This document discusses gun control and presents arguments for increased regulation of firearms. It notes that the types of weapons available today fire much faster than muskets from the 18th century. While some argue that increased controls won't help, the document asserts that making guns harder to obtain could reduce mass shootings and other gun violence. It calls for universal background checks, addressing mental health issues, and allowing health providers to report on patients' gun ownership. The document aims to invite people to support increased regulation and join Moms for Gun Control on Facebook.
This power point goes a little more in depth then the paper. As well as covers more area.
The paper is what I did for you your class.
this power point is one I did for Physiology 101.
This is a lecture by Dr. Jim Holliman from the Ghana Emergency Medicine Collaborative. To download the editable version (in PPT), to access additional learning modules, or to learn more about the project, see http://openmi.ch/em-gemc. Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike-3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/.
The document discusses arguments for and against enacting more gun control laws in the United States. It begins by providing background information on gun ownership rates in the U.S. and the Second Amendment. It then outlines the key considerations in the debate, such as the impact of gun control laws on violence in other countries, the effect on lawful gun owners' rights, and the types of weapons citizens should be allowed to purchase. The document aims to guide students in evaluating both sides of the issue by considering the reliability of research, the use of logic and facts, and determining which arguments are best supported by evidence.
This document summarizes a research paper that analyzes the relationship between state fragility and domestic terrorism. It hypothesizes that among the weakest states, democracies are more likely to experience domestic terrorism than autocracies. The document reviews different scholarly perspectives on the causes of domestic terrorism and the idea that weak democracies provide civil liberties that terrorist can exploit. It outlines the paper's claims that weak states in general experience more domestic terrorism and that within weak states, democracies experience more such attacks than autocracies due to poor security and fewer government controls.
Volume 7, Issue 1 (2014) of the Journal of Physical Security, a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, development, modeling, testing, experimentation, and analysis of physical security. Includes both technical and social science approaches.
This issue has 7 papers on the following topics: testing locks; seals and nuclear safeguards; a security thought experiment; vulnerability assessment issues; the levels of critical infrastructure risk; and community partnerships for counteracting radicalization.
For more information about JPS, to download individual papers from this or earlier issues, or to get on the email notification list, see http://jps.anl.gov
The document discusses the ongoing debate around gun control in America. It references several mass shootings over the past 15 years and notes how gun control is debated after each one. However, it argues that less gun legislation is needed and that guns themselves are not to blame - it is the person behind the trigger. It cites evidence from studies that found no link between strict gun laws and lower murder/crime rates. Overall the document makes the case that controlling violent individuals is more important than controlling guns, and that banning guns would not solve violence since people will find other weapons.
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner completeGerald Furnkranz
This document is a table of contents for a book titled "Commonsense Political Thinking of a Common Man" containing 53 articles published in 2013. The articles cover topics related to gun control, the Obama administration, immigration reform, and other political issues. The table of contents lists the article titles and dates of publication.
This document discusses gun control and presents arguments for increased regulation of firearms. It notes that the types of weapons available today fire much faster than muskets from the 18th century. While some argue that increased controls won't help, the document asserts that making guns harder to obtain could reduce mass shootings and other gun violence. It calls for universal background checks, addressing mental health issues, and allowing health providers to report on patients' gun ownership. The document aims to invite people to support increased regulation and join Moms for Gun Control on Facebook.
This power point goes a little more in depth then the paper. As well as covers more area.
The paper is what I did for you your class.
this power point is one I did for Physiology 101.
This is a lecture by Dr. Jim Holliman from the Ghana Emergency Medicine Collaborative. To download the editable version (in PPT), to access additional learning modules, or to learn more about the project, see http://openmi.ch/em-gemc. Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike-3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/.
The document discusses arguments for and against enacting more gun control laws in the United States. It begins by providing background information on gun ownership rates in the U.S. and the Second Amendment. It then outlines the key considerations in the debate, such as the impact of gun control laws on violence in other countries, the effect on lawful gun owners' rights, and the types of weapons citizens should be allowed to purchase. The document aims to guide students in evaluating both sides of the issue by considering the reliability of research, the use of logic and facts, and determining which arguments are best supported by evidence.
This document summarizes a research paper that analyzes the relationship between state fragility and domestic terrorism. It hypothesizes that among the weakest states, democracies are more likely to experience domestic terrorism than autocracies. The document reviews different scholarly perspectives on the causes of domestic terrorism and the idea that weak democracies provide civil liberties that terrorist can exploit. It outlines the paper's claims that weak states in general experience more domestic terrorism and that within weak states, democracies experience more such attacks than autocracies due to poor security and fewer government controls.
