By: Renia Singleton
December 11, 2012
   The director :Thomas Carter
   Writers: Mark Schwahn & John Gatins
   PG-13
   Drama/Film
   Samuel L. Jackson — Coach Ken Carter
   Rob Brown — Kenyon Stone
   Robert Ri'chard — Damien Carter
   Rick Gonzalez — Timo Cruz
   Antwon Tanner — Worm
   Channing Tatum — Jason Lyle
   The Richmond High Basketball team was
    undefeated when the Coach decided to
    bench the entire team because of the players
    grades. The controversy began because of
    the coaches decision which angered the
    parents, students, staff, principal, and also
    the town. But the coach stuck by his word
    and lock the gym down.
   “Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our
    deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure.
    It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us.
    You playing small does not serve the world. There is
    nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other
    people won’t feel insecure around you. We are all
    meant to shine as children do. It’s not just in some of
    us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights
    shine, we unconsciously give other people permission
    to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear,
    our presence automatically liberates others”.
   Many children can relate to this movie
    because it happens everyday in poverty
    areas. Parents use their child as a ticket out of
    the ghetto and if they have talent such as
    basketball or football their main focus is the
    sport and not the child's education.
   For me I this is my favorite movie because I
    can relate to this movie. I had a high school
    basketball coach that didn’t let us play if our
    grades weren’t up to her standards. Growing
    up kids in my neighborhood didn’t want to
    become doctors or police officers they
    wanted to be basketball and football stars.
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_Cvz_Bf
    ue4
   IMDb, . N.p.. Web. 4 Dec 2012.
   Coach Carter Dvd
   CHECKLIST FOR PLAGIARISM
   1) (√) I have not handed in this assignment for any other class.
   2) (√) If I reused any information from other papers I have written for other classes, I clearly
    explain that in the paper.
   3) (√) If I used any passages word for word, I put quotations around those words, or used
    indentation and citation within the text.
   4) (√) I have not padded the bibliography. I have used all sources cited in the bibliography in
    the text of the paper.
   5) (√) I have cited in the bibliography only the pages I personally read.
   6) (√) I have used direct quotations only in cases where it could not be stated in another way.
    I cited the source within the paper and in the bibliography.
   7) (√ ) I did not so over-use direct quotations that the paper lacks interpretation or originality.
   8) (√) I checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have been fully transparent about the research
    and ideas used in my paper.

   Name: Renia Singleton Date: 12/11/12
   1. (√) An introductory paragraph clearly introduces the subject. The topic statement is evident within the
    paragraph. The position taken is clear. If the position is unclear, put a question mark in the margin.

   2. (√) The next two paragraphs have a single or main claim. Note each claim in the margin in a 3-4 word
    phrase. If you can’t identify the claim, put a question mark in the margin. If two or more claims exist, and
    tend to diverge from a coherent thought, put a question mark in the margin.

   3. (√) The same thing holds for the next two paragraphs on the opposite side of the issue.

   4. (√) The four paragraphs above all focus on the issue at hand; they do not wander off into irrelevant
    territory. If any paragraph wanders, put a question mark in the margin

   5. (√) The sixth paragraph weighs the conflicting claims from the four paragraphs above and arrives at a
    conclusion. Why some evidence is more convincing than other evidence is explained. The ensuing
    conclusion is clearly stated. Circle it. If you can’t find the conclusion, put a question mark in the margin.

   6. (√) The final paragraph returns to what was stated in the first paragraph and, in light of the evidence
    presented and weighed above, convincingly rephrases the position statement. If the conclusion expected by
    the assignment is to be finessed, justifying statements for the variance must appear here and flow-from the
    explanation in the sixth paragraph of your paper.
   7. (√) Is each claim in paragraphs 2-5 supported by evidence? Are there any naked claims supported only
    by variations of "I believe...”? If so, put a big X in the margin beside that paragraph.
   8. (√) Is each claim backed up by a reference? If a claim stands naked of supporting evidence or argument,
    put a big X in the margin.
   9. (√) Does the paper do more than simply but gloriously restate the question? Examine the case study and
    cross out all ideas that appear in both the case study and in your paper. What remains-uncrossed out is your
    analysis. It should constitute the majority of your paper. If it doesn't, you haven’t done an analysis.
   10. (√) A sentence lacks either a subject or a verb; a sentence does not begin with a capital letter or end
    with a period (citations in parentheses go ahead of periods, not behind them).
   I l. (√ ) A sentence begins with a relative pronoun such as Which, Who, That, Where, and When.
   12. (√) A pronoun lacks a clear antecedent; that is, a word such as it, he, she, or they does not have an
    obvious link to a noun (especially noticeable if a sentence begins with it, he, she, or they).
   13. (√ ) A pronoun or verb fails to agree with its antecedent in number; that is, a single person or agency is
    referred to as they, or a plural subject is given a singular verb (such as, "members of the school
    board....gives their vote...").
   14. (√ ) A sentence runs-on or uses a comma to splice independent ideas together; that is, complex ideas
    are not split into two sentences but are linked, often by a comma, into an overly long, wandering sentence.

