Criteria Ratings Points Content Thesis and Introduction 10 to >8.0 pts Advanced The thesis or research statement is well constructed; introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. 8 to >7.0 pts Proficient A thesis statement is introduced, conveys a biblical worldview, and aligns with the title and body of the paper. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing The thesis and/or introduction are poorly written or do not align with the title and/or body of the paper. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Content and Focus Content and Focus 20 to >18.0 pts Advanced The content is comprehensive, accurate, and is related to assignment prompt. 18 to >16.0 pts Proficient The content is either: not comprehensive, not accurate, or is not related to the assignment prompt. 16 to >0.0 pts Developing The content is not comprehensive, not accurate, and is not related to assignment prompt. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts Content Major Points and Support 20 to >18.0 pts Advanced The program theory and components are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples of data to be measured should be included; and logically organized. 18 to >16.0 pts Proficient The program theory and components are not stated clearly but are supported by specific details, including data to me measured examples. 16 to >0.0 pts Developing The program theory and components are not stated clearly and are not supported by specific details, examples of data to be measured. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts Content Christian Worldview 10 to >8.0 pts Advanced Dedicated Christian worldview section exists or is woven throughout the paper; showing the integration of the subject matter, critical thinking, and Christian worldview. 8 to >7.0 pts Proficient General tenets of a biblical worldview are introduced and convey a basic understanding of supporting literature. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing Some biblical concepts are presented but may be narrow in scope, not representing the most essential principles, or may not be congruent with supporting literature. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Content Conclusion 10 to >8.0 pts Advanced The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major points. 8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Conclusion is either: not logical, does not flow from the body of the paper, or does not review the major points. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing Conclusion is not logical, does not flow from the body of the paper, and does not review the major points. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 1 – Evaluability Assessment Grading Rubric | CJUS801_D01_202130 Criteria Ratings Points Structure Spelling, Grammar & Format 10 to >8.0 pts Advanced • Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the outline. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • There are 0–1 minor citation errors in current APA format in the requir ...

1. Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Thesis and
Introduction
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The thesis or research
statement is well constructed;
introduction provides sufficient
background on the topic and
previews major points.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
A thesis statement is
introduced, conveys a
biblical worldview, and
aligns with the title and
body of the paper.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The thesis and/or

2. introduction are poorly
written or do not align
with the title and/or body
of the paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Content
and Focus
Content
and Focus
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The content is
comprehensive, accurate, and
is related to assignment
prompt.
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The content is either: not
comprehensive, not
accurate, or is not
related to the
assignment prompt.

3. 16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The content is not
comprehensive, not
accurate, and is not
related to assignment
prompt.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Major
Points and
Support
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The program theory and
components are stated
clearly; are supported by
specific details, examples of
data to be measured should
be included; and logically
organized.

4. 18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The program theory and
components are not
stated clearly but are
supported by specific
details, including data to
me measured examples.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The program theory and
components are not
stated clearly and are not
supported by specific
details, examples of data
to be measured.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Christian
Worldview
10 to >8.0 pts

5. Advanced
Dedicated Christian worldview
section exists or is woven
throughout the paper; showing
the integration of the subject
matter, critical thinking, and
Christian worldview.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
General tenets of a
biblical worldview are
introduced and convey a
basic understanding of
supporting literature.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some biblical concepts
are presented but may
be narrow in scope, not
representing the most
essential principles, or
may not be congruent
with supporting literature.
0 pts
Not
Present

6. 10 pts
Content
Conclusion
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The conclusion is logical,
flows from the body of the
paper, and reviews the major
points.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Conclusion is either: not
logical, does not flow
from the body of the
paper, or does not
review the major points.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Conclusion is not logical,
does not flow from the
body of the paper, and
does not review the
major points.
0 pts

7. Not
Present
10 pts
Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 1 – Evaluability
Assessment
Grading Rubric | CJUS801_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure
Spelling,
Grammar &
Format
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Correct spelling and
grammar are used throughout
the outline. There are 0–2
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content. • There are 0–1
minor citation errors in current
APA format in the required
items. • Overall paper is
structured per APA: running
head, page numbers, title
page, spacing, indentations,

8. margins, and headings.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
• There are 3–5 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from
the content. • There are
2–3 minor citation errors
in current APA format in
the required items.
• Few errors in paper
structure per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title page,
spacing, indentations,
margins, and headings.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• There are 6–10 errors
in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader
from the content. • There
are more than 3 citation
errors in current APA
format in the required
items. • Multiple errors in
paper structure per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title page,
spacing, indentations,

9. margins, and headings.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Structure
Page
Length
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
5-7 double-spaced pages of
content, not counting title
page, abstract, or references.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
1 page more or less than
the required length
range (not counting the
title page or references);
double-spaced.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing

10. More than 1 page more
or less than the required
length range (not
counting the title page or
references);
double-spaced.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Structure
Sources
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Ideas from 5 scholarly
sources must be used.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Ideas from 3-4 scholarly
sources must be used.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing

11. Ideas from less than 3
scholarly sources must
be used.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 1 – Evaluability
Assessment
Grading Rubric | CJUS801_D01_202130
Examine whether competitive pressures are present in your
company’s (Southwest
Airlines/aviation industry) industry with high barriers to entry.
• Must be one to two double-spaced pages in length (not
including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
Writing Center’s APA
Style (Links to an external site.) resource.
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
o Title of paper

12. o Assigned group
o Students’ names in group
o Course name and number
o Instructor’s name
o Date submitted
• For further assistance with the formatting and the title page,
refer to APA Formatting
for Microsoft Word (Links to an external site.).
• Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links
to an external site.) resource
for additional guidance.
• Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your
introduction paragraph
needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the
purpose of your paper.
o For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links
to an external site.)
as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external
site.), refer to the
Writing Center resources.
• Must use at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed, and/or other

13. credible sources in
addition to the course text.
o The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources
(Links to an external
site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source
types. If you have
questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this
assignment,
please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say
about the
appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
• Must document any information used from sources in APA
style as outlined in the
Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an
external site.) guide.
• Must include a separate references page that is formatted
according to APA style as
outlined in the Writing Center. See the Formatting Your
References List (Links to an
external site.) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style

14. https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis
https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359
309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-
Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf
https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359
309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-
Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/forma t-your-reference-list