SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Measuring Product “Coolness” – 
Developing a Measurement Instrument 
Abstract 
Cool products provide a leap in value and they increase 
a company’s market share. The widespread adoption of 
iOS and Android devices resulted in a radical change in 
the role of technology in people’s lives. And anecdotally 
people exclaimed about how “cool” their devices were; 
“I can’t go back” to what I had before and “I can’t stop 
talking about it—it’s so cool!” 
In 2010 InContext Design launched The Cool Project1 to 
understand the underlying principles, which make a 
product “cool.” The research goal was to discover the 
core drivers of the cool user experience. This consumer 
research used qualitative research to identify seven 
core constructs associated with “coolness” that 
appeared independently of device or software or even 
technology product. In 2011 SAP became interested in 
developing a metric to measure “coolness” and in a 
joint research effort with InContext Design validated 
the constructs with business users and co-designed a 
cool metric. The final result is a repeatable process for 
measuring cool through a quick survey, the results of 
which provide implications to product teams on how to 
improve their products to increase “coolness”. 
1 See Interactions Volume 18 Issue 6, November + December 
2011, Pages 40-47, for overview of The Cool Project and the 
Cool Concepts. See also http://bit.ly/vTBmEy 
Carol Farnsworth 
SAP Labs, LLC 
3410 Hillview Avenue 
Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA 
carol.farnsworth@sap.com 
Karen Holtzblatt 
InContext Design 
2352 Main Street, Suite 302 
Concord, MA 01742 USA 
karen@incontextdesign.com 
Shantanu Pai 
SAP Labs, LLC 
3410 Hillview Avenue 
Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA 
shanritz@gmail.com 
Kelley Wagg 
InContext Design 
2352 Main Street, Suite 302 
Concord, MA 01742 USA 
kelley.wagg@incontextdesign.com 
Theo Held 
SAP AG 
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16 69190 
Walldorf, Germany 
theo.held@sap.com 
Eli Wylen 
InContext Design 
2352 Main Street, Suite 302 
Concord, MA 01742 USA 
eli.wylen@incontextdesign.com 
Sally Lawler Kennedy 
SAP Labs, LLC 
3410 Hillview Avenue 
Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA 
sally.lawler.kennedy@sap.com 
Pallavi Kutty 
SAP Labs, LLC 
3410 Hillview Avenue 
Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA 
pallavi.kutty@sap.com 
Copyright 2014 held by Owner/Author. Publication Rights 
Licensed to ACM
This case study outlines the process of using qualitative 
data to design a valid quantitative measure. 
Author Keywords 
Cool; innovation; transformative design; measures; 
metrics; performance 
ACM Classification Keywords 
H.1.2 User/Machine Systems – Human Factors; 
Software Psychology 
Introduction 
The world changed with the release of the iPhone and 
the widespread adoption of iOS and Android devices. 
The impact went far beyond the popularity of the 
smartphone as a product—it affected the way people do 
their work and live their lives. InContext Design wanted 
to understand what was core to this cool user 
experience and articulate it so that it could be used 
systematically to develop transformative products. 
If teams understood the underlying principles of what 
makes a product cool, could those principles be used to 
deliberately design cool into a product? To find out, 
InContext Design conducted extensive field research 
with consumers, then with business professionals 
together with SAP. 
This case study focuses on the process that was 
followed and research conducted by SAP and InContext 
Design to develop the cool measures instrument. It 
provides an example of how reliable metrics may be 
developed with qualitative and quantitative measures 
grounded in a deep understanding of the phenomenon 
being measured. 
Consumer Research – Summer 2010 
The consumer field research involved 65 US consumers 
ages 15-60. Interviews were face-to-face in the 
participants’ home. During the two-hour session the 
discussion was focused around: 1) the most memorable 
cool products from home and personal life; 2) 
experience with products; and 3) a typical day in their 
life. Asking about their own “cool” products focused us 
on people’s self-defined experience of coolness, 
ensuring we were accessing the correct phenomenon. 
An affinity diagram of the qualitative data revealed the 
core themes (constructs) that resulted in the 
conceptual framework described as the Cool Concepts. 
Four constructs, termed the Wheel of Joy, define the 
way the product creates joy by affecting people’s lives 
and fulfilling their core human motives. 
§ Accomplishment: Allows people to get all the 
activities of their life done while on the move. 
§ Connection: Allows people to feel connected and 
maintain their real personal and work relationships – 
and participate in meaningful communities. 
§ Identity: Allows people to define, celebrate, and 
express their unique self. 
§ Sensation: Provides people sensory delight 
through stimulation of the senses and use of animation. 
Three constructs, termed the Triangle of Design, define 
the way people experience and use the product itself. 
§ Direct into action: Intent is achieved in moments 
delivering exactly what is expected, like magic.
§ The Hassle Factor: Eliminates the pain of tool and 
life hassle creating the joy of relief; No set up, no fuss. 
§ The Delta: Eliminates learning by building 
interaction on what people naturally know. 
Questions generated from the Cool Concepts were 
presented in an online survey to 800 US consumers, 
recruited via Craigslist.com. Cool attribute statements 
