws to prevent it.
*Please open in Microsoft PPT for high definition and best effects :)
Human rights violation_in_custodial_tortureAvinash Rajput
This document provides an overview of custodial torture in India. It defines torture, describes common torture methods and types (police vs. judicial custody), presents statistics on custodial deaths from 2000-2011, outlines relevant international and domestic legal frameworks, and provides three case examples each of torture in police and judicial custody.
Is capital punishment appropriate in india.gagan deep
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, remains a controversial issue in India. While India retains capital punishment for serious crimes like murder, it is only used in the "rarest of rare" cases as determined by the Supreme Court. Arguments for retaining capital punishment include that it acts as a deterrent against serious crimes and is necessary to eliminate dangerous criminals. However, others argue that capital punishment should be abolished as it is a form of judicial murder if an innocent person is executed, and that life imprisonment allowing criminals to reform themselves and support victim families is a better alternative. There are ongoing debates around ensuring fair trials and protecting human rights for those sentenced to death. The appropriate use and potential abolition of capital punishment continues to be discussed in India
This document provides an in-depth overview of capital punishment in India and around the world, including:
- A brief history of capital punishment practices from ancient times to the present.
- An overview of the major religions' stances on capital punishment.
- Details on the implementation and controversies around capital punishment in countries like the US, China, India and others.
- International frameworks and treaties related to abolition of the death penalty.
By this presentation, people may get an idea as to what is the position of capital punishment in the world. what are the measures to abolish it or do we really need to abolish it? Happy learning.
Schmalleger Chapter 2 The crime picture – chapter 2gregory riley
The document discusses various topics related to crime statistics and criminal justice in the United States. It provides an overview of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting program and the National Crime Victimization Survey as the two major sources of national crime data. It also discusses historical crime trends, types of offenses like murder, sexual assault, and robbery. Key facts are presented about the characteristics of different crimes and victims.
Custodial torture is a major issue in India that violates human rights. When individuals are in police custody or prison, they are at high risk of physical or psychological abuse aimed at extracting confessions or punishments. The Indian Constitution prohibits custodial torture under Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. However, reports show that torture continues to be practiced by law enforcement and occurs in many forms, such as beatings, suffocation, and denial of medical care. The Supreme Court of India has ruled that any form of torture or inhuman treatment is unconstitutional. Stronger legal protections and law enforcement accountability are still needed to prevent custodial abuse in India.
The document discusses capital punishment in India. It outlines several common execution methods such as gas chamber, electric chair, and lethal injection. It notes that between 1975-1991 around 40 people were executed in India, though the exact number is disputed. The document also discusses the Indian Penal Code provisions for which capital punishment is allowed and some controversial Supreme Court cases related to the death penalty. More than two-thirds of countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice, with 140 countries total being abolitionist. The document concludes by arguing that the death penalty is a cruel punishment and that India should review its stance on capital punishment.
Genocide and crime against humanity finalPalak Agrawal
This document discusses genocide and crimes against humanity. It defines genocide as mass killing intended to destroy a group as defined by the perpetrator. The UN defines genocide as killing, harming, inflicting conditions to destroy a group, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children. Genocide requires intent to destroy a group in whole or part. Examples discussed include the Armenian genocide and decisions from international criminal tribunals related to Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia. Crimes against humanity include murder, genocide, slavery, torture, rape and apartheid.
The execution of the innocent believed guilty is a miscarriage of justice that must be opposed whenever detected.
But such miscarriage of justice cannot warrant abolition at the death penalty. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages, human activities including the penal system with all its punishments are morally justified. It is necessary to protect the rights of a group of people, death penalty is vital to protect a person’s right to live. If not so, then is the arresting someone same as kidnapping someone?
Should the Capital Punishment be removed or not?Rajdeep Banerjee
Should Capital Punishment be removed from the existing Indian Law or not?
The topic itself is quite 'debatable'.
However, I managed to substantiate it a bit with some information collected from the Internet, still was not satisfied with the outcome. So, I made a survey on the common people of Bhubaneswar to know what they want.
I took down the datas collected from their yes/no response and compiled them into a graph which gave me a much clearer overview.
I hope that my presentation might be helpful to you all and know the current scenario of people's mindset to some extent.
Thank you.
By Rajdeep Banerjee
The Human Rights Council discusses questioning historical cases of genocide through international law. The document recognizes atrocities in Cambodia under the Pol Pot regime as violations of human rights law. It believes international cooperation is important to condemn the Khmer Rouge's actions but warns against misusing the term "genocide" to preserve the integrity of genocide conventions. The council reiterates the need to evaluate the Cambodia case as a crime against humanity to ensure accountability.
This document discusses how international human rights apply to victims of domestic violence. It summarizes two landmark court cases (Jessica Lenahan v. United States and Opuz v. Turkey) that found states had violated victims' human rights by failing to protect them from domestic abuse. The document also outlines how the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees rights to non-discrimination, personal freedom and safety, and protection from torture and degrading treatment, and how domestic violence violates these rights.
The document discusses the death penalty and its use in the Philippines. It begins by stating that the death penalty violates fundamental human rights and is a cruel punishment. It then lists the crimes that can receive the death penalty in the Philippines, including aggravated murder, terrorism, and drug trafficking. The document also discusses how the death penalty was abolished in the Philippines in 1987 under the constitution but later reinstated in 1993 to address rising crime rates, before being abolished again in 2006. It concludes by stating there is little evidence the death penalty deters crime more than life imprisonment.
