Empire Essay

Reasons For The Collapse Of The Roman Empire
The Roman Empire was at one point the envy of the ancient world. At it's peak in 117 C.E, the
empire spanned from western Europe to northern Africa, through the Mediterranean Sea and into
western Asia. From about 27 B.C.E. to 476 C.E.. Rome was notorious for holding the name of the
world's greatest empire, as Ancient Rome oftentimes furnished civilians with essential necessities
such as jobs, food, and spices. Moreover, forms of entertainment including, holding a plenitude of
concerts and plays were provided to Roman citizens. However, this era of opulence quickly ceased
and conflicts began to emerge through the empire. In turn, by 500 C.E. , the western half of the
empire had begun to collapse, as did the eastern part of the empire after another thousand years. The
three fundamental elements that justify the collapse of the Roman Empire include the economic and
social problems, political instability, as well as the weakening frontiers the civilization had within.
One main factor on as to why the Roman empire fell was because of the flood of economic and
social problems the civilization faced. "The overwhelming majority of people had been excluded
from playing an active role in their own government...could not serve in the army" (Doc 1). With a
large portion of the inhabitants of the Roman Empire not having the ability to be a part of the
government and/or not join the army, contention began to spark amongst the public. One can
observe from this that due to not permitting
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Roman Empire Essay
Question C:
The Roman empire was large and very vast. It encompassed many different cultures that fell under
Roman political rule. Romanization or becoming a Roman is described by studying the changes in
everyday life to include language and religious practices, and from drinking habits and personal
names. The western provinces of the Roman empire had a long and trouble some experience
throughout its history. Much of the Britain and Germanic Gaul's history was destroyed by the
Romanization process, so much so, that modern studies describe the history of those areas from a
Roman perspective. While Tacticus was governor of Britain, Agricola, he practiced the civilizing
mission or known as the Tacitean coda, which increased the number of temples, forums and villas
being built in Britain. Tacticus also made sure that Latin was spoken more widely and that sons of
native elites were educated in Roman ways. By the reign of Tiberius, the Roman town of
Augustodunum in central Gaul was equipped with a school, where the elite youth of the Gallic
provinces could receive a decent liberal, Greek and Latin education.
Furthermore, Rome made Roman things fashionable. People aspired to be and look Roman, since
Roman–ness was associated with power. The Roman states was always willing to assimilate people
who looked, spoke, and behaved like good Romans. So there were strong incentives favoring the
'self–Romanization' of the western provincial elites. Additionally, the assimilation of pottery

Many consider the British Empire as the most powerful and successful empire to have ever existed.
Despite not having many resources or a large population, the small island soon had control
throughout the world, accentuating the saying, "The sun never sets on the British Empire". The
British Empire's presence lasted for nearly four hundred years, through various external and internal
conflicts that threatened the country's resources, people, colonies, and more. The British Empire rose
due to a number of different activities done by the British, consisting primarily from its economic
strategies, its colonization methods, its military prowess and cultural conversion of natives.
For an empire to exist, it must have wealth. Without money, empires typically do not last long,
falling due to the lack of funding for their expansion. The Empire's improvement of various monetary
techniques enabled them to extend through their financial might. Their advancement of joint stock
companies helped to grow their power monetarily. Originally, these companies were controlled by
investor funds, and did not have much, if any government control. Since they were not involved with
the government, the company's main goal was to profit from their actions, which spread the
influence of the British people. The government, however, did acknowledge the benefits of these
companies, and provided benefits to them that allowed for their expansion. One way that the
government was able to help the company was

