Seminar On
Clinical Trial And Its And Design
PRESENTED BY
Mhaske Sujit Ramesh
Roll No – 10
M.Pharm (Sem -02)
(Pharmacology Department)
GUIDANCE BY
Prof. Pagar Sir
M.Pharm
Pharmacology
DR. VITHALRAO VIKHE PATIL FOUNDATION’S
COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, VILAD GHAT,
AHMEDNAGAR (2022-2023)
1
*
1. Introduction
2. Types of clinical trials
3. Design of clinical trials
a) Observational designs
i. Cohort design
ii. Cross sectional design
iii. Case control study design
b) Experimental designs
i. RCT
*
*Definition given by WHO
*A clinical trial is any research study that prospectively
assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or
more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on
health outcomes.
*Interventions include but are not restricted to drugs, cells and
other biological products, surgical procedures, radiological
procedures, devices, behavioural treatments, process-of-care
changes, preventive care, etc.
*
Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Phase III
Design
features:
• Single, ascending
dose tiers
• Unblinded
• uncontrolled
• Placebo controlled
comparisons
• active controlled
comparisons
• well-defined entry
criteria
• Randomized
• Controlled
• 2-3 treatment arms
• broader eligibility
criteria
• Uncontrolled
• observational
Duration Up to 1 month Several months Several years Ongoing (following
FDA approval)
Population: Healthy volunteers or
individuals with the
target disease (such as
cancer or HIV)
Individuals with target
disease
Individuals with
target disease
Individuals with
target disease, as
well as new age
groups, genders, etc.
Sample size: 20 to 80 200 to 300 Hundreds to
thousands
Thousands
Example: • Study of a single dose
of drug X in normal
subjects
• Double-blind study
evaluating safety
and efficacy of drug
X vs. Placebo in
patients with
hypertension
• Study of drug X vs.
Standard treatment
in hypertension
study
• Study of
economic benefit
of newly-
approved drug X
vs. Standard
treatment for
hypertension
*
*
Observational
(non experimental)
cohort
Case
control
cross-
sectional
Experimental
RCT
Non RCT
*
Population
(Sample)
Exposed
(smoking)
*A population at risk for the disease events is followed over time for the
occurrence of disease and events.
*This study used to estimate how often disease or life events happen in a
certain population.
*These are the best method for determining the incidence and natural
history of a condition.
Disease
(Lung cancer)
No disease
Unexposed
Disease
(Lung cancer)
No disease
*
• A group of people is chosen who do not
have the outcome of interest (for
example, myocardial infarction).
• The investigator then measures a variety
of Variables that might be relevant to the
Development of the condition.
Prospective
• These use data already collected for other
purposes. The methodology is the same
but the study is performed.
• Outcome is already developed.
Retrospective
*
*Prospective
*Studies carried out from present time to future
*Can be tailored to collect specific exposure rate
*But long wait for events to occur
*Expensive
*Prone to high dropout rates
* Retrospective
* Look at medical events from past to present
* Information is available immediately
* Difficulty in tracing subjects and doubt on quality of recorded
information
*
*Is a type of observational study that are primarily used to determine
prevalence.
*Prevalence equals the number of cases in a population at a given
point in time.
*All the measurements on each person are made at one point in time.
Cohort Cross sectional
Study group Population at risk Entire population
Common measures Risks and rates Prevalence
*
*An observational study that compares patients who have a disease or
outcome of interest (cases) with patients who do not have the disease or
outcome (controls), and looks back retrospectively to compare how
frequently the exposure to a risk factor is present in each group
Study base
Cases
50
exposed
40
Controls
50
unexposed exposed
10 15
unexposed
35
Odds ratio
(no of exposed cases)/(no of unexposed cases)
(no of exposed control)/(no of unexposed controls)
*
• Efficient- saves time and energy
• Used for rare diseases, small sample sizes
• Can generate hypothesis for future study
*
• Susceptible to bias-recall, reporting
• Prone to methodological errors
• Selection of an appropriate comparison group may be difficult
*
*Interventional study (clinical trial) A type of clinical study in
which participants are assigned to groups that receive one or
more intervention/treatment (or no intervention) so that researchers
can evaluate the effects of the interventions on health-related
outcomes.
