30. .08)FV(rate,nper,pmt,pv)ComputeFV =$14,693.28(Notice that
the spreadsheet has the same sign convention as the calculators
with positive inflows and negative outflows. A negative sign
was placed before the FV formula to make the result
positive.)Note that this problem does not include a payment, so
it was entered as 0.
Present ValueYou need $150,000 in 18 years for your daughter's
eductation. If you can earn 6% per year, how much do you need
to invest today?What are you looking for?FV =150,000NPER
=18Use the PV formula:RATE =6%(Same as
.06)PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv)ComputePV =$52,551.57
RateYou have $30,000 to invest and you need $45,000 for a
down payment and closing costs on a house. If you want to buy
the house in 2 years, what rate of interest do you need to
earn?What are you looking for?PV =30,000FV =45,000Use the
RATE formula: RATE(nper,pmt,pv,fv)NPER =2ComputeRATE
=22.47%(Note that the rate will display as a whole percent, you
need to format the cell to see the decimal places.)Note a
negative sign was entered before the cell reference for the FV to
maintain the sign convention.
Number of PeriodsYou have $15,000 to invest right now and
you figure you will need $25,000 to buy a new car. If you can
earn 9% per year, how long before you can buy the car?What
are you looking for?PV =15,000FV =25,000Use the NPER
formula:RATE =9%(Same as
.09)NPER(rate,pmt,pv,fv)ComputeNPER =5.9275850487years
Assessment Task 1:
Paper Review:1800 words
A review of a journal article based on a psychological
intervention
For example you could use one of these examples:
31. Hilton, L., Hempel, S., Ewing, B. A., Apaydin, E., Xenakis, L.,
Newberry, S., ... & Maglione, M. A. (2017). Mindfulness
meditation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-
analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(2), 199-213.
Heron, K. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2010). Ecological momentary
interventions: incorporating mobile technology into
psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. British journal of
health psychology, 15(1), 1-39.
Tan, L., Wang, M. J., Modini, M., Joyce, S., Mykletun, A.,
Christensen, H., & Harvey, S. B. (2014). Preventing the
development of depression at work: a systematic review and
metaanalysis of universal interventions in the workplace. BMC
medicine, 12(1), 74
Suggested guidance for the paper review:
1. Write in the third person.
2. Give details of the paper, date, authors, where published
3. Present a summary of the key points along with a limited
number of examples. You can also briefly explain the author’s
purpose/intentions throughout the text and you may briefly
describe how the text is organised. The summary should only
make up about a third of the critical review.
4. The review should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of
the strengths in the form of a critique, weakness and notable
feature, and key arguments of the text. Remember to base your
discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other
sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference).
5. Give a conclusion – drawing on the key issue raised
regarding the text, with recommendations for further work,
or/and application, impact, etc
6. Remember to cite any sources which you have used to
32. support/refute arguments etc (references)
Possible focus questions:
Significance and contribution to the field
* What is the author's aim?
* To what extent has this aim been achieved?
* What does this text add to the body of knowledge? (This
could be in terms of theory, data and/or practical application)
* What relationship does it bear to other works in the field?
* What is missing/not stated?
* Is this a problem?
Methodology or approach (this usually applies to more formal,
research-based texts)
* What approach was used for the research? (eg; quantitative
or qualitative, analysis/review of theory or current practice,
comparative, case study, personal reflection etc...)
* How objective/biased is the approach?
* Are the results valid and reliable?
* What analytical framework is used to discuss the results?
Argument and use of evidence
* Is there a clear problem, statement or hypothesis?
* What claims are made?
* Is the argument consistent?
Evidence/conclusions/assumptions
* What kinds of evidence does the text rely on?
* How valid and reliable is the evidence?
* How effective is the evidence in supporting the argument?
* What conclusions are drawn?
* Are these conclusions justified?
Writing style and text structure
* Does the writing style suit the intended audience? (eg;
expert/non-expert, academic/non-academic)
* What is the organising principle of the text? Could it be
better organised?
33. Suggested Reading:
Concise/Indicative Reading List
Books:
Davey, G.C. Psychopathology: Research, Assessment and
Treatment in Clinical Psychology. Oxford: John Wiley and
Sons.
Morrison, V. (2016). Introduction to Health Psychology (4th
Edition). Harlow: Pearson.
Wedding D and Corsini, R (2013). Current
Psychotherapies.(10th Edition) San Francisco: Wadsworth
Publishing
Journals:
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology
Clinical Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review
Journal of Counselling Psychology
Learning Outcomes to be assessed: To critically appraise
research on psychological interventions to promote mental and
physical health and well being.