What Makes An Empire So Successful?
The empire is wealthy. Success is constant; the trained and equipped army group is destroying
enemies. Having three leaders on each satrap is both effective and innovative. Having postal
service and roads makes communication simple. Although there is much to commend, my job is
more effective when I correct mistakes, although there are few errors, some are evident. The
greater society would benefit in changes such as, having the group of 100,000 almost defenseless
warriors cared for; raising the tribute prices and compromise wit the conquered about keeping
laws, religion, and language after being conquered; and spreading out ethnic groups. Having the
majority of your military being drafted, unprepared and unequipped is ineffective and offensive to
the civilians. A necessary part of creating a united empire is influencing the people to feel valued.
Having 100,000 people with clubs as weapon fighting against spears and swords is forcing them to
feel...show more content...
Currently, the empire is divided into 20 different ethnic groups. It can be a great thing to be
diverse when done correctly, but this is not the best way to deal with the situation. By
incentivizing people to spread you not only limit the chance of destruction but also force people
to benefit from others. Different skillsets can combine to make an ideal group. This will bring the
dying Persian culture back to life. Everyone will know people with the Persian culture and after
experiencing it; the culture might rub off on them. Persians are a minority and this change will
help make the culture known and still keep diversity. Another benefit would be people less likely
to rebel because of paying tribute because they will be with less people of the same laws, religion
and language. With a strong known culture, small chances of rebellion and people benefiting from
each other this empire will success like no other civilization has ever

British Empire Essay
THE BRITISH EMPIRE
The British Empire was the largest empire in history and for a time was the foremost global power.
It was a product of the European age of discovery, which began with the maritime explorations of the
15th century, that sparked the era of the European colonial empires.
By 1921, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, approximately
one–quarter of the world's population. It covered about 36.6 million kmВІ (14.2 million square
miles), about a quarter of Earth's total land area. As a result, its legacy is widespread, in legal and
governmental systems, economic practice, militarily, educational systems, sports, and in the global
spread of the English language. At the peak of its power, it...show more content...
In 1600, the English East India Company was established to facilitate the trade, but because of the
then continuing war with Spain, the British overseas interests were limited to mainly raiding
Spanish fleets.
SIR WALTER RALEIGH'S FAILED ATTEMPT TO COLONIZE AMERICA
The very first attempt at creating a British colony in the Americas was launched by the English
adventurer, Sir Walter Raleigh, in 1585. This settlement did not survive, and the English did not
attempt further exploration and colonization in the Americas until 1604, after peace had been made
with Spain. Raleigh himself gained fame in the war with Spain, but fell out of favor with the
English monarch and was later imprisoned in the Tower of London, finally being executed in 1618.
NORTH AMERICA COLONIZED IN 17TH CENTURY
During the 17th Century, Britain established its first permanent colonies in North America, first in
Virginia, and then in the Caribbean, with tobacco plantations in the West Indies and religious
colonies along the Atlantic coast of North America.
FIRST SLAVES IN AMERICA WERE WHITE
The first British foothold in the West Indies was Saint Christopher (later Saint Kitts), acquired in
1623. A little known fact about the first English plantations established in the West Indies was that
the laborers who were first used to work

The Rule Of The Empire Essay
Throughout history, state power and religious influence have gone hand in hand. Rulers and their
governmental bodies have used their power and influence in an attempt to spread their religious
mantra to their populace. Asoka, of the Mauryan empire, wanted to use his religion in order to
establish his empire as a stronghold of peace and prosperity. In stark contrast to that, Emperor Trajan
of Rome wanted for Christians under his dominion to be persecuted in order to keep the status quo
of the empire. Walking the line between acceptance and persecution, Emperor Constantine of Rome
attempted to use persuasion in order to coax people to convert to Christianity. No matter the efforts
used, the conversion methods that those rulers used, the conversion methods that those rulers
undertook had a great effect on the populace that they controlled. The effects that this religious
indoctrination had, however, is determined entirely by the qualities of the ruler, the culture that
region adopted, and the characteristics of the religion that the ruler attempted to propagate Asoka
is commonly known today as a fair ruler who was just in his dealings and accepting of multiple
cultures and faiths; however, he was not always a benevolent and fair ruler. His conversion to
Buddhism was a direct result of the Battle of Kalinga. The Battle of Kalinga was the last campaign
of the Mauryan Dynasty. It took place in the Kingdom of Kalinga, and was a devastating
engagement, with over one hundred

