SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Local Government
Investment Pool/U.S.
Credit Analysis
City of Oakland Operating Fund
Ratings
Summary
The City of Oakland Operating Fund is rated ‘AAA/V1+’ by Fitch Ratings. The fund’s
‘AAA’ rating reflects the high credit quality of the portfolio assets, a conservative
investment policy, and appropriate management oversight and operational
capabilities. The fund’s ‘V1+’ volatility rating reflects low market risk and a capacity
to return stable principal value meeting anticipated cash needs of the city and the
Port of Oakland, even in adverse interest rate environments. Portfolio valuation
reports are submitted to Fitch on a monthly basis.
Rating Considerations
 The fund is invested mainly in U.S. government agency securities, as well as
certificates of deposit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
or overcollateralized by the U.S. government agency securities.
Security Class
Current
Ratings
City of Oakland Operating
Fund AAA/V1+
Analysts
Viktoria Baklanova, CFA
+1 212 908-9162
viktoria.baklanova@fitchratings.com
Daniel Rodriguez
+1 212 908-9177
daniel.rodriguez@fitchratings.com
 Overnight liquidity is maintained by investing up to 20% of the fund’s assets in
registered money market funds rated ‘AAA’ by Fitch or of comparable quality by
other global rating agencies. In addition, the fund invests in the Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF), which is a local government investment pool managed by
the state of California’s treasurer. Exposure to LAIF is limited to $40 million, or
18.5% of the fund’s assets, as of Aug. 31, 2009.
 The fund has an adequate level of liquidity resulting from the predictable nature
of cash flows and portfolio asset maturity profile.
 The fund has appropriate management oversight and operational controls.
Overview
The city of Oakland is located in northern California. The City of Oakland Operating
Fund is a surplus fund consisting of the unexpended fund balances of the city and Port
of Oakland. As of Aug. 31, 2009, the fund had approximately $216.3 million in assets.
The fund is organized in accordance with the state of California Government Code
Section 53607 and is not registered under federal law. The city’s treasurer is
authorized by the City Council to manage the fund’s assets, pursuant to the city of
Oakland’s investment policy.
The fund’s first and primary goal is the preservation of capital. Per the fund’s
investment policy, investments shall be made with the aim of avoiding losses due to
credit and market risk. The fund seeks to maintain an adequate level of liquidity to
meet projected cash flow needs through maturing investments. The fund’s third
objective is maximization of yield as is consistent with the primary goal.
www.fitchratings.com October 26, 2009
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
2 City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009
Investment Practices
Portfolio Composition
The fund seeks to pursue its investment objectives by investing mainly in U.S.
government agency securities, as well as certificates of deposit insured by the FDIC or
overcollateralized by the U.S. government agency securities. Other investments
permitted under the fund’s investment policy include direct bank obligations, such as
certificates of deposit and bankers’ acceptances; commercial paper; corporate notes;
repurchase agreements; money market mutual funds; and LAIF. Per the fund’s
investment policy, permitted securities must be rated at least ‘A+/F1’ by Fitch or of a
comparable credit quality by other global ratings agencies.
By its investment policy, the fund may invest in repurchase agreements with
counterparties rated at least ‘A+/F1’ by Fitch or of a comparable credit quality by
other global ratings agency and overcollatralized by at least 102%. Repurchase
agreement collateral is restricted to the U.S. government agency securities. As of
Aug. 31, 2009, the fund did not have any investments in repurchase agreements.
As of Aug. 31, 2009, the pool invested approximately 62.6% of its total assets in U.S.
government agency securities, 18.5% in money market funds, 18.5% in LAIF, and 0.4% in
collateralized certificates of deposit.
The fund’s investment policy permits
investments in government agency
callable step-up and floating-rate
securities tied to a short-term index.
Securities tied to long-term or lagged
indexes, such as the Cost of Funds
Index, or residual interest securities
are not eligible for portfolio
investments. The fund may enter into
reverse-repurchase agreements with
broker/dealers for purposes of
temporary borrowing to meet
unanticipated cash outflow. No such
agreements have been used during
the past year.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
9/07
10/07
11/07
12/07
1/08
2/08
3/08
4/08
5/08
6/08
7/08
8/08
9/08
10/08
11/08
12/08
1/09
2/09
3/09
4/09
5/09
6/09
7/09
8/09
Portfolio Weighted Average Maturity
(As of Aug. 31, 2009)
(Days)
FFCB
1.4%
Certificates
of Deposit
0.4%
MMF
18.5%
FHLMC
28.7%
FHLB
15.6%
FNMA
16.9%
LAIF
18.5%
City of Oakland Operating Fund
(As of Aug. 31, 2009)
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Market Risk
The weighted-average maturity (WAM) of securities held in the portfolio was
approximately 165 days as of Aug. 31, 2009. WAM is a measure of a portfolio’s sensitivity
to changing interest rates. By policy, the fund must maintain a WAM of less than 540 days
or 1.5 years, with no single asset maturity in excess of five years. As of that same date,
approximately 86% of the pool’s total assets were invested in securities having maturities
of one year or less.
Both the current and maximum WAM of the fund are significantly longer than what
Fitch traditionally deems consistent with a ‘V1+’ volatility rating assigned to local
government investment funds managed within the parameters of money market funds
governed by Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. That
said, what mitigates the potential liquidity risk for the City of Oakland Operating Fund
