This document discusses a presentation on the politicization and corruption of climate science based on evidence from books and the Climategate emails. It provides context on government spending on climate change, and the potential policy and economic consequences of proposals like the Green New Deal. It then summarizes evidence from the Climategate emails of scientists colluding to thwart FOI requests, pressure journals/editors, discuss issues like the decline in temperatures, and manipulate temperature data. The document aims to show how climate science has become politicized and corrupted.
This document provides biographical information about the author, John Costella, and introduces his edited compilation of the Climategate emails. It is dedicated to the memory of John Daly, an early climate skeptic. The foreword discusses how the emails expose a previously hidden world where a small group of climate scientists were able to control temperature data and influence the peer review process. It argues this was a real conspiracy and that Steve McIntyre performed a great service by requesting data and programs. The introduction explains why Climategate is so distressing to scientists because it undermines the scientific method and trust in the peer review process.
Evaluating online sources on Climate ChangeMartin Balupa
The group collected sources on good and bad sources of information about climate change. They found two good sources from a library database, including a current quote stating climate change is caused by human activity. They evaluated the sources as authoritative and accurate based on the authors and evidence. They also found a bad source from an online article about hacked emails questioning climate science. They deemed this a bad source as it was not peer-reviewed, sought to discredit science, and lacked strong evidence.
Social media and crisis communication in higher edAndrew Careaga
The document discusses best practices for using social media in crisis communication. It provides case studies of how universities have used social media to communicate during crises like a suicide jumper incident and building fire. It outlines Missouri University of Science and Technology's social media response during a 2011 campus lockdown due to a gunman, highlighting lessons learned. The document advocates for developing a crisis communication team and testing communication plans to effectively use social media, text, and websites to update stakeholders during emergencies.
Climate Change: Science Versus Consensus and AlarmismTJSomething
This document discusses skepticism about claims of catastrophic human-caused climate change and analyzes Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth". It notes that global temperatures have risen in recent centuries but that natural factors also influence the climate. The author argues that climate models have limitations and that some scientists have distorted data to support alarmist views for political or funding reasons.
This document provides a brief history of attacks on climate science, climate scientists, and the IPCC over the past 20 years by climate denial groups and individuals. It describes how in the early 1990s, fossil fuel industry groups like the Global Climate Coalition recruited spokespeople to publicly question the science and certainty of climate change. It traces key moments like attacks on the IPCC's first assessment report in 1990 and outlines how the denial campaign intensified with subsequent assessment reports in 1995, 2001, and 2007. The document also examines the tactics used in the campaign, including promoting misleading science, attacking individual scientists, and gaining political influence. It concludes that after 20 years, climate denial has taken deep root in some English-speaking countries.
This document discusses how information about climate change is communicated and framed by different groups. It explores how scientists communicate their findings and who believes climate change is real based on evidence. It also examines how fossil fuel industry groups have run disinformation campaigns using tobacco industry tactics to sow doubt and delay action, similar to how tobacco companies denied health risks of smoking for decades.
This document discusses the debate around climate change and global warming. It presents perspectives from both sides of the debate, including skepticism of the science from some politicians and acceptance of the human role from some businesses. It also summarizes the "Climategate" controversy involving hacked emails from a climate research unit. While some used the emails to argue the science is disproven, the rebuttal is that nothing in the emails undermines the established science that global warming is occurring and human-caused. The document provides context around the political debate through various quotes and sources.
Dan Miller, an engineer and venture capitalist focused on non-polluting energy technologies, blogs on climate at ClimatePlace.org and helped NASA climate scientist James E. Hansen prepare his recent New York Times Op-Ed article, “Game Over for the Climate.” Miller complained about the Dot Earth post in which the climate scientists Martin Hoerling and Kerry Emanuel separately criticized aspects of Hansen’s piece and was offered a chance to write the following “Your Dot” post.
This document provides biographical information about the author, John Costella, and introduces his edited compilation of the Climategate emails. It is dedicated to the memory of John Daly, an early climate skeptic. The foreword discusses how the emails expose a previously hidden world where a small group of climate scientists were able to control temperature data and influence the peer review process. It argues this was a real conspiracy and that Steve McIntyre performed a great service by requesting data and programs. The introduction explains why Climategate is so distressing to scientists because it undermines the scientific method and trust in the peer review process.
Evaluating online sources on Climate ChangeMartin Balupa
The group collected sources on good and bad sources of information about climate change. They found two good sources from a library database, including a current quote stating climate change is caused by human activity. They evaluated the sources as authoritative and accurate based on the authors and evidence. They also found a bad source from an online article about hacked emails questioning climate science. They deemed this a bad source as it was not peer-reviewed, sought to discredit science, and lacked strong evidence.
Social media and crisis communication in higher edAndrew Careaga
The document discusses best practices for using social media in crisis communication. It provides case studies of how universities have used social media to communicate during crises like a suicide jumper incident and building fire. It outlines Missouri University of Science and Technology's social media response during a 2011 campus lockdown due to a gunman, highlighting lessons learned. The document advocates for developing a crisis communication team and testing communication plans to effectively use social media, text, and websites to update stakeholders during emergencies.
Climate Change: Science Versus Consensus and AlarmismTJSomething
This document discusses skepticism about claims of catastrophic human-caused climate change and analyzes Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth". It notes that global temperatures have risen in recent centuries but that natural factors also influence the climate. The author argues that climate models have limitations and that some scientists have distorted data to support alarmist views for political or funding reasons.
