What Would Users Change in My App? Summarizing App Reviews for Recommending ...Sebastiano Panichella
Mobile app developers constantly monitor feedback in user reviews with the goal of improving their mobile apps and better
meeting user expectations. Thus, automated approaches have
been proposed in literature with the aim of reducing the effort
required for analyzing feedback contained in user reviews via
automatic classication/prioritization according to specific
topics. In this paper, we introduce SURF (Summarizer of
User Reviews Feedback), a novel approach to condense the
enormous amount of information that developers of popular
apps have to manage due to user feedback received on a
daily basis. SURF relies on a conceptual model for capturing
user needs useful for developers performing maintenance and
evolution tasks. Then it uses sophisticated summarisation
techniques for summarizing thousands of reviews and generating
an interactive, structured and condensed agenda of
recommended software changes. We performed an end-to-end
evaluation of SURF on user reviews of 17 mobile apps (5 of
them developed by Sony Mobile), involving 23 developers
and researchers in total. Results demonstrate high accuracy
of SURF in summarizing reviews and the usefulness of the
recommended changes. In evaluating our approach we found
that SURF helps developers in better understanding user
needs, substantially reducing the time required by developers
compared to manually analyzing user (change) requests and
planning future software changes.
What Would Users Change in My App? Summarizing App Reviews for Recommending ...Sebastiano Panichella
Mobile app developers constantly monitor feedback in user reviews with the goal of improving their mobile apps and better
meeting user expectations. Thus, automated approaches have
been proposed in literature with the aim of reducing the effort
required for analyzing feedback contained in user reviews via
automatic classication/prioritization according to specific
topics. In this paper, we introduce SURF (Summarizer of
User Reviews Feedback), a novel approach to condense the
enormous amount of information that developers of popular
apps have to manage due to user feedback received on a
daily basis. SURF relies on a conceptual model for capturing
user needs useful for developers performing maintenance and
evolution tasks. Then it uses sophisticated summarisation
techniques for summarizing thousands of reviews and generating
an interactive, structured and condensed agenda of
recommended software changes. We performed an end-to-end
evaluation of SURF on user reviews of 17 mobile apps (5 of
them developed by Sony Mobile), involving 23 developers
and researchers in total. Results demonstrate high accuracy
of SURF in summarizing reviews and the usefulness of the
recommended changes. In evaluating our approach we found
that SURF helps developers in better understanding user
needs, substantially reducing the time required by developers
compared to manually analyzing user (change) requests and
planning future software changes.
KEYSTONE HPSR Initiative // Module 7: Realist evaluation // Slideshow 1: Realist and theory driven approaches in HPSR
This is the only slideshow of Module 7: Realist evaluation, of the KEYSTONE Teaching and Learning Resources for Health Policy and Systems Research
To access video sessions and slides for all modules copy and past the following link in your browser:
http://bit.ly/25vVVp1
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Programmes and policies are complex in their design and implementation because of the number of interacting agents, components and forces that influence people and organisations in a given system. In this module through the realist evaluation approach explores why programmes/interventions work for some and not for others and getting to the core issue of trying to understand the conditions under which the interventions works.
There is 1 slideshow in this module.
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Module 7 Slideshow 1: Realist and theory- driven approaches in HPSR
The other modules in this series are:
Module 1: Introducing Health Systems & Health Policy
Module 2: Social justice, equity & gender
Module 3: System complexity
Module 4: Health Policy and Systems Research frameworks
Module 5: Economic analysis
Module 6: Policy analysis
Module 8: Systems thinking
Module 9: Ethnography
Module 10: Implementation research
Module 11: Participatory action research
Module 12: Knowledge translation
Module 13: Research Plan Writing
KEYSTONE is a collective initiative of several Indian health policy and systems research (HPSR) organizations to strengthen national capacity in HPSR towards addressing critical needs of health systems and policy development. KEYSTONE is convened by the Public Health Foundation of India in its role as Nodal Institute of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR).
The inaugural KEYSTONE short course was conducted in New Delhi from 23 February – 5 March 2015. In the process of delivering the inaugural course, a suite of teaching and learning materials were developed under Creative Commons license, and are being made available as open access resources. The KEYSTONE teaching and learning resources include 38 videos and 32 slide presentations organized into 13 modules. These materials cover foundational concepts, common approaches used in HPSR, and guidance for preparing a research plan.
These resources were created and are made available through support and funding from the Alliance for Health Policy & Systems Research (AHPSR), WHO for the KEYSTONE initiative.
Hannah Jobling. 'Community Treatment Orders: A Tale of Two Policy Transfers', European Conference for Social Work Research, University of Basel, Switzerland, 23rd March 2012.