Essay American Empire
Michael Cox's thesis as outlined in "Empire by Denial? Debating US Power", is chiefly that: the
United States of America is an empire, and that current beliefs to the contrary are the result of
denialism due to negative connotations associated with the concept of empire, not due to a lack of
suitability of that term to describe the current state of American foreign policy. The first issue
which Cox raises is that of a lack of understanding of and study into the concept of empire by
current research in the field of international relations (Cox 2004, p230). This element would appear
to be sound, but only in so far as it relates to Cox's other assertion that the orthodoxy of American
society and academia are opposed to labelling America an...show more content...
His argument becomes unconvincing when it becomes clear that Cox is playing the role of both
legislature and judiciary, crafting the terms to meet his needs and then applying them. Whilst the
underlying evidence he presents is sound, the multitude of conflicting arguments make clear the
selectivity in evidence employed in order to reach these conclusions (Security Dialogue 2004). As
with any argument though concerning matters of perspective, both our own status as outsiders, and
that of Cox, being himself British born (FORA.tv 2007), lead credence to Cox's assertion of an
American empire, himself asserting the supposed obviousness of his thesis to anyone outside of the
USA. Recognising and accounting for this though, the evidence offered about the many
'non–standard' forms of empire are still sound. Fisher (1984) highlights the success of British
incorporation of local political structures into its empire, and Cox's contention that American
promotion of seemingly anti–imperial ideas of democracy and self determination are not in
contradiction to its presiding over an empire are sound on examination of the underlying elements.
The cohesive strength of an American empire lies not in the hard power capabilities of the USA to
enforce their will, but in the loose and forgiving way in which it rules

The Rise Of The German Empire
In 1815, Europe, little did it know, gained a new Empire established by the Congress of Vienna.
When Germany came into power there were many obstacles, namely the division of the state by
languages . It waged multiple smaller wars over years and a power struggle occurred from the time
of its emergence throughout its history. Many great leaders helped reform and unite the regions of
Germany, such as Otto von Bismarck, strengthened and built the German Empire. The climax of the
German Empire was World War I as its new found power was displayed on the world stage. The
decline of the German Empire however had just as many contributing factors, including an unstable
political atmosphere, destruction during World War I, and inflation within the
...show more content...
Although the crown was turned down, the impact of the revolutions was a development of
Nationalism which would only increase in years to come. Throughout the beginning of the rise of
Germany, the conflict between Austrian and Prussian control over the German State persisted. There
were no clear lines as to where the German State ended and Austria began. The most significant
factor in dividing states was language where German and Danish speaking lands were split.
Until 1866 and the 7 Weeks War, Austria had maintained most of the leadership over the German
State as declared by the Congress of Vienna in 1815. The Prussians had a swift victory over Austria
in this quick war and a treaty, signed on 23 August 1866, gavePrussia power through the leadership
of Otto Von Bismarck. As part of the treaty, Austria remained completely intact, although humiliated.
Three of the Catholic states are recognized as independent, but maintain deep economic ties to
Germany under Bismarck. Once power has been established over the German State by Prussia, the
Franco–Prussian War had a front to begin on. The three catholic states sided with the Prussian King
in support of the German Cause and solidify the Empire's territory. France was defeated almost as
quickly as Austria had been only a few years earlier. Although an armistice was reached in Versailles,
it

Why Do Empires Fall?
Introduction Empires rise, but they can fall. Empires need to have the correct mindset in order to
rise properly. If they don't then they could accidentally let in invaders. If empires have the
strongest technology, they could make other empires fall and make themselves become more
successful as an empire. But if the empire is too full of themselves, they could cause a civil war.
The empire also needs a strong ruler. If an empire does not have a ruler, then there would be no
empire. Desire One way that an empire can rise is if they have the desire to even become an
empire in the first place. This is very important because the empire has to know what they are
capable and incapable of doing. If parts of an union do not want to become an empire, then they
could possibly break off into a...show more content...
Everyone one Earth eventually dies. Leaders are important, so when a leader dies, everyone
might go out of control! Without a ruler, the empire could not know what to do and fight against
who the new ruler will be, which will cause a civil war. Losing a ruler can cause an empire to slowly
fall. Civil War One of the most common ways that an empire falls is a civil war. When an empire
has a civil war, that shows their weaknesses to enemies. When enemies know each other's
weaknesses, this could cause a world war, and for the empire to fall. Small infighting can lead up to
a civil war. A civil war is a common cause for an empire to fall. Conclusion As you can see, can rise
in many different ways. The cause for an empire's rise can be because of technology, a great
leader,or the desire to become an empire. But empires can also fall. The cause for an empire to fall
could be invaders, the loss of a leader, or a civil war. Empires rise and fall, but a good question is, if
you know that you will eventually fall, then why

