By John Ward, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia
Presented at the Mekong Forum on Water, Food and Energy Phnom Penh, Cambodia December 7-9, 2011 Session 6a: The role of research: How does research influence the ways in which water, food and energy development decisions are made?
The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) jointly hosted the International Conference on Climate Change and Food Security (ICCCFS) November 6-8, 2011 in Beijing, China. This conference provided a forum for leading international scientists and young researchers to present their latest research findings, exchange their research ideas, and share their experiences in the field of climate change and food security. The event included technical sessions, poster sessions, and social events. The conference results and recommendations were presented at the global climate talks in Durban, South Africa during an official side event on December 1.
Dr. Totti Könnölä from Impetu Solutions waas invited to give a keynote speech on 'Opening Horizons: What kind of new approaches are available?' in the COST Foresight on Future Demand for Forest-based Products and Services: Dissemination Conference on September 13, 2011, in Sekocin Stary (Near Warsaw)/Poland.
Presentation given by MDC at ICES annual science conference, on the need for ICES to includemore social and economice information in its outputs, and highlight good examples
Evidence-Based Forestry: Approaches and Results in the Asia-Pacific RegionCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered at the third Asia-Pacific Forestry Week 2016, in Clark Freeport Zone, Philippines.
The five sub-thematic streams at APFW 2016 included:
Pathways to prosperity: Future trade and markets
Tackling climate change: challenges and opportunities
Serving society: forestry and people
New institutions, new governance
Our green future: green investment and growing our natural assets
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Closing remarks for the forum by Dr Kim Geheb, Mekong Basin Leader, CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
More Related Content
Similar to Competing facts and contested values: navigating science and policy interactions
The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) jointly hosted the International Conference on Climate Change and Food Security (ICCCFS) November 6-8, 2011 in Beijing, China. This conference provided a forum for leading international scientists and young researchers to present their latest research findings, exchange their research ideas, and share their experiences in the field of climate change and food security. The event included technical sessions, poster sessions, and social events. The conference results and recommendations were presented at the global climate talks in Durban, South Africa during an official side event on December 1.
Dr. Totti Könnölä from Impetu Solutions waas invited to give a keynote speech on 'Opening Horizons: What kind of new approaches are available?' in the COST Foresight on Future Demand for Forest-based Products and Services: Dissemination Conference on September 13, 2011, in Sekocin Stary (Near Warsaw)/Poland.
Presentation given by MDC at ICES annual science conference, on the need for ICES to includemore social and economice information in its outputs, and highlight good examples
Evidence-Based Forestry: Approaches and Results in the Asia-Pacific RegionCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered at the third Asia-Pacific Forestry Week 2016, in Clark Freeport Zone, Philippines.
The five sub-thematic streams at APFW 2016 included:
Pathways to prosperity: Future trade and markets
Tackling climate change: challenges and opportunities
Serving society: forestry and people
New institutions, new governance
Our green future: green investment and growing our natural assets
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Closing remarks for the forum by Dr Kim Geheb, Mekong Basin Leader, CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
Session 20 comparing the nexus along the mekong gangaCPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy 2013. Presentation from Session 20: Is the Nexus Secure … and for Whom?: Unpacking Nexus Discourses on Food, Water, and Energy Security in South and Southeast Asia
Sustainability tools in hydropower development & operationsCPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
Efforts to apply to rsat in mekong tributary sub basins under the mrc-ish pro...CPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
Advancing sustainability in the mekong region role of assessment tools and st...CPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Generating a custom Ruby SDK for your web service or Rails API using Smithyg2nightmarescribd
Have you ever wanted a Ruby client API to communicate with your web service? Smithy is a protocol-agnostic language for defining services and SDKs. Smithy Ruby is an implementation of Smithy that generates a Ruby SDK using a Smithy model. In this talk, we will explore Smithy and Smithy Ruby to learn how to generate custom feature-rich SDKs that can communicate with any web service, such as a Rails JSON API.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !KatiaHIMEUR1
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Competing facts and contested values: navigating science and policy interactions
1. Competing facts and contested values:
navigating science and policy interactions
Dr John Ward
Mekong Forum: water food and energy
Phnom Penh December 2011
2. “Policy has to do with man’s problems with coping with his future…
policy brings to statement what is judged to be possible, desirable
and meaningful for the human enterprise. In this sense policy is
the nexus of fact, value and ultimate meaning in which scientific,
ethical and theological-philosophical reflections meet.” (Winter
1966)
Hume asserts that under standard systems of logic, you cannot
derive an “ought” statement (i.e. values or the answer to a
normative question) from a series of “is” statements or facts
“The word “value” occurs in economic writing with high frequency,
the frequency of meanings being about as great as the frequency
of occurrence” (Boulding 1956)
CSIRO.