This document provides a brief history of attacks on climate science, climate scientists, and the IPCC over the past 20 years by climate denial groups and individuals. It describes how in the early 1990s, fossil fuel industry groups like the Global Climate Coalition recruited spokespeople to publicly question the science and certainty of climate change. It traces key moments like attacks on the IPCC's first assessment report in 1990 and outlines how the denial campaign intensified with subsequent assessment reports in 1995, 2001, and 2007. The document also examines the tactics used in the campaign, including promoting misleading science, attacking individual scientists, and gaining political influence. It concludes that after 20 years, climate denial has taken deep root in some English-speaking countries.
This document discusses how information about climate change is communicated and framed by different groups. It explores how scientists communicate their findings and who believes climate change is real based on evidence. It also examines how fossil fuel industry groups have run disinformation campaigns using tobacco industry tactics to sow doubt and delay action, similar to how tobacco companies denied health risks of smoking for decades.
This document discusses the debate around climate change and global warming. It presents perspectives from both sides of the debate, including skepticism of the science from some politicians and acceptance of the human role from some businesses. It also summarizes the "Climategate" controversy involving hacked emails from a climate research unit. While some used the emails to argue the science is disproven, the rebuttal is that nothing in the emails undermines the established science that global warming is occurring and human-caused. The document provides context around the political debate through various quotes and sources.
Dan Miller, an engineer and venture capitalist focused on non-polluting energy technologies, blogs on climate at ClimatePlace.org and helped NASA climate scientist James E. Hansen prepare his recent New York Times Op-Ed article, “Game Over for the Climate.” Miller complained about the Dot Earth post in which the climate scientists Martin Hoerling and Kerry Emanuel separately criticized aspects of Hansen’s piece and was offered a chance to write the following “Your Dot” post.
The document discusses the 2009 hacking of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia which led to public questions about the reliability and honesty of climate scientists. It summarizes concerns raised about the scientists' expressed reluctance to share data and code as requested, as well as references to a "trick" used to "hide the decline". However, it also notes that nothing in the emails provides evidence of a conspiracy or data falsification. The document examines issues around scientific transparency, biases, and building public trust in science.
The document presents perspectives from both sides of the global warming debate. It provides quotes and opinions from scientists who believe human-caused global warming is a serious threat, as well as quotes from scientists who are skeptical of this view or believe natural factors are causing climate changes. The document does not take a clear stance and instead aims to show there are differing views among experts on the issue.
The document discusses global warming and questions the human contribution to rising temperatures. It argues that CO2 levels have only a minor impact on the atmosphere and temperature increases have lagged CO2 levels in ice core data. It criticizes the IPCC for political bias and lack of scientific rigor in its conclusions about human-caused global warming. The document concludes that global warming remains unproven and a critical examination of evidence on both sides is needed.
From across the spectrum of governmental agencies, a selection of suppressive activity is examined relying on quotes from the involved and affected participants themselves.
Global Warming Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay On Artificial Intelligence
Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Energy
Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Argumentative Essay On The Movie Get Out
Argumentative Essay On Sexual Abuse
Argumentative Essay Sample
Argumentative Essays
Argumentative Essay About Sexual Assault
Argumentative Essay On Minimum Wage
An Argument Essay About Discrimination
Argumentative Reflection
Argumentative Essay On Online Dating
Examples Of Argumentative Essay
Essay about Arguing Against Standardized Testing
Argumentative Essay On World Hunger
Mental Health In College Students Essay
Carbon CycleThis module uses a variety of sources to educate.docxtidwellveronique
This document presents information on both sides of the debate around human-caused climate change. It includes definitions of bias and discusses theories that climate change is caused by natural cycles or human activity. The document also summarizes two films with opposing views - An Inconvenient Truth argues climate change is human-caused while The Great Global Warming Swindle argues it is not significantly increased by humans.
To identify if the U.S. Media presents a biased view of global warming, the following are discussed
1) the theoretical perspective of media and the environment;
2) scientific overview and history of global warming;
3) media coverage of global warming, and
4) research findings from the content analysis of three countries' newspaper articles and two international scientific journals produced in 2000 with comparison of these countries economies, industries, and environments.
A presentation prepared for the Archdiocese of Chicago's Office of Human Dignity and Solidarity, June 6, 2018.
Event description: "Join the Office of Human Dignity and Solidarity on Wednesday, June 6 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. as we answer Pope Francis’ call to 'each person on this living planet' to care for our common home. Because everyone’s home is different, creating effective campaigns around this initiative can be challenging. During this seminary, Assistant Professor of Journalism Jill Hopke of DePaul University will share insights from the latest social science research on how to design communication strategies that connect climate change to daily life and tips for choosing engaging climate visuals. Participants will get ideas for how to tell new narratives about the human toll of our changing climate, as well as for building community resiliency and climate hope."
1) The document summarizes evidence that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are driving observed increases in global temperatures. It discusses the complex, interdisciplinary nature of climate change research and refutes claims that the field is motivated by funding or politics.
2) Key aspects of Earth's climate system are described, including the greenhouse effect which makes the planet habitable. The role of human emissions of greenhouse gases in increasing surface temperatures is explained, though uncertainties remain about future impacts.
3) The skepticism expressed in a recent editorial by Spier is addressed. While skepticism can be valuable, the evidence indicates Spier's specific doubts regarding temperature data and ice core records are unwarranted.
The document discusses the melting of glaciers due to global warming and the problems that this causes. Glaciers around the world, including the large ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland, have been shrinking and retreating in recent decades. This melting is accelerated by rising global temperatures. The shrinking of glaciers threatens water supplies and will displace millions of people as sea levels rise. Scientists use various techniques like satellite observations, aerial surveys, and satellite gravimetry to measure changes in glacier mass and confirm that ice loss is increasing over the long term.
