Real Estate and Urban
Development
Lecturer: Prof. Karl Kluegel, Urban Development


Student: NGUYEN DAN QUYNH VGU 2010-2011
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld




CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………….….2

II. THE RESON OF RESEARCH………………………………………………….…. 4

III. METHO OF EVELUATION…………………………………………………………4

IV. EVALUATION………………………………………………………………….….5




        1. Design and Image analysis___________________________5

        2. Parking___________________________________________6

        3. Traffic____________________________________________6

        4. Marketing_________________________________________7

        5. Economic_________________________________________9

        6. Social __________________________________________ 13

        7. Inveronment_______________________________________13

        8.

V. In conclusion…………………………………………………………………..15

Reference




Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                      Page 1
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld


  I. INTRODUCTION:

          1. The main function of building

The high-rise building - Sabeco World Trade Center, located on 2-4-6 Hai Ba Trung
Street, Ben Nghe Ward, District 1 is Complex Building included Hotel sixth star, Grade
A International Standard Office for Rent, retail service convention hall commercial
center and basement using for parking elevators related utilities. However, the number
of apartments for rent is limited just about 5%- 7% area of building. The architectural
planning criteria:
          +   Lot size: 6044 m2
         + Number of storey : 40 storey          (without basement, mezzanine, and
           terrace)
         + Maximum building height: 170 m.
         + Maximum of Building density- space for development: 3626,40 m2 ( 60%)
         + Plot ratio : 15 (regardless of building floor area of basement garage and
           technical level)
         + Minimum building Setback 4m.
         + Estimated construction cost: $160 million.


           2. Describes the building:

The building is design by 2 principal component – one is a high-rise tower with 40-
storey, another is a podium block with 5-storey, which is separate by a walking street.
This is an important design which creates difference of the building. The design
emphasizes simplicity in form and function in the midst of a cluttered architectural
environment.

According to describe of the designer, the building has a triangular shape with a large
floor plates at the center of the tower. With the shape like this, a triangle shape is
chosen because it could province 20% more of the office area with river views as
compared with conventionally-shaped buildings. Internally, the tower transforms to
accommodate different space requirements. The hotel is located at upper floors to
command better views while the lower levels house the offices. The residential
component is located immediately below the hotel component so both components can
share some recreational facilities. In addition, the wedge-shaped site has influenced the
design of the retail and convention podium block to take on a trapezoidal shape. All the
retails and F&B Functions are concentrated in the lower floors of the podium block while
the upper level of the podium block houses the international conferences and seminar
rooms. The overall simplicity of the building's form has a richly textured cladding system


Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                   Page 2
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld


made up of glass and metal, providing another beautiful skyscraper for Ho Chi Minh
City.




Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                            Page 3
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld




2-4-6 HAI BA TRUNG, DIST1, HCMC


II. THE REASON OF RESEARCH:

The objective of this paper is to analyze about the real estate in Ho Chi Minh City,
particularly District 1 through towers are building and will be built. To doing that,each
members in class will choose one project in District 1 reported by CBRE, Vietnam Real
Estate to reported. Besides that learning how to evaluate a building - it is necessary for
developing society and economic.


III.METHOD OF EVALUATION:

A set of criteria which was discussed and collected from all of the ideas of the members
in class choose the appropriate criteria for this paper. And then the end seven criteria
were selected such as design and image, parking capacity, traffic, market analysis,
economic, social, environment. (Table 1)




Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                   Page 4
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld


Using the proper availability of information about Sabeco Tower from Design Company
and the Departments and the real estate webs such as: CBRE, Viet Nam national real
estate association, Vietnam economic forum and Skyscraper Asian analysis.

Collecting reports about the real estate in Ho Chi Minh in recent years is to evaluate
some criteria such as marketing, designing.

Using some technical calculation to estimate some criteria such as parking and
economic analysis


    IV. EVALUATION:

      Table 1: Real estate assessment criteria

No. Criteria              Notes on method        Assessment
1   Design                Social harmony         Beautiful and luxury interior and
                          Social status          exterior decoration
2     Parking Capacity    Motorbikes             Not have information to assess
                          Cars                   however according the calculate the
                                                 parking will be enough if it was build
                                                 2 basement
3     Traffic             Accessibility          Easy – not have traffic jam in the
                          Mobility               peak hours.
4     Market analysis                            Faced to a lot of challenges.
5     Economic            Calculation            Face to a lot of challenges because
                          Rent cost/total cost   price for lease always change due to
                                                 economic crisis.
6     Social impact       Analyze     at    500m Provide for the real estate a huge
                          radius                 area about office, retail, hotel…
7     Environmental                              Be interest in about environment in
      friendly                                   design.


