Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation Review the processes of invention and innovation. Then, select a new product that you have been introduced to in the past 12 months. You are encouraged to research this new product using outside sources. You can use the same company you have been researching, or pick a new one. You are to create a PowerPoint presentation about future inventions this new product could help to inspire and what innovations could be developed to enhance and improve this product. Analyze how these two areas could impact the company. Perform an analysis or SWOT on potential impact of inventions or innovations. Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following elements:  Slide 1: Title page  Slide 2: Objective or table of contents  Slide 3: Description of the new product  Slide 4: Description of the importance of R&D to include lead users and market research  Slide 5: Discussion of appropriate structure and culture necessary to support innovative ideas and products  Slide 6: Exploration of future inventions inspired by the product  Slide 7: Analysis of future innovations of this product (Was this a successful invention leading to innovation?)  Slide 8: ROI, shareholder value, economic value added analysis, or a SWOT, on innovation  Slide 9: ROI, shareholder value, economic value added analysis or a SWOT, on invention  Slide 10: Brief description of the benchmarking process as applied to this company (What problems with performance measuring can be encountered?)  Slide 11: Prediction of product demand in five years  Slide 12: Conclusion  Slide 13: List of sources using APA guidelines Please ensure that every slide has a title at the top explaining what the slide covers. Add citations in proper APA format, use applicable pictures or graphics, use a slide template, and avoid wordy slides by focusing on bullet points. Remember, this is an academic presentation. Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below. Scenario:   George Cosgrove is the Senior Vice President (SVP) for Quality Control at All-in-One Pharmaceutical, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the Company), a multi-million-dollar medical supply manufacturer and distributor with offices in several states. George has been with the Company for 25 years in a variety of positions but his current position, which he has held for the last 5 years, is by far his plum assignment and position with the Company. George oversees all testing of products, putting to good use his advanced degree in supply chain management, with a concentration in healthcare. He is known throughout the Company, as the “go to” person on any of the Company’s numerous products. As SVP, George is one of the final Company officials to approve the launch of any its products on the market. One of the Company’s signature products is a device called “Shot-o-Vac,” a revolutionary device depended upon by many consumers ...

1. Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation
Review the processes of invention and innovation. Then, select
a new product that you have been introduced to in the past 12
months. You are encouraged to research this new product using
outside sources. You can use the same company you have been
researching, or pick a new one.
You are to create a PowerPoint presentation about future
inventions this new product could help to inspire and what
innovations could be developed to enhance and improve this
product. Analyze how these two areas could impact the
company. Perform an analysis or SWOT on potential impact of
inventions or innovations. Your PowerPoint presentation should
include the following elements:
duct
lead users and market research
necessary to support innovative ideas and products
ired by the
product
this a successful invention leading to innovation?)
analysis, or a SWOT, on innovation
value, economic value added
analysis or a SWOT, on invention
applied to this company (What problems with performance
measuring can be encountered?)
five years

2. Please ensure that every slide has a title at the top explaining
what the slide covers. Add citations in proper APA format, use
applicable pictures or graphics, use a slide template, and avoid
wordy slides by focusing on bullet points. Remember, this is an
academic presentation.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this
assignment is provided below.
Scenario:
George Cosgrove is the Senior Vice President (SVP) for Quality
Control at All-in-One Pharmaceutical, Inc. (hereinafter referred
to
as the Company), a multi-million-dollar medical supply
manufacturer and distributor with offices in several states.
George has been with the Company for 25 years in a variety of
positions but his current position, which he has held for the last
5
years, is by far his plum assignment and position with the
Company.
George oversees all testing of products, putting to good use his
advanced degree in supply chain management, with a
concentration in healthcare. He is known throughout the
Company, as the “go to” person on any of the Company’s
numerous products.
As SVP, George is one of the final Company officials to
approve
the launch of any its products on the market.
One of the Company’s signature products is a device called
“Shot-o-Vac,” a revolutionary device depended upon by many

3. consumers for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions.
The Company spent millions of dollars developing the product
and the U.S. Patent Office recently extended its intellectual
property rights in the product for another 5 years, which
virtually
guarantees that the Company will have no competition in the
manufacture and distribution of this product during the
extension
period.
Excited and pleased over the government’s action extending the
Company’s intellectual property rights, the CEO, Perry
Periwinkle,
called George into his office to give him the great news.
Given George’s prominence in the company and his work
developing the Shot-o-Vac, the CEO wanted to share a toast to
the great news. George was ecstatic over the news and
appreciative of the CEO’s acknowledgement of his efforts.
During
their conversation, the CEO told George that the extension of
the
intellectual property rights not only meant long-term stability
for
the Company, but also meant the green light for the CEO’s plan
to
double the price of the device. George was taken aback by this
news, as he had always believed the price was correctly set and
provided a good profit margin for the Company.
Seeing the concerned look on George’s face, the CEO patted
him