is that the portfolio has historically benefited from highly predictable cash outflow
needs of the city and port, which are the only two captive participants of the fund.
The pool’s anticipated redemptions include payroll and benefit payments, accounts
payable, debt services, and other planned expenditures. Furthermore, the city’s
treasurer has some ability to control cash outflows by delaying projects or lowering
other expenses, if warranted.
By its investment policy, the fund is prohibited from investments in structured notes,
inverse floaters, range notes, and interest-only strips derived from a pool of mortgages.
0
10
20
30
40
Overnight 2-7 Days 8-30 Days 31-60 Days 61-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-270 Days 270+ Days
(% of Total Assets)
Asset Maturity Distribution
(As of Aug. 31, 2009)
Leverage
The fund does not currently engage in reverse-repurchase agreements, although
reverse-repurchase agreements are approved under the pool’s investment policy. The
ability to use reverse-repurchase agreements is retained only as a source of liquidity
due to unanticipated cash flow requirements. The fund did not make use of the
program during the past year. By the fund’s investment policy, reverse-repurchase
agreements are limited to 20% of the portfolio’s total assets and must have a maturity
of 92 days or less.
Liquid Management
The fund’s cash flows are forecast by the city of Oakland’s treasurer’s office each month
for the following one-year period. The basis for this forecast is the prior year’s cash flows,
with additional consideration given to identifiable changes in the forecast period. The
historically observed stability of cash outflows is based on the fund’s composition, which
has no other participants but the city, port, and redevelopment agency. By the fund’s
City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009 3
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
4 City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009
policy, cash needs to meet cash disbursements and payroll must be covered through
maturing investments. Cash flow projections are an integral part of the overall cash
management responsibilities of the treasurer’s office.
The fund meets its liquidity needs by investing in maturity-matching eligible securities.
In addition, the fund maintains a portion of its net assets in overnight investments,
such as money market funds and LAIF, to provide additional sources of liquidity to
meet daily cash outflows. As of Aug. 31, 2009, 45.5% of the fund’s portfolio assets
matured within 30 days. Finally, the pool maintains a significant position
(approximately 62.6% of total assets) in the U.S. government agency securities that
are expected to demonstrate secondary market liquidity even during periods of
market stress.
Credit Quality
The fund manages its credit risk exposure by investing mainly in the U.S. government
agency securities. Other permitted investments must be rated at least ‘A+/F1’ by
Fitch or of a comparable credit quality by other global rating agencies. The fund’s
investment policy mandates a sufficient level of diversification with maximum
exposure to a single corporate issuer not exceeding 5%, with the exception of
investments in the U.S. government agency securities, money market funds, and LAIF.
Repurchase agreements are entered into only with highly rated counterparties and
must be fully collateralized by the U.S. government securities. As of Aug. 31, 2009,
92% of the portfolio was invested in ‘AAA’ quality U.S. agency securities and money
market funds. The fund’s custodian, Wells Fargo Bank, holds investments on its behalf.
An investment oversight committee composed of representatives of the City Council
and the public, reviews the pool’s investment practices and policies on an annual
basis. The committee is required to initiate the performance of an annual audit to
ensure compliance with established investment policies.
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS
AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS.
IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE
AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT,
CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE.
Copyright © 2009 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY
10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in
whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. All of the information contained
herein is based on information obtained from issuers, other obligors, underwriters, and other sources which
Fitch believes to be reliable. Fitch does not audit or verify the truth or accuracy of any such information.
As a result, the information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any
kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. The rating does not address the
risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged
in the offer or sale of any security. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute
for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection
with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn at anytime for any reason
in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a
recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market
price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of
payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other
obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from USD1,000 to USD750,000 (or
the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues
issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single
annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from USD10,000 to USD1,500,000 (or the applicable currency
equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent
by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United
States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of Great Britain, or the securities laws
of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch
research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009 5

