This document provides evaluation results for a mathematics course taught in the summer term of 2015-2016. It includes distribution of grades, course and teaching effectiveness ratings, and responses to individual evaluation questions. Key results include: - 4 students received grades between 4.50-5.09 - Course and teaching effectiveness were both rated between 4.50-5.09 (the highest category) - Satisfaction with the course and teacher received mean ratings of 4.95 and 4.73 respectively.

1. Faculty of Science - Mathematics (MATH_UG)
Course and Teaching Evaluation Distribution Report
Summer Term 2015-2016
1.00-1.49 1.50-2.09 2.10-2.69 2.70-3.29 3.30-3.89 3.90-4.49 4.50-5.09 5.10-5.69 5.70-6.00
0 0 0 0 0 0
4
0 0
Range of mean
Course Effectiveness
1.00-1.49 1.50-2.09 2.10-2.69 2.70-3.29 3.30-3.89 3.90-4.49 4.50-5.09 5.10-5.69 5.70-6.00
0 0 0 0 0 0
4
0 0
Range of mean
Teaching Effectiveness
(Q17)
Departmental Average: 4.83
Adjusted Mean: 5.05
(Q18)
Departmental Average: 4.73
Adjusted Mean: 4.99

2. Faculty of Science - Mathematics (MATH_UG)
Course and Teaching Evaluation Individual Report, Summer Term 2015-2016
97.56% (40)
a. Faculty Affiliation:
h. Grade Self-Expected
g. Time Spent on Course Outside Class (Hrs per week)
Perceived Supplementary Language Spoken
(can select more than one)
Perceived Percentage of Usage of English
f. Perceived Primary Language Spoken in Class
e. Sex
d. Course Type
c. Year of Study
b. Level
80.49% (33)19.51% (8)
97.56% (40)2.44% (1)0.00% (0)0.00% (0)0.00% (0)
Course Code: MATH3280B Introductory Probability
41Class Size: 60 68.33%
Dr SHEN ShuangCourse Title:
No. Returned:
Teacher:
Response Rate:
ART
0.00% (0)
BAS
14.63% (6) 19.51% (8) 4.88% (2) 0.00% (0) 0.00% (0) 4.88% (2)
EDU ERG LAW MED SCI SSC OTHER
4.88% (2)51.22% (21)
Other
1
4.88% (2)
2
46.34% (19) 39.02% (16) 7.32% (3) 2.44% (1) 0.00% (0)
3 4 5 ≥6
Major required
9.76% (4) 58.54% (24) 9.76% (4) 9.76% (4) 12.20% (5)
Major elective Minor Elective U Core N/A
0.00% (0)
MaleFemale
Cantonese Others
0.00% (0)0.00% (0)0.00% (0)100.00% (41)
61-70% 71-80% 81-90%51-60% 91-100%
2.44% (1)
Cantonese Others N/A
75.61% (31)0.00% (0)14.63% (6)2.44%(1)
14.63% (6) 53.66% (22) 17.07% (7) 9.76% (4) 2.44% (1)
12.0+8.1-12.04.1-8.02.1-4.00-2.0 N/A
2.44% (1)
12.20% (5)
N/A
2.44% (1)
C+ or below
7.32% (3)
B/B-
39.02% (16)
B+
17.07% (7)
A-
21.95% (9)
A
2.44% (1) 0.00% (0)
Putonghua
PutonghuaEnglish
English
Undergraduate Postgraduate
AdjustedRaw
QuartileSDMean
TotalQ1 Med. Q3 (1) (2) (3) (4) (6)(5)
Invalid
Answers
A/A- B+/B/B- C+
or below
Strongly
Agree
AgreeSlightly
Agree
Slightly
Disagre
DisagreeStrongly
Disagree
Mean by
Self-Expected grade
1 Presentation is clear
#
%
0
0.00
2
5.00
3
7.50
10
25.00
15
37.50
10
25.00
40 1
4.70 4.94 1.08 4.00 5.00 5.75
4.80 5.00 0.98 4.00 4.88 5.88
5.27 4.05 4.00
2 Examples relevant to learning
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
2
4.88
11
26.83
17
41.46
11
26.83
41
4.90 5.05 0.85 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.83 5.04 1.02 4.25 4.75 5.94
5.25 4.47 5.00
3 Teacher was enthusiastic
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
4
9.76
15
36.59
11
26.83
11
26.83
41
4.71 4.89 0.97 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.77 4.98 1.04 4.06 4.88 5.94
5.00 4.26 5.00
4 Class participation encouraged
#
%
1
2.44
3
7.32
8
19.51
9
21.95
13
31.71
7
17.07
41
4.24 4.51 1.28 3.00 4.00 5.00
4.38 4.62 1.23 3.50 4.25 5.31
4.75 3.79 5.00
5 Communication was effective
#
%
0
0.00
2
5.00
9
22.50
9
22.50
11
27.50
9
22.50
40 1
4.40 4.61 1.20 3.00 4.50 5.00
