These slides are presented as complementary to the Toastmasters International Speech Contest Judges Training, which seems to be without PowerPoint slides as at 2014-03-09.
http://www.toastmasters.org/ses2judge
"All" You Want to know About How To Judge The Speech ContestsWei Koon GOH, MBA
District 80's workshop on "All You Want to Know About Speech Contests 101" which I talked about how to judge in a speech contest and what are the different elements in scoring.
These slides are presented as complementary to the Toastmasters International Speech Contest Judges Training, which seems to be without PowerPoint slides as at 2014-03-09.
http://www.toastmasters.org/ses2judge
"All" You Want to know About How To Judge The Speech ContestsWei Koon GOH, MBA
District 80's workshop on "All You Want to Know About Speech Contests 101" which I talked about how to judge in a speech contest and what are the different elements in scoring.
This set of slides can be presented at TLIs and Club officer trainings to encourage Toastmasters members to participate in district new club building activities.
“Seeing is believing” is an idiom first recorded in 1639 that means "only physical or concrete evidence is convincing". Can you truly believe what you see in a photograph? Is a picture worth a thousand words?
In this presentation, I discussed three ways a person can be manipulated through images and why we should always keep an open mind.
This set of slides is intended for Toastmasters as an introduction to a group exercise of generating club leads.
The purpose of this short presentation is to encourage district officers & members to form new Toastmasters club. The slides serve as the opening / intro to set tone for an exercise to 'flush out' any ideas people have: organizations, schools, churches, and towns which have potential for new clubs.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
2. Chief Judge Duties
Coordinate with Contest Chair for contest
activities and personnel
Prepare contest material
Select contest officials and administrators
Brief contest officials and administrators
Oversee contest judging and ballot counting
Present contest results
2
3. Contest Roles
Contest Chair / Contest Master(s)
Contestants
Chief Judge
Judges (At least 5 at Club / Area, at least 7 at division,
as many as you can if possible)
Tie-Breaking Judge
Timers (X2)
Ballot Counters (X3)
Sergeant-At-Arms (at least 3, depending on the venue)
Audience
3
4. Abbreviated Timeline
4
Activity Weeks to
Contest
Confirm contests venue / time 8-12
Recruit & select judges 4-6
Select ballot counters, timers, SAAs 2-4
Study contest rules and planning documents 4
Confirm contestants and judges eligibilities 1-2
Send reminders to contest officials & confirm participation 1
Plan contest officials briefing & prepare forms & certificate 1
Select tie breaking judge, conduct contest briefing At the contest
Oversee judging, timers, ballot counting, and present result At the contest
Report results to the next level officials, dispose paperwork After contest
Send Thank You notes to contest officials After contest
5. Judges Eligibility
Be a member in good standing
Area, Division, District level contests
Be a member in good standing for minimum of 6 months
Completed a minimum of 6 speech projects in Competent
Communication
All judges shall remain anonymous, when practical
Judges are not eligible to compete in this contest cycle for this type
of contest.
Judges are not from contestants' clubs or all contestants' clubs are
equally represented
Preferred Judge List
5
6. Contest Rule Book Versions
This is Year 2015, we use 2015 Rule Book
Changes from 2014 were marked with ‘Spade’.
Contestants may not use digital or other devices during the
contest to gain an unfair advantage
.., a charter member of a club chartered less than one year
before the club contest is permitted to compete without having
completed this requirement (6 speeches), the club must have
been officially chartered before the area contest
Rule Book 2014 has significant amount of changes from 2013. Burn
your old rule books and never use them again
Homework: Find those changes (from 2013 to 2014)
6
7. Contestant Eligibility
1)Be a member in good standing from club in good standing
2)Completed a minimum of 6 speech projects in Competent
Communication before the contest (International Speech
Contest only)
3)Contestant(s) from newly chartered clubs are exempt from
Rule #2 (explained page 6 )
4)District & international officials & candidate are ineligible to
compete (see Rulebook 2015 for the complete list)
5)Check contestant eligibility-standing with Toastmasters
International mailto:speechcontests@toastmasters.org
7
8. Contest Packages / Forms
Download from TI for free
https://www.toastmasters.org/Shop/Contests/Speech-Contest-Kits
Package Contents for Judging
Judge's Ballot (Each contest has its own ballot)
Judge's Certification of Eligibility and Code of Ethics
Speaker's Certification of Eligibility and Originality
Tie-Breaking Judge Ballot
Ballot Counter's Tally Sheet
Time Sheet
Winner Notification Sheet
Certificates
Note: Red Font indicates multiple copies needed.