More Related Content

What's hot

Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16
Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16
Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16Saskia Ahmad
 
Canada Jetlines October 2021 Investor Deck
Canada Jetlines October 2021 Investor DeckCanada Jetlines October 2021 Investor Deck
Canada Jetlines October 2021 Investor DeckThe Howard Group Inc.
 
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation Zep Inc.
 
Pathway Health Corp November 2021 Company Presentation
Pathway Health Corp November 2021 Company PresentationPathway Health Corp November 2021 Company Presentation
Pathway Health Corp November 2021 Company PresentationThe Howard Group Inc.
 
Nrb directives and their compliance
Nrb directives and their complianceNrb directives and their compliance
Nrb directives and their compliancePrakriti Karki
 
Directives -unified directives -2067 _english (1)
Directives -unified  directives -2067 _english (1)Directives -unified  directives -2067 _english (1)
Directives -unified directives -2067 _english (1)Alok Joshi
 
NFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank Directives
NFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank DirectivesNFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank Directives
NFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank DirectivesDev Mukunda
 
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)David Merkur
 
OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19
OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19
OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19Welltower
 
Pyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund I
Pyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund IPyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund I
Pyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund IAlan Chu
 
Authorised investment funds technical release 2012
Authorised investment funds technical release 2012Authorised investment funds technical release 2012
Authorised investment funds technical release 2012Grant Thornton
 
BANC 4Q18 Earnings Presentation
BANC 4Q18 Earnings PresentationBANC 4Q18 Earnings Presentation
BANC 4Q18 Earnings PresentationBancofCalifornia
 
Harrisburg School District 2013 Financial Statements
Harrisburg School District 2013 Financial StatementsHarrisburg School District 2013 Financial Statements
Harrisburg School District 2013 Financial Statementstodaysthedayhbg
 
New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)
New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)
New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)Charlesp
 
Freddie Mac Security Analysis
Freddie Mac Security Analysis Freddie Mac Security Analysis
Freddie Mac Security Analysis Arvin Khorram
 
Promoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law Group
Promoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law GroupPromoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law Group
Promoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law GroupThe 401k Study Group ®
 
The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11
The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11
The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11Frank McEnulty
 

What's hot (20)

Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16
Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16
Solution Manual Advanced Financial Accounting by Baker 9th Edition Chapter 16
 
Canada Jetlines October 2021 Investor Deck
Canada Jetlines October 2021 Investor DeckCanada Jetlines October 2021 Investor Deck
Canada Jetlines October 2021 Investor Deck
 
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
 
Pathway Health Corp November 2021 Company Presentation
Pathway Health Corp November 2021 Company PresentationPathway Health Corp November 2021 Company Presentation
Pathway Health Corp November 2021 Company Presentation
 
Nrb directives and their compliance
Nrb directives and their complianceNrb directives and their compliance
Nrb directives and their compliance
 