4. on the back and said “George-- in this business one has to strike
while the iron is hot, and this will increase everyone’s
compensation. I know this is important to you because you
have
three kids in college.”
Having been present at the meetings with the government
discussing the extension of the intellectual property rights,
George
recalled the CEO’s representations that the Company did not
foresee any significant increases in the price of the device in
the
near term, and that any increases would be commensurate with
any increases in the Company’s costs associated with the
manufacture of the device. When George reminded the CEO of
these representations, the CEO noted that they were not legally
binding and were just gamesmanship. Whether the
representations were legally binding or not, George could not
put
out of his mind his belief that they played a part in the US
Patent
Office’s decision.
While the CEO is anxious to roll out the newly priced device,
he
values George’s advice and the concerned look on George’s
face
did not go unnoticed. The CEO’s last words to George were "if
you have any reservations at all, you need to let me know."
George, with many thoughts racing through his mind, including
his internal pledge to himself that he would always be an
instrument for good, assured the CEO that he would give him
his

5. best counsel and left the office to think about what he should
do.
· What's New
· Frequently Asked Questions
· Help Guide
· Classroom Walkthrough
· Live Support / Help Topics
· System Check
· LEO Feedback
Are You Still There?
Your session expires after 180 minutes of inactivity, which
protects your information in case you've left your device
without logging out.
Hit a key or click anywhere to stay logged in.
Oh, There You Are!
Top of Form
Instructions
Paper B1: a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational
(or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy.
This assignment gives you an opportunity to analyze a key IT-
related organizational (or personal, if not in the job force)
ethical issue, related to privacysubject to relevant laws,

6. regulations, and policies. Both of the following sites provide
sources, and an excellent backdrop for issues relating to privacy
protection and the law.
See EPIC Privacy Issues at: http://epic.org/privacy/ See List
on left and/or: EFF Privacy at
https://www.eff.org/issues/privacy [see list in center on this
page].
This includes sub-topics discussing information privacy,
privacy laws, applications and court rulings (case law is usually
an extension of the basic law based on the facts from specific
cases and real-world court decisions), and key privacy and
anonymity issues. While the sites provide many interesting
topics, be sure to focus on our class IT topics.
1. Use the template below and the list of suggested workforce
privacy topics from one of the sites above to produce a matrix
to map a key organizational ethical (or personal, if not in the
job force) issue and how this issue is affected by laws,
regulations, and policies. Use the list of normative ethics
principles below to help you complete the matrix. Choose any
three (only three) of the following list of twelve (12) principles
of normative ethics described below.
2. Prepare the Ethical Issue matrix and include the following
explanation (200 words) —double-space your narrative—below
the matrix:
1. Why I chose the dilemma;
2. Why I chose the three principles; and
3. An analysis of the research used to identify the actions in the
matrix.
The completed matrix allows you to weigh the different issues
involved and assign a rank as to the importance of the actions
based on the effect on the stakeholders.
1. Submit the matrix for grading to the LEO Assignments
Module.
2. Indicate appropriate APA in-text and source citations for all
sources. In addition to critical thinking and analysis skills,
your assignment should reflect appropriate grammar and

7. spelling, good organization, and proper business-writing style.
This assignment is directly related to Paper-B2. The ethical
issue identified in this assignment will be used in your Paper B2
Assignment. Paper B2 asks you to write a policy that corrects
the ethical issue described in Paper B1.
Normative Ethics List
Autonomy: is the duty to maximize the individual's right to
make his or her own decisions.
Beneficence: is the duty to do good both individually and for
all.
Confidentiality: is the duty to respect privacy of information
and action.
Equality: is the duty to view all people as moral equals.
Finality: is the duty to take action that may override the
demands of law, religion, and social customs.
Justice: is the duty to treat all fairly, distributing the risks and
benefits equally.
Non-maleficence: is the duty to cause no harm, both
individually and for all.
Understanding/Tolerance: is the duty to understand and to
accept another viewpoint if reason dictates doing so is
warranted.
Publicity: is the duty to take actions based on ethical standards
that must be known and recognized by all who are involved.
Respect for persons: is the duty to honor others, their rights,
and their responsibilities. Showing respect others implies that
we do not treat them as a mere means to our end.
Universality: is the duty to take actions that hold for everyone,
regardless of time, place, or people involved. This concept is
similar to the Categorical Imperative.
Veracity: is the duty to tell the truth.
A sample template for the matrix is shown below. To
reconstruct the sample template, you may use the Table Tool in
MS Word or copy and paste this template.
Ethical issue:
Stakeholders

