THE RIGHT FONT FOR THE JOB
EFFECT OF TYPEFACE-PRODUCT CONGRUENCY
ON ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE AD
Tim Smits
KU Leuven
@timsmitstim
Tim.smits@soc.kuleuven.be
PRESENTED @ EMAC2015
Collaboration:
Robin Van der Sar
Goele Aerts (KU Leuven)
BACKGROUND
“The great art in writing advertisements, is the finding
out a proper method to catch the reader's eye, without
which a good thing may pass over unobserved, or be
lost among commissions of bankrupt. […] I must not
here omit the blind Italian character, which being scarce
legible, always fixes and detains the eye, and gives the
curious reader something like the satisfaction of prying
into a secret.”
Typeface @ emac2015 2
BACKGROUND
“The great art in writing advertisements, is the finding
out a proper method to catch the reader's eye, without
which a good thing may pass over unobserved, or be
lost among commissions of bankrupt. […] I must not
here omit the blind Italian character, which being scarce
legible, always fixes and detains the eye, and gives the
curious reader something like the satisfaction of prying
into a secret.”
Addison, 1710
Typeface @ emac2015 3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic_Sans
“The Boston Phoenix reported on disgruntlement over the
widespread use of the font, especially its incongruous use for
writing on serious subjects, with the complaints urged on by a
campaign started by two Indianapolis graphic designers, Dave
and Holly Combs, via their website "Ban Comic Sans". The
movement was conceived in 1999 by the two designers, after
an employer insisted that one of them use Comic Sans in a
children's museum exhibit”
“In the Netherlands popular radio DJs Coen
Swijnenberg and Sander Lantinga decided to celebrate the
font by having a Comic Sans day on the first Friday of July.
Comic Sans Day has been held since 2009. Some Dutch
companies have their website in Comic Sans on this day.”
Typeface @ emac2015 4
CONGRUENCY IN ADS
Match between a creative choice and strategic (brand)
positioning : colors, endorsers, humor, pictorial
features, typeface
Two types of evidence on congruency:
1. Schema-theory (Mandler, 1982): Moderate
incongruity is most persuasive
Heckler & Childres, 1992; Törn, 2012; Halkias & Kokkinaki,
2013; Yoon, 2013; …
2. Numerous findings where a match between
creative details and the ad results in more
persuasion
Typeface @ emac2015 5
• Image properties: Peracchio & Meyers-Levy, 2005
• Online banners & banner blindness: Hervet et al,
2010
• Endorser relevance: Sengupta et al, 1997
• Logo color: Bottomley & Doyle, 2006
• …
Janssens, De Pelsmacker & Geuens, 2012 both effects:
internet page + ad
-Congruence benefit for limited processing
-Incongruence benefit for extended processing
Typeface @ emac2015 6
HYPOTHESES ON TYPEFACE CONGRUENCE
1. Congruence > Incongruence
Typeface is a subtle ad element, thus a Type 2 effect
2. Negative effect of incongruence especially when
overselling
Advertising a casual product with a luxurious
typeface
Typeface @ emac2015 7
TYPEFACE EFFECTS – PRIOR EVIDENCE
Van Rompay & Pruyn (2011); zie ook Bottomley &
Doyle
8
Typeface @ emac2015 9
PRETESTS; N = 20
• Fonts:
– Din = casual
– Counselor Script = luxurious
• Products/Advertisements
Water – low involvement product
– DasaniTM = casual
– IsklarTM = luxurious
Car tires – high involvement product
– KuhmoTM = luxurious
– PirelliTM = casual
[Changed Pirelli in Kuhmo to avoid prior associations]
10
11
Target stimuli water bottles
Casual positioning, Casual typeface Casual positioning, Luxurious typeface
Luxurious positioning, Casual typeface Luxurious positioning, Luxurious typeface
Target stimuli car tires
Casual positioning, Casual typeface Casual positioning, Luxurious typeface
Luxurious positioning, Casual typeface Luxurious positioning, Luxurious typeface
METHODE
2 (product positioning: luxurious vs. casual) x
2 (typeface: congruent vs. incongruent) x
2 (matching: congruence for low vs. high involvement
product)
mixed design, Latin square
N = 98, i.e. 49 per BS condition
Measures:
Aad & Brand credibility (semantic differentials); Price
expectation
13
RESULTATEN
Aad
per product type, product positioning and typeface
congruence
14
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Incongruent Congruent Incongruent Congruent
Water Tire
Casual
Luxurious
Brand Credibility
15
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Incongruent Congruent Incongruent Congruent
Water Tire
Casual
Luxurious
Price expectation (water: euro-cent voor water; tires: euro)
16
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Incongruent Congruent Incongruent Congruent
Water Tire
Casual
Luxurious
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION
Ad typeface seems to fit within the subtle type of
congruence effects where congruence is more
persuasive than (moderate) incongruence
Effect for low & high involvement product
Replicability of negative effect for casual incongruity? Is
this an attention effect?