reflect the top five reasons their product was cool. 
Findings from this study helped gauge product coolness 
and confirmed the seven cool constructs. 
Develop Initial Cool Measures – July 2011 
InContext Design introduced the seven Cool Concepts 
to SAP, and together we set out to extend the 
consumer research into the business world to help us 
understand what makes products cool for professionals. 
During a 5-day immersion workshop, we developed the 
initial set of cool measures to be used in the business 
field study. 
Professional Field Research – Sept 2011 
The business professional field research employed the 
same method as the 2010 consumer field research. In 
addition, data were collected using the initial cool 
measurement instrument. Twenty-eight (28) individuals 
in Sales, Human Resources, Finance, and Procurement 
participated. 
The two-hour interview was focused around: 1) most 
memorable cool work products; 2) experience with 
current work products; 3) cool products from home and 
personal life; 4) a typical day in their life. To conclude 
the session, we asked the business professionals to 
complete the cool measure and we discussed how the 
measures reflect their actual experience. 
Refine Cool Measures – December 2011 
through March 2012 
The prior research resulted in a set of 79 phrases 
related to the seven Cool Concepts. We set out to 
determine whether the measures were representative, 
clustered together, and which dimensions most strongly 
accounted for coolness. We also needed to reduce the 
number of phrases by half so that the metric could be 
administered in 5-8 minutes. 
We conducted two extensive online studies, one in the 
US, the other outside the US (United Kingdom, 
Germany, India, and Singapore), to determine the 
underlying factorial structure and to select the most 
suitable measures. Our 79 measures were presented in 
random order, while participants rated their coolest 
device and business application. 
The analysis of the data revealed that the phrases did 
indeed cluster as predicted by the Cool Concepts, and 
that they differentiated products in terms of “coolness” 
both for devices and software products, including 
business products. The “Connection” concept divided 
into two cool factors (personal life and work 
relationships). Also, the “Direct into Action” and 
“Hassle” factors merged into one factor. The two 
strongest factors for cool in business are 
“Accomplishment” and “Direct into Action/Hassle”. 
We used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to help us: 
1) Ensure that the emerging factors map to the cool 
concepts; 2) Determine the loadings for each factor, 
and thus understand the amount of variance accounted 
by each factor and hence its importance; and 3) 
Reduce redundancy by eliminating phrases associated 
with factors with poor loadings.
A set of 40 phrases, down from 79, were selected as 
statistically valid for a final version of the measures. 
Validate Cool Measures – April 2012 
To assess validity and reliability of the 40 measures, a 
400-person validation study was conducted with 
business professionals in HR, Sales, Finance and 
Procurement within the USA. Statistical analysis 
showed that both the overall measure of Cool and the 
measure for each Cool Concept were valid. Overall, the 
measures were tested with almost 900 consumers and 
over 2000 business professional participants around the 
world in various research activities conducted over 3 
years. The measures differentiate between products, 
and work for devices and software alike. Resulting in 
measures grounded in data. 
Cool Measures Instrument – Description and 
Next Steps 
The overall result of the project is a validated set of 
statements, which can be used to measure the coolness 
of user experiences. Various experiences can be 
measured: 1) product already used and familiar, 2) 
similar competitive products, 3) first time experiences 
on products; and 4) product ideas in development 
(concept, storyboard, prototype). A 7-minute Cool 
Measures survey allows users to compare their 
experience with the product against what they use now. 
Users are shown statements in this form: 
The user selects a point on a scale, reflecting how 
strongly they feel the statement is true, with “Worse” 
and “No change” on the left side of the scale and the 
statement in question on the far right. 
A cool score is derived from the average cool measures 
across participants, applying statistically determined 
correlation coefficients and weightings. The Cool 
Measures instrument helps us understand if this 
product, a new product and/or product idea is better 
than what the participant is using today. Both SAP and 
InContext Design are moving forward using the Cool 
Metric with product teams. InContext has developed 
several models to be used in the design process. 
Acknowledgements 
We thank Dan Rosenberg, SVP from SAP who had the 
vision and confidence that we could develop a coolness 
metric. He also provided resources to complete the 
project. We thank the InContext Design support team 
who helped prepare all of the data immersion and 
workshop materials. We want to acknowledge the two 
PhD statisticians who were skeptical in the beginning, 
but after seeing the results of the analyses became 
believers, enthusiasts, and promoters of the metric. 
References 
[1] Holtzblatt, Karen What Makes Things Cool? 
Interactions Volume 18 Issue 6, November + December 
2011, Pages 40-47, for overview of The Cool Project 
and the Cool Concepts. See also http://bit.ly/vTBmEy 
[2] Holtzblatt, Karen Rapid Contextual Design: a How-to 
Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design 
Morgan Kauffmann Publishers, Elsevier, Inc. San 
Francisco, CA, USA 2005