3. Key points:
1. Natural resource management (NRM) policy represents an
amalgam of facts, values and norms that guide current actions
into a future desired state
2. The decision arena is characterised by social, political and
factual uncertainty combined with contested values
3. There is a lack of consensus about what constitutes “values”
4. The linear model of science assumes that science advice
(facts) precedes and compels political decisions.
5. In the context of NRM, reducing factual uncertainty does not
translate as reduced social or policy uncertainty
6. Because contested values are central to the process of
decision making, not contested facts
7. Introduce a systematic framework to assist scientists and policy
makers in their choice of engagement
CSIRO.
4. Murray Darling Basin Plan 2010
• Central and most controversial decision was to establish an
agreed level of river system modification: how much water to
leave for the environment and how much to extract for irrigation?
• Competing interests argued that science is on “our” side and
proposed arguments that undermined the science credibility of the
opposing view.
Businesses employing >1
Total population
• Substantiated science and facts wereperson to be necessary
and seen
sufficient to the decision 2008 % process. 2008 %
2004 making 2004
change change
• Policy decisions were more about value propositions of various
Greater
58,687 61,014 +4% 2,298 2,766 +20%
water interests: subject to debate, negotiation and argument.
Shepparton
Griffith 24,534 25,278 +3% 1,182 1,377 +16%
Source ABS (2010) National Regional Profile, 28/04/10
CSIRO.
6. Criteria for determining the role of science in
policy and politics (Pielke 2007)
Is the decision context
characterised by both values
consensus and low uncertainty?
YES NO
Reduce
Connected
the scope
to policy?
of choice?
YES NO YES NO
Science arbiter Pure scientist Issue Advocate Honest Broker
By uncertainty we mean that in particular circumstances, more than
one outcome is consistent with expectations.
CSIRO.
7. Four roles of science in policy engagement
• The Pure Scientist - seeks to focus only on facts and has no
interaction with the decision maker.
• The Science Arbiter - answers specific factual questions posed
by the decision maker.
• The Issue Advocate - seeks to reduce the scope of choice
available to the decision maker.
• The Honest Broker of Policy Options - seeks to expand, or at
least clarify, the scope of choice available to the decision
maker.
CSIRO.
8. Which type of science policy engagement?
Leader,CSIRO. Evidence Freedecision models IASC 2008
Follower of based Rider (December 2007) www.climateinstitute.org.au
9. State contingent policy analysis
Biophysical
system System stimulation:
Policies and actions New system states:
Undesirable,
Behavioural system maladaptive or
Climate, and
connected pathogenic with
aquifers high social cost
Governance system
Exogenous
cultural influence Set of System
trajectories
Economic Which one???
Geo-politics, system
Dynamic system New System states:
New Policy Objectives
characteristics: eg Desirable, high
New science social benefit and
Changing Infrastructure reflects policy
Macro economics
environmental attitudes Governance: objectives
(carbon tax), New opportunities
external technologies and values Livelihoods
Changing attitudes to Land use change
Exogenous and equity or development
endogenous stimuli or
stressors
Diagnostics: Framing the problem: Prognostics:
Pure scientist and science arbiter Issue Advocate Honest Broker
CSIRO. Evidence based decision models IASC 2008
10. CSIRO Ecosystem Science
Dr John Ward
j.ward@csiro.au
Web: www.csiro.au
Thank you!
Contact Us
Phone: 1300 363 400 or +61 3 9545 2176
CSIRO. Exploring Mekong Region Futures
Email: enquiries@csiro.au Web: www.csiro.au
Page 10
11. The policy science conundrum
Politization of science
Replaces legitimate political
debate and negotiation
Potential of policy paralysis
(waiting for science)
Politician
Advocate Scientist
CSIRO.
Editor's Notes
Winter astutely observes that public policy generally is an amalgam of facts, values and norms that guide current actions into a future desired state. Policy is a decision or a commitment to particular course of action and the rules by which those actions will be realised. Hume That is facts alone cannot compel a particular policy decision on water management, despite frequently cited claims that facts instantiate particular actions in political debates involving scientific inputThe lack of consensus about the nature and status of ‘values’ has led to substantial misunderstandings and miscommunications, threatening effective policy initiatives and community acceptance of water, food and energy policy and practice. The many views expressed at this forum illustrates the diverse and contested nature of values surrounding water, food and energy security and the importance of a full consideration of all parties’ values in policy and planning. Parties to natural resourceconflict and contestation invariably rely on claims to scientific facts and truth to support their positions and interests. It cannot be that facts and truth support all parties involved in any conflict. The interpretation or misinterpretation of “Facts’ reflect particular value orientations and dispositions. My argument today in considering the role of research in decisions about water, food and energy policy is that contested values, not uncertain ‘facts’, underlie these conflicts.
