The document describes the rules and format for Speaktacular 2012, a public speaking competition with 3 rounds over 2 days. Round 1 involves group discussions, Round 2 is a debate competition divided into pairs, and Round 3 features individual impromptu speeches. Participants will be judged on their communication skills, content, behavior, viewpoint expression, analysis, and confidence. Winners will advance through each round until an overall champion is named.
This document outlines the details of an English debate competition being held among 16 teams from 9 high schools. It provides information on the schedule, rules, roles and scoring of the various rounds of the competition.
The competition will consist of preliminary rounds on various topics regarding traditional Indonesian food, followed by a semifinal round and final round. Teams will be judged on the content and delivery of their arguments as well as their structure and time management. Winners will receive cash prizes and medals.
The document provides information about the 33rd Annual Ohio High School Mock Trial Competition. It summarizes the goals of the mock trial program, which aims to educate students about the legal system and build skills like critical thinking. Each year, volunteer attorneys write an original case involving a constitutional issue. The case this year involves a police officer who shot a student with a toy bow and arrow. The trial will focus solely on the officer's affirmative defense of justified use of force. The document outlines the procedures, scoring guidelines, and roles for the competition.
This RFD is bad because:
- It does not provide any specific details about the arguments made by either team.
- It does not explain which arguments were most persuasive or impacted the decision.
- It does not point to any clear contradictions or weaknesses in the opposition's case.
A good RFD cites evidence from the debate to justify the decision, rather than making vague, general statements. Judges should aim to provide constructive feedback through detailed RFDs.
Presenting can be a daunting task. Learn how to command a room like a boss in 3 easy steps. Bore no more and make your next presentation soar! People will take action on what you need them to. They will love your message and be wowed by your presentation skills.
"All" You Want to know About How To Judge The Speech ContestsWei Koon GOH, MBA
District 80's workshop on "All You Want to Know About Speech Contests 101" which I talked about how to judge in a speech contest and what are the different elements in scoring.
Week 2 Into to Debating the British Parliamentary Styleabrarhaider15
This document provides an overview of British parliamentary debating. It discusses the format, which involves two sides debating a motion over several 5-minute speeches. Teams are comprised of 4 speakers who must argue for their assigned side without contradiction. Speeches follow a structured format and other teams can ask brief questions during a speech. The document outlines timing, rules around rebuttals, new arguments and team communication. It emphasizes having fun and lists upcoming debating competitions for new participants to consider.
The document describes the rules and format for Speaktacular 2012, a public speaking competition with 3 rounds over 2 days. Round 1 involves group discussions, Round 2 is a debate competition divided into pairs, and Round 3 features individual impromptu speeches. Participants will be judged on their communication skills, content, behavior, viewpoint expression, analysis, and confidence. Winners will advance through each round until an overall champion is named.
This document outlines the details of an English debate competition being held among 16 teams from 9 high schools. It provides information on the schedule, rules, roles and scoring of the various rounds of the competition.
The competition will consist of preliminary rounds on various topics regarding traditional Indonesian food, followed by a semifinal round and final round. Teams will be judged on the content and delivery of their arguments as well as their structure and time management. Winners will receive cash prizes and medals.
The document provides information about the 33rd Annual Ohio High School Mock Trial Competition. It summarizes the goals of the mock trial program, which aims to educate students about the legal system and build skills like critical thinking. Each year, volunteer attorneys write an original case involving a constitutional issue. The case this year involves a police officer who shot a student with a toy bow and arrow. The trial will focus solely on the officer's affirmative defense of justified use of force. The document outlines the procedures, scoring guidelines, and roles for the competition.
This RFD is bad because:
- It does not provide any specific details about the arguments made by either team.
- It does not explain which arguments were most persuasive or impacted the decision.
- It does not point to any clear contradictions or weaknesses in the opposition's case.
A good RFD cites evidence from the debate to justify the decision, rather than making vague, general statements. Judges should aim to provide constructive feedback through detailed RFDs.
Presenting can be a daunting task. Learn how to command a room like a boss in 3 easy steps. Bore no more and make your next presentation soar! People will take action on what you need them to. They will love your message and be wowed by your presentation skills.
"All" You Want to know About How To Judge The Speech ContestsWei Koon GOH, MBA
District 80's workshop on "All You Want to Know About Speech Contests 101" which I talked about how to judge in a speech contest and what are the different elements in scoring.