More Related Content

Similar to CHI2014_Case Study Extended Abstract_Submission #115

SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric AlmquistSALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist
NarcisaBrandenburg70
 
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docx
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docxSALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docx
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docx
gemaherd
 
Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docx
Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docxUnit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docx
Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docx
marilucorr
 
Wearables are dead, long live wearables! the case for the contextual user e...
Wearables are dead, long live wearables!   the case for the contextual user e...Wearables are dead, long live wearables!   the case for the contextual user e...
Wearables are dead, long live wearables! the case for the contextual user e...
Guillaume Tourneur
 
Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.
Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.
Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.
inventionjournals
 
G1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PD
G1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PDG1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PD
G1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PD
2020107940
 
Learn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hr
Learn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hrLearn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hr
Learn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hrQuestionPro
 
Big Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the Marketspace
Big Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the MarketspaceBig Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the Marketspace
Big Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the MarketspaceBala Iyer
 
DUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docx
DUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docxDUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docx
DUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docx
madlynplamondon
 
Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011
Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011
Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011Kevin Carter
 
Uxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentation
Uxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentationUxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentation
Uxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentation
Marcelo Graciolli
 
Whitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint Cycle
Whitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint CycleWhitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint Cycle
Whitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint Cycle
Jacob Brown
 
應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡
應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡 應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡
應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡
Stanley Chang
 
How To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing A
How To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing AHow To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing A
How To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing A
Lisa Martinez
 
Symposium 2010 Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)
Symposium 2010    Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)Symposium 2010    Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)
Symposium 2010 Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)
robgnaedinger
 
Symplicit Ark Persona Presentation V2.1
Symplicit   Ark Persona Presentation   V2.1Symplicit   Ark Persona Presentation   V2.1
Symplicit Ark Persona Presentation V2.1
jodie moule
 