TSEM 102.007, 069
Fall 2022
Ten-Page Writing Assignment
Guidelines
The overall objectives to be met in completing the ten-page written assignment are as follows:
· Prepare and present a compelling substantive interpretation, argument, and/or analysis of a problem or issue in a research paper.
· Gather and use academic resources effectively and according to the standards and rules of academic integrity in formulating and presenting a substantive interpretation, argument, and/or analysis of a problem or issue.
· Understand and evaluate the nature and possible causes and implications of events, behavior, problems, and issues from an informed and intellectually balanced perspective.
· Connect concepts and empirical evidence in logically coherent, valid, and compelling ways.
To complete this assignment, choose an issue, problem, or historical event that has been viewed in different ways by individuals and groups with different perspectives, political positions, and overall contexts. Identify the specific issue and associated problem that it represents, keeping in mind that how the problem occurs for individuals and/or groups is based on their context and its drivers. As you identify your topic, key on the following questions:
· What name is used by individuals and groups in referring to this issue, problem, or event? (e.g., “voting rights,” “the Challenger disaster,” “the war on drugs.”) Bear in mind that the same issue may be referred to differently by different individuals and groups.
· What problem or problems need to be addressed and resolved in this matter?
· How do different individuals and groups see the problem or problems?
· How does individual and/or group context influence how the problem occurs for different individuals and groups.
· What are the different views and perspectives on the nature of this problem and its solution? How does context influence this? (Be sure to identify all of the different positions represented in this matter, whether you agree with them or not.)
· What do the different views of the problem and its solution have in common? What are the differences?
· How, if at all, can the differences be reconciled?
· How does your own context affect the way you have approached the above questions?
· Which of the views and solutions you have identified have the most merit?
· What would you advocate as the solution to the problem? How do you support your position?
Steps
· Identify your topic
· Write a one-page summary of the key issue(s) at stake in addressing this topic
· Research the different views and evidence regarding the topic
· List the different views of this topic and the bases for those views
· Identify the specific problem(s) to be solved.
· Evaluate the different views of how this problem should be solved.
· Write the final paper.
Target dates
· Identify topic/one page-summary – 1 November
· Provide a list of different issues and views present in the topic – 15 November
· Outline the paper – .
This document summarizes and forwards an email from "S. Fred Singer" discussing various topics related to climate change and global warming. The email discusses recent news articles and studies that question the degree of scientific consensus around human-caused climate change. It argues that climate models have high uncertainties and that some climate alarmists have exaggerated risks and uncertainties to advocate for policy actions like the Kyoto Protocol. The document criticizes some climate scientists and activists for altering official reports to overstate evidence of climate impacts and for justifying advocacy as their role even when it compromises ethics and objectivity in journalism.
New Research Reveal For Global Warming. If you research a news for Global Warming then you are right place.
New Research Reveal For Global Warming
New Research Reveals Global Warming
New research reveals global warming, much more so in the face of global warming than just the heat of the sun.
The following article is a complete Amy Feinstein opinion and does not reflect the views of Inquisitr.
A new study from the University of California at Irvine reveals an amazing new phenomenon that is contributing to global warming. According to a new study, there is more to human-induced global warming than just the heat of the sun.
Detailed research on how the recent tropical cyclone season could affect future global warming has been published, and it explains that it is not a matter of if, but a matter of when.
For decades, scientists have had to decide whether emissions of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), have been a major factor in climate change. All the while, they have come to realize that the answer is yes. As a result, almost every major scientific institution in the world has declared climate change an urgent need for humanity.
It is a matter of great responsibility and urgency, considering the potentially dangerous and dangerous effects climate change can have on people and the environment, especially for people living in extremely hot parts of the world. In some places daytime temperatures are estimated to rise by seven degrees Fahrenheit. In the United States alone, over half a million people die each year from heat-related illnesses.
This presents a serious problem, and one of the key issues is how to respond to climate change and a changed environment. How can people be provided with the necessary resources to prevent heat-related diseases and deaths?
Also read :New Research Reveal For Global Warming || Global Warming Effects
The answer, according to a new study, comes in the form of melting glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic regions, according to a new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) by researchers at the University of California at Irvine. . In short, the study suggests that global warming will have a greater impact on global warming than previously thought, as glaciers and glaciers evaporate, warming the oceans, and increasing sea levels.
The report makes the following statement on the effect of melting ice in the Arctic and Antarctic:
"'It' s called an exciting problem with how to increase the temperature without freezing," said David Pollard, a climate scientist and geophysicist at UC Irvine.
Global Warming Effects
Global Warming Effects
global warming effects in Florida being felt now, NWS says
How the 'Bomb Cyclone' affected the East Coast
The 'bomb cyclone' dropped considerably more snow in New York City than originally predicted. Here's a look at how the winter storm affected cities along the East Coast.
MIAMI, Fla. - The United
A Brief Perspective On Climate Change SkepticismJeff Brooks
This document discusses the history of climate change skepticism from its origins in the 19th century to modern times. It outlines several key instances where early scientific work on the greenhouse effect and links between CO2 and temperature were met with skepticism by other scientists. More recently, the document suggests that climate models have been unreliable in their predictions and that the portrayal of a 97% scientific consensus on human-caused warming is misleading. Overall, the document argues that skepticism is a natural and important part of the scientific process.
