COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act signed into law by President Biden; Appends existing laws, and makes them stronger, protecting minorities against hate crimes.
11/13/18 Letter To USDOJ & ICC Providing Redacted Affidavit For Criminal Comp...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
The Utica International Embassy’s filing of CRIMINAL COMPLAINT/COMMUNICATION on behalf of its Government Officials/Citizens. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court is sought due to the USA’s FAILURE TO ACT upon the Criminal Complaints submitted, etc. Moreover, FAILURE TO PREVENT, etc. further War Crimes, Apartheid Practices/Crimes Against Humanity, etc. reported by Vogel Denise Newsome (now serving as the Interim Prime Minister of the “NEW” Government of the Utica International Embassy) and OTHERS…
JURISDICTION of the United States of America’s Department of Justice (“USDOJ”) is sought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Part II, 28 U.S.C. § 516, and the applicable Statutes/Laws governing said matters.
JURISDICTION of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) is sought pursuant to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the applicable Statutes/Laws governing said matters regarding this instant Communication/Criminal Complaint and the Situation(s) addressed therein.
The United States Department of Justice’s FAILURE TO ACT upon the Criminal Complaints filed REPORTING the Crimes of the United States of America’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) and others through the 09/17/04 Petition:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/ex-34-091704-petition-seekingintervention-entergymatter
affords the ICC with Jurisdiction to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE; moreover, allows for the Utica International Embassy to INCLUDE the DOMESTIC Terrorist Acts of September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged Targets because these TERRORIST Acts/Acts of TERRORISM were carried out by none other than Baker Donelson and those with whom they CONSPIRED. The 09/17/04 Petition submitted to the USDOJ WAS SUBMITTED “AFTER” the July 1, 2002, date in which the ROME STATUTE Of The International Criminal Court is reported to have been entered into force! Therefore, Legally/Lawfully affording the ICC Jurisdiction to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE these Domestic Terrorist Attacks!
The IMPORTANCE of PRESERVING evidence NO MATTER HOW LONG it takes to seek and GET JUSTICE!
§ 2339C PROHIBITIONS AGAINST THE FINANCING OF TERRORISMVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
§ 2339C PROHIBITIONS AGAINST THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM
The title speaks for itself. Nevertheless, we are posting this information as EVIDENCE of one of the Statutes/Laws under which we will be moving forward and seeking INTERNATIONAL Intervention as a result of the United States DESPOTISM Government Regime’s/Organization’s UNLAWFUL and ILLEGAL SEIZURE of the United States of America’s Government!
We look forward to Legally and Lawfully obtaining INTERNATIONAL Assistance as we move forward to BUILDING a NEW GOVERNMENT that will PROTECT the Natives and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color residing within the Lands/Territories NOW known as the United States of America FROM the NAZI and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists that have INFILTRATED and/or HIJACKED the United States of America’s Government and are PRESENTLY holding this PROTECTED Group of People HOSTAGE and subjecting them to GENOCIDAL practices for purposes of ADVANCING the WHITE Man’s Agenda to MAKE the WHITE Race Supreme OVER “ALL” other Races, etc.
To support the work of Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome DONATIONS may be made at:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome or
CONFIDENTIAL/ANONYMOUS DONATIONS AT:
https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With PEACE & LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi
(513) 680-2922
111617 HIND COUNTY MS NOTIFICATION (Officer Douglas Johnson)-FINALVogelDenise
This document provides notice of intent to file a lawsuit against the State of Mississippi, Hinds County Mississippi, and Hinds County Officer Douglas Johnson regarding an unlawful traffic stop and conspiracy charges. The document alleges Officer Johnson conspired to commit crimes, falsely report crimes, defraud the individual, and tamper with evidence related to a traffic ticket. The individual intends to file suit for conspiracy, false reporting, perjury, and tampering with evidence. Audio and video evidence is referenced to support the allegations.
Legal process that allows the federal government to take “ill gotten gains” from the defendant.
Inserted into numerous federal statutes and is mandatory for over 200 federal crimes.
Gross Proceeds at time of commission of the offense may be forfeitable.
Process begins immediately after sentencing.
Proceeds go to government, not victim.
The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General plays a critical role in protecting whistleblowers in DoD intelligence agencies by investigating allegations of reprisal. While early laws exempted intelligence community employees from protections, the ICWPA and IG Act now provide channels for issues of "urgent concern" to be disclosed and investigated. The DoD IG's Civilian Reprisal Investigations directorate specifically investigates cases of whistleblower reprisal in DoD intelligence agencies, including actions involving security clearances which can be tantamount to termination. Notable cases include substantiated reprisal allegations at NSA and CIFA.
This bill seeks to strengthen NATO, combat international cybercrime, and impose additional sanctions on Russia. It contains 7 titles addressing: 1) matters relating to NATO, including opposition to US withdrawal and strengthening the alliance; 2) public diplomacy at the Department of State; 3) chemical weapons nonproliferation; 4) international cybercrime prevention; 5) election interference; 6) expanding Russia sanctions in coordination with the EU; and 7) other Russia-related matters such as fusion centers and aid to Europe/Eurasia. The bill expresses the sense of Congress that the President should condemn Russian interference and support Ukraine/Georgia/Moldova against Russian aggression.
06/11/18 Cary Johnson's NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE & ORDER (GP10037737)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is a copy of the 06/11/18 Court document filed on behalf of Cary Cornelius Johnson entitled, “NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE AT JUNE 18, 2018 COURT ACTION; DEMAND FOR DISCHARGE OF BOND; DEMAND FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; and NOTICE REITERATING OF REQUEST SEEKING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL PROSECUTION.”
This filing shows and/or EXPOSES the extent of the CONSPIRACIES and the use of the United States’ DESPOT’S TAINTED Judicial System to engage in TERRORIST/RACIST Acts to COVER UP their CRIMINIAL Activities. Furthermore, shares information and EVIDENCE of FORECLOSURE Scams of Planters Bank & Trust Company and others.
Please feel free to visit the Utica International Embassy’s Website at
https://uticainternationalembassy.website
The document provides state information for Illinois' 2012-2013 block grant application including:
- The Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health will be the grantee.
- Contact information is provided for Mary Smith, who is responsible for the application submission.
- The most recent state expenditure period that is closed out is July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010.
11/13/18 Letter To USDOJ & ICC Providing Redacted Affidavit For Criminal Comp...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
The Utica International Embassy’s filing of CRIMINAL COMPLAINT/COMMUNICATION on behalf of its Government Officials/Citizens. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court is sought due to the USA’s FAILURE TO ACT upon the Criminal Complaints submitted, etc. Moreover, FAILURE TO PREVENT, etc. further War Crimes, Apartheid Practices/Crimes Against Humanity, etc. reported by Vogel Denise Newsome (now serving as the Interim Prime Minister of the “NEW” Government of the Utica International Embassy) and OTHERS…
JURISDICTION of the United States of America’s Department of Justice (“USDOJ”) is sought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Part II, 28 U.S.C. § 516, and the applicable Statutes/Laws governing said matters.
JURISDICTION of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) is sought pursuant to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the applicable Statutes/Laws governing said matters regarding this instant Communication/Criminal Complaint and the Situation(s) addressed therein.
The United States Department of Justice’s FAILURE TO ACT upon the Criminal Complaints filed REPORTING the Crimes of the United States of America’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) and others through the 09/17/04 Petition:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/ex-34-091704-petition-seekingintervention-entergymatter
affords the ICC with Jurisdiction to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE; moreover, allows for the Utica International Embassy to INCLUDE the DOMESTIC Terrorist Acts of September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged Targets because these TERRORIST Acts/Acts of TERRORISM were carried out by none other than Baker Donelson and those with whom they CONSPIRED. The 09/17/04 Petition submitted to the USDOJ WAS SUBMITTED “AFTER” the July 1, 2002, date in which the ROME STATUTE Of The International Criminal Court is reported to have been entered into force! Therefore, Legally/Lawfully affording the ICC Jurisdiction to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE these Domestic Terrorist Attacks!