A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...
A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...
A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...
James Heller
 
Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)
Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)
Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)
James Mullooly PhD
 
Incremental vs Monumental Decision-Making
Incremental vs Monumental Decision-MakingIncremental vs Monumental Decision-Making
Incremental vs Monumental Decision-Making
Ipsos France
 
Product concept and design
Product concept and designProduct concept and design
Product concept and design
EllaQuing
 

Similar to CHI2014_Case Study Extended Abstract_Submission #115 (20)

SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric AlmquistSALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist
 
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docx
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docxSALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docx
SALES & MARKETINGThe Elements of Valueby Eric Almquist.docx
 
Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docx
Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docxUnit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docx
Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invent.docx
 
Wearables are dead, long live wearables! the case for the contextual user e...
Wearables are dead, long live wearables!   the case for the contextual user e...Wearables are dead, long live wearables!   the case for the contextual user e...
Wearables are dead, long live wearables! the case for the contextual user e...
 
Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.
Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.
Brand Positioning by Apple Inc.
 
G1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PD
G1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PDG1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PD
G1_Product-Design-G1_Product-Design-G1_PD
 
Learn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hr
Learn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hrLearn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hr
Learn how to do a conjoint analysis project in 1 hr
 
Big Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the Marketspace
Big Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the MarketspaceBig Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the Marketspace
Big Data & Business Analytics: Understanding the Marketspace
 
DUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docx
DUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docxDUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docx
DUE DATE Sunday, 29 March 1159 pm (digital copy to Canvas)Essa.docx
 
Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011
Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011
Technology Review: Innovation Strategies for Business Impact Feb_2011
 
Uxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentation
Uxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentationUxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentation
Uxpin guide to_uxdesign_process_and_documentation
 
Whitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint Cycle
Whitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint CycleWhitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint Cycle
Whitepaper: Integrating market research into the Agile Sprint Cycle
 
應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡
應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡 應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡
應用行動科技紀錄與研究人們日常生活行為與脈絡
 
How To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing A
How To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing AHow To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing A
How To Start A Reflective Essay 8 Tips For Writing A
 
Symposium 2010 Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)
Symposium 2010    Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)Symposium 2010    Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)
Symposium 2010 Gnaedinger Managing (And Leveraging) Information) (3)
 
Symplicit Ark Persona Presentation V2.1
Symplicit   Ark Persona Presentation   V2.1Symplicit   Ark Persona Presentation   V2.1
Symplicit Ark Persona Presentation V2.1
 
A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...
A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...
A Conceptual Model For Integrating Design Thinking And Lean Startup Methods I...
 
Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)
Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)
Ethnographic Opportunity Analysis (Oct.5,2009)
 
Incremental vs Monumental Decision-Making
Incremental vs Monumental Decision-MakingIncremental vs Monumental Decision-Making
Incremental vs Monumental Decision-Making
 
Product concept and design
Product concept and designProduct concept and design
Product concept and design
 