17
THE RIGHT FONT FOR THE JOB
EFFECT OF TYPEFACE-PRODUCT CONGRUENCY
ON ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE AD
Tim Smits
KU Leuven
@timsmitstim
Tim.smits@soc.kuleuven.be
PRESENTED @ emac2015
Collaboration:
Robin Van der Sar
Goele Aerts (KU Leuven)

Emac2015.typeface.smits etal

  • 1.
    THE RIGHT FONTFOR THE JOB EFFECT OF TYPEFACE-PRODUCT CONGRUENCY ON ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE AD Tim Smits KU Leuven @timsmitstim Tim.smits@soc.kuleuven.be PRESENTED @ EMAC2015 Collaboration: Robin Van der Sar Goele Aerts (KU Leuven)
  • 2.
    BACKGROUND “The great artin writing advertisements, is the finding out a proper method to catch the reader's eye, without which a good thing may pass over unobserved, or be lost among commissions of bankrupt. […] I must not here omit the blind Italian character, which being scarce legible, always fixes and detains the eye, and gives the curious reader something like the satisfaction of prying into a secret.” Typeface @ emac2015 2
  • 3.
    BACKGROUND “The great artin writing advertisements, is the finding out a proper method to catch the reader's eye, without which a good thing may pass over unobserved, or be lost among commissions of bankrupt. […] I must not here omit the blind Italian character, which being scarce legible, always fixes and detains the eye, and gives the curious reader something like the satisfaction of prying into a secret.” Addison, 1710 Typeface @ emac2015 3
  • 4.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic_Sans “The Boston Phoenixreported on disgruntlement over the widespread use of the font, especially its incongruous use for writing on serious subjects, with the complaints urged on by a campaign started by two Indianapolis graphic designers, Dave and Holly Combs, via their website "Ban Comic Sans". The movement was conceived in 1999 by the two designers, after an employer insisted that one of them use Comic Sans in a children's museum exhibit” “In the Netherlands popular radio DJs Coen Swijnenberg and Sander Lantinga decided to celebrate the font by having a Comic Sans day on the first Friday of July. Comic Sans Day has been held since 2009. Some Dutch companies have their website in Comic Sans on this day.” Typeface @ emac2015 4
  • 5.
    CONGRUENCY IN ADS Matchbetween a creative choice and strategic (brand) positioning : colors, endorsers, humor, pictorial features, typeface Two types of evidence on congruency: 1. Schema-theory (Mandler, 1982): Moderate incongruity is most persuasive Heckler & Childres, 1992; Törn, 2012; Halkias & Kokkinaki, 2013; Yoon, 2013; … 2. Numerous findings where a match between creative details and the ad results in more persuasion Typeface @ emac2015 5
  • 6.
    • Image properties:Peracchio & Meyers-Levy, 2005 • Online banners & banner blindness: Hervet et al, 2010 • Endorser relevance: Sengupta et al, 1997 • Logo color: Bottomley & Doyle, 2006 • … Janssens, De Pelsmacker & Geuens, 2012 both effects: internet page + ad -Congruence benefit for limited processing -Incongruence benefit for extended processing Typeface @ emac2015 6
  • 7.
    HYPOTHESES ON TYPEFACECONGRUENCE 1. Congruence > Incongruence Typeface is a subtle ad element, thus a Type 2 effect 2. Negative effect of incongruence especially when overselling Advertising a casual product with a luxurious typeface Typeface @ emac2015 7
  • 8.