Volume 7, Issue 1 (2014) of the Journal of Physical Security, a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, development, modeling, testing, experimentation, and analysis of physical security. Includes both technical and social science approaches.
This issue has 7 papers on the following topics: testing locks; seals and nuclear safeguards; a security thought experiment; vulnerability assessment issues; the levels of critical infrastructure risk; and community partnerships for counteracting radicalization.
For more information about JPS, to download individual papers from this or earlier issues, or to get on the email notification list, see http://jps.anl.gov
The document discusses the ongoing debate around gun control in America. It references several mass shootings over the past 15 years and notes how gun control is debated after each one. However, it argues that less gun legislation is needed and that guns themselves are not to blame - it is the person behind the trigger. It cites evidence from studies that found no link between strict gun laws and lower murder/crime rates. Overall the document makes the case that controlling violent individuals is more important than controlling guns, and that banning guns would not solve violence since people will find other weapons.
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner completeGerald Furnkranz
This document is a table of contents for a book titled "Commonsense Political Thinking of a Common Man" containing 53 articles published in 2013. The articles cover topics related to gun control, the Obama administration, immigration reform, and other political issues. The table of contents lists the article titles and dates of publication.
Gabriella Grant, Director of the California Center of Excellence for Trauma Informed Care, presented at the 8th Annual Fall Trauma Conference on trends in violence over time. She summarized that while the US homicide and violent crime rates have significantly decreased over the long term, it remains more armed than other nations due to high gun ownership. The pandemic saw a rise in homicides but an overall crime decrease. Firearm deaths have increased disproportionately in the US compared to other countries with stricter gun laws and lower ownership rates.
This document discusses gun deaths and gun control policy in the United States by analyzing statistics on causes of death, gun ownership, and homicides. It finds that while gun homicides receive much media attention, they account for less than 1% of total deaths in the US. Many other preventable causes of death like obesity, smoking and traffic accidents kill far more people each year. It also shows that demographic groups with higher gun ownership rates like older white males have lower homicide rates. The document questions whether limiting access to guns is the most effective way to reduce homicides and suggests addressing root causes like education, the economy, and mental health.
Gun availability is strongly correlated with female homicide rates in high-income countries, as women are more at risk of being killed by intimate partners or family with access to a firearm in the home. While violent crime has decreased in the US in the last 20 years, the decline in firearm homicide rates has slowed since 2000, suggesting that firearm homicides are prevalent not only in criminal activities but also in other contexts. More detailed statistical data is needed to better understand patterns between homicide mechanisms and typologies in different regions.
The document summarizes the key points of debate around gun control legislation. It discusses the sociological, ethical, and legal dimensions being debated, including the effectiveness of gun laws and interpretation of Second Amendment rights. Supporters argue stricter laws could reduce gun violence based on statistics from other countries with strict laws and background checks could respect gun rights. Opponents counter that statistics don't prove regulation reduces crime and that additional laws could infringe on constitutional rights. Alternative policies proposed include assault weapons bans and background checks. The implications for families and society are also debated.
Masculinity in the American military culture and the occurrence of the rape p...Anne-Lise Vray
This dissertation examines the relationship between masculinity in American military culture and the prevalence of rape through a gender perspective. It argues that the extreme form of emphasized masculinity within the military contributes to a culture that rationalizes and increases the risk of sexual harassment, assault, and rape. The dissertation will analyze how military gender constructions and narratives influence sexual behaviors, such as rape being used to demonstrate power or relieve sexual tension according to gender roles. It will also distinguish between male and female rape in the military, though both are ultimately driven by expectations of masculinity and femininity.
This document summarizes and debates the key issues around gun control policies in the United States. It discusses the major debate around interpreting the Second Amendment and whether more legislation is needed to reduce gun violence or if better enforcement of current laws is sufficient. Both sides of the debate are presented, with arguments that stricter gun control could reduce crimes but may infringe on constitutional rights, and that people rather than guns are usually the root cause of violence. The document does not find clear evidence that gun control laws are effective in lowering violence and suggests they may unfairly punish law-abiding gun owners.
This document discusses increasing gun control legislation in the United States. It notes that nearly 30,000 people die each year from gun violence, despite existing gun laws. The author argues that stricter laws are needed, such as banning assault weapons, requiring background checks for all gun purchases, and enforcing existing laws more strictly. The document also references studies showing that nations with stricter gun control, like Canada, Britain, and Japan, have lower rates of gun homicides than the U.S. It concludes that with stronger regulation of firearms and penalties for violations, gun violence in America could be reduced.