Week 2 Into to Debating the British Parliamentary Styleabrarhaider15
This document provides an overview of British parliamentary debating. It discusses the format, which involves two sides debating a motion over several 5-minute speeches. Teams are comprised of 4 speakers who must argue for their assigned side without contradiction. Speeches follow a structured format and other teams can ask brief questions during a speech. The document outlines timing, rules around rebuttals, new arguments and team communication. It emphasizes having fun and lists upcoming debating competitions for new participants to consider.
This document provides guidance for judges at a debate tournament. It explains that judges are to watch debates, score individual speakers, record the winning team, and provide feedback. It outlines the formats and styles of debates, including cross-examination and CNDF styles. It describes what judges should evaluate in their scoring, such as organization, evidence, rebuttal, delivery, and questioning. Judges are advised to remain impartial and consistent in their scoring.
FTC FIRST Summer Conference: Gearing Up Mad Interview SkillsGigi Johnson
Share our July 24, 2014 FIRST Tech Challenge webinar slides! Info: http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprograms/ftc/gear-up-with-ftc and http://firsttechchallenge.blogspot.com/2014/06/gear-up-with-ftc-inaugural-first-tech.html
Description: Team judging interviews can be a mystery for rookie teams -- and for many experienced teams and mentors as well! We'll share stories of good and challenging judging interviews and cover 5 steps to improving your team interview skills. Gigi Johnson, EdD, has both judged and coached FTC teams in the Los Angeles area and with humor and insight is glad to share ideas on gearing up your team judging interview skills.
The document outlines the training for contest judges. It covers fundamentals of judging including being fair, accurate listeners. It discusses barriers to objectivity and requirements for disqualifications. The judging criteria is explained covering speech, language, content and delivery. Guidelines for originality protests are provided. A demonstration speech contest is held where trainees judge 3 speakers. Finally, there is discussion around the results and consistency of judging.
The document is a post-conference survey that asks participants to rate various aspects of a recent conference on a scale of 1 to 4, including overall conference organization, quality of food and facilities, individual speakers, and topics. It also collects information about which speakers and topics most interested the participant, contacts made, and asks if they would recommend the conference and attend again.
Customer service simon cooper william van veenelkako38
This document discusses customer service as it relates to judges at Magic: The Gathering tournaments. It defines the customers as the players, their friends/family, and everyone at the event. Judges are expected to run events smoothly, take breaks, smile, and build friendships. The head judge and tournament organizer are most concerned with everyone having a great experience. Good customer service involves things like pushing in chairs, picking up garbage, talking to players, and handling judge calls professionally. Stories from judges' experiences help illustrate good and bad customer service.
This document provides guidance on organizing a speech contest in 4 phases:
1) Planning the contest details such as date, location, purpose, and rules
2) Recruiting facilitators and preparing forms for judges, timers, and counters
3) Verifying plans with the contest chair and chief judge and contacting contestants
4) Instructions for the chief judge and contest chair to arrive early and brief participants on the speaking order and contest rules.
This document provides training for judges in Toastmasters speech contests. It discusses the purpose of contests, contest seasons and types, judge eligibility requirements, and how to judge objectively and avoid bias. It explains the difference between judging and evaluating. The judge's guide, ballot, and procedures for handling ties and protests are also outlined. Examples of judging criteria like content, delivery, and language are given. The document concludes with rules reviews and a discussion period.
The Preliminary English Test (PET) is an exam that tests intermediate English language skills. It was first approved in the 1970s and certifies that test-takers can read, write, and speak English at a basic level. The PET exam evaluates the four language skills - reading, writing, listening, and speaking. It is internationally recognized as proof of a B1 English proficiency level and can help students in their business and academic pursuits. The exam takes 3 hours and 30 minutes to complete and assesses skills through tasks like choosing pictures to match conversations, answering questions about reading or listening passages, and short conversations between exam-takers. A passing score results in a PET certificate.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for an academic interactions class. It includes instructions for analyzing interview videos in groups and answering questions about the purpose, register, body language, questions asked, and reflections. Students are to complete analysis of 4 videos either in class or as homework by answering questions about the interview content, style, and effectiveness. The goal is to better understand interviews and work collaboratively to examine different examples.