Incorporating the global warming issue into a ktsp paper-teflin 2010Mierza Miranti
This document summarizes a paper that describes integrating the issue of global warming into an English language lesson in Indonesia. It provides background on the KTSP curriculum and the goals of developing students as global citizens. It then discusses the ongoing debate around global warming, noting there are two sides - some believe it is occurring and human-caused, while others believe the data is unreliable. The lesson will expose students to research supporting both perspectives in order to have them think critically and take a stance in a debate.
A new book published by the NIPCC that lays bare and refutes the notion there is an "overwhelming consensus" that man-made global warming is happening. The book was issued on the first day of the Paris COP-21 meeting--a theatrical production meant to fool citizens of the planet that they are somehow in danger of too much carbon in the atmosphere. It is a transparent attempt to kill the use of fossil fuels and directly control the lives of free peoples like those living in the United States.
This document proposes a new framework for studying online climate change communication based on an encoding/decoding model that accounts for pluralistic internet texts and audiences. It summarizes previous research that focused on risk communication, media framing, and the information deficit model. It argues more research is needed on cultural discourses, conceptualizing audiences beyond passive recipients, and analyzing communication on digital platforms given their rise. A new approach is needed to understand audiences as both consumers and producers of online content regarding climate change.
Leveraging Learning To Rank in an Optimization Framework for Timeline Summari...Nattiya Kanhabua
With the tremendous amount of news published on the Web every day, helping users explore news events on a given topic of interest is an acute problem. Timeline summaries have recently emerged as a simple and effective solution for users to navigate through temporally related news events. In this paper, we propose an optimization framework and demonstrate the use of Learning To Rank (LTR) to automatically construct timeline summaries from Web news articles. Experimental evaluations show that our approach outperforms existing solutions in producing high quality timeline summaries.
This document is an email newsletter from the National Center for Public Policy Research discussing global warming. It provides background on upcoming Senate debates and hearings on global warming legislation. It also excerpts arguments questioning the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming, including that the best climate models cannot accurately predict future temperatures or humankind's impact. Recommended links are included for additional information from analyses questioning the extent and causes of global warming.
The document discusses the upcoming debate on global warming in the US Senate. It notes that several amendments on global warming are expected to be proposed as part of consideration of the Senate Energy Bill. It provides counterarguments to the theory of human-caused global warming, citing analyses questioning the scientific consensus on the causes and impacts of climate change. The document recommends several analyses and studies that are skeptical of the view that human greenhouse gas emissions are the dominant cause of observed global temperature increases.
The document discusses the 2009 hacking of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia which led to public questions about the reliability and honesty of climate scientists. It summarizes concerns raised about the scientists' expressed reluctance to share data and code as requested, as well as references to a "trick" used to "hide the decline". However, it also notes that nothing in the emails provides evidence of a conspiracy or data falsification. The document examines issues around scientific transparency, biases, and building public trust in science.
The document presents perspectives from both sides of the global warming debate. It provides quotes and opinions from scientists who believe human-caused global warming is a serious threat, as well as quotes from scientists who are skeptical of this view or believe natural factors are causing climate changes. The document does not take a clear stance and instead aims to show there are differing views among experts on the issue.
The document discusses global warming and questions the human contribution to rising temperatures. It argues that CO2 levels have only a minor impact on the atmosphere and temperature increases have lagged CO2 levels in ice core data. It criticizes the IPCC for political bias and lack of scientific rigor in its conclusions about human-caused global warming. The document concludes that global warming remains unproven and a critical examination of evidence on both sides is needed.
From across the spectrum of governmental agencies, a selection of suppressive activity is examined relying on quotes from the involved and affected participants themselves.
Global Warming Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay On Artificial Intelligence
Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Energy
Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Argumentative Essay On The Movie Get Out
Argumentative Essay On Sexual Abuse
Argumentative Essay Sample
Argumentative Essays
Argumentative Essay About Sexual Assault
Argumentative Essay On Minimum Wage
An Argument Essay About Discrimination
Argumentative Reflection
Argumentative Essay On Online Dating
Examples Of Argumentative Essay
Essay about Arguing Against Standardized Testing
Argumentative Essay On World Hunger
Mental Health In College Students Essay
Carbon CycleThis module uses a variety of sources to educate.docxtidwellveronique
This document presents information on both sides of the debate around human-caused climate change. It includes definitions of bias and discusses theories that climate change is caused by natural cycles or human activity. The document also summarizes two films with opposing views - An Inconvenient Truth argues climate change is human-caused while The Great Global Warming Swindle argues it is not significantly increased by humans.
To identify if the U.S. Media presents a biased view of global warming, the following are discussed
1) the theoretical perspective of media and the environment;
2) scientific overview and history of global warming;
3) media coverage of global warming, and
4) research findings from the content analysis of three countries' newspaper articles and two international scientific journals produced in 2000 with comparison of these countries economies, industries, and environments.
A presentation prepared for the Archdiocese of Chicago's Office of Human Dignity and Solidarity, June 6, 2018.
Event description: "Join the Office of Human Dignity and Solidarity on Wednesday, June 6 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. as we answer Pope Francis’ call to 'each person on this living planet' to care for our common home. Because everyone’s home is different, creating effective campaigns around this initiative can be challenging. During this seminary, Assistant Professor of Journalism Jill Hopke of DePaul University will share insights from the latest social science research on how to design communication strategies that connect climate change to daily life and tips for choosing engaging climate visuals. Participants will get ideas for how to tell new narratives about the human toll of our changing climate, as well as for building community resiliency and climate hope."
