The first of the four part webinar series on Agile Compliance presented by Confident Governance Chairman Bhavesh Bhagat and Crossland Advisors Founder Jay Crossland. The webinar talks about the significant challenges faced by Compliance officers worldwide.
BEST ✨ Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ✔️ 9871031762 ✔️ Escorts Service...
ConfidentNow Webinar Series : Top 3 Challenges Faced By Global Chief Compliance Officers
1. ConfidentNow
Webinar Series
Top 3 Challenges faced by
global Chief Compliance
Officers
View the full recording here :
https://Bit.ly/cgwebinar_top3compliance
2. Speakers
Bhavesh C. Bhagat
CGEIT, CISM, MBA, BE
Chairman,
Confident Governance
Jay Crossland
CISA, MBA
CEO and Founder,
Crossland Advisors, Inc.
/bhaveshbhagat
/jay-crossland-1a08333
@bbhagat
bb@confidentgovernance.com
Jay.Crossland@crosslandadvisors.com
3. Schedule for Subsequent Webinars in ConfidentNow
Webinar Series on Compliance
22nd September 2016, Thursday
Redefining Compliance processes : Conventional Tools Vs Agile Tools
Regn : https://www.anymeeting.com/AccountManager/RegEv.aspx?PIID=EC57DF82844B3E
10th November 2016, Thursday
Leveraging Agility in Compliance through Dynamic Reporting &
Effective ERM
Regn : https://www.anymeeting.com/AccountManager/RegEv.aspx?PIID=EC57DF82844A39
8th December 2016, Thursday
Efficiency in Compliance : Charting out Robust & Innovative
Strategies for the dynamic Compliance Officers
Regn : https://www.anymeeting.com/AccountManager/RegEv.aspx?PIID=EC57DF82844A3A
4. Key Takeaway
In this first of our four-part Webinar series on Compliance, you will
hear insights from Industry Experts on the Top 3 Challenges faced
by Compliance Officers worldwide
5. Agenda
• Challenge 1 : Rapid Velocity of Change
• Challenge 2 : Lack of Transparency
• Challenge 3 : Shifting Focus To Keep Up
With Evolving Risks
7. Challenge 1 : Rapid Velocity of Change
• The regulatory
environment is continually
changing at Federal, State
and Local levels
• Organizations are required
to have Compliance and
Governance Policies that
are always up-to-date
• The rapid pace of change in
Technology
• Complex Employee
demographics
9. As Per Compliance Week’s Recent
“Compliance Trends Survey”
What Methodology Does Your Organization
Follow For Compliance Processes ?
76
18
6 Centralized
De-centralized
No real Compliance
Function
10. Challenge 2 : Lack of Transparency
• Lack of visibility &
continuity between
various Businesses,
Departments &
Locations
• Inadequate or
Inconsistent reporting
• Compliance data is
often difficult to
obtain because it
comes from
incongruent parts of
the organization
11. As Per A Recent PwC Survey on Energy and
Utilities Compliance Functions
Who takes care of the Compliance Program In
your Organization ?
34
66
Dedicated Compliance
group
Compliance Committee
members with Multiple
roles in the Organization
12. Challenge 3 : Shifting Focus To Keep Up With
Changing Risks
13. Challenge 3 : Shifting Focus To Keep Up With
Evolving Risks
• The New Normal has changed
• However the focus of Compliance Officers has not shifted
• Failing to optimise & decipher this level of risk creates a major challenge
15. Schedule for Subsequent Webinars in ConfidentNow
Webinar Series on Compliance
22nd September 2016, Thursday
Redefining Compliance processes : Conventional Tools Vs Agile Tools
Regn : https://www.anymeeting.com/AccountManager/RegEv.aspx?PIID=EC57DF82844B3E
10th November 2016, Thursday
Leveraging Agility in Compliance through Dynamic Reporting &
Effective ERM
Regn : https://www.anymeeting.com/AccountManager/RegEv.aspx?PIID=EC57DF82844A39
8th December 2016, Thursday
Efficiency in Compliance : Charting out Robust & Innovative
Strategies for the dynamic Compliance Officers
Regn : https://www.anymeeting.com/AccountManager/RegEv.aspx?PIID=EC57DF82844A3A
16. Contact Us
Bhavesh C. Bhagat
CGEIT, CISM, MBA, BE
Chairman,
Confident Governance
Jay Crossland
CISA, MBA
CEO and Founder,
Crossland Advisors, Inc.
/bhaveshbhagat
/jay-crossland-1a08333
@bbhagat
bb@confidentgovernance.com
Jay.Crossland@crosslandadvisors.com
Editor's Notes
Rapid change in Workforce
Per Brookings, 75% of worlds working population by 2025 would be Millennials. So it’s a generational evolution for Businesses globally
While 75% of new workforce will be Millennials, almost 100% of all of them will be Technology dependent. Audit and Compliance processes need to adjust
Work for Millennials is not life, it is just one thing amongst their main pursuit which is in general idealist well being in life
Generations across human history have not had special skills, rather they are shaped by special societal circumstances
As an Entrepreneur and Technology Angel Investor, we monitor business cycles before general business becomes aware of those, Compliance professionals need to do the same. They need to be a step ahead – alternative is Obsolescence.
