This document discusses considerations for increasing the impact and visibility of open journal systems (OJS) journals in Brazil. It provides details on the author's activities supporting OJS implementation and journal indexing. Key points include that open access and proper indexing in databases like Web of Science are important for visibility and citations. Adherence to publication schedules and geographic diversity can also influence indexing. The document highlights Maringá State University's success in increasing the impact of its journals through optimal OJS management and indexing in major databases.

1. OJS journals in Brazil: considerations for increased impact and visibility EdilsonDamasio, MsC. Librarian / Bibliotecário – Maringá StateUniversityPress - UEM/Eduem edilsondamasio@gmail.com DAMASIO, E., Sept../2011 CreativeCommons

3. Maringá StateUniversity-UEM-1997-

4. Knowledge Portal– ANVISA- NationalAgency for Surveillance -2002-2003

5. Software Openbiblio

6. Pan-American Health Organization (Bireme/Opas/Oms)-2002-2003 *organizationthatmanagesthe SciELO/Fapesp

7. Scientificproduction (indexing) UEM - 2000-2007

8. Capes Portal (15.000 journals) capacitation for researcher in UEM-2002-2006

10. LibrarianEduem(Publisher) 2007-

11. ScientificJournalsof UEM 2006- (OJS 2.1.1.0)

12. OJS Capacitation for publishers in Brazil (UEM) 2007-

13. Journalsindexingsuportand manager (20 journals.UEM)-2007-

14. DOI (Digital ObjectIdentifier) activation (UEM)-2008- pioneer in Brazil, 3.500 activated for Journalsarticles and Conferences

16. Internacionalizationofscientificproduction

17. ImpactFactormapping – ISI-WOS (Acta Scientiarum Journals) - 8 journals

18. ImpactFactormapping – SCOPUS (Scimago-SIR)

19. Processindexing manager (UEM journals) WOS/Scopus/SciELO – 9 journals

20. InCITESstudies – Thomson Reuters

22. 5.000 articlespubl.

23. 14.000 articles sist.

24. 23.000 users

25. 1.100 articles (editorial flow)-3.500 articleswith DOI -5.000 access/day (Brazil/USA/UE) -articleswith 10.000 downloads-PDF OJS 2.3.6.0

27. 2 WoS

28. 6 Scopus

29. 1 SciELO

32. OA is available

33. The content is important also, and the responsibility is to the revievers and editores

35. Indicated methodology for publication –Capes - Brazilian Agency for Improvement Higher Education (2006-)

36. SciELO – the OJS utilized for (editorial flow) with name “submission” (2008-)

37. IBICTimplemens courses for universities

38. Various universities implant this OJS Journals in a Portal

39. In the universities the capacitations is constant

40. Traditional journals transfer to OJS yours on-line publications

41. Editorial teams is capacitated by the editors and staff (sections editors, reviewers)

43. IBICT – distance education for new institutional users

45. including the journal's content

46. focus

47. format

48. adherence to publication schedule

49. and geographic origin

50. important consideration is the journal's citation record

51. how often the journal is cited

53. INDEXINGImportantcriteriousWoS/Scopus

54. Case (ActaScientiarum. Agronomy) – OJS – 5 years

55. Case (ActaScientiarum. Agronomy) – OJS – 5 years

56. Case (ActaScientiarum. Agronomy) – OJS – 5 years

57. Brazilians Journals in JCR Science Edition (ISI Web of Knowledge)

59. The editorial flow is easyandfunctional

60. Possibility to work (editors; reviewers) different countries

61. The time of editorial flowisveryimportant

62. The management ofjournals is easelywith OJS

63. Thisvisibility is a consequenceofoptimal management

65. OJS is a Systems for publishers

66. The integration to OAI-PMH is essential, and OJS promoteus

68. ThankYou!