CHI2014_Case Study Extended Abstract_Submission #115

  • 1. Measuring Product “Coolness” – Developing a Measurement Instrument Abstract Cool products provide a leap in value and they increase a company’s market share. The widespread adoption of iOS and Android devices resulted in a radical change in the role of technology in people’s lives. And anecdotally people exclaimed about how “cool” their devices were; “I can’t go back” to what I had before and “I can’t stop talking about it—it’s so cool!” In 2010 InContext Design launched The Cool Project1 to understand the underlying principles, which make a product “cool.” The research goal was to discover the core drivers of the cool user experience. This consumer research used qualitative research to identify seven core constructs associated with “coolness” that appeared independently of device or software or even technology product. In 2011 SAP became interested in developing a metric to measure “coolness” and in a joint research effort with InContext Design validated the constructs with business users and co-designed a cool metric. The final result is a repeatable process for measuring cool through a quick survey, the results of which provide implications to product teams on how to improve their products to increase “coolness”. 1 See Interactions Volume 18 Issue 6, November + December 2011, Pages 40-47, for overview of The Cool Project and the Cool Concepts. See also http://bit.ly/vTBmEy Carol Farnsworth SAP Labs, LLC 3410 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA carol.farnsworth@sap.com Karen Holtzblatt InContext Design 2352 Main Street, Suite 302 Concord, MA 01742 USA karen@incontextdesign.com Shantanu Pai SAP Labs, LLC 3410 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA shanritz@gmail.com Kelley Wagg InContext Design 2352 Main Street, Suite 302 Concord, MA 01742 USA kelley.wagg@incontextdesign.com Theo Held SAP AG Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16 69190 Walldorf, Germany theo.held@sap.com Eli Wylen InContext Design 2352 Main Street, Suite 302 Concord, MA 01742 USA eli.wylen@incontextdesign.com Sally Lawler Kennedy SAP Labs, LLC 3410 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA sally.lawler.kennedy@sap.com Pallavi Kutty SAP Labs, LLC 3410 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA pallavi.kutty@sap.com Copyright 2014 held by Owner/Author. Publication Rights Licensed to ACM
  • 2. This case study outlines the process of using qualitative data to design a valid quantitative measure. Author Keywords Cool; innovation; transformative design; measures; metrics; performance ACM Classification Keywords H.1.2 User/Machine Systems – Human Factors; Software Psychology Introduction The world changed with the release of the iPhone and the widespread adoption of iOS and Android devices. The impact went far beyond the popularity of the smartphone as a product—it affected the way people do their work and live their lives. InContext Design wanted to understand what was core to this cool user experience and articulate it so that it could be used systematically to develop transformative products. If teams understood the underlying principles of what makes a product cool, could those principles be used to deliberately design cool into a product? To find out, InContext Design conducted extensive field research with consumers, then with business professionals together with SAP. This case study focuses on the process that was followed and research conducted by SAP and InContext Design to develop the cool measures instrument. It provides an example of how reliable metrics may be developed with qualitative and quantitative measures grounded in a deep understanding of the phenomenon being measured. Consumer Research – Summer 2010 The consumer field research involved 65 US consumers ages 15-60. Interviews were face-to-face in the participants’ home. During the two-hour session the discussion was focused around: 1) the most memorable cool products from home and personal life; 2) experience with products; and 3) a typical day in their life. Asking about their own “cool” products focused us on people’s self-defined experience of coolness, ensuring we were accessing the correct phenomenon. An affinity diagram of the qualitative data revealed the core themes (constructs) that resulted in the conceptual framework described as the Cool Concepts. Four constructs, termed the Wheel of Joy, define the way the product creates joy by affecting people’s lives and fulfilling their core human motives. § Accomplishment: Allows people to get all the activities of their life done while on the move. § Connection: Allows people to feel connected and maintain their real personal and work relationships – and participate in meaningful communities. § Identity: Allows people to define, celebrate, and express their unique self. § Sensation: Provides people sensory delight through stimulation of the senses and use of animation. Three constructs, termed the Triangle of Design, define the way people experience and use the product itself. § Direct into action: Intent is achieved in moments delivering exactly what is expected, like magic.
