Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. Citation Tr.pdf
•
0 likes•2 views
Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. Citation Triandis, H. C. (1994). Cross- cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 103172). Consulting Psychologists Press. Critique this article by explaining following terms: Summary:Research problem Research goal Hypothesis Research Questions Research Method (briefly explain) Sample (participants) Tools (instruments, tests, surveys) Main findings (brief summary of the results) Conclusion Critique: Is the research important? Why? what methods and procedures were used? Evaluate the methods and procedures. Evaluate the sampling method and the sample used in this study. What type of research is this? Explain. How was the data analyzed? What is (are) the major finding(s)? Are these findings important? Do you agree or disagree with the findings? How does the findings/research compare to what we have been learning in class? Provide examples of workplace applicability. If you determine that the article cannot be applied effectively to the workplace, explain why or why not. What impact has this article had on your thinking?.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
! 1Running head INFORMED CONSENT RUA Informed Consen.docx
! 1
Running head: INFORMED CONSENT
RUA: Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
Student Name
Chamberlain University
Dr. Shakeeka Misher
11/29/18
INFORMED CONSENT !2
Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
In this section, you will discuss the problem and the focus of your group work, the
significance of the problem, health outcomes or statistics of the problem, present your PICOT
question, and include a purpose statement.
Description of Findings: Summary
Insert Matrix Table
Description of Findings: Description
In this section, you will discuss what concepts have been studied, methods utilized,
participants of the samples, any instruments utilized, reliability and validity, reflect back on the
purpose of your paper, and discuss recommendations. Ensure to identify two questions that can
help guide the group’s work.
Conclusion
Provide a one paragraph conclusion (3-5 sentences) regarding your paper.
INFORMED CONSENT !3
References
Ensure to place all references in APA format (include in-text citations within the paper).
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. doi: 10.1521533
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. Retrieved from www.journalofnursingineducation.com
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
Required Uniform Assignment: Analyzing Published Research
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4
and #8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence- based
practice. (POs #4 and #8)
DUE DATE
Refer to the course calendar for due date information. The college’s Late Assignment policy applies to this
activity.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS REQUIREMENTS
The paper will include the following.
1. Clinical question
a. Description of problem
b. Significance of problem
c. Purpose of paper
2. Description of findings
a. Summarize basics in the Matrix Table as found in Assignment Documents in e-College.
b. Describe
i. Concepts
ii. Methods used
iii. Participants
iv. Instruments including reliability and validity
v. Answer to “Purpose” question vi. Identify next step for group
3. Conclusion of paper
4. Format
a. Correct grammar and spelling
b. Use of headings for each section
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
c. Use of APA format (sixth edition)
d. Page length: three pages
PREPARING THE PAPER
1. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
2. Paper should include a title page and a reference pa.
PG writing about your methodology slides
This document discusses how to write the methodology section of a research paper. It recommends including: 1) the research philosophy/paradigm, 2) methodology, 3) methods, 4) research design/tools and methods of data analysis. The methodology section should explain the chosen methodology and why it is appropriate, potential limitations, and why other methodologies were not chosen. The methods section should describe the chosen methods, explain why they are appropriate, discuss potential limitations, and why other methods were not selected. The document provides examples of addressing these points for a qualitative study exploring work-life balance and employee retention in the IT industry.
Week 3 Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Week 3
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Resources
Readings
Turner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017).
Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches
(6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
o Chapter 1: Attachment Theory and Social Work Treatment (pp. 1–22)
o Chapter 25: The Psychoanalytic System of Ideas (pp. 398–410)
Foley, M., Nash, M., & Munford, R. (2009). Bringing practice into theory: Reflective practice and attachment theory.
Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review
,
21
(1/2), p39–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1-2id318
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Auld, F., Hyman, M., & Rudzinski, D. (2005). How is therapy with women different? In
Resolution and inner conflict: An introduction to psychoanalytic therapy
(pp. 217–236). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
National Association of Social Workers. (2008).
Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers.
Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of- Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Worksheet: Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study (Word document)
Theory Into Practice: Four Social Work Case Studies (PDF document)
Media
Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2014).
Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice
[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.psychotherapy.net.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/stream/w aldenu/video?vid=277
This week, watch the “Psychoanalytic Approaches” segment by clicking the applicable link under the “Chapters” tab.
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 5 of 24
Week 3
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Assignment
Application of Attachment Theory to a Case Study
By Day 7
Submit a 1- to 2-page case write-up that addresses the following:
Summarize the assumptions of attachment theory in 2 to 3
sentences.
Identify the problem in your chosen case study to be worked
on from an attachment theory perspective.
Explain how attachment theory defines and explains the cause
of the problem in one to two sentences.
Develop two assessment questions that are guided by
attachment theory that you would ask the client to understand
how the stress or distress is affecting the client.
Discuss two interventions to address the problem. Remember,
the theory should be driving the interventions. In other words, you would not identify systematic desensitization since this is not an intervention guided by attachment theory.
Formulate one self-reflective question that is influenced by attachment theory that you can ask yourself to gain greater empathy for what the client is experiencing.
Explain which outcomes you could measure to evaluate client progress based theory.
Be sure to:
Identify and correctly reference the case study you have
chosen.
Use literature to support your claims.
Use APA formatting and style.
o Remember to double-space your paper ...
Research critique
Critiquing research studies and articles is one of the method to improve the quality of research projects and it is also a method to learn research methodology for beginners.
CHAPTER 10 MIXED METHODS PROCEDURESHow would you write a mixed m
CHAPTER 10 MIXED METHODS PROCEDURES
How would you write a mixed methods procedure section for your proposal or study? Up until this point, we have considered collected quantitative data and qualitative data. We have not discussed “mixing” or combining the two forms of data in a study. We can start with the assumption that both forms of data provide different types of information (open-ended data in the case of qualitative and closed-ended data in the case of quantitative). If we further assume that each type of data collection has both limitations and strengths, we can consider how the strengths can be combined to develop a stronger understanding of the research problem or questions (and, as well, overcome the limitations of each). In a sense, more insight into a problem is to be gained from mixing or integration of the quantitative and qualitative data. This “mixing” or integrating of data, it can be argued, provides a stronger understanding of the problem or question than either by itself. Mixed methods research, therefore, is simply “mining” the databases more by integrating them. This idea is at the core of a new methodology called “mixed methods research.”
Conveying the nature of mixed methods research and its essential characteristics needs to begin a good mixed methods procedure. Start with the assumption that mixed methods is a methodology in research and that the readers need to be educated as to the basic intent and definition of the design, the reasons for choosing the procedure, and the value it will lend to a study. Then, decide on a mixed methods design to use. There are several from which to choose; consider the different possibilities and decide which one is best for your proposed study. With this choice in hand, discuss the data collection, the data analysis, and the data interpretation, discussion, and validation procedures within the context of the design. Finally, end with a discussion of potential ethical issues that need to be anticipated in the study, and suggest an outline for writing the final study. These are all standard methods procedures, and they are framed in this chapter as they apply to mixed methods research. Table 10.1 shows a checklist of the mixed methods procedures addressed in this chapter.
COMPONENTS OF MIXED METHODS PROCEDURES
Mixed methods research has evolved into a set of procedures that proposal developers and study designers can use in planning a mixed methods study. In 2003, the Handbook of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavior Sciences (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003) was published (and later added to in a second edition, see Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010), providing a comprehensive overview of this approach. Now several journals emphasize mixed methods research, such as the Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Quality and Quantity, Field Methods, and the International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. Additional journals actively encourage this form of inquiry (e.g., International Journal of ...
Research Critique
This document provides an outline for critiquing a research study. It includes sections to evaluate the problem statement, literature review, research design, instruments, data analysis, and conclusions. The critique examines aspects like variable definitions, sampling methods, reliability and validity of tools, appropriate use of statistics, and implications of the findings. The overall goal is to provide a systematic analysis of the strengths and limitations of the research.
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry.docx
MSN5300: Advanced Nursing Inquiry, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice Team:____________
Critical Appraisal Worksheet for Group Project 2, Part b
Elements of Appraisal
Discussion
Study Design
Was the study a qualitative or quantitative design? Explain.
Practice Problem
State the practice problem/issue that is the focus of the study.
How does this practice problem/issue affect
your nursing practice?
Study Purpose
State the purpose of the study.
Discuss whether this study was feasible to conduct in terms of money commitment; the researchers' expertise; availability of subjects, and ethical considerations.
Review of Literature
Was the literature review organized to show the progressive development of evidence from previous research?
Was a clear, concise summary presented of the current empirical and theoretical knowledge in the area of the study?
Did the literature review summary identify what was known and not known about the research problem? Did it logically direct the research purpose?
Theoretical Framework
Is a conceptual model or theoretical framework used? If so, is it presented with clarity? Does it adequately explain the phenomenon of concern?
Is the framework linked to the research purpose? If not, would another framework fit more logically with the study?
If a proposition or relationship from a theory is to be tested, is the proposition clearly identified and linked to the study hypothesis?
Research Question(s) and Hpothesis(es)
What is the research question? Is it clearly stated?
Does the research question match the purpose of the study?
What is the research hypothesis? Is it clearly stated?
Does the hypothesis match the purpose of the study?
Formulate a null hypothesis for this study.
Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships (propositions) in the framework? Explain.
Variables
List all research variables with corresponding levels of measurement on the NOIR scale.
Do variables represent the concepts identified in the framework?
How is each study variable defined (both conceptually
and operationally)?
Are conceptual definitions of variables consistent with operational definitions?
Study Design
What was the design was used in the study? Was it the most appropriate design to answer the study question? Explain.
Was the design logically linked to the sampling method and statistical analyses?
Did the design provide a means to examine
all objectives, questions, or hypotheses?
If there was an intervention (treatment) in the study:
· what was the intervention? was it clearly described?
· was the treatment appropriate for examining the study purpose and hypotheses?
· did the study framework explain the links between the treatment (independent variab.