          1. Design and Image analysis:

The building which is one of important points in city takes part in huge skyscrapers in
CBD to create a magnificent Melinh square. Comparative with current building with 2-3
stories belong Sabeco beverage, the new Sabeco Tower will be change the face of area
around also is linking point between district 1 and district 2-Thu Thiem District.



Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                Page 5
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld


Now the building is not built however the license and advertise has been done.
However, there is the International Architecture Design Contest Sabeco in 2008.
Currently, the HOK Company – Hongkong was an experience company about high- rise
building designed it. According to design, to have a integrate shape and transitional
space between areas around, the designers is take care of environment by the way
that they create a walking street in a building friendly with residents. It makes building
become unique and more luxury.

However, architect Dan (2008) criticized that this building will overwhelm the buildings
around by a large scale of project. Another person said that with the glassy design of
building is again effect to the harmony between traditional material and new material
building. In my opinion, this is a beautiful project and combines with nearby skyscrapers
which will create a landscape harmony for Bach Dang Quay and Me Linh square.

          2Parking capacity:
Being lacking of information about the area for the parking, this paper will calculate the
number traffic in this building to estimate the number of basement ones depend on the
Viet Nam Stander for designing. If the number of basement is about one or two floor, it
will be easy to accept.

Supposing that whole area 6044m 2 (1) using for parking and technique

Area for parking per car                                18 m2

Area for parking motorbike, bike                       2.5 m2

Area for technique                            10 %- 604.4 m2     (2)

    Parking area                          (1) –(2)= 5440 m2     (3)

         + Gross rental revenue at 100% occupancy : 70.026.652
         + The area for each floor 2266.5 with 5% using for auxiliary block such as
           toilet, passage-way  the space for development 2153 m2
                  65 apartments
                   With 4 apartment/1 car, 1apartment /3 motorbike+ bike
                    16 cars and 195 motorbike
                    775,5 m2        (a)

                  Office and retail for lease 1923 m2* (20+ 5) stories
                   With 100 m2/ 1car
                    480 cars
                    8.640 m2        (b)

Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                   Page 6
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld



                  Hotel grade A 272 rooms estimate
                   With 8 rooms/1 car
                    34 cars
                    612 m2        (c)

The area for parking            (a) + (b) + (c)   10.027,5 m2 (4)

In conclusion:

Comparison (3) and (4), the project needs to build 2 basements to adapt a number of
car and motorbike in building.

          3.Traffic:
The tower is located at Melinh square and surrounded by Hai Ba Trung, Thi Sách, Dong
du so it have many benefits for traffic in the time construction and using it.

Between two block of building, the design have a walking street and the all area of
basement using for parking so the access for residents and transport is easy.

Besides that, although this is a CBD but traffic jam in the peak hours rarely happen.
This is also an importable point for the investor and user when they choose this tower to
work. In addition, in case of unexpected things such as fire is the user have many the
street to escape because four face of building is contiguous with many street.

Moreover, the Sabeco tower is near many the bus station, which makes people have a
lot of change to access the building. It is also easy to connect with district 2 by Thu
Thiem tunnel and district 4 by Khanh Hoi Bridge.

All of assessment above, the accessibility to tower is good.

         9. Marketing:
According to the function of the Sabeco building, it will provide for the market real
estate: A m2 for apartment, b m2 for office for lease, room A for leases, C m2 for retail.
To assess this criteria, the rent price of building will comparison with available data from
CBRE in Q2-2011 to analyze the benefits and challenges of project




Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                     Page 7
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld




              Office market
Firstly, rents throughout all grades of office softened during the quarter, albeit at a
slower rate than Q1 2011. Renting Grade A in CBD decreased 1.3% quarter-on-
quarter. The average occupancy in second quarter decreased from 79.8 % at the end
of Q1 2011 to 82.5%. However, the grade A was still slower at approximately 66% than
Grade B,C at over 80%.