The IMPORTANCE of PRESERVING evidence NO MATTER HOW LONG it takes to seek and GET JUSTICE!
§ 2339C PROHIBITIONS AGAINST THE FINANCING OF TERRORISMVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
§ 2339C PROHIBITIONS AGAINST THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM
The title speaks for itself. Nevertheless, we are posting this information as EVIDENCE of one of the Statutes/Laws under which we will be moving forward and seeking INTERNATIONAL Intervention as a result of the United States DESPOTISM Government Regime’s/Organization’s UNLAWFUL and ILLEGAL SEIZURE of the United States of America’s Government!
We look forward to Legally and Lawfully obtaining INTERNATIONAL Assistance as we move forward to BUILDING a NEW GOVERNMENT that will PROTECT the Natives and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color residing within the Lands/Territories NOW known as the United States of America FROM the NAZI and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists that have INFILTRATED and/or HIJACKED the United States of America’s Government and are PRESENTLY holding this PROTECTED Group of People HOSTAGE and subjecting them to GENOCIDAL practices for purposes of ADVANCING the WHITE Man’s Agenda to MAKE the WHITE Race Supreme OVER “ALL” other Races, etc.
To support the work of Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome DONATIONS may be made at:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome or
CONFIDENTIAL/ANONYMOUS DONATIONS AT:
https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With PEACE & LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi
(513) 680-2922
111617 HIND COUNTY MS NOTIFICATION (Officer Douglas Johnson)-FINALVogelDenise
This document provides notice of intent to file a lawsuit against the State of Mississippi, Hinds County Mississippi, and Hinds County Officer Douglas Johnson regarding an unlawful traffic stop and conspiracy charges. The document alleges Officer Johnson conspired to commit crimes, falsely report crimes, defraud the individual, and tamper with evidence related to a traffic ticket. The individual intends to file suit for conspiracy, false reporting, perjury, and tampering with evidence. Audio and video evidence is referenced to support the allegations.
Legal process that allows the federal government to take “ill gotten gains” from the defendant.
Inserted into numerous federal statutes and is mandatory for over 200 federal crimes.
Gross Proceeds at time of commission of the offense may be forfeitable.
Process begins immediately after sentencing.
Proceeds go to government, not victim.
The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General plays a critical role in protecting whistleblowers in DoD intelligence agencies by investigating allegations of reprisal. While early laws exempted intelligence community employees from protections, the ICWPA and IG Act now provide channels for issues of "urgent concern" to be disclosed and investigated. The DoD IG's Civilian Reprisal Investigations directorate specifically investigates cases of whistleblower reprisal in DoD intelligence agencies, including actions involving security clearances which can be tantamount to termination. Notable cases include substantiated reprisal allegations at NSA and CIFA.
This bill seeks to strengthen NATO, combat international cybercrime, and impose additional sanctions on Russia. It contains 7 titles addressing: 1) matters relating to NATO, including opposition to US withdrawal and strengthening the alliance; 2) public diplomacy at the Department of State; 3) chemical weapons nonproliferation; 4) international cybercrime prevention; 5) election interference; 6) expanding Russia sanctions in coordination with the EU; and 7) other Russia-related matters such as fusion centers and aid to Europe/Eurasia. The bill expresses the sense of Congress that the President should condemn Russian interference and support Ukraine/Georgia/Moldova against Russian aggression.
06/11/18 Cary Johnson's NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE & ORDER (GP10037737)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is a copy of the 06/11/18 Court document filed on behalf of Cary Cornelius Johnson entitled, “NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE AT JUNE 18, 2018 COURT ACTION; DEMAND FOR DISCHARGE OF BOND; DEMAND FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; and NOTICE REITERATING OF REQUEST SEEKING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL PROSECUTION.”
This filing shows and/or EXPOSES the extent of the CONSPIRACIES and the use of the United States’ DESPOT’S TAINTED Judicial System to engage in TERRORIST/RACIST Acts to COVER UP their CRIMINIAL Activities. Furthermore, shares information and EVIDENCE of FORECLOSURE Scams of Planters Bank & Trust Company and others.
Please feel free to visit the Utica International Embassy’s Website at
https://uticainternationalembassy.website
The document provides state information for Illinois' 2012-2013 block grant application including:
- The Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health will be the grantee.
- Contact information is provided for Mary Smith, who is responsible for the application submission.
- The most recent state expenditure period that is closed out is July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010.
The document summarizes the House and Senate schedules and legislative activities for the week of April 15, 2013. The House will consider several bills under suspension of the rules related to government oversight and accountability. The Senate will discuss immigration reform and hold hearings on the issue. Both chambers will hold hearings on the FY2014 budgets for various federal agencies as they begin the appropriations process.
This executive order makes several changes to immigration and refugee policy. It suspends the US refugee program for 120 days to review screening procedures. It also suspends entry of Syrian refugees indefinitely and caps annual refugee admissions at 50,000. It directs several agencies to enhance vetting of immigration applications and implement more uniform screening standards. It also calls for collection and reporting of data on foreign nationals involved in terrorism in the US.
Republic act no. 9851 official gazette of the republic of the philippinesgemrodflorano
This document is the Republic Act No. 9851, which was signed into law in the Philippines on December 11, 2009. It defines terms related to international humanitarian law, genocide, and other crimes against humanity. It also establishes the jurisdiction of Philippine courts over such crimes and designates special courts to try cases involving these crimes. The Act affirms the Philippines' commitment to international law and human rights, and its rejection of war as an instrument of national policy. It aims to prevent impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes.
This document provides information about Senator Jennifer Fielder and Senate Joint Resolution 15 (SJ-15), which conducted a legislative study of federal land management in Montana. Some key points:
- Senator Fielder is from Montana and chairs SJ-15, which had strong bipartisan support.
- SJ-15 found that federal lands make up over 27 million acres in Montana and that federal funding and management of these lands is inadequate, jeopardizing environmental, economic, and social factors.
- A county survey conducted for SJ-15 showed widespread concerns about issues like wildfires, access restrictions, and payments to counties being too low to make up for non-taxable federal lands.
The memorandum recommends that the City Council support and approve the Texas Opioid Abatement Fund Council and Settlement Allocation Term Sheet. This would provide the City of Alamo Heights with an initial $28,198 from the opioid settlement funds. The term sheet establishes a Texas Opioid Council to oversee allocation of settlement funds for approved opioid abatement purposes according to guidelines in the settlement agreement. Staff recommends the Council authorize acceptance of the term sheet and adopt its allocation method for opioid settlement proceeds.
This document discusses Wisconsin municipal OWI law and jurisdiction over OWI offenses. It provides an overview of municipal court jurisdiction over first offense OWIs as civil forfeitures. It also discusses limitations on municipal court jurisdiction if a valid prior conviction exists. The document outlines circuit court jurisdiction over first offense OWIs and contradictory appellate court opinions on jurisdiction if a prior conviction exists. It defines key terms related to OWI offenses like "operate," "motor vehicle," "highway," and premises held out for public use. It also discusses what constitutes being "under the influence" and prohibited alcohol concentrations.
This joint resolution of the Utah Legislature urges Congress to fully and permanently fund PILT (Payments in Lieu of Taxes) at the assessed value of similar lands, as it does not currently compensate Utah adequately for federally controlled public lands. Alternatively, it demands that Congress transfer ownership of public lands to Utah, as it did for other states, so Utah can generate tax revenue from the lands. It argues that Congress has not upheld its obligation from Utah's statehood to transfer public land ownership, depriving Utah of sovereignty and revenue for education, services, and development.
ELEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMES AND MODES OF LIABILITYTakeh Sendze
This document discusses elements of international crimes and modes of liability that are relevant for prosecuting cases transferred from the ICTR to Rwanda. It defines the seven crimes within the ICTR's jurisdiction - genocide, conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide, attempt to commit genocide, complicity in genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. It then outlines how six of these crimes map to crimes under Rwandan law. The document also defines the elements of these six crimes and discusses three modes of liability - committing, aiding and abetting, and superior responsibility.
