Constructing Tomorrow’s Infrastructure
Bob Prieto
September 14, 2015
The Global Forum on Urban and Regional Resilience
Next Generation of SMART Infrastructure
Infrastructure Gap
AV20030137001.ppt2
Framing the Problem
 Project prioritization methodologies are weak
 Two out of three large projects “fail”
 Construction productivity unchanged
 Barriers to improved delivery persist
 Time is not valued
 Assets are not well or consistently maintained
 Life cycle performance not a guiding principle
 Resilience to respond to a changing future lacking
 Post disaster environment not provided for
 Systemic innovation absent
Financing the Problem
Funding and Financing confused
Tax exempt debt preference limits capital
Disparity of covenants
Tax policy does not reward longest term ownership
Federal tools good but not sufficient
Secondary markets immature
Post disaster funding requires building back better
Fixing the Problem
Robust standard on infrastructure prioritization
– Outcomes focused vision
– Consistent methodology
• Doing the right things
• Doing enough of the right things
• Doing right things right
– Classes of factors to be considered
– Portfolio approach
• Maintenance
• Productivity
• Growth
• Innovation
Fixing the Problem
Strategic Management
– Strengthened Foundations
• Owner’s readiness not just project readiness
• Optimism bias addressed by reference class forecasting
• Realistic risk registers, models and modeling
 White space risk; fat tail distributions; assumption
migration; constraint coupling
• Recognize, address and measure complexity
– New theory of large complex projects
• Semi-permeable boundary; emergent outcomes
• Focus on Flows – transformational, influencing, induced
• Engage, not manage - Sentries, scouts, ambassadors
– Decouple by minimizing precedences
– Contingency management
Fixing the Problem
Build for the lifecycle
– BODX – Expanded Basis of Design (BOD)
• CBOD – design to build
• O&MBOD – design to operate, maintain and replace
– Life cycle performance based standards
– Manufacture vs construct
• Standardize, optimize, automate, build lean
 Nuts & bolts; 3rd Gen modules; knowledge assemblies
– Optionality as a resilience strategy
Fixing the Problem
Remove the handcuffs
– Facilitate contractual innovation
• Federal $$$ = No preclusions by law or regulation
– Facilitate means, methods, materials innovations
• SAFETY Act equivalent
Value time
– Include escalation and cost of schedule risk in all
estimates and budgets
• Include economic value of time – revenues, costs
• Life cycle view
– One stop permitting process for critical infrastructure
• Limit period for filing lawsuits
– Consolidate procurement steps
– Recognize the true cost of disruption
Fixing the Problem
Post disaster construction framework changed
– Labor, materials, equipment
– Logistics
– Damaged construction infrastructure
– Extensive temporary works
– Overwhelmed regulatory and administrative agencies
– Changed contracting frameworks
– Good Samaritan challenges
– Bonding requirements
– Evolving codes and standards
Fixing the Problem
Encourage industry consolidation and global leadership
– Horizontal and vertical
• Competition of supply chains
• Essential for systemic innovation
– Supportive international tax policy
• Personal and business
Fixing the Problem
New financial construct
– Eliminate tax exempt infrastructure financing
• Opens broader capital markets (pension funds)
– Reward long term infrastructure investment
• Reduced capital gains on 15 year or longer investments
– Create a subordinated debt infrastructure bank with public
and private shareholders
– Require life cycle maintenance and debt service coverage
ratio covenants
• Funding mechanisms must be pre-established to support
Fixing the Problem
Post disaster requires improving resilience of urban
environments
– Government funding and insurance typically focused on
in kind restoration
– Pre-existing long term plans required to provide context
and minimize delayed decision making
– Improvements must carry a life cycle covenant
Fixing the Problem
 New infrastructure paradigm
– Consolidate
• Multi-infrastructure framework required
 ROW as an increasingly valuable asset
– Prioritize
• Security/ Resilience
• Discretionary
• System Enhancements
• State of Good Repair
– Manage
• Enterprise or portfolio management approaches
– Improve
• Incentivize R&D and provide liability protection for initial
deployments of innovations
– Monetize
• What is the value of the nation’s infrastructure assets?