Interventional study
Quasi-experimental designs
True experimental designs
*
Also called nonrandomized interventional study design
*In non randomly assigned control group studies, at least two separate
groups are evaluated—
*One of which receives the intervention of interest and another that
serves as a control or comparison group.
That means it is used to estimate the causal impact of an intervention
on its target population without random assignment.
*
• One group pre-test post-test design
• Non equivalent control group design
• Interrupted time series design
*
* An epidemiological experiment in which subjects in a population
are randomly allocated into groups, usually called study and control
groups, to receive or not receive an experimental preventive or
therapeutic
*Patients are randomly assigned to the study all groups that help in
avoiding bias in patient
Study
population
Intervention
group
Control group
Outcome
No
outcome
Outcome
No
outcome
(Randomized Clinical Trial)
*
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial includes Diagnostic,
Therapeutic, Prophylactic
e.g. Evaluation of nitrates in reducing cardiovascular mortality
Randomized Controlled Field Trial: It is similar to an Randomized
Controlled Clinical Trial except that the intervention is preventive
and not therapeutic.
e.g. In this, the efficacy of a preventive intervention such as a
new vaccine is tested in one study group and the other group
receives a placebo or standard
Preventive Trial: Trial of primary preventive measures
e.g. Vaccines
Risk Factor Trial: Investigator intervenes to interrupt the usual
sequence in the development of disease for those individuals who
have risk factor for developing the disease
e.g. Primary prevention of CHD using simvastatin to lower
serum cholesterol
*
*Any systematic deviation from true results.
*It may be any error in the design, conduct or analysis of a study that
results in distortion of truth.
Experiment
Untruth
Untruth
Truth
*
Study design
treatment
Data collection
Data analysis and publication
Sources of Bias
Investigator
Participant
Statistician
Literature
Instrument
*
*Mann, C.J., 2003. Observational research methods. Research
design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control
studies. Emergency medicine journal, 20(1), pp.54-60.
*Grimes, D.A. and Schulz, K.F., 2002. Bias and causal
associations in observational research. The Lancet, 359(9302),
pp.248-252.
*www.who.int/topics/clinical_trials/en
THANKYOU
FORPATIENCE

clinicaltrials-itstypesanddesigns-180422061617 (1).pptx

  • 1.
    Seminar On Clinical TrialAnd Its And Design PRESENTED BY Mhaske Sujit Ramesh Roll No – 10 M.Pharm (Sem -02) (Pharmacology Department) GUIDANCE BY Prof. Pagar Sir M.Pharm Pharmacology DR. VITHALRAO VIKHE PATIL FOUNDATION’S COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, VILAD GHAT, AHMEDNAGAR (2022-2023) 1
  • 2.
    * 1. Introduction 2. Typesof clinical trials 3. Design of clinical trials a) Observational designs i. Cohort design ii. Cross sectional design iii. Case control study design b) Experimental designs i. RCT
  • 3.
    * *Definition given byWHO *A clinical trial is any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes. *Interventions include but are not restricted to drugs, cells and other biological products, surgical procedures, radiological procedures, devices, behavioural treatments, process-of-care changes, preventive care, etc.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Phase 0 PhaseI Phase II Phase III Design features: • Single, ascending dose tiers • Unblinded • uncontrolled • Placebo controlled comparisons • active controlled comparisons • well-defined entry criteria • Randomized • Controlled • 2-3 treatment arms • broader eligibility criteria • Uncontrolled • observational Duration Up to 1 month Several months Several years Ongoing (following FDA approval) Population: Healthy volunteers or individuals with the target disease (such as cancer or HIV) Individuals with target disease Individuals with target disease Individuals with target disease, as well as new age groups, genders, etc. Sample size: 20 to 80 200 to 300 Hundreds to thousands Thousands Example: • Study of a single dose of drug X in normal subjects • Double-blind study evaluating safety and efficacy of drug X vs. Placebo in patients with hypertension • Study of drug X vs. Standard treatment in hypertension study • Study of economic benefit of newly- approved drug X vs. Standard treatment for hypertension
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    * Population (Sample) Exposed (smoking) *A population atrisk for the disease events is followed over time for the occurrence of disease and events. *This study used to estimate how often disease or life events happen in a certain population. *These are the best method for determining the incidence and natural history of a condition. Disease (Lung cancer) No disease Unexposed Disease (Lung cancer) No disease
  • 9.