Directives -unified directives -2067 _english (1)
Directives -unified  directives -2067 _english (1)Directives -unified  directives -2067 _english (1)
Directives -unified directives -2067 _english (1)
 
NFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank Directives
NFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank DirectivesNFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank Directives
NFRS vs Nepal Rastra Bank Directives
 
4Q 2018 Earnings Conference Call Presentation
4Q 2018 Earnings Conference Call Presentation 4Q 2018 Earnings Conference Call Presentation
4Q 2018 Earnings Conference Call Presentation
 
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation (Nov. 2020)
 
OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19
OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19
OM Acquisition Update 11-12-19
 
Pyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund I
Pyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund IPyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund I
Pyatt Broadmark Investor Presentation Fund I
 
Authorised investment funds technical release 2012
Authorised investment funds technical release 2012Authorised investment funds technical release 2012
Authorised investment funds technical release 2012
 
BANC 4Q18 Earnings Presentation
BANC 4Q18 Earnings PresentationBANC 4Q18 Earnings Presentation
BANC 4Q18 Earnings Presentation
 
Unit 8- Sources of Business Finance-1 - Inter - Commerce
Unit 8- Sources of Business Finance-1 - Inter - CommerceUnit 8- Sources of Business Finance-1 - Inter - Commerce
Unit 8- Sources of Business Finance-1 - Inter - Commerce
 
Harrisburg School District 2013 Financial Statements
Harrisburg School District 2013 Financial StatementsHarrisburg School District 2013 Financial Statements
Harrisburg School District 2013 Financial Statements
 
New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)
New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)
New Co Growth Plan (June 2009)
 
Freddie Mac Security Analysis
Freddie Mac Security Analysis Freddie Mac Security Analysis
Freddie Mac Security Analysis
 
Promoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law Group
Promoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law GroupPromoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law Group
Promoting & Evaluating The Success of Your Plan | The Wagner Law Group
 
Cdlaf Presentation April Rework
Cdlaf Presentation April ReworkCdlaf Presentation April Rework
Cdlaf Presentation April Rework
 
The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11
The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11
The HomeOwners Fund II PPM - Final 2-16-11
 

Viewers also liked

Herramientas Digitales
Herramientas DigitalesHerramientas Digitales
Herramientas DigitalesFabiiola Lopez
 
Social media changing the structures of everyday life
Social media changing the structures of everyday lifeSocial media changing the structures of everyday life
Social media changing the structures of everyday lifeKoen Delvaux
 
專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒
專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒
專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒Boru Chen
 
Growth Hacking learnings from Proximus Move
Growth Hacking learnings from Proximus MoveGrowth Hacking learnings from Proximus Move
Growth Hacking learnings from Proximus MoveKoen Delvaux
 
Psicologia de la personalidad2
Psicologia de la personalidad2Psicologia de la personalidad2
Psicologia de la personalidad2SaraGonzalez1505
 
Deploying apps with Docker and Kubernetes
Deploying apps with Docker and KubernetesDeploying apps with Docker and Kubernetes
Deploying apps with Docker and KubernetesDaniel Fenton
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Herramientas Digitales
Herramientas DigitalesHerramientas Digitales
Herramientas Digitales
 
Social media changing the structures of everyday life
Social media changing the structures of everyday lifeSocial media changing the structures of everyday life
Social media changing the structures of everyday life
 
專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒
專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒
專欄簡報 22127陳柏儒
 
Growth Hacking learnings from Proximus Move
Growth Hacking learnings from Proximus MoveGrowth Hacking learnings from Proximus Move
Growth Hacking learnings from Proximus Move
 
Psicologia de la personalidad2
Psicologia de la personalidad2Psicologia de la personalidad2
Psicologia de la personalidad2
 
Deploying apps with Docker and Kubernetes
Deploying apps with Docker and KubernetesDeploying apps with Docker and Kubernetes
Deploying apps with Docker and Kubernetes
 