This document provides an overview of case interviews for management consulting positions. It discusses the goals of case interviews in assessing candidates' analytical abilities, structured thinking, and fit for consulting. The typical case interview involves introductory and behavioral questions, presentation of a case study, an interactive discussion led by the candidate, and concluding questions. The document provides tips for each stage of the case interview process and common challenges candidates may face. It recommends practicing case interviews through books, online resources, workshops, and mock interviews.
This document provides guidance on preparing a memorial for a moot court competition. It outlines the typical sections included in a memorial such as the cover page, table of contents, statement of facts, issues, arguments etc. It discusses the contents and formatting requirements of each section. The document also highlights important points to remember when drafting a memorial like reading the moot proposition carefully, using proper font style and size, page numbering etc. Finally, it discusses some advantages of participating in moots like networking opportunities, confidence building and importance of teamwork.
This document provides information about an IELTS preparation book titled "220 IELTS Speaking Topics". The book contains speaking topics, sample tests, tips, and expressions to help IELTS candidates prepare for the speaking portion of the exam. It is organized into three chapters that cover the test format, common topics, sample questions, and real test examples. The goal is to expose candidates to a wide variety of topics and questions to build their speaking skills and confidence.
This document provides information about an IELTS preparation book titled "220 IELTS Speaking Topics". The book contains speaking topics, sample tests, tips, and useful expressions to help IELTS candidates prepare for the speaking portion of the exam. It is divided into three chapters - an introduction to the IELTS speaking test format, compiled topics for each part of the test, and real test samples. The book aims to improve candidates' speaking skills and confidence through exposure to various materials and an accompanying audio CD with sample tests.
SU Toast Club Evaluation and Humorous Speech ContestsSung-Jin Kim
1. The document announces a Toastmasters event featuring an evaluation speech contest and a humorous speech contest.
2. The agenda outlines the schedule of events including an opening, the two contests with masters of ceremonies, and the presentation of awards.
3. Contestant criteria and judge's guides are provided for the panel evaluation contest focusing on strengths, recommendations, techniques, and speech development.
SU Toast Chapter of Toastmasters International_Club Contests_2010GetInTheCloud
1. The document announces a fall evaluation and humorous speech contest hosted by Toastmasters International District 65 on September 28, 2010 at Syracuse University.
2. The agenda includes a panel evaluation contest with 4 panelists evaluating different aspects of a test speaker's speech, and a humorous speech contest.
3. Guidelines are provided for the panel evaluation contest, including criteria for judges to evaluate contestants on strengths analysis, recommendations, technique, and speech development.
The document provides details about the judging process for an awards competition from the perspective of a jury member. It describes the three stages of judging including generating shortlists, voting on shortlists, and voting for category winners. It notes that the jury is made up of industry experts who judge entries based on criteria like strategy, idea, execution, and results. It also offers tips for entrants on how to best present their work to the jury through entry forms, videos, and boards.
This powerpoint slides is based on the previous upload. The previous one was used in today's workshop. The new version will be used in tomorrow's workshop. The new powerpoint slides contain a few additional slides that I thought about to include but forgot. The Q&A session at the end of today's worshop made me decide to go ahead and include them. Hope you're somehow benefitting from this slideshow. Don't forget to mention me in your prayers.
This document discusses the requirements and process for judges to achieve Level 2 certification. It outlines the different judge levels from Uncertified to Level 5. It then details the expectations, pre-certification requirements, and interview items for becoming a Level 2 judge. These include requirements like number of events judged, head judging events, rules knowledge exams, and recommendations. It provides advice on getting involved in the judge community through local events, online resources, and mentoring others. The goal of Level 2 is to develop stronger rules knowledge, policy skills, and experience for larger competitive tournaments.
This document provides guidance and information for judges in Division 'D' speech contests. It outlines the role of speech contests in Toastmasters, types of contests, eligibility rules, guidelines for chief judges, contest procedures, and judging tips. Contest judges are instructed to study contest rules thoroughly, avoid bias, support contest procedures, and select winners based solely on speech performance. The document aims to help judges understand their role in ensuring fair and impartial judging.
This document provides guidance for judges and attorneys volunteering as scorers for the 2023-24 California Mock Trial competition. It includes scripts for presiding judges to use during the pretrial motion and trial portions of the competition, as well as summaries of the procedures for these sections. It also excerpts some important rules from the competition rulebook, such as those regarding team composition, the code of ethical conduct, and copyright/plagiarism. The goal is to create a positive learning experience for student participants through fair judging and scoring according to the provided criteria.