Empire Builders Essay
What are some of the disadvantages, problems or difficulties experienced by Empire builders?вЂЁ
Empires with their self prophesied title, innately express the notion of expansion! Builders of
empires through the ages have consistently shown the somewhat insatiable need to expand! It is this
notion of expansion or more specifically the "necessity" for it (Leroy–Beaulieu, 1891), that seems a
continual challenge for "empire builders" to control and therefore sustain. As an empire expands the
ability to sustain, regulate and control its realm, provides continual challenges for local economies.
With an obsession for treasures and profits over social health and sustainability (McClintock, 1995),
"How, despite their "good intentions" did the British...show more content...
With pots of gold (lucrative international markets) at the end of a distant rainbow, the cities elite
"fiercely resisted out side regulation" (Darwin, 2009) leaving them to reign for the most part,
unchallenged and unchecked. With the economic sky remaining clear, the empire elites where able
to gain great wealth and power through monopolisation of commodities and industry.
Unfortunately because of the autonomy allowed to the elites (also enhanced by ideals of race
supremacy and hierarchal traditions), they became entrenched in ideology and bureaucracy
escaping the critique that was necessary for accountability and appropriate regulation. The
economic hub became a "great arena where private savings were mobilised for investment
overseas (Darwin, 2009) feeding the perpetual wheel of individual greed, exchanging the souls (if
you like) of local economies and 'scooping out' the real assets of an enterprise while selling on
'shrivelled carcasses' to a bamboozled public (Darwin,

Empires And Its Impact On The Society
At a point and time in history there were empires and people that had authority or more power
over another. To distinguish whether the empires were advantageous or disadvantageous we have
to look at circumstances from their perspective and also it depends on the colony. Cities like Rome
had its flaws just as any other nation. The city have encountered aspects that are still known today
like their culture art, architecture or signature designs, and even their entertainment at theaters that
are remembered. However they deteriorated from multiple wars, poverty, and unfair treatment.
Empires may have not been so effective to the people that lived amongst them. To better
understand the effects that the empire have on the communities and people of this time period
you must first understand what an empire is. An empire is a political construct in which one state
dominates over another state or a series of states. From prior knowledge one can infer that an
empire is usually ruled by an emperor. To the people that lived in those empires in that past they
were disadvantageous and not beneficial to them in many ways. Majority of the empires have
declined and you have to think analytically on why. When people think of an empire, dominance
usually comes to mind and these people were submissive to the more powerful person in this unity.
Due to the emperors having power they had the authority and legitimacy to get the people to do
anything. Rome for example was considered to be a city of