In addition, according to Trang Le, Manager of DTZ Occupier Services department
commented that the office landlords for all grades are still facing challenging times at
the end of the first half of 2011.




              Residential for sale market
Also like the office market, the residential for sale market continued to decline in quarter
of 2011. The number of new launched in the second quarter went us by 12.5% q-o-q


Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                     Page 8
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld


with a total of 4,926 units being launched. Therefore, many projects will be delay to look
for uptick in market sentiment.




               Retail market


Besides that although consumer confidence has fallen in the first half of 2011, a
relatively stable retail property market in Q2 2011. CBD department store rents went up
to 5.8% q-o-q to US$ 109.35 in the second quarter. According to the forecast, if the
economic recovery around in next four quarter, rents prime in CBD could still increase
due to short of available space.

In short, in front of this situation, this building cans unavoidable difficulties about rent
price and high vacancy rate. The first thing to overcome is try to introduce for user the
best services such as an increasing rent-free and fit-out periods, stepped rents or
complimentary parking spaces.


 5. Finance:
        Economic Feasibility:
         + Estimated construction cost: $160 million
         + Gross rental revenue at 100% occupancy with the space for development
           2153 m2
                                                                                       (1)
                    65 apartments level A 2.153 * 3 floors *35 USD/ apartment               *
                     12 months
                         2.712.780 USD

                    Office for lease 2.153 m2* 20 stories *20 USD/m2 *12 months
                          10.334.400 USD

                    Retail for lease 2.153 m2 *5storeies *150 USD/m2 *12 months
Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                     Page 9
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld


                         19.377.000 USD

                  Hotel grade A 2.153m2 * 12storey = 272* 400 USD/ day * 356
                   days.
                       38.732.800 USD

          + Gross rental                                   71.156.980 USD
         + 10% Vacancy Rate                                 7.115.698 USD
         + 35 % Operating Cost                             24.904.943 USD

    Net operating Income                                  39.136.339 USD
Break Even ROR      38.523.209/ 160.000.000                     24.46 %


         Items                                                 Amount( $)

         Project Cost                                          160.000.000

         Gross Retail revenue at 100% Occupancy                71.156.98

         10 % Vacancy Rate                                     7.115.698

         25% Operate Cost                                      24.904.943

         Net Operate Income                                    39.136.339

         Break Even ROR

                    Table 2. Rough Estimate of Economic Feasibility
Conclusion:
   -   Project is economically feasible if investor require ROR ≤ 24.06
   -   Project is economically not feasible at 25%       since   39.136.339/0.25 =
       155.545.356 income value < 160 million USA 3.454.644 loss
   -   Project generates substantial Development Profit at 23% required ROR=
       (39.136.339/0.23) – 160.000.000 = 10.157.995 USD
This build belong to Sabeco Beverage – one of the biggest company beverage in Viet
Nam.




Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                             Page 10
year             1                 2                3                4                  5                6            7            8              9                10

              Total cost for the building
             ( $ millions)                                        160,000,000
              Construction schedule
                                                                  0.50              0.25             0.25
              Total cost for the building
             ( $ millions)                                        80,000,000        40,000,000       40,000,000
              Equity ($ millions)                40%
                                                                  32,000,000        16,000,000       16,000,000
              Bank loan                          60%
                                                                  48,000,000        24,000,000       24,000,000
              Loan
                                                 96,000,000       48,000,000        72,000,000       96,000,000
              Debt payment
                                                                                                                      14,000,000         14,000,000       14,000,000   14,000,000   14,000,000     14,000,000       12,000,000
              Debt at the end of year
                                                                                                                      82,000,000         68,000,000       54,000,000   40,000,000   26,000,000     12,000,000       -
              Interest rate                      20 %

              Interest
                                                                  8,160,000         12,240,000       16,320,000       13,940,000         11,560,000       9,180,000    6,800,000    4,420,000      2,040,000        -

             Table 3 The Project Finance




                              year                                              3                4                5                6                  7
                                             1                2                                                                                                        8                   9                   10
 Gross Rental Revenues          67,599,131
(95%)


Vacancy Loss (%)                                                                                 15%              15%              10%                10%              5%                  5%                  5%

Vacancy Loss ($)                                                                                                                                                              3,379,957                                 3,379,957
                                                                                                 10,139,870       10,139,870       6,759,913          6,759,913                            3,379,957