MELJUN CORTES research seminar_1_selecting_a_problem_and_reviewing_the_research
The document discusses selecting a research problem and reviewing literature. It advises choosing a problem that interests you and is doable. Falling in love with your first idea can be risky, so consider alternatives. Review general sources to explore topics before examining secondary sources that summarize research and primary sources with specific studies. Carefully evaluate research by considering factors like the problem, hypotheses, methods, and results. Ethical research requires protecting participants and obtaining informed consent. The literature review should have a unified theme and be organized with an outline.
Recommended
! 1Running head INFORMED CONSENT RUA Informed Consen.docx
! 1
Running head: INFORMED CONSENT
RUA: Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
Student Name
Chamberlain University
Dr. Shakeeka Misher
11/29/18
INFORMED CONSENT !2
Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
In this section, you will discuss the problem and the focus of your group work, the
significance of the problem, health outcomes or statistics of the problem, present your PICOT
question, and include a purpose statement.
Description of Findings: Summary
Insert Matrix Table
Description of Findings: Description
In this section, you will discuss what concepts have been studied, methods utilized,
participants of the samples, any instruments utilized, reliability and validity, reflect back on the
purpose of your paper, and discuss recommendations. Ensure to identify two questions that can
help guide the group’s work.
Conclusion
Provide a one paragraph conclusion (3-5 sentences) regarding your paper.
INFORMED CONSENT !3
References
Ensure to place all references in APA format (include in-text citations within the paper).
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. doi: 10.1521533
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. Retrieved from www.journalofnursingineducation.com
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
Required Uniform Assignment: Analyzing Published Research
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4
and #8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence- based
practice. (POs #4 and #8)
DUE DATE
Refer to the course calendar for due date information. The college’s Late Assignment policy applies to this
activity.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS REQUIREMENTS
The paper will include the following.
1. Clinical question
a. Description of problem
b. Significance of problem
c. Purpose of paper
2. Description of findings
a. Summarize basics in the Matrix Table as found in Assignment Documents in e-College.
b. Describe
i. Concepts
ii. Methods used
iii. Participants
iv. Instruments including reliability and validity
v. Answer to “Purpose” question vi. Identify next step for group
3. Conclusion of paper
4. Format
a. Correct grammar and spelling
b. Use of headings for each section
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
c. Use of APA format (sixth edition)
d. Page length: three pages
PREPARING THE PAPER
1. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
2. Paper should include a title page and a reference pa.
PG writing about your methodology slides
This document discusses how to write the methodology section of a research paper. It recommends including: 1) the research philosophy/paradigm, 2) methodology, 3) methods, 4) research design/tools and methods of data analysis. The methodology section should explain the chosen methodology and why it is appropriate, potential limitations, and why other methodologies were not chosen. The methods section should describe the chosen methods, explain why they are appropriate, discuss potential limitations, and why other methods were not selected. The document provides examples of addressing these points for a qualitative study exploring work-life balance and employee retention in the IT industry.
Week 3 Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Week 3
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Resources
Readings
Turner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017).
Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches
(6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
o Chapter 1: Attachment Theory and Social Work Treatment (pp. 1–22)
o Chapter 25: The Psychoanalytic System of Ideas (pp. 398–410)
Foley, M., Nash, M., & Munford, R. (2009). Bringing practice into theory: Reflective practice and attachment theory.
Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review
,
21
(1/2), p39–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1-2id318
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Auld, F., Hyman, M., & Rudzinski, D. (2005). How is therapy with women different? In
Resolution and inner conflict: An introduction to psychoanalytic therapy
(pp. 217–236). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
National Association of Social Workers. (2008).
Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers.
Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of- Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Worksheet: Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study (Word document)
Theory Into Practice: Four Social Work Case Studies (PDF document)
Media
Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2014).
Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice
[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.psychotherapy.net.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/stream/w aldenu/video?vid=277
This week, watch the “Psychoanalytic Approaches” segment by clicking the applicable link under the “Chapters” tab.
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 5 of 24
Week 3
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Assignment
Application of Attachment Theory to a Case Study
By Day 7
Submit a 1- to 2-page case write-up that addresses the following:
Summarize the assumptions of attachment theory in 2 to 3
sentences.
Identify the problem in your chosen case study to be worked
on from an attachment theory perspective.
Explain how attachment theory defines and explains the cause
of the problem in one to two sentences.
Develop two assessment questions that are guided by
attachment theory that you would ask the client to understand
how the stress or distress is affecting the client.
Discuss two interventions to address the problem. Remember,
the theory should be driving the interventions. In other words, you would not identify systematic desensitization since this is not an intervention guided by attachment theory.
Formulate one self-reflective question that is influenced by attachment theory that you can ask yourself to gain greater empathy for what the client is experiencing.
Explain which outcomes you could measure to evaluate client progress based theory.
Be sure to:
Identify and correctly reference the case study you have
chosen.
Use literature to support your claims.
Use APA formatting and style.
o Remember to double-space your paper ...
Research critique
Critiquing research studies and articles is one of the method to improve the quality of research projects and it is also a method to learn research methodology for beginners.
CHAPTER 10 MIXED METHODS PROCEDURESHow would you write a mixed m
CHAPTER 10 MIXED METHODS PROCEDURES
How would you write a mixed methods procedure section for your proposal or study? Up until this point, we have considered collected quantitative data and qualitative data. We have not discussed “mixing” or combining the two forms of data in a study. We can start with the assumption that both forms of data provide different types of information (open-ended data in the case of qualitative and closed-ended data in the case of quantitative). If we further assume that each type of data collection has both limitations and strengths, we can consider how the strengths can be combined to develop a stronger understanding of the research problem or questions (and, as well, overcome the limitations of each). In a sense, more insight into a problem is to be gained from mixing or integration of the quantitative and qualitative data. This “mixing” or integrating of data, it can be argued, provides a stronger understanding of the problem or question than either by itself. Mixed methods research, therefore, is simply “mining” the databases more by integrating them. This idea is at the core of a new methodology called “mixed methods research.”
Conveying the nature of mixed methods research and its essential characteristics needs to begin a good mixed methods procedure. Start with the assumption that mixed methods is a methodology in research and that the readers need to be educated as to the basic intent and definition of the design, the reasons for choosing the procedure, and the value it will lend to a study. Then, decide on a mixed methods design to use. There are several from which to choose; consider the different possibilities and decide which one is best for your proposed study. With this choice in hand, discuss the data collection, the data analysis, and the data interpretation, discussion, and validation procedures within the context of the design. Finally, end with a discussion of potential ethical issues that need to be anticipated in the study, and suggest an outline for writing the final study. These are all standard methods procedures, and they are framed in this chapter as they apply to mixed methods research. Table 10.1 shows a checklist of the mixed methods procedures addressed in this chapter.
COMPONENTS OF MIXED METHODS PROCEDURES
Mixed methods research has evolved into a set of procedures that proposal developers and study designers can use in planning a mixed methods study. In 2003, the Handbook of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavior Sciences (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003) was published (and later added to in a second edition, see Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010), providing a comprehensive overview of this approach. Now several journals emphasize mixed methods research, such as the Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Quality and Quantity, Field Methods, and the International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. Additional journals actively encourage this form of inquiry (e.g., International Journal of ...
Research Critique
This document provides an outline for critiquing a research study. It includes sections to evaluate the problem statement, literature review, research design, instruments, data analysis, and conclusions. The critique examines aspects like variable definitions, sampling methods, reliability and validity of tools, appropriate use of statistics, and implications of the findings. The overall goal is to provide a systematic analysis of the strengths and limitations of the research.
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry.docx
MSN5300: Advanced Nursing Inquiry, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice Team:____________
Critical Appraisal Worksheet for Group Project 2, Part b
Elements of Appraisal
Discussion
Study Design
Was the study a qualitative or quantitative design? Explain.
Practice Problem
State the practice problem/issue that is the focus of the study.
How does this practice problem/issue affect
your nursing practice?
Study Purpose
State the purpose of the study.
Discuss whether this study was feasible to conduct in terms of money commitment; the researchers' expertise; availability of subjects, and ethical considerations.
Review of Literature
Was the literature review organized to show the progressive development of evidence from previous research?
Was a clear, concise summary presented of the current empirical and theoretical knowledge in the area of the study?
Did the literature review summary identify what was known and not known about the research problem? Did it logically direct the research purpose?
Theoretical Framework
Is a conceptual model or theoretical framework used? If so, is it presented with clarity? Does it adequately explain the phenomenon of concern?
Is the framework linked to the research purpose? If not, would another framework fit more logically with the study?
If a proposition or relationship from a theory is to be tested, is the proposition clearly identified and linked to the study hypothesis?
Research Question(s) and Hpothesis(es)
What is the research question? Is it clearly stated?
Does the research question match the purpose of the study?
What is the research hypothesis? Is it clearly stated?
Does the hypothesis match the purpose of the study?
Formulate a null hypothesis for this study.
Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships (propositions) in the framework? Explain.
Variables
List all research variables with corresponding levels of measurement on the NOIR scale.
Do variables represent the concepts identified in the framework?
How is each study variable defined (both conceptually
and operationally)?
Are conceptual definitions of variables consistent with operational definitions?
Study Design
What was the design was used in the study? Was it the most appropriate design to answer the study question? Explain.
Was the design logically linked to the sampling method and statistical analyses?
Did the design provide a means to examine
all objectives, questions, or hypotheses?
If there was an intervention (treatment) in the study:
· what was the intervention? was it clearly described?
· was the treatment appropriate for examining the study purpose and hypotheses?
· did the study framework explain the links between the treatment (independent variab.
MELJUN CORTES research seminar_1_selecting_a_problem_and_reviewing_the_research
The document discusses selecting a research problem and reviewing literature. It advises choosing a problem that interests you and is doable. Falling in love with your first idea can be risky, so consider alternatives. Review general sources to explore topics before examining secondary sources that summarize research and primary sources with specific studies. Carefully evaluate research by considering factors like the problem, hypotheses, methods, and results. Ethical research requires protecting participants and obtaining informed consent. The literature review should have a unified theme and be organized with an outline.