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking actKeri Strahler
This document is a bill introduced in the US House of Representatives to amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to better enable state child welfare agencies to prevent human trafficking of children and serve the needs of children who are victims of human trafficking.
The bill proposes developing best practice guidelines for state agencies to identify and serve victims of human trafficking. It also calls for streamlining data collection requirements to help identify victims of trafficking within state child welfare systems. Additionally, the bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to report to Congress on the prevalence of human trafficking among children within state welfare systems and the practices used to identify and serve victims.
HospitalityLawyer.com | Linda K. Enghagen Lawsuit Study | Compliance With Sam...HospitalityLawyer.com
1) Three lawsuits were brought against hospitality businesses under state public accommodation laws prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination. One involved a same-sex couple denied wedding reception space, one involved a same-sex couple denied a hotel room, and one involved a woman denied service at a restaurant with friends.
2) State public accommodation laws provide broader protections than federal law, prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation as well. Compliance with these laws is important for hospitality businesses.
3) Recognizing same-sex relationships generates economic opportunities for the hospitality industry through wedding and event business, though some oppose this for religious reasons.
The document is a quiz for a law course that covers topics related to jurisdiction and the essential elements of crimes. It includes multiple choice, true/false, and completion questions about key concepts such as: the division of powers between federal and state governments; the authority of tribal, military, and international courts; the requirement of an actus reus and mens rea for crimes; different levels of mental state (e.g. purposeful, knowing, reckless); and defenses like mistake of age.
The General Assembly's 2015 legislative session ended on March 25 after approving comprehensive anti-heroin legislation and expanding protective orders to include dating violence victims. Key bills passed include increased penalties for heroin dealers, expanding addiction treatment programs, and allowing local needle exchange programs. The legislature also approved bills on child abuse, medical research funding, and responding to unusually high numbers of snow days in schools.
1) A task force is created to study the financial impacts to Wyoming from federally owned lands, including lost property tax revenue, permitting delays, and land management as wilderness or under other federal acts.
2) The attorney general is required to report on possible legal approaches for the state to compel the federal government to transfer ownership of federal lands to Wyoming.
3) The task force must submit recommendations and proposed legislation to a legislative interim committee by November 2013.
122018-USDOJ & ICC (Mississippi Under Terrorist Attacks)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
URGENT NOTIFICATION: THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY ARE PRESENTLY UNDER TERRORIST ATTACKS!
As of 12/20/18, this document may also be viewed at the following LINKS:
FilesAnywhere: https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c69678d5f647178b0
UIE Website: http://uticainternationalembassy.website/index.php/pages/12-20-18-state-of-ms-uie-under-terrorist-attacks
The United States of America and its Confederate States of America have LAUNCHED “ALL OUT” Terrorist Attacks and have sent their Nazis and/or Confederates, Ku Klux Klan and WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists out on the Interstates/Highways/Roads/Streets, etc. DISGUISED in Law Enforcement Uniforms to TERRORIZE, THREATEN, HARRASS, INTIMIDATE, KIDNAP, KILL/MURDER, etc. specifically TARGETING Natives, Native Americans and those who have been LABELED as Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color – i.e. with MAJOR focus on TARGETING the Utica International Embassy’s Government Officials and Citizens/Supporters of this Legally/Lawfully formed “NEW” Government!
PLEASE BE ADVISED that such UNLAWFUL Roadblocks are PROHIBITED under the United States of America’s FEDERAL Laws and that the STATES (as Mississippi) are under the JURISDICTION of the USA. In 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States of America (In USA vs. Herbert Guest) found such ROADBLOCKS to be in VIOLATION of Sovereign Citizens’ Rights and Privileges, etc. The Harold Guest Lawsuit being brought by the USA! A copy of the Supreme Court’s Decision may be found at the following LINK:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-vs-herbert-guest-highlighted
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
This document outlines Act 34 of 2007, called the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, which aims to prevent certain anti-social activities in the state of Kerala. Some key points:
- It defines various types of "anti-social activities" and labels people involved in these activities as "goondas" or "known rowdies". This includes activities like bootlegging, counterfeiting, environmental damage, and more.
- It gives the government and authorized officers the power to issue detention orders for known goondas and rowdies if they are satisfied it is necessary to prevent further anti-social activities. Detention orders can be up to 12 days.
- The act
The document summarizes the key provisions of the Project BioShield Act of 2004 signed into law by President Bush. It authorizes $5.6 billion over 10 years to purchase treatments for bioterror agents. It gives new authorities to expedite research and development of medical countermeasures. It allows emergency use of treatments that lack FDA approval in a crisis.
This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding an executive order issued by President Trump imposing restrictions on entry into the US from several majority-Muslim countries. The court found that while the President has broad authority to control immigration, his actions in issuing the executive order exceeded the scope of authority delegated by Congress. Specifically, the President did not make a sufficient finding that entry of these classes of people would harm national interests, as required by law. The court also found the order violated other provisions of immigration law prohibiting nationality-based discrimination and requiring certain processes for refugee caps. The court affirmed the lower court's preliminary injunction of sections of the executive order on these statutory grounds.
This bill modifies provisions related to the jurisdiction of political subdivisions over federally managed land located within or adjacent to the political subdivision. It defines key terms and authorizes the chief executive officer of a political subdivision or county sheriff to exercise jurisdiction over a national monument or recreation area that is wholly or partially located within the political subdivision. It also outlines steps the attorney general must take if legal action is filed against the chief executive officer, sheriff, or their employees regarding actions taken to address threats to public health, safety or welfare from federal land management.
Haiti Criminal Collusion transparency act 2023.pdfRezoNdws
This bill would require the Secretary of State to submit an annual report to Congress on ties between criminal gangs and political/economic elites in Haiti. The report would identify criminal gangs and their activities, list elites with gang ties, and describe how elites use gangs to advance political/economic interests. It would also require the President to impose sanctions on elites identified in the report as having criminal ties, unless a waiver is issued for national security or humanitarian reasons. The goal is to address collusion between elites and gangs that threatens Haitian security and U.S. interests.
Violent Crimes Report for Continental U.S. (1980 - 2009)Afroxl87
The document discusses violent crime rates in the continental United States from 1980 to 2009 based on FBI Uniform Crime Reporting data. It finds that violent crime peaked in the early 1990s, with 1992 having the most reports of violent crime for the decade. The passage of the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which provided billions for law enforcement and crime prevention, corresponded with declining violent crime rates throughout the remainder of the 1990s. Rates fluctuated by state and decade, influenced by factors like the introduction of crack cocaine in the 1980s and economic conditions. Overall, reports of violent crime increased dramatically from the 1960s through the early 1990s before declining for the rest of the analyzed period.
The document summarizes the House and Senate schedules and legislative activities for the week of April 15, 2013. The House will consider several bills under suspension of the rules related to government oversight and accountability. The Senate will discuss immigration reform and hold hearings on the issue. Both chambers will hold hearings on the FY2014 budgets for various federal agencies as they begin the appropriations process.
This executive order makes several changes to immigration and refugee policy. It suspends the US refugee program for 120 days to review screening procedures. It also suspends entry of Syrian refugees indefinitely and caps annual refugee admissions at 50,000. It directs several agencies to enhance vetting of immigration applications and implement more uniform screening standards. It also calls for collection and reporting of data on foreign nationals involved in terrorism in the US.
Republic act no. 9851 official gazette of the republic of the philippinesgemrodflorano
This document is the Republic Act No. 9851, which was signed into law in the Philippines on December 11, 2009. It defines terms related to international humanitarian law, genocide, and other crimes against humanity. It also establishes the jurisdiction of Philippine courts over such crimes and designates special courts to try cases involving these crimes. The Act affirms the Philippines' commitment to international law and human rights, and its rejection of war as an instrument of national policy. It aims to prevent impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes.