                                                                                                 -                -                -                  -                -                   -                   -
Net Rental Revenues                                                                                                                                                         64,219,174                              64,219,174
                                                                                                 57,459,261       57,459,261       60,839,218         60,839,218                           64,219,174
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld


Expenses                                                                                                                                      12,843,835                        12,843,835
                                       6,759,913      6,759,913      6,759,913      11,491,852   11,491,852   12,167,844   12,167,844                      12,843,835
Interest and debt                                                                                                                             18,420,000                        12,000,000
                                       8,160,000      12,240,000     16,320,000     27,940,000   25,560,000   23,180,000   20,800,000                      16,040,000
Cash flows In years     142,463,846                                                                                                           32,955,340                        39,375,340
before taxes                           (14,919,913)   (18,999,913)   (23,079,913)   18,027,409   20,407,409   25,491,374   27,871,374                      35,335,340
Corporate Income Tax                                                 12.5%          12.5%        12.5%        12.5%        25%          25%                25%            25%
                                       -              -
 Cash flows In years                                                                                                                          24,716,505                        29,531,505
after taxes                            (14,919,913)   (18,999,913)   (20,194,924)   15,773,983   17,856,483   22,304,953   20,903,531                      26,501,505


Equity                    64,000,000

                                                                                                                                              24,716,505                        29,531,505
                       (64,000,000)    (14,919,913)   (18,999,913)   (20,194,924)   15,773,983   17,856,483   22,304,953   20,903,531                      26,501,505
IRR                    24.18%

Return on Equity                       -23.3%         -29.7%         -31.6%         24.6%        27.9%        34.9%        32.7%        38.6%              41.4%          46.1%

Break Even Occupancy                                                                68.6%        64.5%        58.1%        54.2%        48.7%              45.0%          38.7%
Rate
IRR                    24.18%




             Table 4 Cash Flows and IRR

             According to calculation, the result shows IRR of building is higher than interest rate assumption. It means the project will operate
             effective. However, in the economic crisis, the company always stands avoidable risks due to increasing interest rate, decreasing
             number of the resident renting.




             Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                                                                                                        Page 12
6. Social impact:

The building locates at center of city therefore it has many benefits:
- Security condition is always important criteria for building so the user can believe when
using this building.
-This area belongs Sabeco Beverage cooperate company without residents living so it
is not change the living of residents in this area. Besides that designing of building also
create pleasant for user by convenient and spatial relaxing.
- Besides that this building also provide for office, retail for lease makes stability prices
and create jobs for resident in city. However, the number labor work at Sabeco will have
to move to another place. It means the changing function of building also adversely
affect to living of worker.
- One of the points that the building locate at the best exorbitant place of city. So an
increasing number of investor comes to this area, which will affect to real estate market.

       7. Environment impact:

This maybe is a first building in CBD which is interest in environment inside the project.
Between two blocks is arranged a lot of trees created a green environment for user.
However, Viet Nam is one of countries in ASIA is offered hardly by change climate so
with the design cover glassy affect directly to environment of city. In addition, lack of
information about using energy, water and material for construction which make the
assessment become more difficult. Thus, we can hope that the expert company about
designing skyscrapers and many projects care about using effective energy and
environment, which will make the tower, become friendly building.


V. CONCLUSION


       No.      Criteria                     Ranking                       Score
                                             1   2   3       4    5
                                             Good                Bad
       1        Design                       1   2   3       4    5        2

       2        Parking Capacity             1    2     3    4    5        2

       3        Traffic                      1    2     3    4    5        1

       4        Market analysis              1    2     3    4    5        3

       5        Economic                     1    2     3    4    5        4
Real Estate and Urban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld



       6       Social impact                 1    2     3    4    5        2

       7       Environmental friendly        1    2     3    4    5        3

       Total                                                               15


This is an important building in center of city however in that time, the information is
very limit such as planning design, office space, hotel, apartment for lease. Several the
information is collected for internet so the accuracy have to limit, which make the
assessment of project meet a lot of difficulties.

However, standing at situation of investor, this is a good project to invest. It locates at a
beautiful sight so building will attract a lot of people coming to rent, work.

