Toolbox for city planners of the CPaaS.io Project as presented at the final review meeting in February 2019.

1. City Platform as a Service – Integrated and Open
Tools Supporting City Developers
Stephan Haller (BFH)
Final Project Review, Web Conference
February 21, 2019

2. Main Project Outcomes
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium 2

3. «How can we help cities to quicker
achieve their smart city goals?»
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium 3
▪ Framework to compare cities
▪ Providing an initial strategy and
roadmap ready for implementation
Currently Needed
▪ Many cities are embarking on a
road towards becoming a smart city
▪ Still often separate, specific use
cases

4. Dimensions of the
Smart City Strategy Framework
4
• Population
• Development Stage
• Political System
• Education Level
• Pressures
City Context
• Governance Model
• Citizen Involvement
• Motivation
• City Role
• Process Responsibility
• Business Sector Development
• Approach
• Regional Cooperation
Governance
• Implementation Model
• Application Domains
• Performance Measures
Implementation
• Data Infrastructure
• Networking Infra. (WLAN, IoT)
• Cloud Infrastructure
Infrastructure
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

5. The full Smart City Strategy Framework
5
Morphological
Box
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

6. Element Manifestations: Amsterdam
6February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

7. Element Manifestations: Tokyo
7February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

8. Commonalities and differences
in the surveyed cities
8February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

9. Smart City Strategy Framework
Conclusions
▪ Quality of Life as main motivation
▪ Pre-dominance of government-
driven approaches, but PPP gains
in popularity
▪ Platforms are important
▪ Citizen involvement still at a low
level
▪ Framework is useful to analyze
and compare cities in their
approaches
▪ Extensions/modifications
identified
▪ Role of «Smart City Maturity»
and «Cultural Context» needs
to be addressed further
9
About the 6 cities surveyed In general
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

10. «How can we help cities to quicker
implement relevant smart city
applications?»
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium 10
▪ Blueprints to simplify the transfer of a
successful application implementation
to another city
▪ Guides to help cities identify all
aspects that need to be addressed
Currently Needed
▪ Many cities are embarking on a road
towards becoming a smart city
▪ Many cities implement similar use
cases…
▪ … but they often re-invent the wheel

11. Blueprint Structure
11February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

12. Smart City Canvas Example: e-Bern
12
Beneficiaries
• Population of Bern
and surrounding
region («Smart
Capital Region»)
• Private and legal
persons
• Employees in the
city administration
(leaner processes)
Cost Structure
• Staff Costs: Large cost item, 50:50 distribution
between analytical work and implementation
& roll-out work (incl. staff training and info
material for the population)
• Technology Costs: Procurement of
software development and know-how
Revenue Streams /
Saving Potential
• Short-term: Cost savings due to simplified
processes and reduction in FTEs
• Long-term: Tax cuts → increased business
attractivity → more companies in Bern
→ increased tax revenues
Relationships
• Partners: ewb
(energy & water
utility), BernMobil,
BLS, Swiss
Federation (e-ID)
• Opponents:
Political (data
protection issues),
trade unions (fear
of job losses)
• Other
stakeholders:
Citizens, local
companies, city
employees,
political
parties
Key Activities
• Business Analysis
• Requirements
Engineering
• App Development
• Deployment
Key Partners
• Swisscom: Network
Provider
• Post: Technology as
well as Know-How
Partner (PostFinance
Portal as prime
example/model)
• BLS, BernMobil:
Public
Transportation
Providers
Key Resources
• (Regular) Budget
• Human Capital
• Know-How
• Software
Technology
Public Value
Proposition
1. Main goal:
Increased quality of life
• Traffic: Less private
traffic in the inner city,
more public
transportation and
bicycles
• «Participative City»
2. Smart government and
smarter public services
(barrier-free, simpler,
faster)
3. Increased trust in
government by
demonstrating efficiency
and transparency
4. Cost savings within the
administration thanks to
leaner processes
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

13. Usage of Blueprints for Application Transfer
13
Consultation
of existing
Blueprint
One-Pager
Identify
gaps
between
blueprint
and planned
innovation
Validate the
identified
gaps against
the
blueprint
template
Adapt the
blueprint to
own needs
BlueprintAdaptation
Adapted Smart City
Blueprint
Checklists
Existing
Blueprint
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

14. Initial validation with the use cases from the CPaaS.io project as well as
workshops with the city of Bern
First Validation Results
• Well structured, easy to use also for non-
technical people
• Provides benefits for city developers
• Some elements need to be described
better in order to be used stand-alone
• Focus on public value for the city is
important
• Take operational system perspective, not
development/deployment perspective
• Well-structured
• Guidance for what aspects need to be
addressed
• Some elements require better description
to be of use for non-technical people
• Difficulties regarding level of detail
14
Smart City Canvas Blueprint One-Pager
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

15. Blueprint Template
Summary & Outlook
The Smart City Blueprint approach provides cities with a methodology, tools
and a process for developing, documenting and transferring smart city
applications
▪ Smart City Canvas
▪ Blueprint One-Pager
▪ Checklists
▪ …
Well suited for specifying a holistic picture of a specific smart city application
Next validation steps are to use these tools in concrete Smart City
implementation projects
15February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium

16. Gracias Mulțumesc 謝謝 Paldies Eskerrik asko Dziękuję Mahalo ‫תודה‬ Go raibh maith agat спасибо Grazzi आभारी
Xin cảm ơn 감사합니다 நன்றி Köszönöm ‫مرسي‬ Ndiyabulela Grazia Tak Благодаря Aitäh Terima kasih Děkuji
Asante Diolch ‫شكرا‬ Takk Ďakujem Gràcies Kiitos Obrigado Teşekkür ederim Ngiyabonga Þakka þér Grazas
Tapadh leibh ขอบคุณ Faleminderit Ačiū Danke Merci Grazie Hvala Ευχαριστώ Dankon Tack Dank je Grazcha
…
Thank You
ありがとう
This document has been produced in the context of the CPaaS.io project which is jointly funded by the European
Commission (grant agreement n° 723076) and NICT from Japan (management number 18302). All information provided
in this document is provided "as is" and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular
purpose. The user thereof uses the information at its sole risk and liability. For the avoidance of all doubts, the European
Commission and NICT have no liability in respect of this document, which is merely representing the view of the project
consortium. This document is subject to change without notice.
February 2019 © CPaaS.io Project Consortium 16