Zero to Hero: A Toastmaster Tall Tale WorkshopMatthew Ownby
Show several tools on how to generate creative story ideas for Tall Tales. Also, the basic framework for storytelling is also included. Even if you have no material or no idea how to craft a tall tale speech. This will help get started and at the very least have an outline for a great Tall Tale speech
This document provides guidance for judges at a debate tournament. It explains that judges are to watch debates, score individual speakers, record the winning team, and provide feedback. It outlines the formats and styles of debates, including cross-examination and CNDF styles. It describes what judges should evaluate in their scoring, such as organization, evidence, rebuttal, delivery, and questioning. Judges are advised to remain impartial and consistent in their scoring.
FTC FIRST Summer Conference: Gearing Up Mad Interview SkillsGigi Johnson
Share our July 24, 2014 FIRST Tech Challenge webinar slides! Info: http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprograms/ftc/gear-up-with-ftc and http://firsttechchallenge.blogspot.com/2014/06/gear-up-with-ftc-inaugural-first-tech.html
Description: Team judging interviews can be a mystery for rookie teams -- and for many experienced teams and mentors as well! We'll share stories of good and challenging judging interviews and cover 5 steps to improving your team interview skills. Gigi Johnson, EdD, has both judged and coached FTC teams in the Los Angeles area and with humor and insight is glad to share ideas on gearing up your team judging interview skills.
The document outlines the training for contest judges. It covers fundamentals of judging including being fair, accurate listeners. It discusses barriers to objectivity and requirements for disqualifications. The judging criteria is explained covering speech, language, content and delivery. Guidelines for originality protests are provided. A demonstration speech contest is held where trainees judge 3 speakers. Finally, there is discussion around the results and consistency of judging.
The document is a post-conference survey that asks participants to rate various aspects of a recent conference on a scale of 1 to 4, including overall conference organization, quality of food and facilities, individual speakers, and topics. It also collects information about which speakers and topics most interested the participant, contacts made, and asks if they would recommend the conference and attend again.
Customer service simon cooper william van veenelkako38
This document discusses customer service as it relates to judges at Magic: The Gathering tournaments. It defines the customers as the players, their friends/family, and everyone at the event. Judges are expected to run events smoothly, take breaks, smile, and build friendships. The head judge and tournament organizer are most concerned with everyone having a great experience. Good customer service involves things like pushing in chairs, picking up garbage, talking to players, and handling judge calls professionally. Stories from judges' experiences help illustrate good and bad customer service.
This document provides guidance on organizing a speech contest in 4 phases:
1) Planning the contest details such as date, location, purpose, and rules
2) Recruiting facilitators and preparing forms for judges, timers, and counters
3) Verifying plans with the contest chair and chief judge and contacting contestants
4) Instructions for the chief judge and contest chair to arrive early and brief participants on the speaking order and contest rules.
This document provides training for judges in Toastmasters speech contests. It discusses the purpose of contests, contest seasons and types, judge eligibility requirements, and how to judge objectively and avoid bias. It explains the difference between judging and evaluating. The judge's guide, ballot, and procedures for handling ties and protests are also outlined. Examples of judging criteria like content, delivery, and language are given. The document concludes with rules reviews and a discussion period.
The Preliminary English Test (PET) is an exam that tests intermediate English language skills. It was first approved in the 1970s and certifies that test-takers can read, write, and speak English at a basic level. The PET exam evaluates the four language skills - reading, writing, listening, and speaking. It is internationally recognized as proof of a B1 English proficiency level and can help students in their business and academic pursuits. The exam takes 3 hours and 30 minutes to complete and assesses skills through tasks like choosing pictures to match conversations, answering questions about reading or listening passages, and short conversations between exam-takers. A passing score results in a PET certificate.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for an academic interactions class. It includes instructions for analyzing interview videos in groups and answering questions about the purpose, register, body language, questions asked, and reflections. Students are to complete analysis of 4 videos either in class or as homework by answering questions about the interview content, style, and effectiveness. The goal is to better understand interviews and work collaboratively to examine different examples.
This document provides an overview of case interviews for management consulting positions. It discusses the goals of case interviews in assessing candidates' analytical abilities, structured thinking, and fit for consulting. The typical case interview involves introductory and behavioral questions, presentation of a case study, an interactive discussion led by the candidate, and concluding questions. The document provides tips for each stage of the case interview process and common challenges candidates may face. It recommends practicing case interviews through books, online resources, workshops, and mock interviews.