1) The document summarizes evidence that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are driving observed increases in global temperatures. It discusses the complex, interdisciplinary nature of climate change research and refutes claims that the field is motivated by funding or politics.
2) Key aspects of Earth's climate system are described, including the greenhouse effect which makes the planet habitable. The role of human emissions of greenhouse gases in increasing surface temperatures is explained, though uncertainties remain about future impacts.
3) The skepticism expressed in a recent editorial by Spier is addressed. While skepticism can be valuable, the evidence indicates Spier's specific doubts regarding temperature data and ice core records are unwarranted.
The document discusses the melting of glaciers due to global warming and the problems that this causes. Glaciers around the world, including the large ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland, have been shrinking and retreating in recent decades. This melting is accelerated by rising global temperatures. The shrinking of glaciers threatens water supplies and will displace millions of people as sea levels rise. Scientists use various techniques like satellite observations, aerial surveys, and satellite gravimetry to measure changes in glacier mass and confirm that ice loss is increasing over the long term.
TSEM 102.007, 069
Fall 2022
Ten-Page Writing Assignment
Guidelines
The overall objectives to be met in completing the ten-page written assignment are as follows:
· Prepare and present a compelling substantive interpretation, argument, and/or analysis of a problem or issue in a research paper.
· Gather and use academic resources effectively and according to the standards and rules of academic integrity in formulating and presenting a substantive interpretation, argument, and/or analysis of a problem or issue.
· Understand and evaluate the nature and possible causes and implications of events, behavior, problems, and issues from an informed and intellectually balanced perspective.
· Connect concepts and empirical evidence in logically coherent, valid, and compelling ways.
To complete this assignment, choose an issue, problem, or historical event that has been viewed in different ways by individuals and groups with different perspectives, political positions, and overall contexts. Identify the specific issue and associated problem that it represents, keeping in mind that how the problem occurs for individuals and/or groups is based on their context and its drivers. As you identify your topic, key on the following questions:
· What name is used by individuals and groups in referring to this issue, problem, or event? (e.g., “voting rights,” “the Challenger disaster,” “the war on drugs.”) Bear in mind that the same issue may be referred to differently by different individuals and groups.
· What problem or problems need to be addressed and resolved in this matter?
· How do different individuals and groups see the problem or problems?
· How does individual and/or group context influence how the problem occurs for different individuals and groups.
· What are the different views and perspectives on the nature of this problem and its solution? How does context influence this? (Be sure to identify all of the different positions represented in this matter, whether you agree with them or not.)
· What do the different views of the problem and its solution have in common? What are the differences?
· How, if at all, can the differences be reconciled?
· How does your own context affect the way you have approached the above questions?
· Which of the views and solutions you have identified have the most merit?
· What would you advocate as the solution to the problem? How do you support your position?
Steps
· Identify your topic
· Write a one-page summary of the key issue(s) at stake in addressing this topic
· Research the different views and evidence regarding the topic
· List the different views of this topic and the bases for those views
· Identify the specific problem(s) to be solved.
· Evaluate the different views of how this problem should be solved.
· Write the final paper.
Target dates
· Identify topic/one page-summary – 1 November
· Provide a list of different issues and views present in the topic – 15 November
· Outline the paper – .
This document summarizes and forwards an email from "S. Fred Singer" discussing various topics related to climate change and global warming. The email discusses recent news articles and studies that question the degree of scientific consensus around human-caused climate change. It argues that climate models have high uncertainties and that some climate alarmists have exaggerated risks and uncertainties to advocate for policy actions like the Kyoto Protocol. The document criticizes some climate scientists and activists for altering official reports to overstate evidence of climate impacts and for justifying advocacy as their role even when it compromises ethics and objectivity in journalism.
New Research Reveal For Global Warming. If you research a news for Global Warming then you are right place.
New Research Reveal For Global Warming
New Research Reveals Global Warming
New research reveals global warming, much more so in the face of global warming than just the heat of the sun.
The following article is a complete Amy Feinstein opinion and does not reflect the views of Inquisitr.
A new study from the University of California at Irvine reveals an amazing new phenomenon that is contributing to global warming. According to a new study, there is more to human-induced global warming than just the heat of the sun.
Detailed research on how the recent tropical cyclone season could affect future global warming has been published, and it explains that it is not a matter of if, but a matter of when.
For decades, scientists have had to decide whether emissions of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), have been a major factor in climate change. All the while, they have come to realize that the answer is yes. As a result, almost every major scientific institution in the world has declared climate change an urgent need for humanity.
It is a matter of great responsibility and urgency, considering the potentially dangerous and dangerous effects climate change can have on people and the environment, especially for people living in extremely hot parts of the world. In some places daytime temperatures are estimated to rise by seven degrees Fahrenheit. In the United States alone, over half a million people die each year from heat-related illnesses.
This presents a serious problem, and one of the key issues is how to respond to climate change and a changed environment. How can people be provided with the necessary resources to prevent heat-related diseases and deaths?
Also read :New Research Reveal For Global Warming || Global Warming Effects
The answer, according to a new study, comes in the form of melting glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic regions, according to a new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) by researchers at the University of California at Irvine. . In short, the study suggests that global warming will have a greater impact on global warming than previously thought, as glaciers and glaciers evaporate, warming the oceans, and increasing sea levels.
The report makes the following statement on the effect of melting ice in the Arctic and Antarctic:
"'It' s called an exciting problem with how to increase the temperature without freezing," said David Pollard, a climate scientist and geophysicist at UC Irvine.
