Mohsin Kamal, a shopkeeper, displayed African grey parrot eggs in his shop, which has been illegal under the Wildlife Act of 1954 and Wildlife and Countryside Act of 1981, as it is illegal to take, possess, control, or sell any wild bird eggs. Raja Ali Akbar filed a case against Mohsin Kamal under the wildlife safety complaint category. Mohsin Kamal argued that displaying items for sale is only an invitation to treat, not an offer to sell, but the court rejected this argument and considered that displaying the wild bird eggs for sale violated wildlife protection acts.

1. Case Name: Mohsin Kamal vs.Raja Ali Akbar
Contact of Caseagainst:
M/s. Mohsin Kamal, chaal Bazaar, Faisalabad.
Dealer of birds/pets
Complaint Category:Wild Life Safety
Case Description: The Wild Life Act of 1954
A shopkeeper namedMohsin Kamal displayed eggs of Africangrey parrot in hisshop.It has been
illegal to take the eggs of most wild birds since the Protection of Birds Act 1954 and it is illegal
to possess or control any wild birds' eggs taken since that time under the Wildlife and
Countryside Act 1981.It is illegal to sell any wild bird's egg, irrespective of its age.
The defendant argued that a display of anything in a show window is simply an offer to treat
and this means that, under contract law, it is the customer who makes the offer to buy the
eggs. Here the court considered that Parliament knew the technical law, at Common Law, of
the term 'offer'.The court simply said that the display of pets is only an invitation to treat not an
offer.