8
9. Before Contest
Check-in contest officials. Find replacement(s)
or substitute(s) if necessary
Brief contest officials – Judges / timers /
counters / SAAs
Collect and check eligibility forms (from
judges and contestants)
Detailed briefing list
http://www.tmdistrictone.org/ContestDocs/JudgesBriefing.pdf
http://www.toastmasters83.org/-speech-contests/contest-aids.html
http://www.d25toastmasters.org/resources/contest/ChiefJudgesBriefing.pdf
9
10. During the Contest
Collect the time record sheet
Collect tiebreaking judge’s ballot.
Resolve any protests.
Oversee the counting of ballots.
Provide a list showing placement of all contestants
to the contest chair.
Notify contestants of any disqualifications
Remind contest chair to announce
disqualification(s) without naming before
announcing winners 10
11. After the Contest
Send Notification of Winner, Eligibility Sheets, and
Profiles to the next level
Destroy all ballots, time record sheets and counter
tally sheets
Send Thank-You notes / emails to contest officials
11
12. Protests
Limited to Judges and Contestants only, prior to
announcement of results
Bases of Protest
– Eligibility
– Originality
– Timing Errors (contestants only)
All decisions of the voting judges and qualifying
judges are final (once results announced, that's it)
12
13. Speech Originality
All speakers must certify originality using the Speaker’s
Certification of Eligibility and Originality form (item 1183)
International, Humorous and Tall Tales
25% or less may be devoted to quoting, paraphrasing, or
referencing another person’s content. Any quoted,
paraphrased, or referenced material must be so
identified during the speech presentation.
13
14. Handling of Originality Protest
Call all voting judges to a private room and explain
the situation
Contestant in question is given an opportunity to
respond to the accusation
Contestant will be disqualified if majority of the
voting judges voted 'Yes' to disqualification
Notify the contestant, in private, the judges decision
Notify contest chair there is an originality
disqualification but not name the contestant
14
16. Ballot Counting & Tie
Breaking
16
1st
Place – Snow
2nd
Place – Cinda
3rd
Place – Mickey
(We only announce the first three places if there are 5 contestants or
more. Announce 1st
/ 2nd
places if 4 or fewer.)
4th
Place – Ariel
5th
Place – Pluto
6th
Place - Donald
Did you get the order right? If not, go to Rule Book Page 12 (d)
17. The tied contestant who received the
highest ranking on the tiebreaking
judge’s ballot will gain the
contested place, and any other tied
contestants will be ranked in order
behind that contestant.
Rulebook, Page 12 (d)
19. Case Study
1. A contestant protests the results after the contest
2. A contestant protests the Table Topics question
3. Contest Chair announced the results incorrectly
4. Incomplete Judge's ballot
5. Disruptions, equipment failure, & noises
6. Not enough judges or counters
7. A contestant did not pay dues
8. Extra ballot from audience
19
20. Thank You!
Acknowledgements of host and helpers
Please leave your forms with me or on the
table
Your name will be added to the list of
preferred Judges
Good luck!
Have fun!
20
Editor's Notes
Welcome to District 83’s speech contest judges training seminar
Introduce self
Handouts – include your judges packet (contest forms (judge and tie-breaker), contest rule book, envelope
In red items are chief judges duties. Green items are contest chair and chief judge both have to manage those people. You need to review contestants’ eligibility form and may have check with TI if they qualify to compete. SAAs need to bring in the next contestant for Table Topic & Evaluation contests.
Slides will be provided to you electronically by email
Club in good standing means at least 8 members paid dues to TI and contestant is one of them.
Rule book page xxx (check)
This checking process in TI may take up to 2 weeks. Sometimes you can ask club for their membership roster show their dues status from club central.
If any portion of the ballot is NOT COMPLETE or is UNREADABLE, the chief judge will discard the ballot.
This has happened in District 83 in the past. We do not like discarding ballots!
If any portion of the ballot is NOT COMPLETE or is UNREADABLE, the chief judge will discard the ballot.
This has happened in District 83 in the past. We do not like discarding ballots!
If any portion of the ballot is NOT COMPLETE or is UNREADABLE, the chief judge will discard the ballot.
This has happened in District 83 in the past. We do not like discarding ballots!
Scenarios:
There is a speech in which 25% is devoted to quoting another person or published work, even thought the quote is properly attributed to its source.
A speech in which part of the material is taken from another source and is not credited.
A speech that has been taken entirely from another source in which he may or may not have been credited.
This is my preferred method; although, I pre-fold the columns as part of my preparation.
This is my preferred method; although, I pre-fold the columns as part of my preparation.
This is my preferred method; although, I pre-fold the columns as part of my preparation.
This is my preferred method; although, I pre-fold the columns as part of my preparation.