Global Warming Effects
Global Warming Effects
global warming effects in Florida being felt now, NWS says
How the 'Bomb Cyclone' affected the East Coast
The 'bomb cyclone' dropped considerably more snow in New York City than originally predicted. Here's a look at how the winter storm affected cities along the East Coast.
MIAMI, Fla. - The United
A Brief Perspective On Climate Change SkepticismJeff Brooks
This document discusses the history of climate change skepticism from its origins in the 19th century to modern times. It outlines several key instances where early scientific work on the greenhouse effect and links between CO2 and temperature were met with skepticism by other scientists. More recently, the document suggests that climate models have been unreliable in their predictions and that the portrayal of a 97% scientific consensus on human-caused warming is misleading. Overall, the document argues that skepticism is a natural and important part of the scientific process.
Incorporating the global warming issue into a ktsp paper-teflin 2010Mierza Miranti
This document summarizes a paper that describes integrating the issue of global warming into an English language lesson in Indonesia. It provides background on the KTSP curriculum and the goals of developing students as global citizens. It then discusses the ongoing debate around global warming, noting there are two sides - some believe it is occurring and human-caused, while others believe the data is unreliable. The lesson will expose students to research supporting both perspectives in order to have them think critically and take a stance in a debate.
A new book published by the NIPCC that lays bare and refutes the notion there is an "overwhelming consensus" that man-made global warming is happening. The book was issued on the first day of the Paris COP-21 meeting--a theatrical production meant to fool citizens of the planet that they are somehow in danger of too much carbon in the atmosphere. It is a transparent attempt to kill the use of fossil fuels and directly control the lives of free peoples like those living in the United States.
This document proposes a new framework for studying online climate change communication based on an encoding/decoding model that accounts for pluralistic internet texts and audiences. It summarizes previous research that focused on risk communication, media framing, and the information deficit model. It argues more research is needed on cultural discourses, conceptualizing audiences beyond passive recipients, and analyzing communication on digital platforms given their rise. A new approach is needed to understand audiences as both consumers and producers of online content regarding climate change.
Leveraging Learning To Rank in an Optimization Framework for Timeline Summari...Nattiya Kanhabua
With the tremendous amount of news published on the Web every day, helping users explore news events on a given topic of interest is an acute problem. Timeline summaries have recently emerged as a simple and effective solution for users to navigate through temporally related news events. In this paper, we propose an optimization framework and demonstrate the use of Learning To Rank (LTR) to automatically construct timeline summaries from Web news articles. Experimental evaluations show that our approach outperforms existing solutions in producing high quality timeline summaries.
This document is an email newsletter from the National Center for Public Policy Research discussing global warming. It provides background on upcoming Senate debates and hearings on global warming legislation. It also excerpts arguments questioning the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming, including that the best climate models cannot accurately predict future temperatures or humankind's impact. Recommended links are included for additional information from analyses questioning the extent and causes of global warming.
The document discusses the upcoming debate on global warming in the US Senate. It notes that several amendments on global warming are expected to be proposed as part of consideration of the Senate Energy Bill. It provides counterarguments to the theory of human-caused global warming, citing analyses questioning the scientific consensus on the causes and impacts of climate change. The document recommends several analyses and studies that are skeptical of the view that human greenhouse gas emissions are the dominant cause of observed global temperature increases.
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...Leonel Morgado
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths ForwardLeonel Morgado
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
When I was asked to give a companion lecture in support of ‘The Philosophy of Science’ (https://shorturl.at/4pUXz) I decided not to walk through the detail of the many methodologies in order of use. Instead, I chose to employ a long standing, and ongoing, scientific development as an exemplar. And so, I chose the ever evolving story of Thermodynamics as a scientific investigation at its best.
Conducted over a period of >200 years, Thermodynamics R&D, and application, benefitted from the highest levels of professionalism, collaboration, and technical thoroughness. New layers of application, methodology, and practice were made possible by the progressive advance of technology. In turn, this has seen measurement and modelling accuracy continually improved at a micro and macro level.
Perhaps most importantly, Thermodynamics rapidly became a primary tool in the advance of applied science/engineering/technology, spanning micro-tech, to aerospace and cosmology. I can think of no better a story to illustrate the breadth of scientific methodologies and applications at their best.
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
The cost of acquiring information by natural selectionCarl Bergstrom
This is a short talk that I gave at the Banff International Research Station workshop on Modeling and Theory in Population Biology. The idea is to try to understand how the burden of natural selection relates to the amount of information that selection puts into the genome.
It's based on the first part of this research paper:
The cost of information acquisition by natural selection
Ryan Seamus McGee, Olivia Kosterlitz, Artem Kaznatcheev, Benjamin Kerr, Carl T. Bergstrom
bioRxiv 2022.07.02.498577; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.02.498577
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically youngSérgio Sacani
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
(June 12, 2024) Webinar: Development of PET theranostics targeting the molecu...Scintica Instrumentation
Targeting Hsp90 and its pathogen Orthologs with Tethered Inhibitors as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategy for cancer and infectious diseases with Dr. Timothy Haystead.
2. RyanWelch
Purpose:
1. To discuss the politicization
and corruption of climate
science based on evidence
presented in the books by A.W.
Montford and Larry Bell.
2. Agenda-based bias in climate
science publications as
exposed by the Climategate
emails.
3. Flaws in journal peer review
process as exposed by the
hoax papers submitted by
Peter Boghossian, Helen
Pluckrose, and James Lindsay.
