E A T I N G P R A C T I C E S I N B U D D H I S T
M O N A S T E R I E S O F M E D I E V A L I N D I A A N D
C H I N A
B Y : R I C H A R D M A T H E R
The Bonze’s Begging Bowl
Today’s Class:
� Author focuses on the 5th century poet Shen Yueh
[Shen Yue] (441-513) who had a lot to say about
various Buddhist practices.
� Essay I: “On Keeping the Tradition of the Monk’s
Midday Meal” –about monk’s mid-afternoon meal
� Essay II: “On Keeping the Tradition of the Maigre
Feast” –about the religious rule for monks to beg for
food
� Essay III: “On Ultimate Compassion” –about
vegetarianism in Buddhism
Essay I: “On Keeping the Tradition of the Monk’s
Midday Meal”
“The reason people do not attain enlightenment is because their minds are confused and
deluded, and the reason their minds are confused and deluded is because external things
disturb them. The three greatest disturbing factors are ambition, sex, and food. Although
ambition may occupy the mind daily, the essential thing is to avoid a moment-by-moment
enslavement to it. Sex is of course a relatively more serious matter. But food is the worst
slavery of them all. These three are the root out of which all other evils grow, like branches
and leaves. The Buddha understood that if these three are not eradicated, there is no point
from which one may begin to seek enlightenment, so he had to find a method for making the
eradication as simple and easy as possible. He could have just said, ‘These three things are
the root of all evil and are therefore strictly forbidden.’ But these three are precisely the
things about which human feelings are most deluded and hence they are extremely difficult
to dismiss by mere conscious thought. Even if the Buddha had wanted to prohibit them, in
the end enforcing the prohibition would have been well-nigh impossible. It’s like a raft of
lashed boats crossing a river. Not that the boatman would not want to cross directly to the
opposite shore. But since the current is swift there is no possibility of crossing directly. So he
has no choice but to cross diagonally with the current, and only after a long time finally to
reach the other side…For this reason the Buddha moved up the evening meal to before
midday. Thus, after midday the monks can be pure and free from distraction. Because of this
freedom their conscious thoughts become simpler….”
Essay I (cont.)
� What is Shen Yue’s main argument here?
� What point is he making with the analogy of the
boatman crossing the river?
� Shen Yue’s argument here is based on the early
Indian rules that were set up for monks before
Buddhism came to China. In those rules, the monks
were totally dependent on the generosity of others
for all of his necessities so that he could focus on
enlightenment. Ideal was a homeless monk.
� Argument is that gluttony is a huge problem for
achieving enlightenment (the worst?).
Essay II: “On Keeping th ...
E A T I N G P R A C T I C E S I N B U D D H I S T M O N .docx
1. E A T I N G P R A C T I C E S I N B U D D H I S T
M O N A S T E R I E S O F M E D I E V A L I N D I A A N
D
C H I N A
B Y : R I C H A R D M A T H E R
The Bonze’s Begging Bowl
Today’s Class:
�
[Shen Yue] (441-513) who had a lot to say about
various Buddhist practices.
�
Midday Meal” –about monk’s mid-afternoon meal
� ping the Tradition of the Maigre
Feast” –about the religious rule for monks to beg for
food
� –about
vegetarianism in Buddhism
Essay I: “On Keeping the Tradition of the Monk’s
Midday Meal”
2. “The reason people do not attain enlightenment is because their
minds are confused and
deluded, and the reason their minds are confused and deluded is
because external things
disturb them. The three greatest disturbing factors are ambition,
sex, and food. Although
ambition may occupy the mind daily, the essential thing is to
avoid a moment-by-moment
enslavement to it. Sex is of course a relatively more serious
matter. But food is the worst
slavery of them all. These three are the root out of which all
other evils grow, like branches
and leaves. The Buddha understood that if these three are not
eradicated, there is no point
from which one may begin to seek enlightenment, so he had to
find a method for making the
eradication as simple and easy as possible. He could have just
said, ‘These three things are
the root of all evil and are therefore strictly forbidden.’ But
these three are precisely the
things about which human feelings are most deluded and hence
they are extremely difficult
to dismiss by mere conscious thought. Even if the Buddha had
wanted to prohibit them, in
the end enforcing the prohibition would have been well-nigh
impossible. It’s like a raft of
lashed boats crossing a river. Not that the boatman would not
want to cross directly to the
opposite shore. But since the current is swift there is no
possibility of crossing directly. So he
has no choice but to cross diagonally with the current, and only
after a long time finally to
reach the other side…For this reason the Buddha moved up the
evening meal to before
midday. Thus, after midday the monks can be pure and free
from distraction. Because of this
3. freedom their conscious thoughts become simpler….”