The Persian Empire Essay
THE PERSIAN EMPIRE Similar to the Roman Empire the Persian Empire stretched across vast
lands without any serious rivalry. At the height of the empire it stretched across, not only, Asia,
from the Aegean to the Indus River, but also included part of the continent of Africa. We get the
word, Persia, from the Greek word Parsa meaning, "Above reproach". The Persians unlike most
other Empires would be ruled under a benevolent ruler. This would bring a large amount of cultural
diffusion to the Empire. The empires history is separated into three historical periods: Old Persia
(600–300 B.C.E), Middle Persia (300–800 B.C.E.) and modern Persia (800–Present). The height or
the Empire was reached around 500 B.C.E. (Ancient and Medieval History...show more content...
This is probably due to the following portion of the cylinder: "The population of Babylon calls
blessings on my kingship, and I have enabled all the lands to live in peace. Every day I copiously
supplied ... geese, two ducks and ten pigeons more than the geese, ducks and pigeons .... I sought out
to strengthen the guard on the wall Imgur–Enlil, the great wall of Babylon, and ... the quay of baked
brick on the bank of the moat which an earlier king had built but not completed, I ... its work. ...
Which did not surround the city outside, which no earlier king had built, his troops, and the
levee from his land, in/to Shuanna? ... With bitumen and baked brick I built anew, and completed
its work. ... Great doors of cedar wood with copper cladding. I installed all their doors, threshold
slabs and door fittings with copper parts." *(British Museum) Long before the great king, Cyrus'
death the Persian Empire had reached the milestone that allowed it to be the first empire that was
so large. Cyrus had a son, who took over the throne in 530 B.C.E., named Cambyses II. Cambyses
would show the same ambition we saw in his father. In 525 B.C.E he added Egypt to the Persian
Empire. His victory was not to be enjoyed for long. He died in 522 B.C.E. and it is assumed that
he may have died from a sword wound. This wound is believed to be accidental. Although, his death
was not mourned for like that of his father. This may have been due to his

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Essay
The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire The Roman Empire was a beautiful place ruled by
Augustus. The borders of the empire during the Pax Romana measured 10,000 miles and enclosed
an area of more than 3 million square miles, that's about the size of the United States today. The
population of the empire during this period was between 70 and 90 million people. The city of
Rome itself was home to about one million people. During the third century (A.D. 200–300),
problems confronted the Roman Empire. The decline of the empire continued for almost 300
hundred years. The Roman Empire was brought to its downfall because of the way their Social,
Political, and Economic systems were working. Historians say that the Roman Empire began to
Advanced militarism attracted men looking for victory. The character of the soldiers changed
from armed men fighting to defend their homes and families to men signing up to fight as
mercenaries. As demand increased for foreign goods, currency flowed out of Rome to foreign
countries. Rome and its people no longer believed in their empire, and didn't care much about
family values anymore. The Economic issues were that they had poor harvest. Food was scarce
and people needed food so they went after it. There was a disruption of trade by barbarians and
pirates on Mediterranean Sea lanes. Since the war was over, there was no more war booty. Gold
and silver were drained away to buy things from foreign countries, this led to inflation, a drop in
the worth of money and a rise in prices. The Roman road and bridge system fell out of order,
causing a hurt in trade. The crushing tax fell all upon the plebian class, who had no money to start
with. Everything was quickly spiraling downhill. The Empire's economy was worsened by its
military problems. Tribes of northern barbarians called Goths overran the legions guarding the
Danube frontier numerous times. Instead of fighting for patriotism, Roman soldiers now fought for
money. The government promised higher cash awards to attract recruits into the army. Emperors
started to recruit barbarians because they would

Early Empires Essay
The early empires, numerous and powerful, provided structure for a long amount of time. While
some may be far apart, they share some similar features. Highlighted in Chapter 3, the Roman,
Persian, Mauryan, and Han Empires show a glimpse of early societies. All empires had one main
focus: expanding their territory. In addition to the expansion of territories, they shared the desire to
establish different types of governments. Most of the empires shared the same polytheistic origins,
contributing all of their success to the gods. However, these territories differed. While many had
classes in society, each treated their people differently. A few dynasties offered full rights, while
some only granted freedom to select citizens. Eventually, all