The central message of the presentation is that we have choices in how science and experts relate to decision makers. These choices shape our ability to use expert advice well in particular situations, and to assist in wise decisions but also to shape the legitimacy, authority, and durability of expertise itself.First let scientists get the facts straight, the linear models says, then require politicians to implement them.
Water plans are needed to negotiate, mediate, and constrain all the relevant facts, values, opinions, advocacies, and ethics, according to the performance criteria of efficiency, equity, and sustainability. Developing water plans and the process of water reform are thus clearly political, involving negotiation, bargaining, and compromise in the pursuit of desired goals and the avoidance of undesired ones.This conflation of facts and values has ‘‘encouraged the mapping of established interests from across the political spectrum onto science,’’ such that competing interests use ‘‘science as a proxy for political battle over these interests’’ Rather than arguing about the values at stake, parties to the controversy argue about the science The MDB example, is dominated by competing Issue Advocates who all assume that the key question is whether existing scientific knowledge is certain enough to compel political action. They are all ‘‘waging a political battle through science’’
Relational values are symbolic, objective representations of physical properties or characteristics that occur independently of a particular observer. Examples include mathematical notation, the value of a parameter or variable such as the gravitational constant; the value of the length of the Mekong; the value of flow velocities; the value of turbidity or biologically available oxygen. They are subject to measurement error but are generally not contested in water value mediations. Functional values represent biological and physical relationships that continue to exist and function regardless of human observation: e.g. the value of fish or bird habitat, the value of nutrient cycling or the value of riparian vegetation for stream bank stabilisation. Facts are neutral; values are evaluative, with regard to a specified goal or standard related to a future desired state (e.g., effectiveness, quality, merit, social welfare, cultural value, fish spawning, agricultural productivity)Held values are generally abstract conceptual ideas, desirable modes of conduct, end states of existence, or principles that people hold as important and guide personal action and behaviours (Brown, 1994, Lockwood 1999). Honesty, forgiveness, loyalty, aesthetic sensitivity, courage, frugality and generosity are examples of held values. Held values and value orientations represent the disposition or basis for preference relationships, observed as behaviour or actions and mediated through ascribed or preference valuesAscribed value represents the preference or relative meritof one object, activity or concept compared to another object, activity or concept. Importantly, value is not a direct characteristic of the object, but an expression of the importance of the concept, activity or object in relation to other concepts, activities or objects in a given context.
In the context of contested values and factual uncertainty: These represent value disputes that cannot be resolved by reducing relational and functional factual uncertainty
Pure scientist provide objective answers to technical questions. Such contexts are rare in contemporary politics, they may appear when policymakers are able to isolate narrow, technical questions from largerpolitical issues. Situations where a consensus on values avoid a flood related disaster—so that reducingscientific uncertainties leads directly to a legitimate decision.When scientists in contexts of political and scientific consensus do consider specific policy options, they adopt the role of Science Arbiter. Science Arbiters avoid entanglement in normative debates, but they provide detailed answers to policymakers’ specific questions.In contexts of contested values and factual uncertainty scientists face the question of whether to try to expand or reduce the range of policy options on the table. If they seek to reduce the range of options, they become Issue Advocates who align themselves with a particular political agenda or interest group. Explicit and implicit and declarationThis conflation of decision contexts ‘‘encourages the mapping of established interests from across the political spectrum onto science,’’ such that competing interests use ‘‘science as a proxy for political battle over these interests’’ Rather than arguing about the values at stake, parties to the controversy argue about the science The MDB example, is dominated by competing Issue Advocates who all assume that the key question is whether existing scientific knowledge is certain enough to compel political action. They are ‘‘waging a political battle through science’’If scientists seek to expand the range of options, in contrast, they become Honest Brokers of Policy Alternatives who clarify existing policy options and identify new options. Honest Brokers explicitly integrate stakeholder concerns with available scientific knowledge.
AdvocateFilters science knowledge. Science is seen as impartial and sufficient to compel a particular policy action opponents do the sameBoth appeal to science to resolve political debate as long as it meets a specific social, political, environmental or economic preference. Scientist Research budget to generate knowledge and accepts mandate to generate solutionsPoliticianAvoid non-election: cannot satisfy all voters preferencesDeflect the onus of resolution to science via research funding to provide not only knowledge but also answers