This document provides information about Senator Jennifer Fielder and Senate Joint Resolution 15 (SJ-15), which conducted a legislative study of federal land management in Montana. Some key points:
- Senator Fielder is from Montana and chairs SJ-15, which had strong bipartisan support.
- SJ-15 found that federal lands make up over 27 million acres in Montana and that federal funding and management of these lands is inadequate, jeopardizing environmental, economic, and social factors.
- A county survey conducted for SJ-15 showed widespread concerns about issues like wildfires, access restrictions, and payments to counties being too low to make up for non-taxable federal lands.
The memorandum recommends that the City Council support and approve the Texas Opioid Abatement Fund Council and Settlement Allocation Term Sheet. This would provide the City of Alamo Heights with an initial $28,198 from the opioid settlement funds. The term sheet establishes a Texas Opioid Council to oversee allocation of settlement funds for approved opioid abatement purposes according to guidelines in the settlement agreement. Staff recommends the Council authorize acceptance of the term sheet and adopt its allocation method for opioid settlement proceeds.
This document discusses Wisconsin municipal OWI law and jurisdiction over OWI offenses. It provides an overview of municipal court jurisdiction over first offense OWIs as civil forfeitures. It also discusses limitations on municipal court jurisdiction if a valid prior conviction exists. The document outlines circuit court jurisdiction over first offense OWIs and contradictory appellate court opinions on jurisdiction if a prior conviction exists. It defines key terms related to OWI offenses like "operate," "motor vehicle," "highway," and premises held out for public use. It also discusses what constitutes being "under the influence" and prohibited alcohol concentrations.
This joint resolution of the Utah Legislature urges Congress to fully and permanently fund PILT (Payments in Lieu of Taxes) at the assessed value of similar lands, as it does not currently compensate Utah adequately for federally controlled public lands. Alternatively, it demands that Congress transfer ownership of public lands to Utah, as it did for other states, so Utah can generate tax revenue from the lands. It argues that Congress has not upheld its obligation from Utah's statehood to transfer public land ownership, depriving Utah of sovereignty and revenue for education, services, and development.
ELEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMES AND MODES OF LIABILITYTakeh Sendze
This document discusses elements of international crimes and modes of liability that are relevant for prosecuting cases transferred from the ICTR to Rwanda. It defines the seven crimes within the ICTR's jurisdiction - genocide, conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide, attempt to commit genocide, complicity in genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. It then outlines how six of these crimes map to crimes under Rwandan law. The document also defines the elements of these six crimes and discusses three modes of liability - committing, aiding and abetting, and superior responsibility.
The strengthening the child welfare response to trafficking actKeri Strahler
This document is a bill introduced in the US House of Representatives to amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to better enable state child welfare agencies to prevent human trafficking of children and serve the needs of children who are victims of human trafficking.
The bill proposes developing best practice guidelines for state agencies to identify and serve victims of human trafficking. It also calls for streamlining data collection requirements to help identify victims of trafficking within state child welfare systems. Additionally, the bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to report to Congress on the prevalence of human trafficking among children within state welfare systems and the practices used to identify and serve victims.
HospitalityLawyer.com | Linda K. Enghagen Lawsuit Study | Compliance With Sam...HospitalityLawyer.com
1) Three lawsuits were brought against hospitality businesses under state public accommodation laws prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination. One involved a same-sex couple denied wedding reception space, one involved a same-sex couple denied a hotel room, and one involved a woman denied service at a restaurant with friends.
2) State public accommodation laws provide broader protections than federal law, prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation as well. Compliance with these laws is important for hospitality businesses.
3) Recognizing same-sex relationships generates economic opportunities for the hospitality industry through wedding and event business, though some oppose this for religious reasons.
The document is a quiz for a law course that covers topics related to jurisdiction and the essential elements of crimes. It includes multiple choice, true/false, and completion questions about key concepts such as: the division of powers between federal and state governments; the authority of tribal, military, and international courts; the requirement of an actus reus and mens rea for crimes; different levels of mental state (e.g. purposeful, knowing, reckless); and defenses like mistake of age.
The General Assembly's 2015 legislative session ended on March 25 after approving comprehensive anti-heroin legislation and expanding protective orders to include dating violence victims. Key bills passed include increased penalties for heroin dealers, expanding addiction treatment programs, and allowing local needle exchange programs. The legislature also approved bills on child abuse, medical research funding, and responding to unusually high numbers of snow days in schools.
1) A task force is created to study the financial impacts to Wyoming from federally owned lands, including lost property tax revenue, permitting delays, and land management as wilderness or under other federal acts.
2) The attorney general is required to report on possible legal approaches for the state to compel the federal government to transfer ownership of federal lands to Wyoming.
3) The task force must submit recommendations and proposed legislation to a legislative interim committee by November 2013.
122018-USDOJ & ICC (Mississippi Under Terrorist Attacks)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
URGENT NOTIFICATION: THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY ARE PRESENTLY UNDER TERRORIST ATTACKS!
As of 12/20/18, this document may also be viewed at the following LINKS:
FilesAnywhere: https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c69678d5f647178b0
UIE Website: http://uticainternationalembassy.website/index.php/pages/12-20-18-state-of-ms-uie-under-terrorist-attacks
The United States of America and its Confederate States of America have LAUNCHED “ALL OUT” Terrorist Attacks and have sent their Nazis and/or Confederates, Ku Klux Klan and WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists out on the Interstates/Highways/Roads/Streets, etc. DISGUISED in Law Enforcement Uniforms to TERRORIZE, THREATEN, HARRASS, INTIMIDATE, KIDNAP, KILL/MURDER, etc. specifically TARGETING Natives, Native Americans and those who have been LABELED as Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color – i.e. with MAJOR focus on TARGETING the Utica International Embassy’s Government Officials and Citizens/Supporters of this Legally/Lawfully formed “NEW” Government!
PLEASE BE ADVISED that such UNLAWFUL Roadblocks are PROHIBITED under the United States of America’s FEDERAL Laws and that the STATES (as Mississippi) are under the JURISDICTION of the USA. In 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States of America (In USA vs. Herbert Guest) found such ROADBLOCKS to be in VIOLATION of Sovereign Citizens’ Rights and Privileges, etc. The Harold Guest Lawsuit being brought by the USA! A copy of the Supreme Court’s Decision may be found at the following LINK:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-vs-herbert-guest-highlighted
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
This document outlines Act 34 of 2007, called the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, which aims to prevent certain anti-social activities in the state of Kerala. Some key points:
- It defines various types of "anti-social activities" and labels people involved in these activities as "goondas" or "known rowdies". This includes activities like bootlegging, counterfeiting, environmental damage, and more.
- It gives the government and authorized officers the power to issue detention orders for known goondas and rowdies if they are satisfied it is necessary to prevent further anti-social activities. Detention orders can be up to 12 days.
- The act
The document summarizes the key provisions of the Project BioShield Act of 2004 signed into law by President Bush. It authorizes $5.6 billion over 10 years to purchase treatments for bioterror agents. It gives new authorities to expedite research and development of medical countermeasures. It allows emergency use of treatments that lack FDA approval in a crisis.
This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding an executive order issued by President Trump imposing restrictions on entry into the US from several majority-Muslim countries. The court found that while the President has broad authority to control immigration, his actions in issuing the executive order exceeded the scope of authority delegated by Congress. Specifically, the President did not make a sufficient finding that entry of these classes of people would harm national interests, as required by law. The court also found the order violated other provisions of immigration law prohibiting nationality-based discrimination and requiring certain processes for refugee caps. The court affirmed the lower court's preliminary injunction of sections of the executive order on these statutory grounds.
This bill modifies provisions related to the jurisdiction of political subdivisions over federally managed land located within or adjacent to the political subdivision. It defines key terms and authorizes the chief executive officer of a political subdivision or county sheriff to exercise jurisdiction over a national monument or recreation area that is wholly or partially located within the political subdivision. It also outlines steps the attorney general must take if legal action is filed against the chief executive officer, sheriff, or their employees regarding actions taken to address threats to public health, safety or welfare from federal land management.
