Cross-CRP gender research sites


                   Patti Kristjanson
CCAFS Research Leader/Senior Scientist, World Agroforestry Center

                      Gender Investors Meeting
                          Paris June 15th
Implementing in Cross-CRP sites
Proposal: Identify key cross CRP-cutting gender issues and refine
existing approaches to capture them

Implement the new research jointly with other CRP’s in
landscapes/basins/hubs that have been identified as CRP
research sites

Take a 10-year learning approach and catalyze the use of
engagement, communication and capacity strengthening
strategies by all partners aimed at enhancing the likelihood of
achieving outcomes (particularly gender-related ones)
CRP 1.1
 Drought tolerant,
 Water efficient
 crops/varieties/livestock   CCAFS/CRP7
 breeds                      Seasonal weather
 Agroforestry                forecasts
 Feed management             Climate analogues
 Crop residue mgment         Index insurance




   CRP 5
   Improved water,
   soil mgment




Implementing in Hubs, or Gender Sentinel Sites – W. Africa
Desired Impacts
                                                            Increased livelihood resilience,
                                                            improved food security, and
                                                            enhanced environmental function




             Changes In Knowledge Attitudes                 OUTCOMES
                        And Skills
           One or more of the actor groups have better
         understanding and/or skills in: the benefits and                  Changes In Practices
          value of new technologies and crop-livestock-           One or more of the actor groups: use high
             tree systems; diversified livelihood and                 level scenario planning; use new or
           nutrition sources, ecosystem function; land,             enhanced farming system technologies,
              water and biodiversity management,                  seeds and adaptation strategies; diversify
          implications of climate change and adaptation           livelihoods and diets; use new knowledge
            measures, community involvement; how to                about inputs, finance, markets to change
         work in partnership across scales and sectors in          production, consumption and marketing
              an adaptive & problem-oriented way                                    systems

e.g. Mali Actor groups: NARES
(IER), NGO’s (SahelEco,
AMEDD, TreeAid, others),
local women’s groups, local
authorities
Implementing in Hubs, or Gender Sentinel
          Sites – e.g. Khulna Hub, Bangladesh


                    Improved rice &
                    shrimp varieties
                    & mgment


                                Improved land,
                                water mgment
IFPRI: markets,                                  Local
institutions,                                    partners:
policies                                         BRAC,
WEAI;                                            SAVE,
Biofortification,
home gardens            Climate services,
                        Insurance, seed banks
SW Bangladesh ‘Khulna Hub’
                                              Theory of Change/Outcome logic
                              CRP3/CSISA                                             CRP4                CCAFS/CRP7
                                                                                                                                O
       CRP2                     New rice                                          Improved            Improved climate
    New inst’l                 varieties &
                                                          CRP5
                                                                                 homestead             services, climate
                                                                                                                                U
                                                     Improved water                                                             T
  arrangements,              suitable aqua.                                      production           and women-smart
                                                      governance &                                                              P
  policies, credit,            species &                                           systems,              ag practices,
                                                      management
      markets                   mgment                                          diverse diets             insurance             U
                                practices                                                              Seed/food banks          TS

                                                                                                                                A
           EXTENSIONISTS <>FARMER COMMUNITIES<>SEED SECTOR PLAYERS<>NGOs<>
    MICROFINANCE AGENCIES<>WATER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITIES<><>POLICY MAKERs<>CGIAR
                                                                                                                                C
              RESEARCHERS<>NARS<>WOMENS GROUPS<>DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES                                                            T
                                                                                                                                O
                            CHANGES IN KNOWLEDGE ATTITUDES AND SKILLS                                                           R
One or more of the actor groups have better understanding and/or skills in: the benefits and value of new technologies and      O
 crop/fish varieties; implications of different land use plans, the impacts of external drivers of change on water resources;
community involvement in water mgment; how to work in partnership across scales and sectors in an adaptive & problem-           UT
                                                          oriented way                                                          C
                                                                                                                                O
                                                CHANGES IN PRACTICES                                                            M
  One or more of the actor groups: use high level scenario planning; use tools and effective water governance strategies;       ES
improve planning of water infrastructure; use new farm-level technologies, seeds and adaptation strategies; private sector
                involvement in the agriculture sector including information, finance, markets and inputs;
                                                                                                                                I
                                                                                                                                MP
                         Reduce poverty, improve food security and strengthen livelihood resilience                             A
                          in coastal areas through improved water infrastructure , governance and
                               management, and more productive and diversified farm system
                                                                                                                                C
                                                                                                                                T
Kisumu/Nyando Basin (western Kenya)
                                        Economics of Biochar (Cornell)
                                        MICCA – East African Dairy Development (FAO,
                                    m
                                        ICRAF, ILRI, KARI, private sector partners)
                                        COMART Community-led assets/value chains
                                        CARE – carbon payments to smallholders
                                        ICRAF – GHG measurement in complex
                                        landscapes
                                        Vi Agroforestry – SLM, carbon payments
                                        CCAFS Participatory Action Research – with ILRI,
  Lake Victoria
                                        Vi, World Neighbours, CBOs, Min of Ag, Min of
                  CCAFS Baseline site   LS, KARI: training, K sharing, etc in range of
                  CARE, PAR
                                        improved SWLM
                                        CIAT-TSBF - legumes and N-fixation through the
                                        legume Africa network
Yellow squares: 10x10km2 ICRAF          CIMMYT/KARI - Insect and Striga resistant and
long-run soils research blocks          drought tolerant Maize

CCAFS & CRP5 (land & water): integrating socioeconomic and biophysical information
to help achieve outcome of improved SWLM actions on the ground!

