1. Role of corporate governance in
value enhancement of corporates
Presented by :-
Abhinav Khanna
CMBA5
2. Introduction to corporate Governance
System by which management of business entity directs & controls the activities in the best
interest of stake holders.
Corporate Governance bears following policies
Trusteeship
Transparency
Empowerment & Accountability
Control
Ethical Corporate Behaviour
Corporate Governance is generally understood as the framework of rules, relationships, systems
and processes within and by which authority is exercised and controlled in corporations.
3. Definitions of corporate governance
“Corporate Governance is about promoting corporate fairness, transparency
and accountability”. James D. Wolfensohn (Ninth President World Bank)
“(It is) the system by which companies are directed and controlled”. Cadbury
Committee, U.K
“Corporate Governance is the acceptance by management of the inalienable
rights of shareholders as the true owners of the corporation and of their own
role as trustees on behalf of the shareholders. It is about commitment to
values, about ethical business conduct and about making a distinction
between personal and corporate funds in the management of a company.”
Report of N.R. Narayana Murthy Committee on Corporate Governance
constituted by SEBI (2003)
“Corporate Governance is the application of best management practices,
compliance of law in true letter and spirit and adherence to ethical standards
for effective management and distribution of wealth and discharge of social
responsibility for sustainable development of all stakeholders.”
Institute of Company Secretaries of India
4. Corporate Governance &
Corporate Management
Governance is different from management.
Company is run by management but run through governance.
Governance can be used in any area
NGO/NPO
Central/state Government
Partnership firm
Society, etc.
5. Historical Perspective of Corporate
Governance
Principals of governance given by chankya (known as mahatama, equivalent
to PM).
Principals are :-
Raksha (Protection)
Vriddhi (Enhancement)
Palana (Maintenance)
Yogakshema (Safeguard)
8. List of few of Corporate Scandals
Scandals What Happened How they did it
Waste management (1998) Reported $1.7 billion in fake earnings. The company falsely increased the
depreciation time length of
property, plant and equipment in
balance sheet.
Enron Scandal (2001) Shareholders lost $74 billion, thousands
of employees lost their retirement
accounts and jobs.
Kept huge debts out of debt.
Worldcom Scandal(2002) Inflated Assets by as much as $11 billion
leading to $180 billion in losses to
investors.
Underreported line cost by
capitalizing rather than expensing
and inflating revenues.
Tyco scandal (2002) CEO & CFO stole $150 billion and
inflated income by $500 million.
Siphoned money through
unapproved loans and fraudulent
stock sales.
Satyam Scandal (2009) Falsely boosted revenue by $1.5 billion. Falsified revenue , margins and
cash balance.
9. Need for Corporate Governance
Corporate Performance
Enhanced Investor Trust
Combating Corruption
Easy Finance From Institutions
Enhancing Enterprise Valuation
Reduced Risk of Corporate Crisis and Scandals
Accountability
10. Fundamental principles of corporate
governance
Ethical and disciplined corporate behaviour
Independent and considered judgment
Parity between accountability and responsibility
Transparency and effective and adequate disclosures.
11. Outline Of Good corporate Governance
Supervisory Board/ Governing Board/ Board of Governance
Special Purpose Board Committees
Internal Control system and Risk Management Framework
Strong Internal Audit system
Whistle Blower Mechanism
Code of Conduct for all employees
Disclosure of Information
12. Development of Corporate Governance
in USA(Extract)
Years & Various
Act/Reports
Developments
1977 The Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act
Provides for specific provisions regarding establishment, maintenance and
review of systems of internal control.
1979 US Securities
Exchange Commission
Prescribed mandatory reporting on internal financial controls
1985 Treadway
commission
Emphasised the need of putting in place a proper control environment,
desirability of constituting independent boards and its committees and
objective internal audit function.
1992 COSO issued Internal
Control – Integrated
Framework.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) issued Internal Control – Integrated Framework. It is a framework "to
help businesses and other entities assess and enhance their internal control
systems”
2002 Sarbanes – Oxley Act The Act made fundamental changes in virtually every aspect of corporate
governance in general and auditor independence, conflict of interests,
corporate responsibility, enhanced financial disclosures and severe penalties
for wilful default by managers and auditors, in particular.
13. Development of Corporate Governance
in UK(Extract)
Years & Various
Act/Reports
Developments
1992, The Financial
Aspects on Corporate
Governance
To focus on the control and reporting functions of boards, and on the role of
auditors.
1995 Greenbury Report To make recommendations on Directors’ Remuneration
1998 Hampel Report The Hampel Committee was established to review and revise the earlier
recommendations of the Cadbury and Greenbury Committees. An important
development was in the area of accountability and audit.
2008 Combined Code on
Corporate Governance
The Combined Code on Corporate Governance sets out standards of good
practice in relation to issues such as board composition and development,
remuneration, accountability and audit and relations with shareholders.
2009 Walker Review of
Corporate Governance of
UK Banking Industry
The principal focus of this Review has been on banks, but many of the issues
arising, and associated conclusions and recommendations, are relevant – if in a
lesser degree – for other major financial institutions such as life assurance
companies.
14. Development of Corporate Governance
in India (Extract)
Years & Various
Act/Reports
Developments
1998, Desirable Corporate
Governance : A code
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) the first institution initiative in Indian
Industry. The objective was to develop and promote a code for Corporate
Governance to be adopted and followed by Indian companies, whether in the
Private Sector, the Public Sector, Banks or Financial Institutions, all of which
are corporate entities.
2000, Kumar Mangalam
Birla Committee
Set up by SEBI under chairmanship of kumar Mangalam Birla to build and raise
corporate governance , led to inclusion of Clause 49 in listing agreement on
Audit Committee
2002 Naresh Chandra
Committee Report
Naresh Chandra Committee was appointed to examine and recommend inter
alia amendments to the law involving the auditor-client relationships and the
role of independent directors
2003, N.R. Narayana
Murthy Committee
SEBI felt requirement need to bring Amendments in Clause 49 in listing
agreement, SEBI therefore constituted a Committee under the Chairmanship of
Shri N.R. Narayana Murthy, for reviewing implementation of the corporate
governance code by listed companies and for issue of revised clause 49 based
on its recommendations.
15. Findings of Various Acts/Reports on
Corporate Governance
The Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee – Important instrument to protect
investor intereset
N.R. Narayana Murthy Committee – Shareholders as true owners and role of
management as trustees
Cadburry Committee – Review on Board performance
Sarbanes – Oxley Act, 2002 – Auditor independence, conflict of interests,
financial disclosures, severe penalties for willful default by managers and
auditors in particular.
The Institute of Company Secretary Of India – Best management practice to
ethical practice, distribution of wealth, discharge of social responsibility
towards stakeholders.