Reference
Changing tack
http://news.vneconomy.vn/20110805104543528P0C4/changing-tack.htm

The Market View Ho Chi Minh City In July 2011.

Mid Year Market Review, July 5, 2011.

Real Estate Market Get Nearer To Real Value
http://vnre.blogspot.com/2011/08/real-estate-market-gets-nearer-to-real.html


DTZ Vietnam Released Property time quater1-2011
http://vnre.blogspot.com/2011/04/dtz-vietnam-released-property-times.html


http://www.cbrevietnam.com/loadpage.php?page=homepage:

Sabeco Tower information:
http://www.skyscrapercity.com;
Document No 3212QHKT-QHKTT, 12/01/2010 from Ho Chi Minh Department of urban
planning
Diễn Đàn Doanh nghiệp- Business forum


http://dddn.com.vn/20110818082034574cat168/nhieu-ngan-hang-giam-lai-suat-cho-
vay-xuong-17nam.htm

Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012
                                                                                    Page 14

Dq1 assignment karl

  • 1.
    Real Estate andUrban Development Lecturer: Prof. Karl Kluegel, Urban Development Student: NGUYEN DAN QUYNH VGU 2010-2011
  • 2.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………….….2 II. THE RESON OF RESEARCH………………………………………………….…. 4 III. METHO OF EVELUATION…………………………………………………………4 IV. EVALUATION………………………………………………………………….….5 1. Design and Image analysis___________________________5 2. Parking___________________________________________6 3. Traffic____________________________________________6 4. Marketing_________________________________________7 5. Economic_________________________________________9 6. Social __________________________________________ 13 7. Inveronment_______________________________________13 8. V. In conclusion…………………………………………………………………..15 Reference Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 1
  • 3.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld I. INTRODUCTION: 1. The main function of building The high-rise building - Sabeco World Trade Center, located on 2-4-6 Hai Ba Trung Street, Ben Nghe Ward, District 1 is Complex Building included Hotel sixth star, Grade A International Standard Office for Rent, retail service convention hall commercial center and basement using for parking elevators related utilities. However, the number of apartments for rent is limited just about 5%- 7% area of building. The architectural planning criteria: + Lot size: 6044 m2 + Number of storey : 40 storey (without basement, mezzanine, and terrace) + Maximum building height: 170 m. + Maximum of Building density- space for development: 3626,40 m2 ( 60%) + Plot ratio : 15 (regardless of building floor area of basement garage and technical level) + Minimum building Setback 4m. + Estimated construction cost: $160 million. 2. Describes the building: The building is design by 2 principal component – one is a high-rise tower with 40- storey, another is a podium block with 5-storey, which is separate by a walking street. This is an important design which creates difference of the building. The design emphasizes simplicity in form and function in the midst of a cluttered architectural environment. According to describe of the designer, the building has a triangular shape with a large floor plates at the center of the tower. With the shape like this, a triangle shape is chosen because it could province 20% more of the office area with river views as compared with conventionally-shaped buildings. Internally, the tower transforms to accommodate different space requirements. The hotel is located at upper floors to command better views while the lower levels house the offices. The residential component is located immediately below the hotel component so both components can share some recreational facilities. In addition, the wedge-shaped site has influenced the design of the retail and convention podium block to take on a trapezoidal shape. All the retails and F&B Functions are concentrated in the lower floors of the podium block while the upper level of the podium block houses the international conferences and seminar rooms. The overall simplicity of the building's form has a richly textured cladding system Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 2
  • 4.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld made up of glass and metal, providing another beautiful skyscraper for Ho Chi Minh City. Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 3
  • 5.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld 2-4-6 HAI BA TRUNG, DIST1, HCMC II. THE REASON OF RESEARCH: The objective of this paper is to analyze about the real estate in Ho Chi Minh City, particularly District 1 through towers are building and will be built. To doing that,each members in class will choose one project in District 1 reported by CBRE, Vietnam Real Estate to reported. Besides that learning how to evaluate a building - it is necessary for developing society and economic. III.METHOD OF EVALUATION: A set of criteria which was discussed and collected from all of the ideas of the members in class choose the appropriate criteria for this paper. And then the end seven criteria were selected such as design and image, parking capacity, traffic, market analysis, economic, social, environment. (Table 1) Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 4