This document provides guidance on preparing a memorial for a moot court competition. It outlines the typical sections included in a memorial such as the cover page, table of contents, statement of facts, issues, arguments etc. It discusses the contents and formatting requirements of each section. The document also highlights important points to remember when drafting a memorial like reading the moot proposition carefully, using proper font style and size, page numbering etc. Finally, it discusses some advantages of participating in moots like networking opportunities, confidence building and importance of teamwork.
This document provides information about an IELTS preparation book titled "220 IELTS Speaking Topics". The book contains speaking topics, sample tests, tips, and expressions to help IELTS candidates prepare for the speaking portion of the exam. It is organized into three chapters that cover the test format, common topics, sample questions, and real test examples. The goal is to expose candidates to a wide variety of topics and questions to build their speaking skills and confidence.
This document provides information about an IELTS preparation book titled "220 IELTS Speaking Topics". The book contains speaking topics, sample tests, tips, and useful expressions to help IELTS candidates prepare for the speaking portion of the exam. It is divided into three chapters - an introduction to the IELTS speaking test format, compiled topics for each part of the test, and real test samples. The book aims to improve candidates' speaking skills and confidence through exposure to various materials and an accompanying audio CD with sample tests.
SU Toast Club Evaluation and Humorous Speech ContestsSung-Jin Kim
1. The document announces a Toastmasters event featuring an evaluation speech contest and a humorous speech contest.
2. The agenda outlines the schedule of events including an opening, the two contests with masters of ceremonies, and the presentation of awards.
3. Contestant criteria and judge's guides are provided for the panel evaluation contest focusing on strengths, recommendations, techniques, and speech development.
SU Toast Chapter of Toastmasters International_Club Contests_2010GetInTheCloud
1. The document announces a fall evaluation and humorous speech contest hosted by Toastmasters International District 65 on September 28, 2010 at Syracuse University.
2. The agenda includes a panel evaluation contest with 4 panelists evaluating different aspects of a test speaker's speech, and a humorous speech contest.
3. Guidelines are provided for the panel evaluation contest, including criteria for judges to evaluate contestants on strengths analysis, recommendations, technique, and speech development.
The document provides details about the judging process for an awards competition from the perspective of a jury member. It describes the three stages of judging including generating shortlists, voting on shortlists, and voting for category winners. It notes that the jury is made up of industry experts who judge entries based on criteria like strategy, idea, execution, and results. It also offers tips for entrants on how to best present their work to the jury through entry forms, videos, and boards.
This powerpoint slides is based on the previous upload. The previous one was used in today's workshop. The new version will be used in tomorrow's workshop. The new powerpoint slides contain a few additional slides that I thought about to include but forgot. The Q&A session at the end of today's worshop made me decide to go ahead and include them. Hope you're somehow benefitting from this slideshow. Don't forget to mention me in your prayers.
This document discusses the requirements and process for judges to achieve Level 2 certification. It outlines the different judge levels from Uncertified to Level 5. It then details the expectations, pre-certification requirements, and interview items for becoming a Level 2 judge. These include requirements like number of events judged, head judging events, rules knowledge exams, and recommendations. It provides advice on getting involved in the judge community through local events, online resources, and mentoring others. The goal of Level 2 is to develop stronger rules knowledge, policy skills, and experience for larger competitive tournaments.
This document provides guidance and information for judges in Division 'D' speech contests. It outlines the role of speech contests in Toastmasters, types of contests, eligibility rules, guidelines for chief judges, contest procedures, and judging tips. Contest judges are instructed to study contest rules thoroughly, avoid bias, support contest procedures, and select winners based solely on speech performance. The document aims to help judges understand their role in ensuring fair and impartial judging.
This document provides guidance for judges and attorneys volunteering as scorers for the 2023-24 California Mock Trial competition. It includes scripts for presiding judges to use during the pretrial motion and trial portions of the competition, as well as summaries of the procedures for these sections. It also excerpts some important rules from the competition rulebook, such as those regarding team composition, the code of ethical conduct, and copyright/plagiarism. The goal is to create a positive learning experience for student participants through fair judging and scoring according to the provided criteria.
