SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page5
Padmanabha Rao MA
114 Charak Sadan, Vikas Puri, New Delhi 110018, India, E-mail: raomap@yahoo.com
Received 28 January; accepted 23 March; published online 01 April; printed 16 April 2013
1. LATEST DISCOVERIES IN NUCLEAR AND X-RAY PHYSICS, ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, AND
SOLAR PHYSICS
1.1. What is already known?
In 1896, Antoine Henri Becquerel discovered the phenomenon
of natural radioactivity from potassium uranyl sulfate salt. When
the salt was subjected to magnetic field, the radiation he
detected has negative, positive, and electrically neutral
charges. Marie Curie termed 'radioactivity' to the phenomenon
of these new emissions. Ernest Rutherford, who studied the
properties of radioactive decay named these three radiations as
alpha, beta, and gamma. While brilliant phosphorescence from
the chemical compound potassium uranyl sulfate is well
documented, fluorescent light emission from individual excited
atoms in artificially produced radioisotopes remained elusive to
previous researchers.
1.2. New Physics
Over a century later to the
discovery of radioactivity by Henri
Becquerel, the author has
discovered two generations of γ, β
and X-ray emissions, namely
Bharat Radiation followed by UV
dominant optical radiation from
within the one and the same
excited atom of a radioisotope or
XRF source by Padmanabha Rao
Effect, a previously unknown
phenomenon,
1.3. A surprise finding
led to these new
findings in Physics
Many of the discoveries in science
resulted from an unexpected finding. A surprise finding, Rb XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) showing
125,321 cps instead of the expected 4,400 Rb X-ray photon yield sec-1 0.5 steradian-1 triggered this
entire study just to unfold why these spectacularly high counts. In the absence of prior theory or any
experimental study on the subject, further experiments incredibly suggested the possibility of optical
radiation with low quantum yield from the source.
1.4. Why previous researchers failed to detect the optical emission?
There are further reasons why optical emission has evaded from previous researchers all these years. Firstly, the dominant UV not only invisible like
ionizing radiations but also follows the later from one and the same source. Secondly, photomultiplier tube simultaneously detects γ, β, and X-ray
emissions as well as UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions.
1.5. Three Experimental Discoveries
After 4 years of experimental research at the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan State in India , author suspected that optical radiation might be the
cause for excessively high counts from Rb XRF source, but unsure whether it was merely luminescence. Another two years were spent in developing two
elegant optical techniques using narrow band optical filters in one technique and a pair of sheet polarizers in another technique that greatly helped in
providing first and definite evidence on light emission and in estimating very low UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities despite the interfering ionizing
DISCOVERY • LETTERS • PHYSICS Discovery, Volume 4, Number 10, April 2013
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions
discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources
ISSN2278–5469EISSN2278–5450
Henri Becquerel Marie Curie Pierre Curie Ernest
Rutherford
The experimental set up is a simple Gamma ray Spectrometer
from Electronics Corporation of India, Hyderabad, India. The
successful detection of UV dominant optical radiation from
radioisotopes and XRF sources owes to setting gain of the linear
amplifier to be slightly higher than what is required normally to a
scintillation detector.
The success of light detection also owes to
directly keeping the XRF source (AMC 2084,
U.K.) on the photomultiplier tube 9635QB
(PMT), Thorn EMI as shown above. The
probe consisting of this photomultiplier tube
and preamplifier was kept in a metal
container and tightly covered so as to be free
from any light leak.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page5
Padmanabha Rao MA
114 Charak Sadan, Vikas Puri, New Delhi 110018, India, E-mail: raomap@yahoo.com
Received 28 January; accepted 23 March; published online 01 April; printed 16 April 2013
1. LATEST DISCOVERIES IN NUCLEAR AND X-RAY PHYSICS, ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, AND
SOLAR PHYSICS
1.1. What is already known?
In 1896, Antoine Henri Becquerel discovered the phenomenon
of natural radioactivity from potassium uranyl sulfate salt. When
the salt was subjected to magnetic field, the radiation he
detected has negative, positive, and electrically neutral
charges. Marie Curie termed 'radioactivity' to the phenomenon
of these new emissions. Ernest Rutherford, who studied the
properties of radioactive decay named these three radiations as
alpha, beta, and gamma. While brilliant phosphorescence from
the chemical compound potassium uranyl sulfate is well
documented, fluorescent light emission from individual excited
atoms in artificially produced radioisotopes remained elusive to
previous researchers.
1.2. New Physics
Over a century later to the
discovery of radioactivity by Henri
Becquerel, the author has
discovered two generations of γ, β
and X-ray emissions, namely
Bharat Radiation followed by UV
dominant optical radiation from
within the one and the same
excited atom of a radioisotope or
XRF source by Padmanabha Rao
Effect, a previously unknown
phenomenon,
1.3. A surprise finding
led to these new
findings in Physics
Many of the discoveries in science
resulted from an unexpected finding. A surprise finding, Rb XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) showing
125,321 cps instead of the expected 4,400 Rb X-ray photon yield sec-1 0.5 steradian-1 triggered this
entire study just to unfold why these spectacularly high counts. In the absence of prior theory or any
experimental study on the subject, further experiments incredibly suggested the possibility of optical
radiation with low quantum yield from the source.
1.4. Why previous researchers failed to detect the optical emission?
There are further reasons why optical emission has evaded from previous researchers all these years. Firstly, the dominant UV not only invisible like
ionizing radiations but also follows the later from one and the same source. Secondly, photomultiplier tube simultaneously detects γ, β, and X-ray
emissions as well as UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions.
1.5. Three Experimental Discoveries
After 4 years of experimental research at the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan State in India , author suspected that optical radiation might be the
cause for excessively high counts from Rb XRF source, but unsure whether it was merely luminescence. Another two years were spent in developing two
elegant optical techniques using narrow band optical filters in one technique and a pair of sheet polarizers in another technique that greatly helped in
providing first and definite evidence on light emission and in estimating very low UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities despite the interfering ionizing
DISCOVERY • LETTERS • PHYSICS Discovery, Volume 4, Number 10, April 2013
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions
discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources
ISSN2278–5469EISSN2278–5450
Henri Becquerel Marie Curie Pierre Curie Ernest
Rutherford
The experimental set up is a simple Gamma ray Spectrometer
from Electronics Corporation of India, Hyderabad, India. The
successful detection of UV dominant optical radiation from
radioisotopes and XRF sources owes to setting gain of the linear
amplifier to be slightly higher than what is required normally to a
scintillation detector.
The success of light detection also owes to
directly keeping the XRF source (AMC 2084,
U.K.) on the photomultiplier tube 9635QB
(PMT), Thorn EMI as shown above. The
probe consisting of this photomultiplier tube
and preamplifier was kept in a metal
container and tightly covered so as to be free
from any light leak.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page5
Padmanabha Rao MA
114 Charak Sadan, Vikas Puri, New Delhi 110018, India, E-mail: raomap@yahoo.com
Received 28 January; accepted 23 March; published online 01 April; printed 16 April 2013
1. LATEST DISCOVERIES IN NUCLEAR AND X-RAY PHYSICS, ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, AND
SOLAR PHYSICS
1.1. What is already known?
In 1896, Antoine Henri Becquerel discovered the phenomenon
of natural radioactivity from potassium uranyl sulfate salt. When
the salt was subjected to magnetic field, the radiation he
detected has negative, positive, and electrically neutral
charges. Marie Curie termed 'radioactivity' to the phenomenon
of these new emissions. Ernest Rutherford, who studied the
properties of radioactive decay named these three radiations as
alpha, beta, and gamma. While brilliant phosphorescence from
the chemical compound potassium uranyl sulfate is well
documented, fluorescent light emission from individual excited
atoms in artificially produced radioisotopes remained elusive to
previous researchers.
1.2. New Physics
Over a century later to the
discovery of radioactivity by Henri
Becquerel, the author has
discovered two generations of γ, β
and X-ray emissions, namely
Bharat Radiation followed by UV
dominant optical radiation from
within the one and the same
excited atom of a radioisotope or
XRF source by Padmanabha Rao
Effect, a previously unknown
phenomenon,
1.3. A surprise finding
led to these new
findings in Physics
Many of the discoveries in science
resulted from an unexpected finding. A surprise finding, Rb XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) showing
125,321 cps instead of the expected 4,400 Rb X-ray photon yield sec-1 0.5 steradian-1 triggered this
entire study just to unfold why these spectacularly high counts. In the absence of prior theory or any
experimental study on the subject, further experiments incredibly suggested the possibility of optical
radiation with low quantum yield from the source.
1.4. Why previous researchers failed to detect the optical emission?
There are further reasons why optical emission has evaded from previous researchers all these years. Firstly, the dominant UV not only invisible like
ionizing radiations but also follows the later from one and the same source. Secondly, photomultiplier tube simultaneously detects γ, β, and X-ray
emissions as well as UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions.
1.5. Three Experimental Discoveries
After 4 years of experimental research at the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan State in India , author suspected that optical radiation might be the
cause for excessively high counts from Rb XRF source, but unsure whether it was merely luminescence. Another two years were spent in developing two
elegant optical techniques using narrow band optical filters in one technique and a pair of sheet polarizers in another technique that greatly helped in
providing first and definite evidence on light emission and in estimating very low UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities despite the interfering ionizing
DISCOVERY • LETTERS • PHYSICS Discovery, Volume 4, Number 10, April 2013
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions
discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources
ISSN2278–5469EISSN2278–5450
Henri Becquerel Marie Curie Pierre Curie Ernest
Rutherford
The experimental set up is a simple Gamma ray Spectrometer
from Electronics Corporation of India, Hyderabad, India. The
successful detection of UV dominant optical radiation from
radioisotopes and XRF sources owes to setting gain of the linear
amplifier to be slightly higher than what is required normally to a
scintillation detector.
The success of light detection also owes to
directly keeping the XRF source (AMC 2084,
U.K.) on the photomultiplier tube 9635QB
(PMT), Thorn EMI as shown above. The
probe consisting of this photomultiplier tube
and preamplifier was kept in a metal
container and tightly covered so as to be free
from any light leak.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page6
radiations. Essentially these techniques led to a key finding that γ, β, or X-ray emission commonly causes UV dominant optical
emission from the same excited atom in a radioisotope or XRF source. This experimental research led to three fundamental
discoveries significant to X-ray physics, nuclear physics and atomic spectroscopy.
2. Discovery 1: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION NEWLY DETECTED FROM
RADIOISOTOPES PRESENT AS RADIOCHEMICALS
Ever since the synthesis of new artificially produced radioisotopes by Irène Curie and Frédéric Joliot, optical emission was never
reported from radioisotopes by previous researchers.
2.1. New to Nuclear Physics
Radioisotopes are available either in the form of a salt called radiochemical or as a metal. For the first time, the author has
experimentally detected very weak UV dominant optical emission invisible to the naked eye from all the radiochemicals tested
such as 55
Fe, 113
Sn, 131
I, 137
Cs, and 90
Y with an exception of 3
H [1-9]. These radiochemicals have shown emission of an
unprecedented nature of optical spectrum, dominated by UV to the extent of 83 to 97% in gross light intensity, while this % UV depends upon γ-, X-ray, or
β energy. For example, low energy (0.02421 MeV) of dominant Indium X-rays of 113
Sn caused UV as high as 96.95%, while visible (VIS) and near infrared
(NIR) radiation intensities remained low at 2.21 % and 0.84% respectively [1]. Similarly, low energy γ of
241
Am has caused 98.03% (UV), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities remained low at 1.91% and
0.06% respectively. In contrast, high energy β from 90
Y caused just UV (83.36%), while VIS and NIR
radiation intensities rose correspondingly to 8.02% and 8.62% respectively. Optical emission from
radiochemicals has fundamental significance to nuclear physics, and simultaneous measurement of γ-,
X-ray, β and optical intensities help in more accurate estimation of tracers than ever before.
3. Discovery 2: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM XRF
SOURCES PRESENT AS SALTS
W.C. Roentgen has discovered X-rays from discharge tube in 1895. These X-rays known as
bremsstrahlung radiation or continuous X-rays are widely used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes.
However, light emission following X-rays from X-ray tubes remained elusive to previous researchers. In
the later years, C.G. Barkla has discovered characteristic X-rays of elements. These X-rays are called
XRF (X-ray fluorescence). Variable Energy X-ray Source (AMC 2084, U.K.) of the size of a lemon used
in the current study was manufactured with an intend to provide Rb, Ba and Tb X-rays with different
energies from Rb, Ba and Tb XRF sources present as Rb, Ba and Tb salts on incidence of intense gamma beam from 241
Am. The source also provides
Cu, Ag, and Mo X-rays with different energies from Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as Cu, Ag, and Mo metals. Light emission remained elusive to
previous researchers from any XRF source.
3.1. New to X-ray Physics
Characteristic X-rays (XRF) causing UV dominant optical emission by a
previously unknown atomic phenomenon is new to X-ray physics. Of all the
sources tested, the maximum UV dominant optical intensity has come from
Rb XRF source. The low 0.013336 MeV Rb X-ray energy could cause the
maximum UV (99.62%) intensity, while VIS (0.37% ), and NIR (0.01%)
radiation intensities remained very low in the gross light intensity. Likewise,
Ba X-rays from Ba XRF source, and Tb X-rays from Tb XRF source present
as Ba, and Tb salts respectively also showed the UV dominant optical
emission [1]. Since both X-ray tube and XRF source emit basically X-rays,
optical emission is expected even from X-ray tubes used in Hospitals for
diagnostic purposes. As both X-ray and optical spectra can now be
detected simultaneously, the data available opens up wide range of applications in future.
4. Discovery 3: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM METALS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE
WHEN PRESENT AS RADIOISOTOPES OR XRF SOURCES
UV emission from metal sources remained elusive to previous researchers until the current study. Therefore, unprecedented detection of UV dominant
optical emission from metals at room temperature could be a
revolutionary experimental finding in the history of science. Optical
emission was detected from cobalt metal when present as 57
Co
(AMC, U.K.); 60
Co useful in cancer treatment; and also from Cu, Mo,
and Ag metals present as Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources of AMC
2084,U.K. The optical radiation originating from metal sources hold
vital key that it should be atomic emission of light from excited atoms
in radioisotopes and XRF sources. Metal 57
Co spectrum detected
notably at room temperature pinpointed that the dominant γ-rays
might be causing atomic emission spectrum from within the same
excited 57
Co atom by a previously unknown phenomenon that led to
subatomic research.
The novel optical technique shown here (a) gives a glimpse how
the photomultiplier tube (9635QB Thorn EMI) has simultaneously
detected γ-rays, Fe X-rays and the successive and previously
unknown UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation
emissions from metal 57
Co unprecedented at room temperature. Use
of a pair of sheet polarizers helped in estimating the UV, VIS, and
NIR radiation intensities in gross light intensity by subtracting counts
between two successive steps [1]. Though metal is totally opaque to
light, yet light emission that was detected has come from surface of
the source. In order to explain these three experimental
breakthroughs, previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research
Irène Curie
Wilhelm Conrad
Röntgen
Charles Glover
Barkla
Two experimental discoveries in
physics could be made from
Variable Energy X-ray Source,
AMC 2084 (U.K.) shown on the left.
Along with X-rays, UV dominant
optical emission emerging through
the hole shown here was newly
detected from (1) Rb, Ba, and Tb
XRF sources present as salts, and
(2) Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources
present as metals.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page6
radiations. Essentially these techniques led to a key finding that γ, β, or X-ray emission commonly causes UV dominant optical
emission from the same excited atom in a radioisotope or XRF source. This experimental research led to three fundamental
discoveries significant to X-ray physics, nuclear physics and atomic spectroscopy.
2. Discovery 1: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION NEWLY DETECTED FROM
RADIOISOTOPES PRESENT AS RADIOCHEMICALS
Ever since the synthesis of new artificially produced radioisotopes by Irène Curie and Frédéric Joliot, optical emission was never
reported from radioisotopes by previous researchers.
2.1. New to Nuclear Physics
Radioisotopes are available either in the form of a salt called radiochemical or as a metal. For the first time, the author has
experimentally detected very weak UV dominant optical emission invisible to the naked eye from all the radiochemicals tested
such as 55
Fe, 113
Sn, 131
I, 137
Cs, and 90
Y with an exception of 3
H [1-9]. These radiochemicals have shown emission of an
unprecedented nature of optical spectrum, dominated by UV to the extent of 83 to 97% in gross light intensity, while this % UV depends upon γ-, X-ray, or
β energy. For example, low energy (0.02421 MeV) of dominant Indium X-rays of 113
Sn caused UV as high as 96.95%, while visible (VIS) and near infrared
(NIR) radiation intensities remained low at 2.21 % and 0.84% respectively [1]. Similarly, low energy γ of
241
Am has caused 98.03% (UV), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities remained low at 1.91% and
0.06% respectively. In contrast, high energy β from 90
Y caused just UV (83.36%), while VIS and NIR
radiation intensities rose correspondingly to 8.02% and 8.62% respectively. Optical emission from
radiochemicals has fundamental significance to nuclear physics, and simultaneous measurement of γ-,
X-ray, β and optical intensities help in more accurate estimation of tracers than ever before.
3. Discovery 2: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM XRF
SOURCES PRESENT AS SALTS
W.C. Roentgen has discovered X-rays from discharge tube in 1895. These X-rays known as
bremsstrahlung radiation or continuous X-rays are widely used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes.
However, light emission following X-rays from X-ray tubes remained elusive to previous researchers. In
the later years, C.G. Barkla has discovered characteristic X-rays of elements. These X-rays are called
XRF (X-ray fluorescence). Variable Energy X-ray Source (AMC 2084, U.K.) of the size of a lemon used
in the current study was manufactured with an intend to provide Rb, Ba and Tb X-rays with different
energies from Rb, Ba and Tb XRF sources present as Rb, Ba and Tb salts on incidence of intense gamma beam from 241
Am. The source also provides
Cu, Ag, and Mo X-rays with different energies from Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as Cu, Ag, and Mo metals. Light emission remained elusive to
previous researchers from any XRF source.
3.1. New to X-ray Physics
Characteristic X-rays (XRF) causing UV dominant optical emission by a
previously unknown atomic phenomenon is new to X-ray physics. Of all the
sources tested, the maximum UV dominant optical intensity has come from
Rb XRF source. The low 0.013336 MeV Rb X-ray energy could cause the
maximum UV (99.62%) intensity, while VIS (0.37% ), and NIR (0.01%)
radiation intensities remained very low in the gross light intensity. Likewise,
Ba X-rays from Ba XRF source, and Tb X-rays from Tb XRF source present
as Ba, and Tb salts respectively also showed the UV dominant optical
emission [1]. Since both X-ray tube and XRF source emit basically X-rays,
optical emission is expected even from X-ray tubes used in Hospitals for
diagnostic purposes. As both X-ray and optical spectra can now be
detected simultaneously, the data available opens up wide range of applications in future.
4. Discovery 3: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM METALS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE
WHEN PRESENT AS RADIOISOTOPES OR XRF SOURCES
UV emission from metal sources remained elusive to previous researchers until the current study. Therefore, unprecedented detection of UV dominant
optical emission from metals at room temperature could be a
revolutionary experimental finding in the history of science. Optical
emission was detected from cobalt metal when present as 57
Co
(AMC, U.K.); 60
Co useful in cancer treatment; and also from Cu, Mo,
and Ag metals present as Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources of AMC
2084,U.K. The optical radiation originating from metal sources hold
vital key that it should be atomic emission of light from excited atoms
in radioisotopes and XRF sources. Metal 57
Co spectrum detected
notably at room temperature pinpointed that the dominant γ-rays
might be causing atomic emission spectrum from within the same
excited 57
Co atom by a previously unknown phenomenon that led to
subatomic research.
The novel optical technique shown here (a) gives a glimpse how
the photomultiplier tube (9635QB Thorn EMI) has simultaneously
detected γ-rays, Fe X-rays and the successive and previously
unknown UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation
emissions from metal 57
Co unprecedented at room temperature. Use
of a pair of sheet polarizers helped in estimating the UV, VIS, and
NIR radiation intensities in gross light intensity by subtracting counts
between two successive steps [1]. Though metal is totally opaque to
light, yet light emission that was detected has come from surface of
the source. In order to explain these three experimental
breakthroughs, previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research
Irène Curie
Wilhelm Conrad
Röntgen
Charles Glover
Barkla
Two experimental discoveries in
physics could be made from
Variable Energy X-ray Source,
AMC 2084 (U.K.) shown on the left.
Along with X-rays, UV dominant
optical emission emerging through
the hole shown here was newly
detected from (1) Rb, Ba, and Tb
XRF sources present as salts, and
(2) Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources
present as metals.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page6
radiations. Essentially these techniques led to a key finding that γ, β, or X-ray emission commonly causes UV dominant optical
emission from the same excited atom in a radioisotope or XRF source. This experimental research led to three fundamental
discoveries significant to X-ray physics, nuclear physics and atomic spectroscopy.
2. Discovery 1: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION NEWLY DETECTED FROM
RADIOISOTOPES PRESENT AS RADIOCHEMICALS
Ever since the synthesis of new artificially produced radioisotopes by Irène Curie and Frédéric Joliot, optical emission was never
reported from radioisotopes by previous researchers.
2.1. New to Nuclear Physics
Radioisotopes are available either in the form of a salt called radiochemical or as a metal. For the first time, the author has
