SlideShare a Scribd company logo
LETTER                                                                                                                                                               doi:10.1038/nature12050




A dust-obscured massive maximum-starburst
galaxy at a redshift of 6.34
Dominik A. Riechers1,2, C. M. Bradford1,3, D. L. Clements4, C. D. Dowell1,3, I. Perez-Fournon5,6, R. J. Ivison7,8, C. Bridge1,
                                                                                    ´
A. Conley9, Hai Fu10, J. D. Vieira1, J. Wardlow10, J. Calanog10, A. Cooray1,10, P. Hurley11, R. Neri12, J. Kamenetzky13, J. E. Aguirre14,
B. Altieri15, V. Arumugam8, D. J. Benford16, M. Bethermin17,18, J. Bock1,3, D. Burgarella19, A. Cabrera-Lavers5,6,20, S. C. Chapman21,
                                                   ´
P. Cox12, J. S. Dunlop8, L. Earle9, D. Farrah22, P. Ferrero5,6, A. Franceschini23, R. Gavazzi24, J. Glenn9,13, E. A. Gonzalez Solares21,
M. A. Gurwell25, M. Halpern26, E. Hatziminaoglou27, A. Hyde4, E. Ibar7, A. Kovacs1,28, M. Krips12, R. E. Lupu14, P. R. Maloney9,
                                                                                    ´
P. Martinez-Navajas5,6, H. Matsuhara29, E. J. Murphy1,30, B. J. Naylor3, H. T. Nguyen1,3, S. J. Oliver11, A. Omont24, M. J. Page31,
G. Petitpas25, N. Rangwala13, I. G. Roseboom8,11, D. Scott26, A. J. Smith11, J. G. Staguhn16,32, A. Streblyanska5,6, A. P. Thomson8,
I. Valtchanov15, M. Viero1, L. Wang11, M. Zemcov1,3 & J. Zmuidzinas1,3


Massive present-day early-type (elliptical and lenticular) galaxies                                  of number counts in the Herschel/SPIRE bands suggest a space
probably gained the bulk of their stellar mass and heavy elements                                    density of massive starburst galaxies at z . 6 with S500mm . 30 mJy
through intense, dust-enshrouded starbursts—that is, increased                                       of 0.014 deg22 (ref. 7).
rates of star formation—in the most massive dark-matter haloes                                          To understand the nature of galaxies selected by this technique, we
at early epochs. However, it remains unknown how soon after the                                      have obtained full frequency scans of the 3-mm and 1-mm bands
Big Bang massive starburst progenitors exist. The measured red-                                      towards HFLS 3 (also known as 1HERMES S350 J170647.81584623;
shift (z) distribution of dusty, massive starbursts has long been                                    S500mm/S350mm 5 1.45), the brightest candidate discovered in our study.
suspected to be biased low in z owing to selection effects1, as con-                                 These observations, augmented by selected follow-up over a broader
firmed by recent findings of systems with redshifts as high as 5                                     wavelength range, unambiguously determine the galaxy redshift to be
(refs 2–4). Here we report the identification of a massive starburst                                 z 5 6.3369 6 0.0009 based on a suite of 7 CO lines, 7 H2O lines, and
galaxy at z 5 6.34 through a submillimetre colour-selection tech-                                    OH, OH1, H2O1, NH3, [C I] and [C II] lines detected in emission and
nique. We unambiguously determined the redshift from a suite of                                      absorption (Fig. 1). At this redshift, the Universe was just 880 million
molecular and atomic fine-structure cooling lines. These measure-                                    years old (or one-sixteenth of its present age), and 10 on the sky corre-
ments reveal a hundred billion solar masses of highly excited,                                       sponds to a physical scale of 5.6 kpc. Further observations from optical
chemically evolved interstellar medium in this galaxy, which con-                                    to radio wavelengths reveal strong continuum emission over virtually
stitutes at least 40 per cent of the baryonic mass. A ‘maximum                                       the entire wavelength range between 2.2 mm and 20 cm, with no
starburst’ converts the gas into stars at a rate more than 2,000 times                               detected emission shortward of 1 mm (see Supplementary Informa-
that of the Milky Way, a rate among the highest observed at any                                      tion section 2 and Supplementary Figs 1–11 for additional details).
epoch. Despite the overall downturn in cosmic star formation                                            HFLS 3 hosts an intense starburst. The 870-mm flux of HFLS 3 is
towards the highest redshifts5, it seems that environments mature                                    .3.5 times higher than those of the brightest high-redshift starbursts
enough to form the most massive, intense starbursts existed at least                                 in a 0.25-deg2 region containing the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF)8.
as early as 880 million years after the Big Bang.                                                    From the continuum spectral energy distribution (Fig. 2), we find that
   We have searched 21 deg2 of the Herschel/SPIRE data of the                                        the far-infrared (FIR) luminosity LFIR and inferred star formation rate
HerMES blank field survey6 at wavelengths 250–500 mm for ‘ultra-                                     (SFR) of 2,900 Msun yr21 of HFLS 3 (where Msun is the solar mass) are 15–
red’ sources with flux densities S250mm , S350mm , S500mm and S500mm/                                20 times those of the prototypical local ultra-luminous starburst Arp 220,
S350mm . 1.3, that is, galaxies that are significantly redder (and thus,                             and .2,000 times those of the Milky Way (Table 1 and Supplementary
potentially at higher redshift) than massive starbursts discovered thus                              Information section 3). The SFR of HFLS 3 alone corresponds to ,4.5
far. This selection yields five candidate ultra-red sources down to a flux                           times the ultraviolet-based SFR of all z 5 5.5–6.5 star-forming galaxies in
limit of 30 mJy at 500 mm (.5s and above the confusion noise; see                                    the HUDF combined9, but the rarity and dust obscuration of ultra-red
Supplementary Information section 1 for additional details), corres-                                 sources like HFLS 3 implies that they do not dominate the ultraviolet
ponding to a source density of #0.24 deg22. For comparison, models                                   photon density needed to reionize the Universe10.
1
 California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 249-17, Pasadena, California 91125, USA. 2Cornell University, 220 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. 3Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, USA. 4Astrophysics Group, Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 5Instituto
de Astrofisica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. 6Departamento de Astrofisica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. 7UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal
Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK. 8Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK. 9Center for Astrophysics and Space
Astronomy 389-UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. 10Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA. 11Astronomy Centre,
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK. 12Institut de RadioAstronomie Millimetrique, 300 Rue de la Piscine, Domaine Universitaire, F-38406 Saint Martin
d’Heres, France. 13Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, CASA 389-UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. 14Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. 15Herschel Science Centre, European Space Astronomy Centre, Villanueva de la Canada, 28691 Madrid, Spain. 16Observational Cosmology
                                                                                                                                           ˜
Laboratory, Code 665, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA. 17Laboratoire AIM-Paris-Saclay, CEA/DSM/Irfu – CNRS – Universite Paris Diderot, CEA Saclay, Point courrier
                                                                                                                                                               ´
131, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 18Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale (IAS), Ba  ˆtiment 121, Universite Paris-Sud 11 and CNRS, UMR 8617, F-91405 Orsay, France. 19Aix-Marseille Universite, CNRS,
                                                                                                                                                                                             ´
Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille, UMR7326, F-13388 Marseille, France. 20Grantecan S.A., Centro de Astrofısica de La Palma, Cuesta de San Jose, E-38712 Brena Baja, La Palma, Spain. 21Institute
                                                                                                                     ´
                                                                                       22                                                                     23
of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK. Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA. Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia,
Universita di Padova, vicolo Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova, Italy. 24Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, 98bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France. 25Harvard-
         `
Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. 26Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada. 27ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei Munchen, Germany. 28Institute for Astrophysics, University of Minnesota, 116 Church Street
                                                                                                                  ¨
Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. 29Institute for Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace and Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan. 30Infrared Processing
and Analysis Center, MS 100-22, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA. 31Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St Mary, Dorking RH5 6NT,
UK. 32Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.


                                                                                                                                    1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 6 | N AT U R E | 3 2 9
                                                           ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
RESEARCH LETTER

               a                      30


                                                          HFLS3 (z=6.3369)                                                                                                                                                                                                                   [C II]             [O I]

                                      25                  Arp 220 (z=0.0181)
                                                          Unlabelled lines, H2O
                                               1.0                                                                                                                                                                             [N II]                                                  OH
                                                     b                                                     c                                d
                                                                                                                                       CO                                                                                                          H2O
                                      20
                                                                                                       CO
            Flux density (mJy)




                                               0.5

                                                         CO
                                      15

                                               0.0
                                                                        150                  200               250               300       35 0
                                                                                                                                                                                          H 2O
                                      10                                                                                                                                                         H2O                                                                                                  NH
                                                                                                                                                                                 CO
                                                                                                                                                                           H2O
                                                                                                                                                                  CO                                                                                                          NH3
                                                                                                           CO                                       H2O OH+
                                          5                                   CO                     H2O
                                                                                                                     [C I]
                                                                                          H2O+
                                                   CO



                                          0
                                                                                 e               f               g                                     h         ij         k         l                                                                                        m        n         o

                                                     600                                                   800                                        1,000                               1,200                        1,400                   1,600                           1,800                      2,000             2,200
                                                                                                                                                                       νrest (GHz)
                                 b                                      c                                            d                                      e                                          f                                      g                                                       h
                                                                  0.8                                                                                 6.0 CO(J=6–5)
          0.4                    CO(J=1–0)                                  CO(J=2–1)                                 CO(J=3–2)                                                                        H2O(211–202)                     6.0    CO(J=7–6) and [C I]                          6.0       H2O(202–111)
                                                                                                           1.2                                                                                   4.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       H2O+H2O+
                                                                                                                                                      4.0
          0.2                                                     0.4                                      0.8                                                                                                                          4.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            4.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                 2.0
                                                                                                                                                      2.0
          0.0                                                                                              0.4                                                                                                                          2.0
                                                                  0.0                                                                                                                                                                                                                       2.0
                                                                                                                                                      0.0                                        0.0
         –0.2                                                                                              0.0                                                                                                                          0.0
                                     00


                                               0


                                                          0




                                                                         00

                                                                         00

                                                                                                0

                                                                                               0

                                                                                                0

                                                                                                               00

                                                                                                                                  0

                                                                                                                                  0

                                                                                                                                  0

                                                                                                                                  0



                                                                                                                                                       –2 0
                                                                                                                                                             00

                                                                                                                                                                                 0

                                                                                                                                                                                 0

                                                                                                                                                                                  0



                                                                                                                                                                                                        00



                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0


                                                                                                                                                                                                                              0



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                00


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           00


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        0


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0
                                                     00