  • 3. § The Hassle Factor: Eliminates the pain of tool and life hassle creating the joy of relief; No set up, no fuss. § The Delta: Eliminates learning by building interaction on what people naturally know. Questions generated from the Cool Concepts were presented in an online survey to 800 US consumers, recruited via Craigslist.com. Cool attribute statements reflect the top five reasons their product was cool. Findings from this study helped gauge product coolness and confirmed the seven cool constructs. Develop Initial Cool Measures – July 2011 InContext Design introduced the seven Cool Concepts to SAP, and together we set out to extend the consumer research into the business world to help us understand what makes products cool for professionals. During a 5-day immersion workshop, we developed the initial set of cool measures to be used in the business field study. Professional Field Research – Sept 2011 The business professional field research employed the same method as the 2010 consumer field research. In addition, data were collected using the initial cool measurement instrument. Twenty-eight (28) individuals in Sales, Human Resources, Finance, and Procurement participated. The two-hour interview was focused around: 1) most memorable cool work products; 2) experience with current work products; 3) cool products from home and personal life; 4) a typical day in their life. To conclude the session, we asked the business professionals to complete the cool measure and we discussed how the measures reflect their actual experience. Refine Cool Measures – December 2011 through March 2012 The prior research resulted in a set of 79 phrases related to the seven Cool Concepts. We set out to determine whether the measures were representative, clustered together, and which dimensions most strongly accounted for coolness. We also needed to reduce the number of phrases by half so that the metric could be administered in 5-8 minutes. We conducted two extensive online studies, one in the US, the other outside the US (United Kingdom, Germany, India, and Singapore), to determine the underlying factorial structure and to select the most suitable measures. Our 79 measures were presented in random order, while participants rated their coolest device and business application. The analysis of the data revealed that the phrases did indeed cluster as predicted by the Cool Concepts, and that they differentiated products in terms of “coolness” both for devices and software products, including business products. The “Connection” concept divided into two cool factors (personal life and work relationships). Also, the “Direct into Action” and “Hassle” factors merged into one factor. The two strongest factors for cool in business are “Accomplishment” and “Direct into Action/Hassle”. We used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to help us: 1) Ensure that the emerging factors map to the cool concepts; 2) Determine the loadings for each factor, and thus understand the amount of variance accounted by each factor and hence its importance; and 3) Reduce redundancy by eliminating phrases associated with factors with poor loadings.
  • 4. A set of 40 phrases, down from 79, were selected as statistically valid for a final version of the measures. Validate Cool Measures – April 2012 To assess validity and reliability of the 40 measures, a 400-person validation study was conducted with business professionals in HR, Sales, Finance and Procurement within the USA. Statistical analysis showed that both the overall measure of Cool and the measure for each Cool Concept were valid. Overall, the measures were tested with almost 900 consumers and over 2000 business professional participants around the world in various research activities conducted over 3 years. The measures differentiate between products, and work for devices and software alike. Resulting in measures grounded in data. Cool Measures Instrument – Description and Next Steps The overall result of the project is a validated set of statements, which can be used to measure the coolness of user experiences. Various experiences can be measured: 1) product already used and familiar, 2) similar competitive products, 3) first time experiences on products; and 4) product ideas in development (concept, storyboard, prototype). A 7-minute Cool Measures survey allows users to compare their experience with the product against what they use now. Users are shown statements in this form: The user selects a point on a scale, reflecting how strongly they feel the statement is true, with “Worse” and “No change” on the left side of the scale and the statement in question on the far right. A cool score is derived from the average cool measures across participants, applying statistically determined correlation coefficients and weightings. The Cool Measures instrument helps us understand if this product, a new product and/or product idea is better than what the participant is using today. Both SAP and InContext Design are moving forward using the Cool Metric with product teams. InContext has developed several models to be used in the design process. Acknowledgements We thank Dan Rosenberg, SVP from SAP who had the vision and confidence that we could develop a coolness metric. He also provided resources to complete the project. We thank the InContext Design support team who helped prepare all of the data immersion and workshop materials. We want to acknowledge the two PhD statisticians who were skeptical in the beginning, but after seeing the results of the analyses became believers, enthusiasts, and promoters of the metric. References [1] Holtzblatt, Karen What Makes Things Cool? Interactions Volume 18 Issue 6, November + December 2011, Pages 40-47, for overview of The Cool Project and the Cool Concepts. See also http://bit.ly/vTBmEy [2] Holtzblatt, Karen Rapid Contextual Design: a How-to Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design Morgan Kauffmann Publishers, Elsevier, Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA 2005