This document examines Obama's views on gun control and gun violence in America. It discusses Obama's support for stricter gun laws and bans throughout his political career. The document also analyzes statistics on gun violence and the effects of concealed carry laws and assault weapons bans, finding no definitive evidence that stricter laws reduce violence. Homicide rates were lower in Houston, which has concealed carry, compared to Chicago, which has banned guns. In conclusion, while gun violence has declined since 2008, the causes are unclear and research does not provide a conclusive answer on the impact of gun control laws.
This document discusses debates around gun control policies in the United States. It presents arguments from sources on both sides of the issue. Some argue that stricter gun control could reduce gun violence, while others say there is no evidence it would solve the underlying problems. The document also examines proposals such as restricting certain types of guns and requiring background checks for mental health. Overall, it analyzes the complex issues around balancing gun rights with public safety in the U.S.
The document discusses differing views on gun control. Those who want stricter laws believe it could reduce mass killings and firearm deaths. However, others argue that the Second Amendment protects their right to own guns for self-defense. Both sides want public safety but disagree on the best approach. The author proposes keeping most gun laws the same but increasing restrictions on assault weapons through longer waiting periods and background checks.
James O'Keefe released three undercover videos via social media from October 17-24 exposing alleged voter fraud by the Democratic campaign. The videos were widely viewed online and discussed in media outlets. However, some media organizations questioned the validity of O'Keefe's videos and his motivations as a conservative activist. The videos led to resignations but also divided public opinions, with some praising the exposure of corruption while others criticized O'Keefe's tactics and history of selectively editing videos. The study analyzed how O'Keefe utilized social media and the varied media and public reactions to bypass traditional journalism.
This report analyzes mass public shootings since 2009. It finds that claims of an "explosion" in such shootings over the last 5 years are inaccurate, as the number of attacks and deaths have slightly declined. These shootings differ from other mass killings in that the attackers usually intend to die at the scene and over half have a documented mental illness. The report also finds major errors and exaggerations in a recent analysis of mass shootings by Everytown for Gun Safety. Specifically, Everytown incorrectly classified some incidents as mass shootings and made mistakes in reporting the mental health and demographic data of the attackers.
The document summarizes Dennis Prager's perspective on the "beer summit" meeting between President Obama, Professor Gates, and Sgt. Crowley. It argues that:
1) Conservatives were unaware that Biden was invited to provide "racial balance" and make it two black men and two white men.
2) Liberals are more focused on race than values or individual qualities.
3) The incident showed that liberals and many blacks see more racism in America than actually exists and are unwilling to acknowledge progress.
4) The election of Obama has not changed this perspective for most liberals and blacks.
The document analyzes 133 mass shootings that occurred in the United States between January 2009 and July 2015. Some key findings included: there were nearly two mass shootings per month on average; perpetrators were generally older than 34 years old; in 57% of cases the shooter had a domestic relationship with at least one victim; high-capacity magazines resulted in more victims; and most shootings occurred in private homes rather than public spaces. The analysis found that improved enforcement of existing prohibitions could potentially curb some mass shootings conducted by prohibited purchasers.
This document discusses debates around gun control and analyzes three essays on the topic. The essays addressed whether the Second Amendment is valid, what qualifies as an assault weapon, background checks, the role of people versus guns in violence, the impact of newer gun technologies, and whether gun control raises or lowers violence. Supporters of more gun control argue it would reduce shootings and deaths, while opponents argue it could spark riots and lead to black markets for illegal guns. The document analyzes logical fallacies in the essays and notes the debates aim to inform the public on gun control issues to promote safety. It concludes by arguing fewer gun laws may decrease violence by reducing desires to obtain illegal weapons or make their own.
A stastistical analysis of homicide incidents in US (1980 to 2014)Arafath Hossain
What is the trend of gun-related homicide in the US history? Do issues like ethnicity play any role?
What do the places with good records do differently than the places with bad records? This report was an attempt to find answers to such questions.
Statistical techniques that were used in the report were correlation analysis, chi-square test, and logistic regression.
Software used for analysis was R.
Some of the interesting findings are:
- The highest number of homicides take place in July and August compared to other months
- Rifle is more common firearm among Native Americans/Alaska Natives compared to other ethnicities
- Intra-race homicide (e.g. whites murdered by whites) is way more common than inter-race ones (e.g. blacks murdered by whites)
- Though inter-race homicide is more common between whites and Native Americans (close to 40% of the homicides in native Americans were done by white)
- The highest number of murderers are acquaintances not strangers!
- Unlike common notion, places with less homicide are not the places with the strictest gun laws.