Similar to City of Oakland Operating Fund

PowerPoint Supplement for PPM
PowerPoint Supplement for PPMPowerPoint Supplement for PPM
PowerPoint Supplement for PPMMinda Johnstone
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...Pegasus Property Funds™
 
San Luis Obispo County Investment Pool
San Luis Obispo County Investment PoolSan Luis Obispo County Investment Pool
San Luis Obispo County Investment PoolDaniel Rodriguez
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...Pegasus Property Funds™
 
TITAN by AlphaFlow
TITAN by AlphaFlowTITAN by AlphaFlow
TITAN by AlphaFlowRay Sturm
 
Everyday Capital, LLC Term Sheet
Everyday Capital, LLC Term SheetEveryday Capital, LLC Term Sheet
Everyday Capital, LLC Term SheetEverydayCapitalLLC
 
Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal Risks
Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal RisksHedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal Risks
Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal RisksDuff & Phelps
 
Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)
Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)
Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)VirtuaGod
 
Tax efficient charitable_giving
Tax efficient charitable_givingTax efficient charitable_giving
Tax efficient charitable_givingmichaelmorris123
 
White Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan Investments
White Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan InvestmentsWhite Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan Investments
White Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan InvestmentsMHM (Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.)
 
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016Pegasus Property Funds™
 
Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21
Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21
Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21IDFCJUBI
 
IDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentation
IDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentationIDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentation
IDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentationTesssttest
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...Pegasus Property Funds™
 
Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1
Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1
Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1Andy Varoshiotis
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...Pegasus Property Funds™
 
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation
Ladder Capital - Investor PresentationLadder Capital - Investor Presentation
Ladder Capital - Investor PresentationDavid Merkur
 

Similar to City of Oakland Operating Fund (20)

PowerPoint Supplement for PPM
PowerPoint Supplement for PPMPowerPoint Supplement for PPM
PowerPoint Supplement for PPM
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
 
San Luis Obispo County Investment Pool
San Luis Obispo County Investment PoolSan Luis Obispo County Investment Pool
San Luis Obispo County Investment Pool
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) I-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
 
Fund overview
Fund overviewFund overview
Fund overview
 
TITAN by AlphaFlow
TITAN by AlphaFlowTITAN by AlphaFlow
TITAN by AlphaFlow
 
Everyday Capital, LLC Term Sheet
Everyday Capital, LLC Term SheetEveryday Capital, LLC Term Sheet
Everyday Capital, LLC Term Sheet
 
Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal Risks
Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal RisksHedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal Risks
Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund - Structures, Regulation and Criminal Risks
 
Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)
Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)
Rolling Return S&P 500 (5 and 10 year)
 
Tax efficient charitable_giving
Tax efficient charitable_givingTax efficient charitable_giving
Tax efficient charitable_giving
 
White Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan Investments
White Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan InvestmentsWhite Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan Investments
White Paper: A Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Plan Investments
 
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) I-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
 
The Hedge Fund Advantage
The Hedge Fund AdvantageThe Hedge Fund Advantage
The Hedge Fund Advantage
 
Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21
Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21
Presentation on-idfc-floating-rate-fund feb-21
 
IDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentation
IDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentationIDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentation
IDFC Floating Rate Fund_Fund presentation
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JUNE...
 
Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1
Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1
Harvest Stargate Fund Version ENF1
 
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
PPF ECUADOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FUND (ERCP) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY...
 
Asset Owners
Asset OwnersAsset Owners
Asset Owners
 
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation
Ladder Capital - Investor PresentationLadder Capital - Investor Presentation
Ladder Capital - Investor Presentation
 