                                                                                             00

                                                                                             00




                                                                                                                               00

                                                                                                                               00

                                                                                                                                00



                                                                                                                                                            0




                                                                                                                                                                              00

                                                                                                                                                                               00




                                                                                                                                                                                                                            00




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   00




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             00
                                 ,0




                                                                      ,0

                                                                       ,0




                                                                                                             ,0




                                                                                                                                                         ,0

                                                                                                                                                          ,0




                                                                                                                                                                                                       ,0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         ,0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ,0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            ,0


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ,0
                                                     2,




                                                                                          2,

                                                                                          4,




                                                                                                                             2,

                                                                                                                             4,

                                                                                                                             6,




                                                                                                                                                                                2,

                                                                                                                                                                            4,




                                                                                                                                                                                                                         5,




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      2,

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  4,




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2,
                       –2




                                                                    –4

                                                                    –2




                                                                                                           –2




                                                                                                                                                       –4




                                                                                                                                                                                                   –5




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        –4

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               –2




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           –4


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      –2
                                 i                                      j                                            k                                15
                                                                                                                                                            l                                          m                                      n                                             60
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      o
                                                                  8.0 OH+(1 –0 )                           8.0 H O(3 –3 )                                                                                                                     OH(2Π1/2 J=3/2–1/2)
          8.0                    CO(J=9–8)                                 12 12                                2   12 03                                    CO(J=10–9)                          17        NH3(3,K)a–(2,K)s                                                                            [C II](2P3/2–2P1/2)
                                                                              CO(J=9–8)                                                                                                                                                 25           [–/+]            [+/–]
                                                                                                                                                             H2O(321–312)                                            K=2,1,0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    CO(J=16–15)
                                                                                                                                                                                                 16                                                                                         40
          6.0                                                     6.0                            OH+       6.0
                                                         OH+                                                                                          10
                                                                                                                                                                                                 15                                     20
          4.0                                                     4.0                                      4.0                                                                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                                                                                                 14
                                                                                                                                                       5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        15
          2.0                                                                                              2.0                                                                                   13
                                                                  2.0                                                                                                                                                                                                                        0
                            00

                                          00


                                                     0

                                                              0




                                                                            00

                                                                                        00


                                                                                                 0



                                                                                                               00


                                                                                                                             0


                                                                                                                                       0


                                                                                                                                                0



                                                                                                                                                            00


                                                                                                                                                                       00


                                                                                                                                                                                 0




                                                                                                                                                                                                        00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                  00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0
                                                                                                                                                                                            0
                                                          00




                                                                                                                                  00


                                                                                                                                            00




                                                                                                                                                                                                                              00




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  00




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   00

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            00
                                                                                                                                                                                          00
                   ,0

                                      ,0




                                                                          ,0

                                                                                     ,0




                                                                                                           ,0




                                                                                                                                                           ,0


                                                                                                                                                                      ,0




                                                                                                                                                                                                       ,0

                                                                                                                                                                                                              ,0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               ,0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ,0
                                                         2,




                                                                                                                                 2,


                                                                                                                                           4,




                                                                                                                                                                                                                            1,




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      1,

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               2,




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   1,

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2,
                                                                                                                                                                                      2,
           –4

                                     –2




                                                                        –4

                                                                                   –2




                                                                                                       –2




                                                                                                                                                       –4


                                                                                                                                                                 –2




                                                                                                                                                                                                   –2

                                                                                                                                                                                                             –1




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              –1




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                –1
                                                                                                                                                           Velocity offset (km s–1)

Figure 1 | Redshift identification through molecular and atomic                                                                                                             (CARMA) not shown in a. The line profiles are typically asymmetric relative to
spectroscopy of HFLS 3. a, Black trace, wide-band spectroscopy in the                                                                                                       single Gaussian fits, indicating the presence of two principal velocity
observed-frame 19–0.95-mm (histogram; rest-frame 2,600–130 mm)                                                                                                              components at redshifts of 6.3335 and 6.3427. The implied CO, [C I] and [C II]
wavelength range with CARMA (3 mm; ‘blind’ frequency scan of the full band),                                                                                                line luminosities are respectively (5.08 6 0.45) 3 106 Lsun,
the PdBI (2 mm), the JVLA (19–6 mm) and CSO/Z-spec (1 mm; instantaneous                                                                                                     (3.0 6 1.9) 3 108 Lsun and (1.55 6 0.32) 3 1010 Lsun. Strong rest-frame
coverage). (CARMA, Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave                                                                                                           submillimetre to FIR continuum emission is detected over virtually the entire
Astronomy; PdBI, Plateau de Bure Interferometer; JVLA, Jansky Very Large                                                                                                    wavelength range. For comparison, the Herschel/SPIRE spectrum of the nearby
Array; and CSO, Caltech Submillimeter Observatory.) This uniquely                                                                                                           ultra-luminous infrared galaxy Arp 22020 is overplotted in grey (a). Lines
determines the redshift of HFLS 3 to be z 5 6.3369 based on the detection of a                                                                                              labelled in italic are tentative detections or upper limits (see Supplementary
series of H2O, CO, OH, OH1, NH3, [C I] and [C II] emission and absorption                                                                                                   Table 2). Most of the bright spectral features detected in Arp 22020,21 are also
lines. b–o, Detailed profiles of detected lines (histograms; rest frequencies are                                                                                           detected in HFLS 3 (in spectral regions not blocked by the terrestrial
indicated by corresponding letters in a). 1-mm lines (m–o) are deeper,                                                                                                      atmosphere). See Supplementary Information sections 2–4 for more details.
interferometric confirmation observations for NH3, OH (both PdBI) and [C II]

   HFLS 3 is a massive, gas-rich galaxy. From the spectral energy distri-                                                                                                   gas mass fraction in galaxies is a measure of the relative depletion and
bution and the intensity of the CO and [C II] emission, we find a dust                                                                                                      replenishment of molecular gas, and is expected to be a function of halo
mass of Md 5 1.3 3 109 Msun and total molecular and atomic gas masses                                                                                                       mass and redshift from simulations14. In HFLS 3, we find a high gas mass
of respectively Mgas 5 1.0 3 1011 Msun and MHI 5 2.0 3 1010 Msun. These                                                                                                     fraction of fgas 5 Mgas/Mdyn < 40%, comparable to what is found in sub-
masses are 15–20 times those of Arp 220, and correspond to a gas-to-                                                                                                        millimetre-selected starbursts and massive star-forming galaxies at z < 2
dust ratio of ,80 and a gas depletion timescale of Mgas/SFR < 36 Myr.                                                                                                       (refs 15, 16), but ,3 times higher than in nearby ultra-luminous infrared
These values are comparable to lower-redshift submillimetre-selected                                                                                                        galaxies (ULIRGs) like Arp 220, and .30 times higher than in the Milky
starbursts11,12. From the [C I] luminosity, we find an atomic carbon mass                                                                                                   Way. From population synthesis modelling, we find a stellar mass of
of 4.5 3 107 Msun. At the current SFR of HFLS 3, this level of carbon                                                                                                       M* 5 3.7 3 1010 Msun, comparable to that of Arp 220 and about half that
enrichment could have been achieved through supernovae on a timescale                                                                                                       of the Milky Way. This suggests that at most ,40% of Mdyn within the
of ,107 yr (ref. 13). The profiles of the molecular and atomic emission                                                                                                     radius of the gas reservoir is due to dark matter. With up to ,1011 Msun of
lines typically show two velocity components (Fig. 1 and Supplementary                                                                                                      dark matter within 3.4 kpc, HFLS 3 is likely to reside in a dark-matter halo
Figs 5 and 7). The gas is distributed over a region of 1.7 kpc radius with a                                                                                                massive enough to grow a present-day galaxy cluster17. The efficiency
high velocity gradient and dispersion (Fig. 3). This suggests a dispersion-                                                                                                 of star formation is given by e 5 tdyn 3 SFR/Mgas, where tdyn 5 (r3/
dominated galaxy with a dynamical mass of Mdyn 5 2.7 3 1011 Msun. The                                                                                                       (2GM))1/2 is the dynamical (or free-fall) time, r is the source radius,
3 3 0 | N AT U R E | VO L 4 9 6 | 1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3
                                                                                                       ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
LETTER RESEARCH

     a                                                   νrest (GHz)                                                            b
                        107         106          105          104          103         102          101
               102                                                                                                                          4
                                                                                                            12
                         HFLS3                                                                                                                                                                                              Arp220
                                                                                                                                                              S350μm > S250μm
                                    MBB                                                                                                                                                                                        M82
               101                  Arp220                                                                  14                                                                                           8                    HR10
                                    M8 2                                                                                                                                                                                    Eyelash
                                    HR10                                                                                                    3                                                                 7
                                                                                                            16
               100                  Eyelash




                                                                                                                          S500μm / S350μm
                                                                                                            18                                                                                                         6
  Flux (mJy)




               10–1




                                                                                                                 AB mag
                                                                                                            20                              2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   5
               10–2                                                                                                                                                                   7      8
                                                                                                            22                                                                6                              HFLS3 z=6.34
                                                                                                                                                                          5                                                  S500μm > 1.3 S350μm
                                                                                                                                                                      4
                                                                                                                                                                  3                                  4
               10–3                                                                                         24                                                                                   HLock102 z=5.29             S500μm > S350μm
                                                                                                                                                              2
                                                                                                                                            1        z=1
                                                                                                                                                                                  3       HLS A773 z=5.24
                                                         1′
                                                                                                            26                                                                HFLS1 z=4.29
               10–4                                                                                                                                           2                 HATLAS ID141 z=4.24
                                                                                                                                                    z=1                           HFLS5 z=4.44
                                                        250 μm             350 μm            500 μm         28
               10–5                                                                                                                         0
                 10–1         100          101         102           103         104          105         106                                   0         1                               2              3                      4                  5
                                                             λobs (μm)                                                                                                                     S350μm/S250μm

Figure 2 | Spectral energy distribution and Herschel/SPIRE colours of                                                 detected molecular/fine-structure emission lines in HFLS 3 require correction
HFLS 3. a, HFLS 3 was identified as a very high redshift candidate, as it appears                                     for extinction. The radio continuum luminosity of HFLS 3 is consistent with the
red between the Herschel/SPIRE 250-, 350- and 500-mm bands (inset). The                                               radio–FIR correlation for nearby star-forming galaxies. b, Flux density ratios
spectral energy distribution of the source (data points; lobs, observed-frame                                         (350 mm/250 mm and 500 mm/350 mm) of HFLS 3. The coloured lines are the
wavelength; nrest, rest-frame frequency; AB mag, magnitudes in the AB system;                                         same templates as in a, but redshifted between 1 , z , 8 (number labels
error bars are 1s r.m.s. uncertainties in both panels) is fitted with a modified                                      indicate redshifts). Dashed grey lines indicate the dividing lines for red
black body (MBB; solid line) and spectral templates for the starburst galaxies                                        (S250mm , S350mm , S500mm) and ultra-red (S250mm , S350mm and
Arp 220, M 82, HR 10 and the Eyelash (broken lines, see key). The implied FIR                                         1.3 3 S350mm , S500mm) sources. Grey symbols show the positions of five
luminosity is 2:86z0:32 3 1013 Lsun. The dust in HFLS 3 is not optically thick at
                    {0:31                                                                                             spectroscopically confirmed red sources at 4 , z , 5.5 (including three new
wavelengths longward of rest-frame 162.7 mm (95.4% confidence;                                                        sources from our study), which all fall outside the ultra-red cut-off. This shows
Supplementary Fig. 12). This is in contrast to Arp 220, in which the dust                                             that ultra-red sources will lie at z . 6 for typical shapes of the spectral energy
becomes optically thick (that is, td 5 1) shortward of 234 6 3 mm (ref. 20).                                          distribution (except those with low dust temperatures), whereas red sources
Other high-redshift massive starburst galaxies (including the Eyelash) typically                                      typically are at z , 5.5. See Supplementary Information sections 1 and 3 for
become optically thick around ,200 mm. This suggests that none of the                                                 more details.