The document discusses the history of the death penalty in the Philippines, including:
- The 1987 constitution abolished capital punishment and commuted over 500 death sentences from martial law.
- In 1992, President Ramos wanted to restore the death penalty but Congress did not take action.
- In 1996, lethal injection was mandated for death sentences and the first execution by this method occurred in 1999.
- In 2000, President Arroyo signed legislation again abolishing the death penalty.
A delegation of U.S. human and civil rights organizations participated in the United Nation's review of the U.S.'s compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The delegation highlighted failures of the U.S. to adequately address human rights violations and sought reforms to protect rights like freedom from torture, the death penalty, and solitary confinement. The ICCPR review examined U.S. compliance with the treaty and provided an opportunity for the Obama administration to address human rights concerns and recommendations.
Universal Jurisdiction Under the Rome Statute- GC (2)Ovo Imoedemhe
This document outlines a presentation on universal jurisdiction under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. It discusses traditional principles of jurisdiction, defines universal jurisdiction, and outlines limits on its use. It describes the ICC's jurisdiction and justifications for universal jurisdiction, such as denying safe havens for perpetrators and closing impunity gaps. However, it also discusses arguments against universal jurisdiction, such as threats to sovereignty. The conclusion is that while there seems to be consensus on universal jurisdiction in theory among states, it remains controversial in practical application due to sovereignty concerns. The ICC also does not exercise pure universal jurisdiction due to its complementarity and cooperation regimes.
EXTRAJUDICIAL, ARBITRARY, AND SUMMARY EXECUTIONS IN NIGERIAABA IHRC
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999), as amended, by S.33(1) provides that “[e]very persons has a right to life, and no one shall be deprived intentionally of his life, save in execution of the sentence of a Court in respect of a criminal offence of which he has been found guilty in Nigeria.”
Despite the Constitution's clear mandates, there have been daily, gross violations of this Constitutional safeguard to the right to life by security operatives, particularly the Nigeria police. -Osas Justy Erhabor, Esq., IHRC Vice Chair of Special Projects
The document discusses proposed amendments to articles in a constitution relating to women's rights, freedom of the press, and presidential elections. It proposes amendments to guarantee equal rights for women, prohibit all censorship of media, limit presidents to two terms, and require presidential candidates be nominated by political parties. It references quotes from thinkers like Wollstonecraft, Jefferson, and the US Bill of Rights to support empowering citizens and limiting government overreach.
The document discusses capital punishment and the death penalty. It provides information on how capital punishment is a legal process where a person is put to death by the state as punishment for a crime. It notes that currently 58 nations actively practice capital punishment, while 140 countries have abolished it. It discusses arguments for and against the death penalty, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, closure for victims' families, and the possibility of wrongful convictions. It also summarizes Islam's views on capital punishment and the crimes for which it can be administered under Islamic law.
The document defines torture according to international law as severe pain intentionally inflicted by officials for purposes such as obtaining information or punishment. Torture is prohibited by the Afghan constitution and penal code. The AIHRC's 2013 monitoring found 73 instances of torture in detention centers, with common forms being beating, suspension, and genital torture.
This document provides an overview of genocide as an international crime. It discusses the history and definition of genocide, including the key acts and groups protected. The requirements to constitute genocide are outlined. Questions on aspects like intent, rape, and punishment are addressed. International cases involving genocide that have been heard by the International Court of Justice are summarized. The document concludes by discussing the global acceptance and continued evolution of the genocide regime.
The United Nations Convention against Torture is an international treaty that aims to prevent torture around the world. It defines torture and establishes the Committee Against Torture to monitor states' compliance. States must prevent torture, not extradite people where torture may occur, provide due process, and educate their personnel about prohibiting torture. The Convention defines torture and sets forth state obligations and individual rights regarding torture.
The document discusses constitutional protections and a Supreme Court case related to hijras (transgender people) in Pakistan. It summarizes that Article 9, 25, and 26 of Pakistan's constitution prohibit deprivation of life/liberty and discrimination based on sex. A 2011 Supreme Court case ordered the government to officially recognize hijras as a separate gender and allow people to identify that way on national IDs. This was important as IDs are needed for many activities. The document also discusses organizations advocating for hijra rights like gender equality in Pakistan.
The document discusses the main motivations that drove early explorers to explore new lands: religion/God, glory/fame, and gold/riches. It provides examples of several prominent explorers from history - Henry the Navigator of Portugal, Christopher Columbus of Spain, Ferdinand Magellan, Ponce de Leon, and Vasco de Balboa of Spain - and examines whether their driving forces were God, glory, or gold. The document poses the question of what the reader's motivations might be if they were an explorer in that era.
The document summarizes the motives and means of European exploration and expansion in the 15th and 16th centuries. The three main motives were religion ("God"), profit ("Gold"), and increasing power and national pride ("Glory"). Key means included new technologies, powerful monarchs, and early leaders like Prince Henry and explorers like da Gama, Columbus, and Magellan. Their voyages established European control over trade with Asia and led to conquests in the Americas and the Columbian Exchange of plants, animals, and diseases between Europe and the Americas, transforming global societies and economies.
Europeans explored for several key reasons:
1) Spices were highly valued but could only be obtained from Asia, so European rulers sought a sea route to access spices more cheaply and make their countries wealthy.
2) Gold represented wealth and power, and explorers hoped to find gold in new lands to enrich their home nations.