experimentally detected very weak UV dominant optical emission invisible to the naked eye from all the radiochemicals tested
such as 55
Fe, 113
Sn, 131
I, 137
Cs, and 90
Y with an exception of 3
H [1-9]. These radiochemicals have shown emission of an
unprecedented nature of optical spectrum, dominated by UV to the extent of 83 to 97% in gross light intensity, while this % UV depends upon γ-, X-ray, or
β energy. For example, low energy (0.02421 MeV) of dominant Indium X-rays of 113
Sn caused UV as high as 96.95%, while visible (VIS) and near infrared
(NIR) radiation intensities remained low at 2.21 % and 0.84% respectively [1]. Similarly, low energy γ of
241
Am has caused 98.03% (UV), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities remained low at 1.91% and
0.06% respectively. In contrast, high energy β from 90
Y caused just UV (83.36%), while VIS and NIR
radiation intensities rose correspondingly to 8.02% and 8.62% respectively. Optical emission from
radiochemicals has fundamental significance to nuclear physics, and simultaneous measurement of γ-,
X-ray, β and optical intensities help in more accurate estimation of tracers than ever before.
3. Discovery 2: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM XRF
SOURCES PRESENT AS SALTS
W.C. Roentgen has discovered X-rays from discharge tube in 1895. These X-rays known as
bremsstrahlung radiation or continuous X-rays are widely used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes.
However, light emission following X-rays from X-ray tubes remained elusive to previous researchers. In
the later years, C.G. Barkla has discovered characteristic X-rays of elements. These X-rays are called
XRF (X-ray fluorescence). Variable Energy X-ray Source (AMC 2084, U.K.) of the size of a lemon used
in the current study was manufactured with an intend to provide Rb, Ba and Tb X-rays with different
energies from Rb, Ba and Tb XRF sources present as Rb, Ba and Tb salts on incidence of intense gamma beam from 241
Am. The source also provides
Cu, Ag, and Mo X-rays with different energies from Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as Cu, Ag, and Mo metals. Light emission remained elusive to
previous researchers from any XRF source.
3.1. New to X-ray Physics
Characteristic X-rays (XRF) causing UV dominant optical emission by a
previously unknown atomic phenomenon is new to X-ray physics. Of all the
sources tested, the maximum UV dominant optical intensity has come from
Rb XRF source. The low 0.013336 MeV Rb X-ray energy could cause the
maximum UV (99.62%) intensity, while VIS (0.37% ), and NIR (0.01%)
radiation intensities remained very low in the gross light intensity. Likewise,
Ba X-rays from Ba XRF source, and Tb X-rays from Tb XRF source present
as Ba, and Tb salts respectively also showed the UV dominant optical
emission [1]. Since both X-ray tube and XRF source emit basically X-rays,
optical emission is expected even from X-ray tubes used in Hospitals for
diagnostic purposes. As both X-ray and optical spectra can now be
detected simultaneously, the data available opens up wide range of applications in future.
4. Discovery 3: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM METALS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE
WHEN PRESENT AS RADIOISOTOPES OR XRF SOURCES
UV emission from metal sources remained elusive to previous researchers until the current study. Therefore, unprecedented detection of UV dominant
optical emission from metals at room temperature could be a
revolutionary experimental finding in the history of science. Optical
emission was detected from cobalt metal when present as 57
Co
(AMC, U.K.); 60
Co useful in cancer treatment; and also from Cu, Mo,
and Ag metals present as Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources of AMC
2084,U.K. The optical radiation originating from metal sources hold
vital key that it should be atomic emission of light from excited atoms
in radioisotopes and XRF sources. Metal 57
Co spectrum detected
notably at room temperature pinpointed that the dominant γ-rays
might be causing atomic emission spectrum from within the same
excited 57
Co atom by a previously unknown phenomenon that led to
subatomic research.
The novel optical technique shown here (a) gives a glimpse how
the photomultiplier tube (9635QB Thorn EMI) has simultaneously
detected γ-rays, Fe X-rays and the successive and previously
unknown UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation
emissions from metal 57
Co unprecedented at room temperature. Use
of a pair of sheet polarizers helped in estimating the UV, VIS, and
NIR radiation intensities in gross light intensity by subtracting counts
between two successive steps [1]. Though metal is totally opaque to
light, yet light emission that was detected has come from surface of
the source. In order to explain these three experimental
breakthroughs, previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research
Irène Curie
Wilhelm Conrad
Röntgen
Charles Glover
Barkla
Two experimental discoveries in
physics could be made from
Variable Energy X-ray Source,
AMC 2084 (U.K.) shown on the left.
Along with X-rays, UV dominant
optical emission emerging through
the hole shown here was newly
detected from (1) Rb, Ba, and Tb
XRF sources present as salts, and
(2) Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources
present as metals.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page7
into excited atoms of radioisotopes and XRF sources led into a crop of three more fundamental physics discoveries.
5. Discovery 4: PREDICTED THE EXISTENCE OF BHARAT RADIATION
Ionizing radiation emissions causing
fluorescent light emission from within an
excited atom being new to nuclear
physics, X-ray physics and atomic
spectroscopy, the author has provided
the most plausible explanation. In the
first step towards this direction, a need
arose to address the limitation that the
ionizing radiations with keV or MeV
energies known to knock out valence
electron fail to do valence excitation to
optical levels. The author has thus made
an important postulate that within an
excited atom the ionizing radiations first
generate some exciting energy to be
slightly higher than that of the observed
UV at eV level, so that they do valence
excitation resulting into UV emission.
5.1. Electromagnetic
Spectrum redefined
It is well known that Rb salt emits Rb X-
ray spectrum when irradiated with an
intense gamma beam and emits the
basic atomic spectrum when heated to high temperatures, as exemplified on the left and right sides of the figure
below. When these two spectra are viewed together, a wavelength gap becomes evident in between the two.
For the first time the author has shown existence of a wavelength gap from 12.87 to 47.488 nm in
electromagnetic spectrum and also pinpointed the location of these predicted wavelengths in the gap.
5.2. Location of Bharat Radiation in E.M. Spectrum
In the case of Rb XRF source, the location of wavelengths from 12.87 to 47.488 nm
generated by Rb X-rays was predicted to be next to Rb X-ray wavelength range. And EUV
and UV dominant optical wavelengths to be immediately next to the 12.87 to 47.488 nm
range in electromagnetic spectrum. These wavelengths existing in between X-ray and
optical spectra of electromagnetic spectrum and do not belong to either X-rays or light
cannot be called either as X-rays or light, say from Rb XRF source. That is why these
wavelengths were termed as "Bharat Radiation", for convenience. The schematic
diagram shown here is the latest Rb XRF spectrum with two new emissions, Bharat and
optical wavelengths lying side by side. Bharat Radiation wavelengths produced by γ or β
from a radioisotope also would be situated within the same 12.87 to 47.488 nm. That
means the latest γ or β spectrum includes two new emissions Bharat and optical
wavelengths lying side by side. Though it was not possible to detect Bharat Radiation with
photomultiplier tube, the author has recently discovered Bharat Radiation wavelengths
from12.87 to 31 nm in solar spectra measured by various researchers since 1960s [12].
6. Discovery 5: A NEW CLASS OF ‘ROOM TEMPERATURE ATOMIC SPECTRA OF SOLID
RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES’ CAUSED BY BHARAT RADIATION
So far only one kind of atomic spectra is known in literature that can be caused by thermal excitation. However, the current study has unveiled a new
class of atomic spectra in the field of atomic spectroscopy exclusively from radioisotopes and XRF sources, since valence excitation takes place by Bharat
Radiation energy higher than thermal energy produced by γ, β or X-ray energy within the same excited atom. For these reasons, UV dominant atomic
spectra of ionizing radiation sources widely differed from basic atomic spectra. In these spectra UV would always be over 83% in the gross light intensity,
while VIS and NIR radiation intensities share the remaining 17%. Low γ, β or X-ray energy from sources such as Rb XRF source, 113
Sn, and 133
Ba could
emit UV with intensity above 95%, while the VIS and NIR radiations shared the rest 5%. Comparatively, high β energy from 90
Ycould hardly cause
83.36% UV intensity, while VIS and NIR intensities correspondingly rose to 8.02% and 8.62%. Difference in nature of spectrum is evident between Rb
XRF source and 86
Rb, and between 57
Co and 60
Co [1]. This is due to the fact that the nature of atomic spectrum of any source depends purely upon its
ionizing radiation energy regardless of atomic number Z, the type of radiation whether γ, β or X-ray, and nature of source medium whether salt or metal.
These spectra can be produced not only from radioisotopes, but also from salts or metals on bombarding with intense gamma beam from source
such as 241
Am, as happens with AMC 2084, U.K. Bharat and optical emissions now available, besides X-rays from a XRF source, and besides γ, and β
emissions from a radioisotope open up new frontiers for research and wide range of applications. Futuristic studies on the nature of atomic spectra of
radioisotopes and XRF sources provide a new understanding on the energy levels of excited atom.
6.1. New ‘atomic state of solids’
The question arises how
solids can emit atomic
spectra at room temperature.
Valence excitation by Bharat
radiation set the excited
atoms free from surrounding
unexcited atoms in ground
state. As the excited atoms in
radioisotopes and XRF
sources remain temporarily
Of all the sources tested, Rb XRF
source in AMC 2084, U.K. has
shown spectacularly high counts.
Just 4400 Rb X-ray pulses sec
_1
have caused Bharat Radiation, in
turn caused 125,321 counts per sec
due to UV dominant optical
emission within excited Rb atoms.
That means each X-ray has caused
28 light photons. Similarly, Ba X-
rays caused these two emissions in
Ba salt, and Cu X-rays did from
metal Cu in AMC 2084,U.K.
Beta energy (0.314 MeV) within an excited 60
Co atom in metal 60
Co
source first causes Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV
dominant optical emission. Likewise, the two γ-energies 1.17 and
1.33 MeV also cause two more generations: Bharat radiation,
followed by UV dominant optical emission.
Metal 57
Co source emits UV intensity as
high as 88.18% notably at room
temperature. Since excited
57
Co atoms
acted like free atoms, though surrounded
by stable Co atoms at ground state in metal
57
Co source, 0.1221 MeV γ-rays caused
Bharat Radiation in turn caused UV
dominant optical emission from excited
atoms shown in dark shade.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page7
into excited atoms of radioisotopes and XRF sources led into a crop of three more fundamental physics discoveries.
5. Discovery 4: PREDICTED THE EXISTENCE OF BHARAT RADIATION
Ionizing radiation emissions causing
fluorescent light emission from within an
excited atom being new to nuclear
physics, X-ray physics and atomic
spectroscopy, the author has provided
the most plausible explanation. In the
first step towards this direction, a need
arose to address the limitation that the
ionizing radiations with keV or MeV
energies known to knock out valence
electron fail to do valence excitation to
optical levels. The author has thus made
an important postulate that within an
excited atom the ionizing radiations first
generate some exciting energy to be
slightly higher than that of the observed
UV at eV level, so that they do valence
excitation resulting into UV emission.
5.1. Electromagnetic
Spectrum redefined
It is well known that Rb salt emits Rb X-
ray spectrum when irradiated with an
intense gamma beam and emits the
basic atomic spectrum when heated to high temperatures, as exemplified on the left and right sides of the figure
below. When these two spectra are viewed together, a wavelength gap becomes evident in between the two.
For the first time the author has shown existence of a wavelength gap from 12.87 to 47.488 nm in
electromagnetic spectrum and also pinpointed the location of these predicted wavelengths in the gap.
5.2. Location of Bharat Radiation in E.M. Spectrum
In the case of Rb XRF source, the location of wavelengths from 12.87 to 47.488 nm
generated by Rb X-rays was predicted to be next to Rb X-ray wavelength range. And EUV
and UV dominant optical wavelengths to be immediately next to the 12.87 to 47.488 nm
range in electromagnetic spectrum. These wavelengths existing in between X-ray and
optical spectra of electromagnetic spectrum and do not belong to either X-rays or light
cannot be called either as X-rays or light, say from Rb XRF source. That is why these
wavelengths were termed as "Bharat Radiation", for convenience. The schematic
diagram shown here is the latest Rb XRF spectrum with two new emissions, Bharat and
optical wavelengths lying side by side. Bharat Radiation wavelengths produced by γ or β
from a radioisotope also would be situated within the same 12.87 to 47.488 nm. That
means the latest γ or β spectrum includes two new emissions Bharat and optical
wavelengths lying side by side. Though it was not possible to detect Bharat Radiation with
photomultiplier tube, the author has recently discovered Bharat Radiation wavelengths
from12.87 to 31 nm in solar spectra measured by various researchers since 1960s [12].
6. Discovery 5: A NEW CLASS OF ‘ROOM TEMPERATURE ATOMIC SPECTRA OF SOLID
RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES’ CAUSED BY BHARAT RADIATION
So far only one kind of atomic spectra is known in literature that can be caused by thermal excitation. However, the current study has unveiled a new
class of atomic spectra in the field of atomic spectroscopy exclusively from radioisotopes and XRF sources, since valence excitation takes place by Bharat
Radiation energy higher than thermal energy produced by γ, β or X-ray energy within the same excited atom. For these reasons, UV dominant atomic
spectra of ionizing radiation sources widely differed from basic atomic spectra. In these spectra UV would always be over 83% in the gross light intensity,
while VIS and NIR radiation intensities share the remaining 17%. Low γ, β or X-ray energy from sources such as Rb XRF source, 113
Sn, and 133
Ba could
emit UV with intensity above 95%, while the VIS and NIR radiations shared the rest 5%. Comparatively, high β energy from 90
Ycould hardly cause
83.36% UV intensity, while VIS and NIR intensities correspondingly rose to 8.02% and 8.62%. Difference in nature of spectrum is evident between Rb
XRF source and 86
Rb, and between 57
Co and 60
Co [1]. This is due to the fact that the nature of atomic spectrum of any source depends purely upon its
ionizing radiation energy regardless of atomic number Z, the type of radiation whether γ, β or X-ray, and nature of source medium whether salt or metal.
These spectra can be produced not only from radioisotopes, but also from salts or metals on bombarding with intense gamma beam from source
such as 241
Am, as happens with AMC 2084, U.K. Bharat and optical emissions now available, besides X-rays from a XRF source, and besides γ, and β
emissions from a radioisotope open up new frontiers for research and wide range of applications. Futuristic studies on the nature of atomic spectra of
radioisotopes and XRF sources provide a new understanding on the energy levels of excited atom.
6.1. New ‘atomic state of solids’
The question arises how
solids can emit atomic
spectra at room temperature.
Valence excitation by Bharat
radiation set the excited
atoms free from surrounding
unexcited atoms in ground
state. As the excited atoms in
radioisotopes and XRF
sources remain temporarily
Of all the sources tested, Rb XRF
source in AMC 2084, U.K. has
shown spectacularly high counts.
Just 4400 Rb X-ray pulses sec
_1
have caused Bharat Radiation, in
turn caused 125,321 counts per sec
due to UV dominant optical
emission within excited Rb atoms.
That means each X-ray has caused
28 light photons. Similarly, Ba X-
rays caused these two emissions in
Ba salt, and Cu X-rays did from
metal Cu in AMC 2084,U.K.
Beta energy (0.314 MeV) within an excited 60
Co atom in metal 60
Co
source first causes Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV
dominant optical emission. Likewise, the two γ-energies 1.17 and
1.33 MeV also cause two more generations: Bharat radiation,
followed by UV dominant optical emission.
Metal 57
Co source emits UV intensity as
high as 88.18% notably at room
temperature. Since excited
57
Co atoms
acted like free atoms, though surrounded
by stable Co atoms at ground state in metal
57
Co source, 0.1221 MeV γ-rays caused
Bharat Radiation in turn caused UV
dominant optical emission from excited
atoms shown in dark shade.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page7
into excited atoms of radioisotopes and XRF sources led into a crop of three more fundamental physics discoveries.
5. Discovery 4: PREDICTED THE EXISTENCE OF BHARAT RADIATION
Ionizing radiation emissions causing
fluorescent light emission from within an
excited atom being new to nuclear
physics, X-ray physics and atomic
spectroscopy, the author has provided
the most plausible explanation. In the
first step towards this direction, a need
arose to address the limitation that the
ionizing radiations with keV or MeV
energies known to knock out valence
electron fail to do valence excitation to
optical levels. The author has thus made
an important postulate that within an
excited atom the ionizing radiations first
generate some exciting energy to be
slightly higher than that of the observed
UV at eV level, so that they do valence
excitation resulting into UV emission.
5.1. Electromagnetic
Spectrum redefined
It is well known that Rb salt emits Rb X-
ray spectrum when irradiated with an
intense gamma beam and emits the
basic atomic spectrum when heated to high temperatures, as exemplified on the left and right sides of the figure
below. When these two spectra are viewed together, a wavelength gap becomes evident in between the two.
For the first time the author has shown existence of a wavelength gap from 12.87 to 47.488 nm in
electromagnetic spectrum and also pinpointed the location of these predicted wavelengths in the gap.
5.2. Location of Bharat Radiation in E.M. Spectrum
In the case of Rb XRF source, the location of wavelengths from 12.87 to 47.488 nm
generated by Rb X-rays was predicted to be next to Rb X-ray wavelength range. And EUV
and UV dominant optical wavelengths to be immediately next to the 12.87 to 47.488 nm
range in electromagnetic spectrum. These wavelengths existing in between X-ray and
optical spectra of electromagnetic spectrum and do not belong to either X-rays or light
cannot be called either as X-rays or light, say from Rb XRF source. That is why these
wavelengths were termed as "Bharat Radiation", for convenience. The schematic
diagram shown here is the latest Rb XRF spectrum with two new emissions, Bharat and
optical wavelengths lying side by side. Bharat Radiation wavelengths produced by γ or β
from a radioisotope also would be situated within the same 12.87 to 47.488 nm. That
means the latest γ or β spectrum includes two new emissions Bharat and optical
wavelengths lying side by side. Though it was not possible to detect Bharat Radiation with
photomultiplier tube, the author has recently discovered Bharat Radiation wavelengths
from12.87 to 31 nm in solar spectra measured by various researchers since 1960s [12].
6. Discovery 5: A NEW CLASS OF ‘ROOM TEMPERATURE ATOMIC SPECTRA OF SOLID
RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES’ CAUSED BY BHARAT RADIATION
So far only one kind of atomic spectra is known in literature that can be caused by thermal excitation. However, the current study has unveiled a new
class of atomic spectra in the field of atomic spectroscopy exclusively from radioisotopes and XRF sources, since valence excitation takes place by Bharat
Radiation energy higher than thermal energy produced by γ, β or X-ray energy within the same excited atom. For these reasons, UV dominant atomic
spectra of ionizing radiation sources widely differed from basic atomic spectra. In these spectra UV would always be over 83% in the gross light intensity,
while VIS and NIR radiation intensities share the remaining 17%. Low γ, β or X-ray energy from sources such as Rb XRF source, 113
Sn, and 133
Ba could
emit UV with intensity above 95%, while the VIS and NIR radiations shared the rest 5%. Comparatively, high β energy from 90
Ycould hardly cause
83.36% UV intensity, while VIS and NIR intensities correspondingly rose to 8.02% and 8.62%. Difference in nature of spectrum is evident between Rb
XRF source and 86
Rb, and between 57
Co and 60
Co [1]. This is due to the fact that the nature of atomic spectrum of any source depends purely upon its
ionizing radiation energy regardless of atomic number Z, the type of radiation whether γ, β or X-ray, and nature of source medium whether salt or metal.
These spectra can be produced not only from radioisotopes, but also from salts or metals on bombarding with intense gamma beam from source
such as 241
Am, as happens with AMC 2084, U.K. Bharat and optical emissions now available, besides X-rays from a XRF source, and besides γ, and β
emissions from a radioisotope open up new frontiers for research and wide range of applications. Futuristic studies on the nature of atomic spectra of
radioisotopes and XRF sources provide a new understanding on the energy levels of excited atom.
6.1. New ‘atomic state of solids’
The question arises how
solids can emit atomic
spectra at room temperature.
Valence excitation by Bharat
radiation set the excited
atoms free from surrounding
unexcited atoms in ground
state. As the excited atoms in
radioisotopes and XRF
sources remain temporarily
Of all the sources tested, Rb XRF
source in AMC 2084, U.K. has
shown spectacularly high counts.
Just 4400 Rb X-ray pulses sec
_1
have caused Bharat Radiation, in
turn caused 125,321 counts per sec
due to UV dominant optical
emission within excited Rb atoms.
That means each X-ray has caused
28 light photons. Similarly, Ba X-
rays caused these two emissions in
Ba salt, and Cu X-rays did from
metal Cu in AMC 2084,U.K.
Beta energy (0.314 MeV) within an excited 60
Co atom in metal 60
Co
source first causes Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV
dominant optical emission. Likewise, the two γ-energies 1.17 and
1.33 MeV also cause two more generations: Bharat radiation,
followed by UV dominant optical emission.
Metal 57
Co source emits UV intensity as
high as 88.18% notably at room
temperature. Since excited
57
Co atoms
acted like free atoms, though surrounded
by stable Co atoms at ground state in metal
57
Co source, 0.1221 MeV γ-rays caused
Bharat Radiation in turn caused UV
dominant optical emission from excited
atoms shown in dark shade.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page8
as free atoms, the new ‘atomic state of solids’ that exists at room temperature itself is responsible for the typical spectra observed. Understandably,
environment of excited atoms in solid radioisotopes and XRF sources that cause UV dominant optical spectra differs much from that of thermally excited
atoms in gaseous phase causing the basic atomic spectra.
7. Discovery 6: NEW ATOMIC PHENOMENON (PADMANABHA RAO EFFECT)
The previously unknown atomic phenomenon reportedly taking place in radioisotopes and XRF sources explains how γ, β or X-ray successively
generates Bharat radiation (first generation), which in turn the UV dominant optical emission (second generation) within the same excited atom [1]. This
phenomenon is known as Padmanabha Rao Effect [5-7].
The phenomenon takes place in two stages.
(1) Ionizing radiation energy, particularly γ, β or X-ray energy at keV or MeV level loses energy just at eV level while passing through a core-
Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation (Bharat radiation) with the same energy at eV level but higher
than that of UV or EUV that the source emits.
(2) In turn, the Bharat energy generates UV dominant atomic spectrum on valence excitation.
.
Core- Coulomb interaction of γ, β or X-ray is the notable feature in this atomic phenomenon.
This phenomenon has certain distinct features that makes it entirely different from all other
phenomena known in literature. In Photo electric effect, a gamma or X-ray directly hits a core
electron and gives away all its energy to the electron so as to escape from the atom. In
Compton Effect, gamma or X-ray goes little away from a core electron, and shares only part
of its energy with the electron yet able to knock it out from the atom. As a result, both the
scattered gamma or X-ray and the Compton electron escape from the atom. In the current phenomenon, γ, β or X-ray passes through core Coulomb