Coach carter 2

  • 1.
  • 2.
    The director :Thomas Carter  Writers: Mark Schwahn & John Gatins  PG-13  Drama/Film
  • 3.
    Samuel L. Jackson — Coach Ken Carter  Rob Brown — Kenyon Stone  Robert Ri'chard — Damien Carter  Rick Gonzalez — Timo Cruz  Antwon Tanner — Worm  Channing Tatum — Jason Lyle
  • 4.
    The Richmond High Basketball team was undefeated when the Coach decided to bench the entire team because of the players grades. The controversy began because of the coaches decision which angered the parents, students, staff, principal, and also the town. But the coach stuck by his word and lock the gym down.
  • 5.
    “Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. You playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It’s not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others”.
  • 6.
    Many children can relate to this movie because it happens everyday in poverty areas. Parents use their child as a ticket out of the ghetto and if they have talent such as basketball or football their main focus is the sport and not the child's education.
  • 7.
    For me I this is my favorite movie because I can relate to this movie. I had a high school basketball coach that didn’t let us play if our grades weren’t up to her standards. Growing up kids in my neighborhood didn’t want to become doctors or police officers they wanted to be basketball and football stars.
  • 8.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_Cvz_Bf ue4
  • 9.
    IMDb, . N.p.. Web. 4 Dec 2012.  Coach Carter Dvd
  • 10.
    CHECKLIST FOR PLAGIARISM  1) (√) I have not handed in this assignment for any other class.  2) (√) If I reused any information from other papers I have written for other classes, I clearly explain that in the paper.  3) (√) If I used any passages word for word, I put quotations around those words, or used indentation and citation within the text.  4) (√) I have not padded the bibliography. I have used all sources cited in the bibliography in the text of the paper.  5) (√) I have cited in the bibliography only the pages I personally read.  6) (√) I have used direct quotations only in cases where it could not be stated in another way. I cited the source within the paper and in the bibliography.  7) (√ ) I did not so over-use direct quotations that the paper lacks interpretation or originality.  8) (√) I checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have been fully transparent about the research and ideas used in my paper.  Name: Renia Singleton Date: 12/11/12
  • 11.
    1. (√) An introductory paragraph clearly introduces the subject. The topic statement is evident within the paragraph. The position taken is clear. If the position is unclear, put a question mark in the margin.  2. (√) The next two paragraphs have a single or main claim. Note each claim in the margin in a 3-4 word phrase. If you can’t identify the claim, put a question mark in the margin. If two or more claims exist, and tend to diverge from a coherent thought, put a question mark in the margin.  3. (√) The same thing holds for the next two paragraphs on the opposite side of the issue.  4. (√) The four paragraphs above all focus on the issue at hand; they do not wander off into irrelevant territory. If any paragraph wanders, put a question mark in the margin  5. (√) The sixth paragraph weighs the conflicting claims from the four paragraphs above and arrives at a conclusion. Why some evidence is more convincing than other evidence is explained. The ensuing conclusion is clearly stated. Circle it. If you can’t find the conclusion, put a question mark in the margin.  6. (√) The final paragraph returns to what was stated in the first paragraph and, in light of the evidence presented and weighed above, convincingly rephrases the position statement. If the conclusion expected by the assignment is to be finessed, justifying statements for the variance must appear here and flow-from the explanation in the sixth paragraph of your paper.
  • 12.
    7. (√) Is each claim in paragraphs 2-5 supported by evidence? Are there any naked claims supported only by variations of "I believe...”? If so, put a big X in the margin beside that paragraph.  8. (√) Is each claim backed up by a reference? If a claim stands naked of supporting evidence or argument, put a big X in the margin.  9. (√) Does the paper do more than simply but gloriously restate the question? Examine the case study and cross out all ideas that appear in both the case study and in your paper. What remains-uncrossed out is your analysis. It should constitute the majority of your paper. If it doesn't, you haven’t done an analysis.  10. (√) A sentence lacks either a subject or a verb; a sentence does not begin with a capital letter or end with a period (citations in parentheses go ahead of periods, not behind them).  I l. (√ ) A sentence begins with a relative pronoun such as Which, Who, That, Where, and When.  12. (√) A pronoun lacks a clear antecedent; that is, a word such as it, he, she, or they does not have an obvious link to a noun (especially noticeable if a sentence begins with it, he, she, or they).  13. (√ ) A pronoun or verb fails to agree with its antecedent in number; that is, a single person or agency is referred to as they, or a plural subject is given a singular verb (such as, "members of the school board....gives their vote...").  14. (√ ) A sentence runs-on or uses a comma to splice independent ideas together; that is, complex ideas are not split into two sentences but are linked, often by a comma, into an overly long, wandering sentence.