M is the mass within radius r and G is the gravitational constant. For                                               as typically found in the nuclei of warm, intense starbursts, but dis-
r 5 1.7 kpc and M 5 Mgas, this suggests e 5 0.06, which is a few times                                               tributed over a large, ,3.5-kpc-diameter, region. The observed CO
higher than found in nearby starbursts and in giant molecular cloud cores                                            and [C II] luminosities suggest that dust is the primary coolant of the
in the Galaxy18.                                                                                                     gas if both are thermally coupled. The L[CII]/LFIR ratio of ,5 3 1024 is
   The properties of atomic and molecular gas in HFLS 3 are fully                                                    typical for high radiation environments in extreme starbursts and
consistent with a highly enriched, highly excited interstellar medium,                                               active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies19. The L[CII]/LCO(1–0) ratio
                                                                                                                     of ,3,000 suggests that the bulk of the line emission is associated with
Table 1 | Observed and derived quantities for HFLS 3, Arp 220 and                                                    the photon-dominated regions of a massive starburst. At the LFIR of
the Milky Way                                                                                                        HFLS 3, this suggests an infrared radiation field strength and gas
                                          HFLS 3                    Arp 220*                 Milky Way*
                                                                                                                     density comparable to nearby ULIRGs without luminous AGN
z                              6.3369                          0.0181                                                (figures 4 and 5 of ref. 19).
Mgas (Msun){                   (1.04 6 0.09) 3 1011            5.2 3 109               2.5 3 109                        From the spectral energy distribution of HFLS 3, we derive a dust
Mdust (Msun){                  1:31z0:32 3 109                 ,1 3 108                ,6 3 107
                                    {0:30                                                                            temperature of Tdust 5 56z9 K, ,10 K less than in Arp 220, but ,3
                                                                                                                                                 {12
M* (Msun)1                     ,3.7 3 1010                     ,(3–5) 3 1010           ,6.4 3 1010
Mdyn (Msun) ||                 2.7 3 1011                      3.45 3 1010             2 3 1011 (,20 kpc)            times that of the Milky Way. CO radiative transfer models assuming
fgas (%)"                      40                              15                      1.2                           collisional excitation suggest a gas kinetic temperature of Tkin 5
LFIR (Lsun)#                   2:86z0:32 3 1013
                                    {0:31
                                                               1.8 3 1012              1.1 3 1010                    144z59 K and a gas density of log10(n(H2)) 5 3:80z0:28 cm-3 (Sup-
                                                                                                                          {30                                                {0:17
SFR (Msun yr21)q               2,900                           ,180                    1.3                           plementary Information section 4 and Supplementary Figs 13 and 14).
Tdust (K)**                    55:9z9:3                        66                      ,19
                                    {12:0                                                                            These models suggest similar gas densities as in nearby ULIRGs, and
For details see Supplementary Information section 3.                                                                 prefer Tkin ? Tdust, which may imply that the gas and dust are not in
* Literature values for Arp 220 and the Milky Way are adopted from refs 20 and 27–30. The total
molecular gas mass of the Milky Way is uncertain by at least a factor of 2. Quoted dust masses and stellar
                                                                                                                     thermal equilibrium, and that the excitation of the molecular lines may be
masses are typically uncertain by factors of 2–3 owing to systematics. The dynamical mass for the Milky              partially supported by the underlying infrared radiation field. This is
Way is quoted within the inner 20 kpc to be comparable to the other systems, not probing the outer
regions dominated by dark matter. The dust temperature in the Milky Way varies by at least 65 K
                                                                                                                     consistent with the finding that we detect H2O and OH lines with upper
around the quoted value, which is used as a representative value. Both Arp 220 and the Milky Way are                 level energies of E/kB . 300–450 K and critical densities of .108.5 cm23
known to contain small fractions of significantly warmer dust. All errors are 1s r.m.s. uncertainties.               at line intensities exceeding those of the CO lines. The intensities and
{ Molecular gas mass, derived assuming aCO 5 Mgas/L9CO 5 1 Msun (K km s21 pc2)21 (see
Supplementary Information section 3.3).                                                                              ratios of the detected H2O lines cannot be reproduced by radiative trans-
{ Dust mass, derived from spectral energy distribution fitting (see Supplementary Information section                fer models assuming collisional excitation, but are consistent with being
3.1).
1 Stellar mass, derived from population synthesis fitting (see Supplementary Information section 3.4).
                                                                                                                     radiatively pumped by FIR photons, at levels comparable to those
||Dynamical mass (see Supplementary Information section 3.5).                                                        observed in Arp 220 (Supplementary Figs 15 and 16)20,21. The CO and
"Gas mass fraction, derived assuming fgas 5 Mgas/Mdyn (see Supplementary Information section 3.6).                   H2O excitation is inconsistent with what is observed in quasar host
#FIR luminosity as determined over the range of 42.5–122.5 mm from spectral energy distribution
fitting (see Supplementary Information section 3.1).                                                                 galaxies like Mrk 231 and APM 0827915255 at z 5 3.9, which lends
qSFR, derived assuming SFR (in Msun yr21) 5 1.0 3 10210 LFIR (in Lsun) (see Supplementary                            support to the conclusion that the gas is excited by a mix of collisions
Information section 3.2).
** Dust temperature, derived from spectral energy distribution fitting (see Supplementary Information
                                                                                                                     and infrared photons associated with a massive, intense starburst, rather
section 3.1).                                                                                                        than hard radiation associated with a luminous AGN22. The physical
                                                                                                                                                                  1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 6 | N AT U R E | 3 3 1
                                                                       ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
RESEARCH LETTER

                                                 a      Dust continuum               b   [C II](2P3/2–2P1/2)      c           Velocity           d    Velocity dispersion

                                   58º 46′ 25″


                     Declination   58º 46′ 24″                   G1B z = 2.092
                                                                                                                                      –175                           220
                                                                   HFLS3 z = 6.337
                                                                                                                       +500                             800
                                   58º 46′ 23″


                                   58º 46′ 22″
                                       17 h 06 min 48.0 s         17 h 06 min 47.6 s
                                                     Right ascension (J2000)

Figure 3 | Gas dynamics, dust obscuration, and distribution of gas and star                                suggesting gas and SFR surface densities of Sgas 5 1.4 3 104 Msun pc22 and
formation in HFLS 3. a, b, High-resolution (FWHM 0.350 3 0.230) maps of                                    SSFR 5 600 Msun yr21 kpc22 (,0.6 3 1013 Lsun kpc22). The high SSFR is
the 158-mm continuum (a) and [C II] line emission (b) obtained at 1.16 mm                                  consistent with a maximum starburst at near-Eddington-limited intensity.
with the PdBI in A-configuration, overlaid on a Keck/NIRC2 2.2-mm adaptive                                 Given the moderate optical depth of td , ,1 at 158 mm, this estimate is
optics image (rest-frame ultraviolet/optical light). The r.m.s. uncertainty in the                         somewhat conservative. c, d, Peak velocity (c) and FWHM velocity dispersion
continuum (a) and line (b) maps is 180 and 400 mJy per beam, and contours are                              (d) maps of the [C II] emission are obtained by Gaussian fitting to the line
shown in steps of 3s and 1s, starting at 5s and 3s, respectively. A z 5 2.092                              emission in each spatial point of the map. Velocity contours are shown in steps
galaxy (labelled G1B) identified through Keck/LRIS spectroscopy is detected                                of 100 km s21. High-resolution CO J 5 7–6 and 10–9 and H2O 321–312
,0.650 north of HFLS 3, but is not massive enough to cause significant                                     observations show consistent velocity profiles and velocity structure
gravitational lensing at the position of HFLS 3. Faint infrared emission is                                (Supplementary Figs 5–7). The large velocity dispersion suggests that the gas
detected towards a region with lower dust obscuration in the northeastern part                             dynamics in this system are dispersion-dominated. See Supplementary
of HFLS 3 (not detected at ,1 mm). The Gaussian diameters of the resolved                                  Information sections 3 and 5 for more details.
[C II] and continuum emission are 3.4 kpc 3 2.9 kpc and 2.6 kpc 3 2.4 kpc,