City of Oakland Operating Fund

  • 1. Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group Local Government Investment Pool/U.S. Credit Analysis City of Oakland Operating Fund Ratings Summary The City of Oakland Operating Fund is rated ‘AAA/V1+’ by Fitch Ratings. The fund’s ‘AAA’ rating reflects the high credit quality of the portfolio assets, a conservative investment policy, and appropriate management oversight and operational capabilities. The fund’s ‘V1+’ volatility rating reflects low market risk and a capacity to return stable principal value meeting anticipated cash needs of the city and the Port of Oakland, even in adverse interest rate environments. Portfolio valuation reports are submitted to Fitch on a monthly basis. Rating Considerations  The fund is invested mainly in U.S. government agency securities, as well as certificates of deposit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or overcollateralized by the U.S. government agency securities. Security Class Current Ratings City of Oakland Operating Fund AAA/V1+ Analysts Viktoria Baklanova, CFA +1 212 908-9162 viktoria.baklanova@fitchratings.com Daniel Rodriguez +1 212 908-9177 daniel.rodriguez@fitchratings.com  Overnight liquidity is maintained by investing up to 20% of the fund’s assets in registered money market funds rated ‘AAA’ by Fitch or of comparable quality by other global rating agencies. In addition, the fund invests in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), which is a local government investment pool managed by the state of California’s treasurer. Exposure to LAIF is limited to $40 million, or 18.5% of the fund’s assets, as of Aug. 31, 2009.  The fund has an adequate level of liquidity resulting from the predictable nature of cash flows and portfolio asset maturity profile.  The fund has appropriate management oversight and operational controls. Overview The city of Oakland is located in northern California. The City of Oakland Operating Fund is a surplus fund consisting of the unexpended fund balances of the city and Port of Oakland. As of Aug. 31, 2009, the fund had approximately $216.3 million in assets. The fund is organized in accordance with the state of California Government Code Section 53607 and is not registered under federal law. The city’s treasurer is authorized by the City Council to manage the fund’s assets, pursuant to the city of Oakland’s investment policy. The fund’s first and primary goal is the preservation of capital. Per the fund’s investment policy, investments shall be made with the aim of avoiding losses due to credit and market risk. The fund seeks to maintain an adequate level of liquidity to meet projected cash flow needs through maturing investments. The fund’s third objective is maximization of yield as is consistent with the primary goal. www.fitchratings.com October 26, 2009
  • 2. Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group 2 City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009 Investment Practices Portfolio Composition The fund seeks to pursue its investment objectives by investing mainly in U.S. government agency securities, as well as certificates of deposit insured by the FDIC or overcollateralized by the U.S. government agency securities. Other investments permitted under the fund’s investment policy include direct bank obligations, such as certificates of deposit and bankers’ acceptances; commercial paper; corporate notes; repurchase agreements; money market mutual funds; and LAIF. Per the fund’s investment policy, permitted securities must be rated at least ‘A+/F1’ by Fitch or of a comparable credit quality by other global ratings agencies. By its investment policy, the fund may invest in repurchase agreements with counterparties rated at least ‘A+/F1’ by Fitch or of a comparable credit quality by other global ratings agency and overcollatralized by at least 102%. Repurchase agreement collateral is restricted to the U.S. government agency securities. As of Aug. 31, 2009, the fund did not have any investments in repurchase agreements. As of Aug. 31, 2009, the pool invested approximately 62.6% of its total assets in U.S. government agency securities, 18.5% in money market funds, 18.5% in LAIF, and 0.4% in collateralized certificates of deposit. The fund’s investment policy permits investments in government agency callable step-up and floating-rate securities tied to a short-term index. Securities tied to long-term or lagged indexes, such as the Cost of Funds Index, or residual interest securities are not eligible for portfolio investments. The fund may enter into reverse-repurchase agreements with broker/dealers for purposes of temporary borrowing to meet unanticipated cash outflow. No such agreements have been used during the past year. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 9/07 10/07 11/07 12/07 1/08 2/08 3/08 4/08 5/08 6/08 7/08 8/08 9/08 10/08 11/08 12/08 1/09 2/09 3/09 4/09 5/09 6/09 7/09 8/09 Portfolio Weighted Average Maturity (As of Aug. 31, 2009) (Days) FFCB 1.4% Certificates of Deposit 0.4% MMF 18.5% FHLMC 28.7% FHLB 15.6% FNMA 16.9% LAIF 18.5% City of Oakland Operating Fund (As of Aug. 31, 2009)