- Rather intuitively enough they are better at solving cases (they have a better ratio of solving case compared to the places with bad records).
The document discusses perspectives on gun control from both pro-gun and anti-gun positions. Pro-gun arguments include that the second amendment protects gun ownership as an individual right, and that gun control laws infringe on self-defense rights. Anti-gun arguments are that common sense restrictions like background checks have broad public support, and countries with stricter gun laws have lower gun death rates than the U.S. The document also provides statistics on U.S. firearm deaths and defensive gun uses.
David Hemenway: "Outgunned: America’s Public Health Crisis"reportingonhealth
David Hemenway's slides from the Center for Health Journalism webinar, "Outgunned: America’s Public Health Crisis," 3.13.18
More info: https://www.centerforhealthjournalism.org/content/outgunned-americas-public-health-crisis
Use of Cyber Proxy Forces in Unconventional WarfareDavid Sweigert
The unrest in Baltimore in April 2015 was effectively responded to due to relationships built through prior interagency planning and training. The Maryland National Guard, Maryland Emergency Management Agency, and Baltimore City Police developed trust and understanding through exercises on responding to civil disturbances. This facilitated coordination and unified response during Operation Baltimore Rally, minimizing impacts. Planning shifted to focus on specific hazards, improving response plans. Interagency coordination increased through leader engagement and staff integration. When unrest occurred, the established relationships supported an effective response.
Electronic Media And United States TerrorismThomas Riner
This document analyzes the relationship between increased availability of electronic media and domestic terrorism in the United States over the last 20 years. It finds that while electronic media access has greatly increased, the number of indicted or killed domestic terrorists has not shown a clear rising trend. Statistical analysis finds no significant difference between the number of terrorist cases in recent years compared to earlier years, despite vast growth in internet usage. While electronic tools may aid terrorist communications, the data does not support the hypothesis that increased information access has led to more domestic terror cells or activities in the U.S.
Running head INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM1.docxcowinhelen
Running head: INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM 1
INEFFECTIVENESS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM 8
Ineffectiveness of the Capital Punishment System
Name
Introduction
Capital punishment is one of the major social issues affecting the sustenance of peace, democracy and mutual coexistence in the United States. Capital punishment is sometimes referred to as the death penalty and is largely recognized as a lawful sentence in 31 out of 50 states found in the United States. The Eighth Amendment constrains the application to disturbed killings submitted by rationally capable grown-ups. Historical analysis reveal that this mode of punishment began officially in 1776 after being authorized for identical law offences in the greater part of the American provinces preceding the country’s independence. This paper seeks to establish the ineffectiveness of the entire system and conclude by providing alternative solutions.
Problem Statement
According to Melusky and Pesto (2011), capital punishment in America is a broken procedure existing as a major social challenge. Currently, many opponents have risen to criticize and champion for the abolishment of the capital punishment due to its alleged ineffectiveness. These forms of punishments are anticipated not by the grievousness of the wrongdoing but rather by the low quality of the safeguard legal advisors, the race of the blamed or the casualty, and the district and state in which the wrongdoing happened.
On numerous occasions, research has shown that the criminal equity framework neglects to secure the poor and persons with genuine mental inabilities and ailments from execution (Melusky & Pesto, 2011). Indeed, even the organization of executions is totally defective: Every strategy for execution accompanies a heinously high danger of great agony and torment. Today, open backing for capital punishment is falling; the quantities of new capital punishments and executions are both quickly diminishing, it perhaps communicates the message that the time is ripe for America to end this fizzled test. It is, therefore, imperative to discuss the ineffective of capital punishment as a social issue in the United States.
Current Statistical Overview
Previous statistics reveal that thirty-five prisoners were executed last year in the U.S., and over 3,000 were on a death row. From 1976 to 2015, 1,392 executions happened in the United States, and 995 of them occurred in the South. Nonetheless, this deadly infusion has been the most widely recognized technique since the late 1970s. Thirty-four states have had executions since the death penalty was restored in 1976. Some of the states that took a lead role in the implementation of this awful law included Oklahoma, Ohio, Missouri, Texas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia and Virginia. Additionally, these states were accused to have executed the law with relative recurrence. However, Texas and Oklahoma led the charge, with the most executions, and the m ...
Gabriella Grant, Director of the California Center of Excellence for Trauma Informed Care, presented at the 8th Annual Fall Trauma Conference on trends in violence over time. She summarized that while the US homicide and violent crime rates have significantly decreased over the long term, it remains more armed than other nations due to high gun ownership. The pandemic saw a rise in homicides but an overall crime decrease. Firearm deaths have increased disproportionately in the US compared to other countries with stricter gun laws and lower ownership rates.