Grading Criteria:
CRITERIA
MARKS AWARDED
Introduction – 25%
· Give details of the paper, date, authors, where published.
· What was the authors aim, predictions/hypotheses?
34. · To what extent has this aim been achieved?
· What does this text add to the body of knowledge? (This could
be in terms of theory, data and/or practical application)
· What relationship does it bear to other works in the field?
/ 25
Main Body – 50%
· Present a summary of the key points along with a limited
number of examples.
· You can also briefly explain the author’s purpose/intentions
throughout the text and you may briefly describe how the text is
organised. The summary should only make up about a third of
the critical review.
· The review should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of
the strengths in the form of a critique, weakness and notable
feature, and key arguments of the text. E.g.
· What approach was used for the research? (eg; quantitative or
qualitative, analysis/review of theory or current practice,
comparative, case study, personal reflection etc...)
· How objective/biased is the approach?
· Are the results valid and reliable?
· What analytical framework is used to discuss the results?
Argument and use of evidence
· Is there a clear problem, statement or hypothesis?
· What claims are made?
· Is the argument consistent?
Evidence/conclusions/assumptions
· What kinds of evidence does the text rely on?
35. · How valid and reliable is the evidence?
· How effective is the evidence in supporting the argument?
· What conclusions are drawn?
· Are these conclusions justified?
/ 50
Conclusion– 25%
· A summary of your key points.
· Ability to draw main points of discussion together
· Linkage of conclusions to assignment title.
/ 25
Students should recognise that the marking criteria are weighted
to indicate its importance in relation to the information
required.
NB: these subsections should only be used as guidance towards
marking and content. This is an academic essay and subsections
should not be used within the main body of work.
Assessment Task 2:
Project Report. 4200 words.
36. Design a psychological based intervention in the form of an
informative leaflet to promote psychological health & well -
being
(700 words).
The proposed intervention should be accompanied by a report
(3500 words) focusing on all elements of the process
(formulation of the rationale for the intervention, proposed
delivery and subsequent method of evaluation).
Assignment Guidelines:
For the leaflet: Introduction (5%), main body and discussion
(10%) conclusion (5%).
Introduction (5%)
Should include: Definition, background and explanation of the
psychological based intervention of your choice supported by
research evidence.
Main body (10%)
Should include a detailed review and discussion of your
psychological based intervention and how similar interventions
in relation to your chosen area (e.g., managing stress or anxiety
in the workplace) have been found to promote psychological
health & well-being. A line of argument supporting the benefits
of your chosen intervention is also helpful. This should be
supported by research evidence.
Conclusion (5%)
A summary of your key points of your chosen intervention as to
how this promotes psychological health & well-being and
implications of such interventions for the future psychological
health & well-being.
The proposed intervention should be accompanied by a report
(3500 words) focusing on all elements of the process
(formulation of the rationale for the intervention, proposed
delivery and subsequent method of evaluation).
37. For the report: Abstract (10%), Introduction (25%), Method
(20%), Discussion (15%) and Reference (10%):
Abstract (200-250 words)
An abstract is a brief summary of the research carried out. Its
length should be between 200 and 250 words. It must contain
brief details about:
1. Main background intervention
2. Aim of the intervention - the research question
3. The method used and the basic design of the intervention
4. Subsequent method of evaluation
Introduction (approx 1500-2000 words)
The Introduction should begin with a broad review of the area
leading towards a review of the specific question under study.
Its main purpose is to provide a rationale for the formulation of
the present intervention. Outline the key theories relevant to the
intervention, and mention any problems or controversies in the
area. The final paragraph should be clear statement/hypotheses
about the specific intervention under study of your choice.
Method: (Word count approx 500-700 words)
Here you should focus on the proposed delivery of your chosen
intervention. Details about design and method of proposed
delivery, e.g., weekly sessions? How many participants?
Confidentiality of participants? Etc.
Discussion (approx 400-550 words)
You should consider how you might evaluate your intervention:
Some focus questions to think about here: e.g., you should
appraise your own intervention critically (play devil’s advocate)
and evaluate it in the wider context and in its relation to
appropriate theories. Also its strengths/weaknesses; try to
support your arguments with theoretical/empirical findings
which have used similar interventions as a basis.