Rapid change in Technology
By 2020 a household with 2 members would have 50 connected devices per OECD
Each new device is like stereo transmitter but its 24x7. Do companies understand risk of constant outbound bits ?
In the realm of IoT, Robotics and AI, IT is irrelevant. Technology is inbuilt in every piece of a process
To overcome this Challenge, the “Tone at the Top” is very important.
Discuss example of the conversation with the President of a Fast Growing Oil and Energy Company.
He said “Compliance is exciting and we want to make it our Competitive edge. To achieve this we are making all our Processes efficient and effective and also choosing the right people for these processes”.
In many cases, regulations are having a significant impact on how business operates; some of this is helpful and some is not.
Process documentation, such as policies and procedures often fails to keep pace with change but regulators expect policies to be up-to-date at any given point in time. As a best practice, policies and procedures should be reviewed and updated as part of any new process roll-out or process change; just build it into the change process or methodology.
Ever changing technology is also stressing the financial and human resources of many organizations. Strategic organizational decisions must include the impact on and from regulations and technology. While technology can sometimes help with the regulatory burden, it comes at a cost. Also, technology should not be seen as the solution to regulatory challenges but instead a tool to help achieve regulatory compliance. When Sarbanes Oxley was first introduced, I saw far too many organizations rush to purchase a tool. They quickly realized that the tool was just that and they still had significant effort to design and develop controls that could be tracked with the tool. In some cases the tool purchased did not fit the SOX compliance process for that organization and had to be scrapped.
Employee demographics…
According to Compliance Week’s “Compliance Trends Survey 2013,” 76% of the nearly 200 respondents said they employ a centralized structure for the compliance department, where one CCO oversees business-unit leaders. Another 18% indicated using a decentralized structure of local compliance officers reporting to local business unit leaders.
Being rigorous and proactive in the application of transparency is vital for true compliance
Transparency can give companies a competitive advantage, both when extraordinary circumstances arise and in daily activities.
Companies must be in close compliance with legal frameworks and regulations, or risk running into big problems. The good news is that transparency can make adhering to policies and codes much easier, reducing the amount of time it takes to manage the often complex process.
Almost every organization is seeing compliance requirements grow exponentially. From financial reporting to HIPAA to Dodd Frank, depending on the industry, compliance may seem to be one of the primary services of an organization. In fact, some of my clients in health care related fields often joke that compliance is rapidly becoming their largest service that they can’t sell.
Because of compliance demands and lean resources, many organizations have delegated dealing with compliance across the various businesses, departments and locations. This has resulted in compliance becoming a part-time job for many across the organization. Often, the legal department may be responsible for overall compliance. Few organizations want to spend money to fully staff a comprehensive compliance group. We are also seeing Internal Audit getting more involved in compliance monitoring.
Completely delegating compliance efforts results in not knowing the full impact of compliance, inadequate or inconsistent reporting and not really knowing if all compliance requirements are being met. There may also be overlaps in efforts, unknown dependencies that are not being considered or remediation happening in a vacuum. Other negative concerns from a decentralized compliance approach are:
Risk is not fully incorporated
Compliance methods are not comprehensive or are too simplistic
Compliance efforts are not regularly scheduled or monitored
Compliance testing is not formalized and not linked to risks
Compliance testing is inconsistent
No shared or mature tools
The key take-away here is that compliance should be ingrained in the culture of the organization with a common message being disseminated throughout. This is effectively done through a centralized group responsible for all compliance in an organization. While it may seem cost efficient to fully delegate compliance efforts, this fragmented approach may actually be using more resources than would be needed by a fully staffed compliance group. But the real risk is the adequacy of addressing compliance: is it an after thought or "check the box" exercise, or is it part of every strategic decision.
Pwc Survey : Profile of energy and utilities compliance functions
According to the survey, 68% of energy and utility respondents said they have a CCO/HoC in place. Further breakdown indicates that only 34% of CCOs/HoCs in the energy and utilities sector are dedicated solely to compliance, whereas 66% of them have multiple responsibilities or hold multiple roles in their organizations. Establishing a standalone CCO/HoC position may become an increasing priority in the energy and utilities sector, considering that industryspecific regulations dominate as the number one concern throughout the industry.
Nature of Risks has changed as Business Processes have changed
How the workforce is using Technology has changed (Discuss BYOD)
There can no longer be any business which is blase about its attitude to risk. From terrorism to natural disasters, from a debilitating global financial crisis to geo-political turmoil, risk continues as a fact of human life.
And at a "micro" level, modern organisations deal constantly with a minefield of risks, ranging from "digital disruption" to mismanagement of their own forecasting and cash flow decision-making, to compliance breaches and fraud, product performance, customer and client consolidation, credit defaults, regulatory, tax and market changes, human resources risk, product risk and ethical risk, including that potentially coming from well up the supply chain.
The "velocity" of risk and the interplay of a global marketplace effectively constitutes new varieties of risk, It comes back to thinking about risk in both the upside and the downside, because you need to take on board risk to be in business.That's what business is, it's consciously taking on-board risk, and evolving and changing, and turning risks into opportunities. Technology is no different – it is an opportunity, and with it comes a threat. By being in business you're taking on a certain amount of risk: it's failing to optimise and fully understanding this level of risk that lets companies down.