Pg writing about your methodology webinar
This document provides guidance on writing the methodology chapter or section of a research paper or dissertation. It explains that the methodology section describes how the research was conducted and why particular methods were chosen. The document offers tips for structuring the chapter, with sections on philosophy/paradigm, methodology, research methods, research design, and analysis. It suggests justifying choices by addressing questions about the appropriateness and limitations of the methodology and methods. Sample paragraphs demonstrate how to justify choices of qualitative methodology and individual interviews as the data collection method. The document stresses the importance of a detailed research design section and considering issues like reliability and validity. Overall, it aims to help researchers explain their research process and choices in their methodology chapter or section.
Research Critique.pptx
This document provides guidance on how to conduct a critical appraisal or critique of a research report. It emphasizes that a critique requires careful examination of all aspects of a study, including its methodology, analysis, and conclusions. The critique should objectively assess both the strengths and limitations of the research. Key aspects that should be evaluated include the study's design, sampling approach, data collection and analysis methods, and whether ethical standards were upheld. The critique aims to advance scientific knowledge by helping to identify ways future studies could be improved.
Critical appraisal
This document provides guidelines for evaluating scientific papers and theses. It outlines the key elements that should be assessed for each section, including the title, abstract, introduction, objectives, methods, results, discussion, and references. For each section, important criteria are listed to determine if the content is appropriate and follows best practices. The goal is to facilitate a thorough criticism of each paper by providing a standardized set of items to consider for evaluation.
Running head QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE1QUANTITATIVE RESEA.docx
Running head: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 1
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 5
Quantitative Research Critique
[Student’s Name]
PSY 326 Research Design
[Instructor’s Name]
[Date submitted]
Quantitative Research Critique
Introduction
[Instructions for using this template: Replace the text in brackets on the title page with your information. Answer the questions and provide the required information indicated below, in the order these items are presented. Use complete sentences in your response and delete the question or instruction, including this paragraph, after you have finished typing your answers. Throughout the paper, cite the source of the information. List the references for all sources that are cited, as indicated in the note on the References page.]
What is your purpose for writing this paper?
What is the title of the study you are critiquing, and who are the authors?
Summarize the research question(s) in your own words as much as possible. If your instructor allows quotes and you find it necessary to quote from the article, use quotation marks around the quoted passage and cite the quote in APA format with author’s last name, year of publication, and page number where the quoted material appeared.
State the hypothesis being tested in the research.
Briefly summarize background information on the topic from the study’s literature review.
Comment on whether or not there is any apparent bias in the selection of studies in the literature review.
Summary of Methods
Was this quantitative study experimental or non-experimental? How can you tell?
If the study was non-experimental, was it descriptive or was it correlational?
Name the sampling method and describe how the participants were selected.
How did the researchers collect data from the participants?
Did the researchers use validated instruments for data collection?
What statistical procedures were used to analyze the data?
What efforts were made to ensure validity and reliability? If none were apparent, note this fact in your critique.
Summary of Results
What statistically significant results were found in the study?
Was there an estimate of the practical significance or effect size of the results?
Did the researchers’ conclusion follow logically from the statistical results? Explain your reasoning.
Ethical Aspects
Did the researchers explicitly address ethical issues in the article? If not, was there evidence in the report that the participants’ wellbeing and confidentiality were protected?
Was an approval process by an Institutional Review Board or similar ethics review committee mentioned?
Were any of the practices ethically questionable? If so, what could have been done to resolve these issues?
Evaluation of Study
Referring to a source about the research design and methods used in this study to support your evaluation, do you feel the researchers used these methods appropriately to investigate the research question?
What do you see as the strengths of how this study ...
New microsoft office word document
This document provides a format for a scientific report, outlining the typical sections including an abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. The abstract describes the issue, why it is important, and key findings. The introduction discusses the problem, current research, and how the author plans to address it. The methods section explains how data was collected and evaluated. Results present the findings, and discussion analyzes the meaning, conclusions, and broader context of the results.
mixed method research.pptx
This document discusses mixed methods research design. It begins by defining mixed methods research as involving collecting and integrating both quantitative and qualitative data within a single research project to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon being studied. It then outlines the typical structure of a mixed methods research proposal, including an introduction with basic information, a section on the research topic, and a research plan section. The research plan section often includes a literature review and details on the specific mixed methods design and data collection methods. The document provides examples of five primary mixed methods designs: sequential explanatory, sequential exploratory, convergent parallel, embedded, and transformative.
List of articles that were used in past papers that cannot be used
This document provides guidance for writing a research critique assignment on a nursing-related research article. It lists topics that must be addressed in the critique, including describing the research problem, reviewing the literature, discussing the theoretical framework, methodology, data analysis, conclusions, and implications for nursing. The critique must be 4-6 pages plus a cover page and reference page, and follow APA style. Articles used previously or that are review articles cannot be selected.
Research Method.ppt
The document discusses research methods and definitions. It defines research as a systematic process of inquiry to discover facts or theories. Research methodology involves defining the problem, objectives, literature review, methodology, subjects, design, data collection, analysis and bibliography. Methods of data collection discussed include questionnaires, interviews and observations. Questionnaires can be closed-ended, open-ended, use scales or checklists. Interviews allow more in-depth information but take more time.
Research in Social Psychology [WLOs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs 1, 2, 3.docx
Research in Social Psychology [WLOs: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
To prepare for this discussion, please read
Chapter 1: Studying Social Psychology
of your textbook and
Exploring the Ethics and Psychological Impact of Deception in Psychological Research
article.
In this discussion, you will consider principles of scientific research, including methodology and ethical considerations.
First, visit the
Online Social Psychology Studies (Links to an external site.)
web page and select any study from the list. (Note that some links may be broken; if you choose a study that is unavailable, simply pick another option.) Participate in the research by following the instructions. After you have completed the study, answer the following questions (see Chapter 1 and Boynton, Portnoy, & Johnson, 2013):
Indicate
the study you completed, including the web link.
Describe
the research that was conducted. What did you do? What type of method do you think the researcher was utilizing? Can you identify the hypothesis and/or theory?
Appraise
the study based on your understanding of research gained from the reading. What elements of the study “worked” and what would you suggest the researchers do to improve their study? Mention at least three specific elements.
Indicate
any relevant ethical concerns. Was deception utilized?
Identify
situational factors and/or social and cultural influences that may impact the phenomenon being studied.
Illustrate
how this insight may be relevant to your personal or professional life through specific examples.
To fully demonstrate content knowledge and critical thinking in your Research in Social Psychology discussion
Interpret
course concepts explicitly, applying them to your personal experiences/observations, and cite the required readings as appropriate.
Be thorough and specific
, structuring your work intentionally (with an introductory and concluding sentence or two), providing clear context, and concisely and precisely explaining relevant course concepts.
Use personal examples
to illustrate as appropriate, but do be sure to provide an objective analysis too,
referencing required materials
and using additional sources as needed to support your insight.
Use your own
Academic Voice
(Links to an external site.)
and apply in-text citations
appropriately throughout your post.
Review
APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)
for more information.
Your original post should be a
minimum of 300 words
.
Social Thinking [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 5]
To prepare for this discussion, please read
Chapter 4: Attitudes, Attributions, and Behaviors
;
Chapter 5: Making Judgments
; and
Chapter 6: Prejudice
of your textbook, and
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
and
Intergroup Contact Theory
articles. In addition, watch
A Class Divided
.
In this discussion, you will consider theoretical perspectives on the formation, maintenance, .
Assignment 1 Mixed Methods Research Manuscript CritiqueIn this mo.docx
Assignment 1: Mixed Methods Research Manuscript Critique
In this module we expanded our knowledge about mixed methodology. ByWednesday, April 15, 2015 complete the following manuscript research critique for the Mixed Method research article you selected in Module 1. Provide feedback to at least two of your peers by Friday, April 17, 2015.
Manuscript Reference:
Andrew J. & Rohm, G. R. (2006). A Mixed-Method Approach for Developing Market Segmentation Typologies in the Sports Industry.
Sport Marketing Quarterly, 15
, 29-39.
Type of Study:
Mixed Method
Research Topic:
Purpose of the Study:
Theoretical Framework: (Identify the theoretical/conceptual framework)
Specific Research Questions/ Philosophical Underpinnings:
Sample:
Mixed method design: (present the elements of quantitative and qualitative and describe how these compliment each other and why it was important or was not important, to conduct this research as a mixed methods design.)
Procedure: (How was the data collected? What was the sampling strategy used?)
Variables/Concepts: (Identify the Dependent and Independent Variables or confounds.)
Instrument(s) analysis: (Discuss reliability, validity and generalizability of the measures included in the study and/or discuss methods for collecting data. Discuss how rigor is assured.)
Data analysis: (Discuss the statistical software, if any, used in analysis of the data and the type of analyses included.)
Consent: (What type of consent, if any, was obtained from the participants?)
All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing
Assignment 2: Mixed Methodology
Your research question may or may not be appropriately answered using a Mixed methodology model. In this assignment you will apply what you have learned aboutmixed methodology from the readings and the Assignment 1 discussion to your own research question. If your research question is best answered using Mixed methodology, stick with it and complete the critique below. If not, how might you alter your question so that it may be answered using mixed methodology? Although research is driven by questions, for this assignment we are going to turn it around so we may explore the benefits and differences of various types of methodologies. Adjust your question to fit a mixed methods design and complete the critique below.
For Example: In assignments M4A2 and M5A2 you may have had to change your research question so that it should be answered using a different design. The example questions included, “What are the perceptions of students regarding their experiences with faculty mentors”, best answered using qualitative research, and “What types of interactions do students value most with their faculty mentors?”, best answered using quantitative research.
Both of the questions would produce information about the topic of effective mentoring of graduate students. In a mixed methods design there is value and need to gather both quantitative and qualitative data. In t.