conditions in the ISM of HFLS 3 thus are comparable to those in the                                        in larger numbers may present a stern challenge to current models of
nuclei of the most extreme nearby starbursts, consistent with the finding                                  early cosmic structure formation.
that it follows the radio–FIR correlation for star-forming galaxies.
   HFLS 3 is rapidly assembling its stellar bulge through star formation                                   Received 4 October 2012; accepted 27 February 2013.
at surface densities close to the theoretically predicted limit for ‘max-                                  1.    Chapman, S. C. et al. A median redshift of 2.4 for galaxies bright at submillimetre
imum starbursts’23. At a rest-frame wavelength of 158 mm, the FIR                                                wavelengths. Nature 422, 695–698 (2003).
emission is distributed over a relatively compact area with 2.6 kpc                                        2.    Capak, P. et al. A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z < 5.3. Nature
                                                                                                                 470, 233–235 (2011).
3 2.4 kpc physical diameter along its major and minor axes respec-                                         3.    Walter, F. et al. The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z < 5.2 in
tively (Fig. 3; as determined by elliptical Gaussian fitting). This sug-                                         the Hubble Deep Field. Nature 486, 233–236 (2012).
gests an extreme SFR surface density of SSFR < 600 Msun yr21 kpc22                                         4.    Vieira, J. D. et al. Dusty starburst galaxies in the early Universe as revealed by
over a 1.3-kpc-radius region, and is consistent with near-Eddington-                                             gravitational lensing. Nature 495, 344–347 (2013).
                                                                                                           5.    Bouwens, R. et al. A candidate redshift z < 10 galaxy and rapid changes in that
limited star formation if the starburst disk is supported by radiation                                           population at an age of 500 Myr. Nature 469, 504–507 (2011).
pressure24. This suggests the presence of a kiloparsec-scale hyper-                                        6.    Oliver, S. et al. The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey: HerMES. Mon. Not. R.
starburst similar to that found in the z 5 6.42 quasar J114815251                                                Astron. Soc. 424, 1614–1635 (2012).
                                                                                                           7.      ´
                                                                                                                 Bethermin, M. et al. A unified empirical model for infrared galaxy counts
(ref. 25). Such high SSFR are also observed in the nuclei of local                                               based on the observed physical evolution of distant galaxies. Astrophys. J. 757, L23
ULIRGs such as Arp 220, albeit on scales two orders of magnitude                                                 (2012).
smaller. A starburst at such high SSFR may produce strong winds.                                           8.    Karim, A. et al. An ALMA survey of submillimetre galaxies in the Extended Chandra
                                                                                                                 Deep Field South: high resolution 870mm source counts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
Indeed, the relative strength and broad, asymmetric profile of the                                               (in the press); preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.0249 (2012).
OH 2P1/2(3/2–1/2) doublet detected in HFLS 3 may indicate a molecu-                                        9.    Bouwens, R. J. et al. Galaxies at z , 6: the UV luminosity function and luminosity
lar outflow, reminiscent of the OH outflow in Arp 22021.                                                         density from 506 HUDF, HUDF parallel ACS field, and GOODS i-dropouts.
   The identification of HFLS 3 alone is still consistent with the model-                                        Astrophys. J. 653, 53–85 (2006).
                                                                                                           10.   Robertson, B. et al. Early star-forming galaxies and the reionization of the Universe.
predicted space density of massive starburst galaxies at z . 6 with                                              Nature 468, 49–55 (2010).
S500mm . 30 mJy of 0.014 deg22 (ref. 7). This corresponds to only                                          11.   Michałowski, M. J. et al. Rapid dust production in submillimeter galaxies at z . 4?
1023–1024 times the space density of Lyman-break galaxies at the                                                 Astrophys. J. 712, 942–950 (2010).
                                                                                                           12.   Riechers, D. A. et al. Extended cold molecular gas reservoirs in z , 3.4
same redshift, but is comparable to the space density of the most                                                submillimeter galaxies. Astrophys. J. 739, L31 (2011).
luminous quasars hosting supermassive black holes (that is, a different                                    13.   Walter, F. et al. Molecular gas in the host galaxy of a quasar at redshift z 5 6.42.
population of massive galaxies) at such early cosmic times26. The host                                           Nature 424, 406–408 (2003).
galaxies around these very distant supermassive black holes are com-                                       14.   Lagos, C. & Del P. et al. On the impact of empirical and theoretical star formation
                                                                                                                 laws on galaxy formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 1566–1584 (2011).
monly FIR-luminous, but less intensely star-forming, with typically a                                      15.   Tacconi, L. J. et al. Submillimeter galaxies at z , 2: evidence for major mergers and
few times lower LFIR than ultra-red sources25. This highlights the dif-                                          constraints on lifetimes, IMF, and CO-H2 conversion factor. Astrophys. J. 680,
ference between selecting massive z . 6 galaxies at the peak of their                                            246–262 (2008).
                                                                                                           16.   Tacconi, L. J. et al. High molecular gas fractions in normal massive star-forming
star formation activity through LFIR, and at the peak of their black-hole                                        galaxies in the young Universe. Nature 463, 781–784 (2010).
activity through luminous AGN. The substantial population of ultra-                                        17.   Overzier, R. et al. LCDM predictions for galaxy protoclusters – I. The relation
red sources discovered with Herschel will be an ideal probe of early                                             between galaxies, protoclusters and quasars at z , 6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 394,
                                                                                                                 577–594 (2009).
galaxy evolution and heavy element enrichment within the first billion                                     18.   Krumholz, M. R. et al. A universal, local star formation law in galactic clouds, nearby
years of cosmic time. These galaxies are unlikely to dominate the star                                           galaxies, high-redshift disks, and starbursts. Astrophys. J. 745, 69 (2012).
formation history of the Universe at z . 6 (ref. 5), but they trace the                                    19.   Stacey, G. J. et al. A 158 mm [C II] line survey of galaxies at z , 1–2: an indicator of
highest peaks in SFR at early epochs. A detailed study of this galaxy                                            star formation in the early universe. Astrophys. J. 724, 957–974 (2010).
                                                                                                           20.   Rangwala, N. et al. Observations of Arp 220 using Herschel-SPIRE: an
population will reveal the mass and redshift distribution, number                                                unprecedented view of the molecular gas in an extreme star formation
density and likely environments of such objects, which if confirmed                                              environment. Astrophys. J. 743, 94 (2011).

3 3 2 | N AT U R E | VO L 4 9 6 | 1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3
                                                                 ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
LETTER RESEARCH

21. Gonzalez-Alfonso, E. et al. Herschel/PACS spectroscopy of NGC 4418 and                    Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper.
    Arp 220: H2O, H218O, OH, 18OH, O I, HCN and NH3. Astron. Astrophys. 541, A4
    (2012).                                                                                   Acknowledgements Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments
22. van der Werf, P. et al. Water vapor emission reveals a highly obscured, star-forming      provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important
    nuclear region in the QSO host galaxy APM 0827915255 at z 5 3.9. Astrophys.               participation from NASA. This research has made use of data from the HerMES project.
    J. 741, L38 (2011).                                                                       HerMES is a Herschel Key Programme using guaranteed time from the SPIRE
23. Elmegreen, B. G. Galactic bulge formation as a maximum intensity starburst.               instrument team, ESAC scientists and a mission scientist. See Supplementary
    Astrophys. J. 517, 103–107 (1999).                                                        Information for further acknowledgements.
24. Thompson, T. et al. Radiation pressure-supported starburst disks and active               Author Contributions D.A.R. had the overall lead of the project. C.M.B., D.L.C., I.P.-F.,
    galactic nucleus fueling. Astrophys. J. 630, 167–185 (2005).                              R.J.I., C.B., H.F., J.D.V. and R.N. contributed significantly to the taking and analysis of the
25. Walter, F. et al. A kiloparsec-scale hyper-starburst in a quasar host less than 1         follow-up data with different instruments by leading several telescope proposals and
    gigayear after the Big Bang. Nature 457, 699–701 (2009).                                  analysis efforts. C.D.D. led the selection of the parent sample. A. Conley, J.W., J.C., A.
26. Jiang, L. et al. A survey of z , 6 quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey deep stripe.   Cooray, P.H. and J.K. contributed significantly to the data analysis and to fitting and
    II. Discovery of six quasars at zAB.21. Astron. J. 138, 305–311 (2009).                   modelling the results. All other authors contributed to the proposals, source selection,
27. Downes, D. & Solomon, P. M. Rotating nuclear rings and extreme starbursts in              data analysis and interpretation, in particular through work on the primary Herschel
    ultraluminous galaxies. Astrophys. J. 507, 615–654 (1998).                                SPIRE data in which the source was discovered through the HerMES consortium (led by
28. Sodroski, T. J. et al. Large-scale characteristics of interstellar dust from COBE         J.B. and S.J.O.). All authors have reviewed, discussed, and commented on the
    DIRBE observations. Astrophys. J. 428, 638–646 (1994).                                    manuscript.
29. Murray, N. & Rahman, M. Star formation in massive clusters via the Wilkinson
    Microwave Anisotropy Probe and the Spitzer Glimpse survey. Astrophys. J. 709,             Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at
    424–435 (2010).                                                                           www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
30. McMillan, P. J. Mass models of the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414,              Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper. Correspondence
    2446–2457 (2011).                                                                         and requests for materials should be addressed to D.A.R. (dr@astro.cornell.edu).




                                                                                                                            1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 6 | N AT U R E | 3 3 3
                                                       ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

More Related Content

What's hot

A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3
A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3
A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3Sérgio Sacani
 
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...Sérgio Sacani
 
Prebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko
Prebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenkoPrebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko
Prebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko
Sérgio Sacani
 
Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82
Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82
Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82
Sérgio Sacani
 
Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...
Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...
Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5
Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5
Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5
Sérgio Sacani
 
The habitability of_proxima_centauri_b
The habitability of_proxima_centauri_bThe habitability of_proxima_centauri_b
The habitability of_proxima_centauri_b
Sérgio Sacani
 
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_holeCold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Sérgio Sacani
 
Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...
Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...
Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...
Anatol Alizar
 
Protostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_region
Protostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_regionProtostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_region
Protostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_regionSérgio Sacani
 
The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...
The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...
The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...
Sérgio Sacani
 
The nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_look
The nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_lookThe nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_look
The nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_lookSérgio Sacani
 
Is there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_system
Is there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_systemIs there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_system
Is there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_system
Sérgio Sacani
 
Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...
Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...
Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...Sérgio Sacani
 
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)
Sérgio Sacani
 
Dust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_alma
Dust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_almaDust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_alma
Dust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_almaSérgio Sacani
 
Dwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holes
Dwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holesDwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holes
Dwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holesSérgio Sacani
 

What's hot (20)

A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3
A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3
A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z&lt;5.3
 
Aa17123 11
Aa17123 11Aa17123 11
Aa17123 11
 
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
Detection of highvelocity_material_from_the_win_wind_collision_zone_of_eta_ca...
 
An alma survey
An alma surveyAn alma survey
An alma survey
 
Prebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko
Prebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenkoPrebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko
Prebiotic chemicals in_the_coma_of_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko
 
Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82
Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82
Discovery of carbon_radio_recombination_lines_in_m82
 
Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...
Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...
Evidence for pop_iii_like_stellar_populations_in_the_most_luminous_lyman_alph...
 
Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5
Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5
Chandra deep observation_of_xdcpj004402033_a_massive_galaxy_cluster_at_z_1_5
 
The habitability of_proxima_centauri_b
The habitability of_proxima_centauri_bThe habitability of_proxima_centauri_b
The habitability of_proxima_centauri_b
 
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_holeCold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
 
Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...
Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...
Ещё шесть радиосигналов неизвестной природы получены из-за пределов нашей гал...
 
Protostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_region
Protostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_regionProtostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_region
Protostars multiplicity and_disk_evolution_in_the_corona_australis_region
 
The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...
The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...
The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues II. Photometric redshifts and rest f...
 