2
3. RyanWelch
Importance: Money
The federal government has spent
more than $154 billion on climate-
change-related activities since 1993
• According to the U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO) Federal
funding for climate change research,
technology, assistance, and
adaptation has increased from $2.4
billion in 1993 to $13.2 billion in
2017, with an additional $26.1 billion
for climate change programs and
activities provided by the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act in
2009
3
4. RyanWelch
Importance: Policy Consequences
The sweeping "Green New Deal“
could cost as much as $93 trillion, or
approximately $600,000 per
household.
• Jobs: According to researchers at the
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Spain,
every green job eliminates 2.2 existing
jobs.
• Blackouts: Converting reliable power to
unreliable renewable power production
is already causing blackouts.
• Costs: Renewable energy increases the
cost of electricity to some consumers by
50% - 500%.
4
5. RyanWelch
Politicization of
Climate
The Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change
• The politicization of climate began with the
creation of a separate climate bureaucracy
under the World Meterological Organization
(WMO) in 1977.
• The WMO and the UN created the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) in 1988, which is political body, and
does not conduct any research.
• IPCC’s History webpage states that their
purpose is “understanding the scientific basis
of risk of HUMAN-INDUCED climate change.”
• The IPPC is mandated to find evidence that
climate change is due to “HUMAN” activity,
for government and political action.
5
6. RyanWelch
The Hockey Stick Illusion
Nature published a research paper in
1998 Authored by Michael Mann, Ray
Bradley, and Malcom Hughes
(MBH98)
• MBH98 was a temperature reconstruction
study taken from various proxies (blue)
spliced with modern temperature data (red).
• The graph from MBH98 became the icon of
the Global Warming agenda and is known as
the “Hockey Stick” graph for its straight
handle and sharply upward turning blade on
the end.
• The Hockey Stick graph temperature
reconstruction contrasted with Figure 7.1c
from the IPCC’s First Assessment Report
(FAR) published in 1990. 6
7. What Happened to the Medieval Warm
(MWP) Period and the Little Ice Age (LIA)?
7
If the earth’s climate changed naturally then the IPCC could not
blame temperature changes on “HUMAN-INDUCED climate change”
therefore, there was a motive to remove or minimize those well-
known events.
Evidence:
David Deming, a University of Oklahoma borehole expert wrote, “With the
publication of [my] article in Science, I gained credibility in the community of
scientists working on climate change. They thought I was one of them, someone
who would pervert science in the service of social and political causes. A major
person working on the area of climate change and global warming sent me an
email that said, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.””
8. RyanWelch
8
What Happened to the Medieval Warm
(MWP) Period and the Little Ice Age (LIA)?
Evidence
Continued:
Jonathan Overpeck wrote this in an email to Keith Briffa, “I get the sense that I’m
not the only one who would like to deal a mortal blow to the misuse of supposed
warm period terms and myths in the literature.”
Keith Briffa, a climatologist and deputy director of the Climatic Research Unit
(CRU), wrote in an email, “I know there is pressure to present a nice tidy story as
regards apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the
proxy data but the reality of the situation is not quite so simple.”
9. RyanWelch
What are the Climategate emails?
• In November of 2009 someone with
access to the computer servers of the
Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the
University of East Anglia in Norwich,
England, posted over 1000 emails from
the most influential climate researchers
and vast quantities of data, including the
code from the HADCRUT temperature
index and posted the data in a Russian
server.
• The scientists exposed in email dump
have authored/co-authored many of the
studies relied on by the UN IPCC, and
world governments. The studies have
been used to pronounce global warming
an immediate and catastrophic threat. 9
10. What did the Climategate emails reveal?
10
1. Scientists colluded in efforts to thwart Freedom of Information Act
requests. They reference deleting data, hiding source code from
requests, manipulating data to make it more annoying to use, and
attempting to deny requests from people recognized as contributors to
specific internet sites.
2. Scientists discussed black-balling journals that published opposing
views and preventing opposing views from being published in journals
they controlled. They used pressure to remove journal editors from their
positions if they allowed skeptical science to be published. They
mention changing the rules midstream in areas they control to ensure
opposing views would not see the light of day. They discuss amongst
themselves which scientists can be trusted and who should be excluded
from having data because they may not be “predictable”.
11. RyanWelch
11
What did the Climategate emails reveal?
3. Scientists expressed concern privately over a lack of increase in global
temperatures in the last decade, and the fact that they could not explain this.
Publicly they discounted it as simple natural variations. In one instance, data
was [apparently] manipulated to hide a decline in temperatures when graphed.
Other discussions included ways to discount historic warming trends that
inconveniently did not occur during increases in atmospheric CO2.
4. The emails show examples of top scientists working to create public
relations messaging with favorable news outlets. It shows them identifying
and cataloging, by name and association, people with opposing views. These
people are then disparaged in a coordinated fashion via favorable online
communities.
5. Media members admitted that they helped to promote man-made global
warming stories while they spiked stories attributing some warming to natural
causes.
12. RyanWelch
Climategate emails, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0
• Climategate 2.0 - On November 22,
2011, FOIA.org produced an enormous
zip file of 5,000 additional emails similar
to those released in 2009. There are
almost 1/4 million additional emails
locked behind a password, which the
organization did not release.
• Climategate 3.0 - On March 13, 2013 it
was announced that another 220,000
emails were released hidden behind a
password provided by an anonymous
source known as “Mr. FOIA.”