This document discusses gun deaths and gun control policy in the United States by analyzing statistics on causes of death, gun ownership, and homicides. It finds that while gun homicides receive much media attention, they account for less than 1% of total deaths in the US. Many other preventable causes of death like obesity, smoking and traffic accidents kill far more people each year. It also shows that demographic groups with higher gun ownership rates like older white males have lower homicide rates. The document questions whether limiting access to guns is the most effective way to reduce homicides and suggests addressing root causes like education, the economy, and mental health.
Gun availability is strongly correlated with female homicide rates in high-income countries, as women are more at risk of being killed by intimate partners or family with access to a firearm in the home. While violent crime has decreased in the US in the last 20 years, the decline in firearm homicide rates has slowed since 2000, suggesting that firearm homicides are prevalent not only in criminal activities but also in other contexts. More detailed statistical data is needed to better understand patterns between homicide mechanisms and typologies in different regions.
The document summarizes the key points of debate around gun control legislation. It discusses the sociological, ethical, and legal dimensions being debated, including the effectiveness of gun laws and interpretation of Second Amendment rights. Supporters argue stricter laws could reduce gun violence based on statistics from other countries with strict laws and background checks could respect gun rights. Opponents counter that statistics don't prove regulation reduces crime and that additional laws could infringe on constitutional rights. Alternative policies proposed include assault weapons bans and background checks. The implications for families and society are also debated.
Masculinity in the American military culture and the occurrence of the rape p...Anne-Lise Vray
This dissertation examines the relationship between masculinity in American military culture and the prevalence of rape through a gender perspective. It argues that the extreme form of emphasized masculinity within the military contributes to a culture that rationalizes and increases the risk of sexual harassment, assault, and rape. The dissertation will analyze how military gender constructions and narratives influence sexual behaviors, such as rape being used to demonstrate power or relieve sexual tension according to gender roles. It will also distinguish between male and female rape in the military, though both are ultimately driven by expectations of masculinity and femininity.
This document summarizes and debates the key issues around gun control policies in the United States. It discusses the major debate around interpreting the Second Amendment and whether more legislation is needed to reduce gun violence or if better enforcement of current laws is sufficient. Both sides of the debate are presented, with arguments that stricter gun control could reduce crimes but may infringe on constitutional rights, and that people rather than guns are usually the root cause of violence. The document does not find clear evidence that gun control laws are effective in lowering violence and suggests they may unfairly punish law-abiding gun owners.
This document discusses increasing gun control legislation in the United States. It notes that nearly 30,000 people die each year from gun violence, despite existing gun laws. The author argues that stricter laws are needed, such as banning assault weapons, requiring background checks for all gun purchases, and enforcing existing laws more strictly. The document also references studies showing that nations with stricter gun control, like Canada, Britain, and Japan, have lower rates of gun homicides than the U.S. It concludes that with stronger regulation of firearms and penalties for violations, gun violence in America could be reduced.
This document examines Obama's views on gun control and gun violence in America. It discusses Obama's support for stricter gun laws and bans throughout his political career. The document also analyzes statistics on gun violence and the effects of concealed carry laws and assault weapons bans, finding no definitive evidence that stricter laws reduce violence. Homicide rates were lower in Houston, which has concealed carry, compared to Chicago, which has banned guns. In conclusion, while gun violence has declined since 2008, the causes are unclear and research does not provide a conclusive answer on the impact of gun control laws.
This document discusses debates around gun control policies in the United States. It presents arguments from sources on both sides of the issue. Some argue that stricter gun control could reduce gun violence, while others say there is no evidence it would solve the underlying problems. The document also examines proposals such as restricting certain types of guns and requiring background checks for mental health. Overall, it analyzes the complex issues around balancing gun rights with public safety in the U.S.
The document discusses differing views on gun control. Those who want stricter laws believe it could reduce mass killings and firearm deaths. However, others argue that the Second Amendment protects their right to own guns for self-defense. Both sides want public safety but disagree on the best approach. The author proposes keeping most gun laws the same but increasing restrictions on assault weapons through longer waiting periods and background checks.
James O'Keefe released three undercover videos via social media from October 17-24 exposing alleged voter fraud by the Democratic campaign. The videos were widely viewed online and discussed in media outlets. However, some media organizations questioned the validity of O'Keefe's videos and his motivations as a conservative activist. The videos led to resignations but also divided public opinions, with some praising the exposure of corruption while others criticized O'Keefe's tactics and history of selectively editing videos. The study analyzed how O'Keefe utilized social media and the varied media and public reactions to bypass traditional journalism.