3) Powerful monarchs like the Kings of Spain and Portugal wanted to expand their empires across new territories for resources and slave labor to increase their dominance.
Custodial torture is a major issue in India that violates human rights. When individuals are in police custody or prison, they are at high risk of physical or psychological abuse aimed at extracting confessions or punishments. The Indian Constitution prohibits custodial torture under Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. However, reports show that torture continues to be practiced by law enforcement and occurs in many forms, such as beatings, suffocation, and denial of medical care. The Supreme Court of India has ruled that any form of torture or inhuman treatment is unconstitutional. Stronger legal protections and law enforcement accountability are still needed to prevent custodial abuse in India.
The document discusses capital punishment in India. It outlines several common execution methods such as gas chamber, electric chair, and lethal injection. It notes that between 1975-1991 around 40 people were executed in India, though the exact number is disputed. The document also discusses the Indian Penal Code provisions for which capital punishment is allowed and some controversial Supreme Court cases related to the death penalty. More than two-thirds of countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice, with 140 countries total being abolitionist. The document concludes by arguing that the death penalty is a cruel punishment and that India should review its stance on capital punishment.
Genocide and crime against humanity finalPalak Agrawal
This document discusses genocide and crimes against humanity. It defines genocide as mass killing intended to destroy a group as defined by the perpetrator. The UN defines genocide as killing, harming, inflicting conditions to destroy a group, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children. Genocide requires intent to destroy a group in whole or part. Examples discussed include the Armenian genocide and decisions from international criminal tribunals related to Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia. Crimes against humanity include murder, genocide, slavery, torture, rape and apartheid.
The execution of the innocent believed guilty is a miscarriage of justice that must be opposed whenever detected.
But such miscarriage of justice cannot warrant abolition at the death penalty. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages, human activities including the penal system with all its punishments are morally justified. It is necessary to protect the rights of a group of people, death penalty is vital to protect a person’s right to live. If not so, then is the arresting someone same as kidnapping someone?
Should the Capital Punishment be removed or not?Rajdeep Banerjee
Should Capital Punishment be removed from the existing Indian Law or not?
The topic itself is quite 'debatable'.
However, I managed to substantiate it a bit with some information collected from the Internet, still was not satisfied with the outcome. So, I made a survey on the common people of Bhubaneswar to know what they want.
I took down the datas collected from their yes/no response and compiled them into a graph which gave me a much clearer overview.
I hope that my presentation might be helpful to you all and know the current scenario of people's mindset to some extent.
Thank you.
By Rajdeep Banerjee
The Human Rights Council discusses questioning historical cases of genocide through international law. The document recognizes atrocities in Cambodia under the Pol Pot regime as violations of human rights law. It believes international cooperation is important to condemn the Khmer Rouge's actions but warns against misusing the term "genocide" to preserve the integrity of genocide conventions. The council reiterates the need to evaluate the Cambodia case as a crime against humanity to ensure accountability.
This document discusses how international human rights apply to victims of domestic violence. It summarizes two landmark court cases (Jessica Lenahan v. United States and Opuz v. Turkey) that found states had violated victims' human rights by failing to protect them from domestic abuse. The document also outlines how the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees rights to non-discrimination, personal freedom and safety, and protection from torture and degrading treatment, and how domestic violence violates these rights.
The document discusses the death penalty and its use in the Philippines. It begins by stating that the death penalty violates fundamental human rights and is a cruel punishment. It then lists the crimes that can receive the death penalty in the Philippines, including aggravated murder, terrorism, and drug trafficking. The document also discusses how the death penalty was abolished in the Philippines in 1987 under the constitution but later reinstated in 1993 to address rising crime rates, before being abolished again in 2006. It concludes by stating there is little evidence the death penalty deters crime more than life imprisonment.
The document discusses the history of the death penalty in the Philippines, including:
- The 1987 constitution abolished capital punishment and commuted over 500 death sentences from martial law.
- In 1992, President Ramos wanted to restore the death penalty but Congress did not take action.
- In 1996, lethal injection was mandated for death sentences and the first execution by this method occurred in 1999.
- In 2000, President Arroyo signed legislation again abolishing the death penalty.
A delegation of U.S. human and civil rights organizations participated in the United Nation's review of the U.S.'s compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The delegation highlighted failures of the U.S. to adequately address human rights violations and sought reforms to protect rights like freedom from torture, the death penalty, and solitary confinement. The ICCPR review examined U.S. compliance with the treaty and provided an opportunity for the Obama administration to address human rights concerns and recommendations.
Universal Jurisdiction Under the Rome Statute- GC (2)Ovo Imoedemhe
This document outlines a presentation on universal jurisdiction under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. It discusses traditional principles of jurisdiction, defines universal jurisdiction, and outlines limits on its use. It describes the ICC's jurisdiction and justifications for universal jurisdiction, such as denying safe havens for perpetrators and closing impunity gaps. However, it also discusses arguments against universal jurisdiction, such as threats to sovereignty. The conclusion is that while there seems to be consensus on universal jurisdiction in theory among states, it remains controversial in practical application due to sovereignty concerns. The ICC also does not exercise pure universal jurisdiction due to its complementarity and cooperation regimes.
EXTRAJUDICIAL, ARBITRARY, AND SUMMARY EXECUTIONS IN NIGERIAABA IHRC
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999), as amended, by S.33(1) provides that “[e]very persons has a right to life, and no one shall be deprived intentionally of his life, save in execution of the sentence of a Court in respect of a criminal offence of which he has been found guilty in Nigeria.”