    * • A groupof people is chosen who do not have the outcome of interest (for example, myocardial infarction). • The investigator then measures a variety of Variables that might be relevant to the Development of the condition. Prospective • These use data already collected for other purposes. The methodology is the same but the study is performed. • Outcome is already developed. Retrospective
  • 10.
    * *Prospective *Studies carried outfrom present time to future *Can be tailored to collect specific exposure rate *But long wait for events to occur *Expensive *Prone to high dropout rates * Retrospective * Look at medical events from past to present * Information is available immediately * Difficulty in tracing subjects and doubt on quality of recorded information
  • 11.
    * *Is a typeof observational study that are primarily used to determine prevalence. *Prevalence equals the number of cases in a population at a given point in time. *All the measurements on each person are made at one point in time. Cohort Cross sectional Study group Population at risk Entire population Common measures Risks and rates Prevalence
  • 12.
    * *An observational studythat compares patients who have a disease or outcome of interest (cases) with patients who do not have the disease or outcome (controls), and looks back retrospectively to compare how frequently the exposure to a risk factor is present in each group Study base Cases 50 exposed 40 Controls 50 unexposed exposed 10 15 unexposed 35 Odds ratio (no of exposed cases)/(no of unexposed cases) (no of exposed control)/(no of unexposed controls)
  • 13.
    * • Efficient- savestime and energy • Used for rare diseases, small sample sizes • Can generate hypothesis for future study * • Susceptible to bias-recall, reporting • Prone to methodological errors • Selection of an appropriate comparison group may be difficult
  • 14.
    * *Interventional study (clinicaltrial) A type of clinical study in which participants are assigned to groups that receive one or more intervention/treatment (or no intervention) so that researchers can evaluate the effects of the interventions on health-related outcomes. Interventional study Quasi-experimental designs True experimental designs
  • 15.
    * Also called nonrandomizedinterventional study design *In non randomly assigned control group studies, at least two separate groups are evaluated— *One of which receives the intervention of interest and another that serves as a control or comparison group. That means it is used to estimate the causal impact of an intervention on its target population without random assignment.
  • 16.
    * • One grouppre-test post-test design • Non equivalent control group design • Interrupted time series design
  • 17.
    * * An epidemiologicalexperiment in which subjects in a population are randomly allocated into groups, usually called study and control groups, to receive or not receive an experimental preventive or therapeutic *Patients are randomly assigned to the study all groups that help in avoiding bias in patient Study population Intervention group Control group Outcome No outcome Outcome No outcome (Randomized Clinical Trial)
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Randomized Controlled ClinicalTrial includes Diagnostic, Therapeutic, Prophylactic e.g. Evaluation of nitrates in reducing cardiovascular mortality Randomized Controlled Field Trial: It is similar to an Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial except that the intervention is preventive and not therapeutic. e.g. In this, the efficacy of a preventive intervention such as a new vaccine is tested in one study group and the other group receives a placebo or standard Preventive Trial: Trial of primary preventive measures e.g. Vaccines Risk Factor Trial: Investigator intervenes to interrupt the usual sequence in the development of disease for those individuals who have risk factor for developing the disease e.g. Primary prevention of CHD using simvastatin to lower serum cholesterol
  • 20.
    * *Any systematic deviationfrom true results. *It may be any error in the design, conduct or analysis of a study that results in distortion of truth. Experiment Untruth Untruth Truth
  • 21.
    * Study design treatment Data collection Dataanalysis and publication Sources of Bias Investigator Participant Statistician Literature Instrument
  • 22.
    * *Mann, C.J., 2003.Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency medicine journal, 20(1), pp.54-60. *Grimes, D.A. and Schulz, K.F., 2002. Bias and causal associations in observational research. The Lancet, 359(9302), pp.248-252. *www.who.int/topics/clinical_trials/en
  • 23.