4.54 4.78 1.22 3.63 4.63 5.31
4.94 3.72 5.00
6 The course was interesting
#
%
0
0.00
1
2.44
1
2.44
13
31.71
17
41.46
9
21.95
41
4.78 4.95 0.90 4.00 5.00 5.00
4.64 4.87 1.09 4.00 4.88 5.25
5.19 4.42 5.00
7 The course was stimulating
#
%
0
0.00
1
2.44
2
4.88
12
29.27
17
41.46
9
21.95
41
4.76 4.95 0.93 4.00 5.00 5.00
4.70 4.93 1.09 4.00 5.00 5.50
5.25 4.32 5.00
8 Subject knowledge is enhanced
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
1
2.44
12
29.27
17
41.46
11
26.83
41
4.93 5.05 0.81 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.82 5.03 1.03 4.00 5.00 5.75
5.25 4.53 5.00
9 The course was well-organized
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
1
2.44
13
31.71
17
41.46
10
24.39
41
4.88 5.00 0.80 4.00 5.00 5.50
4.77 4.95 0.91 4.25 4.88 5.31
5.19 4.58 5.00
10 Clear learning outcomes
#
%
0
0.00
1
2.44
3
7.32
9
21.95
17
41.46
11
26.83
41
4.83 5.05 0.99 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.81 5.02 1.03 4.19 5.00 6.00
5.06 4.47 5.00
11 Appropriate assessment method
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
3
7.32
9
21.95
16
39.02
13
31.71
41
4.95 5.14 0.91 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.96 5.18 0.97 4.50 5.00 5.75
5.06 4.68 5.00
12 Appropriate workload amount
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
3
7.32
9
21.95
17
41.46
12
29.27
41
4.93 5.11 0.89 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.82 5.03 0.99 4.00 5.00 5.75
5.25 4.53 5.00
Amount of workload
#%
00.00Too Much
3100.00Too Little
13 Recommended readings useful
#
%
0
0.00
1
2.78
1
2.78
6
16.67
17
47.22
11
30.56
36 5
5.00 5.22 0.91 5.00 5.00 6.00
4.85 5.06 0.99 4.25 5.00 5.56
5.20 4.75 5.00
14 Content difficulty appropriate
#
%
1
2.44
0
0.00
2
4.88
11
26.83
16
39.02
11
26.83
41
4.80 5.03 1.04 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.79 5.03 1.04 4.13 5.00 5.63
4.75 4.68 5.00
Content difficulty
#%
133.33Too Difficult
266.67Too Simple
15 Supported by library resources
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
4
14.81
4
14.81
11
40.74
8
29.63
27 14
4.85 5.08 1.01 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.92 5.12 0.90 4.19 5.00 5.56
5.14 4.22 5.00
16 Supported by IT resources
#
%
0
0.00
1
3.85
3
11.54
3
11.54
11
42.31
8
30.77
26 15
4.85 5.13 1.10 4.00 5.00 6.00
4.88 5.09 0.96 4.25 5.00 5.75
5.07 4.25 5.00
17 Satisfaction with course
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
2
5.00
8
20.00
20
50.00
10
25.00
40 1
4.95 5.11 0.80 4.25 5.00 5.75
4.83 5.05 0.98 4.44 4.88 5.44
5.25 4.56 5.00
18 Satisfaction with teacher
#
%
0
0.00
0
0.00
6
15.00
9
22.50
15
37.50
10
25.00
40 1
4.73 4.92 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.75
4.73 4.99 1.15 4.25 5.00 5.50
5.13 4.28 5.00
Notes
1. 'Invalid answers' include (a) non-response and (b) selection more than one category. All other data are considered valid answers.
3. Definitions: (a) Raw Mean: mean based on all valid answers (b) Adjusted Mean: Mean with bottom 10% valid answers removed; (c) SD: Standard Deviation;
(d) Q1: 25th percentile; Med.: Median; Q3: 75th percentile; (e) #: number of respondents selecting the respective category; (f) %: percentage of # divided by number of valid answers;
(g) Mean by Expected Grade: Raw mean based on responses of students expecting the corresponding grade.
2. For each numbered question, top row (not shaded) reports Course Statistics, bottom row
4. All statistics, except adjusted means, are compiled based on valid answers.
reports Departmental/Programme/School/College Statistics.(shaded)