Research design slide show kd2
The document discusses writing the research design section of a thesis. It explains that the research design justifies the structure and reasoning behind the investigations, not just describing what was done. It discusses the differences between the methodology and methods sections. The methodology explains the reasoning and thinking behind the choice of methods, while methods details the procedures. Both sections require justifying decisions through the literature. The document provides guidance on how to explain and defend the chosen research approach over alternatives in the methodology section. It emphasizes showing how the chosen method will best address the research problem. The methods section should provide enough detail to allow others to replicate the work.
Publishing Research by Dr.Marta Elliot
This document provides guidance on publishing research results in academic journals. It outlines the typical components of a research paper, including an introduction describing the purpose and literature review, methods, results presented in tables and discussed in text, and a discussion and conclusion section. The document also offers tips on selecting an appropriate journal based on its aims and scope, following author instructions carefully, and having others edit the paper before submitting.
APA Style Research Paper
This document provides an overview of different types of research reports and their structure according to APA style. It defines qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research and explains how they each answer different types of research questions. The seven typical parts of a research report are described: title page, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and references. Guidance is provided for each section, highlighting important differences in content and structure depending on the type of research. For example, the method section should describe participants, procedures, instruments, and statistical analysis for quantitative reports but focus more on settings and procedures for qualitative reports. Overall, the document serves as a guide for writing research reports in APA style.
Research Critique.pptx
This document provides guidelines for critiquing research. It defines a research critique as a critical evaluation of a research report that assesses its strengths and limitations. A critique involves carefully examining all aspects of a study to judge its merits, meaning and significance. It is important as it helps advance nursing knowledge and encourages evidence-based practice. The document outlines the process and elements to consider when critiquing different types of research, including assessing the research problem, methodology, results and conclusions. It provides criteria for evaluating both quantitative and qualitative studies to allow for a systematic and unbiased examination of a research report.
How do they describe their research methods document 15.docx
Research Methodologies
Quantitative Research Measures
When you are considering a quantitative approach to your research, you need to identify why types of measures you will use in your study. This will determine what type of numbers you will be using to collect your data. There are four levels of measurement:
Nominal: These are numbers where the order of the numbers do not matter. They aim to identify separate information. One example is collecting zip codes from research participants. The order of the numbers does not matter, but the series of numbers in each zip code indicate different information (Adamson and Prion, 2013).
Ordinal: Also known as rankings because the order of these numbers matter. This is when items are given a specific rank according to specific criteria. A common example of ordinal measurements include ranking-based questionnaires, where participants are asked to rank items from least favorite to most favorite. Another common example is a pain scale, where a patient is asked to rank their pain on a scale from 1 to 10 (Adamson and Prion, 2013).
Interval: This is when the data are ordered and the distance between the numbers matters to the researcher (Adamson and Prion, 2013). The distance between each number is the same. An example of interval data is test grades.
Ratio: This is when the data are ordered and have a consistent distance between numbers, but has a “zero point.” This means that there could be a measurement of zero of whatever you are measuring in your study (Adamson and Prion, 2013). An example of ratio data is measuring the height of something because the “zero point” remains constant in all measurements.
Critique
1) The document provides guidelines for critiquing a research study, outlining important aspects that should be evaluated such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion.
2) Key areas that are assessed include whether the problem and objectives are clearly defined, the sampling and data collection methods are appropriate, the data is analyzed correctly, and the conclusions are supported by the results.
3) A successful critique answers questions about each component of the study and evaluates whether the report achieves the purpose of research through rigorous methodology and meaningful findings.
Medicalwriting
This document provides guidelines for writing medical research articles. It discusses the typical structure, which includes a title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. Key sections are summarized as follows:
The introduction presents the research question and gaps in existing knowledge. The methods section describes the study design, participants, techniques, and statistical analysis. The results section communicates the findings without interpreting them. The discussion section analyzes the results, considers limitations, and identifies remaining gaps to be addressed in future research. Authorship is based on substantial intellectual contributions to conception, design, analysis, and approval of the final version.
Answer SheetVariablesList the major study variables, an.docx
Answer Sheet:
Variables
List the major study variables, and categorize them as research variables or independent and dependent variables.
Discuss how well the variables reflect the concepts from the theory framework.
List the demographic variables measured in the study, and any extraneous variables identified by the authors. Evaluate whether or not there are missing demographic variables, in your opinion.
Research Design
Identify the specific study design. Explain whether the design was appropriate to answer the study’s research questions/ hypotheses.
Briefly describe the study procedures, including recruitment, screening for eligibility, consent, timing & method of measurement of demographic & key study variables, and intervention, if applicable.
Discuss the clarity of description of study procedures. In other words, could another researcher replicate the study using the procedures described in the article?
If more than one group was included in the study, explain how participants were assigned to groups.
Describe any threats to design validity mentioned by the authors. If they did not describe that, then say so.
Describe the limits of generalizability (external validity).
Population, Sample, & Setting
What was the population for the study?
Identify the specific sampling method used for the study. Discuss the adequacy of the sampling method for producing a sample representative of the population.
Discuss potential biases with the sampling method used.
Identify and evaluate the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the study.
Discuss how the planned sample size was determined (including power analysis & consideration of potential attrition if included).
Discuss actual sample size attained for the study, including acceptance rate, refusal rate, and attrition rate.
Describe study setting and its appropriateness for the study.
Reference List
.
Total Possible Score 3.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
Total Possible Score: 3.00
General Content/Subject Knowledge
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.
Proficient - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.
Basic - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.
Below Expectations - Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.
Non-Performance - There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.
Critical Thinking
Total: 0.30
Distinguished - Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
Proficient - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
Basic - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
Non-Performance - There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.
Written Communication
Total: 0.15
Distinguished - Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.
Below Expectations - Displays limited control o ...
Examiners Expectations from PhD Thesis
The document outlines the expectations of 15 examiners for a research thesis. In general, examiners expect the thesis to:
1) Make an academic, practical, or social contribution and ask rigorous research questions addressed through an appropriate methodology.
2) Have a precise title that describes what was done and not be too ambitious.
3) Include an in-depth, relevant literature review of seminal and highly cited works that shows a deep understanding beyond the specific context.
4) Have a sound conceptualization supported by theory that leads to clear hypotheses or a conceptual framework.
5) Use valid and appropriate quantitative and qualitative methods, measures, and analyses to properly justify the methodology and interpret all findings.
Culturas de mercado A) Empoderar a los empleados para que asuman .pdf
Culturas de mercado tienden a empoderar a empleados para asumir riesgos, conducir hacia la productividad, ganancias y satisfacción del cliente, y dedicar recursos a contratar y desarrollar empleados, aunque a veces son ineficaces. Se evalúa la efectividad con medidas como eficiencia, puntualidad, calidad, seguridad y confiabilidad.
Current Event #2 - summarize a recent business article from a source.pdf
Current Event #2 - summarize a recent business article from a source of your choice and provide
your reaction to the story.
Instructions
Provide the title, source, and date of the article.
an explanation of how it is related to our course.
a clear and concise summary of the article in your words.
your reaction to the story..
More Related Content
Similar to Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. Citation Tr.pdf
Pg writing about your methodology webinar
This document provides guidance on writing the methodology chapter or section of a research paper or dissertation. It explains that the methodology section describes how the research was conducted and why particular methods were chosen. The document offers tips for structuring the chapter, with sections on philosophy/paradigm, methodology, research methods, research design, and analysis. It suggests justifying choices by addressing questions about the appropriateness and limitations of the methodology and methods. Sample paragraphs demonstrate how to justify choices of qualitative methodology and individual interviews as the data collection method. The document stresses the importance of a detailed research design section and considering issues like reliability and validity. Overall, it aims to help researchers explain their research process and choices in their methodology chapter or section.
Research Critique.pptx
This document provides guidance on how to conduct a critical appraisal or critique of a research report. It emphasizes that a critique requires careful examination of all aspects of a study, including its methodology, analysis, and conclusions. The critique should objectively assess both the strengths and limitations of the research. Key aspects that should be evaluated include the study's design, sampling approach, data collection and analysis methods, and whether ethical standards were upheld. The critique aims to advance scientific knowledge by helping to identify ways future studies could be improved.
Critical appraisal
This document provides guidelines for evaluating scientific papers and theses. It outlines the key elements that should be assessed for each section, including the title, abstract, introduction, objectives, methods, results, discussion, and references. For each section, important criteria are listed to determine if the content is appropriate and follows best practices. The goal is to facilitate a thorough criticism of each paper by providing a standardized set of items to consider for evaluation.
Running head QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE1QUANTITATIVE RESEA.docx
Running head: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 1
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 5
Quantitative Research Critique
[Student’s Name]
PSY 326 Research Design
[Instructor’s Name]
[Date submitted]
Quantitative Research Critique
Introduction
[Instructions for using this template: Replace the text in brackets on the title page with your information. Answer the questions and provide the required information indicated below, in the order these items are presented. Use complete sentences in your response and delete the question or instruction, including this paragraph, after you have finished typing your answers. Throughout the paper, cite the source of the information. List the references for all sources that are cited, as indicated in the note on the References page.]
What is your purpose for writing this paper?
What is the title of the study you are critiquing, and who are the authors?
Summarize the research question(s) in your own words as much as possible. If your instructor allows quotes and you find it necessary to quote from the article, use quotation marks around the quoted passage and cite the quote in APA format with author’s last name, year of publication, and page number where the quoted material appeared.
State the hypothesis being tested in the research.
Briefly summarize background information on the topic from the study’s literature review.
Comment on whether or not there is any apparent bias in the selection of studies in the literature review.
Summary of Methods
Was this quantitative study experimental or non-experimental? How can you tell?
If the study was non-experimental, was it descriptive or was it correlational?
Name the sampling method and describe how the participants were selected.
How did the researchers collect data from the participants?
Did the researchers use validated instruments for data collection?
What statistical procedures were used to analyze the data?
