Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Customer Survey Data Analysis Rubric
Similar to Customer Survey Data Analysis Rubric (13)
More from CruzIbarra161
More from CruzIbarra161 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Customer Survey Data Analysis Rubric
- 1. Criteria Ratings Points Content Introduction 19 to >16.0 pts Advanced The introductory paragraph contains a strong thesis statement, research question (s), and/or statement of research purpose and provides an overview of the paper. 16 to >14.0 pts Proficient The introductory paragraph contains a moderately developed thesis statement, research question(s), and/or statement of research purpose. 14 to >0.0 pts
- 2. Developing The thesis statement, research question(s) and overview of the paper need improvement. 0 pts Not Present 19 pts Content Analysis 20 to >18.0 pts Advanced The topic is clearly presented and discussed in detail. Key terms are defined as needed. Complex issues are navigated with precision. 18 to >16.0 pts Proficient The topic is presented and discussed appropriately.
- 3. Key terms are defined as needed. Complex issues are recognized. 16 to >0.0 pts Developing The topic is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations. Contextual factors are weakly considered and lacking in some significant areas. Complex issues are overlooked or handled without care. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts Content Research & Support 19 to >16.0 pts Advanced • Sources are evaluated
- 4. critically for applicability in the paper. • Research may incorporate multiple viewpoints of complex issues. • Arguments are correctly supported with research. 16 to >14.0 pts Proficient • Sources are used correctly. • Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. • Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. • Arguments are correctly supported with research. 14 to >0.0 pts Developing • Sources are used but not critically evaluated. • Arguments incorporate limited research but often include personal opinion without appropriate support. • Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. • Research is not aware of
- 5. multiple viewpoints of complex issues. 0 pts Not Present 19 pts Content Conclusion 15 to >13.0 pts Advanced The conclusion is strong and clearly summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. 13 to >11.0 pts Proficient The conclusion summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. 11 to >0.0 pts Developing The conclusion does not
- 6. adequately summarize the research presented in the body of the paper. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Research Paper Grading Rubric | CJUS810_D02_202130 Criteria Ratings Points Content Christian Worldview 15 to >13.0 pts Advanced Creates Christian Worldview (CWV) Section and applies CWV elements and support in explanation of the training program with specific biblical references (book, chapter, and verse).
- 7. 13 to >11.0 pts Proficient Creates Christian Worldview Section and applies general CWV elements and support in explanation of the training program with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references). 11 to >0.0 pts Developing Christian Worldview mentioned. No specific section in the paper. Only general CWV elements and support in explanation of the training program with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references). 0 pts Not Present
- 8. 15 pts Structure Mechanics 12 to >10.0 pts Advanced • No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. • Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. • Student has proper page count. 8-12 double-spaced pages (or more if page count waived by instructor) not including title page, abstract, or reference section. 10 to >9.0 pts Proficient • Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. • Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient.
- 9. Word choice is adequate. • Student has 70% of the proper page count of 6 page double-spaced pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section. 9 to >0.0 pts Developing • Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. • Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. • Student has less than 70% of the proper page count of 6 page double-spaced pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section. 0 pts Not Present 12 pts Structure
- 10. Mechanics 13 to >10.0 pts Advanced • Citations and format are in current APA style. • Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are correctly formatted. • Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. 10 to >9.0 pts Proficient • Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. • Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are present with few errors. • Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. 9 to >0.0 pts
- 11. Developing • Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. • Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are included though several errors are present. • Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect. 0 pts Not Present 13 pts Research Paper Grading Rubric | CJUS810_D02_202130 Criteria Ratings Points Structure Research Elements 12 to >10.0 pts Advanced • Academic primary and
- 12. .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 11 citations as listed below. • 8 citation must be recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor). Relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. • Must use at least 2 Holy Bible citations. • Must use at least one recent newspaper article on the country of study. • Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non-academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. • The best 11 citations will be graded. 10 to >9.0 pts Proficient • Research is aware of
- 13. multiple viewpoints of complex issues. • Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 70% of the required 11 citations as listed below. • 8 citations must be recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor). Relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. • Must use at least 2 Holy Bible citations. • Must use at least one recent newspaper article on the country of study. • Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non-academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. • The best 11 citations will be graded. 9 to >0.0 pts Developing • Less than 70% of the