This report analyzes mass public shootings since 2009. It finds that claims of an "explosion" in such shootings over the last 5 years are inaccurate, as the number of attacks and deaths have slightly declined. These shootings differ from other mass killings in that the attackers usually intend to die at the scene and over half have a documented mental illness. The report also finds major errors and exaggerations in a recent analysis of mass shootings by Everytown for Gun Safety. Specifically, Everytown incorrectly classified some incidents as mass shootings and made mistakes in reporting the mental health and demographic data of the attackers.
The document summarizes Dennis Prager's perspective on the "beer summit" meeting between President Obama, Professor Gates, and Sgt. Crowley. It argues that:
1) Conservatives were unaware that Biden was invited to provide "racial balance" and make it two black men and two white men.
2) Liberals are more focused on race than values or individual qualities.
3) The incident showed that liberals and many blacks see more racism in America than actually exists and are unwilling to acknowledge progress.
4) The election of Obama has not changed this perspective for most liberals and blacks.
The document analyzes 133 mass shootings that occurred in the United States between January 2009 and July 2015. Some key findings included: there were nearly two mass shootings per month on average; perpetrators were generally older than 34 years old; in 57% of cases the shooter had a domestic relationship with at least one victim; high-capacity magazines resulted in more victims; and most shootings occurred in private homes rather than public spaces. The analysis found that improved enforcement of existing prohibitions could potentially curb some mass shootings conducted by prohibited purchasers.
This document discusses debates around gun control and analyzes three essays on the topic. The essays addressed whether the Second Amendment is valid, what qualifies as an assault weapon, background checks, the role of people versus guns in violence, the impact of newer gun technologies, and whether gun control raises or lowers violence. Supporters of more gun control argue it would reduce shootings and deaths, while opponents argue it could spark riots and lead to black markets for illegal guns. The document analyzes logical fallacies in the essays and notes the debates aim to inform the public on gun control issues to promote safety. It concludes by arguing fewer gun laws may decrease violence by reducing desires to obtain illegal weapons or make their own.
A stastistical analysis of homicide incidents in US (1980 to 2014)Arafath Hossain
What is the trend of gun-related homicide in the US history? Do issues like ethnicity play any role?
What do the places with good records do differently than the places with bad records? This report was an attempt to find answers to such questions.
Statistical techniques that were used in the report were correlation analysis, chi-square test, and logistic regression.
Software used for analysis was R.
Some of the interesting findings are:
- The highest number of homicides take place in July and August compared to other months
- Rifle is more common firearm among Native Americans/Alaska Natives compared to other ethnicities
- Intra-race homicide (e.g. whites murdered by whites) is way more common than inter-race ones (e.g. blacks murdered by whites)
- Though inter-race homicide is more common between whites and Native Americans (close to 40% of the homicides in native Americans were done by white)
- The highest number of murderers are acquaintances not strangers!
- Unlike common notion, places with less homicide are not the places with the strictest gun laws.
- Rather intuitively enough they are better at solving cases (they have a better ratio of solving case compared to the places with bad records).
The document discusses perspectives on gun control from both pro-gun and anti-gun positions. Pro-gun arguments include that the second amendment protects gun ownership as an individual right, and that gun control laws infringe on self-defense rights. Anti-gun arguments are that common sense restrictions like background checks have broad public support, and countries with stricter gun laws have lower gun death rates than the U.S. The document also provides statistics on U.S. firearm deaths and defensive gun uses.
David Hemenway: "Outgunned: America’s Public Health Crisis"reportingonhealth
David Hemenway's slides from the Center for Health Journalism webinar, "Outgunned: America’s Public Health Crisis," 3.13.18
More info: https://www.centerforhealthjournalism.org/content/outgunned-americas-public-health-crisis
Use of Cyber Proxy Forces in Unconventional WarfareDavid Sweigert
The unrest in Baltimore in April 2015 was effectively responded to due to relationships built through prior interagency planning and training. The Maryland National Guard, Maryland Emergency Management Agency, and Baltimore City Police developed trust and understanding through exercises on responding to civil disturbances. This facilitated coordination and unified response during Operation Baltimore Rally, minimizing impacts. Planning shifted to focus on specific hazards, improving response plans. Interagency coordination increased through leader engagement and staff integration. When unrest occurred, the established relationships supported an effective response.