What efforts were made to ensure validity and reliability? If none were apparent, note this fact in your critique.
Summary of Results
What statistically significant results were found in the study?
Was there an estimate of the practical significance or effect size of the results?
Did the researchers’ conclusion follow logically from the statistical results? Explain your reasoning.
Ethical Aspects
Did the researchers explicitly address ethical issues in the article? If not, was there evidence in the report that the participants’ wellbeing and confidentiality were protected?
Was an approval process by an Institutional Review Board or similar ethics review committee mentioned?
Were any of the practices ethically questionable? If so, what could have been done to resolve these issues?
Evaluation of Study
Referring to a source about the research design and methods used in this study to support your evaluation, do you feel the researchers used these methods appropriately to investigate the research question?
What do you see as the strengths of how this study ...
New microsoft office word document
This document provides a format for a scientific report, outlining the typical sections including an abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. The abstract describes the issue, why it is important, and key findings. The introduction discusses the problem, current research, and how the author plans to address it. The methods section explains how data was collected and evaluated. Results present the findings, and discussion analyzes the meaning, conclusions, and broader context of the results.
mixed method research.pptx
This document discusses mixed methods research design. It begins by defining mixed methods research as involving collecting and integrating both quantitative and qualitative data within a single research project to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon being studied. It then outlines the typical structure of a mixed methods research proposal, including an introduction with basic information, a section on the research topic, and a research plan section. The research plan section often includes a literature review and details on the specific mixed methods design and data collection methods. The document provides examples of five primary mixed methods designs: sequential explanatory, sequential exploratory, convergent parallel, embedded, and transformative.
List of articles that were used in past papers that cannot be used
This document provides guidance for writing a research critique assignment on a nursing-related research article. It lists topics that must be addressed in the critique, including describing the research problem, reviewing the literature, discussing the theoretical framework, methodology, data analysis, conclusions, and implications for nursing. The critique must be 4-6 pages plus a cover page and reference page, and follow APA style. Articles used previously or that are review articles cannot be selected.
Research Method.ppt
The document discusses research methods and definitions. It defines research as a systematic process of inquiry to discover facts or theories. Research methodology involves defining the problem, objectives, literature review, methodology, subjects, design, data collection, analysis and bibliography. Methods of data collection discussed include questionnaires, interviews and observations. Questionnaires can be closed-ended, open-ended, use scales or checklists. Interviews allow more in-depth information but take more time.
Research in Social Psychology [WLOs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs 1, 2, 3.docx
Research in Social Psychology [WLOs: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
To prepare for this discussion, please read
Chapter 1: Studying Social Psychology
of your textbook and
Exploring the Ethics and Psychological Impact of Deception in Psychological Research
article.
In this discussion, you will consider principles of scientific research, including methodology and ethical considerations.
First, visit the
Online Social Psychology Studies (Links to an external site.)
web page and select any study from the list. (Note that some links may be broken; if you choose a study that is unavailable, simply pick another option.) Participate in the research by following the instructions. After you have completed the study, answer the following questions (see Chapter 1 and Boynton, Portnoy, & Johnson, 2013):
Indicate
the study you completed, including the web link.
Describe
the research that was conducted. What did you do? What type of method do you think the researcher was utilizing? Can you identify the hypothesis and/or theory?
Appraise
the study based on your understanding of research gained from the reading. What elements of the study “worked” and what would you suggest the researchers do to improve their study? Mention at least three specific elements.
Indicate
any relevant ethical concerns. Was deception utilized?
Identify
situational factors and/or social and cultural influences that may impact the phenomenon being studied.
Illustrate
how this insight may be relevant to your personal or professional life through specific examples.
To fully demonstrate content knowledge and critical thinking in your Research in Social Psychology discussion
Interpret
course concepts explicitly, applying them to your personal experiences/observations, and cite the required readings as appropriate.
Be thorough and specific
, structuring your work intentionally (with an introductory and concluding sentence or two), providing clear context, and concisely and precisely explaining relevant course concepts.
Use personal examples
to illustrate as appropriate, but do be sure to provide an objective analysis too,
referencing required materials
and using additional sources as needed to support your insight.
Use your own
Academic Voice
(Links to an external site.)
and apply in-text citations
appropriately throughout your post.
Review
APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)
for more information.
Your original post should be a
minimum of 300 words
.
Social Thinking [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 5]
To prepare for this discussion, please read
Chapter 4: Attitudes, Attributions, and Behaviors
;
Chapter 5: Making Judgments
; and
Chapter 6: Prejudice
of your textbook, and
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
and
Intergroup Contact Theory
articles. In addition, watch
A Class Divided
.
In this discussion, you will consider theoretical perspectives on the formation, maintenance, .
Assignment 1 Mixed Methods Research Manuscript CritiqueIn this mo.docx
Assignment 1: Mixed Methods Research Manuscript Critique
In this module we expanded our knowledge about mixed methodology. ByWednesday, April 15, 2015 complete the following manuscript research critique for the Mixed Method research article you selected in Module 1. Provide feedback to at least two of your peers by Friday, April 17, 2015.
Manuscript Reference:
Andrew J. & Rohm, G. R. (2006). A Mixed-Method Approach for Developing Market Segmentation Typologies in the Sports Industry.
Sport Marketing Quarterly, 15
, 29-39.
Type of Study:
Mixed Method
Research Topic:
Purpose of the Study:
Theoretical Framework: (Identify the theoretical/conceptual framework)
Specific Research Questions/ Philosophical Underpinnings:
Sample:
Mixed method design: (present the elements of quantitative and qualitative and describe how these compliment each other and why it was important or was not important, to conduct this research as a mixed methods design.)
Procedure: (How was the data collected? What was the sampling strategy used?)
Variables/Concepts: (Identify the Dependent and Independent Variables or confounds.)
Instrument(s) analysis: (Discuss reliability, validity and generalizability of the measures included in the study and/or discuss methods for collecting data. Discuss how rigor is assured.)
Data analysis: (Discuss the statistical software, if any, used in analysis of the data and the type of analyses included.)
Consent: (What type of consent, if any, was obtained from the participants?)
All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing
Assignment 2: Mixed Methodology
Your research question may or may not be appropriately answered using a Mixed methodology model. In this assignment you will apply what you have learned aboutmixed methodology from the readings and the Assignment 1 discussion to your own research question. If your research question is best answered using Mixed methodology, stick with it and complete the critique below. If not, how might you alter your question so that it may be answered using mixed methodology? Although research is driven by questions, for this assignment we are going to turn it around so we may explore the benefits and differences of various types of methodologies. Adjust your question to fit a mixed methods design and complete the critique below.
For Example: In assignments M4A2 and M5A2 you may have had to change your research question so that it should be answered using a different design. The example questions included, “What are the perceptions of students regarding their experiences with faculty mentors”, best answered using qualitative research, and “What types of interactions do students value most with their faculty mentors?”, best answered using quantitative research.
Both of the questions would produce information about the topic of effective mentoring of graduate students. In a mixed methods design there is value and need to gather both quantitative and qualitative data. In t.
Research design slide show kd2
The document discusses writing the research design section of a thesis. It explains that the research design justifies the structure and reasoning behind the investigations, not just describing what was done. It discusses the differences between the methodology and methods sections. The methodology explains the reasoning and thinking behind the choice of methods, while methods details the procedures. Both sections require justifying decisions through the literature. The document provides guidance on how to explain and defend the chosen research approach over alternatives in the methodology section. It emphasizes showing how the chosen method will best address the research problem. The methods section should provide enough detail to allow others to replicate the work.
Publishing Research by Dr.Marta Elliot
This document provides guidance on publishing research results in academic journals. It outlines the typical components of a research paper, including an introduction describing the purpose and literature review, methods, results presented in tables and discussed in text, and a discussion and conclusion section. The document also offers tips on selecting an appropriate journal based on its aims and scope, following author instructions carefully, and having others edit the paper before submitting.
APA Style Research Paper
This document provides an overview of different types of research reports and their structure according to APA style. It defines qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research and explains how they each answer different types of research questions. The seven typical parts of a research report are described: title page, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and references. Guidance is provided for each section, highlighting important differences in content and structure depending on the type of research. For example, the method section should describe participants, procedures, instruments, and statistical analysis for quantitative reports but focus more on settings and procedures for qualitative reports. Overall, the document serves as a guide for writing research reports in APA style.
Research Critique.pptx
This document provides guidelines for critiquing research. It defines a research critique as a critical evaluation of a research report that assesses its strengths and limitations. A critique involves carefully examining all aspects of a study to judge its merits, meaning and significance. It is important as it helps advance nursing knowledge and encourages evidence-based practice. The document outlines the process and elements to consider when critiquing different types of research, including assessing the research problem, methodology, results and conclusions. It provides criteria for evaluating both quantitative and qualitative studies to allow for a systematic and unbiased examination of a research report.
How do they describe their research methods document 15.docx
Research Methodologies
Quantitative Research Measures
When you are considering a quantitative approach to your research, you need to identify why types of measures you will use in your study. This will determine what type of numbers you will be using to collect your data. There are four levels of measurement:
Nominal: These are numbers where the order of the numbers do not matter. They aim to identify separate information. One example is collecting zip codes from research participants. The order of the numbers does not matter, but the series of numbers in each zip code indicate different information (Adamson and Prion, 2013).
Ordinal: Also known as rankings because the order of these numbers matter. This is when items are given a specific rank according to specific criteria. A common example of ordinal measurements include ranking-based questionnaires, where participants are asked to rank items from least favorite to most favorite. Another common example is a pain scale, where a patient is asked to rank their pain on a scale from 1 to 10 (Adamson and Prion, 2013).
Interval: This is when the data are ordered and the distance between the numbers matters to the researcher (Adamson and Prion, 2013). The distance between each number is the same. An example of interval data is test grades.
Ratio: This is when the data are ordered and have a consistent distance between numbers, but has a “zero point.” This means that there could be a measurement of zero of whatever you are measuring in your study (Adamson and Prion, 2013). An example of ratio data is measuring the height of something because the “zero point” remains constant in all measurements.
