The partnership between brothers who owned a sugar mill was dissolved in 1944 when one brother filed a lawsuit. This led to litigation over the next several years regarding management of the mill and distribution of profits during receivership. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the date of dissolution was when the last summons was served in the 1944 lawsuit, not when it was filed. It restored the original trial court decree and rejected the High Court's ruling that limitation period began when the suit was filed rather than when all parties were served.