1. EXAMINING POTENTIAL
TRADE-OFF EFFECTS OF HRM
INVESTMENTS IN EMPLOYABILITY
JOS AKKERMANS, MARIA TIMS,
SUSANNE BEIJER, & NELE DE CUYPER
EAWOP Meeting 2017, Dublin, Ireland
2. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM THIS PRESENTATION
THE EMPLOYABILITY MANAGEMENT PARADOX MIGHT NOT EXIST AT ALL…
Increases in external employability do not diminish commitment
HRM HAS AN IMPORTANT ROLE TO PLAY
High-commitment HRM practices are positively related to commitment
via internal and external employability
HRM BLACK BOX
Employability might be a mechanism through which HRM practices
relate to outcomes
4. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
4 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
THE EMPLOYABILITY MANAGEMENT PARADOX
Investing in employees helps
them develop their
competencies: that’s great!
But won’t that make them less
attached to the organization
and potentially leave…?
5. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
5 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
THE EMPLOYABILITY MANAGEMENT PARADOX
SHOULD ORGANIZATIONS INVEST IN EMPLOYABILITY?
Evidence thus far seems positive (e.g., Philippaers et al., 2016; Nelissen et al., 2017; AOM
conferences 2014, 2016)
Potential advantages: increase in human capital, more competent employees
Potential disadvantages: risk of diminished commitment and turnover…?
Research thus far is incomplete (no HRM; external only)
HIGH-COMMITMENT HRM PRACTICES (e.g., Arthur, 1999; Whitener, 2001)
Training & Development
Performance Management
Communication & Participation
6. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
6 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY (Blau, 1964; Cropanzano & Mitchell, 2005)
Social interactions are shaped by a reciprocal exchange of rewards
Norm of reciprocity investments have signaling effect
Attitudinal “pathway”
Economic “pathway”
When taking HRM investments into account, we expect that the EMP
does not exist
7. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
7 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
RESEARCH MODEL
HRM
T&D
HRM
PM
HRM
C&P
External
PE
Internal
PE
Organizational
Commitment
Added expectation: indirect path via internal PE will be stronger than indirect path via external PE
8. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
8 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
METHOD
TWO STUDIES
T1 – T2: 6 weeks in between
T2 – T3: 1 year in between
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
T1 – T2 Sample: T1 – T3 Sample:
N = 437 N = 127
60.6% female, Mage = 34.6 69.3% female, Mage = 36.4
Analyses
SEM using Amos 23, bootstrapping to test indirect effects
Study 1: x = T1, mediator and outcomes = T2 (6 weeks later)
Study 2: x = T1, mediator and outcomes = T2 (1 year later)
9. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
9 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
RESULTS
First number = T1-T2; second number = T1-T3
10. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
10 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
RESULTS
T1-T2 SAMPLE
PC and TD indirectly related to commitment via employability
Indirect relationship via internal not stronger than via external
T1-T3 SAMPLE
PC indirectly related to commitment via employability
Indirect relationship via internal not stronger than via external
OVERALL
No evidence for a trade-off effect
11. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
11 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
THE MANAGEMENT PARADOX MIGHT NOT EXIST
No trade-off for organizations of investing in employability
ESPECIALLY PARTICIPATION & COMMUNICATION SEEMS RELEVANT
Important driver of commitment via employability
Training & development also important (T1-T2 sample)
HRM BLACK BOX
Role of employability as mechanism through which HRM impacts
outcomes
12. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
12 Trade-off effects of investing in employability?
WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
j.akkermans@vu.nl
www.josakkermans.com