Early Civilizations And Empires Essay
What Distinct Characteristics Did the Early Civilizations and Empires of the Middle East and Egypt
Develop? Early civilizations and empires of the Middle East and Egypt developed several distinct
characteristics. Babylon, Ancient Israelites, and Egypt developed characteristics that included
governmental, social, and economic structures as well as distinct religions and innovations. These
civilizations and empires existed between 2,575 B.C. – 323 B.C. and most of them had notable
rulers. One of the civilizations in the ancient Middle East was Babylon. Babylon had two kingdoms;
The Old Kingdom which ranged from 1,790 B.C. – 1,595 B.C., and the New Kingdom that ranged
from 625 B.C. – 539 B.C. Hammurabi and Nebuchadnezzar were Babylon kings. Hammurabi was
the first king to codified laws, which he named Hammurabi's Code. His code was split up into two
section, the first was a civil law that dealt with private rights and matters, such as business contracts,
property inheritance, and more. The second section dealt with matters such as robberies, assaults,
and murder. Babylon...show more content...
under the ruling of Cyrus the Great. Under emperor Darius, Persia had a bureaucracy, which
meant that they had a system of government through departments and subdivisions administered
by officials who follow a set of rules. He also divided the empire into provinces, each called a
satrapy and headed by a governor called a satrap. Darius also drew up a single code of laws for
the empire, similar to what Hammurabi did. He did this in hopes of improving trade, Darius also
set up a common set of weights and measures, and he encourage the usage of coins. But most
people continued to be part of the barter economy. However the coins system brought merchants
and traders into an early form of a money economy. A Persian thinker named Zoroaster rejected the
old Persian gods and taught that a single wise god, named Ahura Mazda. This was the first presence
of

The City–state of Rome became a republic in 509 BC. Rome fought numerous battles to become
what it was at its height. It all started with the Punic wars. After they won, there was no stopping
them. By the first century BC, Rome controlled most of the known world. (Mahoney, 2001) With
Augustus Caesar began the two centuries of the Pax Romana. During this time all of Rome became
a collection of states rather than conquered provinces. The only threats that ever came were from the
unorganized barbarian tribes who's conquest brought nothing to the Empire. (Mahoney, 2001) The
rise of the Roman Empire had many contributors. These factors would include strength in the
military, society, leadership, religious, and architectural aspects of the...show more content...
Emperor Hadrian concentrated more on how the Empire was run verses making it larger. He also
helped start the Pax Romana (Roman Peace). (Mahoney, 2001) The fourth factor was the amazing
engineers, inventors, and architects in the Empire. By 200 AD the Romans had built 53,000
miles of roads throughout the Empire. The very first was built in 312 BC. They also invented
sewers, central heating systems, and the first types of concrete. (Mahoney, 2001) The last of all
the factors was religion. The Romans worshiped around 30,000 gods in all. These included the
major gods and goddesses such as Jupiter, the chief god, Neptune, god of the sea, Venus, goddess
of love and beauty, and Minerva, goddess of wisdom and war. Each household also worshipped
their own protective spirits. After Caesar's death, the emperors were considered gods too. People
all over the empire were allowed to worship their own local gods as long as they paid homage to
the Roman gods. The people built large temples for worship of their different gods. They looked
to the gods to help protect their families and lives. This also helped when going into battle. How
could you not win with so many gods on your side? (Mahoney, 2001) As you have read, many
things attributed to the rise of the Empire. Many things also attributed to its fall as well. These
included poor leadership, economic trouble, as well as growth aspects. (Mahoney, 2001) The Empire
began with great leaders, but they

Rise And Fall Of The Persian Empire
can be seen through the documented evidence left behind from the ancient civilisation that the
Persian Empire [550BCE – 331BCE] was crafted with a combination of various attributes such as,
strong standing armies that were prepared to fight through the worst of situations for their leaders,
the assisstance of skillful leadership and the respectfulness of a kind and caring King, a tolerance
and resilience towards various situations and problems that could arise, and an effective
government. As it would appear, these qualities had a major impact on the lives of those that lived
within the Persian Empire as without them, the empire started to crumble and dissolve. There were
a magitude of factors that lead to the slow fall and decline of the...show more content...
These revolts caused the rulers of the time to abandon their religious beliefs, and work for 'evil
spirits'. As it would appear, the Kings of the empire became lustful and filled with greed to the
point that stealing from their countries supplies was legalised to further their own riches, rather
than giving it back to the people of the land. The civilians no longer recieved the resources needed
to build and scuplt various beautiful artworks, and ancient buildings, and thus, the level of
production throughout the land decreased. As the production rate decreased, the Persian taxes
became heavier and more oppressive, which lead to an economic depression and various revolts
against the governing bodies and higher classes, which, of course, lead to more repressive taxes. As
the revolts continued on the Persian Kings started hoarding gold and silver rather than re–circulating
it, and as a result of their actions, the economic situation declined further as there was not enough
gold or silver to keep businesses going, and prompting