• Climategate 4.0 - On March 4, 2019 after
years of trying to suppress their release,
the emails from Michael Mann while at
the University of Arizona were ordered
to be released by a judge. 12
13. RyanWelch
13
Climategate Email Evidence of
Corruption
• An email from Michael Mann says, “Can you delete any emails you may have had with
Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise. Can you email Gene and get him to do the same?
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.”
• An email from Keith Briffa says, “Finally, might I ask that you note and then erase this
email. I have found that recent enquiries under the Freedom of Information Act, or Data
Protection Act, can become considerable time sinks, or the basis of some inconvenient
subsequent distractions.”
Scientists colluded in efforts to thwart Freedom of Information Act (FOI) requests
• An email from Phil Jones says, “[Keith Briffa and Tom Osborn] are still getting FOI
requests as well as [the Hadley Center at the Met Office and the University of Reading].
All our FOI officers have been in discussion and are now using the same exceptions not
to respond – advice they got from the Information Commissioner… The…line we’re all
using is this. IPCC is exempt from any country’s FOI – the skeptics have been told this.”
• Phil Jones wrote, “If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act here now in the
UK, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send it to anyone.”
14. RyanWelch
14
Climategate Email Evidence of
Corruption
• Tom Wigley who was the director of the CRU wrote that we, “must get rid of von Storch
too.” Von Storch was an editor of the Climate Research Journal. Wigley suggested, “we
could get a large group of highly credentialed scientists to sign such a letter”….
“otherwise holes will be filled up with people like Legates, Lindzen, Michaels, Singer* etc.”
(*a list of skeptical scientists)
• An email from Tom Wigley says, “If you think that Saiers is in the greenhouse sceptics
camp, then, if we can find documentary evidence of this, we could go through official
AGU channels, to get him ousted.”
Scientists exerted pressure to remove journal editors from their positions if they
allowed skeptical science to be published
• An email from Michael Mann to Phil Jones says, “Whilst we do not know who reviewed
the Soon/Baliunas manuscript, there is sufficient evidence in my view to justify a "loss of
confidence" in the peer review process operated by the journal and hence a mass
resignation of review editors may be warranted.”
15. RyanWelch
15
Climategate Email Evidence of
Corruption
• An email from Phil Jones says, “I've just completed Mike's Nature [journal] trick of adding
in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie., from 1981 onwards) and from
1961 for Keith's to hide the decline.”
Scientists discuss the lack of increase in temperatures with rising CO2, the
manipulation of data to hide a decline in temperatures, and discount historic
warm periods that did not occur during increases in atmospheric CO2.
• An email from Kevin Trenberth says, “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of
warming at the moment, and it is a travesty that we can’t….the data is surely wrong.”
• An email from Ed Cook to Keith Briffa says, “Here is the Oroko Swamp RCS chronology
plot in an attached Word 98 file and actual data values below. It certainly looks pretty
spooky to me with strong "Medieval Warm Period" and "Little Ice Age" signals in it. It's
based on substantially more replication than the series in the paper you have to review
(hint, hint!).”
16. RyanWelch
16
Climategate Email Evidence of
CorruptionScientists colluding with the media to print only the types of stories they want
and using friendly press to attack sceptics.
• In this email from Phil Jones, he brags about getting the BBC World Service to kill further
stories that showed evidence of natural climate change after they already published one.
"I managed to stop the World Service doing anything on this [type of story] (see below).“
"Oh Phil, what can I say? ... All I can say is I'm sorry ... -- I hope you'll still talk to me
despite this."
• An email from Ray Bradley says, “If you are willing, a quick and forceful statement from
The Distinguished CRU boys would help quash further arguments, although here, at least,
it is already quite out of control...”
• An email from Michael Mann says, “Let’s let our supporters in higher places use our
scientific response to push the broader case against [McIntyre and McKittrick].”
17. RyanWelch
Flaws in the peer review process primarily
come in two forms. The first is
gatekeeping to keep papers that don’t
conform to current ideological beliefs out
of publication, as exposed in the
Climategate emails.
The second is publishing flawed science or
even hoax papers that appear to conform
to current ideological beliefs. The most
infamous of these hoax papers is known
as the Sokal affair where Alan Sokal, a
physics professor at New York University
submitted a hoax article to Social Text in
1996.
17
Problems with Peer Review
18. 18
Seven of the hoax papers were accepted at peer-reviewed journals, including
"Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to
Neoliberal and Choice Feminism," composed of passages of Hitler’s Mein Kampf
rewritten as a theoretical argument about social justice. Their first hoax paper
was about the culture of dog rape at dog parks titled "Human Reactions to Rape
Culture and Queer Performativity at the Dog Park.” During the initial peer review
for its second and ultimately successful attempt at publication in Gender, Place &
Culture, the paper was praised by the first reviewer as "incredibly innovative, rich
in analysis, and extremely well-written and organized".
In 2017 Helen Pluckrose, the editor of the online magazine Areo,
James A. Lindsay, a Ph.D. in math, and Peter Boghossian, an
assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University,
submitted 20 fake papers to peer reviewed journals to expose a
lack of scientific rigor in the peer review process. This hoax is now
known as "Sokal Squared.”
Sokal
Squared
19. RyanWelch
Conclusion:
This presentation is just a tiny
fraction of the evidence presented in
the books by A.W. Montford and
Larry Bell. It also cannot fully discuss
the 250,000 climategate emails, let
alone the numerous other books and
articles that show bias and
corruption in climate change
scientists, but it should be enough to
create doubt in the minds of the
readers to be skeptical of climate
change science. They cannot be
trusted to produce truthful science,
let alone to persuade our
government to tax and spend $93
19