Critique
1) The document provides guidelines for critiquing a research study, outlining important aspects that should be evaluated such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion.
2) Key areas that are assessed include whether the problem and objectives are clearly defined, the sampling and data collection methods are appropriate, the data is analyzed correctly, and the conclusions are supported by the results.
3) A successful critique answers questions about each component of the study and evaluates whether the report achieves the purpose of research through rigorous methodology and meaningful findings.
Medicalwriting
This document provides guidelines for writing medical research articles. It discusses the typical structure, which includes a title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. Key sections are summarized as follows:
The introduction presents the research question and gaps in existing knowledge. The methods section describes the study design, participants, techniques, and statistical analysis. The results section communicates the findings without interpreting them. The discussion section analyzes the results, considers limitations, and identifies remaining gaps to be addressed in future research. Authorship is based on substantial intellectual contributions to conception, design, analysis, and approval of the final version.
Answer SheetVariablesList the major study variables, an.docx
Answer Sheet:
Variables
List the major study variables, and categorize them as research variables or independent and dependent variables.
Discuss how well the variables reflect the concepts from the theory framework.
List the demographic variables measured in the study, and any extraneous variables identified by the authors. Evaluate whether or not there are missing demographic variables, in your opinion.
Research Design
Identify the specific study design. Explain whether the design was appropriate to answer the study’s research questions/ hypotheses.
Briefly describe the study procedures, including recruitment, screening for eligibility, consent, timing & method of measurement of demographic & key study variables, and intervention, if applicable.
Discuss the clarity of description of study procedures. In other words, could another researcher replicate the study using the procedures described in the article?
If more than one group was included in the study, explain how participants were assigned to groups.
Describe any threats to design validity mentioned by the authors. If they did not describe that, then say so.
Describe the limits of generalizability (external validity).
Population, Sample, & Setting
What was the population for the study?
Identify the specific sampling method used for the study. Discuss the adequacy of the sampling method for producing a sample representative of the population.
Discuss potential biases with the sampling method used.
Identify and evaluate the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the study.
Discuss how the planned sample size was determined (including power analysis & consideration of potential attrition if included).
Discuss actual sample size attained for the study, including acceptance rate, refusal rate, and attrition rate.
Describe study setting and its appropriateness for the study.
Reference List
.
Total Possible Score 3.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
Total Possible Score: 3.00
General Content/Subject Knowledge
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.
Proficient - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.
Basic - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.
Below Expectations - Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.
Non-Performance - There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.
Critical Thinking
Total: 0.30
Distinguished - Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
Proficient - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
Basic - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
Non-Performance - There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.
Written Communication
Total: 0.15
Distinguished - Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.
Below Expectations - Displays limited control o ...
Examiners Expectations from PhD Thesis
The document outlines the expectations of 15 examiners for a research thesis. In general, examiners expect the thesis to:
1) Make an academic, practical, or social contribution and ask rigorous research questions addressed through an appropriate methodology.
2) Have a precise title that describes what was done and not be too ambitious.
3) Include an in-depth, relevant literature review of seminal and highly cited works that shows a deep understanding beyond the specific context.
4) Have a sound conceptualization supported by theory that leads to clear hypotheses or a conceptual framework.
5) Use valid and appropriate quantitative and qualitative methods, measures, and analyses to properly justify the methodology and interpret all findings.
Similar to Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. Citation Tr.pdf (20)
Running head QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE1QUANTITATIVE RESEA.docx
Running head QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE1QUANTITATIVE RESEA.docx
List of articles that were used in past papers that cannot be used
List of articles that were used in past papers that cannot be used
Research in Social Psychology [WLOs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs 1, 2, 3.docx
Research in Social Psychology [WLOs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6] [CLOs 1, 2, 3.docx
Assignment 1 Mixed Methods Research Manuscript CritiqueIn this mo.docx
Assignment 1 Mixed Methods Research Manuscript CritiqueIn this mo.docx
How do they describe their research methods document 15.docx
How do they describe their research methods document 15.docx
Answer SheetVariablesList the major study variables, an.docx
Answer SheetVariablesList the major study variables, an.docx
Total Possible Score 3.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
Total Possible Score 3.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
More from ameerandsons
Culturas de mercado A) Empoderar a los empleados para que asuman .pdf
Culturas de mercado tienden a empoderar a empleados para asumir riesgos, conducir hacia la productividad, ganancias y satisfacción del cliente, y dedicar recursos a contratar y desarrollar empleados, aunque a veces son ineficaces. Se evalúa la efectividad con medidas como eficiencia, puntualidad, calidad, seguridad y confiabilidad.
Current Event #2 - summarize a recent business article from a source.pdf
Current Event #2 - summarize a recent business article from a source of your choice and provide
your reaction to the story.
Instructions
Provide the title, source, and date of the article.
an explanation of how it is related to our course.
a clear and concise summary of the article in your words.
your reaction to the story..
cultura y diversidad 1. Paralenguaje se refiere a a. Contacto vi.pdf
cultura y diversidad
1. Paralenguaje se refiere a
a. Contacto visual
b. Conmovedor
C. Rellenos y entonacin
d. Silencio
2. El volumen, el tono y la entonacin se denominan
a. Vocalizacin
b. Rellenos
C. Cualidades no verbales
d. calificadores vocales
3. En la cultura japonesa, el contacto visual intenso es
a. Un signo de honestidad
b. Un signo de inestabilidad y falta de confianza.
C. Una invasin de la privacidad
4. En cul de las siguientes culturas es ms probable que los hombres muestren su ira a travs de
grandes gestos?
a. Arabia Saudita
b. Japn
C. Porcelana
d. Nueva Zelanda
5. Cul de los siguientes no ayuda a examinar el momento de los intercambios hablados?
a. Quin inicia la comunicacin?
b. Qu idioma usan los hablantes?
C. Cul es el comportamiento aceptable para interrumpir al hablante?
d. Cules son los patrones de frecuencia de intercambio?
6. Cul de las siguientes afirmaciones no es verdadera?
a. Cuando los empresarios alemanes se encuentran, se dan la mano.
b. Los empresarios de Amrica Latina se tocan con frecuencia mientras hablan.
C. Los japoneses evitan el contacto personal cuando hablan entre ellos.
d. Los maores de Nueva Zelanda se besan al encontrarse
7. El tamao y la ubicacin de la oficina son smbolos de estatus y poder. Esta afirmacin es ms
apropiada para
a. Japn
b. Porcelana
C. Los Estados Unidos
d. Egipto
8. El acuerdo de oficina abierta en Japn enfatiza
a. La importancia del grupo.
b. Falta de confianza para los trabajadores individuales.
C. La jerarqua en la organizacin.
d. El papel del individuo
9. Quin de los siguientes se sentira ms cmodo con el silencio durante una conversacin? un
gerente de
a. Los Estados Unidos
b. Alemania
C. Gran Bretaa
d. Japn
10. Seales de comunicacin no verbal
a. Son especficos de la cultura
b. Cambian con el tiempo
C. Varan dentro de las culturas
d. Todas son correctas.
Cryptography13.Consider the following matrix with entries from E,.pdf
Cryptography
13.Consider the following matrix with entries from E,
(a) What is the determinant of E?
(b) Is E invertible modulo 26? Why or why not?
(c) If E is invertible modulo 26, find its inverse modulo 26.
(d) Use E to encrypt the message HELP.
(e) What message or messages encrypt to XXXX?
E=[21379].
Cuatro tendencias principales que afectan el comercio mundial a prin.pdf
Cuatro tendencias principales que afectan el comercio mundial a principios del siglo XXI son
una disminucin gradual del proteccionismo econmico ejercido por pases individuales, la
integracin formal y el libre comercio entre naciones, el surgimiento de un espacio de mercado
global en red y:.
Cuando una encuesta mide el compromiso de los empleados de una organ.pdf
Cuando una encuesta mide el compromiso de los empleados de una organizacin, mide
"elementos de retencin" y "elementos de compromiso". Cual es la diferencia? Los elementos de
retencin incluyen pago, beneficios o un paquete de compensacin completo. Estos son elementos
que mantienen a un empleado trabajando, pero no crean compromiso. Los empleados se quedarn
con una empresa que los compense bien. Pero esto no significa que vayan ms all para lograr sus
objetivos o los objetivos de la organizacin. Los elementos de compromiso, por otro lado, son
aquellos elementos que empujan a un empleado de un dron de trabajo a un miembro activo y
comprometido de un equipo de trabajo que promueve los objetivos de la organizacin. Las
recompensas y el reconocimiento son un ejemplo de un elemento de compromiso. Cuando un
empleado es reconocido por sus contribuciones frente a sus compaeros, por ejemplo, su nivel de
compromiso aumenta. Otros elementos del compromiso incluyen la responsabilidad/propiedad
de los empleados, el liderazgo, la cultura, la visin de la empresa y la responsabilidad corporativa.
Mensaje de debate Seleccione un elemento de compromiso de la siguiente lista:
recompensas/reconocimiento responsabilidad de los empleados/propiedad liderazgo cultura visin
de la empresa responsabilidad corporativa Encuentre una empresa que est ejerciendo bien el
elemento de compromiso elegido. Haga una redaccin rpida de esa empresa y cmo mantienen a
sus empleados comprometidos con ese elemento..
Cuenta Saldo 31122013 Saldo 31122014 Depreciaci�n acumulada $2.pdf
Cuenta Saldo 31/12/2013 Saldo 31/12/2014
Depreciacin acumulada $2,019 $2,669
Cuentas por pagar $1,799 $2,067
Cuentas por cobrar $2,489 $2,689
Efectivo $1,302 $1,087
Acciones comunes $4,986 $4,986
Inventario $5,796 $6,040
Deuda a largo plazo $7,809 $8,207
Planta, propiedad y equipo $8,409 $9,206
Utilidades retenidas $1,383 $1,093
a. Construya un balance general para 2013 y 2014.
b. enumere todas las cuentas de capital de trabajo.