Electronic Media And United States TerrorismThomas Riner
This document analyzes the relationship between increased availability of electronic media and domestic terrorism in the United States over the last 20 years. It finds that while electronic media access has greatly increased, the number of indicted or killed domestic terrorists has not shown a clear rising trend. Statistical analysis finds no significant difference between the number of terrorist cases in recent years compared to earlier years, despite vast growth in internet usage. While electronic tools may aid terrorist communications, the data does not support the hypothesis that increased information access has led to more domestic terror cells or activities in the U.S.
Running head INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM1.docxcowinhelen
Running head: INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM 1
INEFFECTIVENESS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM 8
Ineffectiveness of the Capital Punishment System
Name
Introduction
Capital punishment is one of the major social issues affecting the sustenance of peace, democracy and mutual coexistence in the United States. Capital punishment is sometimes referred to as the death penalty and is largely recognized as a lawful sentence in 31 out of 50 states found in the United States. The Eighth Amendment constrains the application to disturbed killings submitted by rationally capable grown-ups. Historical analysis reveal that this mode of punishment began officially in 1776 after being authorized for identical law offences in the greater part of the American provinces preceding the country’s independence. This paper seeks to establish the ineffectiveness of the entire system and conclude by providing alternative solutions.
Problem Statement
According to Melusky and Pesto (2011), capital punishment in America is a broken procedure existing as a major social challenge. Currently, many opponents have risen to criticize and champion for the abolishment of the capital punishment due to its alleged ineffectiveness. These forms of punishments are anticipated not by the grievousness of the wrongdoing but rather by the low quality of the safeguard legal advisors, the race of the blamed or the casualty, and the district and state in which the wrongdoing happened.
On numerous occasions, research has shown that the criminal equity framework neglects to secure the poor and persons with genuine mental inabilities and ailments from execution (Melusky & Pesto, 2011). Indeed, even the organization of executions is totally defective: Every strategy for execution accompanies a heinously high danger of great agony and torment. Today, open backing for capital punishment is falling; the quantities of new capital punishments and executions are both quickly diminishing, it perhaps communicates the message that the time is ripe for America to end this fizzled test. It is, therefore, imperative to discuss the ineffective of capital punishment as a social issue in the United States.
Current Statistical Overview
Previous statistics reveal that thirty-five prisoners were executed last year in the U.S., and over 3,000 were on a death row. From 1976 to 2015, 1,392 executions happened in the United States, and 995 of them occurred in the South. Nonetheless, this deadly infusion has been the most widely recognized technique since the late 1970s. Thirty-four states have had executions since the death penalty was restored in 1976. Some of the states that took a lead role in the implementation of this awful law included Oklahoma, Ohio, Missouri, Texas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia and Virginia. Additionally, these states were accused to have executed the law with relative recurrence. However, Texas and Oklahoma led the charge, with the most executions, and the m ...
Gun control is a highly controversial issue in American politics with ongoing debate about its impact on violent crime. Research has produced mixed results, with some studies finding that stricter gun laws reduce violent crime and others finding no impact. Proponents of gun rights believe the Second Amendment guarantees individual gun ownership rights, while advocates of gun control see it as a collective right. Obtaining guns illegally remains a problem, as many criminals acquire firearms through means such as straw purchases or theft despite existing laws. The impact of gun control measures on curbing gun violence remains unclear based on conflicting research findings.
This document describes a statistical analysis of factors correlating with firearm fatalities in the United States. The analysis used multiple regression to evaluate the relationship between firearm fatalities (dependent variable) and several independent variables like education levels, income, religion, gun ownership, etc. The analysis found that firearm fatalities were best predicted by a model including college education rates, gun ownership, high school dropout rates, housing prices, law enforcement levels, and some interaction terms between these variables. Assumption checks confirmed the model was appropriate. Some outliers were identified but not enough to warrant corrective measures.
This study uses regression analysis to examine the relationship between state-level firearm death rates in the US and several independent variables representing prevailing theories about the causes of gun deaths. The analysis finds that states with weaker gun laws and higher unemployment rates have statistically significant higher firearm death rates, while personal income, mental illness rates, and income inequality were not significant predictors. This provides support for the argument that lax gun regulation and poor economic conditions contribute to higher rates of gun deaths in the US.
The document argues that banning firearms will do more harm than good for several reasons:
1) Approximately 2.5 million Americans legally use guns each year to protect their families and livelihoods, and about 500,000 have used guns to save lives. For every gun death, 71 lives are protected and 14 lives are saved.
2) Criminals who break the law will still obtain guns illegally. Studies show that 55% of arrestees say they can get guns illegally and juveniles and adults can easily obtain illegal guns.