Despite the Constitution's clear mandates, there have been daily, gross violations of this Constitutional safeguard to the right to life by security operatives, particularly the Nigeria police. -Osas Justy Erhabor, Esq., IHRC Vice Chair of Special Projects
The document discusses proposed amendments to articles in a constitution relating to women's rights, freedom of the press, and presidential elections. It proposes amendments to guarantee equal rights for women, prohibit all censorship of media, limit presidents to two terms, and require presidential candidates be nominated by political parties. It references quotes from thinkers like Wollstonecraft, Jefferson, and the US Bill of Rights to support empowering citizens and limiting government overreach.
The document discusses capital punishment and the death penalty. It provides information on how capital punishment is a legal process where a person is put to death by the state as punishment for a crime. It notes that currently 58 nations actively practice capital punishment, while 140 countries have abolished it. It discusses arguments for and against the death penalty, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, closure for victims' families, and the possibility of wrongful convictions. It also summarizes Islam's views on capital punishment and the crimes for which it can be administered under Islamic law.
The document defines torture according to international law as severe pain intentionally inflicted by officials for purposes such as obtaining information or punishment. Torture is prohibited by the Afghan constitution and penal code. The AIHRC's 2013 monitoring found 73 instances of torture in detention centers, with common forms being beating, suspension, and genital torture.
This document provides an overview of genocide as an international crime. It discusses the history and definition of genocide, including the key acts and groups protected. The requirements to constitute genocide are outlined. Questions on aspects like intent, rape, and punishment are addressed. International cases involving genocide that have been heard by the International Court of Justice are summarized. The document concludes by discussing the global acceptance and continued evolution of the genocide regime.
The United Nations Convention against Torture is an international treaty that aims to prevent torture around the world. It defines torture and establishes the Committee Against Torture to monitor states' compliance. States must prevent torture, not extradite people where torture may occur, provide due process, and educate their personnel about prohibiting torture. The Convention defines torture and sets forth state obligations and individual rights regarding torture.
The document discusses constitutional protections and a Supreme Court case related to hijras (transgender people) in Pakistan. It summarizes that Article 9, 25, and 26 of Pakistan's constitution prohibit deprivation of life/liberty and discrimination based on sex. A 2011 Supreme Court case ordered the government to officially recognize hijras as a separate gender and allow people to identify that way on national IDs. This was important as IDs are needed for many activities. The document also discusses organizations advocating for hijra rights like gender equality in Pakistan.
The document discusses the main motivations that drove early explorers to explore new lands: religion/God, glory/fame, and gold/riches. It provides examples of several prominent explorers from history - Henry the Navigator of Portugal, Christopher Columbus of Spain, Ferdinand Magellan, Ponce de Leon, and Vasco de Balboa of Spain - and examines whether their driving forces were God, glory, or gold. The document poses the question of what the reader's motivations might be if they were an explorer in that era.
The document summarizes the motives and means of European exploration and expansion in the 15th and 16th centuries. The three main motives were religion ("God"), profit ("Gold"), and increasing power and national pride ("Glory"). Key means included new technologies, powerful monarchs, and early leaders like Prince Henry and explorers like da Gama, Columbus, and Magellan. Their voyages established European control over trade with Asia and led to conquests in the Americas and the Columbian Exchange of plants, animals, and diseases between Europe and the Americas, transforming global societies and economies.
Europeans explored for several key reasons:
1) Spices were highly valued but could only be obtained from Asia, so European rulers sought a sea route to access spices more cheaply and make their countries wealthy.
2) Gold represented wealth and power, and explorers hoped to find gold in new lands to enrich their home nations.
3) Powerful monarchs like the Kings of Spain and Portugal wanted to expand their empires across new territories for resources and slave labor to increase their dominance.
The document discusses the motivations of early explorers who traveled to the Americas from Europe. There were generally three main motivations: finding gold which could make explorers rich; seeking glory and fame through adventure and discovery; and spreading their religious beliefs, as religion was very important at the time. Explorers took huge risks for the potential of a big reward in one of these three areas.
Europeans explored the world during the Age of Exploration for several key reasons: to find a sea route to Asia to access lucrative spices more easily; to obtain gold, silver, and precious stones to fund expensive wars; to expand their geographical and scientific knowledge of distant lands; to spread Christianity to new regions; and to establish larger colonial empires and claim more territory and resources.
The document discusses the key factors that motivated European exploration between 1450-1700, known as the Age of Exploration. It describes the main motivations as the "Three G's" - Gold, Glory, and God. Europeans were motivated to explore in search of gold and resources from other continents that could be sold for profit. They also sought glory for their kingdoms and countries. Additionally, Europeans felt a duty to spread Christianity and convert native peoples. Technological developments in navigation helped enable long voyages of exploration by sea. The closing of traditional land trade routes to Asia after 1453 further pushed Europeans to find new maritime trade routes by exploring the oceans.
The Rome Statute established the International Criminal Court, which prosecutes crimes of sexual violence and recognizes acts of sexual and gender violence as crimes. It aims to protect witnesses and victims of such crimes and provide support programs. The statute was a result of debates between organizations and governments. It expanded the definition of sexual violence beyond rape and the ICC has taken on cases involving crimes of sexual violence to end impunity for such crimes during conflicts.
This document is a project report submitted by Rohit Bishnoi in partial fulfillment of an LLM degree in criminal law from Manipal University Jaipur. The report discusses international criminal law, including its sources in public international law and treaties. It describes crimes under international criminal law like genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. It also discusses the application of international criminal law in national jurisdictions and by international courts like the International Criminal Court.