C. Encuentre el capital de trabajo neto para los aos que terminaron en 2013 y 2014.
d. calcule el cambio en el capital de trabajo neto para el ao 2014.
a. Construya un balance general para 2013 y 2014.
Complete el balance general de 2013 a continuacin: (Redondee al dlar ms cercano).
Corporacin romana
Balance General al 31 de diciembre de 2013 y 31 de diciembre de 2014
ACTIVOS
2013
2014
PASIVO
2013
2014
Activos circulantes
Pasivo circulante
ps
ps
ps
Total pasivos corrientes
ps
ps
ps
Total de activos corrientes
ps
Responsabilidad total
ps
Activos fijos
CAPITAL DEL PROPIETARIO
ps
ps
ps
ps
ps
Patrimonio total de los propietarios
ps
PASIVOS TOTALES Y
LOS ACTIVOS TOTALES
ps
CAPITAL DEL PROPIETARIO
ps
Complete el balance general de 2014 a continuacin: (Redondee al dlar ms cercano).
Corporacin romana
Balance General al 31 de diciembre de 2013 y 31 de diciembre de 2014
ACTIVOS
2013
2014
PASIVO
2013
2014
Activos circulantes
Pasivo circulante
ps
ps
ps
Total pasivos corrientes
ps
ps
ps
Total de activos corrientes
ps
Responsabilidad total
ps
Activos fijos
CAPITAL DEL PROPIETARIO
ps
ps
ps
ps
ps
Patrimonio total de los propietarios
ps
PASIVOS TOTALES Y
LOS ACTIVOS TOTALES
ps
CAPITAL DEL PROPIETARIO
ps
b. enumere todas las cuentas de capital de trabajo. (Seleccione la mejor respuesta).
A.
Las cuentas de capital de trabajo son los activos circulantes y los activos fijos de la empresa.
B.
Las cuentas de capital de trabajo son los activos corrientes y los pasivos corrientes de la
empresa.
C.
Las cuentas de capital de trabajo son los activos corrientes y los pasivos a largo plazo de la
empresa.
D.
Las cuentas de capital de trabajo son el activo circulante y el pasivo total de la empresa.
C. Encuentre el capital de trabajo neto para los aos que terminaron en 2013 y 2014.
El capital de trabajo neto para el ao que finaliza en 2013 es
$ nada.
(Redondee al dlar ms cercano). El capital de trabajo neto para el ao que finaliza en 2014 es
$ nada.
(Redondear al dlar ms cercano).
d. calcule el cambio en el capital de trabajo neto para el ao 2014.
El cambio en el capital de trabajo neto para el ao 2014 es
$ nada.
(Redondear al dlar ms cercano).
Corporacin romana
Balance General al 31 de diciembre de 2013 y 31 de diciembre de 2014
ACTIVOS
2013
2014
PASIVO
2013
2014
Activos circulantes
Pasivo circulante
ps
ps
ps
Total pasivos corrientes
ps
ps
ps
Total de activos corrientes
ps
Responsabilidad total
ps
Activos fijos
CAPITAL DEL PROPIETARIO
ps
ps
ps
ps
ps
Patrimonio total de los propietarios
ps
PASIVOS TOTALES Y
LOS ACTIVOS TOTALES
ps
CAPITAL DEL PROPIET.
Cuando una empresa instala filiales que producen algunos de los insu.pdf
Cuando una empresa instala filiales que producen algunos de los insumos utilizados en la
produccin, qu estrategia de diversificacin est ejecutando?
diversificacin no relacionada
diversificacin de conglomerados
integracin vertical hacia atrs
integracin vertical hacia adelante
diversificacin no relacionada
diversificacin de conglomerados
integracin vertical hacia atrs
integracin vertical hacia adelante.
Cuando un proceso no est� bajo control que significa No est� haci.pdf
Cuando un proceso no est bajo control que significa?
No est haciendo lo que siempre ha hecho. Slo est presente la variacin de causa comn. es estable
es predecible Todo lo anterior..
Cuando un proyectil (una roca del espacio, digamos) golpea la superf.pdf
Cuando un proyectil (una roca del espacio, digamos) golpea la superficie de la Luna, cul de los
siguientes NO obtenemos?
un crter
una manta de eyeccin
crteres secundarios
una plataforma accidentada (o pendiente) montaosa de material expulsado
un chorro de mucha agua que se haba congelado dentro del suelo en la Luna fra, pero se calienta
brevemente por el impacto
PREGUNTA 24
Cul de los ocho planetas tiene una masa menor que Mercurio?
Tierra
Venus
Jpiter
Neptuno
No me puedes engaar, Mercurio tiene la masa ms pequea de los ocho planetas.
3 puntos
PREGUNTA 25
Cul de los siguientes est hecho del material ms denso?
Mercurio
la luna
la tierra
todos los anteriores tienen la misma densidad
no lo sabemos, porque no hemos medido la densidad de ningn otro planeta excepto la Tierra
un crter
una manta de eyeccin
crteres secundarios
una plataforma accidentada (o pendiente) montaosa de material expulsado
un chorro de mucha agua que se haba congelado dentro del suelo en la Luna fra, pero se calienta
brevemente por el impacto.
Cuando se trata de evaluaciones de desempe�o, los supervisores y los.pdf
Cuando se trata de evaluaciones de desempeo, los supervisores y los titulares a menudo ven el
proceso desde diferentes perspectivas. Cul de los siguientes factores suele verse desde la
perspectiva del supervisor? (Esta es una pregunta de gestin de recursos humanos)
La capacidad del empleado
Falta de cooperacin de otros compaeros de trabajo.
Falta de apoyo al empleado.
Problemas con la maquinaria.
Cuando los lobos regresaron por primera vez a Yellowstone, las pobla.pdf
Cuando los lobos regresaron por primera vez a Yellowstone, las poblaciones de coyotes se
redujeron en casi un 50 %. Qu impacto crees que habra tenido la reduccin de los coyotes en los
zorros? Pista: tanto los zorros como los coyotes comen pequeos mamferos (roedores, conejos,
etc.).
Seleccione uno:
a. Los zorros seran llevados a la extincin.
b. La poblacin de zorros permanecera sin cambios, ya que los lobos estaban matando coyotes,
no zorros.
C. La poblacin de zorros aumentara debido a la menor competencia del coyote por los pequeos
mamferos.
d. Su poblacin se reducira de manera similar a la de los coyotes..
Cuando Joe maximiza la utilidad, encuentra que su MRS de X por Y (o .pdf
Joe encuentra que su tasa marginal de sustitución entre los bienes X e Y es mayor que la tasa de intercambio entre los precios de esos bienes, lo que significa que probablemente no esté consumiendo el bien Y.
Cuando el suministro es de inter�s p�blico Roche y Tamiflu El caso .pdf
Cuando el suministro es de inters pblico: Roche y Tamiflu El caso se centra en los desafos de
Roche para mantener una red de suministro para una iniciativa mundial de respuesta a la
pandemia de influenza basada en su medicamento antiviral Tamiflu. El grupo Roche es una
empresa de 40 mil millones de francos suizos que consta de una divisin farmacutica y una divisin
de diagnstico. El frmaco antiviral de la compaa, Tamiflu, domina el mercado para la prevencin y
el tratamiento de la influenza estacional (gripe). Sin embargo, Tamiflu tambin podra desempear
un papel importante en la respuesta a la primera ola de una pandemia causada por una cepa
particularmente daina del virus de la influenza A. Tamiflu fue diseado para ser efectivo contra
cualquier cepa de influenza tipo A o B. Por lo tanto, exista la posibilidad de establecer un plan de
preparacin basado en la creacin de una reserva de la droga junto con un plan adecuado para la
distribucin a la poblacin afectada. El uso de Tamiflu en tal crisis permitira al mundo responder
de inmediato, en lugar de tener que esperar el desarrollo de una vacuna que tena limitaciones en
su efectividad y el medicamento haba sido respaldado por la OMS como primera lnea de
defensa. El caso se centra en los desafos de Roche para mantener una red de suministro para una
iniciativa global de respuesta a una pandemia. Administrar el suministro es particularmente
desafiante por tres razones. En primer lugar, la demanda de cantidades almacenadas es irregular
e incierta, y los gobiernos que realizan pedidos esperan que los plazos de entrega sean breves. En
segundo lugar, los plazos de entrega para aumentar la capacidad son largos, al igual que los
plazos de entrega para la produccin y encapsulacin de frmacos. Por ltimo, la cobertura de los
medios y los comunicados de prensa realizados por los gobiernos y otras partes interesadas
aumentan las apuestas, ya que la cobertura negativa de los medios puede daar la reputacin de
Roche entre los consumidores, lo que lleva a niveles de ventas ms bajos para sus productos.
Preguntas de tarea:
4. Cmo puede Roche mantener viva su red de suministro? Deberia?
5. Si pudiera cambiar el comportamiento de una de las partes interesadas en el caso, quin sera?
Cmo podra cambiar el comportamiento y con qu efecto pretendido?.
Cuando escuchas la palabra liderazgo, �qu� te viene a la mente Co.pdf
Cuando escuchas la palabra liderazgo, qu te viene a la mente?
Comparta dos palabras que asocie con el liderazgo. Ingrese cada palabra/respuesta en los
cuadros de entrada de texto provistos.
Sus dos palabras pueden ser cualquier parte del discurso (sustantivos, adjetivos, verbos).
Introduzca sus dos palabras por separado. NO ingrese oraciones completas.
Reflexin: Qu es el liderazgo? (Nube de palabras).
Cuando el fago lambda de tipo salvaje se sembra en placas en un c�sp.pdf
Cuando el fago lambda de tipo salvaje se sembra en placas en un csped de Escherichia coli de
tipo salvaje susceptible, se forman placas grandes con apariencia de huevo frito.