The Pros And Cons Of The British Empire
Did you know that the British Empire, the most extensive empire in world history, ruled
approximately 1/4 of the world's population and covered about 1/4 of Earth's total land area which
explained how and why Britain was gaining so much power? It's recognizable that Britain only
gains global power because the advantages of regional issues in Europe such as trading,
compromising and finances. During the 18 century, Britain and France fought many battles causing
issues to Europes people leaving them with nothing and nothing to look to, But today you cannot tell
they were enemies. The other countries in Europe had a disadvantage to these three things so they
lacked the skills of gaining power so if they are lacking the skill it shows them that they didn't have
enough power to challenge Britain. Britain had extraordinary tactics for example when they started
Finances was another reason why Britain had global power when Britain had the chance to get or
earn money they did. For example, when Britain made the Bengali government pay for paying
military expenses and war transportation, This gave them much more of a reputation. When
Britain agreed to MirJafar paying the troops if he needed them again for war showed that Britain
got what they wanted and forced them to get what they needed, The British also had help when
Spain taxed the Spanish colonist to sell goods. The reason the British needed the products to be
taxed was so they could gain higher profits and power, by them making a higher profit allowed
them to get things they needed for war. The reason Britain has so much money is that they made
allies with people and made compromises, Britain did a trade for trade that guaranteed they
wouldn't have to pay for the war. This caused Britain to gain the most power and control europe by
doing things that involved selling and fighting to show that they are the big team and will always

Causes of the Fall of the Roman Empire Essay
For a long period of time, Rome seemed like an unstoppable empire. It conquered the majority of
the land surrounding it, including Greece, Turkey, Iraq, and many of its other neighboring
countries. It seemed as though Rome would conquer the entire world, as it was the center of it,
until it began to decline in 476 C.E. The very aspects that made it so successful were the ones that
caused its collapse. Various political, religious, and economic reasons caused its downfall. The fact
that the entire economy of Rome collapsed and money became worthless was a major reason for
the empire's collapse. In addition, the loss of a common religion and lack of efficient ruling in
relation to its vast territory affected the empire. The Roman...show more content...
They were the main economic boost of the empire, and were now lost. Unlike with political and
religious reasons involved in the fall of the empire, regardless of what laws were changes and
removed or what actions were taken, nothing could reverse the effect of this terrible economy on
the Roman Empire. (http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=22703, Sterns page 108) At one
time, all of Rome was united by a common religion. This religion, commonly referred to as the
Roman religion, was derived from the religion in Greece. Members of this religion, which included
the majority, if not all, of the Roman citizens, worshiped many different gods, including the creator
or father god, Jupiter, the sun god, Apollo, the god of inspiring wars, Mars, and many others as
well. The popularity of this religion began to decline when Christianity arose. It appealed to the
majority of the people, particularly the lower class and slaves, who now had something to put their
hope and faith in. This religion spread rapidly, and Roman emperors felt that because it was so
influential it would become a possible threat. These leaders began persecuting Christians, but many
Romans had already committed to this religion and refused to abandon it because they viewed it as
the most important part of their life. This led to a lack of patriotism in Roman citizens who then
rejected politics and became independent of the government. (http://www.123helpme.com
/view.asp?id=22703,

Similarities And Other Empires Similarities
Empires over the centuries have certain aspects that are similar and different than other empires.
Empires tend to deal with the same situations, but they also handle it in various ways. There are
certain things empires can't avoid dealing with like currency, war, disease, religion, traitors, etc.
Siberia in Russia, Spanish America, and Haiti in France are no different from those circumstances.
The main differences and similarities between the three countries will be religion and money. Russia
was the world's largest territorial empire that categorized under an Asia making it an European
power (p. 553). One of the main things certain empires had in common was currency. The standard
silver coin was used in North America, Europe, India, Russia,

Empire Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service College

More from Paper Writing Service College (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Empire Essay