Nature10550
Nature10550Nature10550
Nature10550
 
The nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_look
The nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_lookThe nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_look
The nustar extragalactic_survey_a_first_sensitive_look
 
Is there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_system
Is there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_systemIs there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_system
Is there an_exoplanet_in_the_solar_system
 
Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...
Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...
Alma redshifts of_millimeter_selected_galaxies_from_the_spt_survey_the_redshi...
 
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS)
 
Dust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_alma
Dust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_almaDust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_alma
Dust production and_particle_acceleration_in_supernova_1987_a_revealed_with_alma
 
Dwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holes
Dwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holesDwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holes
Dwarf galaxies with_optical_signatures_of_active_massive_black_holes
 

Viewers also liked

Essential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysics
Essential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysicsEssential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysics
Essential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysicsSérgio Sacani
 
Restricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branch
Restricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branchRestricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branch
Restricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branchSérgio Sacani
 
Observed properties of_extrasolar_planets
Observed properties of_extrasolar_planetsObserved properties of_extrasolar_planets
Observed properties of_extrasolar_planetsSérgio Sacani
 
The spinning black_hole
The spinning black_holeThe spinning black_hole
The spinning black_holeSérgio Sacani
 
Hi ho hoags_object_revised
Hi ho hoags_object_revisedHi ho hoags_object_revised
Hi ho hoags_object_revisedSérgio Sacani
 
Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...
Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...
Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...Sérgio Sacani
 
A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...
A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...
A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...Sérgio Sacani
 
Galaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universe
Galaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universeGalaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universe
Galaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universe
Sérgio Sacani
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Alma brochure en
Alma brochure enAlma brochure en
Alma brochure en
 
Essential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysics
Essential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysicsEssential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysics
Essential magnetohydrodynamics for_astrophysics
 
Restricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branch
Restricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branchRestricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branch
Restricted entry of_globular_cluster_stars_to_the_asymptotic_giant_branch
 
Observed properties of_extrasolar_planets
Observed properties of_extrasolar_planetsObserved properties of_extrasolar_planets
Observed properties of_extrasolar_planets
 
The spinning black_hole
The spinning black_holeThe spinning black_hole
The spinning black_hole
 
Hi ho hoags_object_revised
Hi ho hoags_object_revisedHi ho hoags_object_revised
Hi ho hoags_object_revised
 
Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...
Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...
Mapping the three_dimensional_density_of_the_galactic_bulge_with_vvv_red_clum...
 
A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...
A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...
A dynamically packed_planetary _system_around_gj667_c_with_three_superearths_...
 
Galaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universe
Galaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universeGalaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universe
Galaxy dynamics and the mass density of the universe
 

Similar to A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634

Galaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic history
Galaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic historyGalaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic history
Galaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic history
Sérgio Sacani
 
An excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxy
An excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxyAn excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxy
An excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxy
Sérgio Sacani
 
GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096
GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096
GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096
Sérgio Sacani
 
Discovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distances
Discovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distancesDiscovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distances
Discovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distances
Sérgio Sacani
 
An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst
An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburstAn excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst
An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst
Sérgio Sacani
 
Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus
Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of VenusPhosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus
Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus
Sérgio Sacani
 
A dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensing
A dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensingA dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensing
A dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensing
Sérgio Sacani
 
Alma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxies
Alma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxiesAlma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxies
Alma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxiesSérgio Sacani
 
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxiesSubmillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxiesSérgio Sacani
 
The most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wise
The most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wiseThe most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wise
The most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wise
Sérgio Sacani
 
AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...
AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...
AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...
Sérgio Sacani
 
An earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_density
An earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_densityAn earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_density
An earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_densitySérgio Sacani
 
No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...
No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...
No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...Sérgio Sacani
 
XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...
XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...
XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...
Sérgio Sacani
 
A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...
A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...
A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...
Sérgio Sacani
 
The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...
The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...
The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...Sérgio Sacani
 
The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...
The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...
The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...
Sérgio Sacani
 
An irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the Sun
An irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the SunAn irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the Sun
An irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the Sun
Sérgio Sacani
 
MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...
MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...
MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...
Sérgio Sacani
 

Similar to A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634 (20)

Galaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic history
Galaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic historyGalaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic history
Galaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic history
 
An excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxy
An excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxyAn excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxy
An excess of_dusty_starbusts_related_to_the_spiderweb_galaxy
 
GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096
GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096
GOALS-JWST: Unveiling Dusty Compact Sources in the Merging Galaxy IIZw096
 
Discovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distances
Discovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distancesDiscovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distances
Discovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distances
 
An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst
An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburstAn excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst
An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst
 
Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus
Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of VenusPhosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus
Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus
 
Aa17043 11
Aa17043 11Aa17043 11
Aa17043 11
 
A dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensing
A dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensingA dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensing
A dusty star-forming galaxy at z = 6 revealed by strong gravitational lensing
 
Alma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxies
Alma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxiesAlma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxies
Alma observations of_sptdiscovered_strongly_lensed_dusty_star_forming_galaxies
 
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxiesSubmillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
Submillimeter follow up_of_wise_selected_hyperluminous_galaxies
 
The most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wise
The most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wiseThe most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wise
The most luminous_galaxies_discovered_by_wise
 
AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...
AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...
AT 2022aedm and a New Class of Luminous, Fast-cooling Transients in Elliptica...
 
An earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_density
An earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_densityAn earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_density
An earth sized_planet_with_an_earth_sized_density
 
No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...
No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...
No global pluto_like_atmosphere_on_dwarf_planet_makemake_from_a_stellar_occul...
 
XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...
XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...
XUE: Molecular Inventory in the Inner Region of an Extremely Irradiated Proto...
 
A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...
A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...
A higher efficiency_of_converting_gas_to_stars_push_galaxies_at_z_1_6_well_ab...
 
The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...
The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...
The herschel exploitation_of_local_galaxy_andromeda_(helga)_global_farinfrare...
 
The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...
The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...
The JWST Discovery of the Triply-imaged Type Ia “Supernova H0pe” and Observat...
 
An irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the Sun
An irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the SunAn irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the Sun
An irradiated-Jupiter analogue hotter than the Sun
 
MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...
MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...
MUSE sneaks a peek at extreme ram-pressure stripping events. I. A kinematic s...
 

More from Sérgio Sacani

Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Sérgio Sacani
 
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
Sérgio Sacani
 
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...
Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...
Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...
Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...
Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...
Sérgio Sacani
 
The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...
The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...
The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...
Sérgio Sacani
 
A Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on Earth
A Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on EarthA Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on Earth
A Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on Earth
Sérgio Sacani
 
Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...
Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...
Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243
Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243
Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243
Sérgio Sacani
 
Detectability of Solar Panels as a Technosignature
Detectability of Solar Panels as a TechnosignatureDetectability of Solar Panels as a Technosignature
Detectability of Solar Panels as a Technosignature
Sérgio Sacani
 
Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...
Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...
Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...
Sérgio Sacani
 
The solar dynamo begins near the surface
The solar dynamo begins near the surfaceThe solar dynamo begins near the surface
The solar dynamo begins near the surface
Sérgio Sacani
 
Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...
Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...
Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...
Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...
Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...
Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...
Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Continuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discs
Continuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discsContinuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discs
Continuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discs
Sérgio Sacani
 
WASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 Rp
WASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 RpWASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 Rp
WASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 Rp
Sérgio Sacani
 
Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic LakeWaterConditionsinGale...
Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic  LakeWaterConditionsinGale...Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic  LakeWaterConditionsinGale...
Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic LakeWaterConditionsinGale...
Sérgio Sacani
 
X-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center Chimney
X-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center ChimneyX-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center Chimney
X-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center Chimney
Sérgio Sacani
 

More from Sérgio Sacani (20)

Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
 
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
 
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
 
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
 
Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...
Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...
Gliese 12 b: A Temperate Earth-sized Planet at 12 pc Ideal for Atmospheric Tr...
 
Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...
Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...
Gliese 12 b, a temperate Earth-sized planet at 12 parsecs discovered with TES...
 
The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...
The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...
The importance of continents, oceans and plate tectonics for the evolution of...
 
A Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on Earth
A Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on EarthA Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on Earth
A Giant Impact Origin for the First Subduction on Earth
 
Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...
Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...
Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercont...
 
Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243
Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243
Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243
 
Detectability of Solar Panels as a Technosignature
Detectability of Solar Panels as a TechnosignatureDetectability of Solar Panels as a Technosignature
Detectability of Solar Panels as a Technosignature
 
Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...
Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...
Jet reorientation in central galaxies of clusters and groups: insights from V...
 
The solar dynamo begins near the surface
The solar dynamo begins near the surfaceThe solar dynamo begins near the surface
The solar dynamo begins near the surface
 
Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...
Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...
Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune’s Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Mat...
 
Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...
Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...
Exomoons & Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory I: On the Detection...
 
Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...
Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...
Emergent ribozyme behaviors in oxychlorine brines indicate a unique niche for...
 
Continuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discs
Continuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discsContinuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discs
Continuum emission from within the plunging region of black hole discs
 
WASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 Rp
WASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 RpWASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 Rp
WASP-69b’s Escaping Envelope Is Confined to a Tail Extending at Least 7 Rp
 
Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic LakeWaterConditionsinGale...
Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic  LakeWaterConditionsinGale...Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic  LakeWaterConditionsinGale...
Manganese‐RichSandstonesasanIndicatorofAncientOxic LakeWaterConditionsinGale...
 
X-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center Chimney
X-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center ChimneyX-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center Chimney
X-rays from a Central “Exhaust Vent” of the Galactic Center Chimney
 

Recently uploaded

Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR EventsMonitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Ana-Maria Mihalceanu
 
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdfMicrosoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Uni Systems S.M.S.A.
 