Haiti Criminal Collusion transparency act 2023.pdfRezoNdws
This bill would require the Secretary of State to submit an annual report to Congress on ties between criminal gangs and political/economic elites in Haiti. The report would identify criminal gangs and their activities, list elites with gang ties, and describe how elites use gangs to advance political/economic interests. It would also require the President to impose sanctions on elites identified in the report as having criminal ties, unless a waiver is issued for national security or humanitarian reasons. The goal is to address collusion between elites and gangs that threatens Haitian security and U.S. interests.
Violent Crimes Report for Continental U.S. (1980 - 2009)Afroxl87
The document discusses violent crime rates in the continental United States from 1980 to 2009 based on FBI Uniform Crime Reporting data. It finds that violent crime peaked in the early 1990s, with 1992 having the most reports of violent crime for the decade. The passage of the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which provided billions for law enforcement and crime prevention, corresponded with declining violent crime rates throughout the remainder of the 1990s. Rates fluctuated by state and decade, influenced by factors like the introduction of crack cocaine in the 1980s and economic conditions. Overall, reports of violent crime increased dramatically from the 1960s through the early 1990s before declining for the rest of the analyzed period.
This document provides a summary of terrorism issues in Latin America according to a 2010 Congressional Research Service report. It discusses terrorist groups and states of concern, including the FARC and ELN in Colombia, remnants of Shining Path in Peru, Cuba's designation as a state sponsor of terrorism, and concerns about Venezuela and the tri-border area of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay. It also outlines recent U.S. legislation related to terrorism in the region and increased regional counterterrorism cooperation since 9/11.
Cyber Espionage The Silent Crime of Cyberspace Virginia GOllieShoresna
Cyber Espionage: The Silent Crime of Cyberspace
Virginia Greiman
Boston University, Boston, USA
[email protected]
Abstract: In recent years, the disclosure of secrets through cyber infiltration of America’s largest intelligence organization,
the National Security Agency (NSA), has raised the fears of veteran intelligence officials and close allies around the globe that
no institution or government is secure from those who roam the discrete halls of cyberspace. Although espionage has existed
since before the days of the Greek mythological Trojan horse, no one could have envisioned the sophisticated use of
espionage in today’s networked world. Espionage has been used for political and military intelligence and economic and
industrial pursuits with a lack of understanding of all of the impacts on our daily lives. In the context of foreign or international
law, espionage is sometimes characterized as lawless, without controls or regulation, and it rarely distinguishes between
economic and security based cyber espionage. Through empirical analysis this paper explores the treatment of espionage
under various legal systems including those countries and regions considered the most advanced at cyber espionage, the
United States, the United Kingdom, Russia and China. To provide greater insight into the different perspectives of cyber
espionage from a legal standpoint, this paper distinguishes the law of national intelligence collection from the criminal laws
of economic/industrial espionage on the domestic front. The purpose of this research is to analyze the development of cyber
espionage as a preferred means of contemporary warfare, as well as a tool for economic and political intelligence. The paper
concludes by responding to the challenges faced by nation-states in the development of an effective legal system governing
espionage at the domestic and international level.
Keywords: cyber espionage, cybercrime, foreign surveillance, national intelligence, economic espionage, cyber warfare
1. Introduction
Although many countries all over the world are committing cyber espionage, the United States, Russia, and China
represent the most sophisticated cyber spying capabilities (Senate, 2014). A 2011 Report by the Office of the
National Counterintelligence Executive (ONCIX) suggested that the rise of cyberspace as a platform for
innovation and storage of trade secrets was greatly enhancing the risks faced by American firms. The report also
found that the United States remains the prime target for foreign economic collection and industrial espionage
by virtue of its global technological leadership and innovation (ONCIX, 2011).
Cyber espionage has also become an accepted and even preferred means of warfare. That is not to say that
cyber espionage will replace traditional means of warfare, but it is already affecting the nature of nation-state
conflict. Dunn Cavelty (2012) suggests that this shift began with the Cold War ...
Juan J Malfavon pursuing criminal justice outlinejuansclass
This document outlines Juan Malfavon's pursuit of knowledge in the criminal justice system, specifically policing. It discusses the investigation process, detention of criminals, and formal arrest procedures as key practices in policing. It also examines challenges like developing multicultural training programs and establishing nationwide law enforcement standards. The document advocates for information sharing between agencies and argues that legal changes like the Patriot Act are necessary responses to increasing terrorism.
The document provides a summary of events and activities from the U.S. Department of Justice for the month of June 2008. Key highlights include:
- Attorney General Mukasey visited Asia and met with officials in Indonesia, Thailand, and Japan to discuss bilateral law enforcement cooperation.
- Congress passed the Protect America Act to restore authority for intelligence collection and provide liability protection for telecom companies.
- The Department of Justice emphasized efforts to combat healthcare fraud through nationwide enforcement and prosecution of fraud schemes.
- Over 400 defendants were charged in connection with mortgage fraud schemes through Operation Malicious Mortgage, with estimated losses of $1 billion.
This document examines international efforts to combat terrorism in light of the 9/11 attacks. It discusses how defining terrorism has been challenging due to conflicting political interests and legal jurisdictions. While international agreements have described certain terrorist acts, there is still no consensus on a definition. The document also summarizes two case studies on the societal impacts of terrorism in the Philippines and Colombia, finding that terrorism can increase violence, restrict travel, and flourish more in urban areas with weaker social controls.
Using Apache Spark and Differential Privacy for Protecting the Privacy of the...Databricks
The document discusses using differential privacy to protect the privacy of respondents in the 2020 US Census. It describes how the Census Bureau is using Spark and differential privacy to perform roughly 2 million optimizations to balance data accuracy and privacy. Challenges include developing monitoring systems in Amazon's GovCloud to oversee multiple computing clusters running thousands of applications testing differential privacy techniques. The goal is to improve on privacy protections used in 2010 by quantifying and limiting re-identification risk from the published census data.
This document provides an update to a 1993 report on the role of information and communications technologies in hate crimes. It discusses hate crime laws and data in the U.S., examines how modern technologies like social media, bots, and video games may be used to advocate for hate crimes, and considers related First Amendment issues. While some criminal groups use online media, the document finds no evidence that electronic communications cause hate crimes or that hate criminals use online media more than other criminals. It recommends continued monitoring of speech that solicits, conspires or aids hate crimes, along with reform of Section 230 internet liability protections.
Final presentation rev 1 - USA Patriot Actgbsmith5
The USA PATRIOT Act was passed 45 days after 9/11 to enhance domestic security and increase surveillance powers. It impacted laws around intelligence gathering, immigration, and more. While proponents argued it granted needed powers to fight terrorism, critics said it infringed on civil liberties. There have been ongoing legal challenges around its scope and application. As time has passed, there are calls to reevaluate the act and ensure powers are not abused.
1) The document discusses state and local law enforcement's role in enforcing immigration laws. It notes that while the federal government is responsible for immigration enforcement, they lack the resources to do so effectively.
2) It examines how some state and local law enforcement agencies have taken on immigration enforcement duties through programs like 287(g). This allows them to identify and detain undocumented immigrants.
3) However, taking on immigration enforcement can be problematic as it diverts resources away from other law enforcement responsibilities and may damage relationships with immigrant communities. Effective policies and oversight are needed.
ECON 202 Written AssignmentDue April 28th Submitted through BlacEvonCanales257
ECON 202 Written Assignment
Due April 28th Submitted through Blackboard
Topic: You can choose a business or industry that has been impacted by COVID 19. I want you to write a 2 page paper on how you think the pandemic has effected the business and the impact on society. I want you to relate the topic to the economic effects on the society. This will require you to use the terms we have learned and relate the economic principles we have studied in class.
When I say 2 pages I MEAN content of 2 pages. Do not put your name, class section, or any other info at the top or bottom of the page. I will know who it is when you submit it in blackboard, but, if you want to put that information on your paper, Do A Title Page! Use double spacing and a font of 14 for your paper.
