Conflict In Medical Practice
PRESENTED BY:
1. Hoicha Rangjang( Roll no 1)
2. Pooja Kumari (Roll no 2)
DEFINITION
 Disagreement within oneself or between people that
cause harm or have the potential to cause harm.
 Disagreement can be of ideas, perspectives, priorities,
preferences, beliefs, values and goals.
CLASSIFICATION
Intrapersonal Interpersonal
Intragroup Intergroup
Conflict
 Intrapersonal: tales place within an individual; it is
psychological involving the individual’s thoughts, values,
principles and emotions.
 Interpersonal: between two individuals due to
incompatible choices and opinion.
 Intragroup: occurs among individuals within team
members.
 Intergroup: due to misunderstanding among different
teams within an organization.
Conflict Management
 Collaboration:
 working together by integrating ideas set out by multiple people so
as to find a creative solution acceptable to everyone.
 Common grounds for agreement and common interests are
pursued.
 Most time consuming strategy.
 Negotiation:
 Adjusting with each other’s opinions and ideas,and thinking of a solution
where some points of both the parties can be entertained.
 The parties attempt to strike some sort of a bargain so as to minimize losses
and maximize gains.
 Accomodation:
 Means giving up of one’s own ideas and thoughts so that the other party
achieve its desired outcome.
 Accession is unlikely to result in a successful strategy in the long term.
 Avoidance:
 Involves no declaration or statement for one of the parties to the other
and no cooperation from the other party is sought or gained.
 The ideas suggested by both the parties are rejected and a third person
is involved who takes a decision without favoring any of the parties.
 A mediator in the healthcare setting would be either the HOD, CEO of
the hospital or some high level administrator.
 This technique may lead to postponing the conflict but may make
matters worse.
 Domination and Intimidation:
 The use of authority to impose one’s will over another.
 This requires the greatest amount of assertiveness, and may backfire as
some negotiators are by nature submissive individuals who may sound
inauthentic when trying to dominate another
Process of Negotiation
 1. Preparation
 2. Exploration of shared interests
 3. Enlarging of shared interests
 4. Enlightened interests
 5. Aligned interests
Preparation
 Set realistic goals and be flexible
 Revisit the circumstances behind the conflict
 Schedule specific start and finish times for the meetings
 Find a neutral ground for holding the meeting
 Minimize distractions
 Ensure breakout spaces for all
Exploration of shared interests
 Each party shares what they hope to achieve from negotiation and satisfy
them .
Conducted in a nonadversarial manner .
Listen carefully to what is being expressed .
All the relevant issues should be laid on the table and both the parties should
acknowledge .
Enlarging of shared interests
 Highlight points of agreement and disagreement
 Define common ground for agreement e.g good patient care often the
points of agreement outweighed the points of disagreement
 Delineate disagreement e.g unresolved differences
 identify and try to expand on small agreements
 Avoid communication freezers e.g negative personals comments
 Develop and agree on a work plan for working on issues . Clarigy rules and
tasks for participants.
Enlightened interests
 The parties are encouraged to come up with creative solutions to the
remaining points of disagreement .
 A zone of no obligation is set up and creativity can flourish without either
side needing to commit to anything .
Aligned interests
 With multiple solutions available , each party can now debate what
combination of solutions results in maximal recognizable gain for the parties
 Whatever disagreement remains after this process can be deferred until a
future round of negotiations .
 The negotiation over solutions will require each party to make some
concessions .
THANK YOU

Conflict In Medical Practice mbbs presentation

  • 1.
    Conflict In MedicalPractice PRESENTED BY: 1. Hoicha Rangjang( Roll no 1) 2. Pooja Kumari (Roll no 2)
  • 2.
    DEFINITION  Disagreement withinoneself or between people that cause harm or have the potential to cause harm.  Disagreement can be of ideas, perspectives, priorities, preferences, beliefs, values and goals.
  • 3.
  • 4.
     Intrapersonal: talesplace within an individual; it is psychological involving the individual’s thoughts, values, principles and emotions.  Interpersonal: between two individuals due to incompatible choices and opinion.  Intragroup: occurs among individuals within team members.  Intergroup: due to misunderstanding among different teams within an organization.
  • 5.
    Conflict Management  Collaboration: working together by integrating ideas set out by multiple people so as to find a creative solution acceptable to everyone.  Common grounds for agreement and common interests are pursued.  Most time consuming strategy.
  • 6.
     Negotiation:  Adjustingwith each other’s opinions and ideas,and thinking of a solution where some points of both the parties can be entertained.  The parties attempt to strike some sort of a bargain so as to minimize losses and maximize gains.  Accomodation:  Means giving up of one’s own ideas and thoughts so that the other party achieve its desired outcome.  Accession is unlikely to result in a successful strategy in the long term.
  • 7.
     Avoidance:  Involvesno declaration or statement for one of the parties to the other and no cooperation from the other party is sought or gained.  The ideas suggested by both the parties are rejected and a third person is involved who takes a decision without favoring any of the parties.  A mediator in the healthcare setting would be either the HOD, CEO of the hospital or some high level administrator.  This technique may lead to postponing the conflict but may make matters worse.
  • 8.
     Domination andIntimidation:  The use of authority to impose one’s will over another.  This requires the greatest amount of assertiveness, and may backfire as some negotiators are by nature submissive individuals who may sound inauthentic when trying to dominate another
  • 9.
    Process of Negotiation 1. Preparation  2. Exploration of shared interests  3. Enlarging of shared interests  4. Enlightened interests  5. Aligned interests
  • 10.
    Preparation  Set realisticgoals and be flexible  Revisit the circumstances behind the conflict  Schedule specific start and finish times for the meetings  Find a neutral ground for holding the meeting  Minimize distractions  Ensure breakout spaces for all
  • 11.
    Exploration of sharedinterests  Each party shares what they hope to achieve from negotiation and satisfy them . Conducted in a nonadversarial manner . Listen carefully to what is being expressed . All the relevant issues should be laid on the table and both the parties should acknowledge .
  • 12.
    Enlarging of sharedinterests  Highlight points of agreement and disagreement  Define common ground for agreement e.g good patient care often the points of agreement outweighed the points of disagreement  Delineate disagreement e.g unresolved differences  identify and try to expand on small agreements  Avoid communication freezers e.g negative personals comments  Develop and agree on a work plan for working on issues . Clarigy rules and tasks for participants.
  • 13.
    Enlightened interests  Theparties are encouraged to come up with creative solutions to the remaining points of disagreement .  A zone of no obligation is set up and creativity can flourish without either side needing to commit to anything .
  • 14.
    Aligned interests  Withmultiple solutions available , each party can now debate what combination of solutions results in maximal recognizable gain for the parties  Whatever disagreement remains after this process can be deferred until a future round of negotiations .  The negotiation over solutions will require each party to make some concessions .
  • 15.