Cross CRP gender sites

  • 1.
    Cross-CRP gender researchsites Patti Kristjanson CCAFS Research Leader/Senior Scientist, World Agroforestry Center Gender Investors Meeting Paris June 15th
  • 2.
    Implementing in Cross-CRPsites Proposal: Identify key cross CRP-cutting gender issues and refine existing approaches to capture them Implement the new research jointly with other CRP’s in landscapes/basins/hubs that have been identified as CRP research sites Take a 10-year learning approach and catalyze the use of engagement, communication and capacity strengthening strategies by all partners aimed at enhancing the likelihood of achieving outcomes (particularly gender-related ones)
  • 3.
    CRP 1.1 Droughttolerant, Water efficient crops/varieties/livestock CCAFS/CRP7 breeds Seasonal weather Agroforestry forecasts Feed management Climate analogues Crop residue mgment Index insurance CRP 5 Improved water, soil mgment Implementing in Hubs, or Gender Sentinel Sites – W. Africa
  • 4.
    Desired Impacts Increased livelihood resilience, improved food security, and enhanced environmental function Changes In Knowledge Attitudes OUTCOMES And Skills One or more of the actor groups have better understanding and/or skills in: the benefits and Changes In Practices value of new technologies and crop-livestock- One or more of the actor groups: use high tree systems; diversified livelihood and level scenario planning; use new or nutrition sources, ecosystem function; land, enhanced farming system technologies, water and biodiversity management, seeds and adaptation strategies; diversify implications of climate change and adaptation livelihoods and diets; use new knowledge measures, community involvement; how to about inputs, finance, markets to change work in partnership across scales and sectors in production, consumption and marketing an adaptive & problem-oriented way systems e.g. Mali Actor groups: NARES (IER), NGO’s (SahelEco, AMEDD, TreeAid, others), local women’s groups, local authorities
  • 5.
    Implementing in Hubs,or Gender Sentinel Sites – e.g. Khulna Hub, Bangladesh Improved rice & shrimp varieties & mgment Improved land, water mgment IFPRI: markets, Local institutions, partners: policies BRAC, WEAI; SAVE, Biofortification, home gardens Climate services, Insurance, seed banks
  • 6.
    SW Bangladesh ‘KhulnaHub’ Theory of Change/Outcome logic CRP3/CSISA CRP4 CCAFS/CRP7 O CRP2 New rice Improved Improved climate New inst’l varieties & CRP5 homestead services, climate U Improved water T arrangements, suitable aqua. production and women-smart governance & P policies, credit, species & systems, ag practices, management markets mgment diverse diets insurance U practices Seed/food banks TS A EXTENSIONISTS <>FARMER COMMUNITIES<>SEED SECTOR PLAYERS<>NGOs<> MICROFINANCE AGENCIES<>WATER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITIES<><>POLICY MAKERs<>CGIAR C RESEARCHERS<>NARS<>WOMENS GROUPS<>DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES T O CHANGES IN KNOWLEDGE ATTITUDES AND SKILLS R One or more of the actor groups have better understanding and/or skills in: the benefits and value of new technologies and O crop/fish varieties; implications of different land use plans, the impacts of external drivers of change on water resources; community involvement in water mgment; how to work in partnership across scales and sectors in an adaptive & problem- UT oriented way C O CHANGES IN PRACTICES M One or more of the actor groups: use high level scenario planning; use tools and effective water governance strategies; ES improve planning of water infrastructure; use new farm-level technologies, seeds and adaptation strategies; private sector involvement in the agriculture sector including information, finance, markets and inputs; I MP Reduce poverty, improve food security and strengthen livelihood resilience A in coastal areas through improved water infrastructure , governance and management, and more productive and diversified farm system C T
  • 7.
    Kisumu/Nyando Basin (westernKenya) Economics of Biochar (Cornell) MICCA – East African Dairy Development (FAO, m ICRAF, ILRI, KARI, private sector partners) COMART Community-led assets/value chains CARE – carbon payments to smallholders ICRAF – GHG measurement in complex landscapes Vi Agroforestry – SLM, carbon payments CCAFS Participatory Action Research – with ILRI, Lake Victoria Vi, World Neighbours, CBOs, Min of Ag, Min of CCAFS Baseline site LS, KARI: training, K sharing, etc in range of CARE, PAR improved SWLM CIAT-TSBF - legumes and N-fixation through the legume Africa network Yellow squares: 10x10km2 ICRAF CIMMYT/KARI - Insect and Striga resistant and long-run soils research blocks drought tolerant Maize CCAFS & CRP5 (land & water): integrating socioeconomic and biophysical information to help achieve outcome of improved SWLM actions on the ground!

Editor's Notes

  • #6 CRP1.3 on aquatic agriculture systems have brought together many CRPs and centres in this SW Bangladesh ‘hub’; a great opportunity for the CG to work together with a multitude of partners and really target women. IFPRI just implemented the WEAI approach here, and those findings can inform approaches and strategies for enhancing women’s empowerment and achieving food security and other environmental outcomes sought. For example, IFPRI and others have evidence of the nutritional and other positive impacts on women and the poor through targeted work on home gardens in Bangladesh.
  • #8 Some of the research going on is genuine participatory action research that takes a learning approach – e.g. our project with CARE. CARE is doing the ‘action’ – trainings, getting seedlings to groups, etc. Our research (e.g. on institutional and communication issues; strategies for ensuring women will benefit from carbon payments) has been in response to the needs of CARE and other local partners. We are ‘co-creating’ products – e.g. communicating carbon guidelines, …. Other research (e.g. measuring GHG, econ of biochar) is more trad’l, science-driven research (but even here, the NGO partners need this info!) If the trainings and actions re: water, goats, bees, fodder, etc are starting to influence and drive KARI and CG research, then this too will fall more in the PAR category…..