The rubric is:
Economic termsuse a minimum of 15 @ 2points each 30 points
Length of paper minimum of 2 pages, 5 paragraphs 10 points
Content of paper is your paper logical, did you present an
Economic position, is it relevant to society? 10 points
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
The Cyber Domain
Metcalf, Andy, USMC;Scott, Dan
Marine Corps Gazette; Aug 2015; 99, 8; ProQuest
pg. 57
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Cyber Espionage: The Silent Crime of Cyberspace
Virginia Greiman
Boston University, Boston, USA
[email protected]
Abstract: In recent years, the disclosure of secrets through cyber infiltration of America’s largest intelligence organization,
the National Security Agency (NSA), has raised the fears of veteran intelligence officials and close allies around the globe that
no institution or government is secure from those who roam the discrete halls of cyberspace. Although espionage has existed
since before the days of the Greek mythological Trojan horse, no one could have envisioned the sophisticated use of
espionage in today’s networked world. Espionage has been used for political and military intelligence and economic and
industrial pursuits with a lack of understanding of all of the impacts on our daily lives. In the context of foreign or international
law, espionage is sometimes characterized as lawless, without controls or regulation, and it rarely distinguishes between
economic and security based cyber espionage. Through empirical analysis this paper explores the treatment of espionage
under various legal systems including those countries and regions considered the most advanced at cyber espionage, the
United States, the United Kingdom, Russia and China. To provide greater insight into the different perspectives of cyber
espionage from a legal standpoint, this paper distinguishes the law of national intelligence collection from the cr ...
The document discusses the USA Patriot Act, which was passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It aimed to strengthen security by expanding surveillance and counterterrorism powers. While this increased security capabilities, it also reduced privacy protections and gave the government broad authority. The document examines both sides of the debate, noting the Patriot Act enhanced national security but also potentially violated civil liberties through vague language and unconstitutional surveillance practices.
The document discusses the changes to national security and surveillance laws and practices in the U.S. following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It outlines the expansion of government surveillance powers through laws like the Patriot Act and Protect America Act, as well as increased collection and sharing of citizen data among government agencies. While these changes aimed to increase security, they also infringed on civil liberties. The document debates how to balance these security and liberty concerns.
The document discusses the response of law enforcement to the 9/11 terrorist attacks over the past 10 years. It outlines key initiatives like the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan and Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative that were established to improve information sharing between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. The Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council was also formed to advocate for state and local law enforcement needs and provide guidance on bolstering intelligence analysis and sharing capabilities.
Cassandra Ferraro518pmAug 17 at 518pmManage Discussion EntryMaximaSheffield592
Cassandra Ferraro
5:18pmAug 17 at 5:18pm
Manage Discussion Entry
Money laundering is an illicit criminal activity that threatens the United States on both a national and transnational level. First addressed in the UN Vienna 1988 Convention, money laundering is described as “the conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is derived from any offense(s), for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or of assisting any person who is involved in such offense(s) to evade the legal consequences of his actions” (United Nations, 2021). There are three stages of money laundering. The first, placement, is the removal of money from the illicit crime. The second, layering, is disguising the money trail. The third, integration, happens when the money is made available to the launders in what appears to be from a legitimate source. While there are many money laundering possibilities, money laundering is especially a threat to the United States because often times, money laundering finances terrorism. Terrorist financing is the means that terrorist organizations financially support their efforts to pose a threat to national and international security (United Nations, 2021).
Due to developments in technology, money launders that used to be operate through cash and checks, can now conduct their business through other financial means, to include bitcoin and other electronic currencies (Department of State, 2021). In 2020, the United Nations stated that approximately $1.6 trillion are laundered every year, which is 2.7% of the global GDP (United Nations, 2020). Unfortunately, experts believe that that number will be higher in 2021 due to many criminals taking advantage of the pandemic. Dr. Mayaki stated that the government’s increased control over healthcare and social protection has led to relaxed measures regarding illegal operations and money laundering (United Nations, 2020). However, relaxing our standards, even in this time of need, further victimizes American people.
Money laundering can transcend over many different local, state, and international jurisdictions, all which leaves the United State’s borders vulnerable. In August of 2021, for example, a Chinese national and several naturalized US citizens were arrested and pled guilty to laundering $30 million in drug money in collaboration with international drug-trafficking organizations (DOJ, 2021). The American citizens involved in this investigation worked closely with citizens of Hong Kong to move profits from their cocaine operation through the global financial system. Not only were the defendants smuggling drug money and disguising it as legal profit, but they also worked with who they thought was a corrupt US Department of State Official to obtain illegally made passports (DOJ, 2021). This investigation, while fruitful, was a result of a collaboration against many different government agencies. Like many othe ...
This power point goes a little more in depth then the paper. As well as covers more area.
The paper is what I did for you your class.
this power point is one I did for Physiology 101.
The 9/11 Commission Report was the official report of the events leading up to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It was prepared by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and released in 2004. The report found that intelligence failures enabled the attacks and that neither the Clinton or Bush administrations were adequately prepared. It provided numerous recommendations but was criticized for not fully investigating warnings and holding officials accountable.
The President holds power over policy processes, priorities, and persuasion. The document discusses the Patriot Act and how it authorized information sharing between law enforcement and intelligence agencies to help connect dots and disrupt terrorist threats while protecting civil liberties. It also discusses some of the key domestic and foreign policy areas a President would focus on like the economy, healthcare, national security, and relationships with other countries. The media, especially cable news networks and online content, has become very powerful and influential in shaping public opinion and the success of politicians.
The document appears to be a sealed court filing containing over 40 pages of text. As the document is sealed, it does not provide enough accessible context or information to generate an informative summary.
Navy Constellation Class Frigate Program Background & IssuesBreakerODay
The Navy wants to procure a total of 20 new Constellation-class frigates to replace its retired Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates. The first two FFG-62s were funded in FY2020 and FY2021 at costs of $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion respectively. The FY2022 budget requests $1.1 billion for the third FFG-62. Key issues for Congress include whether the Navy's estimated costs are accurate, the impact of COVID-19, and ensuring the capabilities and number of vertical launch system tubes meet requirements.
Honolulu's Mayor Rick Blangiardi released this 35-page document stating the conditions for re-opening of businesses, offices, and personal guidelines of "Tier 5" in Honolulu.
San Diego PD Policy On Interaction With LGBTQBreakerODay
The document outlines procedures for the San Diego Police Department to interact respectfully and appropriately with transgender and gender non-binary individuals. It establishes guidelines for addressing transgender individuals by their preferred name and pronouns, making inquiries about an individual's gender identity or anatomy, conducting searches and pat downs, transporting and booking arrestees, and other interactions. The procedures are intended to create mutual understanding and prevent conflict.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdfSunsetWestLegalGroup
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
1. 135 STAT. 265
PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
Public Law 117–13
117th Congress
An Act
To facilitate the expedited review of COVID–19 hate crimes, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Hate Crimes Act’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Following the spread of COVID–19 in 2020, there has
been a dramatic increase in hate crimes and violence against
Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders.
(2) According to a recent report, there were nearly 3,800
reported cases of anti-Asian discrimination and incidents
related to COVID–19 between March 19, 2020, and February
28, 2021, in all 50 States and the District of Columbia.
(3) During this time frame, race has been cited as the
primary reason for discrimination, making up over 90 percent
of incidents, and the United States condemns and denounces
any and all anti-Asian and Pacific Islander sentiment in any
form.
(4) Roughly 36 percent of these incidents took place at
a business and more than 2,000,000 Asian-American businesses
have contributed to the diverse fabric of American life.
(5) More than 1,900,000 Asian-American and Pacific
Islander older adults, particularly those older adults who are
recent immigrants or have limited English proficiency, may
face even greater challenges in dealing with the COVID–19
pandemic, including discrimination, economic insecurity, and
language isolation.