Public International Law by Yury Fontão VieiraYury Fontão
Public International Law by Yury Fontão Vieira
This presentation brings with it a brief notion of Public International Law and its principles; some of its constituent elements and also a brief history of the International Criminal Court (ICC), of the international crimes tried by the ICC and other topics related to the topic presented.
Hope you like it!
Feel free to criticize, suggest and praise, I am available.
The document discusses crime and crime prevention. It defines crime and lists common categories of crimes. It then discusses factors that influence crime rates and the impacts of crime on victims. Next, it outlines several approaches to crime prevention, including situational crime prevention, safeguarding methods, and social development prevention. It provides examples of national plans and guidelines for crime prevention. Finally, it discusses the role of government leadership, education, partnerships, and data in developing effective long-term strategies to reduce crime.
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docxtodd271
Running Head: DEATH PENALTY 1
DEATH PENALTY 8
DEATH PENALTY
Jimetria Grice
Colorado Technical University
Rhonda Ntepp
Death penalty is commonly referred to as the capital punishment which refers to the action taken by the government as sanction to discipline and punish law offenders who have been found guilty of committing crime equitable to death. The government conducts the act in line with the provision of the court of law and order. The execution of the death penalty is termed as death penalty or death punishment. The penalties are normally conducted as punishment. The criminals mostly posted on perpetrators of international and country wars and conflicts and treason activities, regional wars and crimes leading to massive deaths and killings, genocide activities and all sort of crimes against the will and desires of the humanity. In most cases the government executes the death punishment through beheading of the criminals. However, most countries have gone against the death penalty terming it unconstitutional and against the will of the human rights. The European Union has gone further to describe the fundamental rights and termed use and implication of death penalties as violation of human rights. Some countries however still apply the death penalties such as Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan countries to punish the law offenders and criminals. The U.S judicial system has also manipulated the death penalty to safeguard the human rights. I personally oppose corporal death punishment and I support the abolishment of the inhuman act since it ruins and interferes with the human rights.
The death penalty is an infringement of human rights and ought to in this way be annulled. Different types of disciplines ought to be applied as opposed to death retribution. Most nations practice capital punishment on murder, war, fear monger acts or injustice cases (Acker, 2017). A few nations then again do the death penalty on inappropriate behavior and wrongdoings, for example, assault cases, homosexuality activities, incest and detailed infidelity hand with strict violations. Some likewise lead the punishment on tranquilize dealers and traffickers. China executes capital punishment on genuine defilement cases just as human dealers and traffickers. In any case, casualties of weakness and disobedience offenses in military missions face capital punishment.
The death penalty is probably the best infringement of Human Rights. This torment of life is against the Human Rights Charter. Nobody has the privilege to end a real existence, in any event, as indicated by the scriptural implication of life. The brutal and savage act is against God's instructions and it ought to be exceptionally censured. Human activists consistently restrict the death penalty. It ought to be canceled as it denies the Human Rights under the International Human reprieve (Garrett, B. L. (2019). An equal move ought to be made however not just passing. Detainm.
International criminal law has evolved over centuries from prohibitions on piracy and slavery to modern conventions protecting individuals during war and from human rights abuses. While the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II are credited with launching international criminal law, it was not until the 1990s that the UN established the ad hoc tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda, creating the first institutions to prosecute individuals for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity. However, international criminal law remains a developing field with shortcomings including limits on prosecuting heads of state, lack of resources, non-cooperation of states, and selective or limited jurisdiction of courts like the International Criminal Court. This chapter will focus on aspects
The document discusses trials held by international courts, including the trials of Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosevic, and cases handled by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. It provides background on the International Court of Justice and describes some of the major cases they have heard. Specifically, it outlines the charges against Saddam Hussein for crimes against humanity, the charges against Milosevic for genocide and crimes against humanity, and precedents set by the ICTR, including the first time rape was classified as genocide.
The Effect of International Prosecutions on the Commission of Norm ViolationsPeter Grenzow
This document discusses theories of deterrence related to international criminal prosecutions and analyzes evidence regarding their effects. It finds:
1) General prosecutorial deterrence may deter some would-be norm violators if the threat of prosecution is viewed as credible, as evidenced by behaviors adjusting to avoid liability.
2) Statistical analyses found international criminal court actions reduced civilian killings by governments and rebels.
3) Specific deterrence via indicting individuals may backfire by causing leaders to entrench their power and escalate crimes to avoid liability, as some leaders' behaviors showed.
The International Criminal Court was created in 1998 through the Rome Statute to prosecute international crimes like war crimes and genocide. Some states have decided to leave or retract support for the ICC, arguing it disproportionately focuses on crimes in Africa. Supporters counter that the ICC acts as intended by prosecuting cases referred by states or where national courts are unwilling or unable. Overall, the ICC aims to end impunity for mass atrocities but faces challenges in balancing global justice with sovereignty concerns.
An Introduction to Criminal LawMultinational Criminal .docxgalerussel59292
An Introduction to Criminal Law
Multinational Criminal Justice
Globalization of crime and terrorism has required enhanced
international coordination of law enforcement efforts. The U.S.
efforts to thwart globalization of crime and terrorism include:Expansion of American law enforcement activities abroadPassage of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPA, 2003)Extradition Forcible removal of criminal suspects from foreign jurisdictions refusing extradition. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/R41004.pdf
An Introduction to Criminal Law
The Globalization of Crime
Transnational crime partly stems from globalization—the internationalization of
trade, services, investment, information and other forms of human social activity.