8. (Principle 1)
(Principle 2)
(Principle 3)
1
2
3
4
Step 1: Identify the ethical issue that you want to analyze, as
described above. An example might be the falsification of your
personal profile in a social networking site.
Step 2: Identify the stakeholders involved. You, someone who
reads your personal profile in a social network site, potential
employers, etc. Be sure that each stakeholder category is unique
and not similar to another category you use.
Step 3: Choose any three (only three) of the principles that
might apply to your issue such as autonomy, publicity, and
veracity.
Step 4: identify how the ethical issue affects each stakeholder
based on the principles you identified. Put this statement in the
matrix next to the stakeholder.
Sample Completed Matrix
Ethical issue: falsifying your profile on a social networking site
Stakeholders
autonomy

9. publicity
veracity
1: Yourself
You have the duty to maximize the right to make your own
decisions.
You have the duty to take actions based on ethical standards
that must be known and recognized by all who are involved.
You have the duty to tell the truth
2: Other users of the networking site
They have the duty to make their own decisions
They make these decisions based on ethical standards that
should be recognized by the person falsifying their profile
They assume that the person falsifying the profile has the duty
to tell the truth.
3: The social networking site
The autonomy of the site is limited by law (Goldman, 2007)
Users of social networking sites are content publishers, as such
the site must take actions based on legal and ethical standards
and must notify users of these standards so they are known by
all.
As providers of content the site must conform to the laws
regarding truth or be held responsible for legal issues as
defamation (making harmful false statements about someone
else) or copyright infringement. (Goldman, 2007)
Reference:
Goldman, E. (2007, May). Social Networking Sites and the Law.
Retrieved from
http://www.ericgoldman.org/Resources/socialnetworkingsitesan
dthelaw.pdf
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Paper B1 - Fall 2016

10. Criteria
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Ethical Issue - Select a specific ethical issue in accord with the
LP requirements.
0.5 points
The ethical issue selected was within the parameters defined
and was narrowed down to a specific concern.
0.4 points
The ethical issue selected was within the parameters defined,
but was of a general, not specific nature..
0.3 points
The ethical issue selected was too broad, and included sub-
issues.
Stakeholders - Identify stakeholders regarding the issue.
0.5 points
Three or more of the stakeholders directly connected with the
ethical issue were identified.
0.4 points
Less than three of the stakeholders directly connected with the
ethical issue were identified.
0.3 points
None of the stakeholders directly connected with the ethical
issue were identified.
Principles - Choose three normative ethics principles from
Conference Session Two for evaluation of the issue.
0.5 points

11. The three principles identified were logically associated with
the ethical issue selected.
0.4 points
The three principles identified had an ambiguous association
with the selected ethical issue.
0.3 points
The three principles identified had a weak or no relation with
the selected ethical issue.
Effects of Issue - Determine the effects of the issue upon the
stakeholders considering the principles selected.
4.5 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the
chosen principles demonstrated a critical thinking process.
3.6 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the
chosen principles demonstrated a good thinking process.
2.7 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the
chosen principles did not demonstrate logical thinking.
Matrix Explanation - Explain the choice of issue, the choice of
principles, and a short analysis of the research used to identify
the actions in the matrix.
4 points
The paper provided an excellent explanation of the three
required points within the length specified.
3.2 points
The paper provided a satisfactory explanation of the three
required points, but was short of the length specified.

12. 2.4 points
The paper did not provide an explanation for each of the three
required points.
Matrix Construction
0.5 points
Matrix was constructed according to specifications.
0.4 points
Matrix was constructed generally according to specifications
0.3 points
Matrix did not follow specifications.
APA Compliance
1 point
Source citations are in full compliance with APA style
requirements.
0.8 points
Source citations are in general compliance with APA style
requirements.
0.6 points
Source citations are not in compliance with APA style
requirements.
Mechanics
0.5 points
Grammar, personal pronouns, contractions, spelling, and
punctuation correctly applied.
0.4 points
Few grammar, personal pronouns, contractions, spelling, or
punctuation errors exist.

13. 0.3 points
Numerous grammar, personal pronouns, contractions, and
spelling errors. Punctuation not correctly applied. Underline
errors in MS Word not correct.
Overall Score
Level 1
12 or more
Level 2
6 or more
Level 3
0 or more
Bottom of Form
410545
false
118756118237525