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Aggregage
 
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Nexer Digital
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Neo4j
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
Neo4j
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
DianaGray10
 
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
James Anderson
 
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
SOFTTECHHUB
 
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Albert Hoitingh
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
Jemma Hussein Allen
 
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdfSAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
Peter Spielvogel
 
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMEEssentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Safe Software
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
Neo4j
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Alpen-Adria-Universität
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
DianaGray10
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Quotidiano Piemontese
 
Free Complete Python - A step towards Data Science
Free Complete Python - A step towards Data ScienceFree Complete Python - A step towards Data Science
Free Complete Python - A step towards Data Science
RinaMondal9
 
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysClimate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Kari Kakkonen
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
DianaGray10
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR EventsMonitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
 
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdfMicrosoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
 
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
 
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
 
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
 
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
 
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
 
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdfSAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
 
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMEEssentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
 
Free Complete Python - A step towards Data Science
Free Complete Python - A step towards Data ScienceFree Complete Python - A step towards Data Science
Free Complete Python - A step towards Data Science
 
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysClimate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
 

A dust obscured_massive_maximum_starburst_galaxy_at_a_redshift_634

  • 1. LETTER doi:10.1038/nature12050 A dust-obscured massive maximum-starburst galaxy at a redshift of 6.34 Dominik A. Riechers1,2, C. M. Bradford1,3, D. L. Clements4, C. D. Dowell1,3, I. Perez-Fournon5,6, R. J. Ivison7,8, C. Bridge1, ´ A. Conley9, Hai Fu10, J. D. Vieira1, J. Wardlow10, J. Calanog10, A. Cooray1,10, P. Hurley11, R. Neri12, J. Kamenetzky13, J. E. Aguirre14, B. Altieri15, V. Arumugam8, D. J. Benford16, M. Bethermin17,18, J. Bock1,3, D. Burgarella19, A. Cabrera-Lavers5,6,20, S. C. Chapman21, ´ P. Cox12, J. S. Dunlop8, L. Earle9, D. Farrah22, P. Ferrero5,6, A. Franceschini23, R. Gavazzi24, J. Glenn9,13, E. A. Gonzalez Solares21, M. A. Gurwell25, M. Halpern26, E. Hatziminaoglou27, A. Hyde4, E. Ibar7, A. Kovacs1,28, M. Krips12, R. E. Lupu14, P. R. Maloney9, ´ P. Martinez-Navajas5,6, H. Matsuhara29, E. J. Murphy1,30, B. J. Naylor3, H. T. Nguyen1,3, S. J. Oliver11, A. Omont24, M. J. Page31, G. Petitpas25, N. Rangwala13, I. G. Roseboom8,11, D. Scott26, A. J. Smith11, J. G. Staguhn16,32, A. Streblyanska5,6, A. P. Thomson8, I. Valtchanov15, M. Viero1, L. Wang11, M. Zemcov1,3 & J. Zmuidzinas1,3 Massive present-day early-type (elliptical and lenticular) galaxies of number counts in the Herschel/SPIRE bands suggest a space probably gained the bulk of their stellar mass and heavy elements density of massive starburst galaxies at z . 6 with S500mm . 30 mJy through intense, dust-enshrouded starbursts—that is, increased of 0.014 deg22 (ref. 7). rates of star formation—in the most massive dark-matter haloes To understand the nature of galaxies selected by this technique, we at early epochs. However, it remains unknown how soon after the have obtained full frequency scans of the 3-mm and 1-mm bands Big Bang massive starburst progenitors exist. The measured red- towards HFLS 3 (also known as 1HERMES S350 J170647.81584623; shift (z) distribution of dusty, massive starbursts has long been S500mm/S350mm 5 1.45), the brightest candidate discovered in our study. suspected to be biased low in z owing to selection effects1, as con- These observations, augmented by selected follow-up over a broader firmed by recent findings of systems with redshifts as high as 5 wavelength range, unambiguously determine the galaxy redshift to be (refs 2–4). Here we report the identification of a massive starburst z 5 6.3369 6 0.0009 based on a suite of 7 CO lines, 7 H2O lines, and galaxy at z 5 6.34 through a submillimetre colour-selection tech- OH, OH1, H2O1, NH3, [C I] and [C II] lines detected in emission and nique. We unambiguously determined the redshift from a suite of absorption (Fig. 1). At this redshift, the Universe was just 880 million molecular and atomic fine-structure cooling lines. These measure- years old (or one-sixteenth of its present age), and 10 on the sky corre- ments reveal a hundred billion solar masses of highly excited, sponds to a physical scale of 5.6 kpc. Further observations from optical chemically evolved interstellar medium in this galaxy, which con- to radio wavelengths reveal strong continuum emission over virtually stitutes at least 40 per cent of the baryonic mass. A ‘maximum the entire wavelength range between 2.2 mm and 20 cm, with no starburst’ converts the gas into stars at a rate more than 2,000 times detected emission shortward of 1 mm (see Supplementary Informa- that of the Milky Way, a rate among the highest observed at any tion section 2 and Supplementary Figs 1–11 for additional details). epoch. Despite the overall downturn in cosmic star formation HFLS 3 hosts an intense starburst. The 870-mm flux of HFLS 3 is towards the highest redshifts5, it seems that environments mature .3.5 times higher than those of the brightest high-redshift starbursts enough to form the most massive, intense starbursts existed at least in a 0.25-deg2 region containing the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF)8. as early as 880 million years after the Big Bang. From the continuum spectral energy distribution (Fig. 2), we find that We have searched 21 deg2 of the Herschel/SPIRE data of the the far-infrared (FIR) luminosity LFIR and inferred star formation rate HerMES blank field survey6 at wavelengths 250–500 mm for ‘ultra- (SFR) of 2,900 Msun yr21 of HFLS 3 (where Msun is the solar mass) are 15– red’ sources with flux densities S250mm , S350mm , S500mm and S500mm/ 20 times those of the prototypical local ultra-luminous starburst Arp 220, S350mm . 1.3, that is, galaxies that are significantly redder (and thus, and .2,000 times those of the Milky Way (Table 1 and Supplementary potentially at higher redshift) than massive starbursts discovered thus Information section 3). The SFR of HFLS 3 alone corresponds to ,4.5 far. This selection yields five candidate ultra-red sources down to a flux times the ultraviolet-based SFR of all z 5 5.5–6.5 star-forming galaxies in limit of 30 mJy at 500 mm (.5s and above the confusion noise; see the HUDF combined9, but the rarity and dust obscuration of ultra-red Supplementary Information section 1 for additional details), corres- sources like HFLS 3 implies that they do not dominate the ultraviolet ponding to a source density of #0.24 deg22. For comparison, models photon density needed to reionize the Universe10. 1 California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 249-17, Pasadena, California 91125, USA. 2Cornell University, 220 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, USA. 4Astrophysics Group, Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 5Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. 6Departamento de Astrofisica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. 7UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK. 8Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK. 9Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy 389-UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. 10Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA. 11Astronomy Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK. 12Institut de RadioAstronomie Millimetrique, 300 Rue de la Piscine, Domaine Universitaire, F-38406 Saint Martin d’Heres, France. 13Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, CASA 389-UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. 14Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. 15Herschel Science Centre, European Space Astronomy Centre, Villanueva de la Canada, 28691 Madrid, Spain. 16Observational Cosmology ˜ Laboratory, Code 665, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA. 17Laboratoire AIM-Paris-Saclay, CEA/DSM/Irfu – CNRS – Universite Paris Diderot, CEA Saclay, Point courrier ´ 131, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 18Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale (IAS), Ba ˆtiment 121, Universite Paris-Sud 11 and CNRS, UMR 8617, F-91405 Orsay, France. 19Aix-Marseille Universite, CNRS, ´ Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille, UMR7326, F-13388 Marseille, France. 20Grantecan S.A., Centro de Astrofısica de La Palma, Cuesta de San Jose, E-38712 Brena Baja, La Palma, Spain. 21Institute ´ 22 23 of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK. Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA. Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universita di Padova, vicolo Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova, Italy. 24Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, 98bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France. 25Harvard- ` Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. 26Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada. 27ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei Munchen, Germany. 28Institute for Astrophysics, University of Minnesota, 116 Church Street ¨ Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. 29Institute for Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace and Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan. 30Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, MS 100-22, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA. 31Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St Mary, Dorking RH5 6NT, UK. 32Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. 1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 6 | N AT U R E | 3 2 9 ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