KEYSTONE HPSR Initiative // Module 7: Realist evaluation // Slideshow 1: Realist and theory driven approaches in HPSR
This is the only slideshow of Module 7: Realist evaluation, of the KEYSTONE Teaching and Learning Resources for Health Policy and Systems Research
To access video sessions and slides for all modules copy and past the following link in your browser:
http://bit.ly/25vVVp1
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Programmes and policies are complex in their design and implementation because of the number of interacting agents, components and forces that influence people and organisations in a given system. In this module through the realist evaluation approach explores why programmes/interventions work for some and not for others and getting to the core issue of trying to understand the conditions under which the interventions works.
There is 1 slideshow in this module.
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Module 7 Slideshow 1: Realist and theory- driven approaches in HPSR
The other modules in this series are:
Module 1: Introducing Health Systems & Health Policy
Module 2: Social justice, equity & gender
Module 3: System complexity
Module 4: Health Policy and Systems Research frameworks
Module 5: Economic analysis
Module 6: Policy analysis
Module 8: Systems thinking
Module 9: Ethnography
Module 10: Implementation research
Module 11: Participatory action research
Module 12: Knowledge translation
Module 13: Research Plan Writing
KEYSTONE is a collective initiative of several Indian health policy and systems research (HPSR) organizations to strengthen national capacity in HPSR towards addressing critical needs of health systems and policy development. KEYSTONE is convened by the Public Health Foundation of India in its role as Nodal Institute of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR).
The inaugural KEYSTONE short course was conducted in New Delhi from 23 February – 5 March 2015. In the process of delivering the inaugural course, a suite of teaching and learning materials were developed under Creative Commons license, and are being made available as open access resources. The KEYSTONE teaching and learning resources include 38 videos and 32 slide presentations organized into 13 modules. These materials cover foundational concepts, common approaches used in HPSR, and guidance for preparing a research plan.
These resources were created and are made available through support and funding from the Alliance for Health Policy & Systems Research (AHPSR), WHO for the KEYSTONE initiative.
Hannah Jobling. 'Community Treatment Orders: A Tale of Two Policy Transfers', European Conference for Social Work Research, University of Basel, Switzerland, 23rd March 2012.
Presentation by Michael Röhrig at the 1. INOC Meeting in Wiesloch/ Germany.
Based on the Ideas of Gervase R. Bushe and Robert J. Marshak, he presented insights concerning OD and own experiences in applying the Theory in real projects.
A video of the presentation is be available on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb5lkgHzWh8
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and Training
CSCL 2013 Workshop Overview - Designing for Distributed Processes in CSCL
1. C S C L 2 0 1 3 I N V I T E D W O R K S H O P
S U N D AY J U N E 1 6 T H
E L I Z A B E T H S . C H A R L E S , D A W S O N C O L L E G E
M A R I E L M I L L E R & A L L Y S O N H A D W I N , U N I V E R S I T Y O F
V I C T O R I A
R O G E R A Z E V E D O & S U S A N N E L A J O I E , M C G I L L
2. GOALS OF THE WORKSHOP
This workshop began as an effort to explore the issue of group regulatory
processes in CSCL
• to take steps toward much needed conceptual clarity of how
regulation unfolds in collaboration
• to bring together varied perspectives about how regulation unfolds in
CSCL
• to contribute to development of new measures and analytical
techniques extending beyond the traditional focus on individual
outcomes and processes
• to inform on ways in which individuals and groups can be supported
in regulation in CSCL environments, as well as other collaborative
environments.
4. WORKSHOP PANEL
1. Liz Charles, Dawson College
2. Mariel Miller & Allyson Hadwin, University of Victoria
3. Roger Azevedo, McGill University
4. Susanne Lajoie, McGill University
5. Toni Rogat Kempler, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
6. Ming Ming Chiu, University at Buffalo, the State Univeristy of New
York
5. BREAK OUT SESSIONS
Topics of Discussion
Definitions & distinctions of regulatory processes
• Self-regulation
• Co-regulation
• Collective-regulation/ Socially-Supported Regulation (SSRL)
• Other regulation
Methodological issues:
• Roles of tensions / rejection / disagreement
• Issues of awareness of regulation (what are perceived as co-regulatory moves)
Roles of context – should we limit these?
• Adaptability of self & others
• Roles of tools
Analytic questions
• What is the unit of analysis
• Mutiple levels of data (indviduals-groups; across time)
8. SUMMARY DISCUSSION
1. How can we support learners & groups to regulate in CSCL
environments.
2. Defining shared or distributed regulatory processes;
Distinguishing them from knowledge construction/other
group processes.
3. Coding shared or distributed regulatory processes in data
4. Analytical techniques & strategies employed/issues