  • 6.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld Using the proper availability of information about Sabeco Tower from Design Company and the Departments and the real estate webs such as: CBRE, Viet Nam national real estate association, Vietnam economic forum and Skyscraper Asian analysis. Collecting reports about the real estate in Ho Chi Minh in recent years is to evaluate some criteria such as marketing, designing. Using some technical calculation to estimate some criteria such as parking and economic analysis IV. EVALUATION: Table 1: Real estate assessment criteria No. Criteria Notes on method Assessment 1 Design Social harmony Beautiful and luxury interior and Social status exterior decoration 2 Parking Capacity Motorbikes Not have information to assess Cars however according the calculate the parking will be enough if it was build 2 basement 3 Traffic Accessibility Easy – not have traffic jam in the Mobility peak hours. 4 Market analysis Faced to a lot of challenges. 5 Economic Calculation Face to a lot of challenges because Rent cost/total cost price for lease always change due to economic crisis. 6 Social impact Analyze at 500m Provide for the real estate a huge radius area about office, retail, hotel… 7 Environmental Be interest in about environment in friendly design. 1. Design and Image analysis: The building which is one of important points in city takes part in huge skyscrapers in CBD to create a magnificent Melinh square. Comparative with current building with 2-3 stories belong Sabeco beverage, the new Sabeco Tower will be change the face of area around also is linking point between district 1 and district 2-Thu Thiem District. Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 5
  • 7.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld Now the building is not built however the license and advertise has been done. However, there is the International Architecture Design Contest Sabeco in 2008. Currently, the HOK Company – Hongkong was an experience company about high- rise building designed it. According to design, to have a integrate shape and transitional space between areas around, the designers is take care of environment by the way that they create a walking street in a building friendly with residents. It makes building become unique and more luxury. However, architect Dan (2008) criticized that this building will overwhelm the buildings around by a large scale of project. Another person said that with the glassy design of building is again effect to the harmony between traditional material and new material building. In my opinion, this is a beautiful project and combines with nearby skyscrapers which will create a landscape harmony for Bach Dang Quay and Me Linh square. 2Parking capacity: Being lacking of information about the area for the parking, this paper will calculate the number traffic in this building to estimate the number of basement ones depend on the Viet Nam Stander for designing. If the number of basement is about one or two floor, it will be easy to accept. Supposing that whole area 6044m 2 (1) using for parking and technique Area for parking per car 18 m2 Area for parking motorbike, bike 2.5 m2 Area for technique 10 %- 604.4 m2 (2)  Parking area (1) –(2)= 5440 m2 (3) + Gross rental revenue at 100% occupancy : 70.026.652 + The area for each floor 2266.5 with 5% using for auxiliary block such as toilet, passage-way  the space for development 2153 m2  65 apartments With 4 apartment/1 car, 1apartment /3 motorbike+ bike  16 cars and 195 motorbike  775,5 m2 (a)  Office and retail for lease 1923 m2* (20+ 5) stories With 100 m2/ 1car  480 cars  8.640 m2 (b) Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 6
  • 8.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld  Hotel grade A 272 rooms estimate With 8 rooms/1 car  34 cars  612 m2 (c) The area for parking (a) + (b) + (c) 10.027,5 m2 (4) In conclusion: Comparison (3) and (4), the project needs to build 2 basements to adapt a number of car and motorbike in building. 