space but more away from core electron than in the case of Compton Effect. As a result, γ, β or X-ray undergoes a very little loss of energy at eV level
while passing through core Coulomb space, so that the core electron gets unaffected. As explained already, the loss of energy is released as an
electromagnetic radiation termed Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Therefore, γ, β or X-ray
with a very little loss of energy at eV level is successively followed by two more emissions namely the Bharat Radiation with eV energy and UV dominant
optical radiation from one and the same excited atom. Two years were lasted in conceiving this phenomenon. This is how scientific discoveries take years
of hard work, when the researcher remains uncertain how long it takes to resolve a puzzling issue.
7.1. Tritium is a source of Bharat Radiation
The fact that 3
H (Tritium) did not show any optical emission validates the atomic phenomenon [1]. The reason being 3
H has only one electron, which is in
K-shell. Passage of β-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. It is to note that Padmanabha Rao Effect causes UV dominant
optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources having at least two filled orbits. However, tritium has only filled orbit. In the absence of an electron in
L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3
H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Unlike all other radioisotopes tested, 3
H
proved to be an ideal source of Bharat radiation in the absence of any optical emission. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly
ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission.
8. Bharat Radiation and UV cause skin dose to Hospital patients exposed to X-rays or gamma rays
The current study suggests that the radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation
dose to patients. Since Bharat Radiation and UV follow X-rays according to the current study, Bharat Radiation and UV from diagnostic X-ray tubes and
CT scanners may subject the patients to higher skin dose than previously thought [10]. Bharat Radiation, UV emission following γ-rays from metal 60
Co
may also contribute for the skin erythema noticed in cancer patients during 60
Co Teletherapy treatment [11]. By introducing a very thin Aluminum sheet or
some other thick material between X-ray or gamma source and the patient helps in cutting off these radiations and thus the extra skin dose.
REFERENCES
1. Padmanabha Rao MA, UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Braz. J. Phy., 40, no 1, 38-46, 2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332010000100007
2. Padmanabha Rao MA. Atomic emission of light from sources of ionizing radiation by a new phenomenon, Technical Report No: DLJ/ IL/ 97/ 7 of the Defence
Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India) Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India), 1997,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/technicalreport.html
3. Padmanabha Rao MA. Light emission observed from ionizing radiation sources by an atomic phenomenon, National Symposium on Contemporary Physics,
November 6-8, 1997, Kolkata, India, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/kolkata.html
4. Padmanabha Rao MA. Radioisotopes and X-ray sources emit fluorescent light by an atomic phenomenon, Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on
Radiation Physics, (Eds. P K Bhatnagar et al), Jodhpur 342011, India, pp 273-276, 1998 http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/jodhpur1998.html
The schematic diagram explains how 0.1221 MeV γ- ray
in excited
57
Co atom of metal
57
Co source generates
Bharat Radiation while passing through core Coulomb
space, which in turn generates UV dominant optical
emission on valence excitation by Padmanabha Rao
Effect [1].
UV dominant optical
emission takes place from
a salt such as Rubidium
salt, when an incident γ or
X-ray knocks away a K
shell electron in Rb atom
by photo electric effect.
The resulting K X-ray, and
L X-ray can generate
Bharat Radiation photons
while passing through
Coulomb space of M shell
electrons. Next, the
Bharat Radiation photons
generate UV dominant
optical emission on
valence excitation.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page8
as free atoms, the new ‘atomic state of solids’ that exists at room temperature itself is responsible for the typical spectra observed. Understandably,
environment of excited atoms in solid radioisotopes and XRF sources that cause UV dominant optical spectra differs much from that of thermally excited
atoms in gaseous phase causing the basic atomic spectra.
7. Discovery 6: NEW ATOMIC PHENOMENON (PADMANABHA RAO EFFECT)
The previously unknown atomic phenomenon reportedly taking place in radioisotopes and XRF sources explains how γ, β or X-ray successively
generates Bharat radiation (first generation), which in turn the UV dominant optical emission (second generation) within the same excited atom [1]. This
phenomenon is known as Padmanabha Rao Effect [5-7].
The phenomenon takes place in two stages.
(1) Ionizing radiation energy, particularly γ, β or X-ray energy at keV or MeV level loses energy just at eV level while passing through a core-
Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation (Bharat radiation) with the same energy at eV level but higher
than that of UV or EUV that the source emits.
(2) In turn, the Bharat energy generates UV dominant atomic spectrum on valence excitation.
.
Core- Coulomb interaction of γ, β or X-ray is the notable feature in this atomic phenomenon.
This phenomenon has certain distinct features that makes it entirely different from all other
phenomena known in literature. In Photo electric effect, a gamma or X-ray directly hits a core
electron and gives away all its energy to the electron so as to escape from the atom. In
Compton Effect, gamma or X-ray goes little away from a core electron, and shares only part
of its energy with the electron yet able to knock it out from the atom. As a result, both the
scattered gamma or X-ray and the Compton electron escape from the atom. In the current phenomenon, γ, β or X-ray passes through core Coulomb
space but more away from core electron than in the case of Compton Effect. As a result, γ, β or X-ray undergoes a very little loss of energy at eV level
while passing through core Coulomb space, so that the core electron gets unaffected. As explained already, the loss of energy is released as an
electromagnetic radiation termed Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Therefore, γ, β or X-ray
with a very little loss of energy at eV level is successively followed by two more emissions namely the Bharat Radiation with eV energy and UV dominant
optical radiation from one and the same excited atom. Two years were lasted in conceiving this phenomenon. This is how scientific discoveries take years
of hard work, when the researcher remains uncertain how long it takes to resolve a puzzling issue.
7.1. Tritium is a source of Bharat Radiation
The fact that 3
H (Tritium) did not show any optical emission validates the atomic phenomenon [1]. The reason being 3
H has only one electron, which is in
K-shell. Passage of β-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. It is to note that Padmanabha Rao Effect causes UV dominant
optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources having at least two filled orbits. However, tritium has only filled orbit. In the absence of an electron in
L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3
H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Unlike all other radioisotopes tested, 3
H
proved to be an ideal source of Bharat radiation in the absence of any optical emission. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly
ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission.
8. Bharat Radiation and UV cause skin dose to Hospital patients exposed to X-rays or gamma rays
The current study suggests that the radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation
dose to patients. Since Bharat Radiation and UV follow X-rays according to the current study, Bharat Radiation and UV from diagnostic X-ray tubes and
CT scanners may subject the patients to higher skin dose than previously thought [10]. Bharat Radiation, UV emission following γ-rays from metal 60
Co
may also contribute for the skin erythema noticed in cancer patients during 60
Co Teletherapy treatment [11]. By introducing a very thin Aluminum sheet or
some other thick material between X-ray or gamma source and the patient helps in cutting off these radiations and thus the extra skin dose.
REFERENCES
1. Padmanabha Rao MA, UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Braz. J. Phy., 40, no 1, 38-46, 2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332010000100007
2. Padmanabha Rao MA. Atomic emission of light from sources of ionizing radiation by a new phenomenon, Technical Report No: DLJ/ IL/ 97/ 7 of the Defence
Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India) Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India), 1997,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/technicalreport.html
3. Padmanabha Rao MA. Light emission observed from ionizing radiation sources by an atomic phenomenon, National Symposium on Contemporary Physics,
November 6-8, 1997, Kolkata, India, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/kolkata.html
4. Padmanabha Rao MA. Radioisotopes and X-ray sources emit fluorescent light by an atomic phenomenon, Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on
Radiation Physics, (Eds. P K Bhatnagar et al), Jodhpur 342011, India, pp 273-276, 1998 http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/jodhpur1998.html
The schematic diagram explains how 0.1221 MeV γ- ray
in excited
57
Co atom of metal
57
Co source generates
Bharat Radiation while passing through core Coulomb
space, which in turn generates UV dominant optical
emission on valence excitation by Padmanabha Rao
Effect [1].
UV dominant optical
emission takes place from
a salt such as Rubidium
salt, when an incident γ or
X-ray knocks away a K
shell electron in Rb atom
by photo electric effect.
The resulting K X-ray, and
L X-ray can generate
Bharat Radiation photons
while passing through
Coulomb space of M shell
electrons. Next, the
Bharat Radiation photons
generate UV dominant
optical emission on
valence excitation.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page8
as free atoms, the new ‘atomic state of solids’ that exists at room temperature itself is responsible for the typical spectra observed. Understandably,
environment of excited atoms in solid radioisotopes and XRF sources that cause UV dominant optical spectra differs much from that of thermally excited
atoms in gaseous phase causing the basic atomic spectra.
7. Discovery 6: NEW ATOMIC PHENOMENON (PADMANABHA RAO EFFECT)
The previously unknown atomic phenomenon reportedly taking place in radioisotopes and XRF sources explains how γ, β or X-ray successively
generates Bharat radiation (first generation), which in turn the UV dominant optical emission (second generation) within the same excited atom [1]. This
phenomenon is known as Padmanabha Rao Effect [5-7].
The phenomenon takes place in two stages.
(1) Ionizing radiation energy, particularly γ, β or X-ray energy at keV or MeV level loses energy just at eV level while passing through a core-
Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation (Bharat radiation) with the same energy at eV level but higher
than that of UV or EUV that the source emits.
(2) In turn, the Bharat energy generates UV dominant atomic spectrum on valence excitation.
.
Core- Coulomb interaction of γ, β or X-ray is the notable feature in this atomic phenomenon.
This phenomenon has certain distinct features that makes it entirely different from all other
phenomena known in literature. In Photo electric effect, a gamma or X-ray directly hits a core
electron and gives away all its energy to the electron so as to escape from the atom. In
Compton Effect, gamma or X-ray goes little away from a core electron, and shares only part
of its energy with the electron yet able to knock it out from the atom. As a result, both the
scattered gamma or X-ray and the Compton electron escape from the atom. In the current phenomenon, γ, β or X-ray passes through core Coulomb
space but more away from core electron than in the case of Compton Effect. As a result, γ, β or X-ray undergoes a very little loss of energy at eV level
while passing through core Coulomb space, so that the core electron gets unaffected. As explained already, the loss of energy is released as an
electromagnetic radiation termed Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Therefore, γ, β or X-ray
with a very little loss of energy at eV level is successively followed by two more emissions namely the Bharat Radiation with eV energy and UV dominant
optical radiation from one and the same excited atom. Two years were lasted in conceiving this phenomenon. This is how scientific discoveries take years
of hard work, when the researcher remains uncertain how long it takes to resolve a puzzling issue.
7.1. Tritium is a source of Bharat Radiation
The fact that 3
H (Tritium) did not show any optical emission validates the atomic phenomenon [1]. The reason being 3
H has only one electron, which is in
K-shell. Passage of β-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. It is to note that Padmanabha Rao Effect causes UV dominant
optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources having at least two filled orbits. However, tritium has only filled orbit. In the absence of an electron in
L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3
H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Unlike all other radioisotopes tested, 3
H
proved to be an ideal source of Bharat radiation in the absence of any optical emission. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly
ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission.
8. Bharat Radiation and UV cause skin dose to Hospital patients exposed to X-rays or gamma rays
The current study suggests that the radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation
dose to patients. Since Bharat Radiation and UV follow X-rays according to the current study, Bharat Radiation and UV from diagnostic X-ray tubes and
CT scanners may subject the patients to higher skin dose than previously thought [10]. Bharat Radiation, UV emission following γ-rays from metal 60
Co
may also contribute for the skin erythema noticed in cancer patients during 60
Co Teletherapy treatment [11]. By introducing a very thin Aluminum sheet or
some other thick material between X-ray or gamma source and the patient helps in cutting off these radiations and thus the extra skin dose.
REFERENCES
1. Padmanabha Rao MA, UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Braz. J. Phy., 40, no 1, 38-46, 2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332010000100007
2. Padmanabha Rao MA. Atomic emission of light from sources of ionizing radiation by a new phenomenon, Technical Report No: DLJ/ IL/ 97/ 7 of the Defence
Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India) Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India), 1997,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/technicalreport.html
3. Padmanabha Rao MA. Light emission observed from ionizing radiation sources by an atomic phenomenon, National Symposium on Contemporary Physics,
November 6-8, 1997, Kolkata, India, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/kolkata.html
4. Padmanabha Rao MA. Radioisotopes and X-ray sources emit fluorescent light by an atomic phenomenon, Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on
Radiation Physics, (Eds. P K Bhatnagar et al), Jodhpur 342011, India, pp 273-276, 1998 http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/jodhpur1998.html
The schematic diagram explains how 0.1221 MeV γ- ray
in excited
57
Co atom of metal
57
Co source generates
Bharat Radiation while passing through core Coulomb
space, which in turn generates UV dominant optical
emission on valence excitation by Padmanabha Rao
Effect [1].
UV dominant optical
emission takes place from
a salt such as Rubidium
salt, when an incident γ or
X-ray knocks away a K
shell electron in Rb atom
by photo electric effect.
The resulting K X-ray, and
L X-ray can generate
Bharat Radiation photons
while passing through
Coulomb space of M shell
electrons. Next, the
Bharat Radiation photons
generate UV dominant
optical emission on
valence excitation.
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page9
5. Padmanabha Rao MA. X-ray source emits not only X-rays but also low energy electromagnetic radiation. Presented in 1998 Symposium on Radiation
Measurements and Applications, Ninth in a series, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. Abstract 3PW26, 1998,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/michigan1998.html
6. Padmanabha Rao MA. Possible biological effects by UV radiation newly detected from internally administered radioisotopes. in Proceedings of the Symposium
on Low Level Electromagnetic Phenomena in Biological Systems (BIOSYS-’99), edited by Jitendra Behari p.68. 1999,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/uvdosimetry.html
7. Padmanabha Rao MA, Discovery of light emission from XRF sources, Presented in 50th Annual Denver Conference, Steamboat Springs, Colorado State,
U.S.A., Abstract F-01, p.124, 2001,. http://www.dxcicdd.com/01/pdf/F-01.pdf
8. Padmanabha Rao MA. Room temperature atomic spectra from solid radioisotopes and XRF sources, Presented in 34 Conference of European Group for Atomic
Spectroscopy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Editor: K.Blagoev, Institute of Sold State Physics, Oral Paper F2-4, p.103, 2002, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/egas34.html
9. Padmanabha Rao MA, (Invited Paper) Solar X-rays, gamma rays and electrons cause EUV by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon, in Proceedings of the
7th International Conference on Human Ecology and Nature (HEN2008), Moscow-Ples, Russia, edited by Vladimir V.Zaitsev (Moscow Scientific and industrial
Association “Radon”) p.45, 2008. http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/Solarfission.html
10. Radiation risks of CT scans need to be taught to patients. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/radiation-risks-ct-scans-taught-patients.html
11. Cobalt- 60 more unsafe than thought. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/COBALT-+60+MORE+UNSAFE+THAN+THOUGHT.-a0228856095
12. Padmanabha Rao MA, .Discovery of Sun’s Bharat Radiation emission causing Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) and UV dominant optical radiation, IOSR Journal of
Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP), e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 3, Issue 2, PP 56-60, Mar. - Apr. 2013,
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/papers/Vol3-issue2/H0325660.pdf
13. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1903, Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Marie Curie: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1903/becquerel-bio.html
14. The Discovery of Radioactivity: http://www.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/4.html
15. Photos of Nobel Laureates are taken from Internet such as : http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/curie/
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page9
5. Padmanabha Rao MA. X-ray source emits not only X-rays but also low energy electromagnetic radiation. Presented in 1998 Symposium on Radiation
Measurements and Applications, Ninth in a series, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. Abstract 3PW26, 1998,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/michigan1998.html
6. Padmanabha Rao MA. Possible biological effects by UV radiation newly detected from internally administered radioisotopes. in Proceedings of the Symposium
on Low Level Electromagnetic Phenomena in Biological Systems (BIOSYS-’99), edited by Jitendra Behari p.68. 1999,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/uvdosimetry.html
7. Padmanabha Rao MA, Discovery of light emission from XRF sources, Presented in 50th Annual Denver Conference, Steamboat Springs, Colorado State,
U.S.A., Abstract F-01, p.124, 2001,. http://www.dxcicdd.com/01/pdf/F-01.pdf
8. Padmanabha Rao MA. Room temperature atomic spectra from solid radioisotopes and XRF sources, Presented in 34 Conference of European Group for Atomic
Spectroscopy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Editor: K.Blagoev, Institute of Sold State Physics, Oral Paper F2-4, p.103, 2002, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/egas34.html
9. Padmanabha Rao MA, (Invited Paper) Solar X-rays, gamma rays and electrons cause EUV by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon, in Proceedings of the
7th International Conference on Human Ecology and Nature (HEN2008), Moscow-Ples, Russia, edited by Vladimir V.Zaitsev (Moscow Scientific and industrial
Association “Radon”) p.45, 2008. http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/Solarfission.html
10. Radiation risks of CT scans need to be taught to patients. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/radiation-risks-ct-scans-taught-patients.html
11. Cobalt- 60 more unsafe than thought. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/COBALT-+60+MORE+UNSAFE+THAN+THOUGHT.-a0228856095
12. Padmanabha Rao MA, .Discovery of Sun’s Bharat Radiation emission causing Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) and UV dominant optical radiation, IOSR Journal of
Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP), e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 3, Issue 2, PP 56-60, Mar. - Apr. 2013,
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/papers/Vol3-issue2/H0325660.pdf
13. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1903, Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Marie Curie: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1903/becquerel-bio.html
14. The Discovery of Radioactivity: http://www.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/4.html
15. Photos of Nobel Laureates are taken from Internet such as : http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/curie/
Discovery • Letters • Physics
Padmanabha Rao,
Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources,
Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in
http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved
Page9
5. Padmanabha Rao MA. X-ray source emits not only X-rays but also low energy electromagnetic radiation. Presented in 1998 Symposium on Radiation
Measurements and Applications, Ninth in a series, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. Abstract 3PW26, 1998,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/michigan1998.html
6. Padmanabha Rao MA. Possible biological effects by UV radiation newly detected from internally administered radioisotopes. in Proceedings of the Symposium
on Low Level Electromagnetic Phenomena in Biological Systems (BIOSYS-’99), edited by Jitendra Behari p.68. 1999,
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/uvdosimetry.html
7. Padmanabha Rao MA, Discovery of light emission from XRF sources, Presented in 50th Annual Denver Conference, Steamboat Springs, Colorado State,
U.S.A., Abstract F-01, p.124, 2001,. http://www.dxcicdd.com/01/pdf/F-01.pdf
8. Padmanabha Rao MA. Room temperature atomic spectra from solid radioisotopes and XRF sources, Presented in 34 Conference of European Group for Atomic
Spectroscopy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Editor: K.Blagoev, Institute of Sold State Physics, Oral Paper F2-4, p.103, 2002, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/egas34.html
9. Padmanabha Rao MA, (Invited Paper) Solar X-rays, gamma rays and electrons cause EUV by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon, in Proceedings of the
7th International Conference on Human Ecology and Nature (HEN2008), Moscow-Ples, Russia, edited by Vladimir V.Zaitsev (Moscow Scientific and industrial
Association “Radon”) p.45, 2008. http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/Solarfission.html
10. Radiation risks of CT scans need to be taught to patients. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/radiation-risks-ct-scans-taught-patients.html
11. Cobalt- 60 more unsafe than thought. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/COBALT-+60+MORE+UNSAFE+THAN+THOUGHT.-a0228856095
12. Padmanabha Rao MA, .Discovery of Sun’s Bharat Radiation emission causing Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) and UV dominant optical radiation, IOSR Journal of
Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP), e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 3, Issue 2, PP 56-60, Mar. - Apr. 2013,
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/papers/Vol3-issue2/H0325660.pdf
13. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1903, Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Marie Curie: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1903/becquerel-bio.html
14. The Discovery of Radioactivity: http://www.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/4.html
15. Photos of Nobel Laureates are taken from Internet such as : http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/curie/

