3. Kelshaw’s key terms to explain Political Participation dynamics: Political Participation Participation Relationships Participation Relationships
4.
5.
6. “ People who identify closely with political candidates or strongly prefer one outcome to another are more likely to participate than those who do not identify or weakly identify with a party or an ideology” (Campbell et al., 1964). Political Participation Personal preference has an impact on participation. This may not be an educated preference as we may hope it to be, it is just a personal preference.
11. 1. How does the theory of communication as political participation change the perception of your daily communication activities? 2. How do your daily interactions shape your personal and social ideals? 3. Do you believe that the mundane interaction of day-to-day life is just as political (if not as obviously and conscientiously) as any extraordinary public act? Political Participation
12. Political Participation References Shepherd, Gregory, J., St. John, J., Striphas, T., (2006). Communication as … Perspectives on theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage . Hwa-Froelich, Deborah A. Vigil, Debra C. ( 2004). Three Aspects of Cultural Influence on Communication: A Literature Review. Communication Disorders Quarterly . Volume: 25. Issue: 3. Lammie, K. (2005).Young adults and a model of political participation. International communication association . 1-25.