3.Traffic: The tower is located at Melinh square and surrounded by Hai Ba Trung, Thi Sách, Dong du so it have many benefits for traffic in the time construction and using it. Between two block of building, the design have a walking street and the all area of basement using for parking so the access for residents and transport is easy. Besides that, although this is a CBD but traffic jam in the peak hours rarely happen. This is also an importable point for the investor and user when they choose this tower to work. In addition, in case of unexpected things such as fire is the user have many the street to escape because four face of building is contiguous with many street. Moreover, the Sabeco tower is near many the bus station, which makes people have a lot of change to access the building. It is also easy to connect with district 2 by Thu Thiem tunnel and district 4 by Khanh Hoi Bridge. All of assessment above, the accessibility to tower is good. 9. Marketing: According to the function of the Sabeco building, it will provide for the market real estate: A m2 for apartment, b m2 for office for lease, room A for leases, C m2 for retail. To assess this criteria, the rent price of building will comparison with available data from CBRE in Q2-2011 to analyze the benefits and challenges of project Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 7
  • 9.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld Office market Firstly, rents throughout all grades of office softened during the quarter, albeit at a slower rate than Q1 2011. Renting Grade A in CBD decreased 1.3% quarter-on- quarter. The average occupancy in second quarter decreased from 79.8 % at the end of Q1 2011 to 82.5%. However, the grade A was still slower at approximately 66% than Grade B,C at over 80%. In addition, according to Trang Le, Manager of DTZ Occupier Services department commented that the office landlords for all grades are still facing challenging times at the end of the first half of 2011. Residential for sale market Also like the office market, the residential for sale market continued to decline in quarter of 2011. The number of new launched in the second quarter went us by 12.5% q-o-q Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 8
  • 10.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld with a total of 4,926 units being launched. Therefore, many projects will be delay to look for uptick in market sentiment. Retail market Besides that although consumer confidence has fallen in the first half of 2011, a relatively stable retail property market in Q2 2011. CBD department store rents went up to 5.8% q-o-q to US$ 109.35 in the second quarter. According to the forecast, if the economic recovery around in next four quarter, rents prime in CBD could still increase due to short of available space. In short, in front of this situation, this building cans unavoidable difficulties about rent price and high vacancy rate. The first thing to overcome is try to introduce for user the best services such as an increasing rent-free and fit-out periods, stepped rents or complimentary parking spaces. 5. Finance: Economic Feasibility: + Estimated construction cost: $160 million + Gross rental revenue at 100% occupancy with the space for development 2153 m2 (1)  65 apartments level A 2.153 * 3 floors *35 USD/ apartment * 12 months  2.712.780 USD  Office for lease 2.153 m2* 20 stories *20 USD/m2 *12 months  10.334.400 USD  Retail for lease 2.153 m2 *5storeies *150 USD/m2 *12 months Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 9
  • 11.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld  19.377.000 USD  Hotel grade A 2.153m2 * 12storey = 272* 400 USD/ day * 356 days.  38.732.800 USD + Gross rental 71.156.980 USD + 10% Vacancy Rate 7.115.698 USD + 35 % Operating Cost 24.904.943 USD  Net operating Income 39.136.339 USD Break Even ROR 38.523.209/ 160.000.000 24.46 % Items Amount( $) Project Cost 160.000.000 Gross Retail revenue at 100% Occupancy 71.156.98 10 % Vacancy Rate 7.115.698 25% Operate Cost 24.904.943 Net Operate Income 39.136.339 Break Even ROR Table 2. Rough Estimate of Economic Feasibility Conclusion: - Project is economically feasible if investor require ROR ≤ 24.06 - Project is economically not feasible at 25% since 39.136.339/0.25 = 155.545.356 income value < 160 million USA 3.454.644 loss - Project generates substantial Development Profit at 23% required ROR= (39.136.339/0.23) – 160.000.000 = 10.157.995 USD This build belong to Sabeco Beverage – one of the biggest company beverage in Viet Nam. Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 10
  • 12.
    year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total cost for the building ( $ millions) 160,000,000 Construction schedule 0.50 0.25 0.25 Total cost for the building ( $ millions) 80,000,000 40,000,000 40,000,000 Equity ($ millions) 40% 32,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 Bank loan 60% 48,000,000 24,000,000 24,000,000 Loan 96,000,000 48,000,000 72,000,000 96,000,000 Debt payment 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 Debt at the end of year 82,000,000 68,000,000 54,000,000 40,000,000 26,000,000 12,000,000 - Interest rate 20 % Interest 8,160,000 12,240,000 16,320,000 13,940,000 11,560,000 9,180,000 6,800,000 4,420,000 2,040,000 - Table 3 The Project Finance year 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 8 9 10 Gross Rental Revenues 67,599,131 (95%) Vacancy Loss (%) 15% 15% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% Vacancy Loss ($) 3,379,957 3,379,957 10,139,870 10,139,870 6,759,913 6,759,913 3,379,957 - - - - - - - Net Rental Revenues 64,219,174 64,219,174 57,459,261 57,459,261 60,839,218 60,839,218 64,219,174