More Related Content

What's hot

Discovery of IR
Discovery of IRDiscovery of IR
Discovery of IR
JinalPrajapati13
 
Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...
Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...
Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...Sérgio Sacani
 
X ray diff lecture 3
X ray diff lecture 3X ray diff lecture 3
X ray diff lecture 3
FREE EDUCATION FOR ALL
 
History and Current Status of Strontium Iodide Scintillators
History and Current Status of Strontium Iodide ScintillatorsHistory and Current Status of Strontium Iodide Scintillators
History and Current Status of Strontium Iodide Scintillators
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
 
H0325660
H0325660H0325660
H0325660
IOSR Journals
 
Radiation sources
Radiation sourcesRadiation sources
Radiation sources
SAlonii Chawla
 
Analysis ppt xrd
Analysis ppt xrdAnalysis ppt xrd
Analysis ppt xrd
pooja joshi
 
XRD
XRDXRD
Application_note
Application_noteApplication_note
Application_noteAnton Walsh
 
Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;
Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;
Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;
Brian Walsh
 
Lanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared Materials
Lanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared MaterialsLanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared Materials
Lanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared Materials
Brian Walsh
 
Review of Tm and Ho Materials;
Review of Tm and Ho Materials;Review of Tm and Ho Materials;
Review of Tm and Ho Materials;
Brian Walsh
 
sources of radiation
sources of radiationsources of radiation
sources of radiation
Umar Tauqir
 
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
GGS Medical College/Baba Farid Univ.of Health Sciences.
 

What's hot (16)

Discovery of IR
Discovery of IRDiscovery of IR
Discovery of IR
 
Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...
Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...
Dusty starburst galaxies_in_the_early_universe_as_revealed_by_gravitational_l...
 
Xrd
XrdXrd
Xrd
 
X ray diff lecture 3
X ray diff lecture 3X ray diff lecture 3
X ray diff lecture 3
 
History and Current Status of Strontium Iodide Scintillators
History and Current Status of Strontium Iodide ScintillatorsHistory and Current Status of Strontium Iodide Scintillators
History and Current Status of Strontium Iodide Scintillators
 
H0325660
H0325660H0325660
H0325660
 
Radiation sources
Radiation sourcesRadiation sources
Radiation sources
 
Analysis ppt xrd
Analysis ppt xrdAnalysis ppt xrd
Analysis ppt xrd
 
XRD
XRDXRD
XRD
 
Application_note
Application_noteApplication_note
Application_note
 
Nuclear radiation
Nuclear radiationNuclear radiation
Nuclear radiation
 
Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;
Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;
Nonstoichiometric Laser Materials;
 
Lanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared Materials
Lanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared MaterialsLanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared Materials
Lanthanide-Doped Mid-Infrared Materials
 
Review of Tm and Ho Materials;
Review of Tm and Ho Materials;Review of Tm and Ho Materials;
Review of Tm and Ho Materials;
 
sources of radiation
sources of radiationsources of radiation
sources of radiation
 
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
 

Viewers also liked

Laura sofia montenegro puerto
Laura sofia montenegro puertoLaura sofia montenegro puerto
Laura sofia montenegro puertolaura307
 
Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01
Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01
Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01
mahmud .
 
10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - Appirio
10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - Appirio10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - Appirio
10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - AppirioMark Longstaff
 
Best solution to rip dvd turbo to other formats
Best solution to rip dvd turbo to other formatsBest solution to rip dvd turbo to other formats
Best solution to rip dvd turbo to other formatsHappyman123
 
Presentación1
Presentación1Presentación1
Presentación1laura307
 
Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0
Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0
Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0
Elida Lopez
 
Growing your business managing cost, funding, customer satisfaction - final
Growing your business  managing  cost, funding, customer satisfaction - finalGrowing your business  managing  cost, funding, customer satisfaction - final
Growing your business managing cost, funding, customer satisfaction - finalMike Smay
 
52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl
52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl
52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl
Bokkul Ful
 
Las Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil Apps
Las Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil AppsLas Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil Apps
Las Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil Apps
Hector Jayat
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Laura sofia montenegro puerto
Laura sofia montenegro puertoLaura sofia montenegro puerto
Laura sofia montenegro puerto
 
PROPOSAL REU
PROPOSAL REUPROPOSAL REU
PROPOSAL REU
 
Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01
Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01
Perubahandanpengembanganorganisasi 150411234505-conversion-gate01
 
10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - Appirio
10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - Appirio10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - Appirio
10 Questions on Crowdsourcing for Enterprise IT - Appirio
 
Souvenirs
SouvenirsSouvenirs
Souvenirs
 
Best solution to rip dvd turbo to other formats
Best solution to rip dvd turbo to other formatsBest solution to rip dvd turbo to other formats
Best solution to rip dvd turbo to other formats
 
Presentación1
Presentación1Presentación1
Presentación1
 
Tmf i 021013
Tmf i   021013Tmf i   021013
Tmf i 021013
 
Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0
Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0
Comparación entre la web 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0
 
Growing your business managing cost, funding, customer satisfaction - final
Growing your business  managing  cost, funding, customer satisfaction - finalGrowing your business  managing  cost, funding, customer satisfaction - final
Growing your business managing cost, funding, customer satisfaction - final
 
52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl
52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl
52465009 compensation-system-of-dbl-amp-ucbl
 
Report to HUMPUSS
Report to HUMPUSSReport to HUMPUSS
Report to HUMPUSS
 
2556 10-16 (m1-m)p
2556 10-16 (m1-m)p2556 10-16 (m1-m)p
2556 10-16 (m1-m)p
 
Senarai semak kgsk gg
Senarai semak kgsk ggSenarai semak kgsk gg
Senarai semak kgsk gg
 
Las Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil Apps
Las Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil AppsLas Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil Apps
Las Top 10 Preguntas y Respuestas Sobre Móvil Apps
 

Similar to Research Paper 2: This paper should be read after reading Brazilian Jour.Phy, March 2010

Spectrophotometry in life science.pptx
Spectrophotometry in life science.pptxSpectrophotometry in life science.pptx
Spectrophotometry in life science.pptx
Rahil Razak
 
cosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdf
cosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdfcosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdf
cosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdf
Medwin Publishers
 
Radioisotopes
RadioisotopesRadioisotopes
Radioisotopes
kallapavan
 
Radiation pollution
Radiation pollutionRadiation pollution
Radiation pollution
Rahul Kamble
 
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
IOSR Journals
 
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
IOSR Journals
 
GROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by team
GROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by teamGROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by team
GROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by team
jubileebasubas2
 
HISTORY OF RADIOLOGY ppt.pptx
HISTORY OF RADIOLOGY  ppt.pptxHISTORY OF RADIOLOGY  ppt.pptx
HISTORY OF RADIOLOGY ppt.pptx
nisha dua
 
Nuclear Radiation.pptx
Nuclear Radiation.pptxNuclear Radiation.pptx
Nuclear Radiation.pptx
ShahZaib317626
 
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...Sérgio Sacani
 
TOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATION
TOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATIONTOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATION
TOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATION
Nik Noor Ashikin Nik Ab Razak
 
Infrared
InfraredInfrared
The Birth Of Nuclear Medicine
The Birth Of Nuclear MedicineThe Birth Of Nuclear Medicine
The Birth Of Nuclear Medicine
Ashley Davis
 
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxiesSubmillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxiesSérgio Sacani
 
Radiopharmaceu.pdf
Radiopharmaceu.pdfRadiopharmaceu.pdf
Radiopharmaceu.pdf
SonuYadav322737
 
A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634
A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634
A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634Sérgio Sacani
 
Nuclear Medicine
Nuclear MedicineNuclear Medicine
Nuclear Medicine
Sajad Buch
 
Photoelectric effect and experimental setup
Photoelectric effect and experimental setupPhotoelectric effect and experimental setup
Photoelectric effect and experimental setup
Omkar Rane
 
Radio array starts_works
Radio array starts_worksRadio array starts_works
Radio array starts_worksSérgio Sacani
 

Similar to Research Paper 2: This paper should be read after reading Brazilian Jour.Phy, March 2010 (20)

Spectrophotometry in life science.pptx
Spectrophotometry in life science.pptxSpectrophotometry in life science.pptx
Spectrophotometry in life science.pptx
 
cosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdf
cosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdfcosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdf
cosmic-baby-and-the-mystery-of-fast-radio-bursts.pdf
 
Radioisotopes
RadioisotopesRadioisotopes
Radioisotopes
 
Radiation pollution
Radiation pollutionRadiation pollution
Radiation pollution
 
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
 
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
Discovery of superluminal velocities of X-rays and Bharat Radiation challengi...
 
GROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by team
GROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by teamGROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by team
GROUP -1(Study of Radioactivity) by team
 
HISTORY OF RADIOLOGY ppt.pptx
HISTORY OF RADIOLOGY  ppt.pptxHISTORY OF RADIOLOGY  ppt.pptx
HISTORY OF RADIOLOGY ppt.pptx
 
Nuclear Radiation.pptx
Nuclear Radiation.pptxNuclear Radiation.pptx
Nuclear Radiation.pptx
 
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
 
TOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATION
TOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATIONTOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATION
TOPIC 1: HISTORY OF RADIATION
 
Infrared
InfraredInfrared
Infrared
 
The Birth Of Nuclear Medicine
The Birth Of Nuclear MedicineThe Birth Of Nuclear Medicine
The Birth Of Nuclear Medicine
 
Radioactivity
RadioactivityRadioactivity
Radioactivity
 
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxiesSubmillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
 
Radiopharmaceu.pdf
Radiopharmaceu.pdfRadiopharmaceu.pdf
Radiopharmaceu.pdf
 
A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634
A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634
A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634
 
Nuclear Medicine
Nuclear MedicineNuclear Medicine
Nuclear Medicine
 
Photoelectric effect and experimental setup
Photoelectric effect and experimental setupPhotoelectric effect and experimental setup
Photoelectric effect and experimental setup
 
Radio array starts_works
Radio array starts_worksRadio array starts_works
Radio array starts_works
 

More from home

Slide 9
Slide 9Slide 9
Slide 9home
 
Slide 8
Slide 8Slide 8
Slide 8home
 
Slide 7
Slide 7Slide 7
Slide 7home
 
Slide 5
Slide 5Slide 5
Slide 5home
 
16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km height
16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km height16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km height
16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km heighthome
 
15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km height
15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km height15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km height
15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km heighthome
 
14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrum
14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrum14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrum
14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrumhome
 
13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrum
13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrum13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrum
13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrumhome
 
12.Padmanabha Rao Effect
12.Padmanabha Rao Effect12.Padmanabha Rao Effect
12.Padmanabha Rao Effecthome
 
11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Rao
11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Rao11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Rao
11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Raohome
 
10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF source
10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF source10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF source
10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF sourcehome
 
8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...
8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...
8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...home
 
5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...
5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...
5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...home
 
4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometer
4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometer4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometer
4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometerhome
 
3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMI
3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMI3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMI
3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMIhome
 
2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UK
2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UK2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UK
2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UKhome
 
1.SURPRISE FINDING
1.SURPRISE FINDING1.SURPRISE FINDING
1.SURPRISE FINDINGhome
 
[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...
[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...
[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...home
 
Paper 4: his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...
Paper 4:  his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...Paper 4:  his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...
Paper 4: his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...
home
 

More from home (19)

Slide 9
Slide 9Slide 9
Slide 9
 
Slide 8
Slide 8Slide 8
Slide 8
 
Slide 7
Slide 7Slide 7
Slide 7
 
Slide 5
Slide 5Slide 5
Slide 5
 
16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km height
16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km height16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km height
16.Suns Bharat Radiation up to 130 km height
 
15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km height
15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km height15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km height
15. Only solar X-rays at 100 km height
 
14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrum
14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrum14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrum
14. Discovery of Bharat Radiation wavelengths in solar spectrum
 
13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrum
13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrum13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrum
13. Similarity of Rb XRF source spectrum and solar spectrum
 
12.Padmanabha Rao Effect
12.Padmanabha Rao Effect12.Padmanabha Rao Effect
12.Padmanabha Rao Effect
 
11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Rao
11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Rao11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Rao
11.atomic_state_of_solds_radioisotopes_found_by_Rao
 
10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF source
10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF source10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF source
10. Spectacularly high counts from Rb XRF source
 
8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...
8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...
8. Variation of UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities with beta, gamma,or X-...
 
5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...
5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...
5. First experimental detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radiois...
 
4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometer
4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometer4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometer
4. Uncoomon experimental set-up- Gamma Ray Spectrometer
 
3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMI
3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMI3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMI
3. Bare photomultiplier tube 9635Q Thorn EMI
 
2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UK
2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UK2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UK
2.Two experimental physics discoveries from AMC2084,UK
 
1.SURPRISE FINDING
1.SURPRISE FINDING1.SURPRISE FINDING
1.SURPRISE FINDING
 
[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...
[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...
[Slashdot] Nobel Prize for Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon to Follow - utassau...
 
Paper 4: his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...
Paper 4:  his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...Paper 4:  his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...
Paper 4: his paper should be read after reading the paper on Discovery of Su...
 

Recently uploaded

(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
Scintica Instrumentation
 
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensiveLateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
silvermistyshot
 
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also FunctionsMammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
YOGESH DOGRA
 
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
 Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
SAMIR PANDA
 
bordetella pertussis.................................ppt
bordetella pertussis.................................pptbordetella pertussis.................................ppt
bordetella pertussis.................................ppt
kejapriya1
 
GBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram Staining
GBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram StainingGBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram Staining
GBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram Staining
Areesha Ahmad
 
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdfUnveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Erdal Coalmaker
 
BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiology
BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiologyBLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiology
BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiology
NoelManyise1
 
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATIONPRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
ChetanK57
 
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyNutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Lokesh Patil
 
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptxBody fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
muralinath2
 
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptxin vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
yusufzako14
 
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
Sérgio Sacani
 
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptxHemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
muralinath2
 
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptxIn silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
AlaminAfendy1
 
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
yqqaatn0
 
general properties of oerganologametal.ppt
general properties of oerganologametal.pptgeneral properties of oerganologametal.ppt
general properties of oerganologametal.ppt
IqrimaNabilatulhusni
 
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...
Studia Poinsotiana
 
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
University of Maribor
 
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWSOrion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Columbia Weather Systems
 

Recently uploaded (20)

(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
 
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensiveLateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
 
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also FunctionsMammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
 
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
 Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
 
bordetella pertussis.................................ppt
bordetella pertussis.................................pptbordetella pertussis.................................ppt
bordetella pertussis.................................ppt
 
GBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram Staining
GBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram StainingGBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram Staining
GBSN- Microbiology (Lab 3) Gram Staining
 
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdfUnveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
 
BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiology
BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiologyBLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiology
BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENT- introduction to blood physiology
 
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATIONPRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
 
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyNutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
 
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptxBody fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
 
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptxin vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
 
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
 
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptxHemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
 
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptxIn silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
 
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
 
general properties of oerganologametal.ppt
general properties of oerganologametal.pptgeneral properties of oerganologametal.ppt
general properties of oerganologametal.ppt
 
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...
 
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
 
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWSOrion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
 

Research Paper 2: This paper should be read after reading Brazilian Jour.Phy, March 2010