3) Countries that have recently strengthened gun laws have seen increases in violent crime, like a 40% rise in gun crime in the UK and a 51% rise in armed rob
Firearm suicide among the elderly poses a serious challenge to public health. One of the greatest barriers to finding a solution to this problem is the highly politicized and bipartisan nature of the gun control debate. This paper studies the underlying risk factors contributing to suicide and existing legislation to develop recommendations for reducing firearm suicide among the elderly. Various databases were searched for evidence of successful interventions including PscyhInfo, PubMed and Scopus. The search criteria were limited to studies published within the U.S. between 2008 and 2018. Based on available evidence, the social ecological model provides the best intervention for reducing firearm suicide and firearm mortality among the target population through small interventions at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, community and societal levels.
Kurnava_CyberStalking Vulnerability Research PaperMatthew Kurnava
This document summarizes a research paper on how advancements in technology have enhanced the ability to cyberstalk individuals. It begins with an introduction discussing a 1999 murder case where the perpetrator was able to track and kill the victim after becoming obsessed with her online. The paper then outlines the research question of how technology has allowed access to personal information and enabled stalking. It presents a hypothesis that technological advancements have increased capabilities but also privacy risks. The literature review discusses definitions of cyberstalking, laws, statistics on its prevalence, and a typology of cyber stalker behaviors. The methodology will qualitatively study how vulnerable a volunteer is to cyberstalking using different technologies like smartphones and computers.
This document discusses gun violence and gun control from a public health perspective. It provides data on the global burden of firearm injuries and deaths. In the US, firearm deaths exceed 48,000 annually, with over half being suicides. States with higher gun ownership rates have higher firearm suicide rates. While the 2nd Amendment addresses gun rights, gun control opponents are heavily funded by the powerful NRA lobby. There are strong arguments both for and against gun control. Treating gun violence as a public health issue, prevention strategies could integrate population-based and high-risk interventions using a social ecological model to address individual, relationship, community and societal risk factors.
Literary Analysis on Solving Problems in America's Law EnforcementStewart Fountain
This document analyzes previous research on police brutality. It discusses how underreporting of crimes and excessive use of force cases has led to uncertainty around the true extent of the problem. Sociological studies have attempted to understand why police brutality occurs and why some communities are unhappy with law enforcement. However, the document notes that reliable data is limited due to underreporting. Overall, the analysis finds that police brutality remains an issue that must be addressed to rebuild trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve.
The story of Dylann Roof (handout)
2nd Amendment
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.“
Individual interpretation influences a persons point of view on who has the right to "keep and bear arms"
The Second Amendment does not clearly define whom "the people" are.
Militia Act of 1903
Organized militia – consisting of State militia forces; notably, the National Guard and Naval Militia.
Unorganized militia – composing the Reserve Militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia.
So – who are the people?
United States Code, title 10, sec. 311 (1956)
Militia Composition and Classes
"The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States, and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard
So – who are the people?
Gun ownership advocates
2nd Amendment = any individual, whether in the military or not, should be allowed to own firearms.
The constitutional right should never be taken away because it would completely violate the purpose the bill of rights
Thomas Jefferson - "The strongest reason for the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject."
Self-protection = most common reasons for owning guns
SCOTUS – District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)
handout
Held: The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
Gun control advocates
Stricter laws, policies, regulations that address the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, or modification, or use of firearms citizens
More gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.
High-capacity magazines should be banned because they are related to mass murder.
More gun control laws needed to protect women from domestic abusers and stalkers.
Guns are rarely used in self-defense.
Legally owned guns frequently stolen and used by criminals.
Reduce the societal costs associated with gun violence.
A majority of adults, including gun owners, support common sense gun control such as background checks, bans on assault weapons, and bans on high capacity magazines
Fewer suicides.
Mandatory safety features would reduce the number of accidental gun deaths.
Presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent.
Armed civilians are unlikely to stop crimes and are more likely to make dangerous situations, including mass shootings, more deadly.
Countries with restrictive gun control laws have lower gun homicide and suicide rates than the United States.
Fact ...
Violent Crimes Report for Continental U.S. (1980 - 2009)Afroxl87
The document discusses violent crime rates in the continental United States from 1980 to 2009 based on FBI Uniform Crime Reporting data. It finds that violent crime peaked in the early 1990s, with 1992 having the most reports of violent crime for the decade. The passage of the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which provided billions for law enforcement and crime prevention, corresponded with declining violent crime rates throughout the remainder of the 1990s. Rates fluctuated by state and decade, influenced by factors like the introduction of crack cocaine in the 1980s and economic conditions. Overall, reports of violent crime increased dramatically from the 1960s through the early 1990s before declining for the rest of the analyzed period.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.