As defined by the United Nations, transnational crimes are unlawful activities
undertaken by organized criminal groups operating across national boundaries and
include:Terrorism Drug traffickingMoney launderingAlien smugglingHuman and weapons traffickingFraud and corruptiontreaties.un.org/doc/source/RecentTexts/18-12E.doc
An Introduction to Criminal Law
Transnational crime
The United Nations classifies a crimes a Transactional crime if:
It is committed in more than one country.It is committed in one country but a substantial part of its preparation, planning, direction, or control takes place in another country.It is committed in one country but involves an organized criminal group that engages in criminal activities in more than one country.It is committed in one country but has substantial effects in another country.
www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2009/gashc3948.doc.htm - 97k
An Introduction to Criminal Law
Transnational crime (continued)
Comparative criminology is the cross-national study of crime.
Also, it compares crime patterns in one country with those in another and develops theories with increased specificity managing to construct them in such way they can applied across more than one culture or nation-state.
Comparative criminologists study crime on a cross-national level and use those studies to evaluate and improve the U.S. system of criminal justice.
Schmalleger, Frank (2009). Criminology Today: An Integrative Introduction (5th Edition). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall. Page G-2
An Introduction to Criminal Law
Comparative Criminology
One major impediment to Comparative Criminology is the fact the United States is generally an “ethnocentric” culture. Ethnocentrism is the tendency to strongly believe a group's ethnic or cultural group is centrally important and all other groups are measured in relation to that group. Ethnocentric people critically judge other groups relative to his ethnic group, culture and norms. This is especially true in relation to one’s language, behavior, customs, and religion.
Ethnocentric cultures are often not open to considering or even in some case tolerating, research or ideas that are different to the accepted norm within that culture.
Anderson, M.
Ch 6. Understanding Our Criminal Justice System 3 Criminal Law.ppt.pptNamitaPatra3
Criminal law defines criminal conduct and penalties. Substantive law defines crimes, procedural law governs the criminal process. Criminal law has evolved from ancient codes like the Code of Hammurabi. In the US, criminal law comes from constitutions, statutes, regulations, and court decisions at the federal, state, and local levels. A crime is a public wrong prohibited by law and prosecuted by the state. Standards of proof include beyond a reasonable doubt and preponderance of evidence. Mens rea and actus reus must be proven for a crime. Criminal law distinguishes between justifiable, excusable, and criminal homicide. Other crimes include assault, robbery, drug offenses, and property crimes.
Seri Webinar: Memahami dan Mengurai Impunitas di Indonesia
Memahami Impunitas di Indonesia: Suatu Pengantar
Impunitas – secara singkat didefinisikan sebagai 'pembebasan dari hukuman' - mewabah di Indonesia. Artinya, pelanggaran hak asasi manusia pada umumnya dibiarkan begitu saja dan tidak berusaha dibenahi oleh negara dan institusi-institusi hukumnya. Di Indonesia, situasi ini telah ada selama beberapa dekade, dengan konsekuensi bencana bagi supremasi hukum dan masyarakat pada umumnya.
Banyak individu maupun organisasi yang terlibat aktif dalam upaya penguatan rule of law di Indonesia melihat fenomena ini sebagai masalah yang mendesak dan kompleks. Dengan latar belakang ini, Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Indonesia Jentera, Amnesty International Indonesia, Kelompok Kerja Indonesia-Belanda untuk Keadilan dan Pembangunan, dan Institut Van Vollenhoven dari Leiden Law School berinisiatif untuk menyelenggarakan lima seri webinar berjudul: Memahami dan Mengurai Impunitas di Indonesia.
Untuk mendiskusikan hal tersebut, mari bergabung dalam seri webinar pertama bertajuk “Memahami Impunitas di Indonesia: Suatu Pengantar”. Pada agenda ini, para pemateri akan berdiskusi secara interaktif perihal bagaimana akademisi hukum dan aktivis HAM mendefinisikan apa itu impunitas, serta menjelaskan bagaimana konteks sosial, politik, dan sejarah berkelindan di dalamnya.
Pembicara
Adriaan Bedner - Head of Department of the Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law, Leiden University
Usman Hamid - Direktur Eksekutif Amnesty International Indonesia dan Pengajar STH Indonesia Jentera
Moderator
Dian Rositawati - Peneliti Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi untuk Independensi Peradilan dan Pengajar STH Indonesia Jentera
Acara diselenggarakan pada:
Kamis, 27 Januari 2022
Pukul 16.00-18.00 WIB
This document discusses regulating sexual harassment under criminal law in Indonesia. It examines how sexual harassment is currently regulated under Indonesia's Criminal Code and the problems with this approach. It also describes the criminal justice system's enforcement of laws against sexual harassment, which still faces issues like problems of evidence. The document concludes that reforming criminal law is needed to better handle sexual harassment cases and protect victims.
Criminal law defines criminal conduct, specifies punishments, and regulates investigation and prosecution of suspected criminals. A crime requires both a wrongful act and criminal intent. Crimes are considered wrongs against society and are prosecuted by the government as the representative of society. The criminal law originated from primitive tribal customs and has developed through various legal codes, common law, and statutory law.