Similar to COT#2 Toastmasters Judges Training (20)
Zero to Hero: A Toastmaster Tall Tale WorkshopMatthew Ownby
Show several tools on how to generate creative story ideas for Tall Tales. Also, the basic framework for storytelling is also included. Even if you have no material or no idea how to craft a tall tale speech. This will help get started and at the very least have an outline for a great Tall Tale speech
Getting Comfortable with General EvaluationsMatthew Ownby
If you are not sure how to deliver a General Evaluation during a Toastmaster meeting, this will help you figure out what to think about and how to go about evaluating the meeting.
Jane is giving a presentation on distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks to various audiences. The document discusses what a DDoS attack is, how it overloads servers with multiple compromised systems flooding them with traffic, preventing new connections. It then shows Jane tailoring her presentation on DDoS attacks to different audiences like IT staff, financial professionals, and executives by simplifying and adjusting the level of detail.
This document outlines the agenda and process for a Round Table Dialog training session. It includes instructions on icebreakers, topics for discussion, guidelines for respectful dialogue, and a timetable. The training utilizes a "talking object" where only the person holding the object may speak, to ensure all voices are heard. Participants discuss various questions about motivating members and club operations. Sessions are organized by role and club to share experiences. The goal is for officers to learn from each other and identify action items to improve their clubs.
The document discusses the Distinguished Club Program (DCP), which provides clubs with a framework to objectively measure whether they are fulfilling the Toastmasters mission of supporting members' communication and leadership development. The DCP establishes 10 criteria clubs must meet at different achievement levels, including having a minimum number of members, completing projects, and retaining officers. These criteria and numbers are meant to be relatively realistic goals that clubs can work towards. The document encourages clubs to identify obstacles preventing them from meeting DCP goals, and to collaboratively make plans to overcome challenges as a team.
This document discusses assertiveness and its importance in evaluations. It defines assertiveness as thinking in terms of win-win outcomes, respecting oneself and others, trusting one's abilities, and taking a proactive approach. In contrast, passive people lack self-respect and trust, while aggressive people lack respect for others. The document provides tips for giving assertive evaluations, such as starting and ending with respect, being constructive rather than critical, and confidently providing advice and praise. It includes case studies to demonstrate assertive evaluations in different situations.
The document discusses theories of humor and laughter from various philosophers and comedians. It explores how laughter is not inherent to jokes themselves, but can be a response to stress, social pressures, or surprise. The document also mentions laughter yoga and its health benefits, as well as examples of humor from Southern comedians Jeff Foxworthy and Bill Engvall.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
26. What info do you send?
Time, Date & Venue for Judge Briefing
"
1)
Judge’s Guide and Ballot
"
2)
Judge’s Certification of Eligibility and
Code of Ethics
"
3) Links to the TI`s e-learning for Contest Judges
27. 4 Main Tasks
✔️Assign Judges
□
✔️Send Email to Judges
□
□ Prepare for the Judge Briefing
□ Determine the Winners
28. 4 Main Tasks
✔️Assign Judges
□
✔️Send Email to Judges
□
□ Prepare for the Judge Briefing
□ Determine the Winners
32. What documents do you bring for
the Judge Briefing?
1) Judge`s
Guide and Ballot
"
2)
Time
Sheet
"
3)
Ballot
Sheet (Tally Counter)
"
4)
Tiebreaking
Judge Sheet
"
5)
Judge’s Certification of Eligibility and
Code of Ethics (Just in Case)
33. What documents do you bring for
the Judge Briefing?
Just for yourself
1) Judge`s
Briefing Script
"
2)
Contest
Rule Book
53. Simulation
1. Let's judge three
contestants' speeches "
2. Use the Judge’s Sheet"
3. Wait 1 minute between the
speeches for judging, and
take 2 minutes after the last
speaker for judging "
4. Tallying after the last
speaker is finished
55. Discussion
1. Turn over your ballot
2. Give the reasons why you
ranked the speakers without
mentioning the points you
assigned.
3. Have someone note it down.
Make it short and simple
4. Repeat for each member.
5. Turn the ballot up.
6. See if the points you gave
match what you said.
7. If they are different consider
why they are different.
56. Let’s do some math!
1. Add the following numbers in your head (Do
NOT use pen, paper, pencil or a calculator.
"
2. Start with 1,000. Add 40. Add 1,000. Add 30. Add
1,000. Add 20. Add 1,000. Add 10.
"
3. What is the total?