  • 2. RESEARCH LETTER a 30 HFLS3 (z=6.3369) [C II] [O I] 25 Arp 220 (z=0.0181) Unlabelled lines, H2O 1.0 [N II] OH b c d CO H2O 20 CO Flux density (mJy) 0.5 CO 15 0.0 150 200 250 300 35 0 H 2O 10 H2O NH CO H2O CO NH3 CO H2O OH+ 5 CO H2O [C I] H2O+ CO 0 e f g h ij k l m n o 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,200 νrest (GHz) b c d e f g h 0.8 6.0 CO(J=6–5) 0.4 CO(J=1–0) CO(J=2–1) CO(J=3–2) H2O(211–202) 6.0 CO(J=7–6) and [C I] 6.0 H2O(202–111) 1.2 4.0 H2O+H2O+ 4.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 –0.2 0.0 0.0 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 –2 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 2, 2, 4, 2, 4, 6, 2, 4, 5, 2, 4, 2, –2 –4 –2 –2 –4 –5 –4 –2 –4 –2 i j k 15 l m n 60 o 8.0 OH+(1 –0 ) 8.0 H O(3 –3 ) OH(2Π1/2 J=3/2–1/2) 8.0 CO(J=9–8) 12 12 2 12 03 CO(J=10–9) 17 NH3(3,K)a–(2,K)s [C II](2P3/2–2P1/2) CO(J=9–8) 25 [–/+] [+/–] H2O(321–312) K=2,1,0 CO(J=16–15) 16 40 6.0 6.0 OH+ 6.0 OH+ 10 15 20 4.0 4.0 4.0 20 14 5 15 2.0 2.0 13 2.0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 2, 2, 4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, –4 –2 –4 –2 –2 –4 –2 –2 –1 –1 –1 Velocity offset (km s–1) Figure 1 | Redshift identification through molecular and atomic (CARMA) not shown in a. The line profiles are typically asymmetric relative to spectroscopy of HFLS 3. a, Black trace, wide-band spectroscopy in the single Gaussian fits, indicating the presence of two principal velocity observed-frame 19–0.95-mm (histogram; rest-frame 2,600–130 mm) components at redshifts of 6.3335 and 6.3427. The implied CO, [C I] and [C II] wavelength range with CARMA (3 mm; ‘blind’ frequency scan of the full band), line luminosities are respectively (5.08 6 0.45) 3 106 Lsun, the PdBI (2 mm), the JVLA (19–6 mm) and CSO/Z-spec (1 mm; instantaneous (3.0 6 1.9) 3 108 Lsun and (1.55 6 0.32) 3 1010 Lsun. Strong rest-frame coverage). (CARMA, Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave submillimetre to FIR continuum emission is detected over virtually the entire Astronomy; PdBI, Plateau de Bure Interferometer; JVLA, Jansky Very Large wavelength range. For comparison, the Herschel/SPIRE spectrum of the nearby Array; and CSO, Caltech Submillimeter Observatory.) This uniquely ultra-luminous infrared galaxy Arp 22020 is overplotted in grey (a). Lines determines the redshift of HFLS 3 to be z 5 6.3369 based on the detection of a labelled in italic are tentative detections or upper limits (see Supplementary series of H2O, CO, OH, OH1, NH3, [C I] and [C II] emission and absorption Table 2). Most of the bright spectral features detected in Arp 22020,21 are also lines. b–o, Detailed profiles of detected lines (histograms; rest frequencies are detected in HFLS 3 (in spectral regions not blocked by the terrestrial indicated by corresponding letters in a). 1-mm lines (m–o) are deeper, atmosphere). See Supplementary Information sections 2–4 for more details. interferometric confirmation observations for NH3, OH (both PdBI) and [C II] HFLS 3 is a massive, gas-rich galaxy. From the spectral energy distri- gas mass fraction in galaxies is a measure of the relative depletion and bution and the intensity of the CO and [C II] emission, we find a dust replenishment of molecular gas, and is expected to be a function of halo mass of Md 5 1.3 3 109 Msun and total molecular and atomic gas masses mass and redshift from simulations14. In HFLS 3, we find a high gas mass of respectively Mgas 5 1.0 3 1011 Msun and MHI 5 2.0 3 1010 Msun. These fraction of fgas 5 Mgas/Mdyn < 40%, comparable to what is found in sub- masses are 15–20 times those of Arp 220, and correspond to a gas-to- millimetre-selected starbursts and massive star-forming galaxies at z < 2 dust ratio of ,80 and a gas depletion timescale of Mgas/SFR < 36 Myr. (refs 15, 16), but ,3 times higher than in nearby ultra-luminous infrared These values are comparable to lower-redshift submillimetre-selected galaxies (ULIRGs) like Arp 220, and .30 times higher than in the Milky starbursts11,12. From the [C I] luminosity, we find an atomic carbon mass Way. From population synthesis modelling, we find a stellar mass of of 4.5 3 107 Msun. At the current SFR of HFLS 3, this level of carbon M* 5 3.7 3 1010 Msun, comparable to that of Arp 220 and about half that enrichment could have been achieved through supernovae on a timescale of the Milky Way. This suggests that at most ,40% of Mdyn within the of ,107 yr (ref. 13). The profiles of the molecular and atomic emission radius of the gas reservoir is due to dark matter. With up to ,1011 Msun of lines typically show two velocity components (Fig. 1 and Supplementary dark matter within 3.4 kpc, HFLS 3 is likely to reside in a dark-matter halo Figs 5 and 7). The gas is distributed over a region of 1.7 kpc radius with a massive enough to grow a present-day galaxy cluster17. The efficiency high velocity gradient and dispersion (Fig. 3). This suggests a dispersion- of star formation is given by e 5 tdyn 3 SFR/Mgas, where tdyn 5 (r3/ dominated galaxy with a dynamical mass of Mdyn 5 2.7 3 1011 Msun. The (2GM))1/2 is the dynamical (or free-fall) time, r is the source radius, 3 3 0 | N AT U R E | VO L 4 9 6 | 1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
  • 3. LETTER RESEARCH a νrest (GHz) b 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 102 4 12 HFLS3 Arp220 S350μm > S250μm MBB M82 101 Arp220 14 8 HR10 M8 2 Eyelash HR10 3 7 16 100 Eyelash S500μm / S350μm 18 6 Flux (mJy) 10–1 AB mag 20 2 5 10–2 7 8 22 6 HFLS3 z=6.34 5 S500μm > 1.3 S350μm 4 3 4 10–3 24 HLock102 z=5.29 S500μm > S350μm 2 1 z=1 3 HLS A773 z=5.24 1′ 26 HFLS1 z=4.29 10–4 2 HATLAS ID141 z=4.24 z=1 HFLS5 z=4.44 250 μm 350 μm 500 μm 28 10–5 0 10–1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 0 1 2 3 4 5 λobs (μm) S350μm/S250μm Figure 2 | Spectral energy distribution and Herschel/SPIRE colours of detected molecular/fine-structure emission lines in HFLS 3 require correction HFLS 3. a, HFLS 3 was identified as a very high redshift candidate, as it appears for extinction. The radio continuum luminosity of HFLS 3 is consistent with the red between the Herschel/SPIRE 250-, 350- and 500-mm bands (inset). The radio–FIR correlation for nearby star-forming galaxies. b, Flux density ratios spectral energy distribution of the source (data points; lobs, observed-frame (350 mm/250 mm and 500 mm/350 mm) of HFLS 3. The coloured lines are the wavelength; nrest, rest-frame frequency; AB mag, magnitudes in the AB system; same templates as in a, but redshifted between 1 , z , 8 (number labels error bars are 1s r.m.s. uncertainties in both panels) is fitted with a modified indicate redshifts). Dashed grey lines indicate the dividing lines for red black body (MBB; solid line) and spectral templates for the starburst galaxies (S250mm , S350mm , S500mm) and ultra-red (S250mm , S350mm and Arp 220, M 82, HR 10 and the Eyelash (broken lines, see key). The implied FIR 1.3 3 S350mm , S500mm) sources. Grey symbols show the positions of five luminosity is 2:86z0:32 3 1013 Lsun. The dust in HFLS 3 is not optically thick at {0:31 spectroscopically confirmed red sources at 4 , z , 5.5 (including three new wavelengths longward of rest-frame 162.7 mm (95.4% confidence; sources from our study), which all fall outside the ultra-red cut-off. This shows Supplementary Fig. 12). This is in contrast to Arp 220, in which the dust that ultra-red sources will lie at z . 6 for typical shapes of the spectral energy becomes optically thick (that is, td 5 1) shortward of 234 6 3 mm (ref. 20). distribution (except those with low dust temperatures), whereas red sources Other high-redshift massive starburst galaxies (including the Eyelash) typically typically are at z , 5.5. See Supplementary Information sections 1 and 3 for become optically thick around ,200 mm. This suggests that none of the more details. M is the mass within radius r and G is the gravitational constant. For as typically found in the nuclei of warm, intense starbursts, but dis- r 5 1.7 kpc and M 5 Mgas, this suggests e 5 0.06, which is a few times tributed over a large, ,3.5-kpc-diameter, region. The observed CO higher than found in nearby starbursts and in giant molecular cloud cores and [C II] luminosities suggest that dust is the primary coolant of the in the Galaxy18. gas if both are thermally coupled. The L[CII]/LFIR ratio of ,5 3 1024 is The properties of atomic and molecular gas in HFLS 3 are fully typical for high radiation environments in extreme starbursts and consistent with a highly enriched, highly excited interstellar medium, active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies19. The L[CII]/LCO(1–0) ratio of ,3,000 suggests that the bulk of the line emission is associated with Table 1 | Observed and derived quantities for HFLS 3, Arp 220 and the photon-dominated regions of a massive starburst. At the LFIR of the Milky Way HFLS 3, this suggests an infrared radiation field strength and gas HFLS 3 Arp 220* Milky Way* density comparable to nearby ULIRGs without luminous AGN z 6.3369 0.0181 (figures 4 and 5 of ref. 19). Mgas (Msun){ (1.04 6 0.09) 3 1011 5.2 3 109 2.5 3 109 From the spectral energy distribution of HFLS 3, we derive a dust Mdust (Msun){ 1:31z0:32 3 109 ,1 3 108 ,6 3 107 {0:30 temperature of Tdust 5 56z9 K, ,10 K less than in Arp 220, but ,3 {12 M* (Msun)1 ,3.7 3 1010 ,(3–5) 3 1010 ,6.4 3 1010 Mdyn (Msun) || 2.7 3 1011 3.45 3 1010 2 3 1011 (,20 kpc) times that of the Milky Way. CO radiative transfer models assuming fgas (%)" 40 15 1.2 collisional excitation suggest a gas kinetic temperature of Tkin 5 LFIR (Lsun)# 2:86z0:32 3 1013 {0:31 1.8 3 1012 1.1 3 1010 144z59 K and a gas density of log10(n(H2)) 5 3:80z0:28 cm-3 (Sup- {30 {0:17 SFR (Msun yr21)q 2,900 ,180 1.3 plementary Information section 4 and Supplementary Figs 13 and 14). Tdust (K)** 55:9z9:3 66 ,19 {12:0 These models suggest similar gas densities as in nearby ULIRGs, and For details see Supplementary Information section 3. prefer Tkin ? Tdust, which may imply that the gas and dust are not in * Literature values for Arp 220 and the Milky Way are adopted from refs 20 and 27–30. The total molecular gas mass of the Milky Way is uncertain by at least a factor of 2. Quoted dust masses and stellar thermal equilibrium, and that the excitation of the molecular lines may be masses are typically uncertain by factors of 2–3 owing to systematics. The dynamical mass for the Milky partially supported by the underlying infrared radiation field. This is Way is quoted within the inner 20 kpc to be comparable to the other systems, not probing the outer regions dominated by dark matter. The dust temperature in the Milky Way varies by at least 65 K consistent with the finding that we detect H2O and OH lines with upper around the quoted value, which is used as a representative value. Both Arp 220 and the Milky Way are level energies of E/kB . 300–450 K and critical densities of .108.5 cm23 known to contain small fractions of significantly warmer dust. All errors are 1s r.m.s. uncertainties. at line intensities exceeding those of the CO lines. The intensities and { Molecular gas mass, derived assuming aCO 5 Mgas/L9CO 5 1 Msun (K km s21 pc2)21 (see Supplementary Information section 3.3). ratios of the detected H2O lines cannot be reproduced by radiative trans- { Dust mass, derived from spectral energy distribution fitting (see Supplementary Information section fer models assuming collisional excitation, but are consistent with being 3.1). 1 Stellar mass, derived from population synthesis fitting (see Supplementary Information section 3.4). radiatively pumped by FIR photons, at levels comparable to those ||Dynamical mass (see Supplementary Information section 3.5). observed in Arp 220 (Supplementary Figs 15 and 16)20,21. The CO and "Gas mass fraction, derived assuming fgas 5 Mgas/Mdyn (see Supplementary Information section 3.6). H2O excitation is inconsistent with what is observed in quasar host #FIR luminosity as determined over the range of 42.5–122.5 mm from spectral energy distribution fitting (see Supplementary Information section 3.1). galaxies like Mrk 231 and APM 0827915255 at z 5 3.9, which lends qSFR, derived assuming SFR (in Msun yr21) 5 1.0 3 10210 LFIR (in Lsun) (see Supplementary support to the conclusion that the gas is excited by a mix of collisions Information section 3.2). ** Dust temperature, derived from spectral energy distribution fitting (see Supplementary Information and infrared photons associated with a massive, intense starburst, rather section 3.1). than hard radiation associated with a luminous AGN22. The physical 1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 6 | N AT U R E | 3 3 1 ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