This document introduces an International Protocol on documenting sexual violence as a crime under international law. It was created through extensive consultation with over 200 experts on documenting and investigating sexual violence in conflict. The Protocol aims to promote accountability by setting out basic principles and standards of best practice for documentation. It is not binding but serves as a tool to support practitioners in effectively and protectively documenting sexual violence crimes. The intended audience is human rights and justice actors documenting these crimes at national and international levels.
This document provides an overview of key topics in criminal law. It outlines an assessment for a criminal law course requiring an 800-1000 word research report. It discusses sources of criminal law in Queensland and Commonwealth legislation. It defines basic concepts like the presumption of innocence, mens rea, actus reus, and strict liability offenses. It categorizes criminal offenses and profiles some example offenses against the person and property. It also lists potential assignment topics and provides guidance on researching these topics.
The document provides an overview of the evolution and key aspects of international criminal law. It discusses how international criminal law began with the Nuremberg trials after WWII, which established crimes like war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. Since then, several ad hoc tribunals have been created to prosecute international crimes in conflicts like Rwanda and Yugoslavia. More recently, the permanent International Criminal Court was established in 2002 to prosecute genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression, while respecting the principle of complementarity giving domestic courts priority.
Ad hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoud Zamani
Exploring the Enduring Impact of ICTY and ICTR on International Criminal Law
In this SlideShare presentation, delve into a comprehensive examination of the enduring legacies left by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in the realm of international criminal law. Gain insights into their pivotal contributions, landmark cases, and their role in shaping the future of global justice
The principle of universal jurisdiction allows the national authorities of any state to investigate and prosecute people for serious international crimes even if they were committed in another country. For example, this means that the German government could, if it chose to do so, prosecute U.S. officials for crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. - http://www.childabductioncourt.eu
This document defines substantive and procedural criminal law and outlines the history and sources of criminal law. It discusses different types of crimes like homicide, assault, sexual assault, and theft. It also covers criminal law concepts such as mens rea, defenses, standards of proof, and differences between criminal and civil law.
Similar to Enhancing the Legal Framework on Male-Directed Sexual Violence Part 2 (20)
This report details the findings of a two-day workshop convened by the United Nations' Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict in July 2013. The conference brought together human rights defenders, medical practitioners and service providers, researchers and academics, civil society representatives, and male survivors of conflict-related sexual violence to discuss gaps in research, legal frameworks, and medical services and support among other things and suggest ways in which to address these gaps.
During a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence against men and boys in conflict Dr. Chris Dolan and Alastair Hilton highlight the challenges of determining the scope of male-directed sexual violence in conflict. Chris Dolan is the director of the Refugee Law Project in Uganda. Alastair Hilton is a founder of First Step Cambodia, an NGO dedicated to providing services to male survivors of sexual violence and their supporters.
During a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence against men and boys in conflict Luis Mora of UNFPA discussed some of the programming gaps in treating male survivors of conflict-related sexual violence.
This document identifies gaps in research on sexual violence against males in conflict settings. It begins by defining research and outlining common research questions. It then discusses what is known about sexual violence against males, including barriers to identification and reporting of victims. However, more data is still needed on prevalence, experiences of different groups affected, and impacts. There is also little documentation of response programs and their effectiveness. Overall research gaps remain in preventing sexual violence against males and effectively protecting, assisting, and seeking justice for victims through the UN's 3P paradigm of prevention, protection, and prosecution.
During a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence against men and boys in conflict Prof. Lara Stemple of UCLA discussed some of the research gaps that exist in the are of male-directed sexual violence.
During a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence against men and boys in conflict Dr. Ernesto Mujica discussed the psychological and biological impacts of this violence.
At a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence in conflict against men and boys Dr. David Ndawula of Uganda spoke of the consequences of this male-irected sexual violence. Dr. Ndawula is a medical doctor with extensive knowledge of the physical, psychological and socio-economic impacts and interventions related to survivors of sexual violence.
More from United Nations Office of the Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict (7)
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Kat...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
Integrating Ayurveda into Parkinson’s Management: A Holistic ApproachAyurveda ForAll
Explore the benefits of combining Ayurveda with conventional Parkinson's treatments. Learn how a holistic approach can manage symptoms, enhance well-being, and balance body energies. Discover the steps to safely integrate Ayurvedic practices into your Parkinson’s care plan, including expert guidance on diet, herbal remedies, and lifestyle modifications.
Basavarajeeyam is a Sreshta Sangraha grantha (Compiled book ), written by Neelkanta kotturu Basavaraja Virachita. It contains 25 Prakaranas, First 24 Chapters related to Rogas& 25th to Rasadravyas.
Adhd Medication Shortage Uk - trinexpharmacy.comreignlana06
The UK is currently facing a Adhd Medication Shortage Uk, which has left many patients and their families grappling with uncertainty and frustration. ADHD, or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, is a chronic condition that requires consistent medication to manage effectively. This shortage has highlighted the critical role these medications play in the daily lives of those affected by ADHD. Contact : +1 (747) 209 – 3649 E-mail : sales@trinexpharmacy.com
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kol...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Versio
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
Muktapishti is a traditional Ayurvedic preparation made from Shoditha Mukta (Purified Pearl), is believed to help regulate thyroid function and reduce symptoms of hyperthyroidism due to its cooling and balancing properties. Clinical evidence on its efficacy remains limited, necessitating further research to validate its therapeutic benefits.