    TYPEFACE EFFECTS –PRIOR EVIDENCE Van Rompay & Pruyn (2011); zie ook Bottomley & Doyle 8
  • 9.
  • 10.
    PRETESTS; N =20 • Fonts: – Din = casual – Counselor Script = luxurious • Products/Advertisements Water – low involvement product – DasaniTM = casual – IsklarTM = luxurious Car tires – high involvement product – KuhmoTM = luxurious – PirelliTM = casual [Changed Pirelli in Kuhmo to avoid prior associations] 10
  • 11.
    11 Target stimuli waterbottles Casual positioning, Casual typeface Casual positioning, Luxurious typeface Luxurious positioning, Casual typeface Luxurious positioning, Luxurious typeface
  • 12.
    Target stimuli cartires Casual positioning, Casual typeface Casual positioning, Luxurious typeface Luxurious positioning, Casual typeface Luxurious positioning, Luxurious typeface
  • 13.
    METHODE 2 (product positioning:luxurious vs. casual) x 2 (typeface: congruent vs. incongruent) x 2 (matching: congruence for low vs. high involvement product) mixed design, Latin square N = 98, i.e. 49 per BS condition Measures: Aad & Brand credibility (semantic differentials); Price expectation 13
  • 14.
    RESULTATEN Aad per product type,product positioning and typeface congruence 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Incongruent Congruent Incongruent Congruent Water Tire Casual Luxurious
  • 15.
    Brand Credibility 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Incongruent CongruentIncongruent Congruent Water Tire Casual Luxurious
  • 16.
    Price expectation (water:euro-cent voor water; tires: euro) 16 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Incongruent Congruent Incongruent Congruent Water Tire Casual Luxurious
  • 17.
    DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Ad typeface seemsto fit within the subtle type of congruence effects where congruence is more persuasive than (moderate) incongruence Effect for low & high involvement product Replicability of negative effect for casual incongruity? Is this an attention effect? 17
  • 18.
    THE RIGHT FONTFOR THE JOB EFFECT OF TYPEFACE-PRODUCT CONGRUENCY ON ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE AD Tim Smits KU Leuven @timsmitstim Tim.smits@soc.kuleuven.be PRESENTED @ emac2015 Collaboration: Robin Van der Sar Goele Aerts (KU Leuven)

Editor's Notes

  • #7 Wim Janssens, Patrick De Pelsmacker and Maggie Geuens, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2012, pp. 579-604 Three studies investigate the moderating role of divided attention in the relationship between thematic (in)congruency between a web page and a web ad, and evaluations of and click intention towards the embedded web ad. The first study establishes the traditional priming effect in sequential web page – web ad exposure. Study two manipulates viewers’ opportunity to divide their attention when simultaneously exposed to a web page and a web ad, and Study three measures divided attention by means of gaze jumps in a simultaneous exposure situation. In the case of simultaneous exposure to a web page and a web ad, a congruency effect occurs when there is little opportunity to divide the attention between the web page and the ad, and when there are few gaze jumps between the web page and the web ad. In these cases, web ads that are thematically congruent with the web page result in more positive responses. This effect reverses when there is more opportunity to divide the attention between the web page and the web ad, and when the number of gaze jumps is high: web ads incongruent with the web page lead to more positive responses. Undivided attention benefits web ads that are congruent with the web page in which they are embedded, but divided attention benefits those that are incongruent with the web page.
  • #15 -Participants had more positive attitudes towards the pair of congruently advertised stimuli they saw (M = 5.40, SD = .54) than towards the incongruently advertised pair of stimuli (M = 3.88, SD = .66; t(97) = 19.52, F(1, 96) = 392.07, p < .001). H1 -The main effect was qualified in multiple ways. First, congruency interacted with brand positioning (F(1,96) = 77.25, p < .001). As is demonstrated in Figure 1, congruency had a stronger effect for casual brands (Mcongruent = 5.14, SD = .69; Mincongruent = 3.07, SD = .93; t(97) = 18.99, p < .001) than for luxurious brands (Mcongruent = 5.66, SD = .82; Mincongruent = 4.69, SD = .93; t(97) = 7.96, p < .001). H2
  • #18 Verder onderzoek: -meer producten -ander design met meer deelnemers