Sorprendentemente, el cultivo en placa de un mutante de lambda con doble delecin gam+red en
el csped bacteriano produce generalmente muy pocas y pequeas placas. Por el contrario, se
forman ms placas y ms grandes cuando el mutante por delecin gam+red alberga una mutacin
(chi)- adicional.
i) Cul cree que es la(s) razn(es) de la formacin de las placas de "huevo frito" cuando el fago
lambda de tipo salvaje se coloca en placa sobre E. coli susceptible? Por qu las placas no son
claras como las de T7? [4]
ii) Por qu supone que surgen pocas y pequeas placas despus de sembrar el mutante de doble
delecin gam+red del fago lambda en el csped, mientras que se forman placas cada vez ms
grandes cuando se sembra el mutante de delecin del fago, que lleva una mutacin chi adicional?
Proporcione una explicacin detallada de su respuesta refirindose a todos los procesos
moleculares y protenas involucrados. [diecisis].
Cualquier ayuda es bienvenida. Jayne Butterfield, una madre solter.pdf
Cualquier ayuda es bienvenida.
Jayne Butterfield, una madre soltera con tres hijos, viva en Sacramento, California. Sarah
Huckleberry tambin vivi en California hasta que se mud a la ciudad de Nueva York para abrir y
operar una galera de arte. Huckleberry le pidi a Butterfield que administrara la galera bajo un
contrato de un ao por un salario anual de $90,000. Para comenzar a trabajar, Butterfield se mud a
Nueva York. Como parte de la mudanza, Butterfield transfiri la custodia de sus hijos a su esposo,
quien viva en Londres, Inglaterra. Al aceptar el trabajo, Butterfield tambin perdi los pagos de
pensin alimenticia y manutencin de los hijos de su esposo, incluidos montos impagos de casi
$45,000. Antes de que Butterfield comenzara a trabajar, Huckleberry repudi el contrato. Al no
poder encontrar empleo por ms de un salario anual de $30,000, Butterfield se mud a Londres
para estar cerca de sus hijos. Present una demanda en un tribunal estatal de California contra
Huckleberry, en busca de daos y perjuicios por incumplimiento de contrato. Debera el tribunal
sostener, como argument Huckleberry, que Butterfield no tom medidas razonables para mitigar
sus daos? Por qu o por qu no?.
CS520 Computer Architecture Project 2 � Spring 2023 Due date 0326.pdf
CS520 Computer Architecture Project 2 Spring 2023 Due date: 03/26/2023 1. RULES (1) You
are allowed to work in a group of not more than two students per group, where both members
must have an important role in making sure all members are working together. (2) All groups
must work separately. Cooperation between groups is not allowed. (3) Sharing of code between
groups is considered cheating and will receive appropriate action in accordance with University
policy. The TAs will scan source code through various tools available to us for detecting
cheating. Source code that is flagged by these tools will be dealt with severely. (4) You must do
all your work in C/C++. (5) Your code must be compiled on remote.cs.binghamton.edu or the
machines in the EB-G7 and EB-Q22. This is the platform where the TAs will compile and test
your simulator. They all have the same software environment. 2. Project Description In this
project, you will construct a simple pipeline with an instruction decoder. 3. Pipeline Fetch (IF)
Decode (ID) Instruction Analyze (IA) Memory (Mem2) EX1 Multiplier (Mul) Memory (Mem1)
Writeback (WB) Register Read (RR) Branch (BR) Adder (Add) Register File Divider (Div)
Forwarding Memory Instruction fetch Data load/store Model simple pipeline with the following
three stages. 1 stage for fetch (IF): fetch an instruction from memory 1 stage for decode (ID):
decode an instruction 1 stage for instruction analyze (IA): analyze an instructions dependency 1
stage for register read (RR): access the register file to read registers 1 stage for adder (Add):
Adder operates on the operands if needed 1 stage for multiplier (Mul): Multiplier operates on the
operands if needed 1 stage for divider (Div): Divider operates on the operands if needed 1 stage
for branch (BR): PC is replaced with the branch destination address if needed 2 stages for
memory (Mem1, Mem2): Access memory if needed 1 stage for register writeback (WB): Write
the result into the register file The pipeline supports 4B fixed-length instructions, which have 1B
for opcode, 1B for destination, and 2B for two operands. The destination and the left operand are
always registers. The right operand can be either register or an immediate value. Opcode (1B)
Destination (1B) Left Operand (1B) Right Operand (1B) Opcode (1B) Destination (1B) Operand
(2B) Opcode (1B) None (3B) Instruction: The supported instructions have 14 different types, as
listed in the following table. Note that arithmetic operations, add, sub, mul, and div, now require
at least 1 register operand. The pipeline only supports integer arithmetic operations with 16
integer registers (R0 R15), each is 4B. All numbers between 0 and 1 are discarded (floor). The
load/store instructions read/write 4B from/to the specified address in the memory map file.
Mnemonic Description Destination (1B) Left Operand (1B) Right Operand (1B) Operand (1B)
Immediate value (2B) set set Rx, #Imm (Set an immediate value to register Rx) Register Rx
Immediate .
Cryptography is designed to turn information into a format that is d.pdf
Cryptography is designed to turn information into a format that is difficult to understand in an
effort to keep information confidential. Cryptography has been used for centuries, with one
cipher being associated with Julius Caesar. Especially over the last few decades, the use and
complexity of cryptography has evolved significantly. As cryptography became a digital security
tool, how has its techniques and complexity changed over the last few decades? Conversely, how
have cryptographic attacks evolved? How do you think cryptography will evolve in the future?.
Croce, Incorporated, is investigating an investment in equipment tha.pdf
Croce, Incorporated, is investigating an investment in equipment that would have a useful life of
12 years. The company uses a discount rate of 17% in its capital budgeting. The net present
value of the investment, excluding the salvage value, is $579,387. (Ignore income taxes.)
How large would the salvage value of the equipment have to be to make the investment in the
equipment financially attractive?.
More from ameerandsons (20)
Culturas de mercado A) Empoderar a los empleados para que asuman .pdf
Culturas de mercado A) Empoderar a los empleados para que asuman .pdf
Current Event #2 - summarize a recent business article from a source.pdf
Current Event #2 - summarize a recent business article from a source.pdf
cultura y diversidad 1. Paralenguaje se refiere a a. Contacto vi.pdf
cultura y diversidad 1. Paralenguaje se refiere a a. Contacto vi.pdf
Cryptography13.Consider the following matrix with entries from E,.pdf
Cryptography13.Consider the following matrix with entries from E,.pdf
Cuatro tendencias principales que afectan el comercio mundial a prin.pdf
Cuatro tendencias principales que afectan el comercio mundial a prin.pdf
Cuando una encuesta mide el compromiso de los empleados de una organ.pdf
Cuando una encuesta mide el compromiso de los empleados de una organ.pdf
Cuenta Saldo 31122013 Saldo 31122014 Depreciaci�n acumulada $2.pdf
Cuenta Saldo 31122013 Saldo 31122014 Depreciaci�n acumulada $2.pdf
Cuando una empresa instala filiales que producen algunos de los insu.pdf
Cuando una empresa instala filiales que producen algunos de los insu.pdf
Cuando un proceso no est� bajo control que significa No est� haci.pdf
Cuando un proceso no est� bajo control que significa No est� haci.pdf
Cuando un proyectil (una roca del espacio, digamos) golpea la superf.pdf
Cuando un proyectil (una roca del espacio, digamos) golpea la superf.pdf
Cuando se trata de evaluaciones de desempe�o, los supervisores y los.pdf
Cuando se trata de evaluaciones de desempe�o, los supervisores y los.pdf
Cuando los lobos regresaron por primera vez a Yellowstone, las pobla.pdf
Cuando los lobos regresaron por primera vez a Yellowstone, las pobla.pdf
Cuando Joe maximiza la utilidad, encuentra que su MRS de X por Y (o .pdf
Cuando Joe maximiza la utilidad, encuentra que su MRS de X por Y (o .pdf
Cuando el suministro es de inter�s p�blico Roche y Tamiflu El caso .pdf
Cuando el suministro es de inter�s p�blico Roche y Tamiflu El caso .pdf
Cuando escuchas la palabra liderazgo, �qu� te viene a la mente Co.pdf
Cuando escuchas la palabra liderazgo, �qu� te viene a la mente Co.pdf
Cuando el fago lambda de tipo salvaje se sembra en placas en un c�sp.pdf
Cuando el fago lambda de tipo salvaje se sembra en placas en un c�sp.pdf
Cualquier ayuda es bienvenida. Jayne Butterfield, una madre solter.pdf
Cualquier ayuda es bienvenida. Jayne Butterfield, una madre solter.pdf
CS520 Computer Architecture Project 2 � Spring 2023 Due date 0326.pdf
CS520 Computer Architecture Project 2 � Spring 2023 Due date 0326.pdf
Cryptography is designed to turn information into a format that is d.pdf
Cryptography is designed to turn information into a format that is d.pdf
Croce, Incorporated, is investigating an investment in equipment tha.pdf
Croce, Incorporated, is investigating an investment in equipment tha.pdf
Recently uploaded
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP Module
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Advanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Recently uploaded (20)
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. Citation Tr.pdf
- 1. Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. Citation Triandis, H. C. (1994). Cross- cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 103172). Consulting Psychologists Press. Critique this article by explaining following terms: Summary:Research problem Research goal Hypothesis Research Questions Research Method (briefly explain) Sample (participants) Tools (instruments, tests, surveys) Main findings (brief summary of the results) Conclusion Critique: Is the research important? Why? what methods and procedures were used? Evaluate the methods and procedures. Evaluate the sampling method and the sample used in this study. What type of research is this? Explain. How was the data analyzed? What is (are) the major finding(s)? Are these findings important? Do you agree or disagree with the findings? How does the findings/research compare to what we have been learning in class? Provide examples of workplace applicability. If you determine that the article cannot be applied effectively to the workplace, explain why or why not. What impact has this article had on your thinking?