(6) In the midst of this alarming surge in anti-Asian hate
crimes and incidents, a shooter murdered the following 8 people
in the Atlanta, Georgia region, 7 of whom were women and
6 of whom were women of Asian descent:
(A) Xiaojie Tan.
(B) Daoyou Feng.
(C) Delaina Ashley Yaun González.
(D) Paul Andre Michels.
(E) Soon Chung Park.
(F) Hyun Jung Grant.
(G) Suncha Kim.
(H) Yong Ae Yue.
(7) The people of the United States will always remember
the victims of these shootings and stand in solidarity with
Xiaojie Tan.
Daoyou Feng.
Delaina Ashley
Yaun González.
Paul Andre
Michels.
Soon Chung
Park.
Hyun Jung
Grant.
Suncha Kim.
Yong Ae Yue.
34 USC 30501
note.
34 USC 10101
note.
COVID–19 Hate
Crimes Act.
May 20, 2021
[S. 937]
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00001 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS
2. 135 STAT. 266 PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
those affected by this senseless tragedy and incidents of hate
that have affected the Asian and Pacific Islander communities.
SEC. 3. REVIEW OF HATE CRIMES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 7 days after the date of enact-
ment of this Act, the Attorney General shall designate an officer
or employee of the Department of Justice whose responsibility
during the applicable period shall be to facilitate the expedited
review of hate crimes (as described in section 249 of title 18,
United States Code) and reports of any such crime to Federal,
State, local, or Tribal law enforcement agencies.
(b) APPLICABLE PERIOD DEFINED.—In this section, the term
‘‘applicable period’’ means the period beginning on the date on
which the officer or employee is designated under subsection (a),
and ending on the date that is 1 year after the date on which
the emergency period described in subparagraph (B) of section
1135(g)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)) ends,
except that the Attorney General may extend such period as appro-
priate.
SEC. 4. GUIDANCE.
(a) GUIDANCE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.—The
Attorney General shall issue guidance for State, local, and Tribal
law enforcement agencies, pursuant to this Act and other applicable
law, on how to—
(1) establish online reporting of hate crimes or incidents,
and to have online reporting that is equally effective for people
with disabilities as for people without disabilities available
in multiple languages as determined by the Attorney General;
(2) collect data disaggregated by the protected characteris-
tics described in section 249 of title 18, United States Code;
and
(3) expand public education campaigns aimed at raising
awareness of hate crimes and reaching victims, that are equally
effective for people with disabilities as for people without
disabilities.
(b) GUIDANCE RELATING TO COVID–19 PANDEMIC.—The
Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services,
in coordination with the COVID–19 Health Equity Task Force and
community-based organizations, shall issue guidance aimed at
raising awareness of hate crimes during the COVID–19 pandemic.
SEC. 5. JABARA-HEYER NO HATE ACT.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the ‘‘Khalid
Jabara and Heather Heyer National Opposition to Hate, Assault,
and Threats to Equality Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘Jabara-Heyer NO
HATE Act’’.
(b) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The incidence of violence known as hate crimes, or
crimes motivated by bias, poses a serious national problem.
(2) According to data obtained by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the incidence of such violence increased in 2019,
the most recent year for which data is available.
(3) In 1990, Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics
Act (Public Law 101–275; 28 U.S.C. 534 note) to provide the
Federal Government, law enforcement agencies, and the public
with data regarding the incidence of hate crime. The Hate
Crime Statistics Act and the Matthew Shepard and James
Khalid Jabara
and Heather
Heyer National
Opposition to
Hate, Assault,
and Threats to
Equality Act
of 2021.
34 USC 30507.
Coordination.
34 USC 30501
note.
Deadline.
Designation.
34 USC 30501
note.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00002 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS
3. 135 STAT. 267
PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (division E of Public
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2835) have enabled Federal authorities
to understand and, where appropriate, investigate and pros-
ecute hate crimes.
(4) A more complete understanding of the national problem
posed by hate crime is in the public interest and supports
the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence ref-
erenced in section 249(b)(1)(C) of title 18, United States Code.
(5) However, a complete understanding of the national
problem posed by hate crimes is hindered by incomplete data
from Federal, State, and local jurisdictions through the Uniform
Crime Reports program authorized under section 534 of title
28, United States Code, and administered by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation.
(6) Multiple factors contribute to the provision of inaccurate
and incomplete data regarding the incidence of hate crime
through the Uniform Crime Reports program. A significant
contributing factor is the quality and quantity of training that
State and local law enforcement agencies receive on the identi-
fication and reporting of suspected bias-motivated crimes.
(7) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently
serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant
Federal financial assistance to States and local jurisdictions.
(8) Federal financial assistance with regard to certain vio-
lent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and local
authorities to work together as partners in the investigation
and prosecution of such crimes.
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(1) HATE CRIME.—The term ‘‘hate crime’’ means an act
described in section 245, 247, or 249 of title 18, United States
Code, or in section 901 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42
U.S.C. 3631).
(2) PRIORITY AGENCY.—The term ‘‘priority agency’’ means—
(A) a law enforcement agency of a unit of local govern-
ment that serves a population of not less than 100,000,
as computed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; or
(B) a law enforcement agency of a unit of local govern-
ment that—
(i) serves a population of not less than 50,000
and less than 100,000, as computed by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation; and
(ii) has reported no hate crimes through the Uni-
form Crime Reports program in each of the 3 most
recent calendar years for which such data is available.
(3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ has the meaning given the
term in section 901 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control
and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10251).
(4) UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS.—The term ‘‘Uniform Crime
Reports’’ means the reports authorized under section 534 of
title 28, United States Code, and administered by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation that compile nationwide criminal statis-
tics for use—
(A) in law enforcement administration, operation, and
management; and
(B) to assess the nature and type of crime in the
United States.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00003 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS
4. 135 STAT. 268 PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
(5) UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT.—The term ‘‘unit of local
government’’ has the meaning given the term in section 901
of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act
of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10251).
(d) REPORTING OF HATE CRIMES.—
(1) IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may make
grants to States and units of local government to assist
the State or unit of local government in implementing
the National Incident-Based Reporting System, including
to train employees in identifying and classifying hate
crimes in the National Incident-Based Reporting System.
(B) PRIORITY.—In making grants under subparagraph
(A), the Attorney General shall give priority to States and
units of local government that develop and implement the
programs and activities described in subsection (f)(2)(A).
(2) REPORTING.—
(A) COMPLIANCE.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in clause (ii),
in each fiscal year beginning after the date that is
3 years after the date on which a State or unit of
local government first receives a grant under para-
graph (1), the State or unit of local government shall
provide to the Attorney General, through the Uniform
Crime Reporting system, information pertaining to
hate crimes committed in that jurisdiction during the
preceding fiscal year.
(ii) EXTENSIONS; WAIVER.—The Attorney General—
(I) may provide a 120-day extension to a State
or unit of local government that is making good
faith efforts to comply with clause (i); and
(II) shall waive the requirements of clause
(i) if compliance with that subparagraph by a State
or unit of local government would be unconstitu-
tional under the constitution of the State or of
the State in which the unit of local government
is located, respectively.
(B) FAILURE TO COMPLY.—If a State or unit of local
government that receives a grant under paragraph (1) fails
to substantially comply with subparagraph (A) of this para-
graph, the State or unit of local government shall repay
the grant in full, plus reasonable interest and penalty
charges allowable by law or established by the Attorney
General.
(e) GRANTS FOR STATE-RUN HATE CRIME HOTLINES.—
(1) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall make
grants to States to create State-run hate crime reporting
hotlines.
(B) GRANT PERIOD.—A grant made under subparagraph
(A) shall be for a period of not more than 5 years.
(2) HOTLINE REQUIREMENTS.—A State shall ensure, with
respect to a hotline funded by a grant under paragraph (1),
that—
(A) the hotline directs individuals to—
(i) law enforcement if appropriate; and
(ii) local support services;
Time period.
Effective date.