Enhancing the Legal Framework on Male-Directed Sexual Violence Part 2
1. International Human Rights Law Clinic
Enhancing the Legal Framework for Conflict-
Related SexualViolence Against Men
Professor Laurel E. Fletcher
Director, International Human Rights Law Clinic
July 25, 2013
2. How Robust Are The Legal Frameworks for
Accountability for Sexual Violence Against Men?
How does the current international
criminal law framework apply
to conflict-related
sexual violence against men?
What does the Ugandan example
suggest about gaps in domestic
legal frameworks with respect to
accountability for these crimes?
What action should be taken to strengthen the international legal response
to sexual violence against men?
A Congolese rape victim, currently residing in Uganda
3. Refugee Law Project Working Paper No. 24
Review of relevant
•International criminal law
•Human rights law & mechanisms
Analysis of Ugandan
•Incorporation of Rome Statute
•Intersection with amnesty law
•Relevant penal code provisions
Legal options for redress
Application of int’l law &
standards to domestic
law reform agenda
4. International Criminal Law and the
Prosecution of Sexual Violence
Contribution of Ad Hoc Tribunals
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) became the
main tribunals responsible for the contemporary evolution of jurisprudence
on rape and sexual violence.
These tribunals clarified international norms prohibiting rape and sexual
violence.
They established rape and sexual violence as constituent elements of
genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, and used gender-neutral
language to describe the victims of sexual violence.
5. Rome Statute: Broad and Gender-Inclusive
The Rome Statute expanded the expressly enumerated sexual violence crimes in
international criminal law, adding the following to the list of war crimes and crimes
against humanity:
• sexual slavery
• enforced prostitution
• forced pregnancy
• enforced sterilization
• other forms of SV of equivalent gravity (Rome Statute art. 7(1)(g))
Rome Statute acknowledged that sexual violence can be committed against men and
women: “the word invasion is intended to be broad enough to be gender-neutral.”
Rape and sexual violence are defined by the ICC to include coercion as an element,
which can be established by some degree of force, threat, or oppression.
6. Prosecutions for Sexual Violence Against
Men in the Former Yugoslavia
In Prosecutor v. Milosevic, the ICTY prosecutor
charged acts of forced fellatio, forced incest, and
gang rape of men as persecution as a crime
against humanity.
In Prosecutor v. Tadic, the ICTY prosecutor
charged the defendant with persecution and
inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, as
well as torture or inhuman treatment as a war
crime, but NOT with rape as a crime against
humanity.
In Prosecutor v. Cesic, the accused forced two Muslim brothers to perform fellatio on
each other. For that incident, Cesic was convicted of rape as a crime against humanity,
as well as humiliating and degrading treatment as a war crime.
Omarska Camp, Bosnia and Herzegovina
7. Prosecutions for Sexual Violence Against
Men at the International Criminal Court
In Prosecutor v. Kenyatta, the OTP found that
there were reasonable grounds to believe that
the defendants were responsible for murder,
39 reported cases of rape, and at least 6 cases
of forcible circumcision among others.
Chief Prosecutor Ocampo moved to charge
the incidents of forced circumcision and sexual
mutilation as “other forms of sexual violence”
under Article 7(1)(g) of the Rome Statute.
The ICC judges disagreed: “not every act of violence which targets part of
the body commonly associated with sexuality should be considered an act
of sexual violence.” They categorized the acts as “other inhumane acts” under
Article 7(1)(k).
Kenya’s new President Uhuru Kenyatta (L) and
Cabinet Secretary Francis Muthaura (R) at the ICC
8. Barriers to Accountability for Sexual
Violence Against Men in Domestic Law
Domestic Incorporation of Rome Statute May Not Be Sufficient
Legal Framework.
Gaps in Domestic Law Include:
• Gender-exclusive Definitions of Sexual Violence Crimes
• Consent Test
• Criminalization of Sodomy
9. Ugandan Example
Definition of Rape (UPC § 123)
Any person who has unlawful carnal knowledge of a
woman or girl, without her consent, or with her
consent, if the consent is obtained by force or by means
of threats or intimidation... or by fear of bodily harm...
commits the felony termed rape.
10. Comparing Ugandan Law with International
Criminal Law
Ugandan Law International Law
Rape is the “unlawful carnal
knowledge of a woman or a
girl…”
Gender-exclusive provisions
Rape is the invasion of “the body of a
person by conduct resulting in penetration
of … any part of the body of the
victim…”
Gender-inclusive provisions
Prosecutor has to prove that
the act occurred “without her
consent”
Consent Test
Prosecutor has to prove that “the
invasion was committed by force, or by
the threat of force or coercion… caused
by duress, detention … or abuse of
power”
Coercion Test
11. Criminalization of Sodomy and Chilling
Effect on Reporting Sexual Violence
UPC §145: Unnatural Offences.
Any person who—
(a) has carnal knowledge of any person against the order of
nature;
(b) has carnal knowledge of an animal; or
(c) permits a male person to have carnal knowledge of him
or her against the order of nature, commits an offence
and is liable to imprisonment for life.
12. Addressing Gaps in Legal Frameworks
What Processes for Domestic Legal Reform Should Be Promoted?
• Role for UN, states, civil society, academics?
How Can We Improve Implementation of Legal Frameworks?
• Training? For whom?
• Integration of int’l (ICC) and domestic investigations
• Need for domestic witness protection and support
How Should Criminalization of Sodomy and Homophobia Be
(Re)Framed: An Access to Justice Issue?
• (Re)Engagement from perspective of conflict-related abuse
Redress for Victims
• Holistic approach needed to provide justice for all victims.