  • 3. Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group Market Risk The weighted-average maturity (WAM) of securities held in the portfolio was approximately 165 days as of Aug. 31, 2009. WAM is a measure of a portfolio’s sensitivity to changing interest rates. By policy, the fund must maintain a WAM of less than 540 days or 1.5 years, with no single asset maturity in excess of five years. As of that same date, approximately 86% of the pool’s total assets were invested in securities having maturities of one year or less. Both the current and maximum WAM of the fund are significantly longer than what Fitch traditionally deems consistent with a ‘V1+’ volatility rating assigned to local government investment funds managed within the parameters of money market funds governed by Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. That said, what mitigates the potential liquidity risk for the City of Oakland Operating Fund is that the portfolio has historically benefited from highly predictable cash outflow needs of the city and port, which are the only two captive participants of the fund. The pool’s anticipated redemptions include payroll and benefit payments, accounts payable, debt services, and other planned expenditures. Furthermore, the city’s treasurer has some ability to control cash outflows by delaying projects or lowering other expenses, if warranted. By its investment policy, the fund is prohibited from investments in structured notes, inverse floaters, range notes, and interest-only strips derived from a pool of mortgages. 0 10 20 30 40 Overnight 2-7 Days 8-30 Days 31-60 Days 61-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-270 Days 270+ Days (% of Total Assets) Asset Maturity Distribution (As of Aug. 31, 2009) Leverage The fund does not currently engage in reverse-repurchase agreements, although reverse-repurchase agreements are approved under the pool’s investment policy. The ability to use reverse-repurchase agreements is retained only as a source of liquidity due to unanticipated cash flow requirements. The fund did not make use of the program during the past year. By the fund’s investment policy, reverse-repurchase agreements are limited to 20% of the portfolio’s total assets and must have a maturity of 92 days or less. Liquid Management The fund’s cash flows are forecast by the city of Oakland’s treasurer’s office each month for the following one-year period. The basis for this forecast is the prior year’s cash flows, with additional consideration given to identifiable changes in the forecast period. The historically observed stability of cash outflows is based on the fund’s composition, which has no other participants but the city, port, and redevelopment agency. By the fund’s City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009 3
  • 4. Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group 4 City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009 policy, cash needs to meet cash disbursements and payroll must be covered through maturing investments. Cash flow projections are an integral part of the overall cash management responsibilities of the treasurer’s office. The fund meets its liquidity needs by investing in maturity-matching eligible securities. In addition, the fund maintains a portion of its net assets in overnight investments, such as money market funds and LAIF, to provide additional sources of liquidity to meet daily cash outflows. As of Aug. 31, 2009, 45.5% of the fund’s portfolio assets matured within 30 days. Finally, the pool maintains a significant position (approximately 62.6% of total assets) in the U.S. government agency securities that are expected to demonstrate secondary market liquidity even during periods of market stress. Credit Quality The fund manages its credit risk exposure by investing mainly in the U.S. government agency securities. Other permitted investments must be rated at least ‘A+/F1’ by Fitch or of a comparable credit quality by other global rating agencies. The fund’s investment policy mandates a sufficient level of diversification with maximum exposure to a single corporate issuer not exceeding 5%, with the exception of investments in the U.S. government agency securities, money market funds, and LAIF. Repurchase agreements are entered into only with highly rated counterparties and must be fully collateralized by the U.S. government securities. As of Aug. 31, 2009, 92% of the portfolio was invested in ‘AAA’ quality U.S. agency securities and money market funds. The fund’s custodian, Wells Fargo Bank, holds investments on its behalf. An investment oversight committee composed of representatives of the City Council and the public, reviews the pool’s investment practices and policies on an annual basis. The committee is required to initiate the performance of an annual audit to ensure compliance with established investment policies.
  • 5. Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. Copyright © 2009 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY 10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. All of the information contained herein is based on information obtained from issuers, other obligors, underwriters, and other sources which Fitch believes to be reliable. Fitch does not audit or verify the truth or accuracy of any such information. As a result, the information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from USD1,000 to USD750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from USD10,000 to USD1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of Great Britain, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. City of Oakland Operating Fund October 26, 2009 5