  • 13.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld Expenses 12,843,835 12,843,835 6,759,913 6,759,913 6,759,913 11,491,852 11,491,852 12,167,844 12,167,844 12,843,835 Interest and debt 18,420,000 12,000,000 8,160,000 12,240,000 16,320,000 27,940,000 25,560,000 23,180,000 20,800,000 16,040,000 Cash flows In years 142,463,846 32,955,340 39,375,340 before taxes (14,919,913) (18,999,913) (23,079,913) 18,027,409 20,407,409 25,491,374 27,871,374 35,335,340 Corporate Income Tax 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 25% 25% 25% 25% - - Cash flows In years 24,716,505 29,531,505 after taxes (14,919,913) (18,999,913) (20,194,924) 15,773,983 17,856,483 22,304,953 20,903,531 26,501,505 Equity 64,000,000 24,716,505 29,531,505 (64,000,000) (14,919,913) (18,999,913) (20,194,924) 15,773,983 17,856,483 22,304,953 20,903,531 26,501,505 IRR 24.18% Return on Equity -23.3% -29.7% -31.6% 24.6% 27.9% 34.9% 32.7% 38.6% 41.4% 46.1% Break Even Occupancy 68.6% 64.5% 58.1% 54.2% 48.7% 45.0% 38.7% Rate IRR 24.18% Table 4 Cash Flows and IRR According to calculation, the result shows IRR of building is higher than interest rate assumption. It means the project will operate effective. However, in the economic crisis, the company always stands avoidable risks due to increasing interest rate, decreasing number of the resident renting. Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 12
  • 14.
    6. Social impact: Thebuilding locates at center of city therefore it has many benefits: - Security condition is always important criteria for building so the user can believe when using this building. -This area belongs Sabeco Beverage cooperate company without residents living so it is not change the living of residents in this area. Besides that designing of building also create pleasant for user by convenient and spatial relaxing. - Besides that this building also provide for office, retail for lease makes stability prices and create jobs for resident in city. However, the number labor work at Sabeco will have to move to another place. It means the changing function of building also adversely affect to living of worker. - One of the points that the building locate at the best exorbitant place of city. So an increasing number of investor comes to this area, which will affect to real estate market. 7. Environment impact: This maybe is a first building in CBD which is interest in environment inside the project. Between two blocks is arranged a lot of trees created a green environment for user. However, Viet Nam is one of countries in ASIA is offered hardly by change climate so with the design cover glassy affect directly to environment of city. In addition, lack of information about using energy, water and material for construction which make the assessment become more difficult. Thus, we can hope that the expert company about designing skyscrapers and many projects care about using effective energy and environment, which will make the tower, become friendly building. V. CONCLUSION No. Criteria Ranking Score 1 2 3 4 5 Good Bad 1 Design 1 2 3 4 5 2 2 Parking Capacity 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 Traffic 1 2 3 4 5 1 4 Market analysis 1 2 3 4 5 3 5 Economic 1 2 3 4 5 4
  • 15.
    Real Estate andUrban Development – Lecturer: Prof.Dr.Karl Kluegeld 6 Social impact 1 2 3 4 5 2 7 Environmental friendly 1 2 3 4 5 3 Total 15 This is an important building in center of city however in that time, the information is very limit such as planning design, office space, hotel, apartment for lease. Several the information is collected for internet so the accuracy have to limit, which make the assessment of project meet a lot of difficulties. However, standing at situation of investor, this is a good project to invest. It locates at a beautiful sight so building will attract a lot of people coming to rent, work. Reference Changing tack http://news.vneconomy.vn/20110805104543528P0C4/changing-tack.htm The Market View Ho Chi Minh City In July 2011. Mid Year Market Review, July 5, 2011. Real Estate Market Get Nearer To Real Value http://vnre.blogspot.com/2011/08/real-estate-market-gets-nearer-to-real.html DTZ Vietnam Released Property time quater1-2011 http://vnre.blogspot.com/2011/04/dtz-vietnam-released-property-times.html http://www.cbrevietnam.com/loadpage.php?page=homepage: Sabeco Tower information: http://www.skyscrapercity.com; Document No 3212QHKT-QHKTT, 12/01/2010 from Ho Chi Minh Department of urban planning Diễn Đàn Doanh nghiệp- Business forum http://dddn.com.vn/20110818082034574cat168/nhieu-ngan-hang-giam-lai-suat-cho- vay-xuong-17nam.htm Student: Nguyen Dan Quynh VGU 2010-2012 Page 14