- 14. Academic sources required 11 citations as listed below are used. Reliance on popular sources is evident. • An incomplete or inaccurate reference section is provided. • 8 citations must be recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. • Must use at least 2 Holy Bible citations. • Must use at least one recent newspaper article on the country of study. • Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non-academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. • The best 11 citations will be graded. 0 pts Not Present 12 pts
- 15. Total Points: 125 Research Paper Grading Rubric | CJUS810_D02_202130 DocumentationNew Perspectives Excel 2019 | Module 7: End of Module Project 1Pierce SoftwareSUMMARIZE DATA WITH PIVOTTABLESAuthor:Richard FelizNote: Do not edit this sheet. If your name does not appear in cell B6, please download a new copy of the file from the SAM website. Customer Call LogCustomer Call Log: January-MarchCustomer Survey ScoresCall IDDateService RepCall CodeCall TypeQuestion 1Question 2Question 3Question 4AverageRepTotal CallsAverage Score201911/4/21Wagner74524Barry201541/4/21Thanh12131Br uno211701/4/21Darego175555Calder211451/5/21Calder164535 Darego221031/5/21Shanahan214444Shanahan222461/6/21Bruno 184534Thanh221371/7/21Thanh73333Volmann2 22341/7/21Shan ahan12111Wagner232281/7/21Wagner23221Zimmerman232151/ 8/21Calder84332241171/9/21Darego255535241401/9/21Bruno9 3332252241/11/21Thanh34544231261/12/21Volmann255452521 01/12/21Barry123221201891/14/21Wagner211111201261/14/21 Shanahan203442261571/15/21Bruno222322252011/16/21Thanh 164334261491/16/21Calder195455232231/16/21Calder3555524 2411/16/21Bruno174332241521/17/21Thanh185445241961/17/2 1Volmann164335262421/17/21Darego44224271431/17/21Volm ann44333201551/18/21Barry155535211711/18/21Thanh5233222 2271/18/21Shanahan221221201771/20/21Bruno183333271961/2 0/21Zimmerman154434222131/20/21Volmann235544252001/21 /21Barry164455281441/22/21Calder65324281471/22/21Zimmer man34455292151/23/21Thanh173444261281/23/21Bruno545552 91361/24/21Darego164444291821/25/21Zimmerman1732 23241 261/26/21Bruno202132271471/27/21Barry105455281171/28/21 Volmann114455211781/28/21Thanh164333262421/29/21Calder 53223301191/29/21Thanh251111301941/29/21Barry215345212
- 17. 33/25/21Thanh214554332443/26/21Darego204335342453/27/21 Calder224413342463/28/21Shanahan163534342473/28/21Bruno 192354342483/29/21Thanh33143342493/29/21Darego44352342 503/29/21Thanh105513342513/30/21Barry123455342523/30/21 Zimmerman202233 Call Type by RepCall Types by Service Rep Scores by DateAverage Monthly Scores Survey QuestionsCall Type Lookup TableCall Code06111621Call TypeBug reportFeature requestHow toTech problemCancellationCustomer Survey Scores5Very satisfied4Satisfied3Neutral2Dissatisfied1Very dissatisfiedCustomer Survey QuestionsHow satisfied are you with:Question 1The service rep's product knowledgeQuestion 2How much time it took to reach a service repQuestion 3The overall process of contacting Pierce SoftwareQuestion 4How the service rep handled your call CJUS 810 Research Paper Assignment Instructions Overview In developing your expertise in transnational organized crime (TOC) you will be writing a series of research papers. All together the writing contained in all these papers combined would be quite significant project! You will find that in some modules, the research papers mimic our readings with respect to subject matter and some modules, the research papers do not mimic the reading. Again, the goal of these research papers is to stretch the depth and breadth of your knowledge. You should feel well prepared to teach a course in TOCs after completing this course. The research papers and PowerPoints you create could serve as the basis for such class. Additionally, you will find that this course and the course CJUS701 Comparative Criminal Justice Systems complement each other very well. Instructions · Each research paper should be a minimum of 6 to 8 pages. · The vast difference in page count is because some countries
- 18. and/or crime/topics are quite easy to study and some countries and/or crime/topics have very limited information. · In some instances, there will be a plethora of information and you must use skilled writing to maintain proper page count. · Please keep in mind that this is doctoral level analysis and writing – you are to take the hard-earned road – the road less travelled – the scholarly road in forming your paper. · The paper must use current APA style, and the page count does not include the title page, abstract, reference section, or any extra material. · The minimum elements of the paper are listed below. · You must use a minimum of 8 recent (some countries/crimes/topics may have more recent research articles than others), relevant, and academic (peer review journals preferred and professional journals allowed if used judiciously) sources, at least 2 sources being the Holy Bible, and one recent (some countries/crime/topics have more recent than others) news article. Books may be used but are considered “additional: sources beyond the stated minimums. You may use .gov sources as your recent, relevant, and academic sources if the writing is academic in nature (authored works). You may also use United Nations and Whitehouse.gov documents as academic documents. · Again, this paper must reflect graduate level research and writing style. If you need to go over the maximum page count you must obtain professor permission in advance! Please reference the Research Paper Rubric when creating your research paper. These are minimum guidelines – you may expand the topics covered in your papers. 1. Begin your paper with a brief analysis of the following elements: 0. Country analysis 0. Introduction to the country 0. People and society of the country 0. What is the basic government structure?
- 19. 1. Analyze the nature of organized crime in the assigned area (you may narrow the scope of your analysis through your introduction or thesis statement if needed) 1. Analyze the impact of organized crime in the assigned area on the government. 1. Briefly propose policies that may be helpful in mitigating organized crime in the assigned area. 1. A Holy Bible comparison/analysis of the nature of the organized crime system, the impact on the country, or your proposed policy to mitigate the system. The following is an outline of the minimum points to be covered in your paper – Crime Typology Topics: These are minimum guidelines – you may expand the topics covered in your papers... 1. Analyze the nature of assigned crime/issue with respect to (at a minimum): 0. Scope of the crime/issue 0. Financial impact – if possible 0. Human impact – if possible 0. Analysis of various countries laws dealing with the crime/issue. 1. Briefly propose policies that may be helpful in mitigating the crime/topic on a specific country or transnational scale. 1. A Holy Bible comparison/analysis of the crime/topic Page 2 of 2