38. You must include a full and accurate APA reference list. You
can refer to the APA website for guidance on this
http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx Alternatively,
Purdue Online Writing Lab is a useful and practical resource
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/
Further Guidance for this assessment
The question is very broad so your challenge is to decide how to
focus your answer.
The key issue in this Project Report:
Design a psychological based intervention in the form of an
informative leaflet to promote psychological health & well -
being (700 words).
The proposed intervention should be accompanied by a report
(3500 words) focusing on all elements of the process
(formulation of the rationale for the intervention, proposed
delivery and subsequent method of evaluation).
You are required to consider one psychological based
intervention for e.g., stress management, anxiety, depression,
resilience. These are just examples. You need to do some
reading around the topic before deciding upon the type of
intervention to be considered.
Psychological stress, as an example can take many forms in
terms of it being a major stressor, minor hassles or the
transaction between stress and your appraisal. This may take
into account coping strategies, social support, personality
factors etc.
Your proposed intervention should focus on all elements of the
process: e.g., formulation of the rationale for the intervention,
proposed delivery and subsequent method of evaluation.
There is not a SINGLE answer that is appropriate; you may
choose to answer the question in a number of ways. DO NOT
TRY TO INCLUDE EVERYTHING that might be relevant or
important. Instead, you should select and justify the approach
you have decided to take and select research evidence around
this topic.
39. The title gives you a lot of scope for researching an area which
you find interesting. One important consideration is the balance
between breadth (how many different ideas/arguments you
present) and depth (how much attention you pay to each
idea/argument in your work). It is generally better to focus on
fewer ideas/arguments in greater detail than to make brief and
superficial reference to multiple ideas, without discussing or
evaluating any of the evidence. You should avoid composing
paragraphs containing only the conclusions from multiple
studies, without any sense of what was done in key studies and
the quality of this research.
You must include a full and accurate APA reference list. You
can refer to the APA website for guidance on this
http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx Alternatively,
Purdue Online Writing Lab is a useful and practical resource
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/
To make your choice more straightforward, look for appropriate
articles in Health Psychology journals (e.g., British Journal of
Health Psychology, Health Psychology, European Journal of
Health Psychology) and Clinical Journals such as the British
Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Text books or specialist topic books are useful for getting an
introduction to the area of interest and review articles,
especially systematic review and meta-analysis articles, are also
helpful in providing an overview of recent research findings.
You can always chase up the references in a review article if
you need more information about the individual studies
presented in the review.
Suggested Reading
Learning Outcomes to be assessed: To engage in sophisticated
critical appraisal of the efficacy of different psychological
interventions to promote health and mental health.
43. consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
6C-‹#›
5.5
Section 6.1 (A)
The students can read the example in the book. It is also
provided here.
You think you will be able to deposit $4,000 at the end of each
of the next three years in a bank account paying 8 percent
interest. You currently have $7,000 in the account. How much
will you have in three years? In four years?
Point out that there are several ways that this can be worked.
The book works this example by rolling the value forward each
year. The presentation will show the second way to work the
problem, finding the future value at the end for each cash flow
and then adding. Point out that you can find the value of a set of
cash flows at any point in time, all you have to do is get the
value of each cash flow at that point in time and then add them
together.
I entered the PV as negative for two reasons. (1) It is a cash
outflow since it is an investment. (2) The FV is computed as
positive, and the students can then just store each calcul ation
and then add from the memory registers, instead of writing
down all of the numbers and taking the risk of keying something
back into the calculator incorrectly.
Formula:
Today (year 0): FV = 7000(1.08)3 = 8,817.98
47. 5.9
Section 6.1 (B)
The students can read the example in the book.
You are offered an investment that will pay you $200 in one
year, $400 the next year, $600 the next year and $800 at the end
of the fourth year. You can earn 12 percent on very similar
investments. What is the most you should pay for this one?
Point out that the question could also be phrased as “How much
is this investment worth?”
Remember the sign convention. The negative numbers imply
that we would have to pay 1,432.93 today to receive the cash
flows in the future.
Formula:
Year 1 CF: 200 / (1.12)1 = 178.57
Year 2 CF: 400 / (1.12)2 = 318.88
Year 3 CF: 600 / (1.12)3 = 427.07
Year 4 CF: 800 / (1.12)4 = 508.41
Example 6.3 Timeline
0
1
2
3
4
51. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written
consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
6C-‹#›
5.13
Section 6.1 (B)
The next example will be worked using the cash flow keys.
Note that with the BA-II Plus, the students can double check the
numbers they have entered by pressing the up and down arrows.
It is similar to entering the cash flows into spreadsheet cells.