  • 1. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page5 Padmanabha Rao MA 114 Charak Sadan, Vikas Puri, New Delhi 110018, India, E-mail: raomap@yahoo.com Received 28 January; accepted 23 March; published online 01 April; printed 16 April 2013 1. LATEST DISCOVERIES IN NUCLEAR AND X-RAY PHYSICS, ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, AND SOLAR PHYSICS 1.1. What is already known? In 1896, Antoine Henri Becquerel discovered the phenomenon of natural radioactivity from potassium uranyl sulfate salt. When the salt was subjected to magnetic field, the radiation he detected has negative, positive, and electrically neutral charges. Marie Curie termed 'radioactivity' to the phenomenon of these new emissions. Ernest Rutherford, who studied the properties of radioactive decay named these three radiations as alpha, beta, and gamma. While brilliant phosphorescence from the chemical compound potassium uranyl sulfate is well documented, fluorescent light emission from individual excited atoms in artificially produced radioisotopes remained elusive to previous researchers. 1.2. New Physics Over a century later to the discovery of radioactivity by Henri Becquerel, the author has discovered two generations of γ, β and X-ray emissions, namely Bharat Radiation followed by UV dominant optical radiation from within the one and the same excited atom of a radioisotope or XRF source by Padmanabha Rao Effect, a previously unknown phenomenon, 1.3. A surprise finding led to these new findings in Physics Many of the discoveries in science resulted from an unexpected finding. A surprise finding, Rb XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) showing 125,321 cps instead of the expected 4,400 Rb X-ray photon yield sec-1 0.5 steradian-1 triggered this entire study just to unfold why these spectacularly high counts. In the absence of prior theory or any experimental study on the subject, further experiments incredibly suggested the possibility of optical radiation with low quantum yield from the source. 1.4. Why previous researchers failed to detect the optical emission? There are further reasons why optical emission has evaded from previous researchers all these years. Firstly, the dominant UV not only invisible like ionizing radiations but also follows the later from one and the same source. Secondly, photomultiplier tube simultaneously detects γ, β, and X-ray emissions as well as UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions. 1.5. Three Experimental Discoveries After 4 years of experimental research at the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan State in India , author suspected that optical radiation might be the cause for excessively high counts from Rb XRF source, but unsure whether it was merely luminescence. Another two years were spent in developing two elegant optical techniques using narrow band optical filters in one technique and a pair of sheet polarizers in another technique that greatly helped in providing first and definite evidence on light emission and in estimating very low UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities despite the interfering ionizing DISCOVERY • LETTERS • PHYSICS Discovery, Volume 4, Number 10, April 2013 Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources ISSN2278–5469EISSN2278–5450 Henri Becquerel Marie Curie Pierre Curie Ernest Rutherford The experimental set up is a simple Gamma ray Spectrometer from Electronics Corporation of India, Hyderabad, India. The successful detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes and XRF sources owes to setting gain of the linear amplifier to be slightly higher than what is required normally to a scintillation detector. The success of light detection also owes to directly keeping the XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) on the photomultiplier tube 9635QB (PMT), Thorn EMI as shown above. The probe consisting of this photomultiplier tube and preamplifier was kept in a metal container and tightly covered so as to be free from any light leak. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page5 Padmanabha Rao MA 114 Charak Sadan, Vikas Puri, New Delhi 110018, India, E-mail: raomap@yahoo.com Received 28 January; accepted 23 March; published online 01 April; printed 16 April 2013 1. LATEST DISCOVERIES IN NUCLEAR AND X-RAY PHYSICS, ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, AND SOLAR PHYSICS 1.1. What is already known? In 1896, Antoine Henri Becquerel discovered the phenomenon of natural radioactivity from potassium uranyl sulfate salt. When the salt was subjected to magnetic field, the radiation he detected has negative, positive, and electrically neutral charges. Marie Curie termed 'radioactivity' to the phenomenon of these new emissions. Ernest Rutherford, who studied the properties of radioactive decay named these three radiations as alpha, beta, and gamma. While brilliant phosphorescence from the chemical compound potassium uranyl sulfate is well documented, fluorescent light emission from individual excited atoms in artificially produced radioisotopes remained elusive to previous researchers. 1.2. New Physics Over a century later to the discovery of radioactivity by Henri Becquerel, the author has discovered two generations of γ, β and X-ray emissions, namely Bharat Radiation followed by UV dominant optical radiation from within the one and the same excited atom of a radioisotope or XRF source by Padmanabha Rao Effect, a previously unknown phenomenon, 1.3. A surprise finding led to these new findings in Physics Many of the discoveries in science resulted from an unexpected finding. A surprise finding, Rb XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) showing 125,321 cps instead of the expected 4,400 Rb X-ray photon yield sec-1 0.5 steradian-1 triggered this entire study just to unfold why these spectacularly high counts. In the absence of prior theory or any experimental study on the subject, further experiments incredibly suggested the possibility of optical radiation with low quantum yield from the source. 1.4. Why previous researchers failed to detect the optical emission? There are further reasons why optical emission has evaded from previous researchers all these years. Firstly, the dominant UV not only invisible like ionizing radiations but also follows the later from one and the same source. Secondly, photomultiplier tube simultaneously detects γ, β, and X-ray emissions as well as UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions. 1.5. Three Experimental Discoveries After 4 years of experimental research at the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan State in India , author suspected that optical radiation might be the cause for excessively high counts from Rb XRF source, but unsure whether it was merely luminescence. Another two years were spent in developing two elegant optical techniques using narrow band optical filters in one technique and a pair of sheet polarizers in another technique that greatly helped in providing first and definite evidence on light emission and in estimating very low UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities despite the interfering ionizing DISCOVERY • LETTERS • PHYSICS Discovery, Volume 4, Number 10, April 2013 Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources ISSN2278–5469EISSN2278–5450 Henri Becquerel Marie Curie Pierre Curie Ernest Rutherford The experimental set up is a simple Gamma ray Spectrometer from Electronics Corporation of India, Hyderabad, India. The successful detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes and XRF sources owes to setting gain of the linear amplifier to be slightly higher than what is required normally to a scintillation detector. The success of light detection also owes to directly keeping the XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) on the photomultiplier tube 9635QB (PMT), Thorn EMI as shown above. The probe consisting of this photomultiplier tube and preamplifier was kept in a metal container and tightly covered so as to be free from any light leak. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page5 Padmanabha Rao MA 114 Charak Sadan, Vikas Puri, New Delhi 110018, India, E-mail: raomap@yahoo.com Received 28 January; accepted 23 March; published online 01 April; printed 16 April 2013 1. LATEST DISCOVERIES IN NUCLEAR AND X-RAY PHYSICS, ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, AND SOLAR PHYSICS 1.1. What is already known? In 1896, Antoine Henri Becquerel discovered the phenomenon of natural radioactivity from potassium uranyl sulfate salt. When the salt was subjected to magnetic field, the radiation he detected has negative, positive, and electrically neutral charges. Marie Curie termed 'radioactivity' to the phenomenon of these new emissions. Ernest Rutherford, who studied the properties of radioactive decay named these three radiations as alpha, beta, and gamma. While brilliant phosphorescence from the chemical compound potassium uranyl sulfate is well documented, fluorescent light emission from individual excited atoms in artificially produced radioisotopes remained elusive to previous researchers. 1.2. New Physics Over a century later to the discovery of radioactivity by Henri Becquerel, the author has discovered two generations of γ, β and X-ray emissions, namely Bharat Radiation followed by UV dominant optical radiation from within the one and the same excited atom of a radioisotope or XRF source by Padmanabha Rao Effect, a previously unknown phenomenon, 1.3. A surprise finding led to these new findings in Physics Many of the discoveries in science resulted from an unexpected finding. A surprise finding, Rb XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) showing 125,321 cps instead of the expected 4,400 Rb X-ray photon yield sec-1 0.5 steradian-1 triggered this entire study just to unfold why these spectacularly high counts. In the absence of prior theory or any experimental study on the subject, further experiments incredibly suggested the possibility of optical radiation with low quantum yield from the source. 1.4. Why previous researchers failed to detect the optical emission? There are further reasons why optical emission has evaded from previous researchers all these years. Firstly, the dominant UV not only invisible like ionizing radiations but also follows the later from one and the same source. Secondly, photomultiplier tube simultaneously detects γ, β, and X-ray emissions as well as UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions. 1.5. Three Experimental Discoveries After 4 years of experimental research at the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan State in India , author suspected that optical radiation might be the cause for excessively high counts from Rb XRF source, but unsure whether it was merely luminescence. Another two years were spent in developing two elegant optical techniques using narrow band optical filters in one technique and a pair of sheet polarizers in another technique that greatly helped in providing first and definite evidence on light emission and in estimating very low UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities despite the interfering ionizing DISCOVERY • LETTERS • PHYSICS Discovery, Volume 4, Number 10, April 2013 Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources ISSN2278–5469EISSN2278–5450 Henri Becquerel Marie Curie Pierre Curie Ernest Rutherford The experimental set up is a simple Gamma ray Spectrometer from Electronics Corporation of India, Hyderabad, India. The successful detection of UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes and XRF sources owes to setting gain of the linear amplifier to be slightly higher than what is required normally to a scintillation detector. The success of light detection also owes to directly keeping the XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) on the photomultiplier tube 9635QB (PMT), Thorn EMI as shown above. The probe consisting of this photomultiplier tube and preamplifier was kept in a metal container and tightly covered so as to be free from any light leak.
  • 2. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page6 radiations. Essentially these techniques led to a key finding that γ, β, or X-ray emission commonly causes UV dominant optical emission from the same excited atom in a radioisotope or XRF source. This experimental research led to three fundamental discoveries significant to X-ray physics, nuclear physics and atomic spectroscopy. 2. Discovery 1: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION NEWLY DETECTED FROM RADIOISOTOPES PRESENT AS RADIOCHEMICALS Ever since the synthesis of new artificially produced radioisotopes by Irène Curie and Frédéric Joliot, optical emission was never reported from radioisotopes by previous researchers. 2.1. New to Nuclear Physics Radioisotopes are available either in the form of a salt called radiochemical or as a metal. For the first time, the author has experimentally detected very weak UV dominant optical emission invisible to the naked eye from all the radiochemicals tested such as 55 Fe, 113 Sn, 131 I, 137 Cs, and 90 Y with an exception of 3 H [1-9]. These radiochemicals have shown emission of an unprecedented nature of optical spectrum, dominated by UV to the extent of 83 to 97% in gross light intensity, while this % UV depends upon γ-, X-ray, or β energy. For example, low energy (0.02421 MeV) of dominant Indium X-rays of 113 Sn caused UV as high as 96.95%, while visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) radiation intensities remained low at 2.21 % and 0.84% respectively [1]. Similarly, low energy γ of 241 Am has caused 98.03% (UV), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities remained low at 1.91% and 0.06% respectively. In contrast, high energy β from 90 Y caused just UV (83.36%), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities rose correspondingly to 8.02% and 8.62% respectively. Optical emission from radiochemicals has fundamental significance to nuclear physics, and simultaneous measurement of γ-, X-ray, β and optical intensities help in more accurate estimation of tracers than ever before. 3. Discovery 2: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM XRF SOURCES PRESENT AS SALTS W.C. Roentgen has discovered X-rays from discharge tube in 1895. These X-rays known as bremsstrahlung radiation or continuous X-rays are widely used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes. However, light emission following X-rays from X-ray tubes remained elusive to previous researchers. In the later years, C.G. Barkla has discovered characteristic X-rays of elements. These X-rays are called XRF (X-ray fluorescence). Variable Energy X-ray Source (AMC 2084, U.K.) of the size of a lemon used in the current study was manufactured with an intend to provide Rb, Ba and Tb X-rays with different energies from Rb, Ba and Tb XRF sources present as Rb, Ba and Tb salts on incidence of intense gamma beam from 241 Am. The source also provides Cu, Ag, and Mo X-rays with different energies from Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as Cu, Ag, and Mo metals. Light emission remained elusive to previous researchers from any XRF source. 3.1. New to X-ray Physics Characteristic X-rays (XRF) causing UV dominant optical emission by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon is new to X-ray physics. Of all the sources tested, the maximum UV dominant optical intensity has come from Rb XRF source. The low 0.013336 MeV Rb X-ray energy could cause the maximum UV (99.62%) intensity, while VIS (0.37% ), and NIR (0.01%) radiation intensities remained very low in the gross light intensity. Likewise, Ba X-rays from Ba XRF source, and Tb X-rays from Tb XRF source present as Ba, and Tb salts respectively also showed the UV dominant optical emission [1]. Since both X-ray tube and XRF source emit basically X-rays, optical emission is expected even from X-ray tubes used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes. As both X-ray and optical spectra can now be detected simultaneously, the data available opens up wide range of applications in future. 4. Discovery 3: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM METALS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE WHEN PRESENT AS RADIOISOTOPES OR XRF SOURCES UV emission from metal sources remained elusive to previous researchers until the current study. Therefore, unprecedented detection of UV dominant optical emission from metals at room temperature could be a revolutionary experimental finding in the history of science. Optical emission was detected from cobalt metal when present as 57 Co (AMC, U.K.); 60 Co useful in cancer treatment; and also from Cu, Mo, and Ag metals present as Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources of AMC 2084,U.K. The optical radiation originating from metal sources hold vital key that it should be atomic emission of light from excited atoms in radioisotopes and XRF sources. Metal 57 Co spectrum detected notably at room temperature pinpointed that the dominant γ-rays might be causing atomic emission spectrum from within the same excited 57 Co atom by a previously unknown phenomenon that led to subatomic research. The novel optical technique shown here (a) gives a glimpse how the photomultiplier tube (9635QB Thorn EMI) has simultaneously detected γ-rays, Fe X-rays and the successive and previously unknown UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions from metal 57 Co unprecedented at room temperature. Use of a pair of sheet polarizers helped in estimating the UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities in gross light intensity by subtracting counts between two successive steps [1]. Though metal is totally opaque to light, yet light emission that was detected has come from surface of the source. In order to explain these three experimental breakthroughs, previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research Irène Curie Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen Charles Glover Barkla Two experimental discoveries in physics could be made from Variable Energy X-ray Source, AMC 2084 (U.K.) shown on the left. Along with X-rays, UV dominant optical emission emerging through the hole shown here was newly detected from (1) Rb, Ba, and Tb XRF sources present as salts, and (2) Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as metals. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page6 radiations. Essentially these techniques led to a key finding that γ, β, or X-ray emission commonly causes UV dominant optical emission from the same excited atom in a radioisotope or XRF source. This experimental research led to three fundamental discoveries significant to X-ray physics, nuclear physics and atomic spectroscopy. 2. Discovery 1: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION NEWLY DETECTED FROM RADIOISOTOPES PRESENT AS RADIOCHEMICALS Ever since the synthesis of new artificially produced radioisotopes by Irène Curie and Frédéric Joliot, optical emission was never reported from radioisotopes by previous researchers. 2.1. New to Nuclear Physics Radioisotopes are available either in the form of a salt called radiochemical or as a metal. For the first time, the author has experimentally detected very weak UV dominant optical emission invisible to the naked eye from all the radiochemicals tested such as 55 Fe, 113 Sn, 131 I, 137 Cs, and 90 Y with an exception of 3 H [1-9]. These radiochemicals have shown emission of an unprecedented nature of optical spectrum, dominated by UV to the extent of 83 to 97% in gross light intensity, while this % UV depends upon γ-, X-ray, or β energy. For example, low energy (0.02421 MeV) of dominant Indium X-rays of 113 Sn caused UV as high as 96.95%, while visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) radiation intensities remained low at 2.21 % and 0.84% respectively [1]. Similarly, low energy γ of 241 Am has caused 98.03% (UV), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities remained low at 1.91% and 0.06% respectively. In contrast, high energy β from 90 Y caused just UV (83.36%), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities rose correspondingly to 8.02% and 8.62% respectively. Optical emission from radiochemicals has fundamental significance to nuclear physics, and simultaneous measurement of γ-, X-ray, β and optical intensities help in more accurate estimation of tracers than ever before. 3. Discovery 2: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM XRF SOURCES PRESENT AS SALTS W.C. Roentgen has discovered X-rays from discharge tube in 1895. These X-rays known as bremsstrahlung radiation or continuous X-rays are widely used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes. However, light emission following X-rays from X-ray tubes remained elusive to previous researchers. In the later years, C.G. Barkla has discovered characteristic X-rays of elements. These X-rays are called XRF (X-ray fluorescence). Variable Energy X-ray Source (AMC 2084, U.K.) of the size of a lemon used in the current study was manufactured with an intend to provide Rb, Ba and Tb X-rays with different energies from Rb, Ba and Tb XRF sources present as Rb, Ba and Tb salts on incidence of intense gamma beam from 241 Am. The source also provides Cu, Ag, and Mo X-rays with different energies from Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as Cu, Ag, and Mo metals. Light emission remained elusive to previous researchers from any XRF source. 3.1. New to X-ray Physics Characteristic X-rays (XRF) causing UV dominant optical emission by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon is new to X-ray physics. Of all the sources tested, the maximum UV dominant optical intensity has come from Rb XRF source. The low 0.013336 MeV Rb X-ray energy could cause the maximum UV (99.62%) intensity, while VIS (0.37% ), and NIR (0.01%) radiation intensities remained very low in the gross light intensity. Likewise, Ba X-rays from Ba XRF source, and Tb X-rays from Tb XRF source present as Ba, and Tb salts respectively also showed the UV dominant optical emission [1]. Since both X-ray tube and XRF source emit basically X-rays, optical emission is expected even from X-ray tubes used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes. As both X-ray and optical spectra can now be detected simultaneously, the data available opens up wide range of applications in future. 4. Discovery 3: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM METALS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE WHEN PRESENT AS RADIOISOTOPES OR XRF SOURCES UV emission from metal sources remained elusive to previous researchers until the current study. Therefore, unprecedented detection of UV dominant optical emission from metals at room temperature could be a revolutionary experimental finding in the history of science. Optical emission was detected from cobalt metal when present as 57 Co (AMC, U.K.); 60 Co useful in cancer treatment; and also from Cu, Mo, and Ag metals present as Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources of AMC 2084,U.K. The optical radiation originating from metal sources hold vital key that it should be atomic emission of light from excited atoms in radioisotopes and XRF sources. Metal 57 Co spectrum detected notably at room temperature pinpointed that the dominant γ-rays might be causing atomic emission spectrum from within the same excited 57 Co atom by a previously unknown phenomenon that led to subatomic research. The novel optical technique shown here (a) gives a glimpse how the photomultiplier tube (9635QB Thorn EMI) has simultaneously detected γ-rays, Fe X-rays and the successive and previously unknown UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions from metal 57 Co unprecedented at room temperature. Use of a pair of sheet polarizers helped in estimating the UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities in gross light intensity by subtracting counts between two successive steps [1]. Though metal is totally opaque to light, yet light emission that was detected has come from surface of the source. In order to explain these three experimental breakthroughs, previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research Irène Curie Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen Charles Glover Barkla Two experimental discoveries in physics could be made from Variable Energy X-ray Source, AMC 2084 (U.K.) shown on the left. Along with X-rays, UV dominant optical emission emerging through the hole shown here was newly detected from (1) Rb, Ba, and Tb XRF sources present as salts, and (2) Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as metals. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page6 radiations. Essentially these techniques led to a key finding that γ, β, or X-ray emission commonly causes UV dominant optical emission from the same excited atom in a radioisotope or XRF source. This experimental research led to three fundamental discoveries significant to X-ray physics, nuclear physics and atomic spectroscopy. 2. Discovery 1: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION NEWLY DETECTED FROM RADIOISOTOPES PRESENT AS RADIOCHEMICALS Ever since the synthesis of new artificially produced radioisotopes by Irène Curie and Frédéric Joliot, optical emission was never reported from radioisotopes by previous researchers. 