State and local
governments.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00004 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS
5. 135 STAT. 269
PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
(B) any personally identifiable information that an
individual provides to an agency of the State through the
hotline is not directly or indirectly disclosed, without the
consent of the individual, to—
(i) any other agency of that State;
(ii) any other State;
(iii) the Federal Government; or
(iv) any other person or entity;
(C) the staff members who operate the hotline are
trained to be knowledgeable about—
(i) applicable Federal, State, and local hate crime
laws; and
(ii) local law enforcement resources and applicable
local support services; and
(D) the hotline is accessible to—
(i) individuals with limited English proficiency,
where appropriate; and
(ii) individuals with disabilities.
(3) BEST PRACTICES.—The Attorney General shall issue
guidance to States on best practices for implementing the
requirements of paragraph (2).
(f) INFORMATION COLLECTION BY STATES AND UNITS OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) COVERED AGENCY.—The term ‘‘covered agency’’
means—
(i) a State law enforcement agency; and
(ii) a priority agency.
(B) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term ‘‘eligible entity’’
means—
(i) a State; or
(ii) a unit of local government that has a priority
agency.
(2) GRANTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may make
grants to eligible entities to assist covered agencies within
the jurisdiction of the eligible entity in conducting law
enforcement activities or crime reduction programs to pre-
vent, address, or otherwise respond to hate crime, particu-
larly as those activities or programs relate to reporting
hate crimes through the Uniform Crime Reports program,
including—
(i) adopting a policy on identifying, investigating,
and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developing a standardized system of collecting,
analyzing, and reporting the incidence of hate crime;
(iii) establishing a unit specialized in identifying,
investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(iv) engaging in community relations functions
related to hate crime prevention and education such
as—
(I) establishing a liaison with formal commu-
nity-based organizations or leaders; and
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00005 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS
6. 135 STAT. 270 PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
(II) conducting public meetings or educational
forums on the impact of hate crimes, services avail-
able to hate crime victims, and the relevant Fed-
eral, State, and local laws pertaining to hate
crimes; and
(v) providing hate crime trainings for agency per-
sonnel.
(B) SUBGRANTS.—A State that receives a grant under
subparagraph (A) may award a subgrant to a unit of local
government within the State for the purposes under that
subparagraph, except that a unit of local government may
provide funding from such a subgrant to any law enforce-
ment agency of the unit of local government.
(3) INFORMATION REQUIRED OF STATES AND UNITS OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—For each fiscal year in which a State
or unit of local government receives a grant or subgrant
under paragraph (2), the State or unit of local government
shall—
(i) collect information from each law enforcement
agency that receives funding from the grant or
subgrant summarizing the law enforcement activities
or crime reduction programs conducted by the agency
to prevent, address, or otherwise respond to hate crime,
particularly as those activities or programs relate to
reporting hate crimes through the Uniform Crime
Reports program; and
(ii) submit to the Attorney General a report con-
taining the information collected under clause (i).
(B) SEMIANNUAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY REPORT.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—In collecting the information
required under subparagraph (A)(i), a State or unit
of local government shall require each law enforcement
agency that receives funding from a grant or subgrant
awarded to the State or unit of local government under
paragraph (2) to submit a semiannual report to the
State or unit of local government that includes a sum-
mary of the law enforcement activities or crime reduc-
tion programs conducted by the agency during the
reporting period to prevent, address, or otherwise
respond to hate crime, particularly as those activities
or programs relate to reporting hate crimes through
the Uniform Crime Reports program.
(ii) CONTENTS.—In a report submitted under clause
(i), a law enforcement agency shall, at a minimum,
disclose—
(I) whether the agency has adopted a policy
on identifying, investigating, and reporting hate
crimes;
(II) whether the agency has developed a
standardized system of collecting, analyzing, and
reporting the incidence of hate crime;
(III) whether the agency has established a unit
specialized in identifying, investigating, and
reporting hate crimes;
(IV) whether the agency engages in community
relations functions related to hate crime, such as—
Requirement.
Reports.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00006 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS
7. 135 STAT. 271
PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
(aa) establishing a liaison with formal
community-based organizations or leaders;
and
(bb) conducting public meetings or edu-
cational forums on the impact of hate crime,
services available to hate crime victims, and
the relevant Federal, State, and local laws
pertaining to hate crime; and
(V) the number of hate crime trainings for
agency personnel, including the duration of the
trainings, conducted by the agency during the
reporting period.
(4) COMPLIANCE AND REDIRECTION OF FUNDS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph
(B), beginning not later than 1 year after the date of
this Act, a State or unit of local government receiving
a grant or subgrant under paragraph (2) shall comply
with paragraph (3).
(B) EXTENSIONS; WAIVER.—The Attorney General—
(i) may provide a 120-day extension to a State
or unit of local government that is making good faith
efforts to collect the information required under para-
graph (3); and
(ii) shall waive the requirements of paragraph (3)
for a State or unit of local government if compliance
with that subsection by the State or unit of local
government would be unconstitutional under the con-
stitution of the State or of the State in which the
unit of local government is located, respectively.
(g) REQUIREMENTS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.—
(1) INFORMATION COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS; REPORT.—In
order to improve the accuracy of data regarding the incidence
of hate crime provided through the Uniform Crime Reports
program, and promote a more complete understanding of the
national problem posed by hate crime, the Attorney General
shall—
(A) collect and analyze the information provided by
States and units of local government under subsection (f)
for the purpose of developing policies related to the provi-
sion of accurate data obtained under the Hate Crime Statis-
tics Act (Public Law 101–275; 28 U.S.C. 534 note) by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
(B) for each calendar year beginning after the date
of enactment of this Act, publish and submit to Congress
a report based on the information collected and analyzed
under subparagraph (A).
(2) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—A report submitted under para-
graph (1) shall include—
(A) a qualitative analysis of the relationship between—
(i) the number of hate crimes reported by State
law enforcement agencies or other law enforcement
agencies that received funding from a grant or
subgrant awarded under paragraph (2) through the
Uniform Crime Reports program; and
(ii) the nature and extent of law enforcement
activities or crime reduction programs conducted by
Analysis.
Time period.
Effective date.
Deadline.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00007 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS
8. 135 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 117–13—MAY 20, 2021
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 937:
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 167 (2021):
Apr. 19, 20, 22, considered and passed Senate.
May 18, considered and passed House.
DAILY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS (2021):
May 20, Presidential remarks.
Æ
those agencies to prevent, address, or otherwise
respond to hate crime; and
(B) a quantitative analysis of the number of State
law enforcement agencies and other law enforcement agen-
cies that received funding from a grant or subgrant
awarded under paragraph (2) that have—
(i) adopted a policy on identifying, investigating,
and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developed a standardized system of collecting,
analyzing, and reporting the incidence of hate crime;
(iii) established a unit specialized in identifying,
investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(iv) engaged in community relations functions
related to hate crime, such as—
(I) establishing a liaison with formal commu-
nity-based organizations or leaders; and
(II) conducting public meetings or educational
forums on the impact of hate crime, services avail-
able to hate crime victims, and the relevant Fed-
eral, State, and local laws pertaining to hate crime;
and
(v) conducted hate crime trainings for agency per-
sonnel during the reporting period, including—
(I) the total number of trainings conducted
by each agency; and
(II) the duration of the trainings described
in subclause (I).
(h) ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING.—Section 249 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) SUPERVISED RELEASE.—If a court includes, as a part of
a sentence of imprisonment imposed for a violation of subsection
(a), a requirement that the defendant be placed on a term of
supervised release after imprisonment under section 3583, the court
may order, as an explicit condition of supervised release, that
the defendant undertake educational classes or community service
directly related to the community harmed by the defendant’s
offense.’’.
Approved May 20, 2021.
Courts.
Requirement.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:29 May 28, 2021 Jkt 019139 PO 00013 Frm 00008 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6580 E:PUBLAWPUBL013.117 PUBL013
dkrause
on
LAP5T8D0R2PROD
with
PUBLAWS