 Trillion $$$ example
• Create secondary financial markets
Resilience
AV20030137001.ppt21

Constructing tomorrow’s infrastructure

  • 1.
    Constructing Tomorrow’s Infrastructure BobPrieto September 14, 2015 The Global Forum on Urban and Regional Resilience Next Generation of SMART Infrastructure
  • 2.
  • 4.
    Framing the Problem Project prioritization methodologies are weak  Two out of three large projects “fail”  Construction productivity unchanged  Barriers to improved delivery persist  Time is not valued  Assets are not well or consistently maintained  Life cycle performance not a guiding principle  Resilience to respond to a changing future lacking  Post disaster environment not provided for  Systemic innovation absent
  • 6.
    Financing the Problem Fundingand Financing confused Tax exempt debt preference limits capital Disparity of covenants Tax policy does not reward longest term ownership Federal tools good but not sufficient Secondary markets immature Post disaster funding requires building back better
  • 8.
    Fixing the Problem Robuststandard on infrastructure prioritization – Outcomes focused vision – Consistent methodology • Doing the right things • Doing enough of the right things • Doing right things right – Classes of factors to be considered – Portfolio approach • Maintenance • Productivity • Growth • Innovation
  • 9.
    Fixing the Problem StrategicManagement – Strengthened Foundations • Owner’s readiness not just project readiness • Optimism bias addressed by reference class forecasting • Realistic risk registers, models and modeling  White space risk; fat tail distributions; assumption migration; constraint coupling • Recognize, address and measure complexity – New theory of large complex projects • Semi-permeable boundary; emergent outcomes • Focus on Flows – transformational, influencing, induced • Engage, not manage - Sentries, scouts, ambassadors – Decouple by minimizing precedences – Contingency management
  • 11.
    Fixing the Problem Buildfor the lifecycle – BODX – Expanded Basis of Design (BOD) • CBOD – design to build • O&MBOD – design to operate, maintain and replace – Life cycle performance based standards – Manufacture vs construct • Standardize, optimize, automate, build lean  Nuts & bolts; 3rd Gen modules; knowledge assemblies – Optionality as a resilience strategy
  • 12.
    Fixing the Problem Removethe handcuffs – Facilitate contractual innovation • Federal $$$ = No preclusions by law or regulation – Facilitate means, methods, materials innovations • SAFETY Act equivalent Value time – Include escalation and cost of schedule risk in all estimates and budgets • Include economic value of time – revenues, costs • Life cycle view – One stop permitting process for critical infrastructure • Limit period for filing lawsuits – Consolidate procurement steps – Recognize the true cost of disruption
  • 13.
    Fixing the Problem Postdisaster construction framework changed – Labor, materials, equipment – Logistics – Damaged construction infrastructure – Extensive temporary works – Overwhelmed regulatory and administrative agencies – Changed contracting frameworks – Good Samaritan challenges – Bonding requirements – Evolving codes and standards
  • 15.
    Fixing the Problem Encourageindustry consolidation and global leadership – Horizontal and vertical • Competition of supply chains • Essential for systemic innovation – Supportive international tax policy • Personal and business
  • 16.
    Fixing the Problem Newfinancial construct – Eliminate tax exempt infrastructure financing • Opens broader capital markets (pension funds) – Reward long term infrastructure investment • Reduced capital gains on 15 year or longer investments – Create a subordinated debt infrastructure bank with public and private shareholders – Require life cycle maintenance and debt service coverage ratio covenants • Funding mechanisms must be pre-established to support
  • 18.
    Fixing the Problem Postdisaster requires improving resilience of urban environments – Government funding and insurance typically focused on in kind restoration – Pre-existing long term plans required to provide context and minimize delayed decision making – Improvements must carry a life cycle covenant
  • 19.
    Fixing the Problem New infrastructure paradigm – Consolidate • Multi-infrastructure framework required  ROW as an increasingly valuable asset – Prioritize • Security/ Resilience • Discretionary • System Enhancements • State of Good Repair – Manage • Enterprise or portfolio management approaches – Improve • Incentivize R&D and provide liability protection for initial deployments of innovations – Monetize • What is the value of the nation’s infrastructure assets?  Trillion $$$ example • Create secondary financial markets
  • 21.