2.1. New to Nuclear Physics Radioisotopes are available either in the form of a salt called radiochemical or as a metal. For the first time, the author has experimentally detected very weak UV dominant optical emission invisible to the naked eye from all the radiochemicals tested such as 55 Fe, 113 Sn, 131 I, 137 Cs, and 90 Y with an exception of 3 H [1-9]. These radiochemicals have shown emission of an unprecedented nature of optical spectrum, dominated by UV to the extent of 83 to 97% in gross light intensity, while this % UV depends upon γ-, X-ray, or β energy. For example, low energy (0.02421 MeV) of dominant Indium X-rays of 113 Sn caused UV as high as 96.95%, while visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) radiation intensities remained low at 2.21 % and 0.84% respectively [1]. Similarly, low energy γ of 241 Am has caused 98.03% (UV), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities remained low at 1.91% and 0.06% respectively. In contrast, high energy β from 90 Y caused just UV (83.36%), while VIS and NIR radiation intensities rose correspondingly to 8.02% and 8.62% respectively. Optical emission from radiochemicals has fundamental significance to nuclear physics, and simultaneous measurement of γ-, X-ray, β and optical intensities help in more accurate estimation of tracers than ever before. 3. Discovery 2: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM XRF SOURCES PRESENT AS SALTS W.C. Roentgen has discovered X-rays from discharge tube in 1895. These X-rays known as bremsstrahlung radiation or continuous X-rays are widely used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes. However, light emission following X-rays from X-ray tubes remained elusive to previous researchers. In the later years, C.G. Barkla has discovered characteristic X-rays of elements. These X-rays are called XRF (X-ray fluorescence). Variable Energy X-ray Source (AMC 2084, U.K.) of the size of a lemon used in the current study was manufactured with an intend to provide Rb, Ba and Tb X-rays with different energies from Rb, Ba and Tb XRF sources present as Rb, Ba and Tb salts on incidence of intense gamma beam from 241 Am. The source also provides Cu, Ag, and Mo X-rays with different energies from Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as Cu, Ag, and Mo metals. Light emission remained elusive to previous researchers from any XRF source. 3.1. New to X-ray Physics Characteristic X-rays (XRF) causing UV dominant optical emission by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon is new to X-ray physics. Of all the sources tested, the maximum UV dominant optical intensity has come from Rb XRF source. The low 0.013336 MeV Rb X-ray energy could cause the maximum UV (99.62%) intensity, while VIS (0.37% ), and NIR (0.01%) radiation intensities remained very low in the gross light intensity. Likewise, Ba X-rays from Ba XRF source, and Tb X-rays from Tb XRF source present as Ba, and Tb salts respectively also showed the UV dominant optical emission [1]. Since both X-ray tube and XRF source emit basically X-rays, optical emission is expected even from X-ray tubes used in Hospitals for diagnostic purposes. As both X-ray and optical spectra can now be detected simultaneously, the data available opens up wide range of applications in future. 4. Discovery 3: UV DOMINANT OPTICAL EMISSION FROM METALS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE WHEN PRESENT AS RADIOISOTOPES OR XRF SOURCES UV emission from metal sources remained elusive to previous researchers until the current study. Therefore, unprecedented detection of UV dominant optical emission from metals at room temperature could be a revolutionary experimental finding in the history of science. Optical emission was detected from cobalt metal when present as 57 Co (AMC, U.K.); 60 Co useful in cancer treatment; and also from Cu, Mo, and Ag metals present as Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources of AMC 2084,U.K. The optical radiation originating from metal sources hold vital key that it should be atomic emission of light from excited atoms in radioisotopes and XRF sources. Metal 57 Co spectrum detected notably at room temperature pinpointed that the dominant γ-rays might be causing atomic emission spectrum from within the same excited 57 Co atom by a previously unknown phenomenon that led to subatomic research. The novel optical technique shown here (a) gives a glimpse how the photomultiplier tube (9635QB Thorn EMI) has simultaneously detected γ-rays, Fe X-rays and the successive and previously unknown UV, visible (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiation emissions from metal 57 Co unprecedented at room temperature. Use of a pair of sheet polarizers helped in estimating the UV, VIS, and NIR radiation intensities in gross light intensity by subtracting counts between two successive steps [1]. Though metal is totally opaque to light, yet light emission that was detected has come from surface of the source. In order to explain these three experimental breakthroughs, previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research Irène Curie Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen Charles Glover Barkla Two experimental discoveries in physics could be made from Variable Energy X-ray Source, AMC 2084 (U.K.) shown on the left. Along with X-rays, UV dominant optical emission emerging through the hole shown here was newly detected from (1) Rb, Ba, and Tb XRF sources present as salts, and (2) Cu, Ag, and Mo XRF sources present as metals.
  • 3. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page7 into excited atoms of radioisotopes and XRF sources led into a crop of three more fundamental physics discoveries. 5. Discovery 4: PREDICTED THE EXISTENCE OF BHARAT RADIATION Ionizing radiation emissions causing fluorescent light emission from within an excited atom being new to nuclear physics, X-ray physics and atomic spectroscopy, the author has provided the most plausible explanation. In the first step towards this direction, a need arose to address the limitation that the ionizing radiations with keV or MeV energies known to knock out valence electron fail to do valence excitation to optical levels. The author has thus made an important postulate that within an excited atom the ionizing radiations first generate some exciting energy to be slightly higher than that of the observed UV at eV level, so that they do valence excitation resulting into UV emission. 5.1. Electromagnetic Spectrum redefined It is well known that Rb salt emits Rb X- ray spectrum when irradiated with an intense gamma beam and emits the basic atomic spectrum when heated to high temperatures, as exemplified on the left and right sides of the figure below. When these two spectra are viewed together, a wavelength gap becomes evident in between the two. For the first time the author has shown existence of a wavelength gap from 12.87 to 47.488 nm in electromagnetic spectrum and also pinpointed the location of these predicted wavelengths in the gap. 5.2. Location of Bharat Radiation in E.M. Spectrum In the case of Rb XRF source, the location of wavelengths from 12.87 to 47.488 nm generated by Rb X-rays was predicted to be next to Rb X-ray wavelength range. And EUV and UV dominant optical wavelengths to be immediately next to the 12.87 to 47.488 nm range in electromagnetic spectrum. These wavelengths existing in between X-ray and optical spectra of electromagnetic spectrum and do not belong to either X-rays or light cannot be called either as X-rays or light, say from Rb XRF source. That is why these wavelengths were termed as "Bharat Radiation", for convenience. The schematic diagram shown here is the latest Rb XRF spectrum with two new emissions, Bharat and optical wavelengths lying side by side. Bharat Radiation wavelengths produced by γ or β from a radioisotope also would be situated within the same 12.87 to 47.488 nm. That means the latest γ or β spectrum includes two new emissions Bharat and optical wavelengths lying side by side. Though it was not possible to detect Bharat Radiation with photomultiplier tube, the author has recently discovered Bharat Radiation wavelengths from12.87 to 31 nm in solar spectra measured by various researchers since 1960s [12]. 6. Discovery 5: A NEW CLASS OF ‘ROOM TEMPERATURE ATOMIC SPECTRA OF SOLID RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES’ CAUSED BY BHARAT RADIATION So far only one kind of atomic spectra is known in literature that can be caused by thermal excitation. However, the current study has unveiled a new class of atomic spectra in the field of atomic spectroscopy exclusively from radioisotopes and XRF sources, since valence excitation takes place by Bharat Radiation energy higher than thermal energy produced by γ, β or X-ray energy within the same excited atom. For these reasons, UV dominant atomic spectra of ionizing radiation sources widely differed from basic atomic spectra. In these spectra UV would always be over 83% in the gross light intensity, while VIS and NIR radiation intensities share the remaining 17%. Low γ, β or X-ray energy from sources such as Rb XRF source, 113 Sn, and 133 Ba could emit UV with intensity above 95%, while the VIS and NIR radiations shared the rest 5%. Comparatively, high β energy from 90 Ycould hardly cause 83.36% UV intensity, while VIS and NIR intensities correspondingly rose to 8.02% and 8.62%. Difference in nature of spectrum is evident between Rb XRF source and 86 Rb, and between 57 Co and 60 Co [1]. This is due to the fact that the nature of atomic spectrum of any source depends purely upon its ionizing radiation energy regardless of atomic number Z, the type of radiation whether γ, β or X-ray, and nature of source medium whether salt or metal. These spectra can be produced not only from radioisotopes, but also from salts or metals on bombarding with intense gamma beam from source such as 241 Am, as happens with AMC 2084, U.K. Bharat and optical emissions now available, besides X-rays from a XRF source, and besides γ, and β emissions from a radioisotope open up new frontiers for research and wide range of applications. Futuristic studies on the nature of atomic spectra of radioisotopes and XRF sources provide a new understanding on the energy levels of excited atom. 6.1. New ‘atomic state of solids’ The question arises how solids can emit atomic spectra at room temperature. Valence excitation by Bharat radiation set the excited atoms free from surrounding unexcited atoms in ground state. As the excited atoms in radioisotopes and XRF sources remain temporarily Of all the sources tested, Rb XRF source in AMC 2084, U.K. has shown spectacularly high counts. Just 4400 Rb X-ray pulses sec _1 have caused Bharat Radiation, in turn caused 125,321 counts per sec due to UV dominant optical emission within excited Rb atoms. That means each X-ray has caused 28 light photons. Similarly, Ba X- rays caused these two emissions in Ba salt, and Cu X-rays did from metal Cu in AMC 2084,U.K. Beta energy (0.314 MeV) within an excited 60 Co atom in metal 60 Co source first causes Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission. Likewise, the two γ-energies 1.17 and 1.33 MeV also cause two more generations: Bharat radiation, followed by UV dominant optical emission. Metal 57 Co source emits UV intensity as high as 88.18% notably at room temperature. Since excited 57 Co atoms acted like free atoms, though surrounded by stable Co atoms at ground state in metal 57 Co source, 0.1221 MeV γ-rays caused Bharat Radiation in turn caused UV dominant optical emission from excited atoms shown in dark shade. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page7 into excited atoms of radioisotopes and XRF sources led into a crop of three more fundamental physics discoveries. 5. Discovery 4: PREDICTED THE EXISTENCE OF BHARAT RADIATION Ionizing radiation emissions causing fluorescent light emission from within an excited atom being new to nuclear physics, X-ray physics and atomic spectroscopy, the author has provided the most plausible explanation. In the first step towards this direction, a need arose to address the limitation that the ionizing radiations with keV or MeV energies known to knock out valence electron fail to do valence excitation to optical levels. The author has thus made an important postulate that within an excited atom the ionizing radiations first generate some exciting energy to be slightly higher than that of the observed UV at eV level, so that they do valence excitation resulting into UV emission. 5.1. Electromagnetic Spectrum redefined It is well known that Rb salt emits Rb X- ray spectrum when irradiated with an intense gamma beam and emits the basic atomic spectrum when heated to high temperatures, as exemplified on the left and right sides of the figure below. When these two spectra are viewed together, a wavelength gap becomes evident in between the two. For the first time the author has shown existence of a wavelength gap from 12.87 to 47.488 nm in electromagnetic spectrum and also pinpointed the location of these predicted wavelengths in the gap. 5.2. Location of Bharat Radiation in E.M. Spectrum In the case of Rb XRF source, the location of wavelengths from 12.87 to 47.488 nm generated by Rb X-rays was predicted to be next to Rb X-ray wavelength range. And EUV and UV dominant optical wavelengths to be immediately next to the 12.87 to 47.488 nm range in electromagnetic spectrum. These wavelengths existing in between X-ray and optical spectra of electromagnetic spectrum and do not belong to either X-rays or light cannot be called either as X-rays or light, say from Rb XRF source. That is why these wavelengths were termed as "Bharat Radiation", for convenience. The schematic diagram shown here is the latest Rb XRF spectrum with two new emissions, Bharat and optical wavelengths lying side by side. Bharat Radiation wavelengths produced by γ or β from a radioisotope also would be situated within the same 12.87 to 47.488 nm. That means the latest γ or β spectrum includes two new emissions Bharat and optical wavelengths lying side by side. Though it was not possible to detect Bharat Radiation with photomultiplier tube, the author has recently discovered Bharat Radiation wavelengths from12.87 to 31 nm in solar spectra measured by various researchers since 1960s [12]. 6. Discovery 5: A NEW CLASS OF ‘ROOM TEMPERATURE ATOMIC SPECTRA OF SOLID RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES’ CAUSED BY BHARAT RADIATION So far only one kind of atomic spectra is known in literature that can be caused by thermal excitation. However, the current study has unveiled a new class of atomic spectra in the field of atomic spectroscopy exclusively from radioisotopes and XRF sources, since valence excitation takes place by Bharat Radiation energy higher than thermal energy produced by γ, β or X-ray energy within the same excited atom. For these reasons, UV dominant atomic spectra of ionizing radiation sources widely differed from basic atomic spectra. In these spectra UV would always be over 83% in the gross light intensity, while VIS and NIR radiation intensities share the remaining 17%. Low γ, β or X-ray energy from sources such as Rb XRF source, 113 Sn, and 133 Ba could emit UV with intensity above 95%, while the VIS and NIR radiations shared the rest 5%. Comparatively, high β energy from 90 Ycould hardly cause 83.36% UV intensity, while VIS and NIR intensities correspondingly rose to 8.02% and 8.62%. Difference in nature of spectrum is evident between Rb XRF source and 86 Rb, and between 57 Co and 60 Co [1]. This is due to the fact that the nature of atomic spectrum of any source depends purely upon its ionizing radiation energy regardless of atomic number Z, the type of radiation whether γ, β or X-ray, and nature of source medium whether salt or metal. These spectra can be produced not only from radioisotopes, but also from salts or metals on bombarding with intense gamma beam from source such as 241 Am, as happens with AMC 2084, U.K. Bharat and optical emissions now available, besides X-rays from a XRF source, and besides γ, and β emissions from a radioisotope open up new frontiers for research and wide range of applications. Futuristic studies on the nature of atomic spectra of radioisotopes and XRF sources provide a new understanding on the energy levels of excited atom. 6.1. New ‘atomic state of solids’ The question arises how solids can emit atomic spectra at room temperature. Valence excitation by Bharat radiation set the excited atoms free from surrounding unexcited atoms in ground state. As the excited atoms in radioisotopes and XRF sources remain temporarily Of all the sources tested, Rb XRF source in AMC 2084, U.K. has shown spectacularly high counts. Just 4400 Rb X-ray pulses sec _1 have caused Bharat Radiation, in turn caused 125,321 counts per sec due to UV dominant optical emission within excited Rb atoms. That means each X-ray has caused 28 light photons. Similarly, Ba X- rays caused these two emissions in Ba salt, and Cu X-rays did from metal Cu in AMC 2084,U.K. Beta energy (0.314 MeV) within an excited 60 Co atom in metal 60 Co source first causes Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission. Likewise, the two γ-energies 1.17 and 1.33 MeV also cause two more generations: Bharat radiation, followed by UV dominant optical emission. Metal 57 Co source emits UV intensity as high as 88.18% notably at room temperature. Since excited 57 Co atoms acted like free atoms, though surrounded by stable Co atoms at ground state in metal 57 Co source, 0.1221 MeV γ-rays caused Bharat Radiation in turn caused UV dominant optical emission from excited atoms shown in dark shade. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page7 into excited atoms of radioisotopes and XRF sources led into a crop of three more fundamental physics discoveries. 5. Discovery 4: PREDICTED THE EXISTENCE OF BHARAT RADIATION Ionizing radiation emissions causing fluorescent light emission from within an excited atom being new to nuclear physics, X-ray physics and atomic spectroscopy, the author has provided the most plausible explanation. In the first step towards this direction, a need arose to address the limitation that the ionizing radiations with keV or MeV energies known to knock out valence electron fail to do valence excitation to optical levels. The author has thus made an important postulate that within an excited atom the ionizing radiations first generate some exciting energy to be slightly higher than that of the observed UV at eV level, so that they do valence excitation resulting into UV emission. 5.1. Electromagnetic Spectrum redefined It is well known that Rb salt emits Rb X- ray spectrum when irradiated with an intense gamma beam and emits the basic atomic spectrum when heated to high temperatures, as exemplified on the left and right sides of the figure below. When these two spectra are viewed together, a wavelength gap becomes evident in between the two. For the first time the author has shown existence of a wavelength gap from 12.87 to 47.488 nm in electromagnetic spectrum and also pinpointed the location of these predicted wavelengths in the gap. 5.2. Location of Bharat Radiation in E.M. Spectrum In the case of Rb XRF source, the location of wavelengths from 12.87 to 47.488 nm generated by Rb X-rays was predicted to be next to Rb X-ray wavelength range. And EUV and UV dominant optical wavelengths to be immediately next to the 12.87 to 47.488 nm range in electromagnetic spectrum. These wavelengths existing in between X-ray and optical spectra of electromagnetic spectrum and do not belong to either X-rays or light cannot be called either as X-rays or light, say from Rb XRF source. That is why these wavelengths were termed as "Bharat Radiation", for convenience. The schematic diagram shown here is the latest Rb XRF spectrum with two new emissions, Bharat and optical wavelengths lying side by side. Bharat Radiation wavelengths produced by γ or β from a radioisotope also would be situated within the same 12.87 to 47.488 nm. That means the latest γ or β spectrum includes two new emissions Bharat and optical wavelengths lying side by side. Though it was not possible to detect Bharat Radiation with photomultiplier tube, the author has recently discovered Bharat Radiation wavelengths from12.87 to 31 nm in solar spectra measured by various researchers since 1960s [12]. 6. Discovery 5: A NEW CLASS OF ‘ROOM TEMPERATURE ATOMIC SPECTRA OF SOLID RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES’ CAUSED BY BHARAT RADIATION So far only one kind of atomic spectra is known in literature that can be caused by thermal excitation. However, the current study has unveiled a new class of atomic spectra in the field of atomic spectroscopy exclusively from radioisotopes and XRF sources, since valence excitation takes place by Bharat Radiation energy higher than thermal energy produced by γ, β or X-ray energy within the same excited atom. For these reasons, UV dominant atomic spectra of ionizing radiation sources widely differed from basic atomic spectra. In these spectra UV would always be over 83% in the gross light intensity, while VIS and NIR radiation intensities share the remaining 17%. Low γ, β or X-ray energy from sources such as Rb XRF source, 113 Sn, and 133 Ba could emit UV with intensity above 95%, while the VIS and NIR radiations shared the rest 5%. Comparatively, high β energy from 90 Ycould hardly cause 83.36% UV intensity, while VIS and NIR intensities correspondingly rose to 8.02% and 8.62%. Difference in nature of spectrum is evident between Rb XRF source and 86 Rb, and between 57 Co and 60 Co [1]. This is due to the fact that the nature of atomic spectrum of any source depends purely upon its ionizing radiation energy regardless of atomic number Z, the type of radiation whether γ, β or X-ray, and nature of source medium whether salt or metal. These spectra can be produced not only from radioisotopes, but also from salts or metals on bombarding with intense gamma beam from source such as 241 Am, as happens with AMC 2084, U.K. Bharat and optical emissions now available, besides X-rays from a XRF source, and besides γ, and β emissions from a radioisotope open up new frontiers for research and wide range of applications. Futuristic studies on the nature of atomic spectra of radioisotopes and XRF sources provide a new understanding on the energy levels of excited atom. 6.1. New ‘atomic state of solids’ The question arises how solids can emit atomic spectra at room temperature. Valence excitation by Bharat radiation set the excited atoms free from surrounding unexcited atoms in ground state. As the excited atoms in radioisotopes and XRF sources remain temporarily Of all the sources tested, Rb XRF source in AMC 2084, U.K. has shown spectacularly high counts. Just 4400 Rb X-ray pulses sec _1 have caused Bharat Radiation, in turn caused 125,321 counts per sec due to UV dominant optical emission within excited Rb atoms. That means each X-ray has caused 28 light photons. Similarly, Ba X- rays caused these two emissions in Ba salt, and Cu X-rays did from metal Cu in AMC 2084,U.K. Beta energy (0.314 MeV) within an excited 60 Co atom in metal 60 Co source first causes Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission. Likewise, the two γ-energies 1.17 and 1.33 MeV also cause two more generations: Bharat radiation, followed by UV dominant optical emission. Metal 57 Co source emits UV intensity as high as 88.18% notably at room temperature. Since excited 57 Co atoms acted like free atoms, though surrounded by stable Co atoms at ground state in metal 57 Co source, 0.1221 MeV γ-rays caused Bharat Radiation in turn caused UV dominant optical emission from excited atoms shown in dark shade.