Essay I (cont.)
�
� th the analogy of the
boatman crossing the river?
�
Indian rules that were set up for monks before
Buddhism came to China. In those rules, the monks
were totally dependent on the generosity of others
for all of his necessities so that he could focus on
enlightenment. Ideal was a homeless monk.
�
achieving enlightenment (the worst?).
Essay II: “On Keeping the Tradition of the Maigre
Feast”
�
�
terrible,
monks are not expected to starve themselves.
�
followed in China, particularly as monasteries with
permanent settlements were set up for monks.
4. �
should he go to the same households over and over again?
Should he limit the opportunities for others to gain good
karma by focusing on one small area? How should the
money that is gathered by the monks be divided?
Essay II (cont.)
�
developed one: completely independent.
� cilities.
� -free land, and pious
donors gave away their own land for the use of the
sangha.
�
family.
�
and NOT begging.
Essay II (cont.) Maigre Feasts
�
monks and Buddhist laypeople on certain
commemorative days or on special occasions.
�
to such a rite: periodic communal feasts held in the
5. of popular religion on Buddhism.
�
feasts”).
Essay II (cont): Maigre Feasts
“For the cultivation of any religious observance there is always
a reason. The
modern practice of inviting monks and instead of filling their
alms bowls
merely preparing one feast for them all probably originated
from the time
long ago when the Buddha was still in the world and used to
accept people’s
invitations to meals. People now use this means to create a
simulation of that
precedent….Those who leave their families to become monks
are expected to
be supported by their begging rounds….No permission is given
for the monks
either to set up their own kitchens or to keep servants. But
today, since they
have amassed an ample store of food within their monasteries,
the practice of
begging has fallen into disuse. If by some accident a monk were
to show up at
someone’s gate holding an almsbowl, he would immediately be
cursed for
being a monk and at the same time doing something so utterly
vulgar and
degrading. Since it is something everybody despises and is
ashamed of, there
6. are no longer any monks who go about begging. Everyone
assumes the
tradition is no longer workable. But if the Buddha himself
possessing as he
did the nobility of an all-knowing deity, if even he could carry
an alms bowl in
his hand and go on his rounds to bring merit to the donors, does
not his
example apply to common, ordinary monks a thousand years
later whose own
persons and status are low-class and menial and who are
accustomed to
providing for their own mouths and bellies?”
Essay II (cont): Maigre Feasts
� oday’s invitations of monks to a single maigre
feast are concerned, since they are at least a simulation of
the original begging rounds, whether the monks go
begging or accept the invitation really makes no
difference. But, in consideration of the fact that today’s
monks no longer go begging, if we were to add the
possibility that they might no longer be invited to maigre
feasts as well, that would mean that the whole tradition
of begging would henceforth go into oblivion. If that
should happen, the monks would no longer belong to the
Buddha lineage and once that is gone the Three Jewels
will have fallen to earth…”
�
think they are important? How to they influence the
sangha?
7. Essay III: “Discourse on Ultimate Compassion”
�
that you can not eat meat because it removes one’s seeds
of compassion] came east to this land the “three
pure” (forms of meat consumption) have been
discontinued. People have wholeheartedly submitted to
the sutra’s ultimate teaching and have applied its
standards on an ever-widening scale. If this continues
then the violent taking of life will come to an end and the
growing of vegetables will never slacken…Autumn fowls
and summer eggs will become as untouchable as floating
clouds, furry creatures of the hills and fish of the sea will
become as gross as the decayed rat to a bird…”
�
Buddhism is COMPASSION and eating animals is not
compassionate.
Conclusions
Shen Yue is calling for a refocus of the Buddhist faith.
Monks need to remember the following:
�
which prevents enlightenment.
�
must instead focus on Maigre meals and accept
charity when it comes to them. They must remember
that they have vowed a life of poverty.
� t is