Other calculators also have cash flow keys. You enter the
information by putting in the cash flow and then pressing CF.
You have to always start with the year 0 cash flow, even if it is
zero.
Remind the students that the cash flows have to occur at even
intervals, so if you skip a year, you still have to enter a 0 cash
flow for that year.
Your broker calls you and tells you that he has this great
investment opportunity.
If you invest $100 today, you will receive $40 in one year and
$75 in two years.
If you require a 15% return on investments of this risk, should
you take the investment?
Use the CF keys to compute the value of the investment.
CF; CF0 = 0; C01 = 40; F01 = 1; C02 = 75; F02 = 1
65. 6C-‹#›
5.31
Section 6.2 (A)
You ran a little short on your spring break vacation, so you put
$1,000 on your credit card. You can only afford to make the
minimum payment of $20 per month. The interest rate on the
credit card is 1.5 percent per month. How long will you need to
pay off the $1,000?
This is an excellent opportunity to talk about credit card debt
and the problems that can develop if it is not handled properly.
Many students don’t understand how it works, and it is rarely
discussed. This is something that students can take away from
the class, even if they aren’t finance majors.
1000 = 20(1 – 1/1.015t) / .015
.75 = 1 – 1 / 1.015t
1 / 1.015t = .25
1 / .25 = 1.015t
t = ln(1/.25) / ln(1.015) = 93.111 months = 7.75 years
Suppose you borrow $2,000 at 5%, and you are going to make
annual payments of $734.42.
How long before you pay off the loan?
Sign convention matters!!!
5 I/Y
2,000 PV
-734.42 PMT
CPT N = 3 years
95. 6C-‹#›
6C-‹#›
Future ValueConsider the cash flows presented in the table
below. What is the value of the cash flows in year
5?Rate15%(Same as .15)YearNPERCash FlowFuture
ValueFormula141000$1,749.01=-
FV($B$3,B6,0,C6)233000$4,562.63=-
FV($B$3,B7,0,C7)325000$6,612.50=-
FV($B$3,B8,0,C8)417000$8,050.00=-
FV($B$3,B9,0,C9)509000$9,000.00=-
FV($B$3,B10,0,C10)Total
PV$29,974.13=SUM(D6:D10)Comments:The negative sign
before the FV formula makes the result positive.The dollar
signs around B3 make the rate an absolute reference so that the
formula may be entered once and then copied down.The formua
asks for a payment between number of periods and present
value, hence the 0.
Present ValueConsider the cash flows presented in the table
below. What is the present value?Rate15%(Same as
.15)YearCash FlowPresent ValueFormula11000$869.5 7=-
PV($B$3,A6,0,B6)23000$2,268.43=-
PV($B$3,A7,0,B7)35000$3,287.58=-
PV($B$3,A8,0,B8)47000$4,002.27=-
PV($B$3,A9,0,B9)59000$4,474.59=-PV($B$3,A10,0,B10)Total
PV$14,902.44=SUM(C6:C10)Comments:The negative sign
before the PV formula makes the result positive.The dollar
signs around B3 make the rate an absolute reference so that the
formula may be entered once and then copied down.The formua
asks for a payment between number of periods and future value,
hence the 0.
97. 01.
)01.1(
1
1
632
48
Present ValueWhat is the present value of $50,000 per year for
15 years if the interest rate is 7%?PMT =50,000RATE
=7%(Same as .07)NPER =15Present Value
=$455,395.70Formula:=-PV(B4,B5,B3)Note: The negative sign
in the formula makes the result positive. You could also put a
negative sign before the PMT inside the parentheses.
Future ValueWhat is the future value of $50,000 per year for 15
years if the interest rate is 7%?PMT =50,000RATE =7%(Same
as .07)NPER =15Present Value =$1,256,451.10Formula:=-
FV(B4,B5,B3)Note: The negative sign in the formula makes the
result positive. You could also put a negative sign before the
PMT inside the parentheses.
Sheet1You are going to borrow $250,000 to buy a house. What
98. will your monthly payment be if the interest rate is .58% per
month and you borrow the money for 30 years?PV
=250,000NPER =360(30 years * 12 months per year)RATE
=0.58%(Same as .0058)Monthly Payment
=($1,656.55)Formula=PMT(B5,B4,B3)The payment was left as
negative to indicate that it is a cash outflow.
t
t
r
gC
r
gC
r
C
PV
)1(
)1(
)1(
)1(
)1(
1
2
ú
ú
û
ù