  • 4. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page8 as free atoms, the new ‘atomic state of solids’ that exists at room temperature itself is responsible for the typical spectra observed. Understandably, environment of excited atoms in solid radioisotopes and XRF sources that cause UV dominant optical spectra differs much from that of thermally excited atoms in gaseous phase causing the basic atomic spectra. 7. Discovery 6: NEW ATOMIC PHENOMENON (PADMANABHA RAO EFFECT) The previously unknown atomic phenomenon reportedly taking place in radioisotopes and XRF sources explains how γ, β or X-ray successively generates Bharat radiation (first generation), which in turn the UV dominant optical emission (second generation) within the same excited atom [1]. This phenomenon is known as Padmanabha Rao Effect [5-7]. The phenomenon takes place in two stages. (1) Ionizing radiation energy, particularly γ, β or X-ray energy at keV or MeV level loses energy just at eV level while passing through a core- Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation (Bharat radiation) with the same energy at eV level but higher than that of UV or EUV that the source emits. (2) In turn, the Bharat energy generates UV dominant atomic spectrum on valence excitation. . Core- Coulomb interaction of γ, β or X-ray is the notable feature in this atomic phenomenon. This phenomenon has certain distinct features that makes it entirely different from all other phenomena known in literature. In Photo electric effect, a gamma or X-ray directly hits a core electron and gives away all its energy to the electron so as to escape from the atom. In Compton Effect, gamma or X-ray goes little away from a core electron, and shares only part of its energy with the electron yet able to knock it out from the atom. As a result, both the scattered gamma or X-ray and the Compton electron escape from the atom. In the current phenomenon, γ, β or X-ray passes through core Coulomb space but more away from core electron than in the case of Compton Effect. As a result, γ, β or X-ray undergoes a very little loss of energy at eV level while passing through core Coulomb space, so that the core electron gets unaffected. As explained already, the loss of energy is released as an electromagnetic radiation termed Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Therefore, γ, β or X-ray with a very little loss of energy at eV level is successively followed by two more emissions namely the Bharat Radiation with eV energy and UV dominant optical radiation from one and the same excited atom. Two years were lasted in conceiving this phenomenon. This is how scientific discoveries take years of hard work, when the researcher remains uncertain how long it takes to resolve a puzzling issue. 7.1. Tritium is a source of Bharat Radiation The fact that 3 H (Tritium) did not show any optical emission validates the atomic phenomenon [1]. The reason being 3 H has only one electron, which is in K-shell. Passage of β-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. It is to note that Padmanabha Rao Effect causes UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources having at least two filled orbits. However, tritium has only filled orbit. In the absence of an electron in L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3 H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Unlike all other radioisotopes tested, 3 H proved to be an ideal source of Bharat radiation in the absence of any optical emission. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission. 8. Bharat Radiation and UV cause skin dose to Hospital patients exposed to X-rays or gamma rays The current study suggests that the radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation dose to patients. Since Bharat Radiation and UV follow X-rays according to the current study, Bharat Radiation and UV from diagnostic X-ray tubes and CT scanners may subject the patients to higher skin dose than previously thought [10]. Bharat Radiation, UV emission following γ-rays from metal 60 Co may also contribute for the skin erythema noticed in cancer patients during 60 Co Teletherapy treatment [11]. By introducing a very thin Aluminum sheet or some other thick material between X-ray or gamma source and the patient helps in cutting off these radiations and thus the extra skin dose. REFERENCES 1. Padmanabha Rao MA, UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Braz. J. Phy., 40, no 1, 38-46, 2010. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332010000100007 2. Padmanabha Rao MA. Atomic emission of light from sources of ionizing radiation by a new phenomenon, Technical Report No: DLJ/ IL/ 97/ 7 of the Defence Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India) Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India), 1997, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/technicalreport.html 3. Padmanabha Rao MA. Light emission observed from ionizing radiation sources by an atomic phenomenon, National Symposium on Contemporary Physics, November 6-8, 1997, Kolkata, India, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/kolkata.html 4. Padmanabha Rao MA. Radioisotopes and X-ray sources emit fluorescent light by an atomic phenomenon, Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on Radiation Physics, (Eds. P K Bhatnagar et al), Jodhpur 342011, India, pp 273-276, 1998 http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/jodhpur1998.html The schematic diagram explains how 0.1221 MeV γ- ray in excited 57 Co atom of metal 57 Co source generates Bharat Radiation while passing through core Coulomb space, which in turn generates UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation by Padmanabha Rao Effect [1]. UV dominant optical emission takes place from a salt such as Rubidium salt, when an incident γ or X-ray knocks away a K shell electron in Rb atom by photo electric effect. The resulting K X-ray, and L X-ray can generate Bharat Radiation photons while passing through Coulomb space of M shell electrons. Next, the Bharat Radiation photons generate UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page8 as free atoms, the new ‘atomic state of solids’ that exists at room temperature itself is responsible for the typical spectra observed. Understandably, environment of excited atoms in solid radioisotopes and XRF sources that cause UV dominant optical spectra differs much from that of thermally excited atoms in gaseous phase causing the basic atomic spectra. 7. Discovery 6: NEW ATOMIC PHENOMENON (PADMANABHA RAO EFFECT) The previously unknown atomic phenomenon reportedly taking place in radioisotopes and XRF sources explains how γ, β or X-ray successively generates Bharat radiation (first generation), which in turn the UV dominant optical emission (second generation) within the same excited atom [1]. This phenomenon is known as Padmanabha Rao Effect [5-7]. The phenomenon takes place in two stages. (1) Ionizing radiation energy, particularly γ, β or X-ray energy at keV or MeV level loses energy just at eV level while passing through a core- Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation (Bharat radiation) with the same energy at eV level but higher than that of UV or EUV that the source emits. (2) In turn, the Bharat energy generates UV dominant atomic spectrum on valence excitation. . Core- Coulomb interaction of γ, β or X-ray is the notable feature in this atomic phenomenon. This phenomenon has certain distinct features that makes it entirely different from all other phenomena known in literature. In Photo electric effect, a gamma or X-ray directly hits a core electron and gives away all its energy to the electron so as to escape from the atom. In Compton Effect, gamma or X-ray goes little away from a core electron, and shares only part of its energy with the electron yet able to knock it out from the atom. As a result, both the scattered gamma or X-ray and the Compton electron escape from the atom. In the current phenomenon, γ, β or X-ray passes through core Coulomb space but more away from core electron than in the case of Compton Effect. As a result, γ, β or X-ray undergoes a very little loss of energy at eV level while passing through core Coulomb space, so that the core electron gets unaffected. As explained already, the loss of energy is released as an electromagnetic radiation termed Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Therefore, γ, β or X-ray with a very little loss of energy at eV level is successively followed by two more emissions namely the Bharat Radiation with eV energy and UV dominant optical radiation from one and the same excited atom. Two years were lasted in conceiving this phenomenon. This is how scientific discoveries take years of hard work, when the researcher remains uncertain how long it takes to resolve a puzzling issue. 7.1. Tritium is a source of Bharat Radiation The fact that 3 H (Tritium) did not show any optical emission validates the atomic phenomenon [1]. The reason being 3 H has only one electron, which is in K-shell. Passage of β-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. It is to note that Padmanabha Rao Effect causes UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources having at least two filled orbits. However, tritium has only filled orbit. In the absence of an electron in L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3 H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Unlike all other radioisotopes tested, 3 H proved to be an ideal source of Bharat radiation in the absence of any optical emission. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission. 8. Bharat Radiation and UV cause skin dose to Hospital patients exposed to X-rays or gamma rays The current study suggests that the radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation dose to patients. Since Bharat Radiation and UV follow X-rays according to the current study, Bharat Radiation and UV from diagnostic X-ray tubes and CT scanners may subject the patients to higher skin dose than previously thought [10]. Bharat Radiation, UV emission following γ-rays from metal 60 Co may also contribute for the skin erythema noticed in cancer patients during 60 Co Teletherapy treatment [11]. By introducing a very thin Aluminum sheet or some other thick material between X-ray or gamma source and the patient helps in cutting off these radiations and thus the extra skin dose. REFERENCES 1. Padmanabha Rao MA, UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Braz. J. Phy., 40, no 1, 38-46, 2010. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332010000100007 2. Padmanabha Rao MA. Atomic emission of light from sources of ionizing radiation by a new phenomenon, Technical Report No: DLJ/ IL/ 97/ 7 of the Defence Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India) Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India), 1997, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/technicalreport.html 3. Padmanabha Rao MA. Light emission observed from ionizing radiation sources by an atomic phenomenon, National Symposium on Contemporary Physics, November 6-8, 1997, Kolkata, India, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/kolkata.html 4. Padmanabha Rao MA. Radioisotopes and X-ray sources emit fluorescent light by an atomic phenomenon, Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on Radiation Physics, (Eds. P K Bhatnagar et al), Jodhpur 342011, India, pp 273-276, 1998 http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/jodhpur1998.html The schematic diagram explains how 0.1221 MeV γ- ray in excited 57 Co atom of metal 57 Co source generates Bharat Radiation while passing through core Coulomb space, which in turn generates UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation by Padmanabha Rao Effect [1]. UV dominant optical emission takes place from a salt such as Rubidium salt, when an incident γ or X-ray knocks away a K shell electron in Rb atom by photo electric effect. The resulting K X-ray, and L X-ray can generate Bharat Radiation photons while passing through Coulomb space of M shell electrons. Next, the Bharat Radiation photons generate UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page8 as free atoms, the new ‘atomic state of solids’ that exists at room temperature itself is responsible for the typical spectra observed. Understandably, environment of excited atoms in solid radioisotopes and XRF sources that cause UV dominant optical spectra differs much from that of thermally excited atoms in gaseous phase causing the basic atomic spectra. 7. Discovery 6: NEW ATOMIC PHENOMENON (PADMANABHA RAO EFFECT) The previously unknown atomic phenomenon reportedly taking place in radioisotopes and XRF sources explains how γ, β or X-ray successively generates Bharat radiation (first generation), which in turn the UV dominant optical emission (second generation) within the same excited atom [1]. This phenomenon is known as Padmanabha Rao Effect [5-7]. The phenomenon takes place in two stages. (1) Ionizing radiation energy, particularly γ, β or X-ray energy at keV or MeV level loses energy just at eV level while passing through a core- Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation (Bharat radiation) with the same energy at eV level but higher than that of UV or EUV that the source emits. (2) In turn, the Bharat energy generates UV dominant atomic spectrum on valence excitation. . Core- Coulomb interaction of γ, β or X-ray is the notable feature in this atomic phenomenon. This phenomenon has certain distinct features that makes it entirely different from all other phenomena known in literature. In Photo electric effect, a gamma or X-ray directly hits a core electron and gives away all its energy to the electron so as to escape from the atom. In Compton Effect, gamma or X-ray goes little away from a core electron, and shares only part of its energy with the electron yet able to knock it out from the atom. As a result, both the scattered gamma or X-ray and the Compton electron escape from the atom. In the current phenomenon, γ, β or X-ray passes through core Coulomb space but more away from core electron than in the case of Compton Effect. As a result, γ, β or X-ray undergoes a very little loss of energy at eV level while passing through core Coulomb space, so that the core electron gets unaffected. As explained already, the loss of energy is released as an electromagnetic radiation termed Bharat Radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation. Therefore, γ, β or X-ray with a very little loss of energy at eV level is successively followed by two more emissions namely the Bharat Radiation with eV energy and UV dominant optical radiation from one and the same excited atom. Two years were lasted in conceiving this phenomenon. This is how scientific discoveries take years of hard work, when the researcher remains uncertain how long it takes to resolve a puzzling issue. 7.1. Tritium is a source of Bharat Radiation The fact that 3 H (Tritium) did not show any optical emission validates the atomic phenomenon [1]. The reason being 3 H has only one electron, which is in K-shell. Passage of β-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. It is to note that Padmanabha Rao Effect causes UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources having at least two filled orbits. However, tritium has only filled orbit. In the absence of an electron in L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3 H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Unlike all other radioisotopes tested, 3 H proved to be an ideal source of Bharat radiation in the absence of any optical emission. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission. 8. Bharat Radiation and UV cause skin dose to Hospital patients exposed to X-rays or gamma rays The current study suggests that the radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation dose to patients. Since Bharat Radiation and UV follow X-rays according to the current study, Bharat Radiation and UV from diagnostic X-ray tubes and CT scanners may subject the patients to higher skin dose than previously thought [10]. Bharat Radiation, UV emission following γ-rays from metal 60 Co may also contribute for the skin erythema noticed in cancer patients during 60 Co Teletherapy treatment [11]. By introducing a very thin Aluminum sheet or some other thick material between X-ray or gamma source and the patient helps in cutting off these radiations and thus the extra skin dose. REFERENCES 1. Padmanabha Rao MA, UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Braz. J. Phy., 40, no 1, 38-46, 2010. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332010000100007 2. Padmanabha Rao MA. Atomic emission of light from sources of ionizing radiation by a new phenomenon, Technical Report No: DLJ/ IL/ 97/ 7 of the Defence Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India) Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India), 1997, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/technicalreport.html 3. Padmanabha Rao MA. Light emission observed from ionizing radiation sources by an atomic phenomenon, National Symposium on Contemporary Physics, November 6-8, 1997, Kolkata, India, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/kolkata.html 4. Padmanabha Rao MA. Radioisotopes and X-ray sources emit fluorescent light by an atomic phenomenon, Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on Radiation Physics, (Eds. P K Bhatnagar et al), Jodhpur 342011, India, pp 273-276, 1998 http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/jodhpur1998.html The schematic diagram explains how 0.1221 MeV γ- ray in excited 57 Co atom of metal 57 Co source generates Bharat Radiation while passing through core Coulomb space, which in turn generates UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation by Padmanabha Rao Effect [1]. UV dominant optical emission takes place from a salt such as Rubidium salt, when an incident γ or X-ray knocks away a K shell electron in Rb atom by photo electric effect. The resulting K X-ray, and L X-ray can generate Bharat Radiation photons while passing through Coulomb space of M shell electrons. Next, the Bharat Radiation photons generate UV dominant optical emission on valence excitation.
  • 5. Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page9 5. Padmanabha Rao MA. X-ray source emits not only X-rays but also low energy electromagnetic radiation. Presented in 1998 Symposium on Radiation Measurements and Applications, Ninth in a series, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. Abstract 3PW26, 1998, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/michigan1998.html 6. Padmanabha Rao MA. Possible biological effects by UV radiation newly detected from internally administered radioisotopes. in Proceedings of the Symposium on Low Level Electromagnetic Phenomena in Biological Systems (BIOSYS-’99), edited by Jitendra Behari p.68. 1999, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/uvdosimetry.html 7. Padmanabha Rao MA, Discovery of light emission from XRF sources, Presented in 50th Annual Denver Conference, Steamboat Springs, Colorado State, U.S.A., Abstract F-01, p.124, 2001,. http://www.dxcicdd.com/01/pdf/F-01.pdf 8. Padmanabha Rao MA. Room temperature atomic spectra from solid radioisotopes and XRF sources, Presented in 34 Conference of European Group for Atomic Spectroscopy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Editor: K.Blagoev, Institute of Sold State Physics, Oral Paper F2-4, p.103, 2002, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/egas34.html 9. Padmanabha Rao MA, (Invited Paper) Solar X-rays, gamma rays and electrons cause EUV by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Ecology and Nature (HEN2008), Moscow-Ples, Russia, edited by Vladimir V.Zaitsev (Moscow Scientific and industrial Association “Radon”) p.45, 2008. http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/Solarfission.html 10. Radiation risks of CT scans need to be taught to patients. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/radiation-risks-ct-scans-taught-patients.html 11. Cobalt- 60 more unsafe than thought. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/COBALT-+60+MORE+UNSAFE+THAN+THOUGHT.-a0228856095 12. Padmanabha Rao MA, .Discovery of Sun’s Bharat Radiation emission causing Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) and UV dominant optical radiation, IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP), e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 3, Issue 2, PP 56-60, Mar. - Apr. 2013, http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/papers/Vol3-issue2/H0325660.pdf 13. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1903, Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Marie Curie: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1903/becquerel-bio.html 14. The Discovery of Radioactivity: http://www.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/4.html 15. Photos of Nobel Laureates are taken from Internet such as : http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/curie/ Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page9 5. Padmanabha Rao MA. X-ray source emits not only X-rays but also low energy electromagnetic radiation. Presented in 1998 Symposium on Radiation Measurements and Applications, Ninth in a series, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. Abstract 3PW26, 1998, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/michigan1998.html 6. Padmanabha Rao MA. Possible biological effects by UV radiation newly detected from internally administered radioisotopes. in Proceedings of the Symposium on Low Level Electromagnetic Phenomena in Biological Systems (BIOSYS-’99), edited by Jitendra Behari p.68. 1999, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/uvdosimetry.html 7. Padmanabha Rao MA, Discovery of light emission from XRF sources, Presented in 50th Annual Denver Conference, Steamboat Springs, Colorado State, U.S.A., Abstract F-01, p.124, 2001,. http://www.dxcicdd.com/01/pdf/F-01.pdf 8. Padmanabha Rao MA. Room temperature atomic spectra from solid radioisotopes and XRF sources, Presented in 34 Conference of European Group for Atomic Spectroscopy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Editor: K.Blagoev, Institute of Sold State Physics, Oral Paper F2-4, p.103, 2002, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/egas34.html 9. Padmanabha Rao MA, (Invited Paper) Solar X-rays, gamma rays and electrons cause EUV by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Ecology and Nature (HEN2008), Moscow-Ples, Russia, edited by Vladimir V.Zaitsev (Moscow Scientific and industrial Association “Radon”) p.45, 2008. http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/Solarfission.html 10. Radiation risks of CT scans need to be taught to patients. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/radiation-risks-ct-scans-taught-patients.html 11. Cobalt- 60 more unsafe than thought. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/COBALT-+60+MORE+UNSAFE+THAN+THOUGHT.-a0228856095 12. Padmanabha Rao MA, .Discovery of Sun’s Bharat Radiation emission causing Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) and UV dominant optical radiation, IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP), e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 3, Issue 2, PP 56-60, Mar. - Apr. 2013, http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/papers/Vol3-issue2/H0325660.pdf 13. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1903, Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Marie Curie: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1903/becquerel-bio.html 14. The Discovery of Radioactivity: http://www.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/4.html 15. Photos of Nobel Laureates are taken from Internet such as : http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/curie/ Discovery • Letters • Physics Padmanabha Rao, Bharat radiation and UV dominant optical radiation emissions discovered from radioisotopes and XRF (X-ray fluorescent) sources, Discovery, 2013, 4(10), 05-09, www.discovery.org.in http://www.discovery.org.in/d.htm © 2013 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Page9 5. Padmanabha Rao MA. X-ray source emits not only X-rays but also low energy electromagnetic radiation. Presented in 1998 Symposium on Radiation Measurements and Applications, Ninth in a series, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. Abstract 3PW26, 1998, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/michigan1998.html 6. Padmanabha Rao MA. Possible biological effects by UV radiation newly detected from internally administered radioisotopes. in Proceedings of the Symposium on Low Level Electromagnetic Phenomena in Biological Systems (BIOSYS-’99), edited by Jitendra Behari p.68. 1999, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/uvdosimetry.html 7. Padmanabha Rao MA, Discovery of light emission from XRF sources, Presented in 50th Annual Denver Conference, Steamboat Springs, Colorado State, U.S.A., Abstract F-01, p.124, 2001,. http://www.dxcicdd.com/01/pdf/F-01.pdf 8. Padmanabha Rao MA. Room temperature atomic spectra from solid radioisotopes and XRF sources, Presented in 34 Conference of European Group for Atomic Spectroscopy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Editor: K.Blagoev, Institute of Sold State Physics, Oral Paper F2-4, p.103, 2002, http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/egas34.html 9. Padmanabha Rao MA, (Invited Paper) Solar X-rays, gamma rays and electrons cause EUV by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Ecology and Nature (HEN2008), Moscow-Ples, Russia, edited by Vladimir V.Zaitsev (Moscow Scientific and industrial Association “Radon”) p.45, 2008. http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/Solarfission.html 10. Radiation risks of CT scans need to be taught to patients. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/radiation-risks-ct-scans-taught-patients.html 11. Cobalt- 60 more unsafe than thought. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/COBALT-+60+MORE+UNSAFE+THAN+THOUGHT.-a0228856095 12. Padmanabha Rao MA, .Discovery of Sun’s Bharat Radiation emission causing Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) and UV dominant optical radiation, IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP), e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 3, Issue 2, PP 56-60, Mar. - Apr. 2013, http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/papers/Vol3-issue2/H0325660.pdf 13. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1903, Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Marie Curie: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1903/becquerel-bio.html 14. The Discovery of Radioactivity: http://www.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/4.html 15. Photos of Nobel Laureates are taken from Internet such as : http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/curie/