  • 4. RESEARCH LETTER a Dust continuum b [C II](2P3/2–2P1/2) c Velocity d Velocity dispersion 58º 46′ 25″ Declination 58º 46′ 24″ G1B z = 2.092 –175 220 HFLS3 z = 6.337 +500 800 58º 46′ 23″ 58º 46′ 22″ 17 h 06 min 48.0 s 17 h 06 min 47.6 s Right ascension (J2000) Figure 3 | Gas dynamics, dust obscuration, and distribution of gas and star suggesting gas and SFR surface densities of Sgas 5 1.4 3 104 Msun pc22 and formation in HFLS 3. a, b, High-resolution (FWHM 0.350 3 0.230) maps of SSFR 5 600 Msun yr21 kpc22 (,0.6 3 1013 Lsun kpc22). The high SSFR is the 158-mm continuum (a) and [C II] line emission (b) obtained at 1.16 mm consistent with a maximum starburst at near-Eddington-limited intensity. with the PdBI in A-configuration, overlaid on a Keck/NIRC2 2.2-mm adaptive Given the moderate optical depth of td , ,1 at 158 mm, this estimate is optics image (rest-frame ultraviolet/optical light). The r.m.s. uncertainty in the somewhat conservative. c, d, Peak velocity (c) and FWHM velocity dispersion continuum (a) and line (b) maps is 180 and 400 mJy per beam, and contours are (d) maps of the [C II] emission are obtained by Gaussian fitting to the line shown in steps of 3s and 1s, starting at 5s and 3s, respectively. A z 5 2.092 emission in each spatial point of the map. Velocity contours are shown in steps galaxy (labelled G1B) identified through Keck/LRIS spectroscopy is detected of 100 km s21. High-resolution CO J 5 7–6 and 10–9 and H2O 321–312 ,0.650 north of HFLS 3, but is not massive enough to cause significant observations show consistent velocity profiles and velocity structure gravitational lensing at the position of HFLS 3. Faint infrared emission is (Supplementary Figs 5–7). The large velocity dispersion suggests that the gas detected towards a region with lower dust obscuration in the northeastern part dynamics in this system are dispersion-dominated. See Supplementary of HFLS 3 (not detected at ,1 mm). The Gaussian diameters of the resolved Information sections 3 and 5 for more details. [C II] and continuum emission are 3.4 kpc 3 2.9 kpc and 2.6 kpc 3 2.4 kpc, conditions in the ISM of HFLS 3 thus are comparable to those in the in larger numbers may present a stern challenge to current models of nuclei of the most extreme nearby starbursts, consistent with the finding early cosmic structure formation. that it follows the radio–FIR correlation for star-forming galaxies. HFLS 3 is rapidly assembling its stellar bulge through star formation Received 4 October 2012; accepted 27 February 2013. at surface densities close to the theoretically predicted limit for ‘max- 1. Chapman, S. C. et al. A median redshift of 2.4 for galaxies bright at submillimetre imum starbursts’23. At a rest-frame wavelength of 158 mm, the FIR wavelengths. Nature 422, 695–698 (2003). emission is distributed over a relatively compact area with 2.6 kpc 2. Capak, P. et al. A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z < 5.3. Nature 470, 233–235 (2011). 3 2.4 kpc physical diameter along its major and minor axes respec- 3. Walter, F. et al. The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z < 5.2 in tively (Fig. 3; as determined by elliptical Gaussian fitting). This sug- the Hubble Deep Field. Nature 486, 233–236 (2012). gests an extreme SFR surface density of SSFR < 600 Msun yr21 kpc22 4. Vieira, J. D. et al. Dusty starburst galaxies in the early Universe as revealed by over a 1.3-kpc-radius region, and is consistent with near-Eddington- gravitational lensing. Nature 495, 344–347 (2013). 5. Bouwens, R. et al. A candidate redshift z < 10 galaxy and rapid changes in that limited star formation if the starburst disk is supported by radiation population at an age of 500 Myr. Nature 469, 504–507 (2011). pressure24. This suggests the presence of a kiloparsec-scale hyper- 6. Oliver, S. et al. The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey: HerMES. Mon. Not. R. starburst similar to that found in the z 5 6.42 quasar J114815251 Astron. Soc. 424, 1614–1635 (2012). 7. ´ Bethermin, M. et al. A unified empirical model for infrared galaxy counts (ref. 25). Such high SSFR are also observed in the nuclei of local based on the observed physical evolution of distant galaxies. Astrophys. J. 757, L23 ULIRGs such as Arp 220, albeit on scales two orders of magnitude (2012). smaller. A starburst at such high SSFR may produce strong winds. 8. Karim, A. et al. An ALMA survey of submillimetre galaxies in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South: high resolution 870mm source counts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Indeed, the relative strength and broad, asymmetric profile of the (in the press); preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.0249 (2012). OH 2P1/2(3/2–1/2) doublet detected in HFLS 3 may indicate a molecu- 9. Bouwens, R. J. et al. Galaxies at z , 6: the UV luminosity function and luminosity lar outflow, reminiscent of the OH outflow in Arp 22021. density from 506 HUDF, HUDF parallel ACS field, and GOODS i-dropouts. The identification of HFLS 3 alone is still consistent with the model- Astrophys. J. 653, 53–85 (2006). 10. Robertson, B. et al. Early star-forming galaxies and the reionization of the Universe. predicted space density of massive starburst galaxies at z . 6 with Nature 468, 49–55 (2010). S500mm . 30 mJy of 0.014 deg22 (ref. 7). This corresponds to only 11. Michałowski, M. J. et al. Rapid dust production in submillimeter galaxies at z . 4? 1023–1024 times the space density of Lyman-break galaxies at the Astrophys. J. 712, 942–950 (2010). 12. Riechers, D. A. et al. Extended cold molecular gas reservoirs in z , 3.4 same redshift, but is comparable to the space density of the most submillimeter galaxies. Astrophys. J. 739, L31 (2011). luminous quasars hosting supermassive black holes (that is, a different 13. Walter, F. et al. Molecular gas in the host galaxy of a quasar at redshift z 5 6.42. population of massive galaxies) at such early cosmic times26. The host Nature 424, 406–408 (2003). galaxies around these very distant supermassive black holes are com- 14. Lagos, C. & Del P. et al. On the impact of empirical and theoretical star formation laws on galaxy formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 1566–1584 (2011). monly FIR-luminous, but less intensely star-forming, with typically a 15. Tacconi, L. J. et al. Submillimeter galaxies at z , 2: evidence for major mergers and few times lower LFIR than ultra-red sources25. This highlights the dif- constraints on lifetimes, IMF, and CO-H2 conversion factor. Astrophys. J. 680, ference between selecting massive z . 6 galaxies at the peak of their 246–262 (2008). 16. Tacconi, L. J. et al. High molecular gas fractions in normal massive star-forming star formation activity through LFIR, and at the peak of their black-hole galaxies in the young Universe. Nature 463, 781–784 (2010). activity through luminous AGN. The substantial population of ultra- 17. Overzier, R. et al. LCDM predictions for galaxy protoclusters – I. The relation red sources discovered with Herschel will be an ideal probe of early between galaxies, protoclusters and quasars at z , 6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 394, 577–594 (2009). galaxy evolution and heavy element enrichment within the first billion 18. Krumholz, M. R. et al. A universal, local star formation law in galactic clouds, nearby years of cosmic time. These galaxies are unlikely to dominate the star galaxies, high-redshift disks, and starbursts. Astrophys. J. 745, 69 (2012). formation history of the Universe at z . 6 (ref. 5), but they trace the 19. Stacey, G. J. et al. A 158 mm [C II] line survey of galaxies at z , 1–2: an indicator of highest peaks in SFR at early epochs. A detailed study of this galaxy star formation in the early universe. Astrophys. J. 724, 957–974 (2010). 20. Rangwala, N. et al. Observations of Arp 220 using Herschel-SPIRE: an population will reveal the mass and redshift distribution, number unprecedented view of the molecular gas in an extreme star formation density and likely environments of such objects, which if confirmed environment. Astrophys. J. 743, 94 (2011). 3 3 2 | N AT U R E | VO L 4 9 6 | 1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
  • 5. LETTER RESEARCH 21. Gonzalez-Alfonso, E. et al. Herschel/PACS spectroscopy of NGC 4418 and Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper. Arp 220: H2O, H218O, OH, 18OH, O I, HCN and NH3. Astron. Astrophys. 541, A4 (2012). Acknowledgements Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments 22. van der Werf, P. et al. Water vapor emission reveals a highly obscured, star-forming provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important nuclear region in the QSO host galaxy APM 0827915255 at z 5 3.9. Astrophys. participation from NASA. This research has made use of data from the HerMES project. J. 741, L38 (2011). HerMES is a Herschel Key Programme using guaranteed time from the SPIRE 23. Elmegreen, B. G. Galactic bulge formation as a maximum intensity starburst. instrument team, ESAC scientists and a mission scientist. See Supplementary Astrophys. J. 517, 103–107 (1999). Information for further acknowledgements. 24. Thompson, T. et al. Radiation pressure-supported starburst disks and active Author Contributions D.A.R. had the overall lead of the project. C.M.B., D.L.C., I.P.-F., galactic nucleus fueling. Astrophys. J. 630, 167–185 (2005). R.J.I., C.B., H.F., J.D.V. and R.N. contributed significantly to the taking and analysis of the 25. Walter, F. et al. A kiloparsec-scale hyper-starburst in a quasar host less than 1 follow-up data with different instruments by leading several telescope proposals and gigayear after the Big Bang. Nature 457, 699–701 (2009). analysis efforts. C.D.D. led the selection of the parent sample. A. Conley, J.W., J.C., A. 26. Jiang, L. et al. A survey of z , 6 quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey deep stripe. Cooray, P.H. and J.K. contributed significantly to the data analysis and to fitting and II. Discovery of six quasars at zAB.21. Astron. J. 138, 305–311 (2009). modelling the results. All other authors contributed to the proposals, source selection, 27. Downes, D. & Solomon, P. M. Rotating nuclear rings and extreme starbursts in data analysis and interpretation, in particular through work on the primary Herschel ultraluminous galaxies. Astrophys. J. 507, 615–654 (1998). SPIRE data in which the source was discovered through the HerMES consortium (led by 28. Sodroski, T. J. et al. Large-scale characteristics of interstellar dust from COBE J.B. and S.J.O.). All authors have reviewed, discussed, and commented on the DIRBE observations. Astrophys. J. 428, 638–646 (1994). manuscript. 29. Murray, N. & Rahman, M. Star formation in massive clusters via the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and the Spitzer Glimpse survey. Astrophys. J. 709, Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at 424–435 (2010). www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests. 30. McMillan, P. J. Mass models of the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper. Correspondence 2446–2457 (2011). and requests for materials should be addressed to D.A.R. (dr@astro.cornell.edu). 1 8 A P R I L 2 0 1